Having a foreskin is better than not, because that skin covers the glans all the time and prevents it from desensitization due to constant contact with clothing. Uncut glans are very smooth and very sensitive. The glans of cut men are rough and less sensitive. Plus, it works better with the foreskin, needs less lubricant (if any at all) and of course, that's the way it's made, for good reason. Cutting it off for anything other than religious observance or anatomical necessity, is ridiculous. The US needs to stop doing it automatically.
The flipside is that uncircumcised guys are too sensitive and do not last long. I am circumcised and I love it! I read about old men who are uncircumcised and cleaning their penises is a lot of work. And girls like circumcised penises.
Yet another thing the US unknowingly gets uniquely wrong. If you want to compare the vast difference in sensitivity try rubbing the outside and inside of your lower lip.
False. I live in Toronto and many guys here are circumcised. Not because of religion. Circumcision is common in Iran, Bangladesh and many places. If I have a son ✂️ ✂️✂️
Also, I met a woman from Portugal. She hooked up with intact men in Europe and circumcised men in Toronto. She said she prefers circumcised penises, because they are cleaner. She said that if she has a son, she will have him circumcised.
Yes, of course it's common in Islamic countries. But the US is unique because it is done for non-religious reasons. By the way. you and your friends are in the minority because the Canadian rate is only 30% and thankfully falling rapidly every decade. Your son will be one of the last boys to get mutilated unless he reverts to Islam or Judaism.@@scottwood928
Having a foreskin is better than not, because that skin covers the glans all the time and prevents it from desensitization due to constant contact with clothing. Uncut glans are very smooth and very sensitive. The glans of cut men are rough and less sensitive. Plus, it works better with the foreskin, needs less lubricant (if any at all) and of course, that's the way it's made, for good reason. Cutting it off for anything other than religious observance or anatomical necessity, is ridiculous. The US needs to stop doing it automatically.
The flipside is that uncircumcised guys are too sensitive and do not last long. I am circumcised and I love it! I read about old men who are uncircumcised and cleaning their penises is a lot of work. And girls like circumcised penises.
In Latin America is rare to be circumcised 😂😂
Please come to the comedy club at City Steam Brewery in Hartford Connecticut!
Yet another thing the US unknowingly gets uniquely wrong. If you want to compare the vast difference in sensitivity try rubbing the outside and inside of your lower lip.
False. I live in Toronto and many guys here are circumcised. Not because of religion. Circumcision is common in Iran, Bangladesh and many places. If I have a son ✂️ ✂️✂️
Also, I met a woman from Portugal. She hooked up with intact men in Europe and circumcised men in Toronto. She said she prefers circumcised penises, because they are cleaner. She said that if she has a son, she will have him circumcised.
Yes, of course it's common in Islamic countries. But the US is unique because it is done for non-religious reasons. By the way. you and your friends are in the minority because the Canadian rate is only 30% and thankfully falling rapidly every decade. Your son will be one of the last boys to get mutilated unless he reverts to Islam or Judaism.@@scottwood928
Iran and Bangladesh are muslim countries. @@scottwood928