New Micsig Oscilloscope is a winner! STO1004 Oscilloscope and DP750-100 Differential Probe review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 окт 2024

Комментарии • 140

  • @SaeligCoInc
    @SaeligCoInc 2 года назад +3

    This is one of our best sellers! Thanks!

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  2 года назад

      That’s great! Thanks for your feedback!

  • @URanInTheUglyForest
    @URanInTheUglyForest 2 года назад +7

    I've had a Micsig handheld scope for 7-1/2 years. It doesn't get heavy usage, but I can count on it when I need it. It was a great alternative to the big brands at the time. Just like the scope in the video, it packs a lot of features for the price. Their customer support has been fast to reply when I've had questions. The PC interface software has been my only gripe. Otherwise, I've been pleased overall.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  2 года назад +2

      Thanks for the great feedback!

  • @johnwright8814
    @johnwright8814 2 года назад +5

    When I was watching this, I was repeating to myself "I don't need another 'scope".
    Even if it would be a useful addition to my bench.

  • @peterwu831
    @peterwu831 2 года назад +7

    A cool scope, and it’s battery powered so you won’t have “ground differential” problem easily. Wish it had a built in function generator and Bode plot capability.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  2 года назад

      Thanks Peter - I agree with you!

    • @pocoapoco2
      @pocoapoco2 Год назад +1

      Yeah, if it had an arb gen I'd definitely get one.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      I wish it did so it could do Bode Plots simply. But it is a great scope.

  • @lupo631
    @lupo631 10 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you very much. Your explanations helped me a lot. Today I ordered a Migsic TO 2004. I run a little workshop for motorcycles, old ones. I do not need big bandwith. The problems I have to solve mostly are single events of the motorcycle electic that cause a failure and occur sporadicly. For that I need a big deep memory. The enviroment in my workshop is both dirty and rough: oil, dirt and dirty hands, not like a workbench in a lab. For that enviroment the Micsig looks perfect and easy to clean.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks for this real world experience and use case! I agree - Micsig is a winner for that application;)

    • @lupo631
      @lupo631 10 месяцев назад +1

      Hey, what a surpirse: Today I found your video as a reference in a commercial video of Micsig on youtube. Congratulation! Thats a great compliment of the quality of your work from Migsig! @@KissAnalog

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      Thank you for letting me know. That is fantastic! I really like every Micsig product that I have. They are kicking but, and the new stuff coming out is really amazing.

  • @versace885
    @versace885 2 года назад +3

    Hi Eddie, I really enjoyed your review it was thorough. Thanks for these videos, very informative. Thanks a bunch.😃

  • @andymouse
    @andymouse 2 года назад +6

    Nice review ! but nothing they can do can change the fact that a serious scope has rotary encoders (or Pot's) that you can turn and click ! They can keep their daft Joysticks !...cheers.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад +2

      Thanks for your feedback! I appreciate you! I thought the joysticks were an interesting move - but now that I've used them I can see how nice they are. I noticed that our mechanical engineers now use more of a joystick type of mouse instead of the ball type. I asked what the deal was and they said it was the new 'greatest thing' ;) but it took a little time to get used to. I think as technology moves forward - the confident manufactures will lead by changing and not being afraid. Maybe Micsig is starting the new trend? I remember when encoders were thought of as a digital comic replacement to the awesomeness of the analog bourns sealed pots;)

    • @andymouse
      @andymouse Год назад +1

      @@KissAnalog Perhaps I was a bit 'Grumpy Old Man' there but I cant see it catching on ! I'll take a slice of humble pie when I see Keysight and the like using them on £30,000 scope...cheers !

