It was literally just the first round. First round games are generally the easiest round in every sport. Im glad we have an actual playoff system like every other sport.
It’s not about “just the first round.” These games are still supposed to be meaningful, and when teams get demolished, it exposes that the playoff structure is allowing weaker teams to slip through. A real playoff system should produce competitive games in every round, including the first.
@@noredoosno2929 There is literally no way to predict (and by extension, prevent) blowouts. Games that are hosting two teams of similar talent and coaching (FSU vs. Clemson in 2013, Clemson vs. Alabama in 2018) still sometimes result in blowouts. You cannot make a system that eliminates that possibility.
It’s not the first year though that’s the issue. it’s the inherent flaws in how the system is designed. We shouldn’t just sit back and say, “It’ll get better next year” as if that’s a valid response to a system that doesn’t even get the fundamentals right.
@@noredoosno2929I think ultimately it's good. The judges can still vote on the teams they think are best for viewership while the players and coaches determine their fates. There will be schools every year that argue it should be them but now it's like a 1/12 chance of making the playoffs instead 1/33. It's better for everyone.
The average margin of victory during the 4 team playoff era was 18.6 points. The average margin of victory for this first round of the 12 team format was 19.3. Not exactly an earth-shattering difference, everyone calm down.
People are forgetting that the lower rank teams had to go into the higher rank teams home-field. I think the first round is always gonna be mostly blowouts and I think that’s fair.
I think seeding is more the issue. Conference champions should get an auto-bid but i dont agree with the bye. In the basketball tournament the #1 seeds are still the top ranked teams and upsets are ranked lower. If seeding was.. 1. Oregon 2. UGA 3. Texas 4. Notre Dame Then youd get these games 5. Ohio State vs 12. Clemson 6. Penn State vs 11. AZ State 7. Tennessee vs 10. SMU 8. Indiana vs 9. Boise State
No. It will take time for programs to get recruiting bumps for appearing in the playoffs. Blowouts really don't matter as long as high school kids believe they can realistically make it to the playoffs in your program. Teams like Indiana and SMU can be much more competitive in a few years simply because of the clout making the playoffs will have for high-school kids and experienced transfers.
The playoffs aren’t even over yet, it’s too early to say if it’s a disaster yet. We have only played like 1/3 of the games in the playoff. The lower seeds went ON THE ROAD and lost to the home teams that were favored. There is still plenty of football left to play and I feel like people are overreacting WAY too much and saying that it’s a failure too early.
I don't understand this talking point about teams "not deserving" to be there because they don't have a chance to go all the way and they get handled easily. This is the case in LITERALLY every other sport. When is the last time an 8 seed did anything in the nba playoffs? A wildcard team winning the Superbowl? Relax, you hyperbolic whiners. This format eliminates the teams stating that if they would have gotten in then they would have won. If a few games aren't competitive, so be it. It comes with the territory
Its the best decision they ever made. Finally you actually get to see the best team. I now watch alot more college football since they did this. Its great!
The seeding is the main issue. Rather than guarantee a first week BYE it should only guarantee a spot in the 12 team playoff. I still would've preferred it to be just at 8 so that none of these 3 loss teams can bitch about not getting in but oh well
People forget cfp games tend to be blowouts regardless, wouldn’t what determines whether it’s good or not is if teams under the 4 seed end up in the final or win it all?
No. Nothing is perfect, especially when talking NCAA football champion systems. More MEANINGFUL football is always fun. cinderella's will come, we're working with a VERY limited sample size. But good on you for initiating the discussion.
We have 6 new years bowl games and then the national championship. It always made sense to go to 8 teams. The new years 6 bowl games would consume the quarter and semi finals, and the national championship game would be a week later than usual. There has never been a year where 12 teams were in a league of their own. It's always been 3-7 teams that are above and beyond the rest.
SMU never beat a top 25 opponent yet they were supposed to compete with Penn state? You all are tripping, if you actually believed that would be a competitive game.
