This is BS! I have a 20 yr old version of Photoshop, and I could replicate this photo with bullet in about 10 minutes! That's about 1 foot of travel for the bullet and since a bullet fired from an AR-15 with a 16″ barrel travels at about 3,250 feet per second, he would have to be filming with shutter rate of 270 frames per second. That is not reality!
There is a problem with this photo !! Watch the video in its entirety ....... You hear the gun shot through the " Mic " and at that point Trumps arm is not even " up " or in sight / above his shoulder. At the distance of the shooter ..... you hear the bullet snap TOO LATE ! Its gone...over with. Trumps hand was still on the podium when the shot rang out. So......in the photo showing the assumed bullet passing by....... and his arm / fingers up .......that bullet was 10 miles gone by already !!! This is basic logic !
Watch the video in its entirety ....... You hear the gun shot through the " Mic " and at that point Trumps arm is not even " up " or in sight / above his shoulder. At the distance of the shooter ..... you hear the bullet snap TOO LATE ! Its gone...over with. Trumps hand was still on the podium when the shot rang out. So......in the photo showing the assumed bullet passing by....... and his arm / fingers up .......that bullet was 10 miles gone by already !!! This is basic logic !
The Times reported that Mills captured the image while shooting with a shutter speed of 1/8,000th of a second, a speed that the outlet said was “extremely fast by industry standards.” A bullet does NOT have a contrail like and airplane does. this pic is frozen at the time that frame is snaped. The bullet would NOT look like a long projectile. It would be a small spot on the pic. This looks like a plane contrail or something...NOT a bullet in air. TOO LONG
Exactly. There's no way that there are only the very small number of comments (maybe a dozen main comments) after this has been posted for 9 hours now, at the time I write this.
FDJ the 2 x'd impeached , rapist ,felon , liar , hypocrite, fraud & who could stand behind a man who once said he would date his daughter if she was not his daughter that's creepy and gross.
Not a bullet. Has to be shrapnel. Here's why: Let's assume this is NOT photo shopped. The AR rifle fires bullets at approximately 3000 feet/sec. The "bullet" is seen in the photo traveling the distance for as long as the camera shutter was open. If you look at the photo, this appears to be about one foot. That means the shutter speed would have to have been 1/3000 sec. This is way too fast for a normal photo. The shutter speed would normally be about 20 times longer. That means the bullet path would appear in the photo for about 20 feet. Even at 1/300 the bullet would show up traveling 10 feet in the picture. As further proof of this, look at the image of Trump himself. It is blurry. That means he was moving while the shutter was open. If the shutter speed was, indeed, 1/3000th of a second, his image would be very sharp indeed.
Excellent! My partner has just done the same calculations and I was looking for comments about the claimed shutter speed. I should also note that my partner is ex British army and, in 3 separate incidents, was shot in the helmet, shot in the breast plate, and hit with shrapnel in the leg. His immediate response to the photos was that it looked like a shrapnel wound, as a bullet would have been more destructive.
Doesn't look like it came from a roof in a Downward angle though. How strange🤔 I would very much like a reconstruction of the event, with a laserpointer or such showing the true angle, and compare to this picture. I bet that this bullet in this picture was NOT coming from that roof.
It’s not a bullet. It’s a UFO going by in the background. Normal camera settings wouldn’t catch a bullet in a picture. You would need a camera with super high shutter speed. Like filming in super super slow motion. Picture taken looking a little upward toward sky.
I said this when I first saw the picture. Only way not to be a downward trajectory, is the shooter had to be same level or just slightly higher than Trump. Also, photographer is taking the phot aiming upward tracer should be higher, not lower than the ear.
@@cectechss Trump was up on a big ass stage, and the cameraman was looking up at him. The building the shooter was on was only about maybe twice the height of the stage+podium, so it would actually line up to look straight when captured on camera.
I guess you guys dropped out of high school. Angle changes the perspective of where you snap your photo. I can't believe people don't know how to use their heads.
People are going ape shit cause "the bullet doesnt line up with the ear!!!" "The bullet looks like it was level with him!!!!" A. You can tell its not the shot that hit trumps ear cause trump is already putting his hand up and theres no way he wouldve been if the bullet was THAT close to him, he wouldnt have even been able to register having been shot nevermind bring his hand up. B. The cameraman had his camera angled slightly upwards, and the shooter being about 450 feet away wouldve only had to angle slightly downard because that warehouse wasnt very tall, so what do you get? Bullet path looks level.
