Not gonna lie, describing people based on their body language sounds a ton like astrology or palm reading. Oh, from looking at you I can see you are open to new experiences, enjoy friends, low on risk tolerance...
I’ve no doubt that there are clues to be gleaned from body language, it’s put in focus on police interrogations and people can obviously discern things in social encounters...but what I do doubt is that systemized archetypes are a real value and not just a way to label for convenience.
You don’t know anything about either subject. Most people that have demeaning comments about the subjects tend to know nothing about them or the theory behind why they may work. Astrology is something I’ve studied for 24 years and my father 30 years. You are looking at bio electrical fields interacting with the greater magnetosphere within the solar sphere. EM fields within fiends are imported by the greater fields and charged bodies (planets) moving through those fields shift configurations.
That’s because it is. There’s a reason things like polygraphs are inadmissible in court, because reading bodily functions to make overarching assumptions about people is 1000% bullshit
Grad student in therapy and geopolitics nerd here, this was an interesting talk. I think there is much practical merit to the analysis and promotion of archetypes-especially with how much our generation identifies with artistic media and characters-as well as the “crisis of ineptitude” and misery you discuss due to the mismatch of people and the things that would bring them meaning. I wonder how one could reconcile the Jungian archetypes, which have some universality but are still based in Western tradition, and the East and South Asian schools of thought you mention (with reference to Amaury de Riencourt). Archetypes can be limiting and personality/meaning-derivation is so fluid throughout life that striving to wholly embody your archetype (realize the Übermensch, etc.) would leave many people in a sort of existential limbo.
Hi Jung considered the archetypes to be our biological instincts for certain behaviour and capability’s. Our instincts in humans are weak but still there. He identified four major archetype’s and you activate them sequentially as you grow. You have four childish forms and most children access them fully. The multitude the expert described are speaalisms in the basic four. Now adults fail to activate all four adult forms and any specialisations. Here is an example your instinct is to be good at phisical activity eg walk run jump throw a spear shoot an arrow play group games and wrestling. Archetype is called the warrior in adults. Study’s show adults bad at physical activity suffer bad health and bad mental health. Make them do physical activity and you can reverse lots af illness and reverse some mental illnesses. Infact people report feeling emotional good and happier. There bodies activate genes and make new parts in the cells. It is possible you have stronger emotions and instincts between the four. Jung said you need to activate all four adult archetypes to be successful in life and not have serious problems. I get the impression that you can specialise later and get respect for that. I don’t know egniugh about eastern ideas and traditions to comment. Do you consider Jung and archetypes in therapy? Are you using the classical schools? Freud rogers Franca’s of thought in your work life? Or the modern behaviourist or positive psychology of Selgram?
This explains why I like Rudyards content alot and how he thinks. Im an ENTP and we like interacting with INTJs alot and easily make friends with them since they are one of the highest compatibilities with us
Imagine a main battle tank with the archetypes of the warrior trying to be the best winner survivor and take home the prize. Having an instinct for land leadership and power. Be carful what you wish for. Lots of kings were warriors first and paid priest and schoolers to think deaply. But most warriors were happy. So a happy Tank ruling a town could be interesting 😊.
Alright, folks, let's delve into the realm of interracial dating, specifically when it comes to dating someone of a different race, and trust me, there are some crucial conversations to be had. Buckle up because we're about to explore the complexities of diverse relationships, and it's a topic that requires sensitivity and understanding! First off, dating someone of a different race is like saying, "Hey, let's embrace diversity and celebrate love across racial boundaries." It's like embarking on a journey with someone who may have a different cultural background, but here's the catch - interracial relationships can come with their own set of challenges and nuances. And don't even get me started on the potential consequences! Sure, love transcends race, but it's vital to acknowledge that our society isn't always as open-minded as it should be. It's like wading through uncharted waters - you might encounter stereotypes, biases, or even cultural misunderstandings that require patience and open communication to navigate. Now, the emotional aftermath of dating someone of a different race? Oh boy, that's like treading carefully in a minefield of societal expectations and personal experiences. You'll be dealing with the emotional complexities of bridging cultural gaps, addressing potential family or societal reactions, and ensuring that both partners feel respected and understood. It's like building a bridge between two worlds - it can be a rewarding journey, but it requires effort and empathy. In conclusion, while interracial relationships can be incredibly enriching and meaningful, they come with their unique set of challenges. It's like embarking on a journey where you'll discover new perspectives, but you must also be prepared to address potential obstacles along the way. So, before you dive into a relationship with someone of a different race, approach it with an open heart, educate yourself about their culture, and be prepared to face the world together as a united front. Thanks for tuning in, and as always, celebrate love in all its forms!