Take these games to neural sites and the scores and possibly the outcome will be different. College basketball doesn’t seed teams based on rankings so Football doesn’t need to also
Shit happens in the FCS all the time nobody bitches and complains about “ to many teams” only at the top level this shit is a problem when it shouldn’t be literally just adopt the FCS playoffs blowouts will happen regardless
It’s not getting smaller if any change will happen it will probably mean more teams and games. More games means more of an inventory for CF to sell to espn and others
Could be the moons aligned this year and produced the lopsided results? Although good teams made the playoff in their own right - the powerhouses are the powerhouses - like 16 vs. 1 in the 1st round of March Madness. 😂
No, but put the best 12 teams next time. Otherwise you will just get a bunch of good teams and a handful of teams that avoid tough OOC or got lucky avoiding the top teams in their conference.
Alabama driders are the worst to ever live. Literally whining over a 3 loss team when no other 3 loss team is getting the same amount of bias if you want to play in the big games win the small ones
@@Keyshawn-i5g Buddy, im sorry Alabama didn't come hyped to play in the ReliaQuest Bowl. My buddies and I predicted us to lose because the team dont care. At Alabama we play for nattys, we don't give a shit about these bowl games lmfao
8 Team Playoffs You Requesting That's Lame Because The Middle Of The Road School Can't Make It In That's Lame I Strongly Disagree With your Requesting For That
as a bama fan we should have never had the chance to make the playoffs. we had a first year headcoach and it rlly showed with the inconsistency. most of us just saw the fact that smu had a cupcake schedule and thought since on paper we were the most deserving 9-3 team we should have gotten in but losing 2 horrible games is just not rlly acceptable
I said the same thing when they first started talking about expansion. I was surprised when they went with 12 out of the gate. My thinking was 8 than maybe 12 down the road.
It should be top 12 teams in the rankings No Auto-Bids for conference champions B/c if the schedule you play is what you play and your conference is bad and your record is what you say you are… Then you should not get in
The 12-team format provides an opportunity for more upsets. Maybe a team with a less impressive resume upsets a more reputable one, which makes the competition more interesting. The excitement of college football lies in the chance for the "other guys" to dismantle top-tier teams. I don't know about you, but I don’t want to watch the same 3 or 4 teams consistently win the championship. That’s not exciting at all.
It's not all the bracket's fault why we're seeing the Oregon-Ohio St match-up so early. The biggest reason why we're seeing the "Championship game" this early is because Ohio St lost to Michigan as a 19.5-point favorite. If OSU had won that game, and made it to the BIG10 Championship, no matter who would've won in the BIG10 championship game, the loser would fall no further then #7 (after byes are accounted for) and the winner would be ranked #1, which the bracket would've guaranteed that this match-up would've happened in the semi-finals or the Championship game. We have to put more responsibility on OSU.
Now the college football committee did get it right. They did put the right teams in. It's just that games didn't go as planned in the first round. Who knows maybe in the future in the first round we might get tighter closer matchups
Yes it's terrible. What are the these terrible takes from u guys in the comments section. U guys do understand what automatic bid means and why they went to the 12 team playoff? So smaller schools get a chance. It also means that teams from conference usa, sun belt, american, mw, and the new pac 12 will get an automatic bye if they win out. They will only consider changing it when the 14 team playoff gets here. I don't understand these brain dead comments. The most deserving teams will always get in over the better team in this format. They signed a contract for this until 2026 maybe they tweak it when the 14 team playoff gets here. Until then enjoy more blowouts and meaningless football 😂😂.
No. Playoffs of ALL TYPES tend to have blowouts in the first round. Aka, this is NORMAL!!! But just like March Madness or the NFL playoffs we WILL eventually get Cinderella Stories that simply wouldn't have been possible with the 4-team system. 🤷 It could definitely use a few tweaks though. While I agree with giving the top 4 conference chanpions a first round bye because it's basically the only way to keep conference championship games important, there simply NEEDS to be re-seeding done for the second round (not based on actual playoff seeding, but instead their final CFP ranking). I.e. the top ranked conference champion should face the lowest ranked team to win in the first round, and so on. We shouldn't have situations like Oregon vs Ohio State.
Absolutely not. I'm not gonna pretend like I think the format is perfect. Quite frankly, I don't think there is such a thing as a perfect format, but this season was made so much more interesting because of the 12-team playoff. So many more games in the regular season had playoff implications when they wouldn't have in previous years.
