Benchmarking Ktor and http4k

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 дек 2024

Комментарии • 10

  • @mikegehard6402
    @mikegehard6402 5 месяцев назад +1

    Love the Big Al’s shirt!

    • @PairingWithDuncan
      @PairingWithDuncan  5 месяцев назад

      Thank you. I have a big bike ride planned this summer, so there will be more cycle attire!

    • @mikegehard6402
      @mikegehard6402 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@PairingWithDuncan enjoy! And thank you for these videos. They are a great way to see another developer’s workflow and thought process.

  • @SampatB-n2e
    @SampatB-n2e 6 месяцев назад +1

    Could share the GitRepo Link for this benchmarking snippets

    • @PairingWithDuncan
      @PairingWithDuncan  6 месяцев назад

      Certainly - its github.com/dmcg/ktor-documentation

  • @oharaandrew314
    @oharaandrew314 6 месяцев назад +3

    I assumed you'd essentially be testing Netty against Netty, and you wouldn't be able to find much of a difference, despite the limitation of the OS TCP stack. But it seems even the TechEmpwer Round 22 results support your gut feeling.

    • @PairingWithDuncan
      @PairingWithDuncan  6 месяцев назад

      Using Jetty vs Netty fell down to just where I copied the setup code from. Had I managed to get error-less results I planned to fix that, but as it’s the server that accepts the connections it turns out to have been handy that I used both, because I think it implicates the OS, not the server or library?

  • @IPad-gf8mv
    @IPad-gf8mv 6 месяцев назад +1

    Would be interesting to consider memory and CPU usage in addition?

    • @PairingWithDuncan
      @PairingWithDuncan  6 месяцев назад +1

      Ooh, yes. So many variables!

    • @IPad-gf8mv
      @IPad-gf8mv 6 месяцев назад

      There is even more, when you consider different servers and clients 😮