Vivo x200 Pro First Impressions and Tests - ruclips.net/video/GZ0ywpJYUS8/видео.html Vivo's Origin OS Settings and Camera Tour - ruclips.net/video/JQuYehDKH1c/видео.html Vivo Street Photography - ruclips.net/video/IU8N10BsMQ4/видео.html Vivo x100 Ultra Best Cameraphone - ruclips.net/video/dlhC3E4bCQo/видео.html Large Photo/Video Battles: One True King: ruclips.net/video/5Cmdv1UTQys/видео.html Game of Phones - ruclips.net/video/1JqYFbSYen0/видео.html Infinity Phones - ruclips.net/video/ItoDkhOIIy4/видео.html Star Phones Ep2 - ruclips.net/video/dbPTwvks2as/видео.html Consider purchasing the luts and more: www.buymeacoffee.com/alientechno/extras Buy our Overlords a coffee to support the flow of their kindness www.buymeacoffee.com/alientechno TImestamps: 0:00 - Vivo x200 Pro 0:10 - Vivo x200 Pro vs x100 Ultra 0:22 - Everything Changed 1:05 - First Difference 1:51 - Huge Downgrade 3:35 - What is Good 4:48 - Noise 5:38 - Better Video Solution 5:54 - Huge Sensors Downgrade 7:28 - Why Vivo, Why 8:47 - Agency for Device 9:17 - Why Ultra Have a very cosmic day my friends! 🛸✨
Hey there! i appreciate your review video. I was a bit disappointed to hear that Vivo decided to make the sensor smaller. I also heard that the Vivo X200 Ultra has the same sensor as the Pro series, which is kind of a bummer. I'm really hoping that the Vivo X300 Pro will bring back a bigger sensor, or maybe even make it even bigger. I think that would really improve the image quality and make it look more natural.
Yes, I was opened for something new, but even after more than 4 gigs of updates, still a difference is very noticeable. May be if we do not zoom in, from the phone screen it will be okay, but I guess this logic can be applied to any smartphone, even iPhone. I will keep and eye on the firmware updates. If magic somehow happens, will make a video.
It depends my friend. For me Ultra still beats x200 Pro, speakers sound quality and photo aspects are very important, at the moment difference between 1x, 2x on faces is too drastic. For sure, in some aspects Pro is better, but it is not enough to switch for me personally, and I will wait for Ultra.
Bro I am a vivo fan, but sad to say X100 is not the king anymore. The Oppo find X8 pro is the new king of camera. it demolished the Vivo X200 pro, Iphone 16 pro max, Samsung s24 Ultra, Oneplus 13 pro in a camera showdown. Imaging if Oppo Find X8 release the Ultra version it also comes with a 1 inch lens sensor.
@@archie7288 are you blind? even without testing it, that fact that the X200 has a lens flare issue and vivo needs to recall all X200 series it will never be the king of camera.
Спасибо за ваши обзоры. Также стоял перед выбором между X100 Ultra и X200 Pro. Для меня важна камера в её максимальных возможностях, поэтому все таки взял X100 Ultra. Звук из динамиков у Ультры действительно лучше (не зря в верхней части на торце есть специальный вырез, у Pro такого нет, полноценный звук 2.0, а не полуторка как у X200 Pro), дисплей большего разрешения с большой плотностью пикселей (топовый Е7 от Samsung, у Pro более дешевый BOE). Еще люблю экраны водопады т.к. на них удобно делать жесты (свайп влево - назад, свайп вниз - выключение экрана, пользуюсь приложением Vivid N.G.). Еще была информация, что на X100 Ultra лучшая система микрофонов для записи звука (можно сравнить, но думаю так и есть, на X200 Pro она попроще). Ну и самое главное это система камер: 1. Ультраширокий объектив LYT-600 шире по углу обхвата на Ультре (был у меня X100 Pro, не хватало ширины, очень близкое фокусное расстояние к основному объективу), на X200 Pro ширик перешел с прошлогоднего X100 Pro. 2. Дюймовая основа LYT-900 в Ультре это топовый сенсор для настоящих камерофонов, есть только в трех топовых смартфонах 2024 года. Результаты в вашем сравнении вполне наглядны. В X200 Pro конструктивная особенность в блике, который появляется чаще, чем в Ультре. Китайцы убирают его теперь программно в автоматическом режиме на последней версии ПО X200 Pro, но всё равно не приятно. 3. Жирный телевик Samsung ISOCELL HP9 вроде и там и там, но X100 Ultra фокусируется с 11-12 см., а телевик X200 Pro с 14 см. Судя по всему в X200 Pro проще система линз на телевике. Я макрофотографии делаю часто, для меня это тоже важно. 4. Селфикамера на X200 Pro перешла с прошлогоднего X100 Pro, она без автофокуса. Дырка в экране на X200 Pro больше, не так приятно потреблять контент в полноэкранном режиме. Это еще раз подтверждает что X100 Ultra это аппарат, который во всем Ультра. За X200 Pro: 1. Новый процессор Dimensity 9400, быстрый и энергоэффективный. Мне Медиатек стал больше нравиться, чем Снапдрагон. 2. АКБ 6000 махов, в долгую и при ресурсных задачах думаю будет гораздо автономнее X100 Ultra.