Intelligence isn't really multivariate. It's one, single resource, but when it's very high it starts to specialise because their is more stuff to disperse across different areas of intelligence. That's why geniuses tend to be geniuses in a particular thing, and not so much in other things.
Looking too much into Jung’s archetypes have the same hazards as astrology. It often influences people to reductionism, oversimplification of personalities and stereotyping of the self and others. It has its benefits but I think the problems outweigh them.
This is an interesting concept. Personality must have a biological component. Anyone who has ever had children or been around them understands that people are born with a predilection for seeing the world in a certain way. My theory is that it's varying capabilities to produce or reuptake the 3 main neuro chemicals within each of our brains that give us our baseline and then all of our future experiences are shaped by this default world view.
Yea it’s strange that you only scored 110 in IQ. I’m a connoisseur of the mind, find peoples thinking processes interesting and in their variability. I scored very high in IQ but don’t feel that’s the greatest strength I have intellectually but rather openness, inventiveness and the ability to think of the abstract in a very concrete sensory way, shifting and changing as well as combining ideas across a very broad canvass of ideas. You are one of the most intelligent RUclipsrs by far, the way you tackle issues and think about them is admirable and honestly I just don’t generally respect peoples mental processing capabilities much, as they are generally pretty mundane. Intelligence and what it means should be redefined.
IQ does not indicate intelligence nor does intelligence need to be redefined. The relation between IQ and intelligence is questionable and ongoing. If you are really “a connoisseur of the mind” put forth the time and effort to do research before making false correlations then praising an ignorant pseudo-intellectual.
there is a corrolation between IQ and intelligence, that goes without saying, plenty to back that up. I agree there is much more to intelligence though that goes beyond this corrolation. And honestly, if you are going to be all snotty about it go bug someone else. @@TuveanYGloir
This is an incoherent explanation. Yes people change their behaviours under stresses and pressures, but these changes aren't different archetypes thrown together, they're predictable based on the core type. We know from the type what will change based on external pressure and what will not. Otherwise, it leaves wide open the question of why do people have certain combinations of archetypes and not others. Can't just smoosh opposites together. They need to share something that justifies them being a dialectic within the person.
No they clearly don't, they are just people who don't have the skill level to study psychology, anthropology or sociology etc. So they just make up their cosmology based on books from a century ago
Also, it’s being told by a Intuitive Feeler, which generally struggles with being pragmatic over being cooperative. (No I’m not particularly good at typing people, because I have Extroverted Feeling Trickster meaning I’m socially clueless, and I don’t have the time to learn to develop that neglected function.)
Dude, stop showing your chest hair and slouching and clean off your camera lens. How can I take these topics seriously when you don’t seem to take your presentation of them seriously? (Btw I watch all of your videos on your main channel and really like them, idk this just hit me weird)
Imagine trusting someone else's brain about other people's brains. I may be retarded, but i know me some shit.... Miss me with the space-racism adjacent people theories.
@@quadrasaurus-rex8809 I'd argue to the contrary but I'm also a descriptivist and that would violate my own values about language. I did express myself precisely. Wether or not everyone reading it will see what I see... up to debate. Tldr, thanks, that's a single word I struggle to use.
@@EchoLoguse less big words and you will sound less like someone trying too hard to sound smart. Be concise with your language or you will just end up as another dime a dozen pseudo intellectual
This definitely needs a primer video. If you're not already familiar with Jungian theory, this just sounds like gobbledygook.
Not gonna lie, describing people based on their body language sounds a ton like astrology or palm reading. Oh, from looking at you I can see you are open to new experiences, enjoy friends, low on risk tolerance...
A lot of it is misplaced faith and the human need to want to believe in something
That’s because it is
I’ve no doubt that there are clues to be gleaned from body language, it’s put in focus on police interrogations and people can obviously discern things in social encounters...but what I do doubt is that systemized archetypes are a real value and not just a way to label for convenience.
You don’t know anything about either subject. Most people that have demeaning comments about the subjects tend to know nothing about them or the theory behind why they may work. Astrology is something I’ve studied for 24 years and my father 30 years. You are looking at bio electrical fields interacting with the greater magnetosphere within the solar sphere. EM fields within fiends are imported by the greater fields and charged bodies (planets) moving through those fields shift configurations.
