---------合作邀約請洽--------- Email : boni@pressplay.cc ------------------❤︎------------------- Follow Me On Social Media Instagram : / bonibaobao Facebook : / movieandprejudice
Look! We have got a gender pay gap denier in here! This world is still going by this rule of thumb: If a girl wants to stop getting harassed at the club, she should get a boyfriend. Think about the implication of this statement then revise your third opinion. After all, Ana may fool everyone, but that's built on the assumption that she "has" a rich dad wasn't it?
@@onebrokegirl3864 First of all, I have the right to speak, isn't that the case in a democracy? You can disagree, but you can't ask me to revise or ban my speech. Second, the question is "Does it have to be rich dad or it has to be a boy?" You can't deny that there are great women, like: Virginia Marie Nicosia, Mary Teresa Barra, Abigail Pierrepont Johnson, you can't deny that these people exist ,are these all relying on rich dad? Can't it be relying on rich mother? "Men in the workplace have advantages in the workplace." I don't deny this, there is progress, but it can be better, but does it have to be rich dad or I don't agree with being a man, isn't this denying the upper-class women in the film? At last, I would like to clarify that I have not stated my position, I have just put forward a different point of view, your definition is just your personal misunderstanding to me, if it isn’t that those who support you are all enemies, then I think I haven't a way to communicate with you.
@@ruei7873 It's not that I have an misunderstanding, but it's your "point of view" is completely rhetorical because it has epically failed to address the real experience of most women in real life AT THE MOMENT. Sure it's you're freedom to express anything, but the ignorance and privileged attitude of such "point of view" is appalling. You might think you're just making an innocent, logical argument, but there's people living this shit right here, right now. And this sad truth would predictably still hold true in the next two decades. So your opinion are actually expressing "Why can't women just be happy that a few of them have been granted the privilege of the men? It could have been none! Eventually it'll be others' turn, perhaps it'll take another centruy but can't they just be patient? Why do they must make us look bad and guilt tripping men?" About the inherting richness from a mother or denying the upper class women, what have mistaken what truly made Ana or their success. It's not the money but status, so unless their mother is the Queen of England, their success or privilege are still inherited from a male family member. Plus that's also under the premise where there's not a King. Think about the Korean richest family, would the princess of Samsung still able to be in the position where she is now if she not only has one brother but three instead? I don't blame you for your ignorance, cus just like women doesn't how painful it actually is if man got their balls kicked, you probably have never applied a job or joining a workplace as a female. To fill in that knowledge gap, perhaps you can check out some transgender talking about what have change to their career. Almost all transmen have claimed it became easier to get an offer or promotion, and transwomen have experience the opposite, getting an offer or career advancement has became more difficult compare to when they were male.
@@onebrokegirl3864 Uh... you still don't get what I'm talking about... In response to the current social situation, I just mentioned the second item in the message. I understand the current workplace ecology problem, and I also know that regulations and national education need to be improved. Taking the Republic of China as an example, even if we set an equality treaty for women, there will still be supervisors. Taking advantage of legal loopholes to suppress female employees, it is obvious that concepts and values need to be re-educated, but this is to improve the laws and introduce correct gender into the education system, rather than cursing the symptoms but not the root cause. As for whether there will be improvement in the next 20 years, how to determine? Suppose the case I gave became a "rich mother" and gave resources to the next generation (assuming girls), wouldn't it be true? And I'm talking about women's success stories. I want to put forward another perspective to see things. How can we talk if you are not at this level? You say women should satisfy a few men to give them the chance to succeed? I didn't say that, I made it very clear that we are not the parties, and there is no way to be sure that they are using the resources of men, not to mention that I premise that "they worked hard for themselves", in order to affirm their achievements, you want I've been "misunderstanding" or "applying your life tragedy", I really can't communicate with you. In Anna's case, I just want to say, isn't the point that you don't need to rely on "rich dad", but only rely on funds and her personal plan to succeed? Otherwise, would the outstanding women beside him depend on men? Can you be sure that they do not rely on complete plans and capital to attract investment?