@@MrTromb86 Спасибо за просмотр друже. Согласен со всем. Сейчас тестирую raw и sraw , там положение получше, но всё равно недотягивает. И 99% не будут заморачиваться с обработкой файлов, когда как на Ultra можно снимать в обычном режиме и получать хорошее изображение.
@@AlienTechnologies33 Привет! Спасибо за видео. Действительно ли по ощущениям система микрофонов у X100 ultra лучше X200 pro, как сказал комментатор выше? Обзоры создают двоякое впечатление да и у самих обзорщиков немного разнятся мнения. Не могу выбрать между этими двумя моделями, беру в основном для подсъёмов концертов (играю на барабанах в коммерческих группах), чтобы потом выкладывать в соцсети свои и коллективов. Поэтому ориентируюсь на съёмку в плохом освещении и на запись звука в первую очередь. По видео вроде неплохо у прошки идёт, но со звуком мне лично пока не очень понятно, у кого как в обзорах. Хочется больше x200 pro, подкупает автономность сильно и меня лично его экран как-то больше привлекает, не люблю водопады, но если всё-таки он сильно будет уступать съёмке в моих условиях, то лучше взять ультру. Может будет совет по этому поводу?
@РусланШагиахметов-к7м Если только для видео, можно x200 pro, у меня прошлое видео "Best Midrange?" Есть там сравнение видео и звука, конечно не во время концерта, но может помочь. Планирую более подробный обзор делать скоро.
Thanks a bunch for comparing these two! I'm torn honestly. I wanted to get a x200 Pro global/funtouch OS version for photography and keep telling myself that these results would improve with upcoming software updates but not sure now.😢😢😢
I am in a similar situation right now. For me Camera is the most important thing so I was hoping vivo would keep the camera same but they didn't. At the same time it is difficult to buy a previous model knowing the improvements in battery size and performance (3nm chips).
They might improve the camera performance as they did with previous models. Knowing they pushed around 5-6 updates to polish the ultra experience lately. But at the same time, physics cannot be completely ignored and the sensor size shortcomings are obvious for portrait shots. I'm pretty sure the phone will be performing great for a variety of scenes except portraits on the main camera.
@@AlexR-wk6zf Yep that's why I'm also waiting to see more detailed comparisons with the raws.. see how much is related to processing and how much is raw lens/sensor difference
Thank you for the very good comparisons, such an underrated channel, you deserve more subs, but keep going hard work always pays off. From your videos i conclude and my choice is x100 Ultra, It doesn't matter how old something is, in my opinion the quality remains in terms of camera hardware, x200 is great phone too. It is nice to see Vivo that's doing innovative stuff in many fields, and still competing and beating Iphone, Samsung etc.
@@palashgaur1650 I think that it is possible to achieve, but I doubt that it will be drastic, because x200 Ultra need to be sold, and we know, that the more we buy, the more we save, problem solved 👾 But I hope to see some improvements
Yes it is, but I find it to be a minor problem, nothing to worry about compare to sensor size. Any phone can have flares in one way or another, but on x200 pro, under certain angles it just can be more obvious.
Bro honestly which one do you prefer x100 pro or x200 pro? Comparison would be helpful. But honest opinion? Because i wanna buy any 2 of these. If 200 ultra shows ups with 1 inch sensor. Im going for that. If not i might stick on to proS.
@@SidheeqV-w4o if we are talking about x100 PRO vs x200 PRO, and you enjoy to use 3x always, I recommend x200 Pro, because HP9 telephoto 3.7x is really nice, 85mm equivalent in 1/1.4 inch is really strong
bro, how many camera updates have you noticed since unboxing this beast? I heard there was a significant improvements in the camera after about 3-4 updates compared to straight out of the box.
Feels like quite the difference on the camera part from your previous one hour video no? Seemed much closer in the last video with both Is the new mode an OS5 thing or will x100 ultra keep all the manual options even on OS5? Wonder if x200 pro has any advantages other than battery and video once the zoom updates come to the ultra.
@@svenmuchow-tiktokads I feel like the same, on the main 1x, 2x part I said that Ultra looks more natural for my eye. Here I just talked about obvious visible differences. Telephoto is almost the same, except new computation that makes image more artificial, that I try to turn off. On previous video lots of comments was about how Pro beats Ultra in almost all aspects, so I wanted to point out and make it more clear. Also by the way, selfie on Pro does not have autofocus. I usually make first impressions, and than try to make in depth photo/video battle. And after that I make long term final review
@@svenmuchow-tiktokads That 1 hour video is just first impressions after 1 day of use, I made it almost overnight. Next third video will be in-depth, it will be called "Star Phones Episode 3"
hi mate. i follow your reviews with pleasure. i use x100 ultra. i updated it to originOS 5 beta. after the updates, x100 ultra now takes artificial shots like x200 pro. while it used to make 10x digital shots like optical, now artificial sharpness and watercolour effect dominate in 10x shots. Did you have originOS 4 on the x100 ultra while you were doing these tests? or did you update the device? what are your impressions?
Hello my friend, Origin OS4. Thats why i am not so shure about updating to OS5. Try to remove sharpness slider all the way down. To tell the truth i enjoy dedicated Night Mode and Astro mode, i really wish they just made an Astro button, so phone knows that i want to shoot stars
@@AlienTechnologies33 There are no problems with skin tones. The real problem is the fake sharpness at 10x and 20x, unnatural images, and focusing problems in macro mode.
main camera on the x200 U will be the same as x200 Pro but bigger focal length and aperture correct ? Then the other improvement that x200 U will offer is the ultra wide camera. So if the main focus is photography would the main camera of X100 U with the 1 inch sensor still be better? Or can bigger focal lengths and apertures compensate for the smaller sensor in the upcoming x200 U ?
