I do consider, some, last of us or horizon, type catastrophe. And hundreds or thousands of years later how they would try to make sense of our civilizations. We have the whole context because we live in it. But if it was all crumbled and you had no idea, it's hard to imagine what it would look like to someone then.
Or, the boat you're in takes a nice drift past the torch of the Statue of Liberty. Maybe tie up to the thing and take some pictures. Show the tops of the buildings that used to be Manhattan's skyline. :)
@@amandarios448 I lived in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for awhile in the 1980's. We worked there at the time and often went to the desert. I know what you mean, it can be blazing hot but the evenings are so nice and so beautiful. Looking up at the stars alone is just breathtaking. I miss it too sometimes.
@@Janepint I live in a coastal area, you can Google "lençóis maranhenses" or "Delta Parnaíba" Brazil has a natural delta, where it's otherwise a desert and sand beaches. There's a big Delta, and in the rainy season pools form between the dunes and form clear lakes. Just the dunes or anywhere at the beach you can watch the sunset glow in ligh pink to deep purple, and the sky is the deepest blue, and when you go far from the city the shine of the stars is amazing and on a full moon the white sand almost looks glowing. It's really breath taking, I went there many times to watch the sky and not gonna lie it's a nice relief when the temperature drops at night.
@@amandarios448 Oh my! This is a very different desert than I experiences. I can't believe how beautiful the sand and sea is in Brazil. Maybe one day I can experience that too. Looks Hot! I only do evening and night time. LOL Amanda Take care!
I want to know what is under the sand at the south entrance. A single ship is all it would take to really change everything. I have no doubt the Sahara has an entire history beneath it.
Yes, that would be intensely cool. The trouble with finding a ship, or anything else, is the time frame. They just found a whole civilization buried under the Sahara (the Garamantian), but it's less than 2000 years old and the walls are now just a few feet high. A city at Richat would be 11,000 years old, yes? Even Plato said that nothing is left there, after repeated floods and washing away of all soft soil, etc. Even old foundational wall fragments might not have survived such a span of time. www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/11/111111-sahara-libya-lost-civilization-science-satellites/
Frank Castle Africa is a ginormous continent which has been home to a great multitude of peoples, Civilizations, etc throughout the many millennia - I’ve only ever heard ignorant racists here in the west use that saying when referring to sub-Saharan Africans, as if those were the only people to ever call Africa home.
I'm 54 years old. It would be one of the greatest discoveries in history if it could be proved, and I hope it can happen in my lifetime. You sir, are truly an inspiration, for your courage in traveling to such a dangerous location to get to the truth.
Unlikely. Plato was making a allegory. To the extent that he talks about "Ancient Athens" At the same time... A time at which Athens didn't exist, and the government he describes sure as hell didn't. He also goes on at length about the Atlantis Counqcouring most of the Mediterranean, at a time when we have records of... nothing like that happening.
something that caught my eye buddy......the sheer amount of small stones on the rings vs the amount of stones outside of the structure...….almost seems like those ARE the rubble from a city scattered across the rings
How amazing would that be if you did find some small tidbits on the rocks..... I'm pretty much sold on the idea this is atlantis.. The Plato and Herodotus map thing is kinda the icing on the cake. So to find a piece of atlantis with writing on it.....would be something you could never forget. Hell one one the most surreal experiences I've ever had was climbing the step pyramids in the Rivera....this blows that out of the water
While thats true this place was washed away not buried over time. Doesn’t mean an excavation wont turn anything up but most if any evidence is left itd be somewhere in the Atlantic ocean.
There wouldn’t be anything there anyways, if the flood is true, then it would’ve wiped everything out all the way down to the bedrock, so anything that was sitting on the top soil would’ve been crushed into a million pieces.
@@rocksjoshua Not so sure. There is evidence of explosions in several pyramids in Egypt including the Great pyramid. It makes sense that a sea water flood would cause such an explosion in a resonant structure. It is easily possible those pyramids were flooded some 12k yrs ago and stopped working. This flood was probably a result of an asteroid impact and it was not as disastrous as the previous flood described by Summerians and the Bible some 60k yrs ago. It all makes quite sense. Different cause of the flood, different results. The first flood is described by Summerians as a result of planetary collision (close encounter), the second flood is recognized by the modern scholars as an asteroid impact. It´s simply possible...
You realize that there is salt, you also see where there where rivers in the mountains, and can see remnants of water erosion over the land. The water currents would have been way to strong and would have ripped the bedrock away.
It’s crazy how much “rubble” is on the ground. It looks like a demolition sight where the only thing left are broken up pieces of concrete foundation are littered everywhere.
My thoughts exactly.....he said they were NOT megalithic builders....as he walks through an obliterated debri feild of small rubble, that once was huge megaliths, before the destruction.....he's literally walking on the evidence.....get a shovel and dig.......he doesnt look like hes into doing the work, but only walk around to see whats on top, in plain veiw....he has no idea what lies beneath his feet.....nor dont I think he researched much prior, as he went during the hottest time of year...120°, lol
@@johnappleby2182 First, that place is huge. Miles in diameter. There's a reason excavation takes so long, is so expensive, and requires so much manpower. Try going out there with a single shovel and see how far you get before collapsing. Second, it's just illegal.
@@calebalwayswill7423 , i only wish i could , but your absolutely right..... If just anybody could walk in there and start digging I'm sure they would have long before now and all the ously some have as stone relics have been found and some very interesting granite pieces, I might add... Im literally envious, as well as grateful, that he simply made the hands on journey to this amazing site and the priveledge to be guided safely and ogle the site , itself, is miraculous, in my oppinion...i only wish i could, lol.... My sincerest appologies, if my first comment seemed negative or offensive , in any way, as this was not my intent to criticize , ridicule or mock, these fantastic efforts......I only wish I could...
We have to remember that Plato was far removed in time from the supposed time of Atlantis. To put that into perspective ancient Egypt and modern day civilization are closer in time than Plato was to the time Atlantis was said to have existed. Much respect for going out there and investigating this for yourself.
Yeah, and that his description of Atlantis and its demise perfectly fits with the very recent discoveries of massive impact craters from exactly that time period. Amazing.
We should also remember that in Plato's story he talkes about "Ancient Athens" being around at the same time... When no one lived in the area of Athens at the time. And there sure as hell was no major city. Plato was making a alagory.
@@captainseyepatch3879 aswell as the atlantis info is not necessarily his story but just information that has been passed down from generation to generation... Critias was Plato's great grandfather who heard the story from Dropides, (his grandfather) who in turn heard the story from Solon and solon heard it from Egyptians. Its like his great great grandfather head about it from a friend who heard it from a Egyptian friend.
I like how you give supporting evidence without overbearing bias or opinion and let people decide for themselves. It really is a compelling argument, world history is an amazing thing and I don’t think that our current knowledge comes close to a complete picture of ancient civilizations. A lot of times it’s unpopular to postulate these things because “we’re smart so we know everything that’s happened” while denying any other arguments as pseudoscience. Great job and courage to follow your passion and do this!
It is not "supporting evidence." There is no dating nor provenance for the artifacts shown. It is not a compelling argument unless you don't understand the definition of "argument" and "compelling." It is a made-up fantasy. It's as real as Valhalla and Heaven and Hades.
First Last It’s in Northern Turkey which was at the time inhabited by Greeks and was thought to be a Greek kingdom or city state much like Sparta and Athens
A drone would have been important. A video review of variations in rocks found in the area. ... and why video yourself the whole time??? I mean, you went all the way there and we're stuck looking at your face. Seriously, you goon?
If you are looking for artifacts you need to understand the flow pattern of the flood water the first smash in toward the Sahara and then the slower outflow back to the sea. The mud area is highly likely to contain what you are looking for.
I’ve watched two videos of people going to the richat structure so far after seeing @brightinsight ‘s video on the theory of it being Atlantis. The biggest contributing factor to the lack of archeological evidence is that Atlantis was supposed to have been buried by the “sea”(the ocean in reality)...likely, with the force of the ocean, everything would be under the earth at this point, as flood don’t just bring water, they bring massive amounts of sand/mud/rocks/whatever else, And definitely, debris would be pulled to the south west due to the receding of the waters. Either way, it will be very difficult to find anything on the surface. And since the government has made it illegal to utilize any kind of sonar mapping or other technologies to see what’s under the ground, it is likely going to be awhile before any new evidence is found. That being said, it isn’t right to deny the possibility of this being the location, as I saw in the other video, and it’s not right to stop looking! I would like to point out that the reason given in the other video for this is that the government doesn’t want any gold to be taken from their land and doesn’t want any kind of damage to be done to the area. I think if the right people with the right interpreters spoke with some of the higher up government officials, in a safe manner of course, showing the abscence of greed for profit to be made, and sharing their desire to respect the land, an agreement could be reached. I would like to look more into the government in that area.🙏🏼🙏🏼
Yeah but what we see from satellite imagery is due to wind errosion, not some massive flood plain. Any flood that would have occurred there would have had its evidence long since buried. If you wanted to really argue the point that would require taking soil samples and comparing them to samples taken from the coast lines on either end of the supposed flood plain.
What about the stuffs that are too heavy to be pulled back to the sea ? The force of pushing is stroger than pulling, the same way of the flood, thats why stuffs are destroyed by floods even if its sturdy buildings but when its receding the heavy stuffs remains on the ground, same thing in aceh, indonesia.
Mark Smith fuck the government. Why let that stop you? No one is going to go up to you. People need to remember that we run our lives not the governments. The fact that the word government literally meant to govern your mind in Latin should wake you the fuck up. The government doesn’t this the government doesn’t that. Man fuck them. They take all your govt money and put it into their military. They had slaves and still do with all these plantation blacks sti kk sucking up to the rich white just like in the slave days. The same govt fund criminals and endless wars. If you’re afraid of your government that means they already won. That’s what they want. Fuck them. Do what you want as long as you’re not hurting anything or anyone
16:25 "If you get bit by a sand fly, they can infect you with a parasite, and that parasite basically becomes a flesh-eating disease, and then you can never get rid of it.... Um.... Check out this beautiful sunset." LOL
When he says about the handle looking like it was from Egypt... the Greeks learned the story of Atlantis from from the Egyptians. It just adds more sense to this hypothesis 🔥👌🏻
The ancient Egyptians said their civilization started in Atlantis. That's why the list of pharaohs goes back so many years for them. Because they count the civilization that came before them part of their own culture.
looks suspiciously like the 'predynasty' pottery they have found in Egypt- beautifully carved from single pieces of stone, then covered in 'poorly' done hieroglyphs suggesting they were inherited by the Egyptians from a more civilised culture
Check a map. That's like seeing a car being driven around Milwaukee that was built in Detroit, and saying that there must be a connection between Greece and Atlantis and Detroit. I would say that geographical proximity is a good enough explanation, no Atlantis or Greeks required.
Or washed 100 miles out into the Atlantic ocean from the giant sunamis that washed over after the meteorite/comet impacts. The water was so violent it may have simply ground any stone structure to dust/mud.
@@samualwhittemore228 Exactly right. Only the heaviest stuff would have stayed in the general area. The rest would be somwhere between the Richat structure and the ocean, if not IN the ocean.
...except of course for the surface structures that appear to resemble plato's description, the theory that this is atlantis is based in large part on these surface features looking like the concentric rings. If atlantis was buried, then those features would also be buried. If we have to dig to find atlantis then the surface feature appearance doesnt mean anything and thus the original "evidence" has no meaning.
Scientists say homo sapiens are about one hundred thousand to one twenty thousand years old. The history we know is about six thousand years old. If we are what we are today hundred thousand years in the past, what happened in the ninety four thousand years of lost history? If we could make all we have made in six thousand years, imagine what must have been in the lost ninety four thousand lost years of lost history. MAYBE every ten thousand years we go through some sort of global apocalyptic event and a reboot of human civilization.
@@chukanwanna1816 Every 12,000 years the poles shift causing cataclysmic disasters. We've not had written history for that long in this section of human history. Spoken history is like playing a game of telephone. It doesn't take long for the story to be distorted or lost entirely. Realistically if you wanted to completely forget a disaster of that magnitude it would only take a couple generations once the elders stopped talking about it. That is only 30-40yrs to ancient people's lifespans, not all that long. I don't understand why more people don't recognize this shifting that is happening. We don't have any knowledge on how quickly it happens or how violently. Everyone wants to point fingers at people and countries over "climate change" when it's something we can't control. Even if the shift was over the span of years and not instantaneous it would still shred everything we've developed.