@@ruei7873 oh dear, 飽妮's explanation has just flew over you head! First of all, I wasn't instituting "my life tragedy" in the last comment. All women experience these kind of microaggression that men or even women themselves don't notice. Who formed the ecosystem of work? Human, all genders. Laying out the systematic problems, dehumanising the problems is the root cause of why this insufficient communication. You don't realise it don't you? You only know all about unfairness on paper, you even able to write an essay about it (which you sorta did), but you don't truly understand the consequence or reality of these unfairness. To women, your perspective is as old as the babyboomers. Such unfairness is so distance to you, you only understand the good properties so you can only call a celebration to that and downplay the bad properties. It's the same mindset of the Chinese saying why you have to look at the bad news of China, can't you just and solely talk about the good news? Problems is the good and bad are inseparable. When discribing a picture one can't just describe a corner and say that's a good picture. What I simply saying is, when you think about gender inequality, you can't just discuss it on paper, on surface, you can't start off the thinking process from men's perspective (which you did) but you gotta start off as a woman. Just think about it, if Anna didn't claimed she has a "rich dad", but she has a "rich mom", could she still be as sucess? Maybe, only maybe, and it would take her double or triple efforts to achieve the same achievement. And eventually people will be asking where does her mom's money came from until they got a man's name, which will be that man's name be the ultimate pinnacle that allow her to get the sponsor and success. And people will remember her connection with that man's name, not her mother. So, does her complete plan and intelligent gain her eventual sucess? Yes. Does her success rely on these and other factors as not important? No.
![OsamaSon - ik what you did last summer [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4DIQDnu3mr4/mqdefault.jpg)
讓我聯想到女版賈伯斯伊莉莎白．荷姆斯，用一滴血詐騙一群矽谷創業家的惡血事件，而且還是真的拿到錢了。
其實這部劇有點無法說服我的地方⋯劇中強調Anna 是一個超級聰明，眼光獨到又很有見解的人，但對這方面的描述不太深刻。比較印象深刻只有幫她男友募資、還有在畫廊說服另一位富豪不要買黃色抽象照片改買黑白照片的那兩次。 其他大部分都只是演出她很了解時尚，到處party 和旅行，大罵工作人員“你知道我是誰嗎” 。
不過也許就是這樣才更凸顯這事件有多荒謬吧。
那些細節都是虛構的
@@bone13tw 我的意思是，從她的戲裡感受不太到超級聰明或有見解這樣的形容，因為每個人都這樣說她，讓我更好奇到底是多聰明和會講話。虛構或實際的都沒關係，主要是覺得要多著墨才能讓這個描寫更有說服力。
@@W_Sushi 認同。我覺得這是編劇的問題...
還有他幫男友在船上化險為夷的募到資金，抓住Nora的弱點甚至從男友身上「搶」走Nora的喜愛，高級俱樂部的籌劃中懂得「透過誰」去說服誰，其實都算安娜洞悉人性的優勢（只是她的「才華」用錯地方）
對對對！我看的時候有一種很違和的感覺
還有女記者的形象也塑造的很不能理解
我只看到一個躁鬱 沒同理心 自我中心的記者
超級喜歡飽妮這支影片的服裝跟妝容～～
超美
超適合講恐怖片
飽妮的妝容服裝氣質也太驚為天人 好喜歡🥰沒辦法專心看解說了🤣
我是覺得安娜從一開始就錯了,因為一切都奠基於她"不存在的信託基金"。她如果聰明一點應該從這些過程中真的把募到的錢慢慢越滾越大,假的變成真的才是厲害。
不過片中探討的男女創業議題的確值得思考。
但有成功拿到錢嗎？
@@knight555 你沒看電視劇嗎? 雖然沒有拿到大筆的，但20-30萬美金還是有，可是都被她吃喝玩樂花掉了
@@katechu8219 沒看，這個題材我還好。
大約1000萬新台幣，但不是一口氣拿到的吧。
是分多次而且為了裝闊花掉了，不然怎麼取信於人。
那樣要投資很難吧。
又不是每個人都是股神巴菲特。
@@knight555 是一次拿到的喔，都拿去買奢侈物品跟度假了。所以說如果真的聰明，會拿這些錢去越滾越大，而不是無腦的花光。
@@katechu8219 那就真的是她自己活該了。
不過一千萬真要燒錢也燒很快。
安娜只是把基金會當成騙錢藉口
就算拿到貸款.也不會認真經營
一定是隨便亂花後跑路.