@@jamesfitzes5771 sensor size is really impactful. I want to see better sensor technology, like "Back Side Illumination", "Stacking of layers", may be physical shutter. 0.2 aperture increase won't change anything
@@AlienTechnologies33 It would be nice if the X200 U keeps the same 1 inch sensor and further improves it... I highly doubt they will unfortunately and will go with the LYT 818
@@AlienTechnologies33 Yes, Vivo is going to use the Lyt 818, but with a 35mm optical focal length, which is technically much better than the Lyt 900 cropped to 35mm. It's like comparing 1/1.28 (Lyt 818) to 1/1.5 (Lyt 900). The 23mm focal length is not practical for real-time usage; it's too wide for the main lens and too narrow for the ultra-wide lens. It’s essentially a compromised focal length designed for smartphones due to size constraints. Additionally, they will be using two Lyt 818 sensors for the main and ultra-wide lenses, which could allow for some interesting fusion effects as well.
Hi, could you help me test the X200Pro's performance in night scenes at ISO 204800? I feel there is too much noise at that setting. When I used the X100Pro in astro mode for extreme night scenes, the noise was much cleaner compared to the X200Pro.
@@ImYellow95 Hey, Orange. 🍊 Yes, I have already made couple of tests, can confirm, extreme low light, dark room, handheld, x200 pro does this gazillion ISO, vs x100 Ultra 65.000, and in some small small parts, on Pro we have very very vague and almost unnoticeable more defined textures, but with dirty image everywhere, black textured noisy patches across all image
Thanks again for the comparison! If you do decide to update your x100ultra to Origin OS5, could you perhaps take a few 10x and 20x photos on Origin 4, and after the update to origin 5 the same 10x and 20x shots ? I am curious to see if the rumours of degraded camera performance of the x100ultra on origin OS5 are true
@@stickmennoeller some people say that it has more aggressive drawing. I can see that in x200 Pro, may be they tried to hide main sensor flaws by that, but on x200 pro 10x and above are more aggressive, even if you turn off new "telephoto enhancements", which I used to show the difference in next video, but do not recommend, image becomes more like second tele on Oppo
@AlienTechnologies33 thanks for the reply! Yes I am definitely not a fan of the super artificial drawing, that's why I hope that the x100 ultra doesn't have it on origin OS 5, like some people are saying
@@stickmennoeller Just thought I would chime in as well, I have an X100 Ultra, and I have OS5 Beta, igs has a couple of updates now. I would say the zoom images at 10x and above still look as they did.
First of all, thank you very much for these wonderful reviews. When I first saw your channel a few months ago, I was very happy saying "this is the channel I was looking for" and subscribed immediately. I appreciate your efforts, reviews and comments and I watch you with pleasure. Now I have a question for you, or rather I need your advice. I would be very happy if you could help. I am very interested in smartphones and technology, but despite this, I am not someone who changes phones very often. My current phone is a 7-year-old Android phone with a lot of problems. Therefore, it is high time to change my phone. I want to buy a very good phone since I plan to use it for a long time. The thing I expect the most from a smartphone is that its camera and performance are good. I like Vivo's camera performance or shots more than any other phone. It appeals to me more, especially street photography is my area of interest. I saw this in the x100 Ultra and was amazed, and now there is the x200 Pro model. I am torn between these two phones. I am also thinking about whether I should wait for the x200 Ultra. By the way, if I understood correctly, you said that the x200 Pro was behind the x100 Utra in street photography or that it did not have an HDR feature. However, when I watched other review videos, I saw some who said that there was not much difference between the shots of the two devices and showed their shots. This is exactly the issue that made me think with your comment and review and I became pessimistic. Do you have any advice for me on what I should do about this? Your comments are important to me. Sorry, it was a bit long. Thank you in advance. 🌌
Friend if you want to keep your new phone 5-7 years buy Samsung , or pixel phone ,only them have 5+ years of support for update , vivo and the others have 3 years tops I think
Thank you for watching my friend. I am in the process of making large photo comparsion. I did not watch any reviewers about x200bpro, but from what I can see even without zooming photos, that there is a difference, and when I zoom in to look closely in some areas I see huge difference. Even on video, I thought that noise problem won't be that big, but after couple of tests I can say, that I just cant use x200 pro for video the same way as I use x100 Ultra. Any way. I will make this new video and will return to your comment.
@@jojopolnareff370 Hello, nice to see you my friend 🕯️✨🌌 I can agree, but also want to mention, that I used my previous phones without updating them purposely, and had no problems. Also, if they promise 5+ years, does not mean that they will do it regularly, for example they can do it not very often, with small and not very useful updates. For example, in lots of areas Samsung and Pixel are already outdated to the point, that no firmware update can fix it even in 5 years. So it depends.