Yeah. RUclips has been getting really stinky lately about anything anti-tRump. I've gotten a few "warnings" in the past couple of weeks about supposedly "hateful" or "aggressive" comments but they refuse to show me what comments I made that were hateful or aggressive. I haven't made any such thing. This is getting to be on par with Elmo's Twitter.
Isn't there a news station or public person that was taking video of the speech - to examine frame by frame and find the bullet also?? Did the bullet come from facing or from behind?? Where does the water tower sit that may have had a person shooting from? The photographer said he was getting the flag in with Trump and he finds the bullet shot. Where is the flag in the photo?
So did the bullet come from the opposite side of the way he was looking. I though it came from the direction he was looking at, because every one looked that way when he went under?
So was that bullet ever recovered? With so many people seated behind him, and the bullet coming down from a gunman situated on a roof, I have to wonder if that bullet hit one of the people who was injured or killed. This photo should give the investigators a sense of the trajectory, or using a laser to determine the trajectory may be possible also. It's hard to believe it didn't hit anybody else considering how tightly the people were sitting together behind him.
Thank you 😂 skip all the propaganda lol (it's best to watch them on mute! Try it) and remember you're a world champion 🏆 don't let your memes be dreams 💪🏆❤️
Shot from an elevated position... Hmmmm, why does the bullet show like it was from a more level position, not elevated and shows below the ear? If the picture is even real!
@silentquivis The cameraman was standing in front of the stage that Trump was on. That's it, Trump was on a stage and the shooter would've been shooting slightly downwards and the camera aimed upwards, so it would look level.
If that pattern is real, the shooter and Trump were at the same altitude. And at 3000 fps which is the speed of a 5.56, this can be verified against the camera’s shutter speed. Either way, I call BS.
Speaking as an experienced rifleman, I am amazed that nobody has spotted what this remarkable photo is telling us. That bullet vortex is almost parallel to Trumps head. There is a slight downward projection of the bullet vortex but it is no way consistent with a bullet fired from that height of elevated position at only 130 metres. It demonstrates a much shallower angle of incidence such as is created from a bullet fired 500 metres away, perhaps from the roof of the sportsclub which was closed to the public because it was a Saturday. I simply cannot believe that nobody seems to have remarked on this quite obvious anomaly.
@@maximusolivia9982 Possible of course but I cannot see what the motivation for doctoring the photo would be? As far as I can determine the photographer was directly under Trump when he took it.
@@jamesfairmind2247 Using the top of the podium as a square reference rather than the edge of the screen, you'll notice the trail is at a slight angle consistent with what would be expected from a small elevation difference over 140 yards (420 feet). Keep in mind that he was on a single story building that looks to be about 12 feet high and Trump was on a podium that's about 6 feet high. That's a mere 6 foot elevation change even without considering ground elevation differences. According to trigonometry, Tan(θ) = Opposite / Adjacent. The resulting angle of a triangle 420 feet long and 6 feet high is 0.8 degrees. It's not even 1 degree which is almost imperceptible.
The Times reported that Mills captured the image while shooting with a shutter speed of 1/8,000th of a second, a speed that the outlet said was “extremely fast by industry standards.” A bullet does NOT have a contrail like and airplane does. this pic is frozen at the time that frame is snaped. The bullet would NOT look like a long projectile. It would be a small spot on the pic. This looks like a plane contrail or something...NOT a bullet in air. TOO LONG
comment le tireur a t il su sur quel toit il doit monter, parce qu il y avait des tireurs professionnels pour proteger le president? c est une nourriture pour une theorie de comment mener un coup d etat
Complete and utter Bullshit A gen ex military photographer, will tell you ,20 fps , professional modern camera..... Will never catch a 100m/s (super sonic ...) bullet in a single frame Another US falrytail.
OK folks, let's have a little refresher course on basic geometry "The level path of the object indicates it does not line up with the shooter." FALSE. A slope of 20/450 would be pretty flat. It would produce an angle of arctan (20/450) or 2.5 degrees, a very flat angle. "The path of the fragment does not line up with the top of the ear." FALSE. The cameraman is not at the same level as Trump's head. He is lookin up at a steep angle. What could that angle be? Well, if the bullet appears to line up two inches below the top of the ear, and his head is 6 inches wide, the angle would be arctan(2/6) or 18 degrees, which looks about right. The cameraman was looking up at an angle of 18 degrees.
