I am trying to read this for my class this semester and wanted to throw myself into oncoming traffic after the first few pages (LOL). Thank god I found this video. It is helping me grasp what my mind can not comprehend from reading.
This is ridiculously good content. What you cover thoroughly, interestingly, and more importantly, coherently, in just 20 minutes is amazing. Thank You !!
With regards to war, an understanding of human nature, with the help of Hobbes, leads us to conclude that humans need "war", it makes us feel alive, like we have relevance and meaning. Only by sublimating our instincts into safer forms of warfare, such as war games, sports etc. can this desire for war be worked off in a healthy way.
...another "safe" form of warfare, is accumulation of capital. Though obviously through moral means. If somebody deems you have attained capital through unfair or immoral means, then they will wage war on you.
Sounds badass and all but I truly doubt most modern westerners have such desire when the majority doesn't practice sports or such activities at all, and do you believe this also applies to women when historically they've practised very very little warfare? Hobbes himself based his thoughts around the patriarchal world order of his time.
@@tensevo Personally I find that as a bit of a stretch since I wouldn't link normal human activities directly to a thirst of war but respect for still answering after two years
This is great, thank you! My partner is about to undertake this as mandated reading so I wanted a quick but deep understanding as she likes to use me as a sounding board. Great content!
This is a very nice analysis, currently taking a PoliSci course and Leviathan is the text we’re on at the moment, this has helped provide an overview to coincide with the readings themselves. Good job on the video!
This video was helped me greatly in grasping the ideas put forth in the Leviathan. Thank you! Your summary is brilliantly eloquent and became a great tool in my writing of a university paper on the matter. Thanks again
All I can say is thank you, good sir. That was simply, the most cohesive, coherent, fluid, and above all, comprehendible video about philosophy I have witnessed. You navigated the material exquisitely, where and by illustrating certain points of note and then recycling them back into the interpretation you're demonstrating. I tip my hat to you, good sir, thank you so much for such wonderful and educational content. I have subscribed!
so glad you mentioned you are a professor so i can be confident this video will accurate. thanks for this video, h have a much better understanding of how influential Hobbs really is in our modern world.
Government by Consent is Government for Group Identity: 1. Government by consent is only possible by sympathetic relations between governments and their subjects. 2. The cause of oppression is a lack of a sympathetic relation between governments and their subjects. 3. Sympathy between governments and their subjects is only possible by shared intentions. 4. Popular intention is expressed by support for institutions of ideology, politics, religion, culture, language, race and economics. 5. Institutions have the primary function of maintaining, uplifting and saving a group identity. 6. Group identity is freely chosen by people with shared intentions. 7. Shared intentions arise out of desire, want, need and necessity. 8. Government by consent is government for a specific group identity.
This video just saved my essay, and more importantly, solved all doubts i had about Hobbes since i first listened to his theory! you're a great teacher!
James, I am not sure if you know but we once had a prime minister with the last name Muldoon and he was a very controversial figure. Very authoritarian and he was a strong supporter of Keynesianism.
We derive our appetites and aversions mostly from others, we want what somebody else has, we reject what others reject, to the extent we can control our "desires", and simultaneously convince others to control their "desires", is the extent we can avert conflict.
A sovereign power can only be in one place at one time. The larger the society the more ridiculous and unfair that society will become. A sovereign power can only exist fairly in a small group of individuals who are known to one another such as in a tribe of 100 individuals or less.
Can you please make a commentary on Han Feizi or even the entire philosophy of Legalism (China)? I would love to hear your thoughts about the book. Thank you
Who would think that every individual, including the "sovereign", pursues only his own ends. Who would think it is a bad idea to concentrate the sovereignty into few central institutions and call it the state - the legitimate garantor of all you have. People do bad when they are not coerced to do good, so let the most unscrupulous and wicked rule us to make us good. Give power to those with highest appetite for domination, so we can be moral down there... Hobbesian notion of entering social contract out of fear of being crushed by the "sovereign" is really fantastic. You don't have to voltunarily enter the contract, the fact that you didn't burn down the local magistrate is evidence enough for your agreement with the contract. Simply fantastic notion.
Hobbes' notion seems a lot like China's old Mandate of Heaven, where the ruler is decided through agreement (not rebelling means implicit agreement). Down to the part where being able to join a rebellion means that the sovereign has lost the right to enforce the contract, therefore rebellion becomes a just cause. It worked for China for over 5000 years, so doesn't seem that unrealistic.
I love the way you explain the topic. Your voice is clear and it really helps me more in understanding Thomas Hobbes's works. THANKS A LOT SIR!! (0//W//
well done mate. there are many empty videos with millions Sub and views like override foods by car and other meaningless videos but your best videos got only 14k Subs. this is the end of meaningful and valuable Human. I hate the post modern Human.
"...but, there's also an incredibly utopian aspect to this project." I have had my suspicions that he was demon possessed, but that statement completely settles the matter in my mind.
