Space Marine 2 - MASSIVE NEW CONTENT FAQ! BIG QUESTIONS ANSWERED!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 сен 2024
- We just got a brand new Space Marine 2 FAQ dedicated to some of the biggest questions that we the fans have asked the developers, from Balance to new content for the game! THIS IS HUGE!
If you enjoy my content and want to support me please consider on becoming a channel member! For the Emperor!
/ @chaptermastervalrak
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hobby Affiliates (Upto 20% off Warhammer Products)
HOBBY WORKSHOP (UK) ►► www.hobbyworks...
ELEMENT GAMES (UK) ►► elementgames.c...
BROAD SWORD (EU)►► tinyurl.com/3w...
WarGamePortal (USA) ►► wargameportal....
Other Affiliates
AMAZON LINK ►► amzn.to/3cycL3I
OVERLCOCKERS ►► bit.ly/2L56BqX
Other ways to support
MERCH ►► teespring.com/...
PATREON ►► goo.gl/LQmgGt
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My social media links:
goo.gl/FCMdbd
/ discord
/ cmvalrak
/ cmvalrak
/ valrak40k
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#warhammer #warhammer40k #horusheresy #40k #gamesworkshop #40k rumours #valrak
All images, miniatures, or any other trademarks (other than our own) are either ®, TM, and/or © to their respective company owners. Used without permission. No challenge to their status intended. All Rights Reserved to their respective owners.
Bulwark banner needs Chapter specific banners.
Agreed. I think the customization should include actually choosing your chapter. So any future features that may represent your marine actually includes that stuff.
i heard this champion pack dark angel will be for bulwark so if banner will be dark angels maybe they will do it for others
Or at least make it a generic Imperial one.
@@FanimusMaximus Generic imperial is prolly better tbh
I want a salamander banner o.o
FYI: I-frames are "invincibility frames", they're mostly meant to prevent a player (or enemy) getting stun locked to death or to allow to evade attacks. A great example is the roll in Dark Souls.
Better example here would be Executions ^^
I’d argue either give gun strikes s or have the ability to turn them off for higher difficulties. Several times I’ve tried to shoot my melta at a warrior, only to accidentally get locked into shooting a pistol at a minor gribbly and taking more damage than it’s worth.
@simonlarge2052 Weird, considering sometimes it just shoots with my main weapon and ignores the gun strike. I usually switch to my pistol to do it because I thought I had to
I-frames is a word that someone invented, like its a thing. Probably some console player that cant even see fps in games.
@@exeverrr it's a term used in the videogame industry, by developers.
11:30 I think you've misunderstood what the devs mean when they explain decisions with "because lore". What they're trying to tell you (subtly, without pissing GW off) is that they've been told by GW leadership to treat the IP with some extremely narrow restrictions in some cases. They're trying to quietly explain that they would probably do it, but *someone* is telling them no.
I don't understand why GW(the owners of Warhammer) would have to keep it a secret that they don't want someone ruining their lore. Like why would they not be able to say "yeah we almost did something not lore friendly and GW corrected us" like why would it be a conspiracy?
@@grondunn9707it’s absolutely GW they have done this with WHTW for a decade. It’s not a conspiracy they are just being respectful to the IP owner because they want to keep it. It would look bad internally if devs were blaming GW publicly for limitations.
@@grondunn9707 Because for a lot of the things they want to stop or reign in it would make them look petty and put them in a bad light.
@@grondunn9707 bc it's safer that way and they don't wanna get sued into oblivion if they accidentally say too much
Yes, but there is no real lore restriction to classes. Are you telling me Iron Warriors can't use shields? Are you saying there's no Black Legion raptors? There's no Night Lords with bolters? The dev response of no World Eaters with snipers is horse shit. Khorne does not care how the blood flows, so long as it flows. Nah, the lore answer is a cop out. If GW is legit stopping them then GW doesn't know their own lore.
Lightening claws would be so cool!
Most answers to any questions there were like "We are working on it,but its gonna take some time". Trust me,you are not getting that anytime soon.
ravenguard intensifies
AVE DOMINUS NOX
I want the battle axe to come back I loved that thing in the first game
Lightning claws what are you a cat person lol just picking
Leave my Heavy alone! The poor guy constantly gets domed by Assault and Bulwark. The power is balanced by increasingly worse accuracy.
As I fellow Heavy player, I agree.
I too agree
As an Assault player, get Dom'd, nerd
Thats why you use the Las Fusil!
I concur brother!
I hope among the new customization features it lets us change the robe colors.
It must be a thing they can do, since the deathwatch at the beginning have red robes so hopefully it's just a matter of them making ui for it.
bro those little things take lot of times and some times creates lots of bugs in the game, lets hope we get some sort of DLC for salamander lore or someting.
@@TheBacktohell yeah those little things like robe colors take time and could cause bugs so lets add an entire dlc about a chapter thats not in the game, makes sense.
