watch our other videos : i3 10100f gtx 1660 super minecraft 6 shaders + resourcepacks fps test : ruclips.net/video/l479djTEp7s/видео.html gtx 1050 ti vs gtx 1660 super. worth upgrading? : ruclips.net/video/SSCSV6gG6Lg/видео.html i3 10100f rx 550 ( oc ) test in 35 games : ruclips.net/video/rf-44Q29rug/видео.html i3 10100f gtx 1050 ti ( oc ) test in 35 games : ruclips.net/video/kbWNmck1jyI/видео.html I3 10100f + gtx 1660 super test in 35 games : ruclips.net/video/T4_vSiSJaTc/видео.html i3 10100f gtx 1660 super cyberpunk 2077 : ruclips.net/video/BPL9LKkQ-zY/видео.html i3 10100f gtx 1050 ti cyberpunk 2077 patch 1.04 : ruclips.net/video/6FvfUZ3pYxw/видео.html Ryzen 5 2600 gtx 1660 super part 1 test in 10 games : ruclips.net/video/UggLc-3WD_0/видео.html Ryzen 5 2600 gtx 1660 super part 2 test in 30 games : ruclips.net/video/e1wfavzIR3I/видео.html Ryzen 5 2600 gtx 1660 super part 3 test in 30 games : ruclips.net/video/u6YMJO6vspY/видео.html 2400mhz vs 3200 mhz ram test in 14 games : ruclips.net/video/lxAS0qYRN1g/видео.html Gtx 1660 super ray tracing test in 4 games : ruclips.net/video/nBE0FlTp3wQ/видео.html Nvidia Control panel High performance vs high quality : ruclips.net/video/EFJyUfjz1QI/видео.html Ryzen 5 2600 gtx 1660 super assasins creed valhalla all presets + optimized settings : ruclips.net/video/rXtHs_N03Kk/видео.html
Ryzen 5 2600 is better than i3-10100(F) for gaming, because the CPU is not as near it's 100% usage while gaming. In other words, the 2600 has a bigger margin of processing power left available. This matters because the gaming experience will feel smoother if you run something else at the same time as your game (discord, music, unexpected Windows process, background process, etc). In the future, some super-heavy (CPU-wise) game might appear, optimized for multithread, and the 2600 is 150% more powerful in multithread than the 10100(f). For the same price, the 2600 is clearly the best buy, even though the 10100(F) is slightly stronger in single-thread application. Moreover, the LGA 1200 platform allows 10th and 11th gen processors, on the intel side, and the AM4 platform allows 1000s, 2000s,3000s and 5000s series CPU. If you compare the cost and performance of the i5-11400f and the Ryzen 5 5600, right now, the winner is clearly the Ryzen 5 5600. Cheaper, stronger. Go AMD.
Fps higher only in SW: Jedi fallen order. Look at the processor load, in AC Odyssey for example. Intel - 98% processor load, AMD - 58% processor load. Also, in almost every game on Intel, the temperature is on average ~10 C higher. Upd. Sorry, only AC Odyssey has such a high CPU load.
@@zelibobaincorporated bruh. ryzen 5 2600 double the price on i3 10100. you gonna pay 100 extra dollars for 5-10 extra fps? lol. we talking about budget, and right now intel i3 10100 is by far the best budget CPU out there. AMD prices are over the roof
@@vico7013 Where I live, an AMD processor costs $ 25 more. A few months ago, the price of both processors was literally the same. I bought my r5 2600 at that time.
@The Deep'est Sushi ` the GPU Hold back the full capacity of the the CPU, doesn't matter how much %. That's a bottleneck. If he switches this gpu for a 2080 or bring the quality to low, this CPU will create more frames.
@@7heruvim7 that depends on your budget and what kind of games you wanna play. I Think the RTX 3060 Super would be a good card for play AAA games in 4k with a decent amount of frames. If you don't care about 4k, 1660 Super should be enough to play at 1080. But the main problem is to find a card to buy. Here in USA you can't find at retail prices. People are asking $1K for a 3060 that should be around $400
@@7heruvim7 I would go with a rtx 3060 / 3060 Ti and maybe even a 3070. If you are playing at 1440p then go up to a 3070, for 1080p go up to 3060 Ti. From AMD I think the upcoming models will be nice, whatever they drop in that 300-400$ slot. I currently have a ryzen 2600 and rx480. I was on a 1080p display and since you can't buy a GPU right now I upgraded to a 4k display and WOW, it instantlyade EVERY single game look way better, even running them at 1080p still. All the jagged lines and aliasing are gone. If I run it at 1440p upscaling to 4k it's breathtaking. I've taken some of the lesser intense games, take a game like Valorant and run it at 4k Vs 1440o upscale to 4k and I literally can't tell the difference. I would have to take screenshots side by side blown up to really notice it, but actually switching the settings on one display you wouldn't be able to tell which is rendering at 4k. Best thing is to buy based on your needs. If you will only have a 1080p display for the next two years then buy a 320$ rtx 3060 and then in two years replace it with like a rtx 5060 Ti which by that time would be performance equal to OR better than the current rtx 3090. You make out better buying more often Vs buying a super expensive model and keeping it a long time. Like I can buy either a 3090 or I can buy a 3080 and then in 2 years a 5080 for roughly the same price as a single 3090, but I would get way way way more performance over the course of 4/5 years for the money I spent.
