Barbarik's words: "I saw only the Sudarshan chakra going all around the Kurukshetra putting down all the enemies. " But the irony is that Krishna's condition to be Arjuna's charioteer was Krishna would not lift his weapon in the battle. That weapon is the Sudarshan chakra.
This is actually an interesting concept because in the bhagwat Geeta Krishna says everyone is already dead as I have killed them w my sudarshan chakra. U just have to land the killing blow. Because I want to give you and your brothers the glory.
@@abhishekanandsahoo hi bro. The information I mentioned was shown in Ramanand sagar Shree Krishna when he showed his viraat swaroop. However I believe it is in adhyaya 11 shloka 34 to 36. Hope it helps and if I'm wrong please do let me know of correction.
The story of eklavya is one of the greats of Mahabharata... It is epic in real sense,,,, not in fight or battle of Mahabharata... A guy who gave what is demanded by his teacher,,,,
In Hinduism, Khatushyam is a name and manifestation of Barbarik, grandson of Bhima and son of Mata Ahilyavati (daughter of Basuki Naag)...... wikipedia
Yes ,,,and the temple to barbrik/ratnayaksha/or kamrunag is in my home distt. Mandi ...And my province ( state) is himachal Pradesh ..u guyss can search on net about it ...and the temple is situated on top of a hill where all have to do pedestrian I mean there is a few hardly 1 or half mile road to his temple ... And its on of the powerful god till now ... U have to search about him ..u gonna shock 😊
The another name of Barbarik is Khatushyam. Shyam is the name of Lord Krishna. Lord Krishna impressed with Brabarik and gave his name to him. Jai Hind.
Barbarik was a descendant of a core primordial 'royal' serpent, and hence (because of the nature of these, which is similar to the Greek 'primordial titanic being' or the Nordic primordial beings) possessed by nature the most 'occult' AND most fundamentally supreme powers. (Although 'titanic' is not exactly the same thing as 'one of the Titans...). The only way to comprehend the Mahabharata, is the same way that you might approach the sacred verses of Homer - they are fully true to the extent that 1., they might have really happened, OR 2., they contain complex and spiritually and intellectually true ideas albeit in the form of narrative, but which are 'so' true in the Cosmic sense, that one 'accepts' that the stories relate to things as fact, and in any event such action and consequences in the narrative do happen in reality throughout Time over and over whilst ever the identities involved are not enlightened by Divinity. There is highly complex psychology involved but taken to the heights of spiritual meaning and not 'mere' animal emotional dynamics and mechanistic behavior; it's about 'living' human behavior. The Mahabharata is alive.
@@keshavsikdar9284 Thanks man - people don't really READ these texts anymore, if they ever properly did anyway. They just hear commentaries and opinions and it just ends up being a simplistic echo-chamber.
Barbarik was a legendry warrior in Hindu epic The Mahabharata. But as I am a UFO believer and researcher I believe that there is something wrong in Ancient hindu mythology which was not 5000 years old but much before recorded time maybe 20000 years BC. Hindu mythology has been linked with space Aliens n ancient astronaut theory. Ancient Aliens History Channel often describe that some Hindu God's might have been Aliens or Alien Human Hybrids.
Arrows could be a technology in those days what we have now and will have in future as we call as target marking technology. Mahabharata contain nuclear weapon, better war technology comparing to today's. and when we say this non believers say that it's false and myth but it's proven that Mahabharata was written way way before than any modern day civilization.
puran is also written by ved vyas only so if he doesn't mention everything in one book because it will get too long and heavy then he will write another book in which he will explain remaining stuff. ved vyas mahabharat is too long but still not everything can fit in it
@@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 Pls be updated. Skand Puran was written way later and its mostly based on folklores and keeps contradicting itself. Ved Vyasa is compiler of vedas. The one who taught Mahabharat was Krishna Dwaipayan Ved Vyas. And you really think that Barbaric story wasn't written in Mahabharata because it was long😂😂😂😂. You are talking about a Mahakavya which have literally 18 books. 3 to 5000 pages. And that too with whole family tree drawn out. Nowhere in that tree its shown that Barbaric was actual person or son of Bhima in Mahabharata. Mahabharat literally highlighted young to old warriors.