@@Ubrmnch After next "Star Phones Episode 3" I will make Final review video of each phone individually, will say what they have and what they lack. This is the last big video this year for smartphones, I want summ it up and switch to some other tech
@@AlienTechnologies33 🎉🎉🎉🎉👑👑👑👑 that's is true , with your video my hopes are down a lot with 200pro , I hope 200 ultra will follow the step of 100uktra in terms of photo/video software and feeling in the hand etc with the best sensors
Complimenti bellissimo video..Qui in Italia i recensori fanno recensioni " bonificate" a Samsung e Apple..Ho iniziato con Xiaomi 13 ultra,e 14 Ultra dove hanno file Raw eccezionali, ma nel punta e scatta " Jpeg " sbagliava" in modalita Leica Autentico su Xiaomi 14 ultra troppo contrasto,sbagliava spesso esposizione...Con questo Vivo X100 Ultra ho trovato versatilità e coerenza. CONSIDERAZIONI PERSONALI
@@eddybushido6687 Grazie per aver guardato amico. ecco perché, dopo tutti i telefoni, ho scelto Vivo. Un risultato versatile, prevedibile e di alta qualità. giorni spaziali, per te amico ✨🛸🌌
D'accordissimo con te. Sul punta e scatta, Vivo non si batte. Penso che siamo tra i pochissimi italiani a possedere il Vivo X 100 Ultra, e onestamente gli altri non sanno che si perdono!
Assolutamente d'accordo da possessore di Vivo X100 Ultra non saprei con cosa cambiarlo è strepitoso su tutto, io faccio foto di natura, insetti e fiori ed è imbattibile! Grazie del video sei sempre speciale!
@marcellosalvarani3315 è un dispositivo che ha molte qualità importanti, tra cui la batteria /ore di schermo "in un giorno arrivo a sera al 30-35%,dopo aver fatto tante foto /video /visto RUclips, girando per la città" quindi tanti cambi cella"cioè ne provo/cambio tanti di Telefoni*mia malattia da Neuro 🤣
Ultra version of Vivo is intended for China only. Go and get the Oppo Find X8 pro its the new king of camera, it demolished the Vivo x200 pro, samsung s24 ultra, iphone 16 pro max and Oneplus 13 pro. Imagine if the Oppo find X8 Ultra will be release, it also comes with a 1 inch lens sensor and it is a global version.
Thank you my friend ✨ Phones are just a tools, and they'd better be a good ones, for the money they ask. Want to see what will be in a 5 years from now 🛸
Very good comparison. ❤️ I have a X200P and I agree on most things. I bought it for the telephoto, because that's what I use the most. The main sensor is "good enough" for my usage, but yes, it is a downgrade from the Ultra.
@@LordAngelus Thank you for watching my friend. x200 Pro is nice phone. And I agree, telephoto is the most interesting here, and on that front everything is more than good 🦾 If you shoot sRaw situation on main lens will be better. Despite photography shenanigans, x200 Pro has lots of strong points, and I find results among other devices in the same category more than good enough ✨
Thank you my friend. I am testing Raw right now, situation is slightly better, but still, 1 inch is stronger, when phone is stacking multiple photos together, this slightly becomes noticeable, and on purerly auto mode difference is huge. Ultra can easily replace apsc for me, but on Pro I am not so shure.
Oooh i was really shocked that the X200 Pro doesnt have the astro and supermoon mode! Btw, currently the X100s Pro cost is now $675 usd, while the X200 Pro cost $900 in my place. Which is better between the two? Im kinda leaning towards the X100s Pro as it has its own astro+supermoon mode which I always use for star gazing photograhy, and its much more cheaper as well.
@@PhoenyxuzPrimax New landscape mode has it all built in, it gives potential for new angles and lenses, for example moon and stars with buildings or clouds in the background. But I really wish we still had this buttons, so phone 100% knows that we want to shoot stars or/and moon. More buttons and agency over device is far superior than relying on scene detections. To tell the truth I have not tested 100s pro, but HP9 telephoto is very strong on x200 pro, but main sensor is noticeable downgrade in photography. I bought x200 pro for 900$ but it has maximum ram and storage, and it feels little bit too expensive for what it is, not everyone will agree, but I'd rather buy old Ultra or wait for new one, or saved money on x100s Pro (but again I have not tested it, take it with skepticism), because x200 Pro has downgrade on main sensor, 15mm ultrawide is tight for me, selfie camera has no autofocus, HP9 tele for macro has longer focus distance, speakers are noticeably worse at least 3 stars vs 4 stars out 5, and new wide screen design is not so comfortable for 1 hand use. Hard to really give any recommendations, but here are my thoughts. I do not think that you will regret any phone, x100s pro, x200 pro, x100 ultra, you will get nice photo/video experience.
@@PhoenyxuzPrimax if you use sRaw photos on x200 pro on main sensor, gap will be slightly closer, texture on the skin will be better, but still compared to ultra it is a downgrade even in sRaw and Raw. May be they can fix it with firmware, but I press "X" to doubt.
@@PhoenyxuzPrimax but on video we see noticable boost, to tell the truth it feels like just a software gatekeeping, no way my old Mi9 did 4k 60 fps in log, but snapdragon 8 gen 3 can't. But x200 pro has built in log on 60 fps with all lenses, and vivo log is kinda nice, but not the basic LUT, I used my custom made, may be will post it on "buy me a coffee" for free when I am not lazy and in a good mood
Thank you for your review Sir! I want to buy a camera phone and I still can pick one between the Xiaomi 14 ultra, the vivo x100 ultra and the x200 pro. I want to buy one for mobile photography and vlog. I want to create content online. Between these 3 flagships, which one will be the most efficient for a beginner?