Geometry ? How about reaction time ??? Watch the video in its entirety ....... You hear the gun shot through the " Mic " and at that point Trumps arm is not even " up " or in sight / above his shoulder. At the distance of the shooter ..... you hear the bullet snap TOO LATE ! Its gone...over with. Trumps hand was still on the podium when the shot rang out. So......in the photo showing the assumed bullet passing by....... and his arm / fingers up .......that bullet was 10 miles gone by already !!! This is basic logic !
Something doesn't look right: The path of the bullet looks too low to wound the top of the ear; it would have wounded the BOTTOM of the ear. -- I wonder if the streak in the photo was caused by something else, such as a microscopic scratch on the camera lens. -- Furthermore, the path of the bullet looks almost parallel to the top of the lectern.
@@rubenoteiza9261 -- It may not be worth investigating: The researchers would have to ask the cameraman to release his equipment for examination, which could become complicated.
@@matthewmccormick5459 The more one thinks about the more complicated it gets. If the kid acted alone why did he keep firing, thus committing suicide...? If not, why the fail...? (I got deleted the last time I made that comment).
@@rubenoteiza9261 --- An assassination mission, by nature, is a suicide mission. Therefore, once the first shot is fired, the assassin is committed to keep shooting until the mission has been accomplished.
@@MahkyVmedia1 thank you very much for that term - now I remember I have heard of it, but didn't understand what it neant. Thank you for this! Isn't there a way for the developers to block if not all, then at least most of them, is that really so hard, or is this made intentionally:?
@@nikolayvelikov4133 that's how shows like Candice Owens and Ben Shapiro get millions of views instantly within minutes of a new episode or how they'll get millions of views immediately on Twitter. Nobodys actually a fan of that shit
The vapour trail would continue throughout the whole frame. Any gun video demonstrating vapour trails had a trail that follows the bullet for 100’s of yards. Kind of odd how this trail dissipates a few inches behind the bullet, don’t ya think? I believe it’s more fake than real
@@stereotypespecialist yeah, because vapour trails instantly evaporate not even 0.001 seconds after the bullet has condensed the air. Physics says no. At the very least you would see air distortion where the vapour condenses to water (condensation is an exothermic reaction, therefore has to release heat to convert to a liquid), and that’s assuming that it’s physically possible to do it that quickly, which it’s not. This is total bs dude. Physics can’t be changed, but photos can. I have a feeling you don’t totally understand what is going on…
The New York Times posted the photo with an article. It was taken by a NYT photographer. Are you saying that the New York Times is on Donald Trump's side and making up stories to help him?
Remember we recently had a body cam footage the most we've seen since. Of course if it was Biden we'd hear it by now and where the bullet went if it missed.
This makes no sense. The only rational explanation -keeping in mind the speed a bullet flies- is that this was a very lucky picture; the man was just doing his job, taking pictures, and later on he realized his camera had captured the bullet AFTER hitting Trump's ear. There is no human way to hear a shot and, fast as you may react, take a photograph that captures that very same bullet. No way. Now, I wonder why he'd made up such a story, instead of just saying: "Well, I got lucky!" I also wonder why he'd set up his camera with such a low ISO and such a high shutter speed (which should be required to capture a bullet flying) in a bright day, beautiful sunlight, and shooting (excuse me here) at a non-moving figure as is a person simply talking, a few feet away. No sense. No logic.
Do you believe that Joe Biden has been capable of being president for the last four years. He was showing signs of dementia over 4 years ago. He's been getting a lot of help.