比對安娜和Tinder大騙徒Simon Leviev的後續發展，真的⋯⋯很替安娜抱屈啊！世界上最不能騙的就是有錢人的錢，騙有情人的愛反而被認為很有辦法，這世界真是太變態了！
為何要為無恥騙子抱屈?? 不要把虛構的劇中人和真實的安娜搞混了, 去看她真實的訪問影片, 無恥囂張得令人噁心
我覺得，這樣的觀點有點一竿子打翻一船人......
（1）「創造安娜」你可以解讀成是個想拉攏投資卻創業失敗的女孩，但重點是「事實」與「後續行為」，起初以謊報的身世與不存在的資產去拉攏投資客本身就有誘導行事的情況，以刻意的行為去影響當事人的判斷這是最大爭議，加上後續的欠款問題才是他會被送審的關鍵
（2）tinder本身也是一個詐騙情事，當事人也送監獄了，這也是事實，場外討論的「拜金觀念」我覺得過於偏激了，以題外話來探討確實是個課題，但這項討論不會影響女孩受騙的情形，所以我覺得她們仍是受害者，不能以同一件事情論，就如同以下例子：
A.今日有一個長期受爸爸家暴的孩子因再也無法忍受，一怒之下殺害父親。依法孩子有罪，然而了解動機後我們也會開始省思這個社會的問題並為孩子感到惋惜
B.今有一男子聽信友人說要經營事業，問有沒有興趣投資，而該男亦選擇投資，但最後發現友人捐款逃逸。就法律而言友人欠債未還，但我們也會審視是否大眾對於「人情關係」或是對於事情考證的積極度不足，導致法律觀念不良而無進行抵押之操作
@@bone13tw 「抱屈」只是針對兩者得到的制裁並不相當這點而論（一人入獄且即將被遣返，另一人即將進軍好萊塢），當然兩人都是無恥的大騙子，沒有要為他們開脫的意思。
@@MySoundClub 誰要進軍好萊塢？妄想症嘴硬的屁話別當真，就算是真的，拒絕消費讓他們慘賠，騙多了總會遇到暴力的更壞人，讓我們拭目以待
創造安娜 女主角 除茱莉亞嘉納 另外一位飾演記者的 安娜克倫斯基成名代表作 就是 "小鬼初戀" 跟麥考利克金合作，結果片中的 安娜德維的晚宴 就號稱有 "克金家族兄弟"出現XDD 然後 克倫斯基這個姓氏又是俄羅斯姓啊!! 這選角 真得很有意思!
應該不是說 上訴喔! 美國的訴訟程序 應該是 拒絕認罪協商 決定接受大法庭預審，再到小法庭的陪審團制接受判決喔!
我真的沒辦法說她聰明耶。厲害的詐騙犯，拐到錢後就馬上改頭換面遠走高飛，她好不容易跑到LA卻還要發IG＂我在LA哦！＂，差點被她蠢到哭出來。她是太習慣騙人，連自己也騙了，以為她真的是名流（扶額）
ruclips.net/video/JCnsnaRSAiQ/видео.html&feature=share
從這個真實安娜的訪談可看出，安娜就真的是一個騙子-冷酷又沒有同理心。
本來看完影集對安娜還有點同情及婉惜的説😅
Netflix付的買故事錢沒有經過安娜.
而是直接給司法系統代收付給受害方.
不會笨到直接給坐牢安娜.