Structures and cities under the Sahara desert would astonish and completely change every facet of history. More archaeological work needs to be done there. I believe it would also show the great river now called the Nile used to run east to west across Northern Africa and was home to hundreds if not thousands of cities, villages etc. the Sahara used to be green and lush, full of life.
You people are idiots. So the most advanced civilization ever, disappears in a single day. And NO contemporary civilizations make any mention of it for 9300 years until Plato writes about it as an allegory to the politics of Peloponnese Greece? No other civilization mentions it, Not some vague references, not one reference but 0. Not a single piece of broken clay, nothing. For 9300 years, until one (yes one) philosopher writes about them. That is like the US disappearing in a single day and no one ever mentioning it and there being no evidence of its existence until one guy in the year 11319 says "Oh by the way there was this place called the US once." The gullibility of people really has no measure. These are the types of people that fall for Nigerian email scams.
Dylon Strange good assumptions... nothing this guy put forward would be considered proof. Props for going out there and checking it out but I didn’t see any REAL research or science in this video. He just quotes Plato and shows of shots of the desert. As if to say, looks! It’s Atlantis!
@John Brennan You're wrong and that attitude you have shows your problem is that you cant accept Africas part in prehistory. As it stands currently, we know that some of the oldest hominid bones were found between africa and asia. That's a huge swath of land that is also connected. So, it is not far fetched to think our ancestors traveled back and forth between those lands. They also were building boats and travelling quicker than previously suspected. They didn't walk for thousands of miles when there were bodies of water that cut that time in half. They traveled vast distances and communicated with one another and interbred with one another. You and some people who think like you are quick to give credit to any non african cultures which shows that you are all too accepting of academias racist models.
John Brennan As an anthropologist, I find the spread of pseudo science to be very very damaging. Especially when it is tinged with racism. You telling me your version of history -based on what?- vs. What I have actually seen in actual sites, having held actual bone fragments and dated them in the lab with my own hands, just goes to show how screwed we are. No one believes or respects actual academics who dedicate entire careers to this but give someone a platform on RUclips and all of a sudden they know everything.
@John Brennan Listen, you simp! Reading comprehension is your friend. Learn how to comprehend. Because I never said that. Since you're not that bright but have the confidence of someone who is, I will just ignore you. You're wasting my time. I only engage with people who actually know what they're talking about.
Something t keep in mind. This structure has been sitting for thousands of years. After it was flooded, whatever was left over could easily have been taken. Maybe there is hardly anything there now as anything loose might have been picked clean. They had about 10k years or so to do that. The only answer is dig and go deep. That's what she said.
@@thevipgurlz2802 yeah, it was mental. I watched the documentary in the morning, and then randomly looked outside (which I rarely do at that time) Must have been fate
Do you know the one evidence that doesn’t! Atlantis was flooded when the continental ice sheets melted 12,000 years ago! Meaning before it got flooded the ocean levels were lower than they are now. Which would Mean if Atlantis did exist it’s remains Have to be below the current ocean levels not above them!
@@littlegreenbud2067 Yes, however it is hypothesized that the elevation of the Richat was 1000 feet lower than present and the presumed flooding was effectively inundated with mud etc. The truly beautiful thing about the Richat is the near exact measurements in comparison to Plato's description. So many questions... our assumptions are our greatest weakness.
In all likelihood, it is just a natural formation that was occasionally visited by nomads. No reasonable man can deny, however, that it EXACTLY matches Plato's geographical description of Atlantis. And its location south of the Senegal river (speculated, at the time, to connect with the Niger and Nile rivers), would place it in a 4th "lost continent" separate from Europe, Africa, and Asia. Indeed, the Ancients regarded the Nile river as dividing Africa from Asia, and the Tanais (now Ob) river Asia from Europe. This "4th continent" would certainly be bigger than "Africa" and "Asia" (as the Greeks knew them) combined, as Plato himself said. My best educated guess? The Phoenicians (who circumnavigated Africa 2,000 years before the Portuguese) sighted and mapped the Richat structure. And following their return to the Mediterranean, they (incorrectly) described it as the ruins of a great imperial city. The Egyptians, in turn, misidentified it with the "Atlantes" (from around present-day Morocco) with whom they and the Minoans had fought a very bloody war 8,000 years earlier.
super xstrah Of course! Don't you listen to his videos? Much of what he say is a lie. Let's start with Khufu's being in the "Center if Earth's Land Mass". Did he forget to tell you that point is actually located near the Earth's core? THAT'S JUST A START!!!
Thank you so much for this video. The first time I saw "The Eye Of The Sahara", I also thought it must be Atlantis. I'm so glad you personally went, and showed the flat area that comprised the concentric circles. I'm just so grateful. The location also seems perfect for Plato's description. I really believe in my heart that was Atlantis.
so its said that the rings and the structure as a whole was formed through natural means- and that can be explained through some sort of volcanic activity. i fully believe that if said activity created rings of water then that'd be extremely attractive for a civilization to build on it and that's probably why atlantis had the ring-like structure in the first place
Thank you for having 40 min of straight up useful and fascinating content. I appreciate what Josh from WAM has sacrificed for us but I learned more valuable information from this than his 3 hour travel log.
I agree. I think Josh put more emphasis on his journey to the Richat, how to get there, the challenges he experienced to get there, what it feels to get there. And he had 2 companies who seemed to be not really as passionate as Josh about the Richat and the entire journey. Josh never had much time to properly investigate on things at the Richat. Having said all that, this 39-minute video is far more interesting than that of Josh' 3-hour video.
@@fantasyflare I honestly wouldn't have minded if he just promoted the footage as a blog showing the difficulty any other amateur archeologists would have logistically faced as that was the vast majority of content with like 15% of it about actually looking around the richat.
The problem is that for the Sahara to have more water the entire world coastal would be under water. Maybe some previous global warming event caused by dinosaur farting. Jokes aside the Sahara is filled with dried rivers and to me it seems that it was raised from below.
Some people believe, due to the text of the “sinking” of Atlantis that maybe an earthquake had happened and it actually did sink into the sea and then maybe have also risen.
The Greenland meteor approx hit 13000 years which could have caused the flood that sank Atlantis :-O. www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/11/massive-crater-under-greenland-s-ice-points-climate-altering-impact-time-humans
Joe Allen not at all. 9,000 BC. The melting of the ice age, that’s what caused it to “sink” , it caused a massive rise in sea levels and massive tidal waves that took it out. You. Can literally see in Bright Insight’s vids on this exactly that. You can see where a massive amount of water washed in. The remnants of Atlantis are buried under the Sahara. They need to dig just a couple kilometers east of the structure.
One thing to keep in mind about Atlantis is that it probably fell into ruin over a thousand years before the deluge. There are stories in essentially every culture describing how the antediluvian gods more or less wiped each other out through infighting. So the city state may have been conquered, sacked, and perhaps even razed to the ground before being left to rot for a thousand years before the flood came and erased what was left. Just food for thought, because I know most people who look for Atlantis are expecting a more or less preserved ruin frozen in time, complete with artifacts, when in all likelihood the artifacts were looted by antediluvian survivors of the various wars that destroyed that civilization.
Except the first description of atlantis makes no mention of a war that destroyed atlantis. Just that it sank beneath the water in one day and night according to plato. Maybe your version was in a hollyweird movie.
@@woodspirit98 You have to look at Atlantis in the broader context of antediluvian civilization myths all around the world. Every culture around the globe has ancient stories of a golden age where there was high technology, and in every single case there are stories of wars using weapons that wiped out entire cities. The Greeks themselves record these wars in their mythology. You also find the same story in the Book of Enoch, and even in the Hindu myths.
According to Plato's ancient writings, didn't the destruction of Atlantis happen overnight? I do not believe it was left in ruins for over a thousand years before being washed away.
@@phoenixkb134 The legend of Atlantis, as over heard by Plato, yes. But it's like the mythologized stories of Homer. Based on actual events of the Golden Age, but who knows how many revisions and how condensed the stories are, and how they were allegorized. The first antediluvian king is recorded by the Greeks as Atlas, by the Babylonians as Alulim, and by the Jews as Assur. The Babylonian and Greek versions of the name have unknown pre Greek and Sumerian origins (i.e. they were adapted from another source language), and the meanings were lost. The Hebrew meaning, on the other hand, was preserved. The Hebrew root word for Assur essentially means "leader," as in the same sense as "dear leader" or "der Fuhrer." So it's apparently a title vs. a proper name. Which is very interesting because the Bible says that Nimrod was the first post diluvian king of Babylon, and changes his name to Assur when Babylon becomes an empire via the expansion into Nineveh. So apparently, Assur had connotations synonymous with the modern understanding of an emperor. Which fits with the idea that Atlantis had 10 kings, over which Atlas ruled as emperor. So an "Assur" was an emperor in that sense, apparently. More interesting, the ancient Babylonians considered themselves to be the post diluvian continuation of what the Greeks came to know at the Atlantean Empire. So apparently Nimrod saw himself as the post diluvian heir to Atlas' throne. Therefore, my conjecture is that the Jews kept a source language closer to the antediluvian language, and preserved more historically accurate accounts of the antediluvian world. Whereas the Babylonian and Greek versions suffered from the evolution of the language and all of the rise and fall of empires over thousands of years, and the various pagan religions that further mythologized the stories. And one of the Jews' oral traditions turned apocryphal book, Enoch, describes the antediluvian history in great detail, and it places the wars that destroyed the empire and its demigods about a thousand years prior to the deluge. So while the deluge itself probably did come in one day, as the Hebrew version suggests, the political destruction of the Atlantean Empire probably took place about a thousand years prior to the deluge. I believe the Hindu mythologies also describe those wars, and they talk about weapons that took out entire cities in one blow. I think that's generally what's described in the Greek mythology, too. Enoch describes the same thing, claiming that the demigods wiped each other out completely through infighting. They all sound like they're based on the same historical events. So I think you have people before the flood who were basically the refugees of a post apocalyptic world war scenario, and then only a few of them survived the flood that came a thousand years later. Then you had a very brief revival of the old Atlantean empire in the very, very early days of Babylon, that were quickly stamped out and lost to the sands of time. Also of note, the Jewish oral tradition has Abraham leaving Babylon while Nimrod is still alive. Actually, Abraham grew up outside of Babylon and didn't even return until he was fully grown. Speculation is that he was raised by Noah and Shem. So whatever the Tower of Babel event was that confused the original language, Abraham wouldn't have been affected by that. So it stands to reason that Abraham and his descendants would have been speaking whatever language was spoken in the antediluvian world. The Jews have always fancied that Hebrew is the antediluvian language, and I think the evidence strongly suggests they're more or less right.
I’ve seen a super old map that has the word "Atlantes" written in that exact region of modern day Mauritania That exact spot! .. I’m convinced .. put into account what a tsunami does to a place, Imagine what a whole damn ocean would do
@@tattoohodza lol admiral byrd... he wrote a book called Alone in the Antarctic, when he stayed in antarctica for several months by himself. In the book he describes the southern 24 hour sun which he dealt with incessantly for over a month of his stay. The earth is just a normal globe and byrd's own observations support that. The only nonsense about hollow earth is from a book called "the missing diary of admiral byrd" and is a fictional story not written by byrd.... it was published only after his death by his nephew. Its nonsense.
I admire your bravery to go and explore independetly on our behalf. Jimmy from bright insight is a smart man and alot of ppl can see that, and luckely a few are willing to go there and document it. Hopefully it will be excavated by archeologists and studied by scientists, who knows what they will find under the ground (remembre how deep gobekli tepe was burried?)
LOL Jimmy is great for bringing millennials stuck on their phone to reality in science exploration. I love Jimmy and his uploads, and just wanted to add that some of us are professionals here who've studied the Richat a few generations before yours' preemptively.
I agree that this location fits all the details of Atlantis. I am now living vicariously through you. I applaud your courage, sense of adventure, and willingness to pursue your passion.
I'm so happy to see others with same enthusiasm for this topic (and similar ancient history) as myself. I think everything that existed and went on here on Earth (like the Annunaki, etc.) if we knew without a doubt as certain, would blow our minds. That is, if our minds aren't already dazzled by the pieces of the vast puzzle we have so far.
Mike Relmor Would you mind detailing the missing details? Have you read all of Plato’s descriptions? This video might not mention everything described in the original sources, but the original person to propose this location goes into much more detail. It is hard to dismiss all the evidence.
fullswing Plato never saw the mountains around Atlantis. His writings only related what his ancestor had shared from what he learned from priests. Will you please comment with an actual quote from Plato’s writings that rules out this location as the possible site of Atlantis. Also, this guy literally is risking his life making this video. Show some respect, even if you do not agree with his theory. It takes almost no courage or effort to be a troll on RUclips.