    • @tohaason
      @tohaason Год назад +2

      A bit worried about having to use a joystick. I'm not good at precision movements with my fingers. I can't use trackballs, and I hate touchpads. I absolutely can't use the IBM Thinkpad-style "joystick" alternative, which is what those joysticks on the Micsig look like. I can use a computer mouse and in particular the scroll wheel. Never felt like wanting to play games involving joysticks. I like the rotary encoders on the instruments I currently use. They're old and big though.. something new would be nice, particularly when I move to my retirement country and I can't bring my old scopes .. I want rotary encoders..
      Edit: Looking closer at the video.. a) it looks like the way the joysticks are working is that you push and hold and release at the exact right time when e.g. the sweep is at the right place.. that's exactly what I'm not good at with joysticks: Timing. But b) it also looks like you can use the touch screen instead, for that particular function.. and that I can do, if I understood what I saw correctly.
      Edit2: That touch screen interface looks really good. Much better than on some of the other scopes I've watched reviews of recently.
      Edit3: Having looked around a bit more.. it's super frustrating that Micsig has improved the casing etc. on the new one, compared to the STO1104C/E series, but at the same time downgraded the UI so much with those awful joysticks. That's essentially what's preventing me from buying one. Micsig seems to have discontinued the 4-channel STO1104C and E models, they only list the 2-channel ones, but you can still buy them here and there. But then they have the older physical features (case, bnc) which would be a downgrade from the STO1004.. why couldn't they have made a model which kept the physical UI but was otherwise like that STO1004?
      As it is, I can't get myself to buy that joystick thing.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      You bring up some great points. The smaller controls are not for everyone. But the touch screen is easy to use and does everything - I'm pretty sure;) They are coming out with new pads that have no controls which might be up your ally if you are OK with touch pads. They also have a new series of scopes coming out that I really want;) I think we are maybe a month away. I hope I can get one soon.

  • @ThunderbirdRocket
    @ThunderbirdRocket Год назад +2

    Super helpful ! Extraordinary detail !! I learned lots of new things !!! Thanks mate !!!!

  • @qzorn4440
    @qzorn4440 2 года назад +2

    wow I cannot get enough of these neat test equipment videos for the hobbyist and working on VFD inverter 440vac 3-phase AC or 150-Hp DC drives. The electronic repair world is changing.
    Troubleshooting and decoding Modbus rtu rs485 IIOT as well as the farmers are asking who can fix their John Deere tractors and huge combines for a fair price? Mmm. 😎 thanks a lot.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  2 года назад +1

      Thanks for the great feedback!

  • @jodyhoward2899
    @jodyhoward2899 9 месяцев назад +1

    Great Job, just bought one and you answered most of my questions…
    Thanks
    Jody

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  9 месяцев назад

      Glad to help! Let us know how you like it;)

  • @waltercheatle1794
    @waltercheatle1794 2 года назад +7

    Great review and quite thorough. If only there was an MDO scope at an equivalent price. I really like your GwInstek scope because of it's spectrum analyzer feature.

    • @testboga5991
      @testboga5991 2 года назад +2

      Yeah, the GWinstek MDO would be so cool if only cheaper. I don't see why they don't lower the price. It's not fundamentally different from regular scopes. The SA is still just software, not hardware like in the expensive Tek MDOs.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад +1

      Thanks for your feedback. I agree with @Test Boga though - the spectrum is only slightly better than the FFT. The FFT on the Micsig is far easier to use than say the Siglent. The spectrum feature and Bode Plot as well as the AWG is great on the GW, but at almost 3x the price - it is a bit high. GW will not work with me - even though many have bought their scope based on this channel. They are old school and work with distributors, so when I bought mine - even though I am so close to California, they had to ship it to the midwest to the distributor and then sent back to me. So shipping was more expensive and the time to get it was twice as long. They think their scope is worth more because it is made in Taiwan. Give me a break!

    • @Bond4080
      @Bond4080 Год назад +1

      @@KissAnalog Way superior than the Chinese built ones. Top notch components and quality control. Never had any problems with them.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      I think the Micsig is built just as well as my GW Instek. Micsig is one of those top notch companies. The are really pushing the tech - and their new stuff is really awesome.

  • @alexanderorozco661
    @alexanderorozco661 6 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you for taking the time to guides

  • @TelonicInstruments-rn9tz
    @TelonicInstruments-rn9tz Год назад +1

    Great review, this scope is being very well received by our customers in the U.K also we have Just had our latest shipment, so now in stock..

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      That's great to hear! Thank you! Love this scope - but would love to review the current probes for it;)

  • @swaneeway
    @swaneeway Год назад +1

    Thank you for watching the video.
    in Seoul

  • @notimporta3416
    @notimporta3416 Год назад +2

    How about a review on the hantek TO1000 series ? .love your altruistic work

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks so much! I'm trying to get another scope to review. They have a new one coming out that looks amazing!

  • @alexanderorozco661
    @alexanderorozco661 Месяц назад +1

    Thank you for the tutorial. Excellent 🥋

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Месяц назад +1

      Glad it was helpful! I appreciate you!