Since yt is deleting I try smaller comments: PART 1: "3 shots were fired. The picture was made as we could hear the second shot. By that it becomes impossible to capture the first and second shot on the picture. So the only possibility is to capture the third shot with the picture. But if that is the case then the sound must come after a specific delay. If that delay does not match then the picture must be wrong. This is what I calculated: Distance: 400 feet 121.92m Bulletspeed AR-15: 2800 feet/second 853.44m/s = 0.85344m/ms Speed of sound: 343m/s 0.343m/ms Time for the bullet to reach the target: 121.92m / 0.85344m/ms = 142.86ms Time for the sound to reach the target: 121.92m / 0.343m/ms = 355.45ms"
PART 2: "Amount of time away for the next shot to be fired so that it comes in with the sound of the shot before: 355.45ms - 142.86ms = 212.59ms This means in the moment the sound reaches the target the bullet is already far away. Which means there must be a 212.59ms delay between the second and the third shot for the photo to be true. And after the third bullet reaches its target the sound of the third bullet must come 212.59ms later. RUclips video check: Slowing down by 0.25 meaning (1/4). Result from the second shot sound to the third shot sound: 3.2s = 3200ms Convert into original speed (meaning /4): 3200ms / 4 = 800ms. Ratio between expected delay: 800ms / 212.59ms = 3.76 800ms - 212.59ms = 587.41ms So the time it took for the next shot is more than 3x the expected delay. Let's say I miscounted let's be generous here too. And say it took 2.5s instead of 3.2s Then we have 2500ms / 4 = 625ms Ratio: 625ms / 212.59ms = 2.94 625ms - 212.59ms = 412.41ms Even then it took a lot longer then it should. Additionally let's check how much aways the bullet is after just 50ms after reaching the target. So it reaches the target at: 142.86ms and we want 50ms more so we got: 192.86ms 192.86ms * 0.85344m/ms = 164.59m 164.59m - 121.92m = 42.67m So it is not possible to capture that shot." --- Correct me if I calculated wrongly or used wrong Information.
@@theoverseer393 I'm speaking about the video in alignment with the photo though. What does that have to do with with my calculations? The photo captured a shot. You can find the position of trump in any of the videos which had filmed it. At the frames which align with the photo you hear the sound of the second shot. And since the bullet is nearly 3x faster than sound it is impossible that the bullet on the image can be the second bullet. That means it could only be the third bullet. But if that is true then the sound must be heard after a certain delay which is 212.59ms with a bit of inaccuracy. But it came 600-800ms later. That's quite the big difference there.
Why do people believe The NY Times would photoshop this picture to help trump
You still are operating under that old two-party paradigm that is virtually 20 years extinct at least.
How do you know it was photoshopped?
Because they don't accept this out-dated, polarized, two-party smoke screen you obviously still believe in.
@@williammastrocola7695Because Trump will do anything to be back in the White House.
Because he looked like a bad arse and they hate it
This is BS! I have a 20 yr old version of Photoshop, and I could replicate this photo with bullet in about 10 minutes! That's about 1 foot of travel for the bullet and since a bullet fired from an AR-15 with a 16″ barrel travels at about 3,250 feet per second, he would have to be filming with shutter rate of 270 frames per second. That is not reality!
There is a problem with this photo !! Watch the video in its entirety ....... You hear the gun shot through the " Mic " and at that point Trumps arm is not even " up " or in sight / above his shoulder. At the distance of the shooter ..... you hear the bullet snap TOO LATE ! Its gone...over with. Trumps hand was still on the podium when the shot rang out. So......in the photo showing the assumed bullet passing by....... and his arm / fingers up .......that bullet was 10 miles gone by already !!! This is basic logic !
I thought the same thing. Not sure what his shutter speed was.
Watch the video in its entirety ....... You hear the gun shot through the " Mic " and at that point Trumps arm is not even " up " or in sight / above his shoulder. At the distance of the shooter ..... you hear the bullet snap TOO LATE ! Its gone...over with. Trumps hand was still on the podium when the shot rang out. So......in the photo showing the assumed bullet passing by....... and his arm / fingers up .......that bullet was 10 miles gone by already !!! This is basic logic !
@@MrDoucettegary Shutter speed ?? And that would be as fast as a bullet ?
The Times reported that Mills captured the image while shooting with a shutter speed of 1/8,000th of a second, a speed that the outlet said was “extremely fast by industry standards.” A bullet does NOT have a contrail like and airplane does. this pic is frozen at the time that frame is snaped. The bullet would NOT look like a long projectile. It would be a small spot on the pic. This looks like a plane contrail or something...NOT a bullet in air. TOO LONG
ABC7 is delegating comments. Always double check. FJB
Exactly. There's no way that there are only the very small number of comments (maybe a dozen main comments) after this has been posted for 9 hours now, at the time I write this.
Not ABC but you tube's parent company Google. They love to shadow ban right leaning comments.
Psyop
Delegating to who ?
Or did you mean deleting ?😮
FDJ the 2 x'd impeached , rapist ,felon , liar , hypocrite, fraud & who could stand behind a man who once said he would date his daughter if she was not his daughter that's creepy and gross.
hmmmmm.. traveled level, yet fired from a downward angle...
Camera angle bud where's your high school diploma?