When I first saw that bright insight video years ago, this is exactly what I hoped someone would do. Thank you for doing this. Hopefully a full team with excavation equipment begin to take this seriously
When I first saw that bright insight video I thought that guy was super dumb or super dishonest. I still don't know which. How is a city that drowned and left behind only mud supposed to be in the middle of a continent in the middle of the desert? Have you tried looking under the ocean where the legends say it is? Underwater? In an ocean? Oh wait maybe Atlantis is at the top of the Alps with Noah's Ark! Oh wait maybe Atlantis is on the Moon with Elvis!
@@headlessspaceman5681 I think you’re forgetting that oceans dry up over epochs, continents drift, cataclysms strike. Perhaps others aren’t dishonest or stupid, and maybe you’re simply not listening to theories, timelines, and evidence being presented. Closed minded and arrogant about it, you
@@headlessspaceman5681 first off, the Richat is not anywhere fucking close to the middle of the continent. It is 300 miles from the coast, Africa is 4700 miles across… Second if you genuinely believe that with how far science has come in the last 20 years, we wouldn’t make new discoveries about our history. Then you are an idiot. “Sure we now have radar imagery, satellite photos, and LIDAR ground scanning but I prefer to base my opinion on history books written in the 1950s before we had access to said technology.” How dumb do you sound..
Mathieu Nault-Maloney to me, it looks like a brick column maybe, or a section of a wall. There even looks like there might be some painting on it or something.
@@BustyNCrusty maybe it's a painting of a head or something. I also noticed 2 suspiciously square looking stones at 19:19. Still if this really was a large city as Plato described I think there would be some clearer signs that there was a large civilization living there. like a lot more square brick stones, some columns or some other signs.
For all intents and purposes: since the flood obviously wiped any 'construction' completely away [that would have existed on the Richat structure in antiquity--to include the bedrock 'foundation(s)'], any serious searches should be expanded to include the 'debris field' between the structure and the ocean... Lots of territory to cover, but that seems to be pretty much where any evidence would be.
If you mean the mythical Biblical flood, and if you mean you believe the Bible is historically accurate, then obviously Plato was a liar or a fabulist because the Bible says God created everything from nothing 6-7 thousand years ago, and Plato said Atlantis was built and destroyed 6 thousand years before that. So who's lying, God or Plato?
Dude, I take my hat off to you, you have some guts going into that part of the world. Its not just the flys that are dangerous. If I were you before your next trip, see if you can get some airborne ground penetrating radar images of the structure. And if you can some metal detectors with you next time. See if you can find the fresh and salt water wells in the center and maybe some of the ships still in port like were shown on the documentary if you can find a ship barried in the mud that amount of proof should be all that is needed to get a well funded and guarded group to excavate.
You are the first person, as far as I can tell, who mentioned the wells. That is one thing I wish he had looked for and put on video. I would also like to have seen the bones of a whale and the bones of an elephant.
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick you catch more flies with honey hunny. maybe if you didn't come off so nasty we would take your "evidence" into consideration with less of the SALTY you added in yourself. have you bothered looking at our evidence or you just spout out your mouth hole thinking you're always right. no one is going to listen to you with that trash attitude so you have options. grow um and treat others how you wanna be treated or keep thinking you're absolutely right and everyone else is wrong. Either way im good, i have enough salt in my life and not enough patience for you.
@fullswing havent really got deep into the alternative ancient history rabit hole of youtube to read on hancocks works so i dont have much of an idea yet. But i think that such channels do have merit in their theories and hypotheses.Nonetheless,we should at least make ground penetrating radar scans of the structure, this would either debunk or prove their theories and hypotheses on Atlantis
@Ken Penalosa The author of this video spent his own money to venture there... He took a huge risk... having money for paying bribes and moreover protection is paramount... travel cost is the least of your expense...
I would love to go with you! I'm a filmmaker, I adore ancient history and channels like Bright Insights with Jimmy. I've traveled to Peru and would love to be on your team!
Salvador Prado If he has no money how would he have been able to travel to Peru and have film equipment. Stop making people feel like shit because you feel like shit bum.
I came to think of Atlantis being swallowed by the sea as meaning by the sand. A lot of cultures in that area and the middle east consider the desert an ocean of sand or sea of sand. New evidence now points that the whole desert was a tropical paradise of forests and rivers as well.
If you look at that area of Africa from Google Earth, there appears to be some erosion of the land reaching from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic, kind of taking a curve or 2 along the way. Those mountains definitely look water-eroded. I think this site needs more exploration and digging.
At the time of Atlantis... Northern Africa was covered with jungle. It was a rainforest. Rivers that flow out to all directions, giant lakes were everywhere and there are carvings of humans with giraffes as if they are riding them. I want to thank you for your adventure to the Eye of the Sahara. What a trip! I've seen the google earth mapping of that area and the satellite images as well. There are some stone fortifications in the structure that you did not touch on. When is this planned trip back to the Rickat structure?
This is actually wrong. In the ice age it was actually even drier than today. The neolithic subpluvial started thousands of years AFTER Atlantis. Its insulting to the egyptians and keepers of history to even suggest Atlantis(the atlantic continent) is placed IN AFRICA. WTH.
Around 1.9 million people died in the battle of Stalingrad, which is almost twice as much as the entrie population of the city of Rome in 100 AD. I doubt Atlantis came even close (if it even existed).
This is absolutely fascinating. The mountains on approach look water eroded. Not to nitpick, but I wish you had brought a drone to get aerial views. There's definitely something about the eye of the Sahara that warrants further exploration.
I'd prefer getting a lydar team over there and see if any foundations are under the sand. I know whale bones and other things have been found. Obvious massive flood by soil and ariel views alone...as well as the vast salts in the structure itself.
first of all you are nuts for going there, secondly thank you for taking the risk that all of us wanted. I truthfully believe this place is all that remains of Atlantis...
@@giorgosgan4493 There should be a square structure. With some circular bits at the corners. Looks a bit like the walls of a fort. You might have to enter in the degree symbol manually. Hold alt and press 0176 and release to get a degree symbol. Also, I edited my original comment to use the symbol now, you should be able to copy and paste it.
I literally just stumbled on your video and I can't believe it was on here for the last 2 years and I never saw it! I really wish I had found you before you left on this trip! Because I've spent a massive amount of hours combing every inch of this location on Google Earth cataloging my finds that have me 100% convinced this is most definitely Atlantis. If I had hair I would have been pulling it all out as I just watched you walking around there after having come so close to so many locations that i could have directed you to that I'm also 100% sure would give you the proof you need to confidently say this is most definitely the lost city of Atlantis. I would have loved to have gone with you, but if I ever find myself not able to go somewhere like this I'll still be happy to offer whatever information I have, especially if it will lead to revealing the finding of Atlantis to the world. I'm just sick right now knowing I could have sent you directly to some amazing finds! Ugh!... I'd say more but I really think we should talk in private as soon as possible! Let me know the best way to contact you and hopefully will talk soon. Meanwhile I'm going to check out your other videos. Angel* PS...I'm still beating myself up for not finding this sooner... ugh!... 😔
How are there not more people talking about the eye of the Sahara.....? It is such a unique place. Go around and ask people and most of them won't even know it exists.
Mauretanians speak of a great ruler/King, and "coincidentally" went by the name Atlas www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNQ23Ce3knMWDKlzyPh9CDQPM8EJbQ:1574001260576&q=first+king+of+mauritania&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjlyYzQu_HlAhX7ShUIHQBBC8wQ1QIoAHoECAsQAQ&biw=1366&bih=657
svg lrd actuelly the ancient Kingdom is present day morocco not actual Mauritania i think Atlantis is in morocco it fits the map more and berber people have oral history that says the World was once underwater in morocco there is the Atlas mountains
Jeremy Kirkpatrick haha we Berber haves a creation story that is fading due to the fact that 99% of berber are muslim so obviously they dont believe in it anymore dumbass
The two things most Atlantis hunters forget or dismiss are the descriptions of thousands of kilometers of flats and the impassable mud. They are looking for little circular islands under the ocean, which isn't what Plato described. I think the little stones everywhere look suspicious. That place looks like it was pounded hard, really fast, like a Tsunami hit it. I wouldn't completely discount the idea of some megalithic structures, but the biggest stones shown in your video looked like slate, which would have just crumbled under any pressure at all. I think this is the right track, but not what people want to believe was Atlantis. Thanks for this video.
I have a video about Atlantis at my page with additional, new evidence to support the thesis. Feel free to have a look for it. I can't post links, yt simply deletes the post.
Seems reasonable to me for now. I can get on board with this until someone shows me the same kind of evidence you showed here about another location. Big thanks to Jimmy @BrightInsight for kicking this stuff into overdrive.
This geographically is impossible..it is off the coast near Spain as the ancient city of Tarsish was. Atlantis has been found already. However there are remarkable cities buried under mud, etc., after the flood of Noah's time in the Bible.
@@jamesstanley7951 now Homer, wasn't it?, wrote that Atlantis destroyed 900 or 9000 years prior to his time. Depending on how you interpret the writing. How would he know? But awhile ago I saw something that said the Mediterranean was a valley not a Sea. With lakes and rivers and fields etc. That known people lived there and traveled there. But I don't know what year that was suppose to be. But if 9000 years ago then people could have traveled to Atlantis by land. Strait of Gibraltar must have been a solid cliff from Spain to Africa, keeping the ocean out of the Mediterranean. Atlantis must have been beyond this cliff.
@@jamesstanley7951 Can you explain how it would be geographically impossible for the Richat Structure to potentially be the site of Atlantis? I'd love to hear your research.
@@aspenrebel it was Plato who had the story passed down his family line from Solon who lived around 600bc. When the Egyptians told Solon about how Atlantis was destroyed he asked how long ago did this happen and they replied 9,000 years ago. That gives us an actually date of around 11,500 years roughly give or take. The Egyptians traced their history back many thousands of years in their own hieroglyphs so it's not that far fetched for Solon to believe them. Edit: we know Solon was a real person who actually existed, very famous law maker I believe.
You can see that the rocks were once carved to have smooth surfaces, but the flood and the weathering just broke them up, and spreed them all over the place 22:11 .
I agree I was sitting here thinking that all of those rocks look like brick-shaped stones and tiles just thrown around the place. That would make sense. They had thousands of simple brick houses that would have had the force of a massive wave, similar to a shock wave hit them directly. Think of a blast from a nuclear bomb, we've all seen that video of housing and trees being blown away from the blast like they were nothing. The exact same scenario would have happened here. The water would have carried a lot of the infrastructure away. If I were to go there, I would look underground to see if they had a form of plumbing for water and effluent. If the wave only managed to cut away a metre or two off the top, maybe we could find something underneath. I would also dig in the mud because the water would have taken all the topsoil, including tools, toys and jewellery and dumped it in the channels. There were a few scenes there where the host completely missed rocks with construction carvings clearly on the outside.
Admire you actually getting out there. This has been my dream ever since watching Jimmy’s channel. BRING DRONES dude! Or bring me and I’ll supply the drones.
@@Ddub1083 I agree that the Richat Structure is an anomaly that is created by volcanic activity below the surface. I am absolutely not a geologist though. I do know what shale looks like, but I am not familiar with every rock type on the planet. That does look just like shale. It seems a bit shiny though? So, maybe lava. The breaking patterns look the way shale looks.
@@Itchypantz I think those are rhyolithic rocks. Though I dont doubt there is lots of shales as well. All the rocks that were on top of the volcanic spot wereexploded and dispersed all around the site and mixed with the volcanic rock that cool later. It wasnt just volcanic below the surface... the ringed structure is from a volcanic dome. It rose up and collapsed in upon itself at least 2 different times. This is what resulted in the various rings. VERY common with volcanic domes. In fact if you go to the Richat wiki... the very top photo of the site, you can see in the top left of the corner a small distance from Richat is another ringed structure. This was from another separate volcanic event that started with a dome building up and then collapsing. It looks like a target on the ground... just like richat. "Exposed within the interior of the Richat Structure are a variety of intrusive and extrusive igneous rocks. They include rhyolitic volcanic rocks, gabbros, carbonatites and kimberlites. The rhyolitic rocks consist of lava flows and hydrothermally altered tuffaceous rocks that are part of two distinct eruptive centers, which are interpreted to be the eroded remains of two maars. "
@@PhillipOnWater I think Jimmy mentioned it in one of the bright sight insight videos, the folks who did a documentary on it dug out the center to find fresh water, while everywhere else was salt water
I appreciate you describing it as simple and neolithic, but not megalithic. Have you talked to the locals living at the site? See if they know of any stories passed through oral traditions. Or perhaps they know of structures that were partially standing before their ancestors arrived.