That’s because it is. There’s a reason things like polygraphs are inadmissible in court, because reading bodily functions to make overarching assumptions about people is 1000% bullshit
Grad student in therapy and geopolitics nerd here, this was an interesting talk. I think there is much practical merit to the analysis and promotion of archetypes-especially with how much our generation identifies with artistic media and characters-as well as the “crisis of ineptitude” and misery you discuss due to the mismatch of people and the things that would bring them meaning.
I wonder how one could reconcile the Jungian archetypes, which have some universality but are still based in Western tradition, and the East and South Asian schools of thought you mention (with reference to Amaury de Riencourt). Archetypes can be limiting and personality/meaning-derivation is so fluid throughout life that striving to wholly embody your archetype (realize the Übermensch, etc.) would leave many people in a sort of existential limbo.
Hi Jung considered the archetypes to be our biological instincts for certain behaviour and capability’s. Our instincts in humans are weak but still there. He identified four major archetype’s and you activate them sequentially as you grow. You have four childish forms and most children access them fully. The multitude the expert described are speaalisms in the basic four. Now adults fail to activate all four adult forms and any specialisations. Here is an example your instinct is to be good at phisical activity eg walk run jump throw a spear shoot an arrow play group games and wrestling. Archetype is called the warrior in adults. Study’s show adults bad at physical activity suffer bad health and bad mental health. Make them do physical activity and you can reverse lots af illness and reverse some mental illnesses. Infact people report feeling emotional good and happier. There bodies activate genes and make new parts in the cells. It is possible you have stronger emotions and instincts between the four. Jung said you need to activate all four adult archetypes to be successful in life and not have serious problems. I get the impression that you can specialise later and get respect for that.
I don’t know egniugh about eastern ideas and traditions to comment.
Do you consider Jung and archetypes in therapy? Are you using the classical schools? Freud rogers Franca’s of thought in your work life? Or the modern behaviourist or positive psychology of Selgram?
Personality tests are great for stroking the ego, lol
Jungian psychology is simply a mystery religion for the masses.
Imagine reading non-peer reviewed psychology from a hundred years ago instead of contemporary psychological research.
Jung is my favorite schizoposter
I think it's more akin to Astrology for young men.
fellow INTJ
This explains why I like Rudyards content alot and how he thinks. Im an ENTP and we like interacting with INTJs alot and easily make friends with them since they are one of the highest compatibilities with us
Really interesting stuff i must say
You should have edward dutton on the pod.
Jungian archetypes are an excellent source of material for developing AI to have more depth
Please god not like this.
Imagine a main battle tank with the archetypes of the warrior trying to be the best winner survivor and take home the prize. Having an instinct for land leadership and power. Be carful what you wish for. Lots of kings were warriors first and paid priest and schoolers to think deaply. But most warriors were happy. So a happy Tank ruling a town could be interesting 😊.
A vid on Europe with Kraut would be great
Alright, folks, let's delve into the realm of interracial dating, specifically when it comes to dating someone of a different race, and trust me, there are some crucial conversations to be had. Buckle up because we're about to explore the complexities of diverse relationships, and it's a topic that requires sensitivity and understanding!
First off, dating someone of a different race is like saying, "Hey, let's embrace diversity and celebrate love across racial boundaries." It's like embarking on a journey with someone who may have a different cultural background, but here's the catch - interracial relationships can come with their own set of challenges and nuances.
And don't even get me started on the potential consequences! Sure, love transcends race, but it's vital to acknowledge that our society isn't always as open-minded as it should be. It's like wading through uncharted waters - you might encounter stereotypes, biases, or even cultural misunderstandings that require patience and open communication to navigate.
Now, the emotional aftermath of dating someone of a different race? Oh boy, that's like treading carefully in a minefield of societal expectations and personal experiences. You'll be dealing with the emotional complexities of bridging cultural gaps, addressing potential family or societal reactions, and ensuring that both partners feel respected and understood. It's like building a bridge between two worlds - it can be a rewarding journey, but it requires effort and empathy.
In conclusion, while interracial relationships can be incredibly enriching and meaningful, they come with their unique set of challenges. It's like embarking on a journey where you'll discover new perspectives, but you must also be prepared to address potential obstacles along the way. So, before you dive into a relationship with someone of a different race, approach it with an open heart, educate yourself about their culture, and be prepared to face the world together as a united front. Thanks for tuning in, and as always, celebrate love in all its forms!
What kind of stuff did you get up to in Mexico?
Someone asking the real questions 😆 this made me laugh out loud. Favourite comment.
