HFNH 2013 Hanomag WD Pflüge
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
- Flächenleistung 1920: Hanomag WD-Kleinpflug und WD-Großpflug auf den Historischen Feldtagen Nordhorn 2013. Der Großpflug holt aus einem 15,1 Liter Benzinmotor satte 80PS. Der Kleinpflug hat 35PS aus 5,7 Liter Hubraum.
…. Самоходные плуги … никогда не видел такой техники. Это просто праздник , сохранить старую технику в рабочем состоянии , да ещё такое разнообразие. Почёт и уважение ! …
Even today these old work horses continue to awe onlookers while they labor along. Thank you for sharing this with all of us!
Fantastisch, diese Maschinen werden in hundert Jahren immer noch funktionieren.alte Schönheiten
dette var i ypperste klasse den gang de var å få kjøpt.fantastisk å se folk som tar vare på de
Cool post . Thanks ! Man that is really rich looking dirt!
Sweet sounding engine and effortless pulling the plough - Hanomag was/is a great machine
Pity the ploughs were hardly in the ground. And the engines seemed to be labouring even then. No wonder these tractors didn't survive.
@@ausmint2926 Not going 3-4 inches deep.
@@ausmint2926 the ploughts shouldnt go deeper. i think the main reason why these didnt survive is, that this tractor isnt really a traktor, it is just a plow which can drive itself. better than steam engines on the sides of the field towing the plow form one side to the other, but i would like to use my machine for more than just one thing while i can use others for way more things
Can you imagine how modern these must have looked in their time
عجيب'هدشي'عندكم
Utter science fiction
almost alien
Tan fanático de los tractores antiguo y no los.habia visto son una maravilla de los antiguos
Thank you for the video
Old
4:25 must have an internal ring gear in the wheel hub with drive pinion, being enclosed that way.
Those 2 WD's are awesome tractors.
Now that's pretty dang cool!!
Bellissimo video 🌻
amazing machines.
How did they get back home to the barn with those iron wheels? Or did these tractors stay in shelters in the fields? Or did they change wheels after work?
Pretty much all "roads" were just dirt tracks back then, towns would have cobble stone streets. So they would have just drove them. Thee days they truck them from show to show.
1:30 makes it easy to do oil changes.
Lindos los tractores, me ase falta uno para trabajar la tierra
Фантастическая техника!
Идеальный минимализм!
I would bet after a long day on one of those machines nobody had to sing the operators to sleep.
I take it this is a petrol powered tractor. I would not want to put in 10 hours in the fields with that thing. I suppose it was a lot faster than a mule powered machine.
Und Sie rocken den Acker ! Schönes Video !!
E dopo si dice che l'ingegneria di oggi ha superato ogni aspettativa su ogni macchina... Guardate questa macchina un aratro semovente.... Questa è ingegneria.......
ÄÄ
Vf ko8778cÜ
Fantastic machines
Fantastic.
I can see why this style of tractor didn't catch on very well.
Muito bom.
Arbeitsqualität und Arbeitstiefe waren damals noch kein Thema wie man sieht. Ciao Hans.
Bei so einer Vorführung wird ja nicht so gepflügt wie damals, als die Maschinisten tagelang nichts anderes machten. Laut damaligen Berichten waren die Landwirte sehr zufrieden mit der Arbeit. Oder bekommen Sie mit einem Pferd eine bessere Furche gezogen?
@@kakadu2314 Sogar eine viel bessere Furche 😊😊😊
@@herbertprzybilla8594 ja, aber pro weg nur eine und nicht 5, und höchstens halbes tempo...somit ca.10x so viel Zeitaufwand....ist das eine bessere Furche " wert"?
ob von Hand ungepflegt so viel bessere Qualität hat? ganz abgesehen vom 100fachen Zeitaufwand...
The field got ploughed for free.
Somehow they look intimidating.
Those are really cool
1:00 А нельзя под водителем площадку придумать,чтобы не дай Бог под ножи плуга не упал! Вот как на 2- ом тракторе придумано на 1:26.
По идее, под ножи он не упадёт. Там рама, которая плуг держит. Вот в ремни вмотаться может. А если назад будет падать - упадёт за плугом
Interesting design
They look like something from mad max tbh
I can see a large amount of ground getting turned. But the operator would be exhausted to the extreme.
Die Vorführung ist gut Die Pflugeinstellung dagegen ist sau schlecht 😬😬😬
Muy buenas máquinas antiguas
Také oráčky vyrábala Praga po 1 svetovej vojne
Вот такие нанотехнологии..
I don't think these were petrol engines, more likely diesel, muck more economical and long lasting.
it is a petroleum engine
Que maravilha
TOO BAD HYDRAULICS DIDNT COME OUT 30
YEARS EARLIER! WITH HYDRAULIC LIFTS AND POWER STEERING THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH EASIER TO PLOW!
يا المسلمين يا المخلصين . يا الأوفياء
Плуготрактор 💪💪💪💪🇧🇾
Самоходный плуг. Или мегамотоблок
Were other implements available?
Of the Hanomag plows there are only these two. Many other items were exhibited. www.treckerclub.de/en/
Крутой мотоблок
That’ll put muscles in your shit 💪
Самоходный плуг!
Нихуя мотоблок!
Nice!!
,.,
мотоблок на максималках 😁
Its not even turning the soil... Not to mention beating the shit out of the damn operator... No wonder it didnt survive... All the operators died from internal bleeding and quite possibly hemmoroids and severe back problems...
This is a historical fact!
Здоровые мотоблоки
Мегамотоблок.!
Now that I reconsider petrol versus diesel many of the very early tractor type vehicles were powered by petrol/ gasoline engines because diesel was not widely available. The octane ratings were very poor somewhere around the low 70s. The tractors needed tremendous gear reduction to make use of the little power the engines could produce. As you can see by the massive drive wheels on all this farm equipment, plus the tractors dead weight required two men to turn the double ring steering wheel. The true benefits of these slow clumsy pieces of equipment is doubtful. I'll take Diesel or a team of oxen.
"the tractors dead weight required two men to turn the double ring steering wheel"
eeeer NO. the lower wheel is used to lower and raise the plough blades.
also massive drive wheels has little to do with the gearing.................
You are nuts. Diesel engines are always heavier for a given displacement. They have to be. And up until the advent of computer controlled diesels with turbochargers, which is fairly recent, gasoline engines made way higher power to weight ratio, and many still do. You just gear them appropriately as the gasoline engines make their power at a higher speed. I have a 1983 Ford pickup. Your options were a 7.5 liter gasoline V8, sporting 235 hp and 395 lb ft. 8:1 compression ratio, with engine weight 650-700 lbs depending on options, and a 6.9 liter indirect injection diesel putting out 161 hp and 307 lb ft, 20.5:1 compression ratio, and weighing 1100-1200 lbs depending on accessories. This is a much, much newer machine with relatively low compression gasoline engine options.
That old tractor has 6 plow bottoms. 6. That machine was a Godsend to the people who got to operate them, and they were used on for the time, what was considered very large farms. I will take any version of mechanized farm equipment, any day, over running animals, and the vast amount of work it takes to provide and care for those animals. Even if it was just an old 4 cylinder flathead powered farm tractor with a 1 bottom plow. It's easier and faster than a team of animals.
Yes, I grew up on a farm, and while we didn't have oxen, we had horses. They aren't cheap nor are they easy to care for. I'll take putting liquid fuel in a tractor any day, even an old one.
Backer
C
O
Hanomag... Farming for the 1000 year Reich.
cursed