Not really. I don't recall seeing any of the top sites do this. Typically CPU benchmark will have a monster GPU to avoid bottleneck and then test at a couple different resolutions. I haven't seen anyone turning settings down because that would just be stupid as nobody is going to play like that. It's very important to see how it runs at say high or ultra preset but could care less about lowers settings as it gives me less helpful data
@@drfrostybuds5288 The cpu tests are made on minimal settings with a strong gpu. This way it 0% impacts the testing, you clearly don't know what you're talking about
@@lirokangaming6937 I much rather see a test like this to see how it runs in games people play at settings they will actually use. I guess if you showed them all it couldn't hurt, but if you can only do one I much prefer how it is in this video. If you turn the settings all down, IMO it's more like a synthetic benchmark and we already have those to compare. People want to see how CPU x performs Vs CPU y at a preset they will use. It's easier to use higher settings and you can calculate from that. Imagine Intel runs game X at 44 fps & AMD at 52 fps on ultra preset and we want to play at minimum 60fps. We know AMD only needs to slightly tweak settings to hit the 60+ and Intel might be a bit more work. Using lowest settings is just pointless as nobody used that and also the results should be about the same. If Intel wins on lowest settings they probably win at highest so what's the point other than you don't help people determine how it runs at settings they actually use. Let's say by chance that intel wins at lowest settings, but then AMD wins at ultra preset, your testing wouldn't know this. Your test would only know which wins at settings literally NOBODY uses. That's why they have synthetic benchmarks
@@drfrostybuds5288 Intel wins at lowest while AMD at highest? Lol, this is some mythbusters level dogsh.t. Cpu in games does all the smart stuff like physics of everything, while the gpu only renders the graphics. The CPU tests are made at lowest settings to test the actual cpu perfomance. Game physics take the same CPU, not depending on the graphics used. CPU benchmarks are made to see which CPU is stronger and by how many %. If you need ultra settings, look up benchmaks for a specific build. I see what you are trying to say, but it hust shows more that you are clearly unexperienced in what you are talking about, and you are coming from your thoughts and not facts
@@lirokangaming6937 I disagree with you, but it doesn't matter. Nobody does test at lowest settings. I've seen several in depth cpu comparisons by gamers nexus and they aren't using lowest settings. Now they are using a GPU strong enough so that it's not bottlenecking. The only reason lower settings would help here is due to the GPU being used. Assuming we have a more than powerful enough GPU then I would do it the same way literally everyone else does which is running at settings people use. If Intel wins at lower settings, you claim they should also win at higher settings and the same for AMD. Well, if this is true then it doesn't matter if you test at higher settings. If the same company wins at lowest and highest and our GPU is more than powerful enough then it makes more sense to benchmark on higher setting which kills two birds with one stone. You see who wins while also being able to see what kind of performance you can expect at the setting most people will use.
interesting, in my country the used r5 2600 only take 50$ while the i3 10100f take 60$. Both of those processors is good, R5 2600 have more core and thread and the i3 9100f have a better single core performance and the result for gaming is simillar. And i tink those processors good for budget gaming PC. But depending for upgradeability and future proof i think R5 2600 is best choice because the support of AM4 Motherboard can be upgrade maybe till R7 5800x3d if you choose B450M/B550M while the i3 10100f have a lack upgrade and future proof, maybe if you want to upgrade maximum is i7 or i9 gen 10 and gen 11 because LGA 1200 only support for gen 10 and gen 11 intel.
Хм ну тут тестер по ощущениям даже чутка занизил возможности Ряженки, такое ощущение что на частоте у ряженки лок стоит 3625 МГц, + оператива по интеловским стандартам на 2666 даже не xmp.
U prolly should get a msi mag b460 torpedo atx or Matx motherboard they r selling it for 100 dollars on Newegg and a 550 watt psu or 600 watt psu it depends on the gpu u r using u should also get an i3 10100f because it offers the same performance as the i3 10100 without an inter grated gpu which is useless since u have a GTX 1660. It is just a few dollar difference tho
@@ldjkng6909 I think it is but honestly in my opinion I’d rather go with a different cpu cooler just to be on the safe side, also don’t get 3200mhz ram because u need a z490 motherboard to take advantage of the ram speed and those r very expensive. Your cpu and ram combination that are paired to any other motherboard that doesn’t have a z490 chipset will only have the ram run at 2666 mhz.
@@The_10mm_socket_you_lost i saw h410 mobo is good for this setup (cheap) and also this gpu and cpu combo good working with h410 mobo i will upgrade after my mobo with z490 soo WHAT do you think about this setup?
Well on all the test the 2600 runs hotter but with a 3rd party cooler both CPU's would be in the 40c's instead and i know cause my 2600 gets an average of 43c with the CM hyper 212 black edition.