@@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 Lol a puran based on folklores which is considered unauthentic because of lack of source text. So yes If I am going to educate my self about Mahabharat I will go to the source text which Ved Vyasa's Mahabharat. Not some fanfiction which is written way later and is basically a fanfiction.
Last line was incorrect. What Barbareek actually said was that all he saw was krishna in the war. Krishna was the one who was killing people and Krishna was the one being killed.
Mythology means a collection of Myths. Myth can be one of the two 1) A traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events. 2) A widely held but false belief or idea. So it may be obvious that people get offended when people refer to Ramayana and MahaBharat as Myths when we have actual evidence right in front of us.
There are number of proofs slowly coming up which are pointing towards the truth if Mahabharata and Ramayana.. Even the places description is on point..
No true monk come to your radio show until and unless u invite them in personal. Thats the atitude of a monk. Just react on documantry movi of vivekananda
No Arjun had said that he would end in one day Wrong word s choose God Krishna never scare this commentator is communist. Barberik was not Kshatriya he was Rakshas
This story is wrong,it is tale,there is no barbaric character in vyasa mahabharatam,vyasa bharatham is proof for us,nobody can defeat Arjuna,Arjuna had pasupath ashram given by lard siva,lard siva gave it only to Arjuna,no other weapon can defeat pasupath asthram.
![[SFM] Risky Recital](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RzNkY1_Nk3o/mqdefault.jpg)
You are great ...
Hare Krishna
जय श्री कृष्णा🚩🚩🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏
Last line was incorrect. Barbaric said he only saw krishna all over in the battle field.
Barbaric's only nd lone temple is in rajasthan known as" khatu shyam "like 2 hours journey max may b less from Jaipur.....
There’s another temple in Manali near hidamba temple , yeh Rajasthan temple is much famous though
Jai shree Krishna
This is a reality of ancient time.its not only history or mythology.
J sri krishna
Barbarik's words: "I saw only the Sudarshan chakra going all around the Kurukshetra putting down all the enemies. "
But the irony is that Krishna's condition to be Arjuna's charioteer was Krishna would not lift his weapon in the battle. That weapon is the Sudarshan chakra.
This is actually an interesting concept because in the bhagwat Geeta Krishna says everyone is already dead as I have killed them w my sudarshan chakra. U just have to land the killing blow. Because I want to give you and your brothers the glory.
@@tigermoorjani
Can you please site the Adhyaya (chapter) and the Shloka (verse)?
@@abhishekanandsahoo hi bro. The information I mentioned was shown in Ramanand sagar Shree Krishna when he showed his viraat swaroop. However I believe it is in adhyaya 11 shloka 34 to 36. Hope it helps and if I'm wrong please do let me know of correction.
There is a tv series of ramayana and mahabharat if u want to know about the india and hindusim
Also Devon ke dev Mahadev
You are amazing professor...
hare ka sahara baba syam hamara
Jai shri ram
So sweet video really your all
Very nice story indeed. Thanks for bringing many facts to light which many Indians forgot .
Tx❤️
all the wepons made at this time used at thousands year ago atom bomb is called bharmaastr at that time
No
@@hammer.11011 shut up
The story of eklavya is one of the greats of Mahabharata... It is epic in real sense,,,, not in fight or battle of Mahabharata... A guy who gave what is demanded by his teacher,,,,
Awesome Information Indian Monk !
In Hinduism, Khatushyam is a name and manifestation of Barbarik, grandson of Bhima and son of Mata Ahilyavati (daughter of Basuki Naag)...... wikipedia
hulk man and I worship khatu shyam jai sri shyam
I have gone there I am devotee of Baba Shyam
You can visit his temple in India. It is situated in Mandi District of Himachal Pradesh State and the name of deity is Kamrunaag Devta.
