@NavalR can't thank you enough for sharing these convos, they've changed the course of my career. After graduating from medical school last year, I immediately pivoted to computer science instead pursuing clinical training. The ideas you share have played a large part in the decision. I'm now at Carnegie Mellon getting a masters in CS and AI, with plans to apply code and machine intelligence to medicine. Your impact is felt out here in Pittsburgh, please keep going. ✌
1:50 domain experts are usually problem oriented 30:35 mind blowing Deutsch insight 32:10 religions hold in large swathes of the multiverse, because they too hold knowledge, knowledge of how to exploit human psychology viciously to replicate
Quiqquuiiiujiuuiiiiiiiuiiuuijuijiiiiuiiiiujuiuiuuiuuuuiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuiiiuiiuujuuiiiuiuuiuiujiiuiiiuiuu uiiiiuipjiuuiuuiiiiuiiukuuuiiiiiuun oui un jiiiuiuuiiuiiji ou jiiipiuuiiiiuiuu jeujuuuujuuuiijjijiiiiiiuuiuiiuuuuiuiijijiijuiiiujjuijiuiuiijuiiuiijjiiuijjiuiuiuiiuuiiuiuujuiuip uiuuuujuiuuui ou iuuuujjuuuuiiuii un iuuiiuuiii un uijkuuuuuiuiiiuuiiiiiiuiiujjjiiiiuiuiki juin i ou i uniiiiii
This dude is so freaking genius. I’ve benefitted a lot in business by understanding his conception of knowledge. I’ll come back and comment once I’ve made a milly.
Thank you for these conversations. I'm a big fan of Deutsch. But I do admit to a bit of nervousness thinking about "no limit on the amount of error" available to us, without any sideboards for the distribution of error producing information. Things worked out well for the war time anti-fascists in Britain, not so much for those in Germany. I don't know what the solution is to this conundrum. I'd be interested in what sort of safeguards David would suggest. Thanks.
It's not as bad though; Deutsch assigns the size of error to the religion aspect and not the truth one in the final part... So, the ?truth-seeking type of? knowledge can grow unlimitedly too.
I'm enjoying the content, but the way in which this conversation was chopped does not lend itself to easy understanding. I urge you to not cut content like this, since it really takes context away, and many listeners will fail to fill in those blanks.
@NavalR can't thank you enough for sharing these convos, they've changed the course of my career. After graduating from medical school last year, I immediately pivoted to computer science instead pursuing clinical training. The ideas you share have played a large part in the decision. I'm now at Carnegie Mellon getting a masters in CS and AI, with plans to apply code and machine intelligence to medicine. Your impact is felt out here in Pittsburgh, please keep going. ✌
Having to listen to Naval Podcast makes me enlightened
1:50 domain experts are usually problem oriented
30:35 mind blowing Deutsch insight
32:10 religions hold in large swathes of the multiverse, because they too hold knowledge, knowledge of how to exploit human psychology viciously to replicate
Just hit the LIKE button already because u know the two will not disappoint you
Quiqquuiiiujiuuiiiiiiiuiiuuijuijiiiiuiiiiujuiuiuuiuuuuiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuiiiuiiuujuuiiiuiuuiuiujiiuiiiuiuu uiiiiuipjiuuiuuiiiiuiiukuuuiiiiiuun oui un jiiiuiuuiiuiiji ou jiiipiuuiiiiuiuu jeujuuuujuuuiijjijiiiiiiuuiuiiuuuuiuiijijiijuiiiujjuijiuiuiijuiiuiijjiiuijjiuiuiuiiuuiiuiuujuiuip uiuuuujuiuuui ou iuuuujjuuuuiiuii un iuuiiuuiii un uijkuuuuuiuiiiuuiiiiiiuiiujjjiiiiuiuiki juin i ou i uniiiiii
This dude is so freaking genius. I’ve benefitted a lot in business by understanding his conception of knowledge. I’ll come back and comment once I’ve made a milly.
God finally responded to my prayers of new content from Naval 😍
Naval can you please make something about this AI thing pls❤ love from India (up)
Didn't expect this podcast! 😲😲
Finally, I was waiting soooo long for it ❤ thank you
We are waiting 💙
We love u
I had to listen to the last 15 minutes for a couple of times to grasp the idea that of how truth/ information is propogated
And huge props to you and your work!
Thank you for these conversations. I'm a big fan of Deutsch. But I do admit to a bit of nervousness thinking about "no limit on the amount of error" available to us, without any sideboards for the distribution of error producing information. Things worked out well for the war time anti-fascists in Britain, not so much for those in Germany. I don't know what the solution is to this conundrum. I'd be interested in what sort of safeguards David would suggest. Thanks.
I hear Brett Hall's excellent comments mixed in there, but don't see any citations of his contributions.
i have the privilege and burden of having gone to college with Naval. He clearly deserved the education more than I.
Oh really ?
Yeeeessssssssss. Just about this video as a whole.
Thanks 👍
worth the waitt!
Also a recent med school grad, considering CS vs anaesthesiology training
So interesting. Thank you
Naval finally remembered his RUclips password
4. YT channel Deep knowledge is best❤
Incredible
🙌
11:31 25:36
Please make an extensive video on AI, Naval.
Its clear no why Author Prof Nassim Nicolas liking Naval.
Haha how Naval just tried to improvise and save thinking he holds dear, but very good overall
It's not as bad though; Deutsch assigns the size of error to the religion aspect and not the truth one in the final part...
So, the ?truth-seeking type of? knowledge can grow unlimitedly too.
😮
And 4 also
There should be less add.. Like vsauce did...
Dave-🇩🇪
Nb4 a million views
I'm enjoying the content, but the way in which this conversation was chopped does not lend itself to easy understanding. I urge you to not cut content like this, since it really takes context away, and many listeners will fail to fill in those blanks.
First view 🙋
First comment
lets get deep, then laugh about the sound of fart noises
When is airchat coming to android? 🥲