Do you know what a 20ft x 450ft slope looks like? It's pretty level.
@@hexahexametermeter Also the stage was elevated...........
No...the "shooter" was elevated. Nice try tho
It was 4 or 5 steps on the stage. Well below the roof level. Yall crazy 😅
Not a bullet. Has to be shrapnel. Here's why: Let's assume this is NOT photo shopped. The AR rifle fires bullets at approximately 3000 feet/sec. The "bullet" is seen in the photo traveling the distance for as long as the camera shutter was open. If you look at the photo, this appears to be about one foot. That means the shutter speed would have to have been 1/3000 sec. This is way too fast for a normal photo. The shutter speed would normally be about 20 times longer. That means the bullet path would appear in the photo for about 20 feet. Even at 1/300 the bullet would show up traveling 10 feet in the picture. As further proof of this, look at the image of Trump himself. It is blurry. That means he was moving while the shutter was open. If the shutter speed was, indeed, 1/3000th of a second, his image would be very sharp indeed.
Excellent! My partner has just done the same calculations and I was looking for comments about the claimed shutter speed.
I should also note that my partner is ex British army and, in 3 separate incidents, was shot in the helmet, shot in the breast plate, and hit with shrapnel in the leg. His immediate response to the photos was that it looked like a shrapnel wound, as a bullet would have been more destructive.
the camera filmed at 1/8000
Doesn't look like it came from a roof in a Downward angle though.
How strange🤔
I would very much like a reconstruction of the event, with a laserpointer or such showing the true angle, and compare to this picture.
I bet that this bullet in this picture was NOT coming from that roof.
Why are u Dems such conspiracy theorists. I bet you believe sandy hook was a hoax too?
It’s not a bullet. It’s a UFO going by in the background. Normal camera settings wouldn’t catch a bullet in a picture. You would need a camera with super high shutter speed. Like filming in super super slow motion. Picture taken looking a little upward toward sky.
I said this when I first saw the picture. Only way not to be a downward trajectory, is the shooter had to be same level or just slightly higher than Trump. Also, photographer is taking the phot aiming upward tracer should be higher, not lower than the ear.
@@cectechss Trump was up on a big ass stage, and the cameraman was looking up at him. The building the shooter was on was only about maybe twice the height of the stage+podium, so it would actually line up to look straight when captured on camera.
I guess you guys dropped out of high school. Angle changes the perspective of where you snap your photo. I can't believe people don't know how to use their heads.
People are going ape shit cause "the bullet doesnt line up with the ear!!!" "The bullet looks like it was level with him!!!!" A. You can tell its not the shot that hit trumps ear cause trump is already putting his hand up and theres no way he wouldve been if the bullet was THAT close to him, he wouldnt have even been able to register having been shot nevermind bring his hand up. B. The cameraman had his camera angled slightly upwards, and the shooter being about 450 feet away wouldve only had to angle slightly downard because that warehouse wasnt very tall, so what do you get? Bullet path looks level.
Wow. they deleted all the comments. Theres only 175 comments here now.
Yeah. RUclips has been getting really stinky lately about anything anti-tRump.
I've gotten a few "warnings" in the past couple of weeks about supposedly "hateful" or "aggressive" comments but they refuse to show me what comments I made that were hateful or aggressive. I haven't made any such thing. This is getting to be on par with Elmo's Twitter.
Isn't there a news station or public person that was taking video of the speech - to examine frame by frame and find the bullet also?? Did the bullet come from facing or from behind?? Where does the water tower sit that may have had a person shooting from?
The photographer said he was getting the flag in with Trump and he finds the bullet shot. Where is the flag in the photo?
So did the bullet come from the opposite side of the way he was looking. I though it came from the direction he was looking at, because every one looked that way when he went under?
Totally agree
So was that bullet ever recovered? With so many people seated behind him, and the bullet coming down from a gunman situated on a roof, I have to wonder if that bullet hit one of the people who was injured or killed. This photo should give the investigators a sense of the trajectory, or using a laser to determine the trajectory may be possible also. It's hard to believe it didn't hit anybody else considering how tightly the people were sitting together behind him.
Other people actually died that day 😔
We lose a lotta good people
0:59 ~
Thank you 😂 skip all the propaganda lol (it's best to watch them on mute! Try it) and remember you're a world champion 🏆 don't let your memes be dreams 💪🏆❤️
Shot from an elevated position... Hmmmm, why does the bullet show like it was from a more level position, not elevated and shows below the ear? If the picture is even real!