最爽的一幕是和解大會最左邊的那位朋友，直接當著ANNA 的面批她就是個三流騙子還唸了一番，只差沒當場一巴掌賞過去可惜了
看了幾個影評 覺得很可惜的一點是大多聚焦在這部影集那邊符合真實 那邊是虛構的
但這影集真正令人感動的是記者vivian關心anna 帶出一種女性主義的議題
我是男生 我看即將出生的孩子與工作的拉扯，常常很悸動，感受得到她有多愛又有多恨這個孩子
至於安娜口中的女權 完全只是唬人手段
創造安娜真的超好看！根本停不下來！
我想說說個人觀點
我覺得本片切入角度很多
如果只用「創業」心態看有點片面
（1）對於這部片呈現的是「上流人士」一切行事以「名聲&金錢」衡量，便是諷刺這社會的人心，也變相表現了現今追求金錢而盲目行事的社會弊病，然而片中也體現出許多金融體系及公司體制上依照「人情關係」產生的行政疏漏，顯現體制上對於權力的畏懼
（2）對於「社群媒體」所呈現的表象總是光鮮亮麗的，確實，在IG上誰不曾說點謊，但這樣顯漏了人在這樣的互動所體現的「虛榮心」，當這樣的情事發生，是否在表述人為了追求社會認同而積極包裝自己，進而吸引他人肯定自身符合社會價值
（3）對於女主的雄心壯志在片中是可以體現的，然而這是不是只能是「男性才能生存的紐約」我覺得有待商榷，片中也有出現出現在時報上的傑出女性，如果忽略不看有點過於獨斷得出結論，如果要看待這一案件，比較像是「一個籌碼不多卻一直想在賭場全盤all in的豪賭，然而後續持續借錢又賭輸，直到最後無法承擔龐大債務」的情形
（4）這件事情最令人震驚的就是在於他「編造了自己的出身背景與資產，卻仍舊能吸引眾多豪紳投資」，在查證不完全的情況下這些人依舊投入這個計畫也是令人瞠目結舌的部分，但也是因為這個條件坐實了她就是「詐騙」而非「創業」的差別，今天判決會定讞有罪就是在於她並無實際資本去進行計畫，一切的名義都是「偽造的」，你可以說這是投資風險，或是她有沒有惡意行使的動機問題所以沒有刑事問題，但如若主張返還無法給付就是後續最大的問題
（5）對於劇中瑞秋的刻畫我覺得是爭議最大的，導演的角度會呈現出他是為了錢而犧牲姊妹，確實，出發點來說也是因為這人有錢接近他，但就事論事，今天是欠錢不還的狀況，依照法律流程我認為並無不妥，要討論是否有道德上的問題我覺得不能強迫每個人配合社會的觀點，畢竟你我都不是當事人，所以是否有過度審論他的行為我覺得有討論空間
題外話//
我覺得tinder的部分，犯人本身動機是利用男女感情去騙取財務著實不妥，這些女孩也真的是遇人不淑，然而探討是否在富豪面前大家會有「先入為主的評斷」則是場外討論（我沒有要支持論述，我也覺得偏激，僅客觀討論），我沒有要說他們是拜金，但是客觀討論我們要省思的是是否在社會體制的教育、制度、風氣及人際互動下，我們是否自然而然已經把富家公子或是千金小姐定位在理想的伴侶條件？
若要對於這個詐騙案件提出抗爭，我認為要在法條上進行修正，畢竟這是依法行事的社會，犯人最終判的刑期也不高這是事實，然綜觀國際上對於情感詐騙、外遇的罰責已經開始弱化，這也表示國際間認為男女情愛的關係法院採個人自由主義，而我們也說「法律是道德的底線」這樣我們是否該省思這類情勢只能憑社會主流道德，還是普大眾都認為此事有罪責？亦或是這類男女情感已經是新一代的思維模式？
Look! We have got a gender pay gap denier in here! This world is still going by this rule of thumb: If a girl wants to stop getting harassed at the club, she should get a boyfriend. Think about the implication of this statement then revise your third opinion. After all, Ana may fool everyone, but that's built on the assumption that she "has" a rich dad wasn't it?
@@onebrokegirl3864 First of all, I have the right to speak, isn't that the case in a democracy? You can disagree, but you can't ask me to revise or ban my speech.
Second, the question is "Does it have to be rich dad or it has to be a boy?" You can't deny that there are great women, like: Virginia Marie Nicosia, Mary Teresa Barra, Abigail Pierrepont Johnson, you can't deny that these people exist ,are these all relying on rich dad? Can't it be relying on rich mother? "Men in the workplace have advantages in the workplace." I don't deny this, there is progress, but it can be better, but does it have to be rich dad or I don't agree with being a man, isn't this denying the upper-class women in the film?
At last, I would like to clarify that I have not stated my position, I have just put forward a different point of view, your definition is just your personal misunderstanding to me, if it isn’t that those who support you are all enemies, then I think I haven't a way to communicate with you.
@@ruei7873 It's not that I have an misunderstanding, but it's your "point of view" is completely rhetorical because it has epically failed to address the real experience of most women in real life AT THE MOMENT. Sure it's you're freedom to express anything, but the ignorance and privileged attitude of such "point of view" is appalling.