May I ask, on which page is Hobbes quote (in 16:05 minutes) in Leviathan? "To resist a sovereign is to commit an act of injustice but once a group of men have begun resisting to join this group is no longer to commit an act of further injustice".
I love that he was like "it us terrible to rebel, but maybe there are certain circumstances in ehich you could," and his contemporaries lost their minds over this authoritarian take. Lol
I would argue that in a "healthy" state there should be an open dialogue between the church and the state, neither being sub-ordinate to the other. Think of the church being the side of unknown unknown and the state being on the side of the known, or order. The church should be a safe space or place where ppl can discuss where the state is going wrong or become immoral. In turn, the church will be a check and balance on where the state is becoming immoral or depraved.
This is the absolute best explanation on the subject I could find. Great work!
Absolute sleeper of a channel!
A sovereign floater you don't even need that one
@@JohnDoe-sp3dc xhhgz22z 0:20 2d,
@@JohnDoe-sp3dc xhhgz22z 0:20 2d,
I am trying to read this for my class this semester and wanted to throw myself into oncoming traffic after the first few pages (LOL). Thank god I found this video. It is helping me grasp what my mind can not comprehend from reading.
This is ridiculously good content.
What you cover thoroughly, interestingly,
and more importantly, coherently,
in just 20 minutes is amazing.
Thank You !!
With regards to war,
an understanding of human nature, with the help of Hobbes, leads us to conclude
that humans need "war", it makes us feel alive, like we have relevance and meaning.
Only by sublimating our instincts into safer forms of warfare, such as war games, sports etc. can this desire for war be worked off in a healthy way.
...another "safe" form of warfare, is accumulation of capital. Though obviously through moral means. If somebody deems you have attained capital through unfair or immoral means, then they will wage war on you.
Interesting take
Sounds badass and all but I truly doubt most modern westerners have such desire when the majority doesn't practice sports or such activities at all, and do you believe this also applies to women when historically they've practised very very little warfare? Hobbes himself based his thoughts around the patriarchal world order of his time.
@@TodayNot competition, attention seeking, money stacking, is all war games analog
@@tensevo Personally I find that as a bit of a stretch since I wouldn't link normal human activities directly to a thirst of war but respect for still answering after two years
This is the best channel for political philosophy ❤️
Just started reading the book. This video will be a good helper in understanding it. Thank you!
This is great, thank you! My partner is about to undertake this as mandated reading so I wanted a quick but deep understanding as she likes to use me as a sounding board. Great content!
This is a very nice analysis, currently taking a PoliSci course and Leviathan is the text we’re on at the moment, this has helped provide an overview to coincide with the readings themselves. Good job on the video!
Keep 'em coming, these explanations are amazing
thank you for this video. I have been preparing for an exam and this helped me tremendously in my understanding.
Thank you warry much for the video. I'm studying Philosophy and your videos help me understand the subject.
The way concepts are explained is absolutely great!
A script of the video would be really appreciated:)
Thank you!
This video was helped me greatly in grasping the ideas put forth in the Leviathan. Thank you! Your summary is brilliantly eloquent and became a great tool in my writing of a university paper on the matter. Thanks again
Just stumbled upon your channel - what excellent, and concise explanations!
You deserve far more views than that!
this video really helped me understand Hobbes. Thank you so much!
All I can say is thank you, good sir. That was simply, the most cohesive, coherent, fluid, and above all, comprehendible video about philosophy I have witnessed. You navigated the material exquisitely, where and by illustrating certain points of note and then recycling them back into the interpretation you're demonstrating. I tip my hat to you, good sir, thank you so much for such wonderful and educational content. I have subscribed!
Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge; a beautiful piece that sums up and raises great points about Hobbes' work
This is very important in the US right now. We are in a battle of reason vs conspiracy.
Critique of Pure Reason is a book by the German philosopher Immanuel Kant, in which the author seeks to determine the limits and scope of metaphysics.
This.... is phenomenal. You sir have won another subscriber.
Subscribed. You're gonna help me pass the semester.
so glad you mentioned you are a professor so i can be confident this video will accurate. thanks for this video, h have a much better understanding of how influential Hobbs really is in our modern world.
Thanks for this. Going to reference you for my dissertation
Government by Consent is Government for Group Identity:
1. Government by consent is only possible by sympathetic relations between governments and their subjects.
2. The cause of oppression is a lack of a sympathetic relation between governments and their subjects.
3. Sympathy between governments and their subjects is only possible by shared intentions.
4. Popular intention is expressed by support for institutions of ideology, politics, religion, culture, language, race and economics.
5. Institutions have the primary function of maintaining, uplifting and saving a group identity.
6. Group identity is freely chosen by people with shared intentions.
7. Shared intentions arise out of desire, want, need and necessity.
8. Government by consent is government for a specific group identity.
This video just saved my essay, and more importantly, solved all doubts i had about Hobbes since i first listened to his theory! you're a great teacher!
Hobbes figured it out really well... and without even having the internet 😮
James, I am not sure if you know but we once had a prime minister with the last name Muldoon and he was a very controversial figure. Very authoritarian and he was a strong supporter of Keynesianism.