Intelligence isn't really multivariate. It's one, single resource, but when it's very high it starts to specialise because their is more stuff to disperse across different areas of intelligence. That's why geniuses tend to be geniuses in a particular thing, and not so much in other things.
@JollyHeretic you should have him. Edward Dutton How to judge people on how they look, based scientist.
Looking too much into Jung’s archetypes have the same hazards as astrology. It often influences people to reductionism, oversimplification of personalities and stereotyping of the self and others. It has its benefits but I think the problems outweigh them.
This is an interesting concept. Personality must have a biological component. Anyone who has ever had children or been around them understands that people are born with a predilection for seeing the world in a certain way.
My theory is that it's varying capabilities to produce or reuptake the 3 main neuro chemicals within each of our brains that give us our baseline and then all of our future experiences are shaped by this default world view.
What happened to the personality test website? (was my comment deleted?)
Thank you from rockford illinois.
Yea it’s strange that you only scored 110 in IQ. I’m a connoisseur of the mind, find peoples thinking processes interesting and in their variability. I scored very high in IQ but don’t feel that’s the greatest strength I have intellectually but rather openness, inventiveness and the ability to think of the abstract in a very concrete sensory way, shifting and changing as well as combining ideas across a very broad canvass of ideas. You are one of the most intelligent RUclipsrs by far, the way you tackle issues and think about them is admirable and honestly I just don’t generally respect peoples mental processing capabilities much, as they are generally pretty mundane. Intelligence and what it means should be redefined.
IQ does not indicate intelligence nor does intelligence need to be redefined. The relation between IQ and intelligence is questionable and ongoing. If you are really “a connoisseur of the mind” put forth the time and effort to do research before making false correlations then praising an ignorant pseudo-intellectual.
there is a corrolation between IQ and intelligence, that goes without saying, plenty to back that up. I agree there is much more to intelligence though that goes beyond this corrolation. And honestly, if you are going to be all snotty about it go bug someone else. @@TuveanYGloir
Genuine question , what is a professional adventure??
Very cool listening
I only recently heard of Dan. How can we find his work?
He posts a lot on twitter also I found some articles by searching DeepReadDan on google
This is an incoherent explanation. Yes people change their behaviours under stresses and pressures, but these changes aren't different archetypes thrown together, they're predictable based on the core type. We know from the type what will change based on external pressure and what will not. Otherwise, it leaves wide open the question of why do people have certain combinations of archetypes and not others. Can't just smoosh opposites together. They need to share something that justifies them being a dialectic within the person.
what happened to this podcast is almost been 3 months
I'm smart but make silly mistakes
Why is his Twitter gone?
He's back
Daniel you need a better microphone!!!
I bet he doesn't know Socionics. That's the most advanced Jungian typology and way more insightful than Myers Briggs.
11:40 i would never dare to reveal my IQ score
This ending was such an autizm
His X account is gone and his websites test doesn’t lead to a domain that exist. Scammer?
Do they have peer review studys to prove this mambo jumbo?
No they clearly don't, they are just people who don't have the skill level to study psychology, anthropology or sociology etc. So they just make up their cosmology based on books from a century ago
@@Armorius2199
Which studies do you need??
It's largely a priori in nature, simplistic classification of individuals based of outlines the the vast majority of individuals fall into.
Also, it’s being told by a Intuitive Feeler, which generally struggles with being pragmatic over being cooperative. (No I’m not particularly good at typing people, because I have Extroverted Feeling Trickster meaning I’m socially clueless, and I don’t have the time to learn to develop that neglected function.)
@@JC-pi9em all of them
Dan's Twitter handle is non existent.
Horoscopes for pseuds
Dude, stop showing your chest hair and slouching and clean off your camera lens.
How can I take these topics seriously when you don’t seem to take your presentation of them seriously? (Btw I watch all of your videos on your main channel and really like them, idk this just hit me weird)
Hi Dan!
Eduardo Bolivian cat don't approve
*Promo sm*
M
Imagine trusting someone else's brain about other people's brains.
I may be retarded, but i know me some shit....
Miss me with the space-racism adjacent people theories.
Well put
@@quadrasaurus-rex8809 I'd argue to the contrary but I'm also a descriptivist and that would violate my own values about language.
I did express myself precisely. Wether or not everyone reading it will see what I see... up to debate.
Tldr, thanks, that's a single word I struggle to use.
@@EchoLoguse less big words and you will sound less like someone trying too hard to sound smart. Be concise with your language or you will just end up as another dime a dozen pseudo intellectual