F/A-18 Confirmed in 2025 Leaks! - War Thunder Game-Changers

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 янв 2025

Комментарии • 192

  • @TheEuropeanCanadian
    @TheEuropeanCanadian  19 дней назад +12

    It's just like Gaijin to hide some vehicles in decals. Have a wonderful Christmas everyone!

  • @SgtDuckx
    @SgtDuckx 19 дней назад +113

    Gajin- "We recognize that CAS is a problem."
    Gajin- *Adds more CAS*

    • @OneMoreDesu
      @OneMoreDesu 18 дней назад

      Welcome to modern combat. Tanks are targets.

    • @Madoyon.
      @Madoyon. 18 дней назад +4

      Imo, CAS is not the problem, it's the imbalance in capabilities of different countries' CAS and AA. For example: at top tier some can launch 6 IR-guided oneshot missiles from 40 km and be protected by SPAA with 20km of max range and ability to lead SAMs at two targets at the same time, while others only have laser guided bombs and heat seeker manpads, or AGMs for 800+ spawn points with 50kg of TNT that hit a rooftop machie gun and that's it.

    • @SgtDuckx
      @SgtDuckx 18 дней назад +3

      @@Madoyon. aka CAS is the problem.

    • @Madoyon.
      @Madoyon. 18 дней назад +3

      @@SgtDuckx When you play certain lacking nations against certain overperforming ones - yes. Not vice versa though. CAS shouldn't be a problem for you when your team irons the enemy respawn with 4x Su-34 in the first 3 minutes of the match. Can't say the same about being on the receiving end.

    • @Madoyon.
      @Madoyon. 18 дней назад +2

      @@SgtDuckx What I'm implying is that nations should be balanced to be able to counter each other in one way or another. Taking an air superiority loadout jet for 700+ sp should not be the key to it. Lifting the nation co-op restrictions like we have in arcade might fix it, when it will be meta vs meta. It's not only the CAS problem. Devs have a twisted understanding of rock paper scissors.

  • @rudolvonstroheim6634
    @rudolvonstroheim6634 19 дней назад +82

    me patiently waiting on bismarck

    • @wilsonsantiago-e3c
      @wilsonsantiago-e3c 19 дней назад +13

      Same and still no point increase on CAS lolol

    • @faustyplayz8464
      @faustyplayz8464 19 дней назад +4

      Play warthunder mobile.

    • @farmdog93
      @farmdog93 19 дней назад +2

      Tbh so am I, and other countries ships as well, as much as I like the usa and our ships im looking forward to the others as well

    • @mathieu722
      @mathieu722 18 дней назад +1

      Since Richelieu is confirmed, all other ship around that league gonna come in 025, so the Bismarck too.

    • @fegelein2233
      @fegelein2233 18 дней назад +3

      Tbh dude Tirpitz would be slit better better AA suite and torpedos because of the refit

  • @ricolives1166
    @ricolives1166 19 дней назад +55

    The F18 is 100% confirmed. The ONLY reason why it wasn't in this update is because it's focused on the Typhoons. Get it, Storm update, Typhoons? It some what rhymes. So maybe not the next major update but some time in 2025 will be the Hornet or Bee or Wasp update. Its all for marketing. Everyone needs to calm down. Devs know what they are doing. Just spacing it out.

    • @valeredumont5018
      @valeredumont5018 18 дней назад +6

      Rafale is meaning strong wind in french too

    • @ricolives1166
      @ricolives1166 18 дней назад +4

      @valeredumont5018 i honestly didn't know that since I dont speak French but see? It rhymes. It all goes together. Typhoons. Strong wings. Storm.

    • @RedXlV
      @RedXlV 18 дней назад +1

      It's wild that the Typhoon and Rafale were added *before* the F/A-18.
      I was fully expecting the final update of 2024 to focus on the Hornets, and for the Eurofighter and Rafale to come in the first major update of 2025. But for some reason Gaijin did the opposite.

