Particle in a 1D Box | Infinite Potential Well Problem in QM

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024

Комментарии • 39

  • @ajittiwari9766
    @ajittiwari9766 Месяц назад +6

    Please continue this series on Quantum Mechanics ❤

  • @koushiksaikia
    @koushiksaikia Месяц назад +3

    Very well explained sir.Please make a video on Dirac orthonormality related to momentum eigen functions. Also address the point, why we can't have discrete momentum eigen values. I have been trying to understand this portion from Griffiths QM book,but not understood properly.

  • @pauldirac6243
    @pauldirac6243 Месяц назад +5

    Another great lecture Dibs, thanks.I think that after 30 episodes, you finally found your stride.And these lectures are becoming fun and informative and exciting.Keep it up!

  • @jackdeago3639
    @jackdeago3639 Месяц назад +2

    Thank you for such awesome videos can you made another series like this but about general relativity

  • @SergeyPopach
    @SergeyPopach Месяц назад +4

    In quantum physics, the particle is not always has discrete energy levels. It has only discrete energy levels if it’s in bounded states.

  • @AyanMandal-pk8jm
    @AyanMandal-pk8jm Месяц назад +2

    Hi i am a very old viewer of your channel. I started watching your channel when i was in class 9 and now i have completed my 12 th .i always like your video very much.
    I have a doubt in this question that why the probability density is independent of time? As the particle has a velocity it should be moving inside the well ,so the probability density should vary with time but it is not happening .can you explain why this is happening?

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  Месяц назад +2

      That's an interesting feature of particles bound to potentials. The wave function is dependent on time and continuously evolves with time. However the eige functions represent stationary states. Probabilities and expectation values are independent of time. Even though we can imagine the particle to be continuously in motion (a perspective of classical physics) QM theory can only offer this information. U must have also seen the fixed orbitals of H-atom

  • @Ankankumar6811
    @Ankankumar6811 29 дней назад +1

    'Sir when your new lecture is coming' it feels like Endgame is coming after Infinity War 😅

  • @adityanastik8098
    @adityanastik8098 Месяц назад +2

    Plz continue sir....❤❤❤❤

  • @Ankankumar6811
    @Ankankumar6811 Месяц назад +1

    Please continue sir ❤

  • @loban6162
    @loban6162 6 дней назад

    Please continue sir

  • @pauldirac6243
    @pauldirac6243 Месяц назад +2

    I also heard about things like the Fourier trick or the Fourier transform As a method to find the CN coefficients.I'm really interested and curious about it.If somebody could please tell me...I'm dying here..is there anybody out there?..

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  Месяц назад +2

      Cn coefficients can be found by doing an inner product of the system wave function with the individual respective eige function solution

    • @pauldirac6243
      @pauldirac6243 Месяц назад +1

      @FortheLoveofPhysics great, thanks, can you explain in more detail in a future video? 😀

  • @fehmi35
    @fehmi35 Месяц назад

    Beautiful lecture, I hope you make a video on periodic potential, Bloch function etc.

  • @RiyaShrivastava-w4l
    @RiyaShrivastava-w4l Месяц назад

    Sir pls make video on chemical bonding and molecular structure

  • @itsoktochoosephysics
    @itsoktochoosephysics 17 дней назад

    Sir, please upload more videos.

  • @zhenwalker
    @zhenwalker Месяц назад +1

    Which book is best for general relativity

  • @Balgopal-bd6lf
    @Balgopal-bd6lf 26 дней назад

    Sir next lecture plz..

  • @VikramSingh-gs1ud
    @VikramSingh-gs1ud Месяц назад +1

    Sir what is utility of these 1D 2D potenials n harmonic oscliiator..plz explain where i see n use these in my daily life..plz explain some physics examples where these concepts r used..plz reply sir..i would b obliged sir

  • @koushikmandal997
    @koushikmandal997 Месяц назад

    For this case Hamiltonian and momentum operator commute with each other. Can you please tell why the eigen function of the Hamiltonian is not an eigen function of the momentum operator ?

  • @pauldirac6243
    @pauldirac6243 Месяц назад

    I'll ask again, What determines the value of the Cn coefficients? @37:40

  • @pauldirac6243
    @pauldirac6243 Месяц назад

    Are the Cn coefficients of the linear superposition found by using a Fourier series analysis? Or something else?

  • @Gokulkrish-k8b
    @Gokulkrish-k8b Месяц назад

    Energy associated with the particle in 1d box is discreate why?
    Bcz in QM we represent the particle by using wave function (Wave) so the wavelength associated with the wave with in the box is discrete so the wave number K is also discrete and the engrgy also discrete ( This is only true for the bounded systems like Infinite box,LHO and H atom )
    Is this correct sir .... If not please explain

  • @SergeyPopach
    @SergeyPopach Месяц назад

    The infinite potential well is just limiting case of more realistic, but complex finite well case. Just like Dirac delta function potential case…

  • @deviljetsay4732
    @deviljetsay4732 Месяц назад +1

    Sir please series me itna gap mat kijie😊

  • @Folorunsho3729
    @Folorunsho3729 Месяц назад

    14:56 if our system is 1-dimensional, why are the energy levels increasing in another direction?
    Please explain why that's so.

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  Месяц назад +3

      Particle can only move in x-axis. That's why its 1D. Energy levels simply show the value of energy the particle has, for that we have chosen the other axis as - energy axis

    • @Folorunsho3729
      @Folorunsho3729 Месяц назад

      @@FortheLoveofPhysics that must mean we aren't really right in our diagram, but we're are restricted to use it that way as it's really hard to get the intuition of how the discrete levels is oriented?

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  Месяц назад

      @@Folorunsho3729 It's only confusing if you imagine both axis to represent space dimensions, and hence imagine particle to be moving in 2D plane (which isn't the case). Even in the initial diagram, the y-axis represents Energy (with two hard walls representing infinite potential). such diagrams are quite common

    • @Folorunsho3729
      @Folorunsho3729 Месяц назад

      @@FortheLoveofPhysics aiit thanks

  • @harry-ho9ti
    @harry-ho9ti Месяц назад

    From where concept of potential well comes in quantum mechanics.?

    • @eurekame
      @eurekame Месяц назад +1

      An atom is a system. The electron is trapped in that system. The electron can't escape the atom. Potential well is an analogous concept to an atom.

    • @SergeyPopach
      @SergeyPopach Месяц назад +1

      @@eurekamethe atom system is not square potential well case. the atom potential is way more complex and can be only approximated with quantum oscillator case

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 Месяц назад +1

    Keep remembering that a. the particle has a mass (so it can't be a photon), b. that it's velocity is non-relativistic and c. that it has no spin.