His head was placed there by Pandavas after they left their Kingdom and went to Himalayas for lifelong tapasya
Yes ,,,and the temple to barbrik/ratnayaksha/or kamrunag is in my home distt. Mandi ...And my province ( state) is himachal Pradesh ..u guyss can search on net about it ...and the temple is situated on top of a hill where all have to do pedestrian I mean there is a few hardly 1 or half mile road to his temple ... And its on of the powerful god till now ... U have to search about him ..u gonna shock 😊
u r awesome professor
You See role KRISHNA
YES Good
Nice video professor.
I believe this is a truth.
Absolutely true
You are awesome... Even i didn't know the story of this warrior..!! May be i would have at some point but i dont remember him at all
Barbarik temple is at Khatushyam, Rajasthan
Lord Krishna was in Political version of himself in the battlefield. 👍👍
Regarding the conclusion, Barbarik actually said that, in the war Krishna was everywhere and noone else.
Nice job man 😅👍💐
Same as what you saw in the video of sadhgury
Hi...can u do the airvapex X review...seems like it's selling likr hot cakes in US
Barbarik is great worriar
The another name of Barbarik is Khatushyam. Shyam is the name of Lord Krishna. Lord Krishna impressed with Brabarik and gave his name to him. Jai Hind.
Pllllll
Ll
Lll
Ok ll
Ll
I have heard about this warrior
👍
Mahabharata 🙏
👍👍👍✌️✌️✌️
Nice reaction Professor Ji
Very big
barbarik is the best fither
Barbarik was greatest arya warrior.
Namaste professor kese ho🙏
See- 101india( Chambal)
hallo sir nice vide rection i am indian namastey
This teampl may city
Sir U should Watch MAHABHARATA it is very interesting.....series
You can watch Mahabharata serial of BR Chopra made in 1980's to understand the story of Barbarik
Barbarik was a descendant of a core primordial 'royal' serpent, and hence (because of the nature of these, which is similar to the Greek 'primordial titanic being' or the Nordic primordial beings) possessed by nature the most 'occult' AND most fundamentally supreme powers. (Although 'titanic' is not exactly the same thing as 'one of the Titans...).
The only way to comprehend the Mahabharata, is the same way that you might approach the sacred verses of Homer - they are fully true to the extent that 1., they might have really happened, OR 2., they contain complex and spiritually and intellectually true ideas albeit in the form of narrative, but which are 'so' true in the Cosmic sense, that one 'accepts' that the stories relate to things as fact, and in any event such action and consequences in the narrative do happen in reality throughout Time over and over whilst ever the identities involved are not enlightened by Divinity. There is highly complex psychology involved but taken to the heights of spiritual meaning and not 'mere' animal emotional dynamics and mechanistic behavior; it's about 'living' human behavior. The Mahabharata is alive.
I don't know why your comment is not recognized much. But ur comment is exceptional.
@@keshavsikdar9284 Thanks man - people don't really READ these texts anymore, if they ever properly did anyway. They just hear commentaries and opinions and it just ends up being a simplistic echo-chamber.
Sir there is full series of mahabharat on youtube..suryaputra karna(son of god sun..karna). His story is very intresting.
Dbz tshirt 😍
Barbarik was a legendry warrior in Hindu epic The Mahabharata. But as I am a UFO believer and researcher I believe that there is something wrong in Ancient hindu mythology which was not 5000 years old but much before recorded time maybe 20000 years BC. Hindu mythology has been linked with space Aliens n ancient astronaut theory. Ancient Aliens History Channel often describe that some Hindu God's might have been Aliens or Alien Human Hybrids.
make a video on epic Ramayan or Mahabharat
Arrows could be a technology in those days what we have now and will have in future as we call as target marking technology. Mahabharata contain nuclear weapon, better war technology comparing to today's. and when we say this non believers say that it's false and myth but it's proven that Mahabharata was written way way before than any modern day civilization.
sink the on screen video with the one you watch... reactions get delayed.