You might think you're just making an innocent, logical argument, but there's people living this shit right here, right now. And this sad truth would predictably still hold true in the next two decades. So your opinion are actually expressing "Why can't women just be happy that a few of them have been granted the privilege of the men? It could have been none! Eventually it'll be others' turn, perhaps it'll take another centruy but can't they just be patient? Why do they must make us look bad and guilt tripping men?"
About the inherting richness from a mother or denying the upper class women, what have mistaken what truly made Ana or their success. It's not the money but status, so unless their mother is the Queen of England, their success or privilege are still inherited from a male family member. Plus that's also under the premise where there's not a King. Think about the Korean richest family, would the princess of Samsung still able to be in the position where she is now if she not only has one brother but three instead?
I don't blame you for your ignorance, cus just like women doesn't how painful it actually is if man got their balls kicked, you probably have never applied a job or joining a workplace as a female. To fill in that knowledge gap, perhaps you can check out some transgender talking about what have change to their career. Almost all transmen have claimed it became easier to get an offer or promotion, and transwomen have experience the opposite, getting an offer or career advancement has became more difficult compare to when they were male.
@@onebrokegirl3864
Uh... you still don't get what I'm talking about...
In response to the current social situation, I just mentioned the second item in the message. I understand the current workplace ecology problem, and I also know that regulations and national education need to be improved. Taking the Republic of China as an example, even if we set an equality treaty for women, there will still be supervisors. Taking advantage of legal loopholes to suppress female employees, it is obvious that concepts and values need to be re-educated, but this is to improve the laws and introduce correct gender into the education system, rather than cursing the symptoms but not the root cause.
As for whether there will be improvement in the next 20 years, how to determine? Suppose the case I gave became a "rich mother" and gave resources to the next generation (assuming girls), wouldn't it be true? And I'm talking about women's success stories. I want to put forward another perspective to see things. How can we talk if you are not at this level?
You say women should satisfy a few men to give them the chance to succeed? I didn't say that, I made it very clear that we are not the parties, and there is no way to be sure that they are using the resources of men, not to mention that I premise that "they worked hard for themselves", in order to affirm their achievements, you want I've been "misunderstanding" or "applying your life tragedy", I really can't communicate with you.
In Anna's case, I just want to say, isn't the point that you don't need to rely on "rich dad", but only rely on funds and her personal plan to succeed? Otherwise, would the outstanding women beside him depend on men? Can you be sure that they do not rely on complete plans and capital to attract investment?
@@ruei7873 oh dear, 飽妮's explanation has just flew over you head! First of all, I wasn't instituting "my life tragedy" in the last comment. All women experience these kind of microaggression that men or even women themselves don't notice. Who formed the ecosystem of work? Human, all genders. Laying out the systematic problems, dehumanising the problems is the root cause of why this insufficient communication. You don't realise it don't you? You only know all about unfairness on paper, you even able to write an essay about it (which you sorta did), but you don't truly understand the consequence or reality of these unfairness. To women, your perspective is as old as the babyboomers. Such unfairness is so distance to you, you only understand the good properties so you can only call a celebration to that and downplay the bad properties. It's the same mindset of the Chinese saying why you have to look at the bad news of China, can't you just and solely talk about the good news? Problems is the good and bad are inseparable. When discribing a picture one can't just describe a corner and say that's a good picture.
What I simply saying is, when you think about gender inequality, you can't just discuss it on paper, on surface, you can't start off the thinking process from men's perspective (which you did) but you gotta start off as a woman.
Just think about it, if Anna didn't claimed she has a "rich dad", but she has a "rich mom", could she still be as sucess? Maybe, only maybe, and it would take her double or triple efforts to achieve the same achievement. And eventually people will be asking where does her mom's money came from until they got a man's name, which will be that man's name be the ultimate pinnacle that allow her to get the sponsor and success. And people will remember her connection with that man's name, not her mother. So, does her complete plan and intelligent gain her eventual sucess? Yes. Does her success rely on these and other factors as not important? No.
除了在講述Anna這個人外，也提到了很多美國的不同面向，女權、政治、黑人..等等，我很喜歡女記者去找Anna爸媽時，媽媽說的話：「大部分的人都會覺得有其父必有其子，就像你們覺得我們一定也是什麼騙錢的人，但我們不是。」
而且我到現在還是耿耿於懷安娜說的那句：「要錢很容易，最好得到錢的方式就是對方為你抱有愛、愧疚，那是最有用的。」
至於後來她在哭我都會懷疑，這是真的嗎？
很多劇情都描繪的很細膩，劇裡的每個人對於Anna都有執著，都有自己的故事，喜歡死伯利亞一直默默幫助Vivian，在她激動時要她冷靜下來!
