How to Study Recent & Landmark Case Laws for CLAT PG 2025/26 [Tips and Techniques] - CLAT POINT PG

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
  • How to Study Recent & Landmark Case Laws for CLAT PG 2025/26 - CLAT POINT PG
    All Our Online Courses: play.google.co...
    or visit www.clatpoint....
    for IOS: apps.apple.com... (CODE: qttja)
    Join telegram: telegram.me/cl...
    • 📞 7011249333
    • 📧 support@clatpoint.com
    For the CLAT PG (Common Law Admission Test for Postgraduate Programs), knowledge of significant case laws is crucial. Here’s a summary of key cases across various subjects, which are often tested:
    1. Constitutional Law
    Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): Established the Basic Structure Doctrine.
    Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980): Reaffirmed the Basic Structure Doctrine and clarified the balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
    Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978): Expanded the interpretation of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).
    S. R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994): Laid down the principles for the application of President's Rule in states.
    Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018): Decriminalized consensual homosexual acts between adults.
    2. Administrative Law
    A. K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969): Distinguished between administrative and quasi-judicial functions.
    Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978): Introduced the concept of "due process of law".
    Golak Nath v. State of Punjab (1967): Asserted that Fundamental Rights cannot be abridged or taken away by constitutional amendments.
    3. Law of Contracts
    Hadley v. Baxendale (1854): Established the principle of consequential damages.
    Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893): Defined the principle of unilateral contracts and the concept of acceptance.
    Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd. (1915): Established the doctrine of privity of contract.
    4. Law of Torts
    Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932): Introduced the concept of duty of care and established the modern law of negligence.
    Rylands v. Fletcher (1868): Established the rule of strict liability for the escape of dangerous substances.
    Ashby v. White (1703): Asserted that where there is a right, there is a remedy (ubi jus ibi remedium).
    5. Criminal Law
    R. v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): Established the principle that necessity is not a defense to a charge of murder.
    K. M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1962): Discussed the defense of provocation.
    State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Sitaram Bhosale (2008): Deliberated on the concept of criminal conspiracy.
    6. Family Law
    Shah Bano Begum v. Mohd. Ahmed Khan (1985): Addressed the issue of maintenance rights of a Muslim woman after divorce.
    Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): Laid down guidelines to deal with sexual harassment at the workplace.
    Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017): Declared Triple Talaq as unconstitutional.
    7. Property Law
    Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903): Held that a minor’s contract is void ab initio.
    T. V. Channellor v. Ramaswami (1939): Discussed the doctrine of part performance under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
    8. Public International Law
    Trail Smelter Arbitration (1941): Established the principle that a state is liable for transboundary pollution that causes damage in another state.
    Corfu Channel Case (1949): Established that states must not knowingly allow their territory to be used for acts contrary to the rights of other states.
    9. Human Rights
    Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): Established guidelines to address sexual harassment.
    Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985): Recognized the right to livelihood as a part of the right to life.
    10. Environmental Law
    M. C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987): Addressed issues of environmental degradation and the concept of absolute liability for hazardous industries.
    Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996): Introduced the concept of sustainable development and the Precautionary Principle.
    These cases cover a broad spectrum of legal principles and doctrines, making them essential for CLAT PG aspirants. Reading and understanding these cases will help you grasp fundamental legal concepts and improve your ability to analyze legal issues effectively.
    case laws for clat pg 2025,important case laws for clat pg 2025,how to prepare for clat pg 2026,recent case law forclat pg,case laws for clat llm 2025,clat pg 2025,clat pg 2025 preparation,clat pg prepration,case law for clat pg 2026,clat pg 2025 important case law,important cases for clat pg 2025 exam,case laws for clat pg 2025,recent case law for clat pg 2025,clat pg case laws,how to prepare case law for clat pg 2025,how to prepare case law for clat pg,clat pg2025 case laws study tips,case laws for clat pg 2025

Комментарии •