@TheBacktohell love salamanders but expecting anything but ultramarines for story dlc is just not gonna happen
Imagine a DLC where Titus goes to the Pariah Nexus and teams up with Sa'kan @@TheBacktohell
Anytime they say something about class identity or lore based reasons as to why cosmetics wont be more widely used across classes all i hear is "GW wont let us, those pricks dont want u to have as much fun as we can give u"
This probably the main reason yes
As a PvP player I think no buffs, no nerfs. Let it roll. Just give us chaos customization and toggle for crossplay. That’s it, that’s all we need.
And ranked or leaderboards
@@CYNRexo No ranked. We don't need this game getting too sweaty.
@@brandonm9378 dont play rank when they add it then
@@brandonm9378 lol then don’t play ranked continue to play pubs
Let parties stun bulwark. That infinite sword combo is stupid and there's no way out of it
Bold of GW to talk about lore restrictions when they've been "progressing" the lore the past couple years
Bold of you to lambast the lore “progressing” when the lore you’re ‘defending’ isn’t even the _original_ version…
It’s an excuse. The weapons thing is an excuse. The fov slider, shoulder swap, health regen, etc, etc, etc…
@@nightshadeii9248Woke shit sucks. Womp womp.
@@nightshadeii9248Woke stuff sucks. Womp womp womp.
I was playing operations with a bot team, I had an assault bot that would stand still and watch as the tyranid right beside him would call in reinforcements.
I’ve had the same thing it’s very frustrating
Or when the bots sometimes just end up using their pistol the whole time :(
@@yaacheese8643 lol, I haven't seen that yet, but I am sure I will.
One neurothrope spawn in my operation playthrough and it was a pain in the ass. Got myself overwhelmed by warriors and gaunts while my bot team keeps getting stagger by the neurothrope's attack wave. Took forever for the bots to revive myself and get myself run over by tyranids again. It was on Average Difficulty btw.
God forbid we see a sniper world eater. Meanwhile there are 6 skittle marines in my team. Good one.
Warhammer has always allowed people to invent their own chapters, ie painting your minis whatever color you want. But the World Eaters would never Snipe or go Invisible, they’d find it cowardly and disrespectful to Khorne.
You realize it takes time to make content right? There's 6 classes and 6 Chaos legions between them, that's 36 sets of armor they still have to design and update unto the game. Multiply that by another 6 if you want each legion to have tiers of armor sets like loyalists, that's a ton of content.
And you can 6 skittle Marines on Chaos as well, you're just trying to make it seem like that has something to do with why there isn't armor sets. It's much easier to allow freedom of color than it is making completely unique armor sets.
@@yall_mightThat's 100% BS. Khorne doesnt care how the blood flows, so long as it flows. For a clear indicator of what should be allowed in traitor legions look at Horus Heresy. World Eaters have everything, heavy, scouts, snipers, jump troops, etc. It's a cop out answer. There's no justifiable lore reason to limit it.
I've got a fucking heavy class customized with blood angel colors with black Templar cross on his helm and black legion symbol on his shoulder. I think the lore is already right out the window
It’s honestly a crime I can’t have a cloak or cape on my wannabe Victrix Guard Bulwark. Should’ve given us 2 sets for Ultra edition, the current 4th Company one and a full Victrix set for Bulwark (shield included)
Also, the lore excuse they gave for Chaos is bs. SM1 had it just fine, regardless at least give us earnable sets for the Legion of the class then. The concept art for the Chaos side was way better and those armor sets should’ve just been earnable in game rather than scrapped altogether
This is something I can get behind. I also want to make a Victrix guard or hell even wear a cape on my tactical. The offical models have it as well so why can't we?
Bingo.
Yeah honestly the customization questions and answers really left a sour taste in my mouth, i know it’s likely GW but it still sucks.
As someone with a pretty extensive PvP background in other games, I love that the devs are sticking to the visual distinctions between classes. It’s so much more helpful than people realize, *especially* when abilities aren’t actively engaged
As far as the “lore” stuff. My understanding is that certain aspects are dictated by GW
Visual differences between classes already exist and will exist anyway, because everyone's equipment is different. There is no need to tie a class to the traitor legion. The loyalists are not bothered by the fact that all their classes by default are very similar to each other at a distance.
the first game never had a problem with this and you could have the same armour and skins for each class, its pretty easy to tell whos who when the difference is a MASSIVE FUCKING JETPACK ON THEIR BACK or a MASSIVE FUCKING HEAVY BOLTER IN THEIR HAND
@@LFXGamingExactly, the weapon profiles, shields, and other equipment already do enough to let you know what the enemy can do.
I think the problem just comes down to the devs seeing pvp as like a hardline try-hard Esports thing. The player base just sees it as fun and it's never gonna be a pro pvp.