Barbaric is no where mentioned in Ved vyasa's Mahabharta. He appears in skand puran. Basically a folklore
puran is also written by ved vyas only so if he doesn't mention everything in one book because it will get too long and heavy then he will write another book in which he will explain remaining stuff. ved vyas mahabharat is too long but still not everything can fit in it
@@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 Pls be updated. Skand Puran was written way later and its mostly based on folklores and keeps contradicting itself.
Ved Vyasa is compiler of vedas.
The one who taught Mahabharat was Krishna Dwaipayan Ved Vyas. And you really think that Barbaric story wasn't written in Mahabharata because it was long😂😂😂😂. You are talking about a Mahakavya which have literally 18 books. 3 to 5000 pages. And that too with whole family tree drawn out. Nowhere in that tree its shown that Barbaric was actual person or son of Bhima in Mahabharata. Mahabharat literally highlighted young to old warriors.
@@thethreespikes9737 have you heard of it or read it completely yourself?
@@thethreespikes9737 so atleast skan puran mentions about him right and that's all matters.
@@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 Lol a puran based on folklores which is considered unauthentic because of lack of source text. So yes If I am going to educate my self about Mahabharat I will go to the source text which Ved Vyasa's Mahabharat. Not some fanfiction which is written way later and is basically a fanfiction.
make a video on border or loc kargil movie
I am his predecessor talk to me sir his temple is in himachal India. You can find gold open in his temple
No man the main temple of Barbarik Baba is in khatushayam, Rajsthan
Now the arrow is hydrozen bomb.
No one is talking about Ekalavya..
Last line was incorrect. What Barbareek actually said was that all he saw was krishna in the war. Krishna was the one who was killing people and Krishna was the one being killed.
That three AROOWS are not given by supreme Shiv those arrow was given by mata vaishno that 3 AROOWS can destroy the whole earth in few seconds
Please react to October the direct is piku s drictr
Whu don't you syncing videos
Mythology means a collection of Myths. Myth can be one of the two 1) A traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events. 2) A widely held but false belief or idea. So it may be obvious that people get offended when people refer to Ramayana and MahaBharat as Myths when we have actual evidence right in front of us.
There are number of proofs slowly coming up which are pointing towards the truth if Mahabharata and Ramayana.. Even the places description is on point..
Our vedas are already accepted as authentic.. Bible and quran however, can not be called authentic
watch chatrpati shivaji maharaj animation
Please react to mahabharat it is available on hotstar. See the full season with us
No true monk come to your radio show until and unless u invite them in personal. Thats the atitude of a monk. Just react on documantry movi of vivekananda
You can watch all episodes of Mahabharat on hotstar. www.hotstar.com/tv/mahabharat/s-28/shantanu-accepts-bhishma-as-son/1000011769
barbarik couldnt end a war in 60 seconds he was sworn made a oath to fight for the weaker side so there fore he couldnt end the war
She has explained very shortly.. Sadhguru explained it better
Dragon Ball Z Yeah
Marney wale b Krishna marnay wale b Krishna,Krishna was all over in Mahabharta
hi professor, can you please delete this video....🙏
@@DevendraMahendraSingh because he didn't participated in Mahabharata
@@DevendraMahendraSingh yes
Why ???
Why you are asking to remove this video ?
Warrior aren't monk plz there huge differene monks don't go in war but are teacher of the great warrior.
Karbala battle is bigger than mahabharat??????
If you are really serious about this then reply me
Well he was one of the greatest but greatest was "Karna"
No Arjun had said that he would end in one day
Wrong word s choose God Krishna never scare
this commentator is communist.
Barberik was not Kshatriya he was Rakshas
This story is wrong,it is tale,there is no barbaric character in vyasa mahabharatam,vyasa bharatham is proof for us,nobody can defeat Arjuna,Arjuna had pasupath ashram given by lard siva,lard siva gave it only to Arjuna,no other weapon can defeat pasupath asthram.
you are wrong
What u Didi at last....it shows this video nothing more than a business idea for u....sory my English is bad..
please do not react in such videos. i dont like this 👎👎👎 please
Jai shree krishna