@@julmistefilsnoel527 For video I suggest to look at the dji osmo pocket 3. If you absolutely need a video on a phone, all of them can do a job, may be x200 Pro will be better for video, it has Log, it has better night video. But for Photography I defenetly suggest Xiaomi 14 Ultra and Vivo x100 Ultra, x200 Pro in my opinion is not there, not bad, but not top performer, if you are alright with Raw editing, x200 Pro can be done, but again in my opinion is not on the same level as Xiaomi or Vivo Ultra.
I agree with you on pure photography. But if you want all android features and avoid many workarounds, the global x200 pro is the best option. I used an x fold 3 pro Chinese version for 5 months and i sold it because I got tired of having to tweak everything for it to work.
Yes my friend, agree. Thats why i said that for average smartphone user it will be better to buy Pro model, new features, better battery, for less money. Right now i am using Ultra, had to initially config, but i can use Galaxy Watch on wear os, i have calls and notifications no problem, NFC with cards, etc. Of course i wish it had all the features, like BlueLM Copilot, Jovi Assistant with different languages etc.
If you do not care about pixel peeps, x200 pro will be better, you can occasionally use HP9 telephoto for more natural portraits. Video will be better on Pro. Speakers will be worse on Pro.
@Lax241PL Need to do more real world tests on Pro. It depends on what I do, anything from 6 to 9 hours on Ultra. After day photo/video tests difference was 6% at roughly 80% battery
@@patkluivert4110 we can see less or even no interpolation lines right now on Pro, which is good, but the same image quality degradation as on normal portraits with main sensor. In this video there is one example, running girl, face is more artificial, and texture on the hat has mushiness, stitches and fabric are very distorted.
@@NS-cd7jn Do not know for sure, but it should be close. To tell the truth for portraits I love this new telephoto, it gives very cool faces and textures of skin. So I kinda still can recommend x200 pro in this regard. But Ultra is so good, may be you can find a good deal, right now it is possible to find Ultra for the price of x200 Pro.
@AlienTechnologies33 Not available in my region. But you mentioned soft skin textures and lack of details in people's faces because of the smaller sensor? Is that right?
On Ultra is better, but it depends on how it is being used by a software. x100 Ultra will be better for skin, face, real textures, while x200 Pro can potentially give better videos. It all depends on app, software implementation.
When we see the work that you provide, the tests that you carry out with unparalleled attention to detail in the photographic approach, then yes I agree with you in your conclusion. The x200Pro is an excellent device in all respects but the x100U is much more subtle in its management of cameras and which is close to a DSLR rendering as the 14U does too. I'm waiting to see what the brands will offer us in 2025 with their Ultra and my choice will come. Greetings 👽
Awesome, looking forward to the complete video! I've seen people rave about the Oppo Find X8 Pro, which is making it even harder to pick a phone now, but mostly I think Vivo has me hooked.
@@frikkenI23 To tell the truth I do not think that difference will be that drastic. Until we get something completly new, like large sensor on ultra wide, big sensor on selfie that slides moves up and down from under the screen, or even larger sensor size on other lenses, or stacked bsi that can have continuous computation raw in a buffer. Until than I think results will be +- the same
@@AlienTechnologies33 yeah, I guess the X100 Ultra might be the best around until something like that comes along. I saw you showcase the X200's nighttime video and stuff, people seemed to like it and give the point to the 200, but to be honest I take dark footage of dark enviorments over blue brigtened footage any day of the week as long as photos still turn out good, so I really think there's nothing pointing me towards the X200 unless the Ultra gets a global release. That's an upside with the Oppo, it's global, but it doesn't have the color science as on-point as Vivo, and the stuff like tuning sharpening, which seems awesome to have on the Vivo.
@@frikkenI23 sometimes when I am bored, I play around with settings, tweak sharpness, brightness, contrast, saturation, now I like to play around with "textured" color profile. This feature along gives fresh feelings to stale smartphone market. That's why I like it. That I have different options. If I want to give a smile and interest on the face of friends and family, I turn on face retouching portraits, they every time ask to look, start to zoom and ask to send them photo. Love all this options. I think that first of all smartphone should give fun and emotions. I loved Oppo also, but always wish it gave me ability to play with settings. It is not only a "serious" tool, but also a toy to bring emotions.
@@AlienTechnologies33 I totally agree, a phone-camera needs to have some soul to it. It's a bit of a bummer that no one has made a comparison of the Oppo and the X100 Ultra yet though, people make ones with the X200 Pro, but Vivo's best, no-compromise camera seems to absolutely be the X100 Ultra, so I think they should compare with that as well. do you agree?
@@AlienTechnologies33 oh man, there's been a development! Someone in my area is selling a Find X7 Ultra with 100% battery health for 580 USD. for comparison, the Vivo with the same amount of storage would cost me 1050 USD, and the new Oppo Pro, which is really only tempting because it's global, is tipped to cost about 1100 USD. You're the expert, what do you think I should do?
X200 pro ночью намного интереснее будет, особенно в видео. За счёт более мощного процессора в связке с более качественной обработкой и более светосильной матрицей.