飽妮今天的妝也太美了吧！！
看完馬上來看飽妮解說
最後一幕演員看著鏡頭那裡有creepy 到
但整個故事是真的很扯，又很吸引人
感覺飽妮也可以試試分析經典的故事
像是 傲慢與偏見 之類的^^
喜歡看這部影集的原因不是安娜有多會騙人，劇情剪輯、 拍攝、配樂都是想繼續看下去的原因
等好久終於有人做這部的影片了 而且飽妮講的好讚
之前飽妮介紹提到這部的時候就很有興趣 剛才看完第一集 真的超級好看！！！大家演技都超好 Julia Garner的氣場太讚了吧⋯⋯明天繼續來追❤️🔥💥
Anna有些角度超正的，但某些角度有看起來超普通
假髮讓我出戲😂😂
最好笑是後面還真的直接被說髮質需要去護髮😂😂
突然想到台灣的黃琪，也偽裝身分騙到很多名人😲
林秉輸也騙了很多人
Anna is delusional! 從劇裡面看到的就是只要你擺闊 人家就會以為你口袋麥寇麥寇 其他的就是無限的畫大餅 遇到問題先發制人把別人指責一通
現實就是沒有如果💀她真的就是有事
用性別議題開脫真的太超過了
騙子就是騙子.拿夢想當幌子.就算4000萬元貸下來.這個基金會一樣做不成.就如同劇中說過的Fyre音樂節的結果一樣!主角記者很明顯因為安娜的故事題材讓他一雪前恥.從谷底翻身!進而產生斯德哥爾摩症候群.而對安娜產生同情心的好感!整部戲根本就是在幫安娜洗白美化她的謊言.難怪現實的瑞秋對此劇深感不滿!
手怎麼了QQ
期待飽妮之後可以介紹最近很紅的euphoria （不想用台灣的譯名，很接地氣
真的对Anna又爱又恨😂 最后一集的时候本该是让我热血澎湃，宣布Anna的判刑结果时，希望Anna可以洗脱那十项罪名，但是希望他洗脱罪名的时候又希望他可以被定罪，因为他真的犯罪了啊😂
或許華爾街對女性真的比較不友善,但其實如果就算安娜是男生,如果只是普通中產也不可能貸款到兩千萬美金的,這部分比較像是安娜自己的詭辯,如果要討論性別問題記者的例子更好,為何女性在職場可容錯的空間比較小,至於安娜的狀況主要是階級問題吧,中產階級男性如果要貸款兩千萬美金創業的唯一方式也是詐欺
剛追完就等到飽妮發片(開心真的很喜歡這部呢！好看❤
我自己看完影片是覺得 沒有什麼假如 騙錢沒成功這樣而已 什麼假如他是男人 …不懂
我也覺得 女權是假議題 在這部裡面純粹是安娜唬人的手段之一
現實版的安娜已經在2021年2月被假釋囉....本來在2019年被判4~12年徒刑,關不到2年就假釋.
然後在服刑時賣自己的故事,拍這部電影還賺了200萬美金.
付清賠償的錢還淨賺100多萬美金,
美國的高級詐欺犯也是蠻爽的.
已假釋 但現在是因為非法滯留美國而又被拘留🤣
我們詐騙集團國應該也不遑多讓
昨天才在查怎麼飽妮沒有這部的觀後心得,
沒想到今天就上了! 哈哈!
跟別人說一千次 我老爸是有錢人!! 也不會有人信!! 但安娜就是可以!!