Could've been with bama and ole miss but smu and Indiana got the benefit of the doubt this year despite having weaker SOR and less relevant wins than bama or ole miss. At least smaller programs won't get the opportunity to score garbage time points next season
i hate bama. they beat us every single year. but the actual issue is how conferences are not equal. and just because you have zero losses or one loss doesn't mean you are more deserving than a bama team with three. anybody who watches football knows bama would smoke smu and indiana. another issue i have is how in hell can texas claim to be part of the sec when they dont play bama, lsu, the vols, ole miss or scar? that crap is rigged just as hard as indiana's schedule.
No but rewarding Indiana and smu for having 0 good wins was bad. Bama and ole miss losing up north wouldve been better but people were scared they might win. At least smaller programs with 0 good wins wont get the benefit of the doubt next year
The NCAA has watered down college football to the point that we’ve created a system that rewards teams that don’t even belong in the tournament. The answer isn’t to say, “Well, it happens in every sport,” like that’s some excuse. The answer is to recognize that the system is broken and needs to be fixed. The 12-team playoff is a flawed joke, and pretending it’s not only makes you look foolish.
@@AuburnFanSince2010Mercer did make the FCS playoffs and had 12 wins. It is when they played Mercer that bothers many people such as myself. WKU had 9 wins, USF won their bowl game over MWC team San Jose St who had Boise State beat until late 3rd quarter and into the 4th to finish with 8 wins and only Wisconsin win was over a sub .500 non conference team at Wisconsin mind you so these false narratives about SEC teams can’t win at BiG10 schools is bull crap. But you are correct about Alabama losing to schools that have bad records and were never in either game. What will further amplify the fact that Alabama clearly did not belong as other schools didn’t belong either from SEC and other conferences aside from those that got in, is if Oklahoma gets absolutely pummeled and destroyed Friday in Fort Worth in the Armed Forces Bowl against Navy.
Alabama would curb stomp SMU and Indiana. Also there are teams in the CFP with terrible losses like Clemson and ND so Alabama wouldn’t be the only team with a bad loss.
@ Oklahoma was rough but that was Alabama at their worst. But if Alabama can beat Georgia they can beat anyone when playing their best. That much is proven
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
It was literally just the first round. First round games are generally the easiest round in every sport. Im glad we have an actual playoff system like every other sport.
It’s not about “just the first round.” These games are still supposed to be meaningful, and when teams get demolished, it exposes that the playoff structure is allowing weaker teams to slip through. A real playoff system should produce competitive games in every round, including the first.
Cantr say they same for the NFL. Wild card teams have won super bowls. This isnt basketball.
@@noredoosno2929Lane Kiffin? That you?
@@noredoosno2929 well every sport playoff system is flawed then💀 by your logic
@@noredoosno2929 There is literally no way to predict (and by extension, prevent) blowouts. Games that are hosting two teams of similar talent and coaching (FSU vs. Clemson in 2013, Clemson vs. Alabama in 2018) still sometimes result in blowouts. You cannot make a system that eliminates that possibility.
12 team is good, it's the first year,it will get better.
its good , its just now you have more teams throwing their clsim at why they should be in , but ultimately the good comes with the bad
There's only going to realistically be 4 or 5 teams that can compete for a national championship every year
It’s not the first year though that’s the issue. it’s the inherent flaws in how the system is designed. We shouldn’t just sit back and say, “It’ll get better next year” as if that’s a valid response to a system that doesn’t even get the fundamentals right.
@@noredoosno2929I think ultimately it's good. The judges can still vote on the teams they think are best for viewership while the players and coaches determine their fates. There will be schools every year that argue it should be them but now it's like a 1/12 chance of making the playoffs instead 1/33. It's better for everyone.
@@MarvelandStarWarsProductionsbut its nice to see underdogs give it a go.
The average margin of victory during the 4 team playoff era was 18.6 points.
The average margin of victory for this first round of the 12 team format was 19.3.
Not exactly an earth-shattering difference, everyone calm down.
I feel like people are just complaining to complain. It was just a bad week of games
But it did suck tho
People are forgetting that the lower rank teams had to go into the higher rank teams home-field. I think the first round is always gonna be mostly blowouts and I think that’s fair.
@@AllThingsInfamous1nfl first round sucks too sometimes
I think it’s perfect. Big upsets will happen eventually, loook at March madness
Was it a mistake NO does it need to be tweaked a bit YES
Best take in the comments.
I think seeding is more the issue. Conference champions should get an auto-bid but i dont agree with the bye.
In the basketball tournament the #1 seeds are still the top ranked teams and upsets are ranked lower.
If seeding was..