@@АртёмШахов-ь4х Fr, the only thing i could see being confused is the vanguard getting mixed up with tactical maybe? But if you can't tell that a guy with a jump pack is a raptor or a guy with a shield is the bulwark then its sort of on you. World Eater bunny horns are really the thing that'd be confusing but everything else would be fine imo
Pink eye has returned
I really appreciate that the Devs can stick to their guns and say "no" when they have to, to the community. People being able to have 3 or more members of the same class on the same team would be a fucking NIGHTMARE for everyone else involved, and create stupid toxic metas. Same goes for the customization and visual clarity. Yes, I am always for more customization, but not to the detriment of gameplay.
Overhaul, their clarity, nuance, and willingness to stand their ground is making me quite a fan!
You’re the type that cheered for the Helldivers nerfs…
Overall*
The game just came out, not even a month and people are asking for so much lol geez
Exactly, lets just get the bugs fixed first then do the features!
We just got the burger!!! Now we are waiting for the fries!
@@sevenbutcher5729so you are yelling at the chef, flipping the table, yell at other customers until the restaurant has to close down so no one can have another burger and you scammed yourself out of your fries.
@@cirescythe i dont have blue hair and nose rings so no! Im not makin a fuzz about it!! Im just saying!
if they didnt release it unfinished then people wouldnt have to ask for features that should have been their from launch
I've been having a LOT of fun with it. Its a great sign when people just want more content to grind through as an excuse to play. They nailed the fun, just give us more things to do and level up. Maybe balance the health system a little better and buff a few things, but outside of that we just need more mission types, a true horde/defend waves mode, and more things to level up and unlock. Fantastic game, though I do feel it could have used another year in the oven.
Hard disagree on the one year more in the oven. They already had to delay for one year. Each month in development costs hundreds of thousands of dollars for one.
Second, they have an amazing foundation and now They are building on it with community feedback. Customers already contributed ideas and help shape future content. Do you want them to waste another year on content they have no way of knowing if people like it? Thats how you get a concord.
I'm halfway to max rank but they should add a prestige system. I have no issue replaying with basic equipment
@@cirescythe "That's how you get a concord" is not equal to "Delay Space Marine 2 a year". Concord failed because it was yet another bad Overwatch clone with bad art and zero sex appeal. Simple as.
You're talking out your ass for speculating on how a delay would impact them. A more polished fleshed out game will always lead to more sales, and there are other things that can set them up for future profits during the delay like iterating on content and future DLC up front. Many studios have done this.
I'm not saying its as dire as something like Cyberpunk was, I just feel like it would feel like a way more richer, feature complete game at launch, which is a nice thing when it rarely happens these days.
I'm not even fully against what we have now because its so fun. Just talking about options.
@@cirescythesounds like you’re just coping with the fact you’d have to wait another year before playing the game lol. “Hard disagree” 😂
Pink eye again?
I think the idea with the color palettes is that you need to unlock multiple different chapters to get the right color combinations as an extra progression gimmick.
Chaos characters need a default armor set that isn't specific to a Chaos faction for each class. That would be perfect 👌
I really really hope they add firstborn helmets. The Primaris helmets are cool but the helmet in the tutorial looks so good
im a bit of a new gen and while ive been interested, ive only really gotten into the lore and games post-Primaris and even i have to admit the firstborn gear and aesthetic is way better than the Primaris stuff, i would kill for that mark 8 Deathwatch gear to be in the pve
It would be cool but it would be a little wacky since you have firstborn armor on primaris which are physically different
@@ghost_1153Not necessarily, of the few dimensions that remain the same would be the helmet, pauldrons, and maybe the shin armor, but that would be about it
Someone farted on his pillow again smh
Chaplin and Agressor class would be Dope. And letting the Heavy use the Heavy Bolt Rifle would be mint. I want to play as a Heavy Intercessor
Their whole answer for not allowing legion changes to classes is a load of nonsense. Death Guard for example never have, and currently do not, use shields. Mortarion built the legion with no specialization in mind, being able to grind down any enemy with bolter fire, grenades, and knives as they approach. It is actually more lore accurate with them as tactical than Black Legion. Also, being able to identify the enemy's class? When I'm playing chaos I haven't the slightest clue what class the loyalists are playing because they've customized themselves to the gills. The statement just doesn't do it for me.
Yeah it just seems like since it's a lot of work they just didn't want to add it. Imo it doesn't even have to be as extensive as loyalists but let us get different ornaments and stuff to add on instead of full custom armor as a compromise would be cool
I love this game, but I've find myself often thinking about how that cancelled (or not cancelled but never planned) open beta could have helped. Maybe these issues would have already came up, and even if there wouldn't have been a solution by launch, we could still get them much closer to release.
Mustve been terrible for them to skip it then huh. Would've hurt sales if it looked too bad too close to release.
Also you’re so right about assault. Why it’s different baffles my mind, maybe so people won’t find glitches in the ops games mode lol
Probably worried about people leaving the map area but I think a “you’re leaving the combat area” warning before death is a fairly simple fix.