假如安娜是男人，就變成Tinder大騙徒
就算安娜是白人男性，也會和法蘭克·艾巴內爾（《神鬼交鋒》Catch Me If You Can）一樣被抓被關
不過法蘭克後來就進入FBI工作了，還找了（當年還很嫩的）李奧納多來演他耶！感覺這下場比安娜好蠻多的～
李奧納多後來去接的 華爾街之狼 也是啊! 就是 騙到出名了 還找了大咖來演自己 自己還去當製片 甚至還客串咧! 所以 李奧 是 騙王的代言人嗎? xd
莫須有不是這樣子用的
其實就炒作而已,真的進法庭,犯罪所得就20萬美元,6萬還是騙打工人的Rachel, 考慮到台美物價,這相當於在台灣詐騙100多萬台幣,緬北路上隨便一個詐騙份子都可能超過這金額
這邊極度推薦一部神劇叫做，我的天才女友
安娜是2021年年初出狱的
飽妮的眉毛畫的好好看喔～～（搞錯本片重點🤣
我只想問這部劇到底多討厭川普 從頭調侃到尾
看完這部再追完黑錢勝地，Julia Garner演技真的很棒
她可惜就可惜在沒有真的憑實力去華爾街打滾
作為一個有野心有報復卻沒有支撐其的條件的人，是件很難過的事
如果是男性，如果是富二代，如果……
他的角色真的塑造的很成功欸
抱歉但我第一眼看到影片封面以為是HowHow
其實這個事件的骨架很像是一個網路上流傳很久的笑話的翻版，一個年輕商人去跟比爾蓋茲說他是銀行副總想當他的女婿，然後再去銀行面試說是比爾蓋茲的女婿，然後他就變成比爾蓋茲的女婿跟銀行副總了。
其實如果熟悉早期台灣很流行的“標會”跟一些被倒會的故事，就會知道這個故事背後的運作方式了，簡單講就是先標一個會，然後骨牌式的標其他會，最後如果都沒倒，那就得利，如果其中一個骨牌倒了，就跟這女主一樣了，不過通常都是跑路而不是被抓。
既然你已经知道发生什么事，有没有想过做点什么改变这一现象？
比如说曝光阴谋黑幕，让好人警觉，坏人收敛。
這部一推出就立即一口氣看完了🤓
主創是「格雷的解剖學」的主創
感覺更期待女版賈伯斯的影集了
裡面演懷孕記者的戲外名字才是叫安娜，她是和小鬼當家演過My GIRL的童星ruclips.net/video/KSyKO0Lklmo/видео.html
飽妮ㄉ霧眉真的很好看😍
本人看起來更偏執古怪一點，影集版本長相太好看友善了
毫無意外地想到《華爾街之狼》與《詐欺女王》
我的天 我才剛看完 也太剛好！
好扯😱😱
祝飽妮的手早日痊愈.
就是貪字⋯那些高知識真的是丟臉
我身邊有一位比安娜更誇張的
能當華爾街的男人，真好
忽然想到台灣的黃琪
年紀輕輕 冒充名人到處騙錢。
連股市名媛 何麗玲也被他唬住。
陳水扁先生當面讓他算命。
其實真正有錢人，多半低調
怕別人覬覦他的錢財。
想看你做一个迪士尼库伊拉电影的视频
我還沒看完這個劇，但是她已經出獄了嗎？！
飽妮好美
記者演得很討厭，看得很辛苦
來了來了!!!!!!!
飽妮晚安！！
這次打扮好成熟喔！！
社會的良善就是被這些人摧毀的。
饱妮的手受伤了吗，心疼。
來了來了新影片來了！！！❤️看一波波！
来了来了 0.o
这个女的应该是有妄想症，而不是说什么想创业。影片的这句话很有意思，由“真实人物改编除了虚构的部分。”请问哪一个部分事件人物是虚构的。故事好看看怎么编站在什么角度说，这个人褒义贬义不同的人看似不一样的。
虽然说是纪录片，但是并不能完全揭示事物的事实，只能当作戏剧来看看完之后是羡慕这个人聪明，巧舌如簧？表扬还是说惊讶，这个骗子太牛逼了，还是说骗子就是骗子，不能让看故事的人，认为是一个正能量。或者是说今天世界就是这样操作的。
大马也是有杨宝贝事件，很扯淡
影集裡裡面最討厭的是瑞秋，佔盡便宜
超好看的🤣🤣🤣
安娜是我的偶像🤩 女人就該心狠手辣冰雪聰明，太颯了！
？？？
你是反串還是認真這樣想？
@@ruei7873 怎麼？男騙子可以有粉絲女騙子不能啊？
呃...我何時說過我支持tinder的當事人？
@@떡이-m2b 妳看完你覺得認同我無法說什麼，只是想了解你的論述是以什麼出發而已