  • @friedmule5403
    @friedmule5403 2 года назад +3

    What a great review, it was fluent without any "what now to say" and you were great at going through the interesting functions. :-)
    I did only notes a minor thing and that was the reflection of the camera in the screen, maybe a circular polarization filter could remove that?
    I have to admit I like the user interface on the old model better, it has easy to see colors and a turn button compared to the "joystick".
    You talked about normally using 10X probes, but I thought that 1X would be much more useful when testing ripples and noise in, i.e. power supplies? :-)

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  2 года назад +1

      Thanks! I appreciate your great feedback!

  • @Kicker700
    @Kicker700 2 года назад +2

    Got to sit down and watch. I need a new scope

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  2 года назад

      Thanks! This might be the one;)

  • @notquitecopacetic
    @notquitecopacetic 2 года назад +3

    Ten minutes in. Coolest scope I have seen. Great video, well done! If my kids did not have to eat this would be my first scope :)

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  2 года назад

      LOL thank you!

    • @chantalheen484
      @chantalheen484 Год назад +1

      If you can afford less than 125$ shipped(ebay) the dso2512G is the best handheld 2 channel scope for that amount of money currently avail. check it out, I actually own two and at that price point I would say its the best handheld scope

    • @notquitecopacetic
      @notquitecopacetic Год назад +1

      @@chantalheen484 I will probably learn with something like that eventually...that is to say when I get caught up on all my other useless projects. Thanks for the recommendation!

  • @JDW-
    @JDW- Год назад +1

    @Kiss Analog
    Don't you prefer the nice big knobs of the STO1104C (you did a review on that) better than the tiny blue buttons of the STO1004? Seems like the STO1104C knobs are better suited to people who like traditional scopes but who also want portability. Thoughts?

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад +1

      Great questions! I do like both scopes, but I like the new version in that the case is upgraded and feels more durable, but on the bench both are fine. I like the new input connections for their specialized probes which are lower cost than these probes that come with the universal bnc input. Usually specialized probes with special inputs are more expensive. I think you can't go wrong either way. I'd have to put them side by side again now that I've had time with both. I do need to do more videos showing the Micsig probes and scopes.

  • @fredflickinger643
    @fredflickinger643 2 года назад +2

    Great review of a very effective tablet scope!

  • @tonyfremont
    @tonyfremont 2 года назад +2

    I've been watching the micsig scopes for a couple of years and they're really making a name for themselves. The build quality is way above most portable scopes, and they have bigger scope performance. Alas, I got a Rigol 5000 earlier this year, when I was afraid they might become unavailable. Of course they lowered the price by $200 shortly after I bought one. If I had need for battery operated portability, I'd definitely buy a micsig. There just aren't any better tablet type scopes.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  2 года назад +1

      Thanks for your feedback! Micsig scopes do seem to be really well made and designed.

    • @jstro-hobbytech
      @jstro-hobbytech 2 года назад +1

      You're right. The only sub 1k one I can think of is finrisi.....

    • @tonyfremont
      @tonyfremont 2 года назад

      @@jstro-hobbytech I've actually got one of those "table" type scopes. It's cute and actually generally usable, but it's a far cry from "real" scopes. It's major weakness, to me, is not having input inversion.

    • @jstro-hobbytech
      @jstro-hobbytech 2 года назад +1

      @@tonyfremont the rigol 5000 series scopes are incredible. With touch screens and 8gsa, logic analyzer

  • @john_hind
    @john_hind Год назад +2

    Very nice! Not entirely convinced the joysticks are an improvement on the rotary encoders of the old model though. Something that has always puzzled me about 'scopes: why do they not have differential inputs built in? Would be safer and more flexible and should only increase the cost marginally since all the packaging and power supply arrangements for the external active probe would be unnecessary.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Yes the joysticks are something new and as all new things have to be proven out. That's a great question about the diff inputs. It is actually not trivial and takes some extra circuitry that complexes things considerably when also keeping noise low. The Picoscope does an amazing job and provides and unbelievable 4 channels. See this video: ruclips.net/video/vFRvdYTCkx4/видео.html

  • @howlinhog
    @howlinhog Год назад +2

    I had the previous version and sold it. I'm left-handed and would constantly pick it up with my right hand grabbing the end with the control knobs. More than a few times I found myself accidentally changing settings by hitting the control knobs. I see there are less knobs and maybe even shorter and more inboard. Do you think the changes would help alleviate some of my self-imposed issues? I know it probably sounds odd for somebody who works off of a bench, but I'm a mobile tech. The rubberized protective layer sounds like a huge improvement for me personally.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks for the great question!! I've actually been on top of a military ship (far off the ground) and really appreciate a scope that is easy to use;) I agree - this rubberized body is a nice improvement. I think the new controls take a minute to get used to, but they are simpler once you get the hang of it and one knob does multiple functions so there's less searching for the right knob.