@@Inquisitor_Vex Yeah they definitely dont have that 10 seconds to return to battlefield thing implemented rn, i saw a video of a guy that got glitched out of the map at the bridge on decapitation and he fell like five levels of solid out of map platforms before he died so he could respawn
Yeah it's mostly to avoid abusing the mobility. The jump pack levels are designed around it but must of the games levels are not
Something to keep in mind. If the weapons that people think are "OP" are all unlocked after lots of play, that means the people using them are all people who have played a lot. It could just be an experience/skill issue and not really need balancing. (I'm not saying "get gud", just that hours of play naturally will make you slightly better)
Bruh, the meta gun is op because the idiots forgot to balance it. It does EVERYTHING better than any other gun/melee.
Skill? No. Time played. Yes.
@@TheDwarfishjoePerhaps the other weapons need to be buffed. lol Especially the plasma rifle. It’s strength 8 on the tabletop. I shouldn’t have to shoot a warrior or rubric twenty times in the face with supper heated plasma to execute/kill them.
@caseyanders1601 Yeah, that's what I was going for. I've only played like 2 hours of campaign, and 0 of PvP. Put me against bad, subpar players who have played a hundred hours and they'll likely beat me just because of their experience.
HAND DECALS! I will be able to be a crimson fist instead of a Crimson Arm!
@Chapter Master Valrak on the last QNA thing it's referring to during the gun strike animation people are requesting we become invincible like during executions. I- frames are called immunity frames and those are instances where any attack goes through you and doesn't deal damage. It's also how our Dodge works
Who's been farting on the pillows?
I'd really only change 2 things for PvP so far.
-Vanguard grapple should not* stun until they land the kick.
-Bulwark shield bash should stun enemies.
Other than that, it feels pretty balanced.
*Edited for clarity.
And parry should stun the attacker.
this is all fair changes I say
Vanguard grapple does stun the second it hits you. And it shouldnot, its op and cheap.
Vanguard grapple absolutely 'stuns' before the hit, as soon as the rope touches you the character shakes and cannot move.
@@RatchildUK yes 100% this is actually ejat I would change so people had a second to deal some damage. This should stop Headon assaults which are frankly cheesy
I want to play with different armors in PvE. The only option we have is the Primaris armor (MK10), but I would love to play with an old Space Marine armor, such as MK7 or even MK2. They can easily add more armor options to the game. The MK7 armor technically exists in the game (Deathwathc armor in the intro mission), and there is also a mod that makes you play with Deathwatch armor in the campaign. So it shouldn't be an issue, they can add it easily into the game.
@@BoşnakPanda I feel the same way, even just the MK7 helmet would be enough for me, sadly they really want to promote the Primaris. That's just the way it is I suppose
I would be willing to bet that will come later, but it's important to remember that GW is pushing primaris very hard. Personally, is love to see everything. I'm a huge fan girl for Mk III and Mk IV, but having some beakies, 5s, 7s, etc would be cool.
I highly doubt GW will let them
@@BattleBro77 I agree brother captain. It seems the MK7 armor will remain only in the original Space Marine (2011) and become a relic of the past, much like the miniature sets, an much like in the lore. The non primaris marines are a dying breed. Sad times brother captin.
Wouldn't be surprised if, as a first pass at least, they let us change our faces to other classes' faces. Likely that it won't be full-fledged face customization, at least at first.
@@radio-silence9506 Agreed, it would be fairly easy to implement as well as the faces are already modled and textured
Totally agree. Will vary the customisation a lot without changing much.
Then maybe further down the line let us make our own with some limitations to stop the stupid looking ones like in MORDHAU. lol
There was a ton of Chaos Marine customization in the first game, not just armor sets and colors, but also Chaos Champion designs that were unique. Now this game is different in that there are 6 classes instead of 3, and the sub-variants include different patterns of Mk X armor, but that's also another topic....
Would any Chaos Marines have power armor beyond say Mk IV or V? The World Eaters Vanguard in SM2 currently isn't wearing Mk X Phobos, and the Alpha Legion Sniper looks like it's wearing Mk V. So to your point Valrak, I don't see any limitations in the lore, especially since there's a great precedent to follow in how this was done in SM1 and all the "bones" are there for this to work in SM2 already.
100% agreed. The whole “lore” excuse is the most Bs thing ever. It was done before, and it was done well. “Lore accurate” but, its fine if my Deathguard Bulwark is painted in Khorne colors with Slanesh emblems.
The multiple-class fix could be pretty simple. The team bonuses apply to everyone except teammates with the same class as you. That way you avoid perks being stacked up, but individual and unique teammates still get the perk bonus. For example: Your team receives 20% contested health back on execute (disabled for other assault players on your team) That way people in ur team that dont play assault get your team bonus but not the 2nd assault
The whole class identity thing is honestly pretty stupid. Like the Bulwark will always have his shield, the assault will always have a big jump back, and the heavy will constantly be carrying around a big ass gun with an iron halo on his back regardless of how you customize them to look. The hardest class to make look difference would honestly be the Vanguard and even that can fixed by adding something that goes with the class that can be easily identified, but also experience has shown that this class identification also doesn't really matter.