1. Oregon
2. UGA
3. Texas
4. Notre Dame
Then youd get these games
5. Ohio State vs 12. Clemson
6. Penn State vs 11. AZ State
7. Tennessee vs 10. SMU
8. Indiana vs 9. Boise State
No. It will take time for programs to get recruiting bumps for appearing in the playoffs. Blowouts really don't matter as long as high school kids believe they can realistically make it to the playoffs in your program. Teams like Indiana and SMU can be much more competitive in a few years simply because of the clout making the playoffs will have for high-school kids and experienced transfers.
The playoffs aren’t even over yet, it’s too early to say if it’s a disaster yet. We have only played like 1/3 of the games in the playoff. The lower seeds went ON THE ROAD and lost to the home teams that were favored. There is still plenty of football left to play and I feel like people are overreacting WAY too much and saying that it’s a failure too early.
I mean it doesn't need to finish to tell it was a mistake.. 😂
Exactly dude , people are overreacting so bad 😂
You play all 4 of those games neutral sites and you get a whole different ball game in all 4
8 is as deep as I can imagine being relatively competitive
Five seconds of research will show there were quite a lot of blowouts in the 4 team playoff
I don't understand this talking point about teams "not deserving" to be there because they don't have a chance to go all the way and they get handled easily. This is the case in LITERALLY every other sport. When is the last time an 8 seed did anything in the nba playoffs? A wildcard team winning the Superbowl? Relax, you hyperbolic whiners. This format eliminates the teams stating that if they would have gotten in then they would have won. If a few games aren't competitive, so be it. It comes with the territory
I thought 8 was perfect. It's pretty rare that there's ever a year with more than 8 teams who have a serious national championship argument.
Its the best decision they ever made. Finally you actually get to see the best team. I now watch alot more college football since they did this. Its great!
The seeding is the main issue. Rather than guarantee a first week BYE it should only guarantee a spot in the 12 team playoff.
I still would've preferred it to be just at 8 so that none of these 3 loss teams can bitch about not getting in but oh well
12 teams is good. The rankings were terrible
People forget cfp games tend to be blowouts regardless, wouldn’t what determines whether it’s good or not is if teams under the 4 seed end up in the final or win it all?
YES! Now bring back the BCS System
I'll take this over 2 team BCS any day. It shouldn't be expanded further though.
SHOULD ONLY BE TOP 8 AND NO CONFERENCE ALLEGIANCE
WHO EVER MAKES TOP IS IN 8 big 10 8 SEC SO BE IT
No, how the teams were selected was a mistake.
No. Nothing is perfect, especially when talking NCAA football champion systems. More MEANINGFUL football is always fun. cinderella's will come, we're working with a VERY limited sample size. But good on you for initiating the discussion.
We have 6 new years bowl games and then the national championship. It always made sense to go to 8 teams. The new years 6 bowl games would consume the quarter and semi finals, and the national championship game would be a week later than usual. There has never been a year where 12 teams were in a league of their own. It's always been 3-7 teams that are above and beyond the rest.
SMU never beat a top 25 opponent yet they were supposed to compete with Penn state? You all are tripping, if you actually believed that would be a competitive game.
Fr. Fans didn't care about smu, they just wanted bama and ole miss out of the playoffs, they were worried they could win a game up north
Take these games to neural sites and the scores and possibly the outcome will be different. College basketball doesn’t seed teams based on rankings so Football doesn’t need to also
Shit happens in the FCS all the time nobody bitches and complains about “ to many teams” only at the top level this shit is a problem when it shouldn’t be literally just adopt the FCS playoffs blowouts will happen regardless
Nope 12 team playoffs wasn't a miss take but 14 team playoffs is your answer was found after the first round of this year playoffs games
It’s not getting smaller if any change will happen it will probably mean more teams and games. More games means more of an inventory for CF to sell to espn and others
First round match ups sucked but Im sure theyll get better down the line as more teams are competing to get a spot.
Could be the moons aligned this year and produced the lopsided results? Although good teams made the playoff in their own right - the powerhouses are the powerhouses - like 16 vs. 1 in the 1st round of March Madness. 😂
No, but put the best 12 teams next time.
Otherwise you will just get a bunch of good teams and a handful of teams that avoid tough OOC or got lucky avoiding the top teams in their conference.
The playoffs need to be here, just need some tweaking...