@@EcksGamer Yeah, stock coolers are terrible, they're made to do the bare minimum needed to keep the CPU's from throttling and at times they even fail at that.
probably i3-10100f +rx570 8gb or rx580 8gb if you can go a bit further on your budget! amd prices have skyrocketed and normally the rx570 8gb would be abt 150 but it's actually around 200 atm
@@xdwxde5703 it depends where are you from. If usa i would check ebay for second hand gpu. And for CPU probably right now i3 is cheaper than any similar amd, so i3. If you are from europe, check this site geizhals.eu/ and compare parts prices :)
Todo depende men, a la larga tendra mas vida el 2600, ya que se sabe que ahora los 6 nucleos /12 hilos son un standard básico para poder armar buen setup... Con el paso de los años el ryzen envejecera mejor además que claramente hay juegos donde le saca hasta 20fps al 10100f.... Igual si el 2600 lo ves muy caro, te sale bien comprar un 11400f, que ese si es muy bestia... Pero eviten comprar procesadores 4 nucleos, porque no valen la pena
@@kayraxzmusicTV No estoy de acuerdo con lo último, un procesador de 4/8 sigue siendo una opcion perfectamente válida y útil para jugar. Si bien es cierto que un 6/12 es mucho mejor en el sentido de que envejecerá mejor, no implica que que los 4/8 puedan seguir siendo útiles en la mayor parte de escenarios típicos de uso. Por ejemplo, al armar un "budget PC" tiene mucho más sentido ir por una CPU de esa clase y redirigir el dinero sobrante a una GPU de mayor categoría, y en el caso contrario, tampoco tiene sentido invertir tanto en la CPU si no actualizarás pronto la GPU ya que no aprovecharás su potencial y eso resulta en dinero desperdiciado. Un ejemplo de una configuración "budget" (entre comillas, porque las GPUs están en las nubes) es un equipo con un i3 10100F y una GTX 1650S (O RX 580, 1060 6GB o 1660S) donde no tendrás bottlenecks apreciables y prácticamente puedes jugar todo lo que quieras en settings Medios (E incluso Altos o Ultra con juegos menos demandantes) alcanzando tranquilamente 60FPS. Yo no diría que eviten comprar CPUs de 4 núcleos, más bien diría que primero valoren sus necesidades y de allí tomen la decisión, porque los precios de las CPUs también fluctuan bastante y así mismo su disponibilidad (especialmente aquellas económicas de la serie F de Intel o los Unicornios 3100 o 3300X). Y si tan importante es la escalabilidad, se puede optar por una H470 o A520 para ahorrar costos y mejorar la CPU; si es que realmente es necesario (Tipo actualizar a una RTX 3000 en un lapso de tiempo cercano). Ojo, hablo exclusivamente de juegos o actividades básicas, si hablamos de tareas más especializadas como streaming, renderizado, edición, etc. entonces definitivamente es mejor invertir más en un Hexa o incluso un Octa Core, porque se trata de una herramienta de trabajo crítica en muchos casos.
@@yorchrzx creo que hoy dia es estupido defender a los 4 nucleos, y mas con la salida de BF 2042 y aparte con un R5 2600 que se puede conseguir por poco mas de 100 dolares, incluso usado vale la pena... por cierto, watch dogs legion, assasins creed valhalla, y otros muchos juegos se rien de tu argumento de que el 4 nucleos sirve.... saludos
@@kayraxzmusicTV Es estúpido fanatizarte y creer que todos tienen para gastar el dinero del mundo, por eso nos tildan de elitistas y tóxicos por creer que para jugar necesitas si o si un 5600X y si no es eso no sirve...patético. Y si, todos esos juegos perfectamente funcionan en un 4/8 bajando los settings así que tu argumento sigue siendo igual de estúpido :)
Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B450M-A II, AMD B450 (Ryzen AM4) Micro ATX Motherboard CPU: Intel CPU BX8070110100F Core i3-10100F / 3.6GHz / 6MB LGA1200 4C / 8T GPU: RX 570 Gygabyte 8gb Wifi card: Ubit AC 1200Mbps Bluetooth WiFi Card,Wireless WiFi PCIe Network Case: CiT Flash ARGB PC Gaming Case, M-ATX, 4 x 120mm ARGB Rainbow Fans Power Supply: EVGA 500 W1, 80+ WHITE 500W, Power Supply 100-W1-0500-K3, Black HDD: Western Digital WD10EZEX 1 TB PC Hard Drive - Blue SSD/ M 2: WD Green 120 GB Internal SSD M.2 SATA RAM: Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 Vengeance LPX 8 GB (1 x 8 GB) DDR4 is this good
Eu ficaria com o ryzen porque para gravar, ficar no discord e ter alguma aba do Google aberta enquanto fica jogando é muito melhor. Muito bom vídeo aliás
both work fine with the rtx 3050 but ryzen 5 2600 is 6/12 core so its better for Content Creation but for games its Almost the same perform and dont forget you can overlock the Ryzen and get more hight performance whiche you can't do with i3 10100
@@thenotsookayguy The i3 10105F is HALF the price of a R5 2600 in Australia. Average price $130 compared to $260. AMD made Intel step up their game BIG time. Having 4 physical cores and including hypethreading for 8, in an i3, is a big change. Another thing AMD had over intel was including a stock cooler, intel took note. It's only good for the consumer. The only reason to get the AMD over the Intel is if you don't have, nor want to get, a graphics card. The price and performance is just too good.