The evidence of Atlantis existing there, will be in the small fragmented details. A massive Sea suddenly rushing in the ocean, won't leave much. Keep up the good work. I believe it could definitely have been Atlantis. The overall description of location, matching measurements, and the red, black, and white rock are definite pluses. I also believe that the design of the 'Eye of Egypt' is basically a map of Atlantis.
next time bring a drone... would give good perspective on size and where youre standing etc... very interesting... probably a lot of stuff under the Atlantic
@@mikesuniverse1789 And that is what I am saying... having worked in west Africa obtaining drone permits I am telling you - a hobbyist will not get one. It will take months or more to even find the person who believes they have the authority to make that decision and even if you find someone who might be willing the chances of being extorted and possibly having permission rescinded immediately is high. I am just warning folks that might take your suggestion seriously- be sure you have all documents in order because it is not a safe idea to bring this type of equipment to a remote location in a country you do not know on your own.
The exact same structure is a bit of a stretch but the possible continuity of using 3 colors for masonry seems very plausible and somewhat evident in the town's architecture. Interesting video!
I was sold on the Richat being Atlantis before watching this. The Herodotus map points almost right to it! Watching this just confirms things. A huge excavation needs to take place. At least some ground penetrating analysis. Great work on the video. Very informative.
Great respect for heading out there by yourself, we should start crowdfunding with Jimmy, you, and lots of enthusiasts and find the proof it takes to acquire real investments for the site excavation.
The map of solon, from my own findings and other RUclipsrs we all came to the same conclusion eye of Sahara otherwise known as Rachet of Sahara is atlantis.. And it matches with descriptions of plato mountains of north and all.. i have a theory on how its made but i am not good at making videos :/ maybe a book
@@jerrygibson6995 No Jerry, they have their heads infront of the camera Jerry. I didn't accuse him of having his head in the sand Jerry, thats on you. Head/camera.
If a giant, country-sized, tsunami had washed over the city from the south-west (as the visible structures show on google earth), then any remnants of human construction would have been washed away from the location toward the BASE of the mountains to the north and north-east. I suspect that any excavation/GPR would most profitably be conducted at those locations. Basically, though it's hard to comprehend the dynamics of a wave that size, there's probably a terminal moraine of debris at some point inland. Mountainous outcrops like those to the north should capture some of the heavier debris of the city even if they didn't block the wave (which clearly they didn't).
@@xxtoxii9615 I was thinking more of the debris of obvious HUMAN MANUFACTURE, like carved stone, pot shards etc, not random weathered rocks. If he'd found one credible example of "worked" rock in the several days there, he'd have shown it. (the closest he came was obviously ablated sedimentary rock layers)
@@xxtoxii9615 Sigh, yes, for I have eyes to see! ALL I WAS SUGGESTING was that, all things being equal, any systematic future search might better be directed where more artifacts might have been deposited as the actual site was very clearly lacking any significant items
@@poneill65 bunch of talk for simple proposition of archeological digging .what do you think that rocks would go how far if a tsunami hit? they would just roll a bit in the direction wave hit and much less when water started to retreat. and by the amount of that rubble it seams something is there and if u watched the video you would see a much bigger rocks being piled on a small hill. and artifacts being there also a shell is very significant dont you think.
13:00 Also, Atlantis would’ve sunk with the Younger Dryas event. So that would be farther from the Sumerian Empire than the Sumerian Empire is to us. We had to dig to find Sumer, it wasn’t on the very top. We may have to dig to find Atlantis, if any remains. Ofc, maybe not, as the tops of the rings are still plateaus. Maybe those rocks around are all that remains. However, like I said, you almost never find ancient ruins on the surface. And those ruins are all closer to today than Atlantis was to the ruined cities.
There is ancient artifacts (such as walls under ground) here is USA and no one cares that cites such as Rockwall near Austin are being built over them. No one stops u from digging in ur back yard.
The Original Archaeologists, it was not Jimmy ! A Team of German Archaeologist's actually re-discover Atlantis in 2008 and released a documentary called Visiting Atlantis in 2010 !
Thanks for the video, I've found myself thinking this could be the main city of Atlantis. Looking over the Richat, I found a funny looking structure at this location for which there is no description. If you end up going down there again, it could be worth your while looking around it. 21°07'13.25" N 11°16'35.60" W
according to the comments you need:
a drone, a shovel, a metal detector, a geologist and a jimmy from bright insight
Mr. Graham Hancock too
The first archeologists only had maybe one thing on the list a shovel. All of them must have passion! Totally my dream career!!
I would say go with LiDAR. Develop a 3D scan of as much of the area as you can. But you’re talk big$$$ & time. 🤑
I’m ready to go!
@J J lmao 😂😂😭
Dude actually went to the Eye of the Sahara
No shit
Poor Graham Hancock... Followers like this and he wonders why people do not take him seriously... Not his fault though... Morons abound
@fullswing y o u n g e r d r y a s i m p a c t c r a t e r i n g r e e n l a n d
fullswing have not watched any of those videos he made on Atlantis
fullswing you’re just ignorant
when guy explaining super far fetched things actually takes the time to put boots to ground.
100% respect. subbed
My man visited the freaking Eye Of Sahara like he is on a tour in Paris.
Yea but who was in Paris? 👀
@@benh720 Ninjas 😏
This is a very dangerous place to visit on many levels. My mans got cajones.
He is all types of a true badass.
@@abba1324
I loved you as a young 15 year old boy ABBA !
Ok we need a rich dude, a pilot, and a lydar operator.
Or education
I have a buddy with a lidar business
I’m a pilot. I have experience flying and landing on rough terrain. I volunteer.
You also need a guy named Bruce. Dont forget Bruce.
Education is making people dumb.
Imagine in a thousand years someone walking around in this flat desert like place and being like “so apparently this is the lost city of New York”
PLANET OF THE APES .....comes to mind
I do consider, some, last of us or horizon, type catastrophe. And hundreds or thousands of years later how they would try to make sense of our civilizations. We have the whole context because we live in it. But if it was all crumbled and you had no idea, it's hard to imagine what it would look like to someone then.
Or, the boat you're in takes a nice drift past the torch of the Statue of Liberty. Maybe tie up to the thing and take some pictures. Show the tops of the buildings that used to be Manhattan's skyline. :)
I can
Can not imagine that. Has no sense.
Guy says casually: there are these sand flies that can potentially infect you with a flesh eating parasite .... but oh look at the sunset
I used to live in the desert. But without all the violence and diseases this made me feel so homesick. T _ T
With a giant hole in the net at his forehead that is supposed to be over the brim of his hat. 🤦
@@amandarios448 I lived in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for awhile in the 1980's. We worked there at the time and often went to the desert. I know what you mean, it can be blazing hot but the evenings are so nice and so beautiful. Looking up at the stars alone is just breathtaking. I miss it too sometimes.
@@Janepint I live in a coastal area, you can Google "lençóis maranhenses" or "Delta Parnaíba" Brazil has a natural delta, where it's otherwise a desert and sand beaches.
There's a big Delta, and in the rainy season pools form between the dunes and form clear lakes.
Just the dunes or anywhere at the beach you can watch the sunset glow in ligh pink to deep purple, and the sky is the deepest blue, and when you go far from the city the shine of the stars is amazing and on a full moon the white sand almost looks glowing.
It's really breath taking, I went there many times to watch the sky and not gonna lie it's a nice relief when the temperature drops at night.
@@amandarios448 Oh my! This is a very different desert than I experiences. I can't believe how beautiful the sand and sea is in Brazil. Maybe one day I can experience that too. Looks Hot! I only do evening and night time. LOL Amanda Take care!
This guy travels to friggen Africa to document an anomalous structure:
films strictly in selfy stick mode.
And that tells you alot about why he's doing it....
Just exactly what I was thinking. Such a waste.
"I'm gona travel to Africa and take a video of myself"
He did reset the white balance once so we could see the sunset 🤣
common mistake which makes no sense . .,
I want to know what is under the sand at the south entrance. A single ship is all it would take to really change everything. I have no doubt the Sahara has an entire history beneath it.
Yes, that would be intensely cool. The trouble with finding a ship, or anything else, is the time frame. They just found a whole civilization buried under the Sahara (the Garamantian), but it's less than 2000 years old and the walls are now just a few feet high. A city at Richat would be 11,000 years old, yes? Even Plato said that nothing is left there, after repeated floods and washing away of all soft soil, etc. Even old foundational wall fragments might not have survived such a span of time. www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/11/111111-sahara-libya-lost-civilization-science-satellites/
@@virginiatilley6467 That's true and the saddest part of it, possibly never finding anything due to the extreme circumstances.
Just start digging
Frank Castle what the hell? 😂 it used to be a lush jungle idiot. Look at the research.
Frank Castle Africa is a ginormous continent which has been home to a great multitude of peoples, Civilizations, etc throughout the many millennia - I’ve only ever heard ignorant racists here in the west use that saying when referring to sub-Saharan Africans, as if those were the only people to ever call Africa home.
I'm 54 years old. It would be one of the greatest discoveries in history if it could be proved, and I hope it can happen in my lifetime. You sir, are truly an inspiration, for your courage in traveling to such a dangerous location to get to the truth.
richard bidinger I concur! A great accomplishment for archeology within my life time. I am 54 years old also.
Unlikely.
Plato was making a allegory.
To the extent that he talks about "Ancient Athens" At the same time...
A time at which Athens didn't exist, and the government he describes sure as hell didn't.
He also goes on at length about the Atlantis Counqcouring most of the Mediterranean, at a time when we have records of... nothing like that happening.
@@captainseyepatch3879 We do have evidence...unfortunately for some the people living on earth were all black
@@ghjk75 Even the Chinese ones?
@@bigrick3267 You right, black the wrong term. Deeply melanated and descended (physically and culturally) from Africa. Is that better?
something that caught my eye buddy......the sheer amount of small stones on the rings vs the amount of stones outside of the structure...….almost seems like those ARE the rubble from a city scattered across the rings
conap31 this is exactly what i was thinking! The amount of debris in the area.... what is left of the structures once built there!!! Amazing!!!
I guess the only way to know for sure would be to look for carvings and paintings on the rocks
How amazing would that be if you did find some small tidbits on the rocks.....
I'm pretty much sold on the idea this is atlantis..
The Plato and Herodotus map thing is kinda the icing on the cake.
So to find a piece of atlantis with writing on it.....would be something you could never forget.
Hell one one the most surreal experiences I've ever had was climbing the step pyramids in the Rivera....this blows that out of the water
Lps Mckenna I thought the same thing. Look at the cuts of the stones as if they were stacked? Interesting
@@sentineljack1984 hmmmm.......ABSOLUTELY!
the sphinx was almost buried in sand in less than 2000 years. imagine how deep you should dig to find something there...
Nothing a backhoe and some guy on stimulants couldn't can't knock out in a few weeks
While thats true this place was washed away not buried over time. Doesn’t mean an excavation wont turn anything up but most if any evidence is left itd be somewhere in the Atlantic ocean.
There wouldn’t be anything there anyways, if the flood is true, then it would’ve wiped everything out all the way down to the bedrock, so anything that was sitting on the top soil would’ve been crushed into a million pieces.
@@rocksjoshua Not so sure. There is evidence of explosions in several pyramids in Egypt including the Great pyramid. It makes sense that a sea water flood would cause such an explosion in a resonant structure. It is easily possible those pyramids were flooded some 12k yrs ago and stopped working. This flood was probably a result of an asteroid impact and it was not as disastrous as the previous flood described by Summerians and the Bible some 60k yrs ago. It all makes quite sense. Different cause of the flood, different results. The first flood is described by Summerians as a result of planetary collision (close encounter), the second flood is recognized by the modern scholars as an asteroid impact. It´s simply possible...
You realize that there is salt, you also see where there where rivers in the mountains, and can see remnants of water erosion over the land. The water currents would have been way to strong and would have ripped the bedrock away.
"If you get bit by a sand fly you can get a flash-eating parasite and you can't get rid of it. Check out this beautiful sunset"
Kyler Smith was laughing at that as well
Leishmaniasis- a lot of Iraqi war vets got this. Initially it had to be cut out, I believe they found ways to treat it now though.
Good, cuz flash is outdated tech anyway.
@@TheMijaras yes, one of my squadmates had a nasty crater in his arm from one (desert storm)
homie doesn't give a flying fock
It’s crazy how much “rubble” is on the ground. It looks like a demolition sight where the only thing left are broken up pieces of concrete foundation are littered everywhere.