People are complaining for no reason, every sport has blowouts
0:36 just answered the question of this video
Alabama driders are the worst to ever live. Literally whining over a 3 loss team when no other 3 loss team is getting the same amount of bias if you want to play in the big games win the small ones
We're scheduling cupcakes from here on out. Alabama AD said so. Enjoy Alabama making it every year now.
@ guessing from the losses this year I don’t think Alabama can call anybody a cupcake 😂
@@movies4254 came back to say again Alabama didnt deserve it make it past Michigan first buddy
@@Keyshawn-i5g Buddy, im sorry Alabama didn't come hyped to play in the ReliaQuest Bowl. My buddies and I predicted us to lose because the team dont care. At Alabama we play for nattys, we don't give a shit about these bowl games lmfao
8 Team Playoffs You Requesting That's Lame Because The Middle Of The Road School Can't Make It In That's Lame I Strongly Disagree With your Requesting For That
as a bama fan we should have never had the chance to make the playoffs. we had a first year headcoach and it rlly showed with the inconsistency. most of us just saw the fact that smu had a cupcake schedule and thought since on paper we were the most deserving 9-3 team we should have gotten in but losing 2 horrible games is just not rlly acceptable
Only at the intro and talk about IU all you want but also tap abt the spanking tennesse got
Yes, it should’ve been 8 playoff teams.
I said the same thing when they first started talking about expansion. I was surprised when they went with 12 out of the gate. My thinking was 8 than maybe 12 down the road.
It should be top 12 teams in the rankings
No Auto-Bids for conference champions
B/c if the schedule you play is what you play and your conference is bad and your record is what you say you are…
Then you should not get in
THE FCS DOES IT SO GROW UP BCS
No, but the teams they picked weren’t the 12 best in the nation
100%. Make-A-Wish playoffs this year.
People cry, and complain too much.
The 12-team format provides an opportunity for more upsets. Maybe a team with a less impressive resume upsets a more reputable one, which makes the competition more interesting. The excitement of college football lies in the chance for the "other guys" to dismantle top-tier teams. I don't know about you, but I don’t want to watch the same 3 or 4 teams consistently win the championship. That’s not exciting at all.
In a 4 team teams still get clapped
It's not all the bracket's fault why we're seeing the Oregon-Ohio St match-up so early.
The biggest reason why we're seeing the "Championship game" this early is because Ohio St lost to Michigan as a 19.5-point favorite.
If OSU had won that game, and made it to the BIG10 Championship, no matter who would've won in the BIG10 championship game, the loser would fall no further then #7 (after byes are accounted for) and the winner would be ranked #1, which the bracket would've guaranteed that this match-up would've happened in the semi-finals or the Championship game.
We have to put more responsibility on OSU.
Now the college football committee did get it right. They did put the right teams in. It's just that games didn't go as planned in the first round. Who knows maybe in the future in the first round we might get tighter closer matchups
I miss the BCS national championship and the BCS bowl games.
18 team conferences are the mistake
Yes it's terrible. What are the these terrible takes from u guys in the comments section. U guys do understand what automatic bid means and why they went to the 12 team playoff? So smaller schools get a chance. It also means that teams from conference usa, sun belt, american, mw, and the new pac 12 will get an automatic bye if they win out. They will only consider changing it when the 14 team playoff gets here. I don't understand these brain dead comments. The most deserving teams will always get in over the better team in this format. They signed a contract for this until 2026 maybe they tweak it when the 14 team playoff gets here. Until then enjoy more blowouts and meaningless football 😂😂.
No. It’s likely going to be the best system. Automatic byes need to be removed though. Just do automatic bids and it’ll be just right.
12 teams is good they just did not pick the 12 best teams they picked the most deserving
No. Playoffs of ALL TYPES tend to have blowouts in the first round. Aka, this is NORMAL!!! But just like March Madness or the NFL playoffs we WILL eventually get Cinderella Stories that simply wouldn't have been possible with the 4-team system. 🤷
It could definitely use a few tweaks though. While I agree with giving the top 4 conference chanpions a first round bye because it's basically the only way to keep conference championship games important, there simply NEEDS to be re-seeding done for the second round (not based on actual playoff seeding, but instead their final CFP ranking). I.e. the top ranked conference champion should face the lowest ranked team to win in the first round, and so on. We shouldn't have situations like Oregon vs Ohio State.