  • @Dyaxxis
    @Dyaxxis 2 года назад +1

    14:03 That's what I've experienced with the contractors' labs I worked in off and on for the past 25 years. I've even seen where there was an "enclosed high speed video camera" system mounted in front some of the high bandwidth analog o'scope screens in an attempt to capture possible events, then sure enough... the analog setups were quickly replaced once the digital scopes with deep memory and high speed capture came on the market (that is of course once the new systems were validated).

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks for this great feedback!

  • @zekzygaming5128
    @zekzygaming5128 Год назад +1

    Does this scope have common grounds between the channels or do they have individual floating grounds?

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Great question. They are common grounds. But it is not tired to mains:)

  • @mohamedsaady4557
    @mohamedsaady4557 Год назад +1

    Thanks for All

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      You Bet! And thanks so much!

  • @lensherman6242
    @lensherman6242 2 года назад +1

    I'd like to see a review of the new Micsig current probes with tiny heads similar to Tek. I can't find a link right now, but I know I have seen them online somewhere.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks for asking! I want to test them too. I think I'll get one when they come out - which I think is later this month.

  • @jstro-hobbytech
    @jstro-hobbytech 2 года назад +2

    Are you going to do your civic duty??? Haha awesome video and if I had my time over I would've bought a micsig

  • @jessemackenzie6516
    @jessemackenzie6516 Год назад +1

    under display and common there is HorREF. Can you tell me what that difference between the 2 choices ( center and Trigger) i see no difference on my scope when I change it

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks for asking. When you push the button to center the trace - it will either center in the screen - or center around the trigger.

  • @always_broke_LOL
    @always_broke_LOL Год назад +2

    Do you now prefer this scope over the GW Instek MDO

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      Great question! Yes - in general it is easy to use and fun. I do use the GW for bode plots though.

  • @testboga5991
    @testboga5991 2 года назад +1

    I got the scope and it's really great! However, it still has several software bugs and clumsy usability in some respects (channel time shifting) etc. When it arrived, it couldn't display an accurate signal. It was doing some weird aliasing. Only pressing "Auto" once fixed that, though - and it never reoccurred.
    A huge issue is also reaching the decoding channels and their menu. That's really cumbersome and the performance I've seen so far wasn't great, either. Lots of false decoding on I2C.
    FFT is also atrocious. Why the hell can't they just provide a menu to set the values. Adjusting it with the knobs is horrible.
    But apart from these quirks, which in similar form also occur on other cheaper scopes, it has performed fairly well so far. Especially heaving a floating device without mandatory ground is great already!

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks for the great feedback! Have you updated to the latest firmware? I haven't noticed any problem yet, but then I haven't tried the I2C decode yet.

  • @cpcfreak
    @cpcfreak 2 года назад +1

    It would be great if they give you to review the TO2004 or TO3004 to compare, and some of the new current probes to round out the offering. For myself I think the TO2004 specs are about correct, but I'm not so keen on the full touchscreen only interface. I think I would prefer the STO format with buttons, specially when working away from the bench on automotive or smarthome type projects, I know in the field in SE Asia humidity and dust play havoc with touchscreens. But 100MHz is not enough, 200Mhz seems to be the sweet spot and would make the Micsig ultra-competitive with devices like PicoScope or Cleverscope. At the moment many workshops have to share devices because of the cost, Micsig pricing we might see that change. The only thing missing from these scopes for a more complete field utility would be an AWG.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад +1

      Thanks Justin for your feedback! I agree - I like the physical controls so you have the option of touch screen or manual controls. I do like the touch screen though - which surprises me;) I love the Picoscope as well;)

    • @cpcfreak
      @cpcfreak Год назад +1

      @@KissAnalog Agreed, but the Picoscope and the Cleverscope are in a different price bracket and have no built in display, so you always have to add a laptop to keep them portable. It sounds like the Micsig touchscreen is pretty good, and responsive. I've found many touchscreen diagnostic tools to be a bit laggy on the touch interface, I suppose they have to balance size, cost and responsiveness, but a slow interface can be very frustrating. Sometimes when using a scope it's already stressful when trying to find a bug or intermittent fault, that last thing you need is the distraction from the diagnostic device, but watching your video the Micsig looks pretty quick.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      Yes the Micsig seems to be very quick and responsive. I have fun using it so I use it most often.