They use same socket, if you buy the right motherboard and get a good price on a 3600 you can wait for 5600 to drop and replace the 3600 with it later on
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
watch our other videos :
i3 10100f gtx 1660 super minecraft 6 shaders + resourcepacks fps test : ruclips.net/video/l479djTEp7s/видео.html
gtx 1050 ti vs gtx 1660 super. worth upgrading? : ruclips.net/video/SSCSV6gG6Lg/видео.html
i3 10100f rx 550 ( oc ) test in 35 games : ruclips.net/video/rf-44Q29rug/видео.html
i3 10100f gtx 1050 ti ( oc ) test in 35 games : ruclips.net/video/kbWNmck1jyI/видео.html
I3 10100f + gtx 1660 super test in 35 games : ruclips.net/video/T4_vSiSJaTc/видео.html
i3 10100f gtx 1660 super cyberpunk 2077 : ruclips.net/video/BPL9LKkQ-zY/видео.html
i3 10100f gtx 1050 ti cyberpunk 2077 patch 1.04 : ruclips.net/video/6FvfUZ3pYxw/видео.html
Ryzen 5 2600 gtx 1660 super part 1 test in 10 games : ruclips.net/video/UggLc-3WD_0/видео.html
Ryzen 5 2600 gtx 1660 super part 2 test in 30 games : ruclips.net/video/e1wfavzIR3I/видео.html
Ryzen 5 2600 gtx 1660 super part 3 test in 30 games : ruclips.net/video/u6YMJO6vspY/видео.html
2400mhz vs 3200 mhz ram test in 14 games : ruclips.net/video/lxAS0qYRN1g/видео.html
Gtx 1660 super ray tracing test in 4 games : ruclips.net/video/nBE0FlTp3wQ/видео.html
Nvidia Control panel High performance vs high quality : ruclips.net/video/EFJyUfjz1QI/видео.html
Ryzen 5 2600 gtx 1660 super assasins creed valhalla all presets + optimized settings : ruclips.net/video/rXtHs_N03Kk/видео.html
Nice vids dude, you deserve more views and subscribers
Ryzen 5 2600 is better than i3-10100(F) for gaming, because the CPU is not as near it's 100% usage while gaming. In other words, the 2600 has a bigger margin of processing power left available. This matters because the gaming experience will feel smoother if you run something else at the same time as your game (discord, music, unexpected Windows process, background process, etc). In the future, some super-heavy (CPU-wise) game might appear, optimized for multithread, and the 2600 is 150% more powerful in multithread than the 10100(f). For the same price, the 2600 is clearly the best buy, even though the 10100(F) is slightly stronger in single-thread application. Moreover, the LGA 1200 platform allows 10th and 11th gen processors, on the intel side, and the AM4 platform allows 1000s, 2000s,3000s and 5000s series CPU. If you compare the cost and performance of the i5-11400f and the Ryzen 5 5600, right now, the winner is clearly the Ryzen 5 5600. Cheaper, stronger. Go AMD.
Thanks for commenting. It really help
ayy bro i know that this comment is to old but if you read this which one has better single core
@@naimake-qw1oh the i3 has better single core performance
for its price. 10100f. Budget build. can add more on graphics card
:D On which one? LOL
@@FatalityOCC gtx 1050 ti gtx 1060 gtx 1650 gtx 1650 super rx 570 rx 580 gtx 970
Can I buy most cheaper mainboard for 10105f?..
The problem with going for the intel the motherboard are more expensive for it
I3 10100f best budget cpu for now
Fps higher only in SW: Jedi fallen order. Look at the processor load, in AC Odyssey for example. Intel - 98% processor load, AMD - 58% processor load. Also, in almost every game on Intel, the temperature is on average ~10 C higher.
Upd. Sorry, only AC Odyssey has such a high CPU load.
@@zelibobaincorporated yeah, ryzen 5 2600 is definitely the winner here, but for 80$ cpu i3 10100f isn't bad tho
@@zelibobaincorporated bruh. ryzen 5 2600 double the price on i3 10100. you gonna pay 100 extra dollars for 5-10 extra fps? lol. we talking about budget, and right now intel i3 10100 is by far the best budget CPU out there. AMD prices are over the roof
@@crashertube6229 intel did great job here
@@vico7013 Where I live, an AMD processor costs $ 25 more. A few months ago, the price of both processors was literally the same. I bought my r5 2600 at that time.
Nice video bro, good job!
thank you so much...!!!
@@Xtremebenchmark please tell me Your gpu overclock settings
@@bagja2705 core clock : +200mhz / memory clock + 650 mhz
@@Xtremebenchmark thanks
@@bagja2705 youre welcome bro
Man, i bought i3 10100f for 69£ last week, best deal ever! Strong processor!
yeah i'm buying it too. seems great value for only 100$.