My thoughts exactly.....he said they were NOT megalithic builders....as he walks through an obliterated debri feild of small rubble, that once was huge megaliths, before the destruction.....he's literally walking on the evidence.....get a shovel and dig.......he doesnt look like hes into doing the work, but only walk around to see whats on top, in plain veiw....he has no idea what lies beneath his feet.....nor dont I think he researched much prior, as he went during the hottest time of year...120°, lol
@@johnappleby2182 First, that place is huge. Miles in diameter. There's a reason excavation takes so long, is so expensive, and requires so much manpower. Try going out there with a single shovel and see how far you get before collapsing. Second, it's just illegal.
@@calebalwayswill7423 , i only wish i could , but your absolutely right..... If just anybody could walk in there and start digging I'm sure they would have long before now and all the ously some have as stone relics have been found and some very interesting granite pieces, I might add...
Im literally envious, as well as grateful, that he simply made the hands on journey to this amazing site and the priveledge to be guided safely and ogle the site , itself, is miraculous, in my oppinion...i only wish i could, lol....
My sincerest appologies, if my first comment seemed negative or offensive , in any way, as this was not my intent to criticize , ridicule or mock, these fantastic efforts......I only wish I could...
Not concrete dude , concrete wasn't invented yet !
@@NOTTHASAME key word , "Like"
We have to remember that Plato was far removed in time from the supposed time of Atlantis. To put that into perspective ancient Egypt and modern day civilization are closer in time than Plato was to the time Atlantis was said to have existed.
Much respect for going out there and investigating this for yourself.
Yeah, and that his description of Atlantis and its demise perfectly fits with the very recent discoveries of massive impact craters from exactly that time period. Amazing.
We should also remember that in Plato's story he talkes about "Ancient Athens" being around at the same time...
When no one lived in the area of Athens at the time. And there sure as hell was no major city.
Plato was making a alagory.
@@captainseyepatch3879 aswell as the atlantis info is not necessarily his story but just information that has been passed down from generation to generation... Critias was Plato's great grandfather who heard the story from Dropides, (his grandfather) who in turn heard the story from Solon and solon heard it from Egyptians. Its like his great great grandfather head about it from a friend who heard it from a Egyptian friend.
I like how you give supporting evidence without overbearing bias or opinion and let people decide for themselves. It really is a compelling argument, world history is an amazing thing and I don’t think that our current knowledge comes close to a complete picture of ancient civilizations. A lot of times it’s unpopular to postulate these things because “we’re smart so we know everything that’s happened” while denying any other arguments as pseudoscience. Great job and courage to follow your passion and do this!
It is not "supporting evidence." There is no dating nor provenance for the artifacts shown. It is not a compelling argument unless you don't understand the definition of "argument" and "compelling." It is a made-up fantasy. It's as real as Valhalla and Heaven and Hades.
Troy was a myth until someone put a shovel into the ground, next time take one with you.
@First Last Trojan Ruins is on Google maps.
@First Last dude you have google, jesus think
First Last It’s in Northern Turkey which was at the time inhabited by Greeks and was thought to be a Greek kingdom or city state much like Sparta and Athens
😂😂🤣🤣😭😭
A drone would have been important.
A video review of variations in rocks found in the area.
... and why video yourself the whole time??? I mean, you went all the way there and we're stuck looking at your face. Seriously, you goon?
If you are looking for artifacts you need to understand the flow pattern of the flood water the first smash in toward the Sahara and then the slower outflow back to the sea. The mud area is highly likely to contain what you are looking for.
thats right,the mud area, the best place to search for surface materials
I’ve watched two videos of people going to the richat structure so far after seeing @brightinsight ‘s video on the theory of it being Atlantis. The biggest contributing factor to the lack of archeological evidence is that Atlantis was supposed to have been buried by the “sea”(the ocean in reality)...likely, with the force of the ocean, everything would be under the earth at this point, as flood don’t just bring water, they bring massive amounts of sand/mud/rocks/whatever else, And definitely, debris would be pulled to the south west due to the receding of the waters.
Either way, it will be very difficult to find anything on the surface. And since the government has made it illegal to utilize any kind of sonar mapping or other technologies to see what’s under the ground, it is likely going to be awhile before any new evidence is found. That being said, it isn’t right to deny the possibility of this being the location, as I saw in the other video, and it’s not right to stop looking!
I would like to point out that the reason given in the other video for this is that the government doesn’t want any gold to be taken from their land and doesn’t want any kind of damage to be done to the area. I think if the right people with the right interpreters spoke with some of the higher up government officials, in a safe manner of course, showing the abscence of greed for profit to be made, and sharing their desire to respect the land, an agreement could be reached. I would like to look more into the government in that area.🙏🏼🙏🏼
Yeah but what we see from satellite imagery is due to wind errosion, not some massive flood plain. Any flood that would have occurred there would have had its evidence long since buried. If you wanted to really argue the point that would require taking soil samples and comparing them to samples taken from the coast lines on either end of the supposed flood plain.
What about the stuffs that are too heavy to be pulled back to the sea ? The force of pushing is stroger than pulling, the same way of the flood, thats why stuffs are destroyed by floods even if its sturdy buildings but when its receding the heavy stuffs remains on the ground, same thing in aceh, indonesia.
Mark Smith fuck the government. Why let that stop you? No one is going to go up to you. People need to remember that we run our lives not the governments. The fact that the word government literally meant to govern your mind in Latin should wake you the fuck up. The government doesn’t this the government doesn’t that. Man fuck them. They take all your govt money and put it into their military. They had slaves and still do with all these plantation blacks sti kk sucking up to the rich white just like in the slave days. The same govt fund criminals and endless wars. If you’re afraid of your government that means they already won. That’s what they want. Fuck them. Do what you want as long as you’re not hurting anything or anyone
16:25 "If you get bit by a sand fly, they can infect you with a parasite, and that parasite basically becomes a flesh-eating disease, and then you can never get rid of it.... Um.... Check out this beautiful sunset." LOL
When he says about the handle looking like it was from Egypt... the Greeks learned the story of Atlantis from from the Egyptians. It just adds more sense to this hypothesis 🔥👌🏻
ye
The ancient Egyptians said their civilization started in Atlantis. That's why the list of pharaohs goes back so many years for them. Because they count the civilization that came before them part of their own culture.
looks suspiciously like the 'predynasty' pottery they have found in Egypt- beautifully carved from single pieces of stone, then covered in 'poorly' done hieroglyphs suggesting they were inherited by the Egyptians from a more civilised culture
Check a map. That's like seeing a car being driven around Milwaukee that was built in Detroit, and saying that there must be a connection between Greece and Atlantis and Detroit. I would say that geographical proximity is a good enough explanation, no Atlantis or Greeks required.
If there's anything left from Atlantis it's most likely buried under the Sahara.
Or washed 100 miles out into the Atlantic ocean from the giant sunamis that washed over after the meteorite/comet impacts. The water was so violent it may have simply ground any stone structure to dust/mud.
@@samualwhittemore228 Exactly right. Only the heaviest stuff would have stayed in the general area. The rest would be somwhere between the Richat structure and the ocean, if not IN the ocean.
The only people left are the Toureg and Rguibat....The elderly over there speak/read the same ancient language according to Klaus Dona.....
...except of course for the surface structures that appear to resemble plato's description, the theory that this is atlantis is based in large part on these surface features looking like the concentric rings. If atlantis was buried, then those features would also be buried. If we have to dig to find atlantis then the surface feature appearance doesnt mean anything and thus the original "evidence" has no meaning.
@@Ddub1083 dig dig dig
In 10,000 years divers will be diving where New York City once existed and questioning whether or not that was the actual location or not.
Scientists say homo sapiens are about one hundred thousand to one twenty thousand years old.
The history we know is about six thousand years old.
If we are what we are today hundred thousand years in the past, what happened in the ninety four thousand years of lost history?
If we could make all we have made in six thousand years, imagine what must have been in the lost ninety four thousand lost years of lost history.
MAYBE every ten thousand years we go through some sort of global apocalyptic event and a reboot of human civilization.
@@chukanwanna1816 Every 12,000 years the poles shift causing cataclysmic disasters. We've not had written history for that long in this section of human history. Spoken history is like playing a game of telephone. It doesn't take long for the story to be distorted or lost entirely. Realistically if you wanted to completely forget a disaster of that magnitude it would only take a couple generations once the elders stopped talking about it. That is only 30-40yrs to ancient people's lifespans, not all that long.
I don't understand why more people don't recognize this shifting that is happening. We don't have any knowledge on how quickly it happens or how violently. Everyone wants to point fingers at people and countries over "climate change" when it's something we can't control. Even if the shift was over the span of years and not instantaneous it would still shred everything we've developed.
@@phenom573 amen to both of you, pity people dont think this way
@@phenom573 Dude exactly! People have politicized a natural phenomenon that happens every few thousands of years and the gullible masses eat it up.
Stephanie Jones Make it LA and I'm in.
Hey man some of your "just boulders" actually look like they were at one point part of a wall or something.
Really? WOW!! I this have that bridge in Brooklyn for sale.
How did he miss that
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick You can try the West Coast of Massachusetts. Fauxcahontas says so.
@@aspenrebel West coast of Mass? ridiculous.
@@schoolhomevrtechnologyassi6286 That's what she said!! Our wonderful and brilliant transplant Okie U.S. Rep. She said "the West Coast of Mass".
Some drone footage would be a great addition to this
Structures and cities under the Sahara desert would astonish and completely change every facet of history. More archaeological work needs to be done there. I believe it would also show the great river now called the Nile used to run east to west across Northern Africa and was home to hundreds if not thousands of cities, villages etc. the Sahara used to be green and lush, full of life.
They already have found city structures under the Sahara very recently. As well as many ancient river networks.
There are thousands of ancient riverbeds throughout Africa that have been discovered via satellite imaging recently.
No it would Not Change anything, Just some more settlements that got abandoned
Pretty sure it went west to east.
No..
Buy a drone, could do so much more with high altitude shots and 4K aerial footage.
Could do much without the selfies.
Could do much without the mic picking up the constant moving around.
Could do much without the narration.
Lord Lorax alright, chill yah beans. This video is loaded with good info.
You people are idiots.
So the most advanced civilization ever, disappears in a single day. And NO contemporary civilizations make any mention of it for 9300 years until Plato writes about it as an allegory to the politics of Peloponnese Greece?
No other civilization mentions it, Not some vague references, not one reference but 0. Not a single piece of broken clay, nothing. For 9300 years, until one (yes one) philosopher writes about them.
That is like the US disappearing in a single day and no one ever mentioning it and there being no evidence of its existence until one guy in the year 11319 says "Oh by the way there was this place called the US once."
The gullibility of people really has no measure. These are the types of people that fall for Nigerian email scams.
Dylon Strange good assumptions... nothing this guy put forward would be considered proof. Props for going out there and checking it out but I didn’t see any REAL research or science in this video. He just quotes Plato and shows of shots of the desert. As if to say, looks! It’s Atlantis!
@@gold333 have you taken a look at mud fossil university on RUclips ? 900 mile long dragon remains north of where this vid was taken..
If you look at the region in google maps, you can see how the terrain or sand sweeps into the Atlantic Ocean as if there was a massive flood.
that was from,.. the flood! (i think an asteroid struck the ocean and fucked everyones day up!)
Ciro Singleterry Yop. Right into the Cape Verde Islands.
@John Brennan You're wrong and that attitude you have shows your problem is that you cant accept Africas part in prehistory. As it stands currently, we know that some of the oldest hominid bones were found between africa and asia. That's a huge swath of land that is also connected. So, it is not far fetched to think our ancestors traveled back and forth between those lands. They also were building boats and travelling quicker than previously suspected. They didn't walk for thousands of miles when there were bodies of water that cut that time in half. They traveled vast distances and communicated with one another and interbred with one another. You and some people who think like you are quick to give credit to any non african cultures which shows that you are all too accepting of academias racist models.
John Brennan As an anthropologist, I find the spread of pseudo science to be very very damaging. Especially when it is tinged with racism. You telling me your version of history -based on what?- vs. What I have actually seen in actual sites, having held actual bone fragments and dated them in the lab with my own hands, just goes to show how screwed we are. No one believes or respects actual academics who dedicate entire careers to this but give someone a platform on RUclips and all of a sudden they know everything.
@John Brennan Listen, you simp! Reading comprehension is your friend. Learn how to comprehend. Because I never said that. Since you're not that bright but have the confidence of someone who is, I will just ignore you. You're wasting my time. I only engage with people who actually know what they're talking about.
“....It becomes a flesh eating disease and then you can never get rid of it... ooo look at that sunset!”
