Just bought one of these as a starter bike and I actually like it. It's a 2006 and has decent power. I've watched a video before about how the 883 is like a girls bike. Not sure what that's all about. But who cares. I like it.
Anyone who complains that a Sportster is "not fast" is riding the wrong motorcycle. Sportsters are not fast - they're not supposed to be fast. But it's got an 883cc engine, so it's torquey and "fast enough." You really have to rev 'em up to get performance out of them. And even then, you won't be racing any Hayabusas. I've owned four Sportsters - still have two of them (currently an 883 and a 1200), and I can count on one hand the number of times I've *had* to use full throttle on either of them. People often ask me about the performance difference between them. I just shrug - I don't know. I don't drag race them. To me, they both seem the same, because I don't ride them like an idiot. Good things? Sportster have: self-canceling turn signals; rev-limiters, "tip-over" switches that kill the engine if the bike goes down. And that engine is absolutely friggin' bulletproof. An 883 will return up to 60 mpg if you can resist blipping the throttle like a moron at every stoplight. Bad things? They are small and light - not really a good two-up motorcycle. We Americans seem to think "bigger is better" when it comes to motorcycles. The Sportster seems like a middleweight these days. Another bad thing: Harley dealer salespeople will look down on you and ask, "When are you gonna get a real motorcycle?" They think they're being cute in using that tactic to try and sell you a Big Twin but they're just being condescending. Is the Sportster a perfect bike? Heck no. But as this video demonstrated, they are great bikes...fun and dependable...good "all-around" motorcycles.
Just bought one of these as a starter bike and I actually like it. It's a 2006 and has decent power. I've watched a video before about how the 883 is like a girls bike. Not sure what that's all about. But who cares. I like it.
Thank you for the great ride, Cycle Fever
Anyone who complains that a Sportster is "not fast" is riding the wrong motorcycle. Sportsters are not fast - they're not supposed to be fast. But it's got an 883cc engine, so it's torquey and "fast enough." You really have to rev 'em up to get performance out of them. And even then, you won't be racing any Hayabusas. I've owned four Sportsters - still have two of them (currently an 883 and a 1200), and I can count on one hand the number of times I've *had* to use full throttle on either of them. People often ask me about the performance difference between them. I just shrug - I don't know. I don't drag race them. To me, they both seem the same, because I don't ride them like an idiot. Good things? Sportster have: self-canceling turn signals; rev-limiters, "tip-over" switches that kill the engine if the bike goes down. And that engine is absolutely friggin' bulletproof. An 883 will return up to 60 mpg if you can resist blipping the throttle like a moron at every stoplight. Bad things? They are small and light - not really a good two-up motorcycle. We Americans seem to think "bigger is better" when it comes to motorcycles. The Sportster seems like a middleweight these days. Another bad thing: Harley dealer salespeople will look down on you and ask, "When are you gonna get a real motorcycle?" They think they're being cute in using that tactic to try and sell you a Big Twin but they're just being condescending. Is the Sportster a perfect bike? Heck no. But as this video demonstrated, they are great bikes...fun and dependable...good "all-around" motorcycles.
Thanks for the insight! Well said. We agree, the Sportster can definitely be enough bike for many riders.
last year of the carbeurator was 2006. After that it was FI & computers up your ass like Google with an Android user.
I’m looking at a 1993 Harley sportster 883 deluxe would 5k cost be worth it, don’t have a speedometer tho lol
So fun
I am new to the bike world.. do you recommend a Sportster 883 for me? I would love for it to be my first bike.
It’s a good bike , nice bike
@@rolfhansen3427 I am leaning towards getting a 1200. Thoughts?
@@montymoss37 1200 will be equally good. Just a bit more power that's it essentially