Dick Smith: Why Scientists Are Biased Against Nuclear

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
  • Aussie entrepreneur Dick Smith has claimed Australia's top scientists are biased against nuclear energy and are minimising renewable prices while inflating nuclear costs.
    He told us why he's weighing in on the nuclear debate.
    #Nuclear #DickSmith #NuclearEnergy

Комментарии • 43

  • @arclux
    @arclux 3 месяца назад +10

    Can you get some actual independent industry experts on?

    • @mikldude9376
      @mikldude9376 3 месяца назад

      They won’t do it , clearly they are biased against nuclear.

    • @tinto278
      @tinto278 2 месяца назад

      This is an entertainment program, not a science or news show. 😂😂

    • @arclux
      @arclux 2 месяца назад +1

      @@tinto278
      It's not even an entertainment program 😂😂😂

  • @darrencarter-fk3oo
    @darrencarter-fk3oo 3 месяца назад +9

    LOL the Gencost review, has been discredited on so many levels, it would be a fail/ resubmit for a 1st year uni student 😂😂😂😂

  • @marcox978
    @marcox978 3 месяца назад +20

    That incident in SA where renewables powered 100% of the state happened on only one day. Optimum renewable production with minimal consumption. It only happened once!

    • @ashleydavidson4072
      @ashleydavidson4072 3 месяца назад

      Just make something up or repeat something you heard once?. Google it mate! "From December 12 to 19, National Energy Market data showed wind and solar contributed on average 103.5 per cent towards the state's energy demand."

    • @thewayneflyinghigh9128
      @thewayneflyinghigh9128 3 месяца назад

      That’s becuase it had backup. Renewables are unreliable.

    • @Herbert12864
      @Herbert12864 3 месяца назад +4

      And our prices are still high. We were sold a con

    • @marcox978
      @marcox978 3 месяца назад

      @@Herbert12864 Labor is failing at their experiment and they need to go

    • @lisafoodie8443
      @lisafoodie8443 3 месяца назад +1

      i remember hearing this somewhere: australia exports high quality australian coal to china so china can manufacture wind turbines and solar panels... 🙃🤡

  • @JohnHorsley-ct3rk
    @JohnHorsley-ct3rk 3 месяца назад +2

    Ideology blind to facts ,use some deception, repeat lies and have stooges back your narrative .

  • @benjamingriswold2564
    @benjamingriswold2564 3 месяца назад +3

    We only listen to Kogan now

  • @benwilson6145
    @benwilson6145 3 месяца назад +4

    Maybe since its so good he should fund his own reactor

    • @eezeetoo
      @eezeetoo 3 месяца назад +1

      It is illegal - the ban needs to be lifted.

    • @benwilson6145
      @benwilson6145 3 месяца назад

      @@eezeetoo what are you on?

  • @stephenbrickwood1602
    @stephenbrickwood1602 2 месяца назад

    Nuclear only works economically is if PV and EVs are made illegal.
    What if the sun is shining for days and days and days ???
    What if the sun shines for months and months 🤔 ????
    How does the national electrical grid get its $100sbillions in cashflow ????
    The national electrical grid is a $TRILLIONS infrastructure investment and needs cashflow.

  • @BardCanning
    @BardCanning 2 месяца назад

    I'll make up my mind once Bing Lee releases a statement.

  • @PeterKhan-s2g
    @PeterKhan-s2g 2 месяца назад

    If that bloke who has 40 years experience in power grid is very blind when Finland went down the renewables path and that country almost went bankrupt until they turned on their new nuclear power plant and the price of power dropped to 30% of baseload power supply

  • @stephenbrickwood1602
    @stephenbrickwood1602 2 месяца назад

    Cold latitude solutions are wrong for warm latitudes countries. 😊

  • @marcinmorun
    @marcinmorun 2 месяца назад

    And I love weiners!

  • @quietackshon
    @quietackshon 3 месяца назад

    Cope

  • @carlaburgers3088
    @carlaburgers3088 3 месяца назад +1

    Who listens to SCIRO anyway. They're a bunch of people who can't do their job at all. SCIRO is most probably going to split up.

    • @zen1647
      @zen1647 2 месяца назад +1

      CSIRO is a government funded scientific research organisation. They produce excellent work.

  • @KenDyer-wl4lf
    @KenDyer-wl4lf 2 месяца назад

    Could it be that scientists are biased against nuclear because they actually know what they are talking about?

  • @kreagle
    @kreagle 3 месяца назад +3

    Mr Smith needs to retire and enjoy life. Leave CSIRO alone

    • @mikldude9376
      @mikldude9376 3 месяца назад +2

      Why , the csiro gets their money from the government, do you expect the csiro to play any tune that does not align with their paymaster ?

    • @kreagle
      @kreagle 3 месяца назад

      @@mikldude9376 wake up and smell the coffee. Leave the conspiracies to professionals 🐒🙈

  • @rosso4014
    @rosso4014 3 месяца назад +4

    Amazon just purchased a data centre ($650 m US) so they can access 24/7 emission free nuclear power. Constellation Energy supplies 20 per cent of US nuclear power stock price up 70 per cent this year. Every advanced economy in the world is marching out of step except us. 🥲

    • @benwilson6145
      @benwilson6145 3 месяца назад

      Maybe do some research! No body is installing nuclear reactors, just name on actual company that is. It would take 30 year before it produced power. Potatoes tell lies

    • @michaelchilds3305
      @michaelchilds3305 2 месяца назад +2

      Not true Germany is moving away from Nuclear and investing in more renewable energy. Norway relies heavily on Hydro and renewables.

    • @zen1647
      @zen1647 2 месяца назад

      @@rosso4014 In 2023 about 5 GW of nuclear power came online globally. Also in 2023 507 GW of renewable energy was deployed.

    • @evil17
      @evil17 2 месяца назад

      @@michaelchilds3305Germany is actually regretting their shutting down of their nuclear reactors as an overstep reaction to the Fukushima incident, they are considering powering up their reactors again because their energy prices have gone way up with renewables, as they have to import expensive (mostly nuclear) energy from neighbouring countries to make up what their renewables can’t.