If you know others that like this sort of content (animations comparisons etc.), sharing with them helps a lot! My Playlist with Game Finishers & Takedown Animations: ruclips.net/p/PLHIRd7nyZ1j1sWy6BW_CyuC36PsQwryCY My Playlist with Weapon Animations: ruclips.net/p/PLHIRd7nyZ1j3DGEiCf4kMfTRCnizDpufV
I’ve started playing again after a long time. I used to think the maps were empty and had no vibrancy or ambiance, I was so wrong. This game is so damn cinematic.
Yep, it was their peak, alongside their omnimovement plus the unique melee animations at certain points. Sad that we'll never see something like this ever again after 2042. Everything dialed back.
I love how DICE took their sweet time researching the optics of tanks, even though they have no effect on the zeroing of your shots. BFV is honestly their highly technical game they did. Shame that entry and exit animations that started in BF1, improved in BFV, and stopped in 2042 due to community feedback, with many preferring the BF4/3 way of entering/exiting vehicles.
I don't think that was the reason, I believe they removed it because they were rushing the HELL out of that game so they cut a lot of features. On a side note, entry animations aren't a problem it's the exit animations that I'm sure are pretty debated.
The Valentine Archer AT-Gun uses its gun as a speed booster due to the British Engineering never thought about using rocket engine for better speed control. Short version: Valentine Archer AT-Gun as the gun facing the back and the driver always get his head bonked by empty bullet shell casing ejected from the big gun. What you saw is the driver driving in reverse, not forward.
![Battlefield 4 - All Levolution Events [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0WakZu-JR-A/mqdefault.jpg)
If you know others that like this sort of content (animations comparisons etc.), sharing with them helps a lot!
My Playlist with Game Finishers & Takedown Animations: ruclips.net/p/PLHIRd7nyZ1j1sWy6BW_CyuC36PsQwryCY
My Playlist with Weapon Animations: ruclips.net/p/PLHIRd7nyZ1j3DGEiCf4kMfTRCnizDpufV
The multiplayer aspect of getting footage for these animations must’ve been difficult. I appreciate the effort.
If only the game was better
@@picklerick2.05 BFV better than BF1...
@@moon_september BFV maps are too big. Everyone is too spread out in Conquest.
@@LarryWaterthere should be a battlefield game with an entire planet of scale
@@JNJNRobin1337If you want something like that if recommend a game called “Planetside 2”. It’s not a whole planet but goddamn are the maps big.
Hell yeah thanks for archiving these animations for us.
Thanks for covering this! I always love first person interactions being animated.
They were right about BFV without HUD, it's immersive as hell
I’ve started playing again after a long time. I used to think the maps were empty and had no vibrancy or ambiance, I was so wrong. This game is so damn cinematic.
Every battlefield game is
BFV was probably the most technically impressive entry that DICE ever made. The amount of work put into the animations and details must’ve been huge
It's amazing what a leap back they made at 2042.
Yep, it was their peak, alongside their omnimovement plus the unique melee animations at certain points.
Sad that we'll never see something like this ever again after 2042. Everything dialed back.
I love how DICE took their sweet time researching the optics of tanks, even though they have no effect on the zeroing of your shots. BFV is honestly their highly technical game they did.
Shame that entry and exit animations that started in BF1, improved in BFV, and stopped in 2042 due to community feedback, with many preferring the BF4/3 way of entering/exiting vehicles.
I don't think that was the reason, I believe they removed it because they were rushing the HELL out of that game so they cut a lot of features.
On a side note, entry animations aren't a problem it's the exit animations that I'm sure are pretty debated.
It's so fun when planes spawn camp you and can't use vehicles for the rest of the match
I have been watching you since 2 years ago you are by forever my favorite “animation” RUclipsr I love your hard work
That Valentines AA Firing somehow reminds me of the
"Red alert Hell march"
That damn Stuka ruining your filming!
Always wished we had gotten the skis in mp
I just wish the parachute mechanics weren’t so bad in this game with fall damage being so heavy. And that plane bail outs didn’t take so long to do.
YOOO I GUESS THE THUMBNAIL RIGHT DESPITE NEVER PLAYING BATTLEFIELD LETS GOOO
I appreciate games that have vehicle animations 👍
I like these animations better than 2042 and the melee takes are brutal
“You can’t be a gunner and a driver at the same time”
Battlefield V: yeah?
Call of Duty Devs need to see this!!!!
Its sad that never happened in BF2042
Many people didn't like these animations apparently and preferred the BF4 way of vehicle entry and exit. Heck BF1 also got grilled because of this.
@@rosaria8384 Yeah well fuck 'em. They shouldn't be able to just hop out of something instantly.
@@rosaria8384 sad BFV had not enough of that. I mean, have u seen how we reloaded with the anti-tank cannon?
NOW THIS IS WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT!!!
The STuG IV is so cursed in this game 🤮
The Stug is begging the player to attach the long 75mm
A Game kill by Pr nightmare and Bad decitions.
I love this game
The Valentine Archer AT-Gun uses its gun as a speed booster due to the British Engineering never thought about using rocket engine for better speed control.
Short version: Valentine Archer AT-Gun as the gun facing the back and the driver always get his head bonked by empty bullet shell casing ejected from the big gun. What you saw is the driver driving in reverse, not forward.
You forgot Opel Blitz
Can you please do all the weapons from ghost recon Wildlands?
Can you that but for BF2042?
I have never seen these, way too hard to get a vehicle in thsi game
Its actually easy you just gotta be fast, not to mention they spawn in objectives sometimes
@@Yeahimman32 Especially on Iwo jima u literally get LVTs on the American ships when u spawn in
マッチ中にこれやって戦車枠潰すとかクソすぎる
second:)
First?