Единственный минус, очень заметный, x200 Pro не даёт такую настоящую фотографию в 1х и 2х, кожа и детали теряются и подрисовываются, делая лицо более пластиковым, теряется вся магия. Можно использовать Raw и sRaw, но Ultra всё равно будет лучше, с большим количеством деталей и в более трудных условиях съёмки
X200 Pro has better HDR both in photos and in videos and I think it's an important point you haven't reported. Let me also add that X100 Ultra got more updates than X200 Pro, which will be released worldwide and will receive much more updates and tweaks in the future than X200 Ultra. Maybe you should make a new comparison in 6 months, when X200 Pro will be as mature as X100 Ultra.
@@maxel7723 I have reported in a previous video, but this hdr difference is minor and I will take old hdr performance over performance of faces on x200 Pro
@@maxel7723 if magic happens I will make a new video. But right now after more than 4 gigs of updates, the gap is too big for me. I do not think that something can be done here. I hope they do not include this sensor in x200 Ultra
What's the point of keeping the dinner plate sized camera bump if the cameras are downgraded. The ultra version better have a 1" type of sensor, but I doubt it and it probably won't even go global.
Guess I'm gonna wait for the Xiaomi 15 Ultra to launch in India then, X200 pro seemed to good to be true without that 1 inch main sensor, I was willing to take the ultra wide and front camera downgrades too if the new smaller sensor indeed performed as well as the 1 inch one, but alas, and with rumours indicating that the X200 Ultra too will have the same primary as the X200 pro really does make Xiaomi suddenly pop to the top of my next smartphone contenders list.
May be magic happens with firmware updates, but I highly doubt it. X200 pro is very nice device, but defenetly, there is a threshold for image quality on sensor size I guess.
Yes, I also read the news that the sensor will be smaller in the x200 ultra, but there are also news that they will use 2 telephoto cameras, which means more detailed and crazy sharp photos when zoomed in.
@@vaibhavisunildattmore hard question, depends on what you want to achieve and what price and deal you can get. I feel like x200 will be better overall
Damn, I didn’t knew they got rid of all the dedicated astro, moon mode for automatic scene detection, such a big let down. That was the reason i hated pixels, iphones, shame vivo is just blindly following them.
I am making more tests right now, looks like this Landscape mode works, but i really wish it had dedicated button, so i know for sure that it doing what i want it to do. Also it has night/tripod button, it only appears on the screen if phone detects low light or no motion, yesterday i tried to shoot stars with small wind on a clumsy tripod and this tripod button was constantly appearing and disappearing, had to wait till wind stops or tried to click the button as soon as it appeared. It is still better than on most of the phones, but i wish everything was manual. Some people do not even know that Ultra has nigh video mode, because button appears only in low light when scene is detected.
@saurav4180 Yes, all the same, only "Supermoon" and "Astro default" now is built in to scene detection, potentially it can give new options and angles, but I still think that there should be buttons.
hope origin OS5 will not change the Camara App on the x100ultra like it is on x200pro.Loosing manuel control😑 i will wait with updating till somebody has testet it
@@AlienTechnologies33Seems like Origin OS5 did not downgraded anything in the Camera App👍🏼 The Zoom is smoother now.Allready got a second little Update on Origin OS5.
x100 ultra night mode photos are far inferior, the model they use to define the shapes and objects is outdated, yes on daylight is slighly better, but still I think nothing beats the x200 pro on night photography as for video, there is no shakiness like the x100 ultra, so x200 pro is more usable, unless you used third party applications but none of them have mic noise isolation
@@pontiacgtx4801 For photos actually I am making tests, and do not find right now night mode better on Pro, especially in extreme conditions. As for video, I agree that Pro is better, software gatekeeping etc, but to tell the truth, for anything more than social media, messaging, I will use Pocket 1 or 3, and for tripod I like mirorless. But of course having good video is always better than having bad one.
@@SidheeqV-w4o may be we can collectively make a feedback. I see a trend with more processing over natural image. But 35 mm sounds fun. I heard that Nubia z70 will have 1 inch with 35mm also.
@@AlienTechnologies33 I would love to see that, but real focal lenght is over 13mm, so it won't happen soon. At the moment I'm pleased with x100 ultra camera performance.
If people do not care about zooming at the photo, may be it can be okay, x200 Pro can still use HP9 telephoto for more natural portraits. Video will be better. But having this two phones side by side, my honest thoughts, that I will still keep using Ultra. Hope to see improvement in x200 Ultra 🛸 preferably triple foldable 🦾
it does not on video, if you realize there will be an annoying micro jump of the sensor when recording that is fixed on the x200 pro and wont be fixed on the x100 ultra
@@young2125 For photography ultra is so strong. On x200 pro I need to use raw to try and get something similar on main sensor. I want Ultra cameras in triple foldable body 🛸
По-моему динамики звучат скорее как 3 и 3.5 из 5, а не 2 и 4 As for me, speakers sound more like 3 and 3.5 out of 5, not 2 and 4, not so big difference
difference is huge in person, even on this video when i listen in the headphones or on laptop it is so obvious, like defined strings and bells vs almost nothing
На 5 звучит Honor Magic 6 Ultimate, очень хороший звук, даже жаль его продавать из-за этого взамен на x200 Pro, но фотографирует он конечно не так как звучит...