Its aint good if in same price ryzen provides better performance in every field
@@brownieandfriends9678 but the price difference is too big, Ryzen 3100 was 110£ 2 3 weeks ago. Not worth it.
this bench is wrong, i3 is actually better
@@brownieandfriends9678 fanboy hahah look at the vid
I3 is better and cheaper
Rndm L
remember, the ryzen can be overclock'ed
if you wanna stream and have the budget buy 2600 if wanna go for budget gaming go i3 10100f
GPU is bottlenecking. You should run the games in lower quality or upgrade the GPU so we could see both cpu and gpu working at max load brother
Thanks for the suggestion brother
@The Deep'est Sushi ` the GPU Hold back the full capacity of the the CPU, doesn't matter how much %. That's a bottleneck. If he switches this gpu for a 2080 or bring the quality to low, this CPU will create more frames.
What best gpu for 5 2600? In 2021
@@7heruvim7 that depends on your budget and what kind of games you wanna play. I Think the RTX 3060 Super would be a good card for play AAA games in 4k with a decent amount of frames. If you don't care about 4k, 1660 Super should be enough to play at 1080. But the main problem is to find a card to buy. Here in USA you can't find at retail prices. People are asking $1K for a 3060 that should be around $400
@@7heruvim7 I would go with a rtx 3060 / 3060 Ti and maybe even a 3070. If you are playing at 1440p then go up to a 3070, for 1080p go up to 3060 Ti. From AMD I think the upcoming models will be nice, whatever they drop in that 300-400$ slot.
I currently have a ryzen 2600 and rx480. I was on a 1080p display and since you can't buy a GPU right now I upgraded to a 4k display and WOW, it instantlyade EVERY single game look way better, even running them at 1080p still.
All the jagged lines and aliasing are gone. If I run it at 1440p upscaling to 4k it's breathtaking.
I've taken some of the lesser intense games, take a game like Valorant and run it at 4k Vs 1440o upscale to 4k and I literally can't tell the difference. I would have to take screenshots side by side blown up to really notice it, but actually switching the settings on one display you wouldn't be able to tell which is rendering at 4k.
Best thing is to buy based on your needs. If you will only have a 1080p display for the next two years then buy a 320$ rtx 3060 and then in two years replace it with like a rtx 5060 Ti which by that time would be performance equal to OR better than the current rtx 3090.
You make out better buying more often Vs buying a super expensive model and keeping it a long time.
Like I can buy either a 3090 or I can buy a 3080 and then in 2 years a 5080 for roughly the same price as a single 3090, but I would get way way way more performance over the course of 4/5 years for the money I spent.
in my country both chips are for the same price,so i got ryzen 5 2600 because of more cores and it can handle more powerful gpu!
In my 1.7, price difference 😄
In my country ryzen 2600 is twice as expensive than intel i3 10100
@@terryong32 lol in my country, both are same price
Where you from?
and you need more speedy ram lol
The tests are inaccuarte. CPU benchmarks are made at minimal settings, so the GPU doesn't affect results
Not really. I don't recall seeing any of the top sites do this.
Typically CPU benchmark will have a monster GPU to avoid bottleneck and then test at a couple different resolutions. I haven't seen anyone turning settings down because that would just be stupid as nobody is going to play like that.
It's very important to see how it runs at say high or ultra preset but could care less about lowers settings as it gives me less helpful data
@@drfrostybuds5288 The cpu tests are made on minimal settings with a strong gpu. This way it 0% impacts the testing, you clearly don't know what you're talking about
@@lirokangaming6937 I much rather see a test like this to see how it runs in games people play at settings they will actually use.
I guess if you showed them all it couldn't hurt, but if you can only do one I much prefer how it is in this video.
If you turn the settings all down, IMO it's more like a synthetic benchmark and we already have those to compare. People want to see how CPU x performs Vs CPU y at a preset they will use. It's easier to use higher settings and you can calculate from that. Imagine Intel runs game X at 44 fps & AMD at 52 fps on ultra preset and we want to play at minimum 60fps. We know AMD only needs to slightly tweak settings to hit the 60+ and Intel might be a bit more work.
Using lowest settings is just pointless as nobody used that and also the results should be about the same. If Intel wins on lowest settings they probably win at highest so what's the point other than you don't help people determine how it runs at settings they actually use.
Let's say by chance that intel wins at lowest settings, but then AMD wins at ultra preset, your testing wouldn't know this. Your test would only know which wins at settings literally NOBODY uses. That's why they have synthetic benchmarks
@@drfrostybuds5288 Intel wins at lowest while AMD at highest? Lol, this is some mythbusters level dogsh.t. Cpu in games does all the smart stuff like physics of everything, while the gpu only renders the graphics. The CPU tests are made at lowest settings to test the actual cpu perfomance. Game physics take the same CPU, not depending on the graphics used. CPU benchmarks are made to see which CPU is stronger and by how many %. If you need ultra settings, look up benchmaks for a specific build. I see what you are trying to say, but it hust shows more that you are clearly unexperienced in what you are talking about, and you are coming from your thoughts and not facts
@@lirokangaming6937 I disagree with you, but it doesn't matter. Nobody does test at lowest settings. I've seen several in depth cpu comparisons by gamers nexus and they aren't using lowest settings.
Now they are using a GPU strong enough so that it's not bottlenecking. The only reason lower settings would help here is due to the GPU being used.
Assuming we have a more than powerful enough GPU then I would do it the same way literally everyone else does which is running at settings people use.