What this reminds me of ultimately is how before Battlefield V released the devs were apprehensive about customization because it would ruin the silhouettes for each class only for customization to be added with Battlefield V and it not to matter at all and classes were still easy to identify just by how the other players played and by what weapons they used. I understand there are some stupid players but if Saber honestly thinks that most people would:
A. care about a World Eater sniper
B: Be unable to tell that the man with a big jump pack is an assault because he isn't a nightlord
Then they're pretty stupid themselves. Of course I'd rather see bugs fixed before customization expansions but this whole excuse they're using about lore and class identity is a really weak that doesn't hold up at all, especially when you consider Space Marine 1 had full customization for each side while also maintaining the ability to tell the differences of each of the three classes. And if it really is that hard, then they can easily make a system where when you aim at an enemy player and you see their health bar a small symbol appears over their head indicating their class! You know what game also did this? Battlefield. This is truly a nonissue that they are creating themselves.
A link to this very idea on Focus Together: community.focus-entmt.com/focus-entertainment/space-marine-2/ideas/4696
They don't want people to make a World Eater sniper or heavy for lore or gameplay reasons, but then they give the World Eater vanguard a combat knife as their melee weapon instead of their iconic chain axe...
Yeah makes sense.
The main argument against their class identity stance is the fact you can customise the loyalist marines. They either need to take away custimisation for loyalists in pvp or add it to chaos, because right now its ridiculous to make that claim when half the players directly refute it simply by exsisting in the match.
Dark Angels use cloaks too, i didnt know that they are all Snipers
Dark angles don't use cloaks for normal troopers, and they are very different from the cape on the sniper. The cloaks are largely worn by the higher level commanders or elite units. The majority of Dark Angels that wear cloaks focus on power sword usage, much like the bulwark that can currently already wear the hooded robes the DA wear.
Yes, but their should be cosmetic options for high ranking marines like the company veterans they are cloaked and use tactical marine weapons. So tactical should get a cloaked armor set too
50 memberships for another pair of glasses?
What has happened to your glasses now 😂
the foil needed a sacrifice
He realized the weakness of the flesh an decided to get some augmentations
No comment.
The one point I specifically hated the AI bots, was the early mission where you have to clear Tyranids off of the communications tower in four places. You're basically forced to scramble all over the place by yourself and clear them, because the bots will only shoot the bugs they have direct simple line of sight to. They won't move to objectives, and they wont ensure they're cleared completely. And you're doing this while there's enemies spawning all over the place on the ground too. It was infuriating how useless they were.
I need to be able to farm XP and upgrades when solo-playing Operations with bots on Xbox Series X.
I've lost nearly a dozen levels for finishing Operations with a pair of bots.
That's a total slap in the face.
I love playing with bots.
I'd prefer that I am able to keep my XP and gear after completing Operations solo...
Not too difficult to fix this.
Being able to run campaign missions in operations mode would be huge. It seems like there is a mod for this so devs should be able to add that fairly easy.
Bulwark when.
CoolRak when.
If you know; you know.
They can just add the class symbol next to the name tag and healthbar when you're looking directly at an enemy in pvp.
Don't really get that some classes are pretty obvious like the guy with a huge jumpack is obviously the assault and the person with the big ass gun is the heavy and the guy with the shield is bulwark.
Also how to tell if someone is sniper class
A. Turns invisible
B. Has bolt carbine
Sniper and Vanguard counter the heavy, how is that even an issue. It sounds like people are just running in over and over again meeting a heavy shooting them down, rather than flanking or not derping into them again and again. Other than that, a pretty fair analysis.
I was going to say the same thing. Vanguard is a direct counter to the bulwark, sniper counters heavy.
@robertwood9572 if there was a ranking system like halo for instance, I think it would sort out the various skill issues for players
How tf sniper counters the heavy?! You can't even kill them in 1 headshot. You shoot once, take half their health, then they turn on their shield and you go respawn.
@over9000lord because they are sitting ducks when shooting, and they dont always have sheild on.
@@UKAndrewL heavies still easily wreck snipers as they reload their rifles. Or roll away to get their shield up. This all would work if sniper had a 1 hit head shot. I really can't wrap my head around why it doesn't.
I bet that the lore restrictions come down from GW on high, if I had to take a guess. They've mentioned a few times so far that they can't give certain classes on the Loyalist side certain weapons for the same reason, so I would bet any amount of money that's why. It would be kinda cool if they at least unlocked a Chaos legion or two for every class based on legion specializations so we can have a little bit of variety, but if we can at least just get really drippy Chaos cosmetics like we saw in the concept art, I'll be okay with that at this point.
A private lobby is a must, with options to be open and friends only.