  • @tohaason
    @tohaason Год назад +1

    Aren't those Auto (as in "car") diagnostics a feature only found in the SATO1004, and not in the STO1004? At least according to their website. Edit: In the video we see the headline "SATO 1000x series", so yes. It's not in the STO 1000x series.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks for pointing that out. The automotive version does come with some specific features. Although some of the probes will work on any scope.

  • @MrBoomtheroom
    @MrBoomtheroom Год назад +1

    how are oscilloscopes used to find out what is causing amplifier noise bleeding from transformers through to speakers

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks for asking! Using FFT would be one way:)

  • @electronic7979
    @electronic7979 2 года назад +3

    Nice review video

  • @TheRcEngineer
    @TheRcEngineer Год назад +1

    I want to buy one but i simply cant decide knobs or bigger screen without knobs

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks - that is a great question and I think it depends on how you use it. I think either one you would get used to - either not having knobs - or not having as big a screen;) The 10" screen is huge so I can see why you would want it. Here's the link: amzn.to/3Sz5K3u

  • @jony-baroi
    @jony-baroi Год назад +1

    As an electronics enthusiast I wish I had a digital scope..!🥰😔

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks - they are really great to use. I will be giving one away at Christmas, so you never know;)

    • @jony-baroi
      @jony-baroi Год назад +1

      @@KissAnalog then I'm ready to not miss it!.. thanks❤️

  • @sleepyduck
    @sleepyduck 2 года назад +1

    can you do a short video on how can we can properly use Eg deep memory in some applications?

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад +1

      Thanks for asking! Here's one that I did, but let me know if I should do another;) ruclips.net/video/cZijqSDTLJw/видео.html

  • @springmint3810
    @springmint3810 2 года назад +1

    KA has a FLIR DMM in his comments. I had a nice FLIR clamp-on with Bluetooth, 6AAA batteries, and a leaky battery ruined it CM55??). Then I got the non-Bluetooth version off of fleabay, put Panasonic Eneloop re-chargeable batteries in it, and no dice, not enough voltage, the meter thinks the batteries are no good and shuts down.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  2 года назад

      Thanks for your feedback! Great information! I think FLIR sells a rechargeable battery;)

  • @amins9240
    @amins9240 Год назад +1

    I have Voltcraft Dscope 707,
    I don,t found any data of Scope ,
    I need bandwidh of freq of Scope.
    You help me

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks for the question. It is a 100 MHz scope and it is pretty awesome I think. Here's the link: amzn.to/3o2ZTcg

    • @amins9240
      @amins9240 Год назад +1

      @@KissAnalog I think 100khz? You certainly100mhz

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      This one is 100MHz and a great scope at a great price: amzn.to/47fIEEV

  • @bobdoritique7347
    @bobdoritique7347 2 года назад +1

    Merci for this video.😊

  • @wrlightssounds3579
    @wrlightssounds3579 Год назад +1

    i wander what scope did they use to make this scope. 😅

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks for your feedback. Today Chinese companies like Micsig are kicking our buts. Sad but true. You use a country for so many decades to build your stuff - they learn and end up doing it better. China is the new Japan. Japan tech today is top notch.

  • @pa3eka
    @pa3eka 2 года назад +2

    it is actually not a comparison of the GW instek 2072EG or the migstig sto1004 , the mig stig scope is a bit better but you are undoubtedly missing the spectrum analyzer and the 25 mhz built-in function generator the Bode Plot possibility I would think about it for a while before you do the gw gets rid of or banishes to your storage 🤔

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks Bert! I do like the Bode plot function with built in ARB generator of the GW, but then it does cost about 3x more than the Micsig ;) Actually the spectrum analyzer function is only a bit better than the FFT of the Micsig.

    • @pa3eka
      @pa3eka Год назад +1

      @@KissAnalog You know I have the 2 channel 70mhz Its a lot cheaper than the 4 channel 200mhz with also the 2 function generators That is included spectrum analyzer But only 2 times expensive 😀 And very happy with it Specialy that there is no Computer needed Best 73s Bert pa3eka

  • @wesleysf16
    @wesleysf16 9 месяцев назад +1

    Hantek TO1254D is bad?

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  9 месяцев назад

      Thanks for the heads up. What is bad about it? I wasn't impressed with the specs at the price, and I think Micsig is so much better on paper and I love the way they work. This one is a lot less expensive than the Hantek: amzn.to/3Sbfl26

  • @deviantmultimedia9497
    @deviantmultimedia9497 Год назад +1

    Well done, sir. You have a lot of cool scopes. Can I have one?