Vivo x200 Pro First Impressions and Tests - ruclips.net/video/GZ0ywpJYUS8/видео.html
Vivo's Origin OS Settings and Camera Tour - ruclips.net/video/JQuYehDKH1c/видео.html
Vivo Street Photography - ruclips.net/video/IU8N10BsMQ4/видео.html
Vivo x100 Ultra Best Cameraphone - ruclips.net/video/dlhC3E4bCQo/видео.html
Large Photo/Video Battles:
One True King: ruclips.net/video/5Cmdv1UTQys/видео.html
Game of Phones - ruclips.net/video/1JqYFbSYen0/видео.html
Infinity Phones - ruclips.net/video/ItoDkhOIIy4/видео.html
Star Phones Ep2 - ruclips.net/video/dbPTwvks2as/видео.html
Consider purchasing the luts and more:
www.buymeacoffee.com/alientechno/extras
Buy our Overlords a coffee to support the flow of their kindness
www.buymeacoffee.com/alientechno
TImestamps:
0:00 - Vivo x200 Pro
0:10 - Vivo x200 Pro vs x100 Ultra
0:22 - Everything Changed
1:05 - First Difference
1:51 - Huge Downgrade
3:35 - What is Good
4:48 - Noise
5:38 - Better Video Solution
5:54 - Huge Sensors Downgrade
7:28 - Why Vivo, Why
8:47 - Agency for Device
9:17 - Why Ultra
Have a very cosmic day my friends! 🛸✨
Hey there! i appreciate your review video. I was a bit disappointed to hear that Vivo decided to make the sensor smaller. I also heard that the Vivo X200 Ultra has the same sensor as the Pro series, which is kind of a bummer. I'm really hoping that the Vivo X300 Pro will bring back a bigger sensor, or maybe even make it even bigger. I think that would really improve the image quality and make it look more natural.
Yes, I was opened for something new, but even after more than 4 gigs of updates, still a difference is very noticeable. May be if we do not zoom in, from the phone screen it will be okay, but I guess this logic can be applied to any smartphone, even iPhone.
I will keep and eye on the firmware updates. If magic somehow happens, will make a video.
X100 ultra still king 2024. 1 inch sensor give a deep image like a mirrorless
Nah x200 pro is better
It depends my friend. For me Ultra still beats x200 Pro, speakers sound quality and photo aspects are very important, at the moment difference between 1x, 2x on faces is too drastic.
For sure, in some aspects Pro is better, but it is not enough to switch for me personally, and I will wait for Ultra.
Bro I am a vivo fan, but sad to say X100 is not the king anymore. The Oppo find X8 pro is the new king of camera. it demolished the Vivo X200 pro, Iphone 16 pro max, Samsung s24 Ultra, Oneplus 13 pro in a camera showdown. Imaging if Oppo Find X8 release the Ultra version it also comes with a 1 inch lens sensor.
@@archie7288 are you blind? even without testing it, that fact that the X200 has a lens flare issue and vivo needs to recall all X200 series it will never be the king of camera.
@@gee620 nah vivo can shoot 4k 120fps + dolby vision, so much better in taking moving object pictures so clear, better zoom capability.
The video is good. Most reviewers not see the difference between 1 inch type sensor and new smaller one. Alien Technologies does though.
X100 Ultra Unbeatable Camera King for now but really hope this to change with X200 Ultra, thnx pal no other utubr tells the real truth, keep em coming
Спасибо за ваши обзоры. Также стоял перед выбором между X100 Ultra и X200 Pro. Для меня важна камера в её максимальных возможностях, поэтому все таки взял X100 Ultra.
Звук из динамиков у Ультры действительно лучше (не зря в верхней части на торце есть специальный вырез, у Pro такого нет, полноценный звук 2.0, а не полуторка как у X200 Pro), дисплей большего разрешения с большой плотностью пикселей (топовый Е7 от Samsung, у Pro более дешевый BOE). Еще люблю экраны водопады т.к. на них удобно делать жесты (свайп влево - назад, свайп вниз - выключение экрана, пользуюсь приложением Vivid N.G.). Еще была информация, что на X100 Ultra лучшая система микрофонов для записи звука (можно сравнить, но думаю так и есть, на X200 Pro она попроще). Ну и самое главное это система камер:
1. Ультраширокий объектив LYT-600 шире по углу обхвата на Ультре (был у меня X100 Pro, не хватало ширины, очень близкое фокусное расстояние к основному объективу), на X200 Pro ширик перешел с прошлогоднего X100 Pro.
2. Дюймовая основа LYT-900 в Ультре это топовый сенсор для настоящих камерофонов, есть только в трех топовых смартфонах 2024 года. Результаты в вашем сравнении вполне наглядны. В X200 Pro конструктивная особенность в блике, который появляется чаще, чем в Ультре. Китайцы убирают его теперь программно в автоматическом режиме на последней версии ПО X200 Pro, но всё равно не приятно.
3. Жирный телевик Samsung ISOCELL HP9 вроде и там и там, но X100 Ultra фокусируется с 11-12 см., а телевик X200 Pro с 14 см. Судя по всему в X200 Pro проще система линз на телевике. Я макрофотографии делаю часто, для меня это тоже важно.
4. Селфикамера на X200 Pro перешла с прошлогоднего X100 Pro, она без автофокуса. Дырка в экране на X200 Pro больше, не так приятно потреблять контент в полноэкранном режиме. Это еще раз подтверждает что X100 Ultra это аппарат, который во всем Ультра.
За X200 Pro:
1. Новый процессор Dimensity 9400, быстрый и энергоэффективный. Мне Медиатек стал больше нравиться, чем Снапдрагон.
2. АКБ 6000 махов, в долгую и при ресурсных задачах думаю будет гораздо автономнее X100 Ultra.
