Mr. O'Neil is a class act. I remember when Princess Madeleine was set to marry her longtime boyfriend Jonas & he was going to receive the male equivalent of her title. I was all for it. Then it came out he cheated, though it was strongly hinted at when the wedding was "delayed" then cancelled because she was initially marrying a few months after her sister, Victoria. Any other man would insist on a title, but Mr. O'Neil showed he only wanted Madeleine & to be happy. And she's more than happy to do her charity work & move to support his career. I saw an interview they did & they are the most loveable, down to earth couple.
Umm “no precedent for giving a commoner husband a title on their marriage to a princess??” Please check your history and see what happened when Princess Margaret married a commoner- oh that’s right, they made him an earl
When this video feature says "there is No Precedent...", it simply means that granting Royal Titles to commoner husbands of women royals has no "legal tradition" being followed, that no royal decrees patent had allowed it in recent history. What happened to Anthony Armstrong Jones was Exceptional owing to the fact that he married a granddaughter, daughter and sister of 3 successive monarchs, making her proximity to the throne veritably credible, and therefore would be unfair for their future children to be sort of ostracized if left with no titles just because their dad was a commoner. That's why Elizabeth II made the EXCEPTION by offering the couple a Noble (NOT Royal) Title, Earl & Countess Snowdon. In fact, Tony Snowdon NEVER had HRH before his official name, which further solidifies the point that indeed there Is NO precedent in that category. (Their children however are still addressed with Lord and Lady to this day.)
for the "von Fürstenberg" example: by german law you are entitled to keep the name forever if you insist; unless Alexandra gave it up she is still Alexandra Prinzessin von Fürstenberg
Illustrious Grimaldi dynasty? Are you kidding? The man had at least 2 children out of wedlock and hid this from this present wife. That is sleazy, not "illustrious". And Ranier was not faithful either.
Your video is 👎 please stick to the children of the siblings of a reigning king, not to persons who married a Royal. Normally if a man without a title marries a princess their children do not automatically get a royal title. Only if a current King or Queen wants to give a title. Like Queen Elizabeth II who wanted to give the children of Princess Anne a title but she refused. In the Netherlands for example only the wife of the King, Queen Máxima has a title: Queen Consort. The wives of all other princes have a title by courtesy of the King. The are adressed as Your Royal Highness or Your Highness because they are married to a Prince. If a Princess marries a commoner he can never use the HRH title.
hate the AI accent anyway but i dont enjoy an accent from a country with no monarchy on this subject if one has a basic understanding how monarchy works it is not rocket science, if the mother is the royal, and the father is untitled you are just Mr or Miss Joe Blogs
![[SFM] Risky Recital](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RzNkY1_Nk3o/mqdefault.jpg)
Mr. O'Neil is a class act. I remember when Princess Madeleine was set to marry her longtime boyfriend Jonas & he was going to receive the male equivalent of her title. I was all for it. Then it came out he cheated, though it was strongly hinted at when the wedding was "delayed" then cancelled because she was initially marrying a few months after her sister, Victoria.
Any other man would insist on a title, but Mr. O'Neil showed he only wanted Madeleine & to be happy. And she's more than happy to do her charity work & move to support his career. I saw an interview they did & they are the most loveable, down to earth couple.
So you focused on the in-laws but forgot about the children of Princess Anne?
Umm “no precedent for giving a commoner husband a title on their marriage to a princess??” Please check your history and see what happened when Princess Margaret married a commoner- oh that’s right, they made him an earl
their son is now 2nd Earl of Snowdon; the title was even hereditary
When this video feature says "there is No Precedent...", it simply means that granting Royal Titles to commoner husbands of women royals has no "legal tradition" being followed, that no royal decrees patent had allowed it in recent history.
What happened to Anthony Armstrong Jones was Exceptional owing to the fact that he married a granddaughter, daughter and sister of 3 successive monarchs, making her proximity to the throne veritably credible, and therefore would be unfair for their future children to be sort of ostracized if left with no titles just because their dad was a commoner.
That's why Elizabeth II made the EXCEPTION by offering the couple a Noble (NOT Royal) Title, Earl & Countess Snowdon. In fact, Tony Snowdon NEVER had HRH before his official name, which further solidifies the point that indeed there Is NO precedent in that category. (Their children however are still addressed with Lord and Lady to this day.)
Wrong photo of George V. It shows his son.George VI
for the "von Fürstenberg" example: by german law you are entitled to keep the name forever if you insist; unless Alexandra gave it up she is still Alexandra Prinzessin von Fürstenberg
Princess Eugenie not Eugene.
DUDE.. it’s not Your SINCERE Highness it’s Your SERENE Highness…(ya did a VOCAL blooper on your Monaco “rap.”
His "sincere" highness
Illustrious Grimaldi dynasty? Are you kidding? The man had at least 2 children out of wedlock and hid this from this present wife. That is sleazy, not "illustrious". And Ranier was not faithful either.
Your video is 👎 please stick to the children of the siblings of a reigning king, not to persons who married a Royal. Normally if a man without a title marries a princess their children do not automatically get a royal title. Only if a current King or Queen wants to give a title. Like Queen Elizabeth II who wanted to give the children of Princess Anne a title but she refused. In the Netherlands for example only the wife of the King, Queen Máxima has a title: Queen Consort. The wives of all other princes have a title by courtesy of the King. The are adressed as Your Royal Highness or Your Highness because they are married to a Prince. If a Princess marries a commoner he can never use the HRH title.
Queen Consort is not a title, but a description. A Queen is HM the Queen, whether Regnant or Consort.
There were a lot of mispronounced names.
You talk too fast.
hate the AI accent anyway but i dont enjoy an accent from a country with no monarchy on this subject if one has a basic understanding how monarchy works it is not rocket science, if the mother is the royal, and the father is untitled you are just Mr or Miss Joe Blogs