Absolutely not. I'm not gonna pretend like I think the format is perfect. Quite frankly, I don't think there is such a thing as a perfect format, but this season was made so much more interesting because of the 12-team playoff. So many more games in the regular season had playoff implications when they wouldn't have in previous years.
Came out 45 minutes ago and there’s only 300 views 😭
Twas the night before Christmas Eve 🤷🏻♂️
12 teams is perfect it’s a a perfect amount and we get campus games
12 it perfect
Tennesse for walked. Show them
Everyone keeps imagining this will be like the ncaa tournament with Cinderellas and magical runs but that’s just not how football works
Could've been with bama and ole miss but smu and Indiana got the benefit of the doubt this year despite having weaker SOR and less relevant wins than bama or ole miss.
At least smaller programs won't get the opportunity to score garbage time points next season
i hate bama. they beat us every single year. but the actual issue is how conferences are not equal. and just because you have zero losses or one loss doesn't mean you are more deserving than a bama team with three. anybody who watches football knows bama would smoke smu and indiana. another issue i have is how in hell can texas claim to be part of the sec when they dont play bama, lsu, the vols, ole miss or scar? that crap is rigged just as hard as indiana's schedule.
Two touchdown losses are respectable.
No but rewarding Indiana and smu for having 0 good wins was bad.
Bama and ole miss losing up north wouldve been better but people were scared they might win.
At least smaller programs with 0 good wins wont get the benefit of the doubt next year
How about let’s see round 2 before we decide who is elite or not this year. People are just looking for something to talk about
Yes because then Ohio State would be eliminated already 😂
Ohio state shouldnt be in the 12 team playoffs. They are clearly the worst team selected.
There should of been only 6 the top 2 get a bye
Four was enough . 12 is too many .
We never needed playoffs and we never needed to expand them.
No
Swear it should be 8 teams
make conference champions have a spot in the playoffs not a by and only the 1st and 2nd teams get a by
Only need 8 teams
8 is the best number imo n has been
No the mistake was auto bids.
Reseed after rounds
Go back to 4 teams.
always was
The NCAA has watered down college football to the point that we’ve created a system that rewards teams that don’t even belong in the tournament. The answer isn’t to say, “Well, it happens in every sport,” like that’s some excuse. The answer is to recognize that the system is broken and needs to be fixed. The 12-team playoff is a flawed joke, and pretending it’s not only makes you look foolish.
NO it’s not
Overreact much. I am getting well tired of this narrative...geeezuz
Definitely a disappointment. Miami should have been there over Clemson.
No miami over smu clemson did decent and was the only realative close game
Bama 3-1 vs CFP opponents whereas SMU was 0-1 but sure they didn't deserve it over them?
Also 0-3 against shit teams
Lost to Vandy. Destroyed by Oklahoma. Played Mercer in November.
Alabama ain’t good.
@@AuburnFanSince2010Mercer did make the FCS playoffs and had 12 wins. It is when they played Mercer that bothers many people such as myself. WKU had 9 wins, USF won their bowl game over MWC team San Jose St who had Boise State beat until late 3rd quarter and into the 4th to finish with 8 wins and only Wisconsin win was over a sub .500 non conference team at Wisconsin mind you so these false narratives about SEC teams can’t win at BiG10 schools is bull crap. But you are correct about Alabama losing to schools that have bad records and were never in either game. What will further amplify the fact that Alabama clearly did not belong as other schools didn’t belong either from SEC and other conferences aside from those that got in, is if Oklahoma gets absolutely pummeled and destroyed Friday in Fort Worth in the Armed Forces Bowl against Navy.
8️⃣
No, this is literally the best system to make all the fans be quiet
Alabama would curb stomp SMU and Indiana. Also there are teams in the CFP with terrible losses like Clemson and ND so Alabama wouldn’t be the only team with a bad loss.
no they wouldnt
@ it’s cool to have an incorrect opinion but I will stick with the correct one.
@@BlorbusUnimax You're right...SC and OM would smack SMU and Indiana too.
Of course they would. Just like how Alabama curb stomped Oklahoma. I don't have faith that Alabama would curb stomp anyone this season.
@ Oklahoma was rough but that was Alabama at their worst. But if Alabama can beat Georgia they can beat anyone when playing their best. That much is proven
In a 4 team teams still get clapped