Hey Jeff. Question for you? I am current evaluating the Expedition SE & LE with either the 900 ACE Turbo vs non Turbo in both the 20" and 24" swt. Would really like to have your thorough analysis on which sled and motor to go with and why? Wondering if the pros outweigh the potential cons of reduced fuel economy, weight, trail performance, and future resale value. I understand that the 900 ACE non-turbo is very attractive on the resale market and am concerned if I go with a turbo, crawling at very low speeds may be not as smooth as with the non-turbo? I plan on a lot of off trail slow exploring through the woods and swamps of Alaska. Not planning on hauling a lot of weight frequently except for the occasional moose. And if you had to choose one sled setup to just creep around and explore, what would that look like, sled and motor combo? Thank you so much and I really enjoy your videos.
Glad to help. First off, the biggest difference in the SE and LE is that the Expedition SE has Air Ride suspension and the 2021 Expedition SE models have HPG Shocks - which are a big improvement over the Motion Control. After riding the SE last season, I was very impressed with the ride comfort and on it's on the fly adjustments. I had the HPGs last season and they never bottomed out once. Very important when trail/lake riding in rough conditions. As for engine choices, you get better fuel economy with the stock 900 ACE vs the Turbocharged. However, I have rode the 900 ACE for years and I prefer the Turbo personally and won't go back. It's got the extra HP and speed when and if you need it. If you're crawling through the woods, you can dial back to ECO mode for smooth throttle control. (I'm usually in sport mode 90% of the time, but when you're in deep snow and tight conditions, ECO mode is your friend) My personal favorite for crawling through the woods is a SWT. The SWT has better flotation and reverse capabilities due to its 24" track. However, a WT is still capable off trail but it can't quite keep up to a SWT. The SWTs are the real trail breakers. You also have the Skandic SWT. Even better flotation up front due to its massive underbelly But it has a LTS suspension and isn't the same ride quality on trails that the Expeditions A-Arms have. The Skandic doesn't have the 900 ACE Turbo
@@JeffreyHann If you wouldn't mind commenting on one last thing? I was wondering what your opinion of the SWT is on trail riding as compared to the 20" models? And so out of the entire lineup of Expeditions your overall pick is the Expedition SE 900 Turbo correct? Head and shoulders above the rest? Seems like you and I do a lot of the same type adventuring and riding. Thanks again!
Через неделю тоже за таким еду!))) 🔥👍
Any chance you could make a video on how you removed the sound dampener?
Hey Jeff. Question for you? I am current evaluating the Expedition SE & LE with either the 900 ACE Turbo vs non Turbo in both the 20" and 24" swt. Would really like to have your thorough analysis on which sled and motor to go with and why? Wondering if the pros outweigh the potential cons of reduced fuel economy, weight, trail performance, and future resale value. I understand that the 900 ACE non-turbo is very attractive on the resale market and am concerned if I go with a turbo, crawling at very low speeds may be not as smooth as with the non-turbo? I plan on a lot of off trail slow exploring through the woods and swamps of Alaska. Not planning on hauling a lot of weight frequently except for the occasional moose. And if you had to choose one sled setup to just creep around and explore, what would that look like, sled and motor combo? Thank you so much and I really enjoy your videos.
Glad to help. First off, the biggest difference in the SE and LE is that the Expedition SE has Air Ride suspension and the 2021 Expedition SE models have HPG Shocks - which are a big improvement over the Motion Control. After riding the SE last season, I was very impressed with the ride comfort and on it's on the fly adjustments. I had the HPGs last season and they never bottomed out once. Very important when trail/lake riding in rough conditions.
As for engine choices, you get better fuel economy with the stock 900 ACE vs the Turbocharged. However, I have rode the 900 ACE for years and I prefer the Turbo personally and won't go back. It's got the extra HP and speed when and if you need it. If you're crawling through the woods, you can dial back to ECO mode for smooth throttle control. (I'm usually in sport mode 90% of the time, but when you're in deep snow and tight conditions, ECO mode is your friend)
My personal favorite for crawling through the woods is a SWT. The SWT has better flotation and reverse capabilities due to its 24" track. However, a WT is still capable off trail but it can't quite keep up to a SWT. The SWTs are the real trail breakers. You also have the Skandic SWT. Even better flotation up front due to its massive underbelly But it has a LTS suspension and isn't the same ride quality on trails that the Expeditions A-Arms have. The Skandic doesn't have the 900 ACE Turbo
@@JeffreyHann Thank you so much Jeffrey!
@@JeffreyHann If you wouldn't mind commenting on one last thing? I was wondering what your opinion of the SWT is on trail riding as compared to the 20" models? And so out of the entire lineup of Expeditions your overall pick is the Expedition SE 900 Turbo correct? Head and shoulders above the rest? Seems like you and I do a lot of the same type adventuring and riding. Thanks again!
Do you find its worth having the turbo?
How do You like the power? is it as strong as 1200 rotax?
never drove the 1200, but this has 150hp, and the throttle response is great.
@John P Wait the adrenaline comes with 900 ace turbo? Isnt that the XRS? I though the adrenaline only came with 900 ace.
Is it fast on trails. Top speed on trails. ?.