If Intel wins at lower settings, you claim they should also win at higher settings and the same for AMD. Well, if this is true then it doesn't matter if you test at higher settings.
If the same company wins at lowest and highest and our GPU is more than powerful enough then it makes more sense to benchmark on higher setting which kills two birds with one stone.
You see who wins while also being able to see what kind of performance you can expect at the setting most people will use.
Зашибись, пришёл посмотреть на тест процессоров, а посмотрел на тест 1660 super, нагруженной на 100 процентов почти во всех тестах
Так шо лучше то
Или райзен настолько сосет
@@Менянесуществует-з7ж лучше 10400f
@@comradwolf
райзен за 20к против i3 за 7к
стоит переходить на интел?
просто я нихуя не нахожу у амд в районе 10-15к
@@Менянесуществует-з7ж 2600 надо было брать, когда он стоил 12к. И я говорю не про i3, а про i5. Он как раз где-то 12 стоит, за свои деньги годнота
@@comradwolf Был вариант за 10к
Но я его профукал
Теперь ищу r5 3100
interesting, in my country the used r5 2600 only take 50$ while the i3 10100f take 60$. Both of those processors is good, R5 2600 have more core and thread and the i3 9100f have a better single core performance and the result for gaming is simillar. And i tink those processors good for budget gaming PC. But depending for upgradeability and future proof i think R5 2600 is best choice because the support of AM4 Motherboard can be upgrade maybe till R7 5800x3d if you choose B450M/B550M while the i3 10100f have a lack upgrade and future proof, maybe if you want to upgrade maximum is i7 or i9 gen 10 and gen 11 because LGA 1200 only support for gen 10 and gen 11 intel.
10100f сейчас стоит 7к, а 2600 11к, выбор очевиден
10100f now costs 100$, and 2600 150$, the choice is obvious
Спасибо, купил 2600
@@КАВО2 надеюсь ты его разогнал чтобы получить больше фпс чем 10100f, но если даже ты его разгонишь, то все ровно переплатишь дофига денег
да братан американцы сразу поняли что 10100f стоит 7к бачей а 2600 11к бачей
@@bigboysslimee хахахааххаха тупанул)
2600 yна озоне за 6к был недавно
No offense, but this video is useless. You need a better GPU to test these CPU's. The GTX 1660 causes a huge bottleneck.
Thanks for watching this useless video
how come it's causing a bottleneck with 56~66% usage? it's bottlenecked when its over 80% usage of CPU and he is using a gtx 1660 super
yeah but most humans will like pair it with this level of gpu though.. so its quite valid as well this test.
Are you crazy
In my two at the same price What do you recommend to buy the best for games
Would be min Details at 720p Not a Vetter choice to Benchmark Just the CPUs?
yep, there's a GPU bottleneck case in this vid :(
GPU too weak, it does not bottleneck anyone.
Yeah at least rtx 2060 / 2070 for better comparison
в каждой игре упор в видеокарту, что за тест? видеокарты? процессоры так не тестят, нужно ставить всё на минималки и в 720p.
в других видосах что i3 10100f на 20% больше показывает, а тут наоборот р5 2600 больше показывает🤷🏻♂️ вот кому верить ёпта после этого?😅
Интел в играх лучше
Хм ну тут тестер по ощущениям даже чутка занизил возможности Ряженки, такое ощущение что на частоте у ряженки лок стоит 3625 МГц, + оператива по интеловским стандартам на 2666 даже не xmp.
@@KillerbitofF кстати да, тоже заметил
gtx 1660 super i3 10100 16gb ram 3200mhz 500gb ssd this setup good for nowadays game and which mobo and psu good for this setup?
U prolly should get a msi mag b460 torpedo atx or Matx motherboard they r selling it for 100 dollars on Newegg and a 550 watt psu or 600 watt psu it depends on the gpu u r using u should also get an i3 10100f because it offers the same performance as the i3 10100 without an inter grated gpu which is useless since u have a GTX 1660. It is just a few dollar difference tho
U should also get a better cpu Cooler than the stock one like a deepcool gammaxx 400
@@The_10mm_socket_you_lost stock cpu cooler not enough for my cpu?
@@ldjkng6909 I think it is but honestly in my opinion I’d rather go with a different cpu cooler just to be on the safe side, also don’t get 3200mhz ram because u need a z490 motherboard to take advantage of the ram speed and those r very expensive. Your cpu and ram combination that are paired to any other motherboard that doesn’t have a z490 chipset will only have the ram run at 2666 mhz.
@@The_10mm_socket_you_lost i saw h410 mobo is good for this setup (cheap) and also this gpu and cpu combo good working with h410 mobo i will upgrade after my mobo with z490 soo WHAT do you think about this setup?
Now which runs hotter now? 😂✌️
Well on all the test the 2600 runs hotter but with a 3rd party cooler both CPU's would be in the 40c's instead and i know cause my 2600 gets an average of 43c with the CM hyper 212 black edition.
@@EcksGamer Yeah, stock coolers are terrible, they're made to do the bare minimum needed to keep the CPU's from throttling and at times they even fail at that.