    • @Arch-e2v
      @Arch-e2v 18 дней назад +1

      @@RedXlV I wonder if they will actually add ground radar capability for the hornet

    • @Wolffjaeger
      @Wolffjaeger 18 дней назад +5

      @ricolives1166 trust me, it'll be called "HORNET'S NEST", probably comes with new CVN-65 Enterprise

  • @davidbalogun7569
    @davidbalogun7569 18 дней назад +13

    You've done the SU-30 a disservice here. It should be a SUBSTANTIAL upgrade on the SU-27 in game not just based on weaponry. It has a PESA Radar, upgraded engines AND thrust vectoring. The flight performance and avionics wouldn't be that conparable. Kinda like the Mirage->Rafale

  • @Thiago--de6ez
    @Thiago--de6ez 19 дней назад +27

    Something to mention about Su-30SM that i never heard TEC mention is that it also has Thrust Vectoring

    • @Petkopanchov
      @Petkopanchov 18 дней назад

      TEC messing up a russian plain... nothing new... :D

  • @pig1114
    @pig1114 18 дней назад +7

    The SU-30SM will also be a big leap forward when it comes to supermanouverability/controlability, seeing as it'll be the first aircraft in game with thrust vectoring nozzles not meant for VTOL.

  • @ThatsOk83
    @ThatsOk83 18 дней назад +4

    When was the last time we had a ground forces centric update. I feel like we’ve had so many air ones that I’ve given up and started grinding air

  • @CrispyMuffin2
    @CrispyMuffin2 19 дней назад +9

    man i really dont care about newer jets anymore, its just gonna make top tier even more insufferable each time they add a vehicle more modern than the last. id much rather have them actually address the map and gamemode issues that make top tier unenjoyable in the first place

  • @ArcticWipeout
    @ArcticWipeout 18 дней назад +4

    The SU-30 is a massive upgrade in flight performance. It has canards, upgraded engines and thrust vectoring. It also has a way more advanced radar. You're downplaying the plane massively.

  • @ulfhedtyrsson
    @ulfhedtyrsson 19 дней назад +26

    If you spade the Rapier, does that make you a master rapiest?

    • @darkcenturion5735
      @darkcenturion5735 18 дней назад

      Rapierist, if we were to ruin the joke with correct english

  • @w1zz0k12
    @w1zz0k12 19 дней назад +12

    Me patiently waiting on Yamato

    • @younameit9084
      @younameit9084 18 дней назад +1

      Not sure if that will turn up next year. Maybe it will as they did say they were gunna add the most famous and most powerful battleships. If it does turn up then it will be right at the end of the year as the final big surprise

  • @Wolffjaeger
    @Wolffjaeger 18 дней назад +2

    I am interested in one of many Hornet's equipment, AGM-88 HARM. It is a tactical, air-to-surface anti-radiation missile designed to home in on electronic transmissions coming from surface-to-air radar systems. To which I say, SAYONARA PANTSIRS

    • @thedarkartist3635
      @thedarkartist3635 18 дней назад

      Better yet, everything from the Tornados to the MiG 29 apparently can mount those, so a lot of nato countries will have good access to it

  • @mathieu722
    @mathieu722 19 дней назад +4

    The Richelieu spotted in the picture is a 1943 refit, so the one with 14x quad 40mm bofor and 20mm on every flat surface :p
    Can't wait to get it alongside later it's ultimate refit post WW2.

    • @aaronthe747fan
      @aaronthe747fan 18 дней назад

      It also could be Jean Bart

    • @RedXlV
      @RedXlV 18 дней назад +1

      @@aaronthe747fan Jean Bart wouldn't have any 40mm Bofors. Instead it would be mounting 57mm Bofors twins. Along with a metric fuckton of radar-directed 100mm dual purpose guns.

    • @Boromas_1
      @Boromas_1 18 дней назад +1

      @@aaronthe747fan No it's Richelieu, Jean Bart's superstructure is shorter and is more cuboid.

  • @Spearhead45
    @Spearhead45 19 дней назад +3

    It is highly likely that Gaijin will introduce the F/A-18A model, considering their track record. It seems almost unbelievable that they would provide the United States with a self-propelled anti-aircraft system equipped with guns while we continue to face challenges at the top tier. They have yet to include the SLAMRAAM for the United States. What could be the reason for this oversight?