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      LOL thanks for your feedback! I think I might have one or two to give away - when I make 100k subs;) But I also think I'll sell my Micsig that I just replaced;)

  • @globalteamwork4light
    @globalteamwork4light Год назад +1

    thanks for a nice review.
    as to best in class?
    micsig 8 bit resolution, owon 14 bit resolution.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thank you! Yes the Owon is a great contender. It also has the battery option, but It might be in a little higher price range with the battery and 14 bit resolution options. The firmware is not as polished as the Micsig either.
      I do like the Owon and the fantastic 14 bits!!! Here's a link to my video on it: ruclips.net/video/_bYCnCIAVKI/видео.html

    • @globalteamwork4light
      @globalteamwork4light Год назад +1

      @@KissAnalog
      thanx.
      will see the video mentioned👍

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      thanks

  • @jimmyzhao2673
    @jimmyzhao2673 2 года назад +2

    Could someone in the comments section recommend a scope for working with Arduino and small projects ?

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад +1

      Great question! I think this Micsig would be excellent! But at a lower cost, check this video out: ruclips.net/video/_aDB1rjzGiM/видео.html

  • @jstro-hobbytech
    @jstro-hobbytech 2 года назад +1

    I want to buy some better probes but I don't even know where to start because of the wildly varying prices.

    • @andymouse
      @andymouse 2 года назад +2

      What's wrong with the ones you have ? establishing this would help enormously.

    • @jstro-hobbytech
      @jstro-hobbytech 2 года назад +2

      @@andymousedifferent types rather like current probes, differential, better quality ones. I have a keysight probe that is much better than my old tektronix ones or my siglent ones. There's more fittings for the end. Is that satisfactory my friend. Haha Thanks for that correction as I am a bone head most times

    • @jstro-hobbytech
      @jstro-hobbytech 2 года назад +2

      @@andymouse if you've read my comments before I'm sure you've noticed there is something off with me. You'd be right in that assumption.

    • @andymouse
      @andymouse 2 года назад +2

      @@jstro-hobbytech Lol !

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад +2

      Joey - you must be looking into the future! I bought several brands of probes to review. I just need to find the time to do the video;)

  • @petrikko
    @petrikko 6 месяцев назад +1

    Hello. Great channel and a lot of information. Thanks on behalf of all subscribers.
    A question and a request, could you take a look and review the TAO3102 Oscilloscope?
    I will be grateful :-)
    Regards

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks so much! I appreciate you! I'll see if I can get one;)

  • @RokKovacic70
    @RokKovacic70 Год назад +1

    Just looking at the background of your videos, makes it clear you never actually use any of these gear for real life work.
    So, yes bad vibes, and alot of clout...

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад +2

      Well it sounds like you haven't seen many of my videos or you would know how wrong you are. Of course I don't use this on my day job as I use scopes that cost $20k or more, but that's only because they spend more than they need to and have the budget.
      When I worked for the start-up, I actually took my equipment to the lab as it was for superior to what they had purchased.
      This review is meant to show how awesome this scope is and what you can get for reasonable costs - not what defense contractors spend for their over inflated budgets.
      Sorry that the review wasn't good enough for you to see this value.

  • @stevenbliss989
    @stevenbliss989 2 года назад +2

    NIce scope, and the DEEP memory is great! Love the battery use, but not a fan of touch screens. The Rigol has DEEP memory, but it can bit a bit tedious to use.

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Год назад

      Thanks Steven! I wasn't a fan of touch screen when I was using the tek at work (a scope that cost around $25k), but the Micsig seems to have won me over;)

  • @pbl57lsu
    @pbl57lsu Месяц назад +1

    ive been looking hard at the sato1004 and this model. the only differences i can find are the bandwidth filters and i assume the sato has the same software with additions for automotive testing?

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Месяц назад +1

      These are really nice scopes. I'm going to sell my model that I bought before this one: ruclips.net/video/NtEt8Zc8oVA/видео.html

    • @pbl57lsu
      @pbl57lsu Месяц назад +1

      My only issue with these is the cat ratings. Diff. Probes and attentuators increases the price anyway. They are impressive scopes

    • @KissAnalog
      @KissAnalog  Месяц назад

      Most scopes have the same CAT II rating. The probes make the difference.

    • @pbl57lsu
      @pbl57lsu Месяц назад

      @@KissAnalog I do like the scope, its very buggy with saving features and wifi will not work, so remote use without hardwiring is a no go. It really needs software support updates