Unlocking class restrictions would totally ruin the way the characters talk to eachother. Only issue I see but it's a big one.
Oh no, God forbid they don't say the same 5 lines every mission and stay quiet 90% of the time
I think it's good that the developers explain how certain design choices are intentionaland won't be changed, instead of making empty promises to keep people happy. And readability is incredibly important in a PvP game, if everyone ran around with camo cloaks you would have a much harder time distinguishing the classes. Team Fortress 2 is a good example, with every character having an instantly recognisable shape.
It's not gonna be face customization, we're most likely just gonna be able to change between the already available faces
Having no customization for chaos faction is quite lame. The classes that have problems should just be more restricted. Nobody should be making a khorne sniper anyways smh
Give them time bro
One thing for me is, can we stop the spinning gun target on the vanguard please developers
According to reliable french news (Les Echos), SM2 should reach 5 million units sold by the end of the week and potentially reach 10 millions over its life cycle. Also, the game cost around 40 millions euros in development budget.
Got the article to that?!
@@ChapterMasterValrak In french and behind paywall. However, I have the screencaps. Will send it to you on discord.
@@papazoulou9326Your duty does not end! Lol
€40 million for such a story rich game that plays & looks really good along with the co-op and PVP is great.
Those high quality cutscenes alone I thought would cost tens of millions. Lol
So what i can tell is the GW is telling them to not add proper chaos customization because of lore reasons but GW can Gaslight people by saying there where always Female custodes?
Its their"fuck you" to the fans for being upset about the femstodes
I just want a librarian. They already have the chaos model.
An easy fix. Please get all the chapter symbols available on the right pauldron. As a Deathwatch player, the DW Pauldron is on the left and the chapter symbol is moved to the right, I want to rep more chapters like blood angels and not only the 4/5 that happen to have right pauldron symbol options.
@ChapterMasterValrakk1 thanks mate! Let me try and work out how to hit you up… 😂
Anyone else notice how much Shaderak, Valrak, and Foilrak seem so similar? Do you think it's an Alpha legion thing?
I think Fabius Bile cloned the original
@@BattleBro77 so he is a heretic?
Bulwark does NOT need any adjustments, that's literally his whole kit
Yeah some of their responses regarding cosmetics in particular have been fairly disappointing, I should be able to put cloaks and capes on any of my marines ideally, restricting customization to this extent is very player unfriendly. Not to mention their whole reasoning for not allowing old school mark helmets for space marines is completely ridiculous, they can absolutely do it but I'm 90% sure Games Workshop doesn't want it to happen so they can keep promoting primaris models.
They say that Chaos classes are built around lore but yet Khorne beserkers are running around with a knife and a rifle shooting people more than stabbing. I want to fly around as a berserker with a hammer or chain sword
I disagree on their comments regarding recognisable classes for Chaos. I'm sure it wouldn't be impossible to differentiate a Chaos Tactical and the other classes. Havocs could be visually more armoured, Snipers less armoured, Bulwarks already have a shield, and Raptors have a unique style anyway. The only class that could be an issue would be vanguard, but you could just give them bone or daemonic adornments like you see with executioners and possessed?
If they ever implement 6 member PVP -> only against other 6 stack in PVP, no other match gets made for them. No random person just queuing up to go play some PVP would ever want to up against a tryhard premade.
I-Frames are invulnerable frames where you can't take damage or be interpreted. You get I-Frames during parries, dodges, and executions. Some people want I-Frames on gun strikes because it locks you into a action and you can end up taking more punishment than the 1 blip of armor for the kill is worth. I think most people (myself incuded untill it was cleared up) thought gunstrikes were more reward only for getting the enemy into that state over being a risk/reward opportunity on if you think you can take the shot to get your reward be it the damage on a bigger enamy or the kill and some armor.
A possible solution for "customizing" AI is to have them default to whatever your current loadout for that class is. Vermintide 2 does that I believe. The statement about i-frames on the gunstrike makes sense. You can still take damage when using a gunstrike because if you could chain gunstrikes with i-frames you could potentially render yourself near-invincible by doing so.
Valrak wearing shades again....we all know he's looked too deep into the Eye of Terror and it gave him a little gift. 😂
New class Ideas
Chaplin/Dark Apostle (Word Bearers)
Terminators (Red Corsairs)
Apothecary (Emperor’s Children)
Librarian/Sorcerer (Thousand Sons)
100% GW is stopping the chaos customization from being what we want it to be. If it doesnt exist as a model, it cant be in the game
I mean world eaters don’t have grapples so gw’s reasoning is already butt
I think GW is also the reason we can't get old school space marine helmets as well, it's all gotta be shitmaris
Anyone else find the close combat a bit cumbersome? I find myself never using the heavy blows in PVP or PVE as I'm just going to take damage, miss my attack or have my strong holding attack animation cancelled from enemy attacks. Very annoying.