    • @heniogigakoks5925
      @heniogigakoks5925 19 дней назад

      you know that f18 with 10 amraams will still be worse than f15e?

    • @ArcticWipeout
      @ArcticWipeout 18 дней назад

      THE SLAMRAAM is difficult to add since it relies on a separate radar vehicle to be able to function. And no it can't be used to just maddog missiles. They've said they're looking at ways of adding in vehicles with different parts like AA systems so hopefully we'll see it in game somehow, even if the lil dude has to tow around his radar or something lol.

  • @rodolfohernandez2702
    @rodolfohernandez2702 19 дней назад +9

    The SU-30SM nice addition but that sillouette for the F/A-18 Hornet is starting to awaken my hype for it again

  • @Armada-1935
    @Armada-1935 19 дней назад +1

    Merry Christmas guys

  • @TheHangarHobbit
    @TheHangarHobbit 18 дней назад +1

    Countdown until classified F/A-18 documents are leaked when Gaijin gets the specs wrong begins now 🤣🤣

  • @fahronramdhani1353
    @fahronramdhani1353 18 дней назад +2

    We require more advanced SPAA systems to ensure balanced gameplay. The newly introduced fighter jets are excessively powerful and challenging to counter effectively.

  • @phantom_ii4594
    @phantom_ii4594 18 дней назад

    I hope they add the A+ and C hornet to the tech tree, and maybe the regular A as a squadron vehicle or something

  • @flyingfortress4819
    @flyingfortress4819 19 дней назад

    For 2025, I’m really hoping for a bomber-focused update. It seems like Gaijin has forgotten that they exist and bombers feel like they don’t have a chance (unless you’re a Tu-4). I’d like to see a change in their gameplay and see more of them in the game (like the B-24J). The whole reason I found War Thunder back in 2013 was because I wanted a game where I could fly the He-111 because it looked cool. I know it won’t happen, but it’s nice to dream

  • @merr3453
    @merr3453 19 дней назад +8

    Finally I can look at comments in peace without some person going: “no f18 😡😡”

    • @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze
      @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze 18 дней назад +2

      It should have come this update. This newest update was one of the weakest in years

    • @General_kenobi12
      @General_kenobi12 18 дней назад

      ​@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze says who? Gaijin can release whatever they want in whatever update they like. They plan these years before.

  • @kylevonscheerschmidt8337
    @kylevonscheerschmidt8337 17 дней назад

    I low key would like to see a rank three StuG III for the Finland tree in Sweden

  • @saonpai7301
    @saonpai7301 18 дней назад

    F/A-18 is actually on last years DC server profile picture in War Thunder E-Sport DC server so, i really cant sure it is real

  • @AoshiALT
    @AoshiALT 18 дней назад +1

    since the F/A-18 has a high chance of being added in 2025 n switzerland is using the F/A-18 that might actually help germany in cause Germany struggles in cas so having a swiss side tech tree would be a banger since switzerland used stuff like the F5, F-18, P-51s Bf-109s Mirage III, Hawker Hunters, Mosqouito, Venoms, And if the F-35 will be added both Germany And Switzerland Both Bought F-35s and is expected to receive them by 2027

    • @bored-co7722
      @bored-co7722 18 дней назад

      Switzerland does not use it as a multi role vehicle so as it was said a while back when it gets added to US it'll have everything whereas itll come as an air fighter only to Germany unlikely to have ground munitions

  • @purgetrapscorp
    @purgetrapscorp 19 дней назад

    Who could have guessed that one of the most sought-after planes would come in an update or two?

  • @LastGoatKnight
    @LastGoatKnight 19 дней назад

    I only need 6 victories in Air RB and finally I can start grinding my beloved fighter, the F-104J. That's my present from myself for Christmas. Hopefully I can start it BEFORE the integration of the Thai sub-tree into the tech tree grind. I am not really looking forward to it but it is what it is. Life's failing me so I grab any dubs I get

  • @h1massive
    @h1massive 10 дней назад

    I'm trying to understand the appeal of the F/A-18 as it is slower than the f-15e and carries basically the same air to air loadout?