Now i feel like getting intel but doesnt the RAM stop at 2666Mhz?
Yes, i3 10100f ram speed support up to 2666mhz
No depends on board. I can xmp auto till 3200mhz on a h410m h board
@@kasavaman007 thats good
@@kasavaman007 which brand do you have? I have a Asus prime H410m-a and it says it can go up to 2933mhz but I'm not sure about doing it.
@@vaughn3916 if it is on auto XMP profile. then it can do it. i am using gigabyte h410m H
what's in your opinion the best CPU GPU combo around 400$?
probably i3-10100f +rx570 8gb or rx580 8gb if you can go a bit further on your budget! amd prices have skyrocketed and normally the rx570 8gb would be abt 150 but it's actually around 200 atm
@@xdwxde5703 it depends where are you from. If usa i would check ebay for second hand gpu. And for CPU probably right now i3 is cheaper than any similar amd, so i3. If you are from europe, check this site geizhals.eu/ and compare parts prices :)
I3 10400f and 1660 super
At msrp. A ryzen 3300x and a 1660ti
1st gen Intel core i3 550 and RTX 3060.
Tons cual compro?
2600 o 10100?:c
No sé si habrá otra razón para comprar alguno
la que te salga mas barata, en mi pais un i3 10100f esta menos de la mitad de lo que sale el ryzen 2600. En mi caso me compre el i3 10100f claramente
Todo depende men, a la larga tendra mas vida el 2600, ya que se sabe que ahora los 6 nucleos /12 hilos son un standard básico para poder armar buen setup... Con el paso de los años el ryzen envejecera mejor además que claramente hay juegos donde le saca hasta 20fps al 10100f.... Igual si el 2600 lo ves muy caro, te sale bien comprar un 11400f, que ese si es muy bestia... Pero eviten comprar procesadores 4 nucleos, porque no valen la pena
@@kayraxzmusicTV No estoy de acuerdo con lo último, un procesador de 4/8 sigue siendo una opcion perfectamente válida y útil para jugar. Si bien es cierto que un 6/12 es mucho mejor en el sentido de que envejecerá mejor, no implica que que los 4/8 puedan seguir siendo útiles en la mayor parte de escenarios típicos de uso. Por ejemplo, al armar un "budget PC" tiene mucho más sentido ir por una CPU de esa clase y redirigir el dinero sobrante a una GPU de mayor categoría, y en el caso contrario, tampoco tiene sentido invertir tanto en la CPU si no actualizarás pronto la GPU ya que no aprovecharás su potencial y eso resulta en dinero desperdiciado. Un ejemplo de una configuración "budget" (entre comillas, porque las GPUs están en las nubes) es un equipo con un i3 10100F y una GTX 1650S (O RX 580, 1060 6GB o 1660S) donde no tendrás bottlenecks apreciables y prácticamente puedes jugar todo lo que quieras en settings Medios (E incluso Altos o Ultra con juegos menos demandantes) alcanzando tranquilamente 60FPS. Yo no diría que eviten comprar CPUs de 4 núcleos, más bien diría que primero valoren sus necesidades y de allí tomen la decisión, porque los precios de las CPUs también fluctuan bastante y así mismo su disponibilidad (especialmente aquellas económicas de la serie F de Intel o los Unicornios 3100 o 3300X). Y si tan importante es la escalabilidad, se puede optar por una H470 o A520 para ahorrar costos y mejorar la CPU; si es que realmente es necesario (Tipo actualizar a una RTX 3000 en un lapso de tiempo cercano). Ojo, hablo exclusivamente de juegos o actividades básicas, si hablamos de tareas más especializadas como streaming, renderizado, edición, etc. entonces definitivamente es mejor invertir más en un Hexa o incluso un Octa Core, porque se trata de una herramienta de trabajo crítica en muchos casos.
@@yorchrzx creo que hoy dia es estupido defender a los 4 nucleos, y mas con la salida de BF 2042 y aparte con un R5 2600 que se puede conseguir por poco mas de 100 dolares, incluso usado vale la pena... por cierto, watch dogs legion, assasins creed valhalla, y otros muchos juegos se rien de tu argumento de que el 4 nucleos sirve.... saludos
@@kayraxzmusicTV Es estúpido fanatizarte y creer que todos tienen para gastar el dinero del mundo, por eso nos tildan de elitistas y tóxicos por creer que para jugar necesitas si o si un 5600X y si no es eso no sirve...patético. Y si, todos esos juegos perfectamente funcionan en un 4/8 bajando los settings así que tu argumento sigue siendo igual de estúpido :)
Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B450M-A II, AMD B450 (Ryzen AM4) Micro ATX Motherboard
CPU: Intel CPU BX8070110100F Core i3-10100F / 3.6GHz / 6MB LGA1200 4C / 8T
GPU: RX 570 Gygabyte 8gb
Wifi card: Ubit AC 1200Mbps Bluetooth WiFi Card,Wireless WiFi PCIe Network
Case:
CiT Flash ARGB PC Gaming Case, M-ATX, 4 x 120mm ARGB Rainbow Fans
Power Supply: EVGA 500 W1, 80+ WHITE 500W, Power Supply 100-W1-0500-K3, Black
HDD: Western Digital WD10EZEX 1 TB PC Hard Drive - Blue
SSD/ M 2: WD Green 120 GB Internal SSD M.2 SATA
RAM: Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 Vengeance LPX 8 GB (1 x 8 GB) DDR4
is this good
Dude, you use AMD motherboard with Intel Processor, not gonna work
@@januwicak yeah this was a year ago its not relevant
Че за бред? У меня на 1660 и 4770 в вальгалле выдает 60+ фпс причем на высоких настройках и рдр2 больше. Может из-за рам 20 гб: 2*8 и 2*2?