@@silentquivis of course that could've been the 2nd or 3rd bullet. I'm saying the 2nd shooter was at a lower level! The main shooter!!!
@silentquivis The cameraman was standing in front of the stage that Trump was on. That's it, Trump was on a stage and the shooter would've been shooting slightly downwards and the camera aimed upwards, so it would look level.
Here are some high school drop outs on here.😂😂😂
@@silentquivis This whole thing was something that I thought was right up Michael Flynn's alley. Him and & Stone.
Check the angle of the bullet. If shot from a roof top, wrong angle.
If that pattern is real, the shooter and Trump were at the same altitude. And at 3000 fps which is the speed of a 5.56, this can be verified against the camera’s shutter speed. Either way, I call BS.
Unidentified Flying Object
The image of whoever posted that online could be photoshopped, but the situation is real.
GRAVITY makes it loose altitude at a rate of 32 ft per second per second (that was not a studder = 32 ft/sec/sec)
Psyop
@@Kortex_Racingyepninwas thinking about foto shop too
0:55 UFO
Sony imaging sensor.
So is anyone going to say anything about no wound no medical report!!!!!!!
Speaking as an experienced rifleman, I am amazed that nobody has spotted what this remarkable photo is telling us. That bullet vortex is almost parallel to Trumps head. There is a slight downward projection of the bullet vortex but it is no way consistent with a bullet fired from that height of elevated position at only 130 metres. It demonstrates a much shallower angle of incidence such as is created from a bullet fired 500 metres away, perhaps from the roof of the sportsclub which was closed to the public because it was a Saturday. I simply cannot believe that nobody seems to have remarked on this quite obvious anomaly.
You neeed to consider that the photo might have been taken off angle and corrected to what we see in the image.
@@maximusolivia9982 Possible of course but I cannot see what the motivation for doctoring the photo would be? As far as I can determine the photographer was directly under Trump when he took it.
@@jamesfairmind2247
Using the top of the podium as a square reference rather than the edge of the screen, you'll notice the trail is at a slight angle consistent with what would be expected from a small elevation difference over 140 yards (420 feet). Keep in mind that he was on a single story building that looks to be about 12 feet high and Trump was on a podium that's about 6 feet high. That's a mere 6 foot elevation change even without considering ground elevation differences. According to trigonometry, Tan(θ) = Opposite / Adjacent.
The resulting angle of a triangle 420 feet long and 6 feet high is 0.8 degrees. It's not even 1 degree which is almost imperceptible.
I agree, I can't see how at that trajectory that the bullet could have hit the top of his right ear either.
12 feet to the top of that roof. 5 ft stage with 6 ft tall trump. Thats pretty much straight at that distance
The angle and proximity are suspect and should be questioned
You should go back to school
The Times reported that Mills captured the image while shooting with a shutter speed of 1/8,000th of a second, a speed that the outlet said was “extremely fast by industry standards.” A bullet does NOT have a contrail like and airplane does. this pic is frozen at the time that frame is snaped. The bullet would NOT look like a long projectile. It would be a small spot on the pic. This looks like a plane contrail or something...NOT a bullet in air. TOO LONG
comment le tireur a t il su sur quel toit il doit monter, parce qu il y avait des tireurs professionnels pour proteger le president?
c est une nourriture pour une theorie de comment mener un coup d etat
Does anyone believe a regular camera can capture a bullet in flight? You need special high speed cameras to capture the image.
And you don't think professional photographers brought a professional camera to an event?
Complete and utter Bullshit A gen ex military photographer, will tell you ,20 fps , professional modern camera..... Will never catch a 100m/s (super sonic ...) bullet in a single frame Another US falrytail.
Dont be-lie-ve what you see on Tel-lie-vision
OK folks, let's have a little refresher course on basic geometry
"The level path of the object indicates it does not line up with the shooter." FALSE. A slope of 20/450 would be pretty flat. It would produce an angle of arctan (20/450) or 2.5 degrees, a very flat angle.
"The path of the fragment does not line up with the top of the ear." FALSE. The cameraman is not at the same level as Trump's head. He is lookin up at a steep angle. What could that angle be? Well, if the bullet appears to line up two inches below the top of the ear, and his head is 6 inches wide, the angle would be arctan(2/6) or 18 degrees, which looks about right. The cameraman was looking up at an angle of 18 degrees.