  • @mlgrocket
    @mlgrocket 19 дней назад

    hopefully they add the super hornet, considering they only teased the legacy hornet. the only legacy hornets that can carry the 9X are the C and D, but we all know gaijin won't add either, so it'll be the A or B.

  • @armabearo
    @armabearo 17 дней назад

    They need to put the aim-174 into the game for the hornet

  • @itzygorilla6925
    @itzygorilla6925 18 дней назад

    now i just wonder if they are planning to give it to the german tree as well since its been leaked for the germans before. also its interesting how prototype american spaas look like esp with the one on the chassis of an m1 abrams with 2 30mm bushmasters and stingers where the ammon would be for a typical abrams.

  • @Severe_WX
    @Severe_WX 19 дней назад +9

    Where's the F-2 ? ? ?

    • @aaronthe747fan
      @aaronthe747fan 18 дней назад

      Likely coming latter probably the summer update

    • @hellonmyearth
      @hellonmyearth 18 дней назад

      F-2 early( aam 3, aam 4a, Aesa 1) for sure come next update, maybe after next update on 13.7 br. Late version (2018-2022) go 14.3-14.7 probably

  • @Goddagame
    @Goddagame 18 дней назад

    They will be adding subs for naval this next year

  • @LordVonGoose
    @LordVonGoose 17 дней назад

    The battleship could also be the Strasbourg

  • @milnersway569
    @milnersway569 19 дней назад +1

    Wonder if they add Indian mig 27/29, su30mki to the uk tree plus f18 aus can variants uk air tree

  • @SgtLubasz
    @SgtLubasz 19 дней назад

    Instead of introducing new jets that i will not get, fix BR for Mig 29, impossible to grind at 12.7, costant spam of Fox 3 missles.

  • @PaulMacQ
    @PaulMacQ 17 дней назад

    Minor possibility Su-30Mki for India-UK
    Unlikely but possible

  • @cowboychicken1415
    @cowboychicken1415 17 дней назад

    We must keep yapping for more game modes. They’re bound to hear it eventually if we drown them out with all the yapping

  • @GrzegorzBrzeczyszczykiewicz-12
    @GrzegorzBrzeczyszczykiewicz-12 17 дней назад

    SU 30 MKI my beloved

  • @oitudobem3508
    @oitudobem3508 День назад

    Has any hint for a new nation in 2025 ?

  • @dadofamadhouse4194
    @dadofamadhouse4194 18 дней назад

    This is prolly just me but I don't care about getting new top tier stuff (mainly cuz I'm not there yet and not really in a rush) but instead I wish they'd update missions or rework arcade and rb objectives, maybe extend match times, and all the other stuff I've ranted about wanting in past comments lol

  • @bobr.thunder
    @bobr.thunder 19 дней назад

    I'm waiting for the BMPT-72 and the rosomak

  • @CptCrazyWolfMan01
    @CptCrazyWolfMan01 19 дней назад +1

    Think I'm in like the 10% who are looking forward to the mig 31BM when it's added

  • @GoldRaven-oe4by
    @GoldRaven-oe4by 17 дней назад +1

    Literally the only thing i care about is them adding more 1.0-7.0 ground stuff anything else i just dont care

  • @Godspeed_95_51
    @Godspeed_95_51 18 дней назад +1

    Still no top tier spaa for Israel? What is gaijin doing

  • @AJS37_Viggen
    @AJS37_Viggen 19 дней назад

    what are the chances of finland getting their f/a-18 c/d

  • @MrTefe
    @MrTefe 19 дней назад +1

    F-18 My beloved

  • @ulfhedtyrsson
    @ulfhedtyrsson 19 дней назад

    Didn't they give the last years decals free with playing a few matches?

  • @Stridsvagn-PanzerKommandant
    @Stridsvagn-PanzerKommandant 19 дней назад

    Im excited for American Gepard, better be 8.3-8.7
    Finally decent AA, just missing the M114 with the 20mm

    • @gunsblazing4509
      @gunsblazing4509 17 дней назад

      If we're lucky Gaijin will add the XM246 with its proxy ammo, which would make it 9.0 I think

  • @stuffjunk5019
    @stuffjunk5019 18 дней назад

    that's a really big SAM..