The only reason you use heavy attacks in pvp is to break parries and blocks from bulwark iirc
Pink eye, again? Bloody hell, his eye must have made contact with his skid mark stained pants….
Bold of you to assume he wears anything under that desk. Lol
Ahh GW's management of the IP disguised as 'adherence to lore' by their intermediary. Every time. You can't have multiple classes in PvE because they're all established 'characters' ... but we will let you change their face. You can't have First Born armour marks because they're smaller and we'd have to make a whole new set of characters and animations ... but here is Titus at Primaris size in the prologue wearing First Born armour, and here are Heretic Astartes just straight-up the same size as the Primaris marines they're fighting. You can't alter the armour or classes of the Traitor Marines because that would go against 'the lore' ... but you can make a loyalist Primaris World Eater and have them be part of a multi-Chapter strike team launching from an Ultramarine battle barge but actually all of them are really established, named, Ultramarine characters you interact with in the campaign. Pull the other one Saber.
They should defo let us have cloaks on every class. GW models have cloaks. Why would a sniper even have a cloak? If its because they cloak to go invisible somebody needs to fire the wokey. They really need to add apothecary and Chaplain/Judiciar class pronto. Why wont they just let us have fun!! 😂 People are stomping this game at the hardest difficulty all day everyday. 3 tactical isnt going to break the game. WE CAN SKIP ALMOST EVERY ENEMY IN EVERY MAP. You can run from lift to lift and just cheese the whole operation, but we can't run 3 heavy marines. Behave mate.
Agreed
Visual identity is very very important in a game like this. I highly respect the devs for keeping that identity as distinct as possible
the loyalist mariens in every match dispute this claim. does that mean you are argueing to take away all custimzation from loyalist players in pvp? if so then i 100% agree with you, if not then it only makes sense for both sides to have custimization.
They could ad ranked versions of the game modes to restrict the options and make the regular to be just for fun and rewards alone while ranked also includes some more special armour pieces and things like that
The PvE jump pack is perfectly fine.
The intent of the assault is to leap in and maximise the assaults innate ability of having a larger parry window.
It's not bad, you have to adjust your playstyle to capitalise on the assault classes strength
I think its GREAT that GW is looking after the lore. And i'm sure, as this game develops they'll realize that PvP is where you can be way more flexible.
custom PvP lobbies will solve none of the crossplay issue.
No shoulderswap is an L take, we don't actually need the model to flip around and change hands or anything, just a camera change to peak the corner from the right flank. Honestly, this would work as a toggle or press hold rather than a setting in menu, most common use case is people playing as right hand camera and just flipping it specifically on right side corners
I'm actually gutted they just straight up said they wouldn't add it (after giving some of the worst reasoning I've ever seen). Hoping there is enough ppl making them aware this is a crucially important feature (atleast for PvP), been lvl 25 for a while and this is what causes most of my frustrations.
I’m honestly really hoping we get New armor that is based on the older designs from crusade-Modern era like the MK7 Aquila, what’s the reason they say they can’t “because GW” who the hell cares it doesn’t have to be canon, Halo infinite allows you to use the Armor from previous games and that doesn’t make much sense it’s just cool, also the canon excuse is such a joke my Marines in the game are Loyalist War hounds (Crusade era world eaters) you can already do stuff that breaks canon. Not to mention that the PVE marines are effectively just Smurfs playing dress up. (I’m really hoping that “but duh laaawwwre” doesn’t become an excuse for the developers to be lazy)
Not to mention designing Armor for the loyalists based on older designs would also make it easier to create more armor for the chaos Variants, because You can’t get Primaris Chaos Marines (so far) why not the devs make it easier on themselves.
Not to mention it’s hard to make the Space marine you really want to make if you’re stuck with the Primaris designs. (I love the Primaris mark X but it would be nice to have more designs)
They literally already have mk8 armour with the Deathwatch armour pieces you can get.
(But then said they can’t do other marks because they’d have to rescale everything.
@@Inquisitor_Vex sounds like laziness to me.
What about skin Customization? My Salamanders look European.
Anyone that thinks assault is weak in pvp just simply sucks at playing assault. If you face someone that knows how to play assault youll soon think otherwise.
Also i dont agree with any pvp changes just yet. Not enought high level people playing so yeah the bulwark seems oppressive to new people but thats just because they dont have the understanding to work around it yet.
The games only been out officially for a week and a half. Everyone needs to chill out and lets wait a few months.
I get their comments on not allowing tabbards on certain classes and not allowing exessive changes for the heretic astartes. It's all to do with the silhouette (outline) of a player. It is INCREDIBLY powerful, a glance tells you everything that that player can do because they look like a Bulwark or Assault marine you instantly know how to either get out of their way and attack from another angle or take them straight on, and you will make that desicion in seconds thanks to the characters silhouette. It's one of the most important parts of character design when it comes to class based PvP. Look at games like TF2 or Overwatch, hours and hours will have gone into the design of those characters to make sure that their silhouette is different from one character to another to enable quick reactions when playing off of and against one another.