Geometry ? How about reaction time ??? Watch the video in its entirety ....... You hear the gun shot through the " Mic " and at that point Trumps arm is not even " up " or in sight / above his shoulder. At the distance of the shooter ..... you hear the bullet snap TOO LATE ! Its gone...over with. Trumps hand was still on the podium when the shot rang out. So......in the photo showing the assumed bullet passing by....... and his arm / fingers up .......that bullet was 10 miles gone by already !!! This is basic logic !
It's called photo shopped
Something doesn't look right: The path of the bullet looks too low to wound the top of the ear; it would have wounded the BOTTOM of the ear. -- I wonder if the streak in the photo was caused by something else, such as a microscopic scratch on the camera lens. -- Furthermore, the path of the bullet looks almost parallel to the top of the lectern.
At most. Many people have noticed this but I dont see an expert addressing this point.
@@rubenoteiza9261 -- It may not be worth investigating: The researchers would have to ask the cameraman to release his equipment for examination, which could become complicated.
@@matthewmccormick5459 The more one thinks about the more complicated it gets. If the kid acted alone why did he keep firing, thus committing suicide...? If not, why the fail...? (I got deleted the last time I made that comment).
@@rubenoteiza9261 --- An assassination mission, by nature, is a suicide mission. Therefore, once the first shot is fired, the assassin is committed to keep shooting until the mission has been accomplished.
@@matthewmccormick5459 Yeah, tell that to John Kennedy.
1:02 his hand looks fake
Whatever in the pictures didn't hit the upper part of the ear🤔
Why is this clip full of bots?!?!
That's what the Internet is dead means. It's 90% bots now
@@MahkyVmedia1 thank you very much for that term - now I remember I have heard of it, but didn't understand what it neant. Thank you for this! Isn't there a way for the developers to block if not all, then at least most of them, is that really so hard, or is this made intentionally:?
@@nikolayvelikov4133 that's how shows like Candice Owens and Ben Shapiro get millions of views instantly within minutes of a new episode or how they'll get millions of views immediately on Twitter. Nobodys actually a fan of that shit
@@MahkyVmedia1 i find such things to be very dangerous
@@nikolayvelikov4133 oh God you're a bot too WTF tho this was hilarious
Why do some photos show like a hole in his jacket, like a bullet hole but others don't.
Fake
First you take away the dislike button now your taking away comments 😂 What's next?
Трампу рассекло верх уха , а пуля на этом фотошопе летит на уровне мочки .
The vapour trail would continue throughout the whole frame. Any gun video demonstrating vapour trails had a trail that follows the bullet for 100’s of yards. Kind of odd how this trail dissipates a few inches behind the bullet, don’t ya think? I believe it’s more fake than real
You don't know what you're talking about. TDS is real.
@@stereotypespecialist yeah, because vapour trails instantly evaporate not even 0.001 seconds after the bullet has condensed the air. Physics says no. At the very least you would see air distortion where the vapour condenses to water (condensation is an exothermic reaction, therefore has to release heat to convert to a liquid), and that’s assuming that it’s physically possible to do it that quickly, which it’s not. This is total bs dude. Physics can’t be changed, but photos can. I have a feeling you don’t totally understand what is going on…
as with planes, trails depend on air humidity. So results would differ.
NOT REAL PHOTO SHOPPED
Yeah it is "fake photo shopped" in other words it is real
The New York Times posted the photo with an article. It was taken by a NYT photographer. Are you saying that the New York Times is on Donald Trump's side and making up stories to help him?
Yes, great, you have a photo...but has the bullet been recovered??
Has anyone bothered to look for it?? When found, it is history. Worth a considerable sum although I'd have dna tested and give to President Trump...
Remember we recently had a body cam footage the most we've seen since. Of course if it was Biden we'd hear it by now and where the bullet went if it missed.
It’s shrapnel. He was hit by shrapnel. Jesus. How stupid are we?
Shrapnel from what exactly? The teleprompter? What do you believe about Jesus anyway?
This makes no sense. The only rational explanation -keeping in mind the speed a bullet flies- is that this was a very lucky picture; the man was just doing his job, taking pictures, and later on he realized his camera had captured the bullet AFTER hitting Trump's ear. There is no human way to hear a shot and, fast as you may react, take a photograph that captures that very same bullet. No way. Now, I wonder why he'd made up such a story, instead of just saying: "Well, I got lucky!"