@@MrTromb86 Спасибо за просмотр друже. Согласен со всем. Сейчас тестирую raw и sraw , там положение получше, но всё равно недотягивает. И 99% не будут заморачиваться с обработкой файлов, когда как на Ultra можно снимать в обычном режиме и получать хорошее изображение.
@@AlienTechnologies33 Привет! Спасибо за видео. Действительно ли по ощущениям система микрофонов у X100 ultra лучше X200 pro, как сказал комментатор выше? Обзоры создают двоякое впечатление да и у самих обзорщиков немного разнятся мнения. Не могу выбрать между этими двумя моделями, беру в основном для подсъёмов концертов (играю на барабанах в коммерческих группах), чтобы потом выкладывать в соцсети свои и коллективов. Поэтому ориентируюсь на съёмку в плохом освещении и на запись звука в первую очередь. По видео вроде неплохо у прошки идёт, но со звуком мне лично пока не очень понятно, у кого как в обзорах. Хочется больше x200 pro, подкупает автономность сильно и меня лично его экран как-то больше привлекает, не люблю водопады, но если всё-таки он сильно будет уступать съёмке в моих условиях, то лучше взять ультру. Может будет совет по этому поводу?
@РусланШагиахметов-к7м Если только для видео, можно x200 pro, у меня прошлое видео "Best Midrange?" Есть там сравнение видео и звука, конечно не во время концерта, но может помочь. Планирую более подробный обзор делать скоро.
@РусланШагиахметов-к7м Некоторые обзорщики включают кнопку "Vocal Enchantment" и говорят что звук как из бочки, хотя эта функция и подавляет шум
Thanks a bunch for comparing these two! I'm torn honestly. I wanted to get a x200 Pro global/funtouch OS version for photography and keep telling myself that these results would improve with upcoming software updates but not sure now.😢😢😢
Also torn.. really want the more natural looking main sensor, but also really want the improvements to video capture/battery/performance
I am in a similar situation right now. For me Camera is the most important thing so I was hoping vivo would keep the camera same but they didn't. At the same time it is difficult to buy a previous model knowing the improvements in battery size and performance (3nm chips).
They might improve the camera performance as they did with previous models. Knowing they pushed around 5-6 updates to polish the ultra experience lately. But at the same time, physics cannot be completely ignored and the sensor size shortcomings are obvious for portrait shots. I'm pretty sure the phone will be performing great for a variety of scenes except portraits on the main camera.
@@AlexR-wk6zf Yep that's why I'm also waiting to see more detailed comparisons with the raws.. see how much is related to processing and how much is raw lens/sensor difference
Hello my friends. I will keep an eye on the firmware updates. If magic happens, I will surely make an update and video with street photography
Thank you for the very good comparisons, such an underrated channel, you deserve more subs, but keep going hard work always pays off.
From your videos i conclude and my choice is x100 Ultra, It doesn't matter how old something is, in my opinion the quality remains in terms of camera hardware, x200 is great phone too.
It is nice to see Vivo that's doing innovative stuff in many fields, and still competing and beating Iphone, Samsung etc.
@@draganknezevic5019 Thank you my friend 📺✨🌌
Amazing work. Do you you think the video of X100 Ultra will improve with software updates?
Thanks!!
I suspect part of the difference may be the smaller main sensor allows for faster/more efficient data processing which can result in smoother video
@@palashgaur1650 I think that it is possible to achieve, but I doubt that it will be drastic, because x200 Ultra need to be sold, and we know, that the more we buy, the more we save, problem solved 👾
But I hope to see some improvements
Thanks for the video is there a flare lens issue with
x 200 pro
Yes it is, but I find it to be a minor problem, nothing to worry about compare to sensor size. Any phone can have flares in one way or another, but on x200 pro, under certain angles it just can be more obvious.
@AlienTechnologies33 thanks a lot
Bro honestly which one do you prefer x100 pro or x200 pro?
Comparison would be helpful. But honest opinion? Because i wanna buy any 2 of these. If 200 ultra shows ups with 1 inch sensor. Im going for that. If not i might stick on to proS.
@@SidheeqV-w4o if we are talking about x100 PRO vs x200 PRO, and you enjoy to use 3x always, I recommend x200 Pro, because HP9 telephoto 3.7x is really nice, 85mm equivalent in 1/1.4 inch is really strong
@AlienTechnologies33 oh oky.😁
bro, how many camera updates have you noticed since unboxing this beast? I heard there was a significant improvements in the camera after about 3-4 updates compared to straight out of the box.
I loved the video, sir. May I ask where you got the cover for the x100 Ultra, please?
@@XenonVonDoom AliExpress, I just put "phone name protection case or protection glass/film"
Been waiting for this.
Thanks as always :-)
🕯️✨🛸🌌
Feels like quite the difference on the camera part from your previous one hour video no? Seemed much closer in the last video with both
Is the new mode an OS5 thing or will x100 ultra keep all the manual options even on OS5?
Wonder if x200 pro has any advantages other than battery and video once the zoom updates come to the ultra.
@@svenmuchow-tiktokads I feel like the same, on the main 1x, 2x part I said that Ultra looks more natural for my eye.
Here I just talked about obvious visible differences. Telephoto is almost the same, except new computation that makes image more artificial, that I try to turn off.
On previous video lots of comments was about how Pro beats Ultra