They should let us add ornaments instead of different armour as a compromise
Increase audio overall by like 3x, because everything is waaay too quiet, make the parry mechanic and heavy attacks actually work in PvP, and add Chaos customization/overall customization. Do all that, and only that, and it's GOTY. Any more, any less, and they'll bury this in a shallow grave. Nerfing anything will absolutely ruin the game.
Facts the sound of the chainsaw sword in SM1 sounded terrifying. The SM2 chainsword sounds like a small muffler
being able to change my SMs face/skin colour will be a great bonus. I'm a Raven Guard successor player and none of the bare helmet models fit the legion and/or chapters that spawned from it (Raven Guard gene seed is known for causing their skin going alabaster white and almost translucent as they age) it'd be alot of work but I would like to see a series of heads to choose from and a skin tone gradient going from Raven guard pale white to Salamander obsidian black
I agree regarding robes, cloaks and tabards. personally i'd prefer the option to remove them entirely from my Marines. I dont need a see a loincloth to tell my marine is a Bulwak... the big ass ruddy shield kind of gives it away! at the end of the day the 1st legion on their 'unforgiven' children are on the way next... its going to be "MONK ROBES FOR EVERYONE!" soon enough
to be fair so far my grumbles about SM2 are either minor or cosmetic in nature. the vanguard/reaver class is missing the heavy bolt pistol from its side arm selection and it's also missing the fully enclose Vanguard helmet
🤣 Devs are worried about lore yet in operations the characters you are playing are ultramarines cosplaying as other chapters! 🤦
6 player squads are fine, but ONLY for PRIVATE LOBBIES! I do not wanna play against 6 man premade squads in match making, keep 6 man squads out of matchmaking. It will completely ruin PVP entirely.
If you see a 6 man squad just find another lobby
Primary issue in PvE is health system. It's unbearable even if you have perfect parry/ dodge technique.
Agree with the color palette sentiment, I'm using khorne red for blood ravens because the one they give us isn't bloody enough
I could be wrong, but I feel as though the restrictions on Chaos Customization could be coming from the GW side rather than just Saber themselves. I hope one day, if this is the case, they can come to some sort of compromise where you can at least get rid of the legion specific armors with more generic chaos ones. Sure it would be weird to see a Khorne Berserker as a sniper, but that doesn't mean a bloke from the Black Legion or some other Renegade warband wouldn't have snipers.
Overall this is a good Q&A where it shows that the dev team is listening to us and taking into consideration what we the gamers want and not afraid to address the gamers on where they can and can't deliver (looking at you Blizzard). They have a good thing here with this game and I hope they can continue to keep with this promise on letting the players having a hand on the future of this game.
I dont mind no fov slider or shoulder-swap, Dont think either are necessary for this game.
I dont think there are any "broken" classes in pvp, or overpowered ones. The Heavy could swap the dodge to a hop, rather than a roll, which'd help make them a bit more vulnurable since they're so tanky, but the bulwark just needs the right approach (stun grenade).
The assault in pvp is easily the most difficult class to play, but I've seen people dominate with it.
Team-swap and randomization is a must.
I think in terms of how the chaos class/factions are handled, probably would've been easier to just have generic chaos marines and allow color/armor changes. You wouldn't get the cooler cosmetics, but at least there'd be room for customization, where's now they're a limited.
😂 the valrak channels the Future's So Bright he has to wear shades 👓
Im good with them just fixing the servers for now because gezzz...
Whats funny about their example of World Eater snipers beinf lore breaking is that it means GW clearly forgot about the Bloodstalkers, a World Eater warband soecializing in long range killing introduced in our 9th ed codex
I want a game mode where you have 1 life as each of your classes first to deplete the opposing teams roster and if your out of space marines you can infinitely spawn as a guardsmen loyalist or chaos orientated depending on teams obviously but you should be just as squishy as the ones in the campaign it'd be great fun.
I-frames means "invulnerable frames" Basicly while you do certain actions, you cannot be damaged and you are invulnerable.
This would be a thing they should have in the PvE since sometimes your animation is so long for some combos, your shields are completly gone and your HP is 50% or less because monsters got free hits on you while you're doing a combo..
So what I heard about Chaos customization was that I won't be doing a Plague Marine Tactical or Heavy any time soon. Feels bad man...
If private lobby exists it will live on forever! For the Emperor!
Keep in mind that when they cite lore as a restriction, that may very well entail a limitation instated by GW, not themselves. Which the creative director has alluded to in comment responses.
Just saw your initial reaction to the trailer 2 years ago. It was so wholesome. I hope you enjoy/enjoyed this game as much as i did. Its so fucking awesome!!!
i-frame is a term coined by players that references a precise frame within a certain animation that makes the player invincible.
They better include an in-game codex in a future update. That would be a convenient way to tantalize new folks into the lore.