We derive our appetites and aversions mostly from others,
we want what somebody else has,
we reject what others reject,
to the extent we can control our "desires", and simultaneously convince others to control their "desires", is the extent we can avert conflict.
thank you for posting, helped me so much is my political thought class
massive massive respect for this vid...such a crucially informative vid...but LMAO didnt see that coming 3:12
I flinched hard
Excellent teachings.
Highly quality work, well done!
A sovereign power can only be in one place at one time. The larger the society the more ridiculous and unfair that society will become. A sovereign power can only exist fairly in a small group of individuals who are known to one another such as in a tribe of 100 individuals or less.
Can you please make a commentary on Han Feizi or even the entire philosophy of Legalism (China)? I would love to hear your thoughts about the book. Thank you
This is really comprehensive ! Very helpful
So much commitment to the subject that you shaved off part of your beard to do the segments with the Hobbes quotes! 😂
Thanks for this great piece
You've helped a lot of students like me! Thank you!!
Very well done! Excellent summary. Thank you.
Thank you, professor.
Who would think that every individual, including the "sovereign", pursues only his own ends. Who would think it is a bad idea to concentrate the sovereignty into few central institutions and call it the state - the legitimate garantor of all you have. People do bad when they are not coerced to do good, so let the most unscrupulous and wicked rule us to make us good. Give power to those with highest appetite for domination, so we can be moral down there...
Hobbesian notion of entering social contract out of fear of being crushed by the "sovereign" is really fantastic. You don't have to voltunarily enter the contract, the fact that you didn't burn down the local magistrate is evidence enough for your agreement with the contract. Simply fantastic notion.
Hobbes' notion seems a lot like China's old Mandate of Heaven, where the ruler is decided through agreement (not rebelling means implicit agreement). Down to the part where being able to join a rebellion means that the sovereign has lost the right to enforce the contract, therefore rebellion becomes a just cause.
It worked for China for over 5000 years, so doesn't seem that unrealistic.
“Hell is truth seen too late”
Thomas Hobbes
I love the way you explain the topic. Your voice is clear and it really helps me more in understanding Thomas Hobbes's works. THANKS A LOT SIR!! (0//W//
Never read this book, but I’d like to
Impressive, and genuinely helpful.
awesome job thank you so much for helping me understand this you freaking genius.
Great video.
Thank you! 👏👏
well done mate. there are many empty videos with millions Sub and views like override foods by car and other meaningless videos but your best videos got only 14k Subs. this is the end of meaningful and valuable Human. I hate the post modern Human.
Good stuff !
this is incredible! thank you thank you
Right on
bor you just wrote my paper for me, thank you so much !!!!!
What was Hobbes conception of the highest good?
"...but, there's also an incredibly utopian aspect to this project."
I have had my suspicions that he was demon possessed, but that statement completely settles the matter in my mind.
Kudos
I love this
Very good content.
Sir
What is "The end of obedience in protection " -hobbes
"Homo humini lupus.... "
Please comment.
Thank you this is great!
May I ask, on which page is Hobbes quote (in 16:05 minutes) in Leviathan?
"To resist a sovereign is to commit an act of injustice but once a group of men have begun resisting to join this group is no longer to commit an act of further injustice".
It's not a quote
Great video!
I love that he was like "it us terrible to rebel, but maybe there are certain circumstances in ehich you could," and his contemporaries lost their minds over this authoritarian take.
Lol
I would argue that in a "healthy" state there should be an open dialogue between the church and the state, neither being sub-ordinate to the other.
Think of the church being the side of unknown unknown and the state being on the side of the known, or order.
The church should be a safe space or place where ppl can discuss where the state is going wrong or become immoral.
In turn, the church will be a check and balance on where the state is becoming immoral or depraved.
Church is often immoral and depraved
wonderful!
great work
Thank you!!!
Interesting. Thanks
What is the name of the movie being shown of children being stranded on an island. Living in a "state if nature"? 🙄
Hobbes the securalist!
Lord of the Flies
The black and white movie... is it lord of the flies?
I believe so. Quite creative tbh since the idea of the state of nature relates to the book.
what movie is going on in the background?
Scott Potter I think it was metropolis
There’s a few movies in the background, metropolis and lord of the flies are some
Great job dear, nis interpretation and narration...thankss
thanks a lot
❤❤❤
Hobbs was moving through Finnegan’s Wake
can i get the script of this video please ?
Can I get a script of this vedio please.
No loitering in thy Universe. We need others of like minded Holographic Human Mind’s Eyes
Acoustic Sacred Geometrical Rod’s & Cones Human Behavioral Modification by a Benevolent Leviathan to stabilize the Herd!
MWM@
Points for the wig.
The Benevolent Leviathan is about meeting the needs of the z herds
Slay
Jajaja when the guy is dressed like Hobbes
Walker Paul Hernandez Barbara Jones Kenneth
I guess he failed, war persists.