  • @MEH43788
    @MEH43788 15 дней назад

    Will the be a Swiss f/a 18 in Germany

  • @tenarmurk
    @tenarmurk 18 дней назад

    Waiting for norwegian and danish subtree

  • @BoldHorse
    @BoldHorse 18 дней назад +1

    More, more CAS! How about some lav25 for US? :(

    • @Novafire194
      @Novafire194 17 дней назад

      Not until the UK gets it's LAV family via Canada (the LAV-25 is basically an American version of the Coyote (LAV II))

  • @mab2187
    @mab2187 18 дней назад

    Nxt year I hope we get the Su-37 and Su-47.

    • @loops_9035
      @loops_9035 18 дней назад

      Su-47 is very unlikely as it was just a flight demonstrator, not produced or fitted with armaments

    • @mab2187
      @mab2187 18 дней назад

      @@loops_9035 "Unlikely", wrong, its tech demonstrator means jackshit cuz Yak 41 was tested, it didn't even had weapons or radar mounted. We have it tho. So yea Su-47 very likely to come, when? I hope nxt year.

    • @FunFishFacts
      @FunFishFacts 12 дней назад

      ​@@mab2187 no.

    • @mab2187
      @mab2187 12 дней назад

      @@FunFishFacts yes.

  • @SlipKnot7866
    @SlipKnot7866 18 дней назад

    didnt the modernized ver. of the Richelieu have triple quad turrets?

    • @tenarmurk
      @tenarmurk 18 дней назад

      No battleship modernization rarely changes the main armament in a significant way that was only done once in history

    • @Boromas_1
      @Boromas_1 18 дней назад

      That was the plan for Battleship Alsace, although France never got around to make those cause the Germany invaded.

    • @SlipKnot7866
      @SlipKnot7866 17 дней назад

      @@tenarmurk Well the only real basis I have for the triple turret setup is because that's how it's shown in WoWs, but I guess that fit was never actually used or was only ever planned but not implemented on any of the French BB's

    • @SlipKnot7866
      @SlipKnot7866 17 дней назад

      @@Boromas_1 Yea, I see now I had the 2 mixed up. I knew there was a French BB with a triple turret setup that I remember from WoWs, but it is indeed the Alsace and not the Rich.

  • @VincentZhong-ow5xj
    @VincentZhong-ow5xj 19 дней назад +5

    Will the Canadian f18 be under Britain?

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 19 дней назад

      If it does it’s a 50/50 chance because there is Canadian vehicles in both US and British tech tree

    • @PalexHorse
      @PalexHorse 19 дней назад

      It could also go to Britain for the Australian one because I think Britain has Australian vehicles too

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 19 дней назад +1

      @ that seem more likely because the US tree doesn’t have any Australian vehicles

    • @PalexHorse
      @PalexHorse 19 дней назад +1

      @@TylerJC40especially in air, the us I think only has one which is the m1a1 aim , it does suck that the us doesn’t have any sub trees, Israel would’ve been nice to have but maybe they’ll add in one eventually

    • @viperz3r016
      @viperz3r016 19 дней назад

      If the US gets one, then the UK tree should (like the Aardvarks for example)

  • @capitainsheep1137
    @capitainsheep1137 19 дней назад

    i mean if there su 30 , they got to put F18 too

  • @satisfytube0
    @satisfytube0 17 дней назад

    Can you make a video about the ASIAN Sub tree beacuse Iwanna hear your opinion

  • @Senbonzakura776
    @Senbonzakura776 19 дней назад

    So it be possible to eventually see an Su-30 in the UK line thanks to India.

    • @placeholder7213
      @placeholder7213 19 дней назад

      Also the Indian rafale and the Canadian f18

    • @heniogigakoks5925
      @heniogigakoks5925 19 дней назад +1

      no pls no

    • @Tracer2619
      @Tracer2619 18 дней назад

      ​@placeholder7213 And the Aussie Abrams and Canadian Leopards! Oh wait...

    • @britishbred52
      @britishbred52 18 дней назад

      i mean hopefully not

    • @britishbred52
      @britishbred52 18 дней назад

      @@placeholder7213PLEASE NO

  • @محمد-ذ3ص3ث
    @محمد-ذ3ص3ث 18 дней назад

    Where is f14D?