I also wonder why he'd set up his camera with such a low ISO and such a high shutter speed (which should be required to capture a bullet flying) in a bright day, beautiful sunlight, and shooting (excuse me here) at a non-moving figure as is a person simply talking, a few feet away. No sense. No logic.
Maybe he was there to capture brain matter exploding but they missed and all he got instead was a bullet
@@zackt4551 😅
@@zackt4551 🤣🤣
bullshit!! its photoshop
you’re bullshit
DJT used byakugan
PHOTOSHOP
🤡
It's called Sony imaging sensor.
Most developed countries recognize this as an American thing.
Its called a razor
FBI Threat Assessor was sitting behind Trump. Lady with black hat, glasses. Janeen Digiuseppi.
That's our President.
Ha! Super fake!! The whole thing Is fake!!! Just laughable😂. The public will believe anything.
It's funny how you think you're smart for thinking this is fake but really you're dumb af haha
🤡
Do you believe that Joe Biden has been capable of being president for the last four years. He was showing signs of dementia over 4 years ago. He's been getting a lot of help.
Dude with the hole in his head, does he know its fake?
Just like believing it's fake with zero evidence. Congrats on calling yourself stupid.
did they edit blood on his hand?
Dont need to edit when you can use fake blood. Were you born yesterday?
Is the News real now
Ai
Since yt is deleting I try smaller comments:
PART 1:
"3 shots were fired. The picture was made as we could hear the second shot. By that it becomes impossible to capture the first and second shot on the picture. So the only possibility is to capture the third shot with the picture. But if that is the case then the sound must come after a specific delay. If that delay does not match then the picture must be wrong. This is what I calculated:
Distance: 400 feet
121.92m
Bulletspeed AR-15: 2800 feet/second
853.44m/s = 0.85344m/ms
Speed of sound: 343m/s
0.343m/ms
Time for the bullet to reach the target:
121.92m / 0.85344m/ms = 142.86ms
Time for the sound to reach the target:
121.92m / 0.343m/ms = 355.45ms"
PART 2:
"Amount of time away for the next shot to be fired so that it comes in with the sound of the shot before:
355.45ms - 142.86ms = 212.59ms
This means in the moment the sound reaches the target the bullet is already far away.
Which means there must be a 212.59ms delay between the second and the third shot for the photo to be true.
And after the third bullet reaches its target the sound of the third bullet must come 212.59ms later.
RUclips video check: Slowing down by 0.25 meaning (1/4). Result from the second shot sound to the third shot sound:
3.2s = 3200ms
Convert into original speed (meaning /4):
3200ms / 4 = 800ms.
Ratio between expected delay:
800ms / 212.59ms = 3.76
800ms - 212.59ms = 587.41ms
So the time it took for the next shot is more than 3x the expected delay.
Let's say I miscounted let's be generous here too. And say it took 2.5s instead of 3.2s Then we have
2500ms / 4 = 625ms
Ratio: 625ms / 212.59ms = 2.94
625ms - 212.59ms = 412.41ms
Even then it took a lot longer then it should.
Additionally let's check how much aways the bullet is after just 50ms after reaching the target.
So it reaches the target at: 142.86ms and we want 50ms more so we got: 192.86ms
192.86ms * 0.85344m/ms = 164.59m
164.59m - 121.92m = 42.67m
So it is not possible to capture that shot."
---
Correct me if I calculated wrongly or used wrong Information.
@@nezz0rshutter speed, they take multiple photos
@@theoverseer393
I'm speaking about the video in alignment with the photo though.
What does that have to do with with my calculations?
The photo captured a shot. You can find the position of trump in any of the videos which had filmed it. At the frames which align with the photo you hear the sound of the second shot. And since the bullet is nearly 3x faster than sound it is impossible that the bullet on the image can be the second bullet. That means it could only be the third bullet. But if that is true then the sound must be heard after a certain delay which is 212.59ms with a bit of inaccuracy. But it came 600-800ms later. That's quite the big difference there.
As Indian we concern about democracy in America
Worry about your own country
@@LuciaAIArtthe irony that America often pokes its nose into other country's issues
Psyop
My friend said it's fake
Then ur friend needs to research
Ur friend is a moron 😂
@Kortex_Racing u need to research...
@@fallofthezombies1379 what should they research?
@@Edwardsjm naw bro. You gota go do your own research. If you are asleep then that is what it is.. bye