There is one thing to be considered: it is not possible to make assumption on angular accuracy when measuring in reflectorless mode and doing it automatically, robotic instrument can correct angle in Face I/Face II when it measures reflector - so it can aim directly center of the prism using ATR/Power ATR technology. Now total station measures literally ANY surface, not necessarily the point that is required. Anyway thanks for the video, quite good!!!
yes good points, we never use reflectorless mode for any kind of control work because as you say it is not selective - the only way to get high accuracy is to measure to fixed points with a tripod and prism set up, letting the ATR do its thing, even a prism on a braced pole is subject to movement which affects the overall results. Remember control is very important because if the control points are inaccurate, all subsequent measured points will inherit that inaccuracy before any more measurement takes place. One addition too - ensure the total station is regularly calibrated by experienced engineers they are not foolproof in terms of accuracy, especially if subject to bangs and knocks from time to time
Hi. This method is good for points monitoring purpose especially for reading required redundancies.. Can u show how the data looks like when u export from the equipment?
There is one thing to be considered: it is not possible to make assumption on angular accuracy when measuring in reflectorless mode and doing it automatically, robotic instrument can correct angle in Face I/Face II when it measures reflector - so it can aim directly center of the prism using ATR/Power ATR technology. Now total station measures literally ANY surface, not necessarily the point that is required. Anyway thanks for the video, quite good!!!
Thanks for you advice.
yes good points, we never use reflectorless mode for any kind of control work because as you say it is not selective - the only way to get high accuracy is to measure to fixed points with a tripod and prism set up, letting the ATR do its thing, even a prism on a braced pole is subject to movement which affects the overall results. Remember control is very important because if the control points are inaccurate, all subsequent measured points will inherit that inaccuracy before any more measurement takes place. One addition too - ensure the total station is regularly calibrated by experienced engineers they are not foolproof in terms of accuracy, especially if subject to bangs and knocks from time to time
Thanks for your advice.
This video is only for learning, another original video have my channel about this survey work. Please watch another ok one. Thanks
🙏🙏🙏
Useful video of me bro
Good
Hi. This method is good for points monitoring purpose especially for reading required redundancies.. Can u show how the data looks like when u export from the equipment?
Yes of course, we will make a video about this topic.
Good video ❤
Thanks
Use known back side method
Okay
Leica ts 10 , is it rebotic
Auto calculate but manually need to use.
Bro I need one help degree how to use in leica
Okay
Hi sir there for Auto measurement height Total Station Leica TS16 ?
I think total station can't get auto measurements.
Oh there is not auto height measuring feature on the Leica TS16 I1 "R500" total station right
in my comany they have purchase new Leica TS16 I1 "R500" total station but i didnt know key feature for auto heigh measurement fro instruments.
i thought of take auto heigh measurment for instrument heigh
Depends on what kinds of job you doing.
Apni ki singapura thakan
হ্যা
what does mean ABBA
Check your total station, once you start control survey work you will found it. Thanks
P1 point his this backside point or fore site point
Back side