  • @BergBolado
    @BergBolado 18 дней назад +2

    You guys think italy could receive the spanish F/A-18?
    Merry Christmas!

  • @Theratsnatcher
    @Theratsnatcher 18 дней назад +2

    "my glorious king f18 with 10 aim120 and 2 aim9 is going to be best" 🙏🏽

    • @RedXlV
      @RedXlV 18 дней назад +1

      F/A-18F with 4x AIM-174B, 4x AIM-120D, and 2x AIM-9X please. (And maps big enough that AIM-174's 300+km range would actually be useful.)

    • @tenarmurk
      @tenarmurk 18 дней назад +2

      ​@@RedXlVyea no bro calm down

    • @mattcooper6591
      @mattcooper6591 18 дней назад +1

      Yeahhh the F-15 will get up to altitude and speed much faster allowing it to fire its AIM-120 sooner and at longer ranges than the F-18. Don’t get me wrong. Love the F-18 but it’s not going to be some crazy aircraft. It’s slow compared to others

    • @britishbred52
      @britishbred52 18 дней назад +1

      @@RedXlVlol no

    • @Theratsnatcher
      @Theratsnatcher 17 дней назад

      @@mattcooper6591 we will see

  • @ozelotsoffunT-jz2rt
    @ozelotsoffunT-jz2rt 18 дней назад

    America cannot not absolutely dominate top tier Air and Air in general for more than one update

  • @mikemccolum5832
    @mikemccolum5832 19 дней назад +1

    I cant wait for the richelleu 😮

    • @nicolaspeigne1429
      @nicolaspeigne1429 19 дней назад

      Same, hope it's the american refit so we have actual AA

    • @mathieu722
      @mathieu722 19 дней назад

      @@nicolaspeigne1429 The Richelieu spotted in the decal is the 1943 refit, so yep, the one with full dakka AA ^^

    • @aaronthe747fan
      @aaronthe747fan 18 дней назад

      ​@@mathieu722it could also be Jean Bart

    • @mathieu722
      @mathieu722 18 дней назад

      @@aaronthe747fan Jean Bart specially with it's best refit (post war) have not this shape, and have radars on top.
      This is typical of the Richelieu of 1943, with its 3 “arms” at the top of the ship.

  • @og5462
    @og5462 19 дней назад

    will F/A 18 be better then f15 or f16 or worse?

    • @EhhSnowy
      @EhhSnowy 18 дней назад

      Worse.

    • @duncanmcgee13
      @duncanmcgee13 18 дней назад +1

      Just a tad slower but carries more weapons

  • @stevegao1294
    @stevegao1294 18 дней назад

    TEC, my first new year wish to you is for you and your love ones a great year, and my second one is for you to be aware of your excessive use of descriptive phrases like “Good old” and transition words like “and also.”

  • @fn8382
    @fn8382 18 дней назад +1

    Give me tirpitz

  • @namkhanhng1802
    @namkhanhng1802 18 дней назад

    When SepV3?

  • @petergray2712
    @petergray2712 18 дней назад +3

    True Fact: Due to Russia's inconsistent acquisitions of aircraft prior to the Ukraine War, its air force ended up with a hodgepodge of different SU-27/30/33 models, none of whom shared compatible major systems (engines, radars, avionics, etc....). This is one reason why the Russian Air Force was so reluctant to fight in contested Ukrainian airspace, as every single Sukhoi fighter it had was irreplaceable.

  • @rowanyuh6326
    @rowanyuh6326 19 дней назад

    I like the Sukhois they look cooler and make me feel like an underdog (bc they’re ass) Su-30SM2 is my favorite plane ever

  • @HughMann989
    @HughMann989 18 дней назад +1

    The Su-30SM would be a huge improvement to Russia’s top tier air because it has Thrust Vectoring that’s not specifically for VTOL. If Gaijin finally decides to fix the flight model of the Su-27 series and canards this will be an absolute beast, unmatched in close dogfights

  • @joshuapayne8187
    @joshuapayne8187 18 дней назад +1

    "ree" + "shuh" + "lyur" not the Richie lau

  • @KurenaiGram
    @KurenaiGram 18 дней назад

    Riche-Lee~Eu. Freaking Christ...