Did you overlock the Ryzen?
Can you make vid about overlock VS stock again?
Sure, what games you want me to test?
Assassin creed vallhala
@@Xtremebenchmark csgo. Csgo take a lot of cpu
@@firetuga1535 thanks for the suggestion
Link
Is that the stock cpu cooler ?
Damn 0.1% switches sides with every game...
Eu ficaria com o ryzen porque para gravar, ficar no discord e ter alguma aba do Google aberta enquanto fica jogando é muito melhor. Muito bom vídeo aliás
e também oq as placas da intel são mt caras para ter um desempenho melhor
I3 10100f melhor
So... which better?
Which one better
King backs to intel core i3 👑🔥❤️
90% de uso 💀
so, can i use 3200mhz ram with the i3 10th gen or will the pc explode?
If you have h410m or b460 motherboard no need to buy 3200mhz ram
What about better grafic .
Test will be true
I bough my i3 10100f for 80€ its nice for the price
Cool
Is it good for streaming?
Its enough, but you should pick better cpu if you are serious streamer
@@Xtremebenchmark What about i5 10400F? With stock cooler though.
@@ARJUMANDBHATTT best
Who win?? Brother?
Ryzen 5 2600
Which one should i get for RTX 3050?
both work fine with the rtx 3050 but ryzen 5 2600 is 6/12 core so its better for Content Creation but for games its Almost the same perform
and dont forget you can overlock the Ryzen and get more hight performance whiche you can't do with i3 10100
i3 then upgrade to a 10400F later - or why not straight i5 10400F its faster than a ryzen 5 3600
2x8gb @2666mhz
RYZEN : OK
Both are using stock cooler?
Yes
@n0obhAcker00wkwkwkwk, ampun bang jago
this test need higher gpu
the i3 has 30% faster IPC. no wonder
what cooler you're using for ryzen 2600 ?
Stock cooler
@@Xtremebenchmark thanks dude great video
Thank you so much
Ryzen 2600 has a way better stock cooler right? Whats your opinion about this?
@@Salar-ef9ei yes bro amd coolers are far better than intel..
R5 2600 is better ? What should i buy ?
Whatever's cheaper, including the mobo.
@@thenotsookayguy The i3 10105F is HALF the price of a R5 2600 in Australia. Average price $130 compared to $260. AMD made Intel step up their game BIG time. Having 4 physical cores and including hypethreading for 8, in an i3, is a big change. Another thing AMD had over intel was including a stock cooler, intel took note. It's only good for the consumer.
The only reason to get the AMD over the Intel is if you don't have, nor want to get, a graphics card. The price and performance is just too good.
What's the resulotion
1080p
Ryzen is better than i3 look at 1% low fps. Ryzen win!!
👍
‘Course it wins bro, ryzen 5 2600 is way more expensive than i3 10100f
in some cases, i3 has more fps.
@@leonardoantunes9187 but isnt the motherboard cheaper and the upgrade path better? For the 52600
Lol intel i3 can beat ryzen 5 2600 with turbo boost (same gpu) comparison
на данный момент ебет всех райзен, на алике он стоит 2500гривен +мать 2000грн, хоть интел тоже стоит 2500грн, но мать на него 4000 :D
ofc r5 2600 win
Jajajajaj todos los juegos el i3 y R5 al 50%? Jajaja mentira! Tengo un i5 10600k y no me rinde tanto como un i3 10100f... absoluta mentira!
bruh amd in my country is more expensive the ryzen 5 5600x is twice more expensive than ryzen 5 3600x
They use same socket, if you buy the right motherboard and get a good price on a 3600 you can wait for 5600 to drop and replace the 3600 with it later on
AMD FOREVER!
*Amd always win & better purchase*
I dont think ryzen 5 2600 have 6c 12t 😅
it has bro
It has. I have the cpu
мусорская память 2666, автор рофлит?
RYZEN можно разогнать до 4.2Тогда надо разницу смотреть...
Без нормального охлада ты только хуже сделаешь
@@testingamezу меня дешман башня за косарь) при 4.3 ГГц выше 65 не греется)
Учитывать надо не только башню, но и сам корпус@@kanadathekreator
@@testingamez любой корпус с адекватно продуманной циркуляцией пойдёт), у к слову старый гроб в виде залман, но довольно просторный.
Нет, не пойдет, если плохая обдуваемость@@kanadathekreator
5 3600 buy
This isnt even 10105f lol
Can't read? Even if it was a 10105f, there would be small differences.
+
I3 WIN
memory 2666???dislike
And? A couple fps diference from 3200, no point of high ram speed for gaming.