I got a chuckle from that. I wish the guy would give us an update, so we know his flesh didn't get eaten alive.
Next time get a metal detector with you.
@@cyberblock7619 how? why?
against the law in that area i think
@@cyberblock7619 says the one with a pink profile picture
@@YOUSSEF9587 cause I like pussy
@@SEXCOPTER_RUL Lets have a Gay-off
Something t keep in mind. This structure has been sitting for thousands of years. After it was flooded, whatever was left over could easily have been taken. Maybe there is hardly anything there now as anything loose might have been picked clean. They had about 10k years or so to do that. The only answer is dig and go deep. That's what she said.
Well, this is actually what i wanted to See my whole life
I saw it from the plane by mistake!
Same
@@factcheckingyourmum lucky mistake.
Agree..on satellite you can see how the wave went trough the continent.
@@thevipgurlz2802 yeah, it was mental. I watched the documentary in the morning, and then randomly looked outside (which I rarely do at that time)
Must have been fate
I’m starting to believe this is Atlantis. There’s is is so much evidence to support it
Do you know the one evidence that doesn’t! Atlantis was flooded when the continental ice sheets melted 12,000 years ago! Meaning before it got flooded the ocean levels were lower than they are now. Which would Mean if Atlantis did exist it’s remains Have to be below the current ocean levels not above them!
@@littlegreenbud2067 Yes, however it is hypothesized that the elevation of the Richat was 1000 feet lower than present and the presumed flooding was effectively inundated with mud etc. The truly beautiful thing about the Richat is the near exact measurements in comparison to Plato's description.
So many questions... our assumptions are our greatest weakness.
If it’s not Atlantis, it definitely was some sort of ancient civilization at one point
In all likelihood, it is just a natural formation that was occasionally visited by nomads.
No reasonable man can deny, however, that it EXACTLY matches Plato's geographical description of Atlantis. And its location south of the Senegal river (speculated, at the time, to connect with the Niger and Nile rivers), would place it in a 4th "lost continent" separate from Europe, Africa, and Asia. Indeed, the Ancients regarded the Nile river as dividing Africa from Asia, and the Tanais (now Ob) river Asia from Europe. This "4th continent" would certainly be bigger than "Africa" and "Asia" (as the Greeks knew them) combined, as Plato himself said.
My best educated guess? The Phoenicians (who circumnavigated Africa 2,000 years before the Portuguese) sighted and mapped the Richat structure. And following their return to the Mediterranean, they (incorrectly) described it as the ruins of a great imperial city. The Egyptians, in turn, misidentified it with the "Atlantes" (from around present-day Morocco) with whom they and the Minoans had fought a very bloody war 8,000 years earlier.
@@grantorino2325 if there was fresh water it was probably more than nomad pit stop
At least a culture. There are no found evidences of a civilisation.
@@ahenathon how about dig in the dirt a little you might find your evidence
@@chuckchuck4016 So dig then.
why dont you collaborate with jimmy from bright insight?
YES!
Humberto De Armas
I hope you"re not gullible enough to believe that STUPID JERK JIMMY AT BRIGHT INSIGHT. HE'S A STRAIGHT OUT LIAR!!!
@@catman8965 prove it
super xstrah
Of course! Don't you listen to his videos? Much of what he say is a lie. Let's start with Khufu's being in the "Center if Earth's Land Mass". Did he forget to tell you that point is actually located near the Earth's core? THAT'S JUST A START!!!
@@catman8965 dude ur a fuckin idiot
Thank you so much for this video. The first time I saw "The Eye Of The Sahara", I also thought it must be Atlantis. I'm so glad you personally went, and showed the flat area that comprised the concentric circles. I'm just so grateful. The location also seems perfect for Plato's description. I really believe in my heart that was Atlantis.
And it is, watch the original documentary
it's called Visiting Atlantis ! it was released in 2010
mee too
so its said that the rings and the structure as a whole was formed through natural means- and that can be explained through some sort of volcanic activity. i fully believe that if said activity created rings of water then that'd be extremely attractive for a civilization to build on it and that's probably why atlantis had the ring-like structure in the first place
"If you get bitten by this fly, you get this flesh eating disease that you can never get rid of... Hey! Checkout this beautiful sunset!" LOL LOL
the worst kind of duty-free souvenirs... 🤦♂️
Come Join me on my next trip to the Richat.
Dont be a racist
Thank you for having 40 min of straight up useful and fascinating content. I appreciate what Josh from WAM has sacrificed for us but I learned more valuable information from this than his 3 hour travel log.
I agree. I think Josh put more emphasis on his journey to the Richat, how to get there, the challenges he experienced to get there, what it feels to get there. And he had 2 companies who seemed to be not really as passionate as Josh about the Richat and the entire journey. Josh never had much time to properly investigate on things at the Richat. Having said all that, this 39-minute video is far more interesting than that of Josh' 3-hour video.
Yeah totally agree the WAM special was painfully long. Like the bonus making of DVD extended double disc bonus feature lol.
@@fantasyflare I honestly wouldn't have minded if he just promoted the footage as a blog showing the difficulty any other amateur archeologists would have logistically faced as that was the vast majority of content with like 15% of it about actually looking around the richat.
I missed a number in how long I thought this was. I'll finish it later.
Maybe Atlantis was created at the time of the african humid period, when the Sahara was green.
The problem is that for the Sahara to have more water the entire world coastal would be under water. Maybe some previous global warming event caused by dinosaur farting. Jokes aside the Sahara is filled with dried rivers and to me it seems that it was raised from below.
Some people believe, due to the text of the “sinking” of Atlantis that maybe an earthquake had happened and it actually did sink into the sea and then maybe have also risen.
Right, if you were to take the date given by Plato of 9600 B.C. then that would be in the middle of the African Humid Period
The Greenland meteor approx hit 13000 years which could have caused the flood that sank Atlantis :-O. www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/11/massive-crater-under-greenland-s-ice-points-climate-altering-impact-time-humans
Joe Allen not at all. 9,000 BC. The melting of the ice age, that’s what caused it to “sink” , it caused a massive rise in sea levels and massive tidal waves that took it out. You. Can literally see in Bright Insight’s vids on this exactly that. You can see where a massive amount of water washed in. The remnants of Atlantis are buried under the Sahara. They need to dig just a couple kilometers east of the structure.
One thing to keep in mind about Atlantis is that it probably fell into ruin over a thousand years before the deluge. There are stories in essentially every culture describing how the antediluvian gods more or less wiped each other out through infighting. So the city state may have been conquered, sacked, and perhaps even razed to the ground before being left to rot for a thousand years before the flood came and erased what was left. Just food for thought, because I know most people who look for Atlantis are expecting a more or less preserved ruin frozen in time, complete with artifacts, when in all likelihood the artifacts were looted by antediluvian survivors of the various wars that destroyed that civilization.
Except the first description of atlantis makes no mention of a war that destroyed atlantis. Just that it sank beneath the water in one day and night according to plato. Maybe your version was in a hollyweird movie.
@@woodspirit98 You have to look at Atlantis in the broader context of antediluvian civilization myths all around the world. Every culture around the globe has ancient stories of a golden age where there was high technology, and in every single case there are stories of wars using weapons that wiped out entire cities. The Greeks themselves record these wars in their mythology. You also find the same story in the Book of Enoch, and even in the Hindu myths.
According to Plato's ancient writings, didn't the destruction of Atlantis happen overnight? I do not believe it was left in ruins for over a thousand years before being washed away.
@@phoenixkb134 The legend of Atlantis, as over heard by Plato, yes. But it's like the mythologized stories of Homer. Based on actual events of the Golden Age, but who knows how many revisions and how condensed the stories are, and how they were allegorized.
The first antediluvian king is recorded by the Greeks as Atlas, by the Babylonians as Alulim, and by the Jews as Assur. The Babylonian and Greek versions of the name have unknown pre Greek and Sumerian origins (i.e. they were adapted from another source language), and the meanings were lost. The Hebrew meaning, on the other hand, was preserved. The Hebrew root word for Assur essentially means "leader," as in the same sense as "dear leader" or "der Fuhrer." So it's apparently a title vs. a proper name.
Which is very interesting because the Bible says that Nimrod was the first post diluvian king of Babylon, and changes his name to Assur when Babylon becomes an empire via the expansion into Nineveh. So apparently, Assur had connotations synonymous with the modern understanding of an emperor. Which fits with the idea that Atlantis had 10 kings, over which Atlas ruled as emperor. So an "Assur" was an emperor in that sense, apparently.
More interesting, the ancient Babylonians considered themselves to be the post diluvian continuation of what the Greeks came to know at the Atlantean Empire. So apparently Nimrod saw himself as the post diluvian heir to Atlas' throne.
Therefore, my conjecture is that the Jews kept a source language closer to the antediluvian language, and preserved more historically accurate accounts of the antediluvian world. Whereas the Babylonian and Greek versions suffered from the evolution of the language and all of the rise and fall of empires over thousands of years, and the various pagan religions that further mythologized the stories. And one of the Jews' oral traditions turned apocryphal book, Enoch, describes the antediluvian history in great detail, and it places the wars that destroyed the empire and its demigods about a thousand years prior to the deluge. So while the deluge itself probably did come in one day, as the Hebrew version suggests, the political destruction of the Atlantean Empire probably took place about a thousand years prior to the deluge.
I believe the Hindu mythologies also describe those wars, and they talk about weapons that took out entire cities in one blow. I think that's generally what's described in the Greek mythology, too. Enoch describes the same thing, claiming that the demigods wiped each other out completely through infighting. They all sound like they're based on the same historical events. So I think you have people before the flood who were basically the refugees of a post apocalyptic world war scenario, and then only a few of them survived the flood that came a thousand years later. Then you had a very brief revival of the old Atlantean empire in the very, very early days of Babylon, that were quickly stamped out and lost to the sands of time.
Also of note, the Jewish oral tradition has Abraham leaving Babylon while Nimrod is still alive. Actually, Abraham grew up outside of Babylon and didn't even return until he was fully grown. Speculation is that he was raised by Noah and Shem. So whatever the Tower of Babel event was that confused the original language, Abraham wouldn't have been affected by that. So it stands to reason that Abraham and his descendants would have been speaking whatever language was spoken in the antediluvian world. The Jews have always fancied that Hebrew is the antediluvian language, and I think the evidence strongly suggests they're more or less right.
I’ve seen a super old map that has the word "Atlantes"
written in that exact region of modern day Mauritania
That exact spot! .. I’m convinced ..
put into account
what a tsunami does to a place,
Imagine what a whole damn ocean would do
amel dizdarevic my. brother. has a hollow earth map from admeriel byrd
James Harder earthquake tectonic plates pushed it all out the ocean and the water leaveing that area.. probley. butterfly effect tsunami.
Threw The Looking Glass post it broooo.. I wanna see
@@tattoohodza lol admiral byrd... he wrote a book called Alone in the Antarctic, when he stayed in antarctica for several months by himself. In the book he describes the southern 24 hour sun which he dealt with incessantly for over a month of his stay. The earth is just a normal globe and byrd's own observations support that. The only nonsense about hollow earth is from a book called "the missing diary of admiral byrd" and is a fictional story not written by byrd.... it was published only after his death by his nephew. Its nonsense.
Ddub1083 wow bro, I’ll check it out, ty
I admire your bravery to go and explore independetly on our behalf. Jimmy from bright insight is a smart man and alot of ppl can see that, and luckely a few are willing to go there and document it. Hopefully it will be excavated by archeologists and studied by scientists, who knows what they will find under the ground (remembre how deep gobekli tepe was burried?)
Excavated by archeologists, studied by scientists, lied about by priests, buried again by elitists. ;(
Hopefully not studied by archeaolgists
LOL Jimmy is great for bringing millennials stuck on their phone to reality in science exploration. I love Jimmy and his uploads, and just wanted to add that some of us are professionals here who've studied the Richat a few generations before yours' preemptively.
I really liked the Bright Insight videos but there's nothing like (virtually) seeing it in person.
@@nighthawkviper6791 you sound very interesting, please elaborate for I am a millenial. It's good to hear this was studied before.
I agree that this location fits all the details of Atlantis. I am now living vicariously through you. I applaud your courage, sense of adventure, and willingness to pursue your passion.
I'm so happy to see others with same enthusiasm for this topic (and similar ancient history) as myself. I think everything that existed and went on here on Earth (like the Annunaki, etc.) if we knew without a doubt as certain, would blow our minds. That is, if our minds aren't already dazzled by the pieces of the vast puzzle we have so far.
It only has about 1/3 of the details.... check it’s elevation....
Mike Relmor Would you mind detailing the missing details? Have you read all of Plato’s descriptions? This video might not mention everything described in the original sources, but the original person to propose this location goes into much more detail. It is hard to dismiss all the evidence.
fullswing That’s why we need videos such as this one to prompt some excavations in the area. 😊👍🏻
fullswing Plato never saw the mountains around Atlantis. His writings only related what his ancestor had shared from what he learned from priests.
Will you please comment with an actual quote from Plato’s writings that rules out this location as the possible site of Atlantis.
Also, this guy literally is risking his life making this video. Show some respect, even if you do not agree with his theory. It takes almost no courage or effort to be a troll on RUclips.
When I first saw that bright insight video years ago, this is exactly what I hoped someone would do. Thank you for doing this. Hopefully a full team with excavation equipment begin to take this seriously
When I first saw that bright insight video I thought that guy was super dumb or super dishonest. I still don't know which. How is a city that drowned and left behind only mud supposed to be in the middle of a continent in the middle of the desert? Have you tried looking under the ocean where the legends say it is? Underwater? In an ocean? Oh wait maybe Atlantis is at the top of the Alps with Noah's Ark! Oh wait maybe Atlantis is on the Moon with Elvis!
@@headlessspaceman5681 I think you’re forgetting that oceans dry up over epochs, continents drift, cataclysms strike. Perhaps others aren’t dishonest or stupid, and maybe you’re simply not listening to theories, timelines, and evidence being presented. Closed minded and arrogant about it, you
@@headlessspaceman5681t is entirely well known that the Sahara desert was once lush green land. Idiot
@@headlessspaceman5681 first off, the Richat is not anywhere fucking close to the middle of the continent. It is 300 miles from the coast, Africa is 4700 miles across… Second if you genuinely believe that with how far science has come in the last 20 years, we wouldn’t make new discoveries about our history. Then you are an idiot. “Sure we now have radar imagery, satellite photos, and LIDAR ground scanning but I prefer to base my opinion on history books written in the 1950s before we had access to said technology.” How dumb do you sound..
There’s a large stone at 20:01 that looks EXTREMELY INTERESTING. Like so it’s noticed!
What looks interesting about it if you dont mind me asking?
Mathieu Nault-Maloney to me, it looks like a brick column maybe, or a section of a wall. There even looks like there might be some painting on it or something.
@@BustyNCrusty maybe it's a painting of a head or something. I also noticed 2 suspiciously square looking stones at 19:19.
Still if this really was a large city as Plato described I think there would be some clearer signs that there was a large civilization living there. like a lot more square brick stones, some columns or some other signs.
All look like normal rocks to me lol
It looks flat throughout, it also caught my attention
It definitely looks like what those houses in the nearby village would look like if a tsunami hit them.
9:16 - 9:45 that stone looks like a paved walkway
YEEESSS
Definitely a cobblestone road! Good eye!
For all intents and purposes: since the flood obviously wiped any 'construction' completely away [that would have existed on the Richat structure in antiquity--to include the bedrock 'foundation(s)'], any serious searches should be expanded to include the 'debris field' between the structure and the ocean...
Lots of territory to cover, but that seems to be pretty much where any evidence would be.
If you mean the mythical Biblical flood, and if you mean you believe the Bible is historically accurate, then obviously Plato was a liar or a fabulist because the Bible says God created everything from nothing 6-7 thousand years ago, and Plato said Atlantis was built and destroyed 6 thousand years before that. So who's lying, God or Plato?
@@headlessspaceman5681 We'll see who's right once you're in hell, so... If you don't believe, then that's on you! Lol!
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@@headlessspaceman5681 "God" ... and his inventors of course. 🤗
Dude, I take my hat off to you, you have some guts going into that part of the world. Its not just the flys that are dangerous. If I were you before your next trip, see if you can get some airborne ground penetrating radar images of the structure. And if you can some metal detectors with you next time. See if you can find the fresh and salt water wells in the center and maybe some of the ships still in port like were shown on the documentary if you can find a ship barried in the mud that amount of proof should be all that is needed to get a well funded and guarded group to excavate.
You are the first person, as far as I can tell, who mentioned the wells. That is one thing I wish he had looked for and put on video. I would also like to have seen the bones of a whale and the bones of an elephant.
This guy: "Wow look at this!" ... *refuses to hold camera still for one god damn second*
Okay Lora.
I agree. Terrible camera work. Very interesting idea though.
Agreed. He went to the Richat and didn't film the Richat. Drove me nuts.
Most people with money to do this is going to be about them.
@@asahmosskmf4639 insightful observation
People like you are the actual historians and archaeologists man.
Not really.
Troy and ankor wat where both discovered by real Archaeologists, this dude has never discovered shit.
Well no, the scientists still do the science. But people like the man here are critical to getting the funding and interest to find out the truth.
No. Not at all. This guy is a complete hack and hasn't discovered anything.
You have my deep respect for putting your boots on the ground there! Incredible video.
Has the dude from bright insight seen THIS JIMMY
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick Say that to his million + subscribers lol
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick so do you have sources to counter what bright insight has???
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick so what websites/ people has debunked the ideas that jimmy has presented? I would like to know as i keep an open mind.
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick you catch more flies with honey hunny. maybe if you didn't come off so nasty we would take your "evidence" into consideration with less of the SALTY you added in yourself. have you bothered looking at our evidence or you just spout out your mouth hole thinking you're always right. no one is going to listen to you with that trash attitude so you have options. grow um and treat others how you wanna be treated or keep thinking you're absolutely right and everyone else is wrong. Either way im good, i have enough salt in my life and not enough patience for you.
@fullswing havent really got deep into the alternative ancient history rabit hole of youtube to read on hancocks works so i dont have much of an idea yet. But i think that such channels do have merit in their theories and hypotheses.Nonetheless,we should at least make ground penetrating radar scans of the structure, this would either debunk or prove their theories and hypotheses on Atlantis
I subscribed just because this guy had the balls to travel to the richat... I wish I could have gone with him...
@Ken Penalosa The author of this video spent his own money to venture there... He took a huge risk... having money for paying bribes and moreover protection is paramount... travel cost is the least of your expense...
I'm with Kosh. It's one thing to say this or that, but to go there at tremendous expense and risk is honorable. This is inspiring!
That polished granite.... the rocks built up on the rings then none anywhere else... the waterlines on the mountains nearby...
If i was a billionaire i would spend alot of money just to check this place out
And DIG under the SAHARA and ATTACAMA Deserts!
you probably won´t.
Why am I not surprised that you're not a millionaire?
I would love to go with you! I'm a filmmaker, I adore ancient history and channels like Bright Insights with Jimmy. I've traveled to Peru and would love to be on your team!
Contact him at every level. He needs every help he can get.
And I assume you have no money and he would have to fund you. Get a job bum
Salvador Prado If he has no money how would he have been able to travel to Peru and have film equipment. Stop making people feel like shit because you feel like shit bum.
@@salvadorprado3175 prado means cunt in el Salvador. Did you know ?
Salvador Prado you have made yourself to be sweaty angry dweeb, I’m guessing you settle for the fat chicks at the bar. 👎🏻😂
I came to think of Atlantis being swallowed by the sea as meaning by the sand. A lot of cultures in that area and the middle east consider the desert an ocean of sand or sea of sand. New evidence now points that the whole desert was a tropical paradise of forests and rivers as well.
If you look at that area of Africa from Google Earth, there appears to be some erosion of the land reaching from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic, kind of taking a curve or 2 along the way. Those mountains definitely look water-eroded. I think this site needs more exploration and digging.
I like the fact this place is gaining speed for being Atlantis
It's 99% Atlantis. Anyone with eyes and a brain will realize TOO MANY THINGS ADD UP.......
@@chesterfieldthe3rd929 bingo!
Yooo I’m Mauritanian and this makes me really happy! You’re welcome here !!
rose gal I'm interested if you are still in Mauritania? I'm looking to get some on the ground information before I travel to Nouakchott.
Murray Towers hi! Unfortunately I’m in the UAE :(
@@rosegal8499 Original findings where in 2009, by a German Team : )
Original Material here -> ruclips.net/video/gdalpGZ2OME/видео.html
At the time of Atlantis... Northern Africa was covered with jungle. It was a rainforest. Rivers that flow out to all directions, giant lakes were everywhere and there are carvings of humans with giraffes as if they are riding them.
I want to thank you for your adventure to the Eye of the Sahara. What a trip! I've seen the google earth mapping of that area and the satellite images as well. There are some stone fortifications in the structure that you did not touch on. When is this planned trip back to the Rickat structure?
I
And the desert is continually spreading downward today
Mor MacFey yes more reasonable
@Mor MacFey Nobody said it's not a natural formation, people argue that it was built and lived on
This is actually wrong. In the ice age it was actually even drier than today.
The neolithic subpluvial started thousands of years AFTER Atlantis.
Its insulting to the egyptians and keepers of history to even suggest Atlantis(the atlantic continent) is placed IN AFRICA. WTH.
If this is Atlantis, that means you are standing on the one of the world largest graveyard.
Our planet has lots of graveyards.
It wasnt..and isnt,
Around 1.9 million people died in the battle of Stalingrad, which is almost twice as much as the entrie population of the city of Rome in 100 AD. I doubt Atlantis came even close (if it even existed).
@@bornwithoutprivilege2050 Our planet is a graveyard.
@@hasselnttper3730 Shh, long sk only subscribes to fairy tale history
This was so informative. I was having a hard time understanding what the Richat Structure looked like in-person and this totally explained it.
This is absolutely fascinating. The mountains on approach look water eroded. Not to nitpick, but I wish you had brought a drone to get aerial views. There's definitely something about the eye of the Sahara that warrants further exploration.
Dude foooorrreaal. Somebody needs to fund a large explanation of the Richat with geologists and excavators
Agreed
I'd prefer getting a lydar team over there and see if any foundations are under the sand. I know whale bones and other things have been found. Obvious massive flood by soil and ariel views alone...as well as the vast salts in the structure itself.
@@joshx022 they did LiDAR recently and found a ton of ancient structures
@@ArchaicLens do you have any sources I can read about the findings on?!? Excellent video by the way!
first of all you are nuts for going there, secondly thank you for taking the risk that all of us wanted. I truthfully believe this place is all that remains of Atlantis...
Christopher Acosta if you watch the other videos, its not a risk at all. Unless you are severely unprepared. People of that region are very helpful.
21° 7' 23" N
11° 22' 23" W
Take a look, you might find something interesting. :)
Brian Howe nice!
How is there only one comment on this. That's awesome!
@@lucasfraliex FUCK YOU
I'm not getting anything when searching this at google maps,don't know why.
@@giorgosgan4493 There should be a square structure. With some circular bits at the corners. Looks a bit like the walls of a fort.
You might have to enter in the degree symbol manually. Hold alt and press 0176 and release to get a degree symbol. Also, I edited my original comment to use the symbol now, you should be able to copy and paste it.
I literally just stumbled on your video and I can't believe it was on here for the last 2 years and I never saw it!
I really wish I had found you before you left on this trip! Because I've spent a massive amount of hours combing every inch of this location on Google Earth cataloging my finds that have me 100% convinced this is most definitely Atlantis.
If I had hair I would have been pulling it all out as I just watched you walking around there after having come so close to so many locations that i could have directed you to that I'm also 100% sure would give you the proof you need to confidently say this is most definitely the lost city of Atlantis.
I would have loved to have gone with you, but if I ever find myself not able to go somewhere like this I'll still be happy to offer whatever information I have, especially if it will lead to revealing the finding of Atlantis to the world.
I'm just sick right now knowing I could have sent you directly to some amazing finds! Ugh!...
I'd say more but I really think we should talk in private as soon as possible!
Let me know the best way to contact you and hopefully will talk soon. Meanwhile I'm going to check out your other videos.
Angel*
PS...I'm still beating myself up for not finding this sooner... ugh!... 😔
Respect. Videos on the ground about Eye of Sahara are so freaking rare.
How are there not more people talking about the eye of the Sahara.....? It is such a unique place. Go around and ask people and most of them won't even know it exists.
One more comment. Did you get to talk to any local people about their oral history?
Their "oral" history? You mean go visit some prostitues? You perv.
Your mum ohhh
Mauretanians speak of a great ruler/King, and "coincidentally" went by the name Atlas www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNQ23Ce3knMWDKlzyPh9CDQPM8EJbQ:1574001260576&q=first+king+of+mauritania&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjlyYzQu_HlAhX7ShUIHQBBC8wQ1QIoAHoECAsQAQ&biw=1366&bih=657
svg lrd actuelly the ancient Kingdom is present day morocco not actual Mauritania i think Atlantis is in morocco it fits the map more and berber people have oral history that says the World was once underwater in morocco there is the Atlas mountains
Jeremy Kirkpatrick haha we Berber haves a creation story that is fading due to the fact that 99% of berber are muslim so obviously they dont believe in it anymore dumbass
The two things most Atlantis hunters forget or dismiss are the descriptions of thousands of kilometers of flats and the impassable mud. They are looking for little circular islands under the ocean, which isn't what Plato described. I think the little stones everywhere look suspicious. That place looks like it was pounded hard, really fast, like a Tsunami hit it. I wouldn't completely discount the idea of some megalithic structures, but the biggest stones shown in your video looked like slate, which would have just crumbled under any pressure at all. I think this is the right track, but not what people want to believe was Atlantis. Thanks for this video.
I have a video about Atlantis at my page with additional, new evidence to support the thesis. Feel free to have a look for it. I can't post links, yt simply deletes the post.
Seems reasonable to me for now. I can get on board with this until someone shows me the same kind of evidence you showed here about another location.
Big thanks to Jimmy @BrightInsight for kicking this stuff into overdrive.
"evidence"? What "evidence"? Is this Adam Schiff?
This geographically is impossible..it is off the coast near Spain as the ancient city of Tarsish was. Atlantis has been found already. However there are remarkable cities buried under mud, etc., after the flood of Noah's time in the Bible.
@@jamesstanley7951 now Homer, wasn't it?, wrote that Atlantis destroyed 900 or 9000 years prior to his time. Depending on how you interpret the writing. How would he know? But awhile ago I saw something that said the Mediterranean was a valley not a Sea. With lakes and rivers and fields etc. That known people lived there and traveled there. But I don't know what year that was suppose to be. But if 9000 years ago then people could have traveled to Atlantis by land. Strait of Gibraltar must have been a solid cliff from Spain to Africa, keeping the ocean out of the Mediterranean. Atlantis must have been beyond this cliff.
@@jamesstanley7951
Can you explain how it would be geographically impossible for the Richat Structure to potentially be the site of Atlantis? I'd love to hear your research.
@@aspenrebel it was Plato who had the story passed down his family line from Solon who lived around 600bc.
When the Egyptians told Solon about how Atlantis was destroyed he asked how long ago did this happen and they replied 9,000 years ago. That gives us an actually date of around 11,500 years roughly give or take.
The Egyptians traced their history back many thousands of years in their own hieroglyphs so it's not that far fetched for Solon to believe them.
Edit: we know Solon was a real person who actually existed, very famous law maker I believe.
You can see that the rocks were once carved to have smooth surfaces, but the flood and the weathering just broke them up, and spreed them all over the place 22:11 .
I was seeing that too, being experience hunting for fossils...some of those look sculpted.
I agree I was sitting here thinking that all of those rocks look like brick-shaped stones and tiles just thrown around the place. That would make sense. They had thousands of simple brick houses that would have had the force of a massive wave, similar to a shock wave hit them directly. Think of a blast from a nuclear bomb, we've all seen that video of housing and trees being blown away from the blast like they were nothing. The exact same scenario would have happened here. The water would have carried a lot of the infrastructure away. If I were to go there, I would look underground to see if they had a form of plumbing for water and effluent. If the wave only managed to cut away a metre or two off the top, maybe we could find something underneath. I would also dig in the mud because the water would have taken all the topsoil, including tools, toys and jewellery and dumped it in the channels.
There were a few scenes there where the host completely missed rocks with construction carvings clearly on the outside.
Admire you actually getting out there. This has been my dream ever since watching Jimmy’s channel. BRING DRONES dude! Or bring me and I’ll supply the drones.
You might find a couple mars Rovers in amongst those rocks.
Underrated comment.
Okay this one got me🤣
I thought the same
Looks similar !
I was thinking the same thing.
20:00 is it me or do most of those rocks have very flat faces and nice right angles... almost as if they were used for building walls
I noticed this as well. Some look like they even fit together.
Shale rocks. Made from mud over eons. They flake easily in that way.
or they are flat because they were once lava flows.... because this is clearly a volcanic structure.
@@Ddub1083 I agree that the Richat Structure is an anomaly that is created by volcanic activity below the surface. I am absolutely not a geologist though. I do know what shale looks like, but I am not familiar with every rock type on the planet. That does look just like shale. It seems a bit shiny though? So, maybe lava. The breaking patterns look the way shale looks.
@@Itchypantz I think those are rhyolithic rocks. Though I dont doubt there is lots of shales as well. All the rocks that were on top of the volcanic spot wereexploded and dispersed all around the site and mixed with the volcanic rock that cool later. It wasnt just volcanic below the surface... the ringed structure is from a volcanic dome. It rose up and collapsed in upon itself at least 2 different times. This is what resulted in the various rings. VERY common with volcanic domes.
In fact if you go to the Richat wiki... the very top photo of the site, you can see in the top left of the corner a small distance from Richat is another ringed structure. This was from another separate volcanic event that started with a dome building up and then collapsing. It looks like a target on the ground... just like richat.
"Exposed within the interior of the Richat Structure are a variety of intrusive and extrusive igneous rocks. They include rhyolitic volcanic rocks, gabbros, carbonatites and kimberlites. The rhyolitic rocks consist of lava flows and hydrothermally altered tuffaceous rocks that are part of two distinct eruptive centers, which are interpreted to be the eroded remains of two maars. "
Someone needs to dig down in the middle of the structure to see if they find the two springs of cold and warm water as described by plato.
PhillipOnWater they have and there is
Meta View who did? Can you link a source please? Thanks
@@PhillipOnWater I think Jimmy mentioned it in one of the bright sight insight videos, the folks who did a documentary on it dug out the center to find fresh water, while everywhere else was salt water
J U C H E N that’s not what I’m saying though. There was a hot and cold spring. Is there evidence of both?
@@PhillipOnWater extremely unlikely, I don't see how a hot and cold spring will last 8000+ years
I appreciate you describing it as simple and neolithic, but not megalithic. Have you talked to the locals living at the site? See if they know of any stories passed through oral traditions. Or perhaps they know of structures that were partially standing before their ancestors arrived.
Talking to the desert nomads and the people outside the structure would've been a good idea..
@@ReachingMyPrime not really, they will tell the local islamists where you are and you get kidnapped and beheaded. this is not exaggeration.
The evidence of Atlantis existing there, will be in the small fragmented details. A massive Sea suddenly rushing in the ocean, won't leave much. Keep up the good work. I believe it could definitely have been Atlantis. The overall description of location, matching measurements, and the red, black, and white rock are definite pluses. I also believe that the design of the 'Eye of Egypt' is basically a map of Atlantis.
next time bring a drone... would give good perspective on size and where youre standing etc... very interesting... probably a lot of stuff under the Atlantic
a young white man flying a drone in the middle of nowhere in a developing country is very ill advised without local/official permission.
@@janoel03 of course I would agree.. so ... get permission... I'm sure they would understand what your doing
@@mikesuniverse1789 And that is what I am saying... having worked in west Africa obtaining drone permits I am telling you - a hobbyist will not get one. It will take months or more to even find the person who believes they have the authority to make that decision and even if you find someone who might be willing the chances of being extorted and possibly having permission rescinded immediately is high. I am just warning folks that might take your suggestion seriously- be sure you have all documents in order because it is not a safe idea to bring this type of equipment to a remote location in a country you do not know on your own.
@@janoel03 I see your point... plan B: helium balloons and an iPhone camera.... and really long string
Diallo Khari I can get behind that ingenuity. 😂
The real life Milo from “Atlantis”
yes, but disney atlantis is isoteric manbo jambo , that was sold to people by fake mediums , to rich people in the 1920's !
When you think of the lost cities found under the desert of Iraq it's not hard to think of something 5000 years older being completely covered.
The exact same structure is a bit of a stretch but the possible continuity of using 3 colors for masonry seems very plausible and somewhat evident in the town's architecture. Interesting video!
The quality of the stonework around 7:00 is startling: the sharp corners and the flat, perfectly plumb walls. Somebody there is a master of the craft.
Imagine a child did this as a hobby because the desert is so damn boring.
You're a legend. Humanity thanks you for your efforts.
So say we all.
He really is, real life Nathan drake
I was sold on the Richat being Atlantis before watching this. The Herodotus map points almost right to it! Watching this just confirms things. A huge excavation needs to take place. At least some ground penetrating analysis. Great work on the video. Very informative.
I think you're right
Great respect for heading out there by yourself, we should start crowdfunding with Jimmy, you, and lots of enthusiasts and find the proof it takes to acquire real investments for the site excavation.
At 20:00 you can see a rock that appears to have stone work similar to the nearby town!
Would have been nice to see what your looking at instead of your head blocking the view
Narcissism...
Lucas Pollet accident
The map of solon, from my own findings and other RUclipsrs we all came to the same conclusion eye of Sahara otherwise known as Rachet of Sahara is atlantis..
And it matches with descriptions of plato mountains of north and all.. i have a theory on how its made but i am not good at making videos :/ maybe a book
isnt that the map of herodotus?
The problem with modernday archaelogists is that they film everything with their face infront of it. Its the "all about me" generation.
They have there head an hands an feet in the dirt
@@jerrygibson6995 No Jerry, they have their heads infront of the camera Jerry. I didn't accuse him of having his head in the sand Jerry, thats on you. Head/camera.
Don't cut yourself short, this was a very good informative video! Thank you for taking the time to publish it!
no it wasnt.
Amazing that you managed to go there. You are brave man! Stay safe please. Did you bring a drone?
No drone this time around but on my next visit I will attempt to bring one.
did he even bring a shovel?
If a giant, country-sized, tsunami had washed over the city from the south-west (as the visible structures show on google earth), then any remnants of human construction would have been washed away from the location toward the BASE of the mountains to the north and north-east. I suspect that any excavation/GPR would most profitably be conducted at those locations. Basically, though it's hard to comprehend the dynamics of a wave that size, there's probably a terminal moraine of debris at some point inland. Mountainous outcrops like those to the north should capture some of the heavier debris of the city even if they didn't block the wave (which clearly they didn't).
cant you see a debris everywhere he is walking
@@xxtoxii9615
I was thinking more of the debris of obvious HUMAN MANUFACTURE, like carved stone, pot shards etc, not random weathered rocks. If he'd found one credible example of "worked" rock in the several days there, he'd have shown it. (the closest he came was obviously ablated sedimentary rock layers)
@@poneill65 didnt you see the artifacts found? 22:50
@@xxtoxii9615
Sigh, yes, for I have eyes to see!
ALL I WAS SUGGESTING was that, all things being equal, any systematic future search might better be directed where more artifacts might have been deposited as the actual site was very clearly lacking any significant items
@@poneill65 bunch of talk for simple proposition of archeological digging .what do you think that rocks would go how far if a tsunami hit? they would just roll a bit in the direction wave hit and much less when water started to retreat. and by the amount of that rubble it seams something is there and if u watched the video you would see a much bigger rocks being piled on a small hill. and artifacts being there also a shell is very significant dont you think.
13:00 Also, Atlantis would’ve sunk with the Younger Dryas event. So that would be farther from the Sumerian Empire than the Sumerian Empire is to us. We had to dig to find Sumer, it wasn’t on the very top. We may have to dig to find Atlantis, if any remains.
Ofc, maybe not, as the tops of the rings are still plateaus. Maybe those rocks around are all that remains. However, like I said, you almost never find ancient ruins on the surface. And those ruins are all closer to today than Atlantis was to the ruined cities.
Anyone else upset that dealers are pilfering artifacts from the site and possibly losing in invaluable clues to the past
Alexander Howard they’ve been doing that since Plato
What would you be doing if you were there?
There is ancient artifacts (such as walls under ground) here is USA and no one cares that cites such as Rockwall near Austin are being built over them. No one stops u from digging in ur back yard.
Well it's their ancient rock so they can do whatever they want with it
The next time you go there, you must go with Jimmy. It would be a wonderful video with you two guys. Congrats!
The Original Archaeologists, it was not Jimmy !
A Team of German Archaeologist's actually re-discover Atlantis in 2008 and released a documentary
called Visiting Atlantis in 2010 !
@@serenemountain6769 I never said that the original archeologist were Jimmy. I just said that they would make a great team together. 😄
Thanks for the video, I've found myself thinking this could be the main city of Atlantis. Looking over the Richat, I found a funny looking structure at this location for which there is no description. If you end up going down there again, it could be worth your while looking around it. 21°07'13.25" N 11°16'35.60" W
Fascinating footage! I'm struck by how closely the landscape resembles a massive debris field.
Resembles?
It IS" a massive debris field...