  • @s3nse1_official
    @s3nse1_official 18 дней назад

    Nah, its just poorly paitned f-16c and su-33

  • @usarmyalaskanick
    @usarmyalaskanick 19 дней назад +3

    If you made a video talking about the people who said “Eurofighter before FA18”, but also have stated the fa18 should’ve been added already, you’re a hypocrite and idiot. Stop talking about the hornet when you’ve made your feelings clear.

    • @AJS37_Viggen
      @AJS37_Viggen 19 дней назад

      cope

    • @dalh598.1
      @dalh598.1 19 дней назад

      A whole video complaining about people wanting its addition *in the current War Thunder environment....*
      Adding it in 2025 is a completely different animal than Adding it in 2024. It's not a complaint about the Hornet. It's a complaint about the disregard for game balance in the present day...
      If you can't recognize the difference between adding it now and adding it later... Yikes.

    • @usarmyalaskanick
      @usarmyalaskanick 19 дней назад +1

      @@dalh598.1 it goes to a minimum of 4 nations so no balance isn’t the issue in the slightest. Nothing the hornet had changes or pushes any kind of limitation from what we have no. So no.

    • @marshall-yo5ho
      @marshall-yo5ho 19 дней назад +1

      ​@@dalh598.1 F18 would literally be worse than th f16 and f15, what balance would it upset?

    • @dalh598.1
      @dalh598.1 19 дней назад

      @@marshall-yo5ho The F-15 and F-16 as platforms are worse than the F-18 in terms of tech and capability. Idk what you're talking about with it being worse...
      That being said, now that they've added the Rafale, Eurofighter, and F-15E, NOW there's no reason not to add the F-18 with *limited armament options*
      Now. (2025)
      Not before. (2024)
      Which is the whole point of my comment...

  • @nathansherman5684
    @nathansherman5684 18 дней назад +1

    New Top Tier American SPAA when? Something newer than the ADATS when? Somethingn on par with the Pantsir when??????

    • @treybirdo7223
      @treybirdo7223 18 дней назад

      More like top tier israel spaa when? Don't complain 🤣

    • @britishbred52
      @britishbred52 18 дней назад +2

      average usa main

    • @nathansherman5684
      @nathansherman5684 17 дней назад

      @@britishbred52 nah I main Japan, I just think it’s funny that America, despite developing AEGIS at least 20 years before everyone else, yet Russia has the best SPAA in the game 2x over?

    • @nathansherman5684
      @nathansherman5684 17 дней назад

      @@treybirdo7223 more like don’t pick copy paste M60s and expect something good???

    • @gunsblazing4509
      @gunsblazing4509 17 дней назад

      @@nathansherman5684 It's ironic because the vehicle most suited as a top tier Israeli SPAA was a collaboration between Israel and America, so yes, they are in fact in the right to expect something good

  • @PalexHorse
    @PalexHorse 19 дней назад +1

    YES YES YES YES YES
    I’m assuming several countries are going to get it other than America because it was operated by Australia, Canada, Finland, Spain, Kuwait, Malaysia, and Switzerland

  • @whitefalcon630
    @whitefalcon630 19 дней назад

    Lovely

  • @ThunderBerb
    @ThunderBerb 18 дней назад

    I pray for the SLAMRAAM

  • @jacky9590
    @jacky9590 19 дней назад

    more top tier garbage for snowball rb and CAS aids.

  • @capitainsheep1137
    @capitainsheep1137 19 дней назад

    premium su 30 indy or a SU 30 indie for birtain as squadron ? everyone bet down bellow

  • @hellonmyearth
    @hellonmyearth 18 дней назад

    Hope they put f/a 18 a (6 aim 7m, 2 aim 9m) on 13.0 and f/a 18 c (10 aim 120, 2 aim 9m on 13.7

  • @danielmoya6599
    @danielmoya6599 18 дней назад

    When the F/A-18 drops, Gajin should give Britian the CF-18, This could be a stong lineup for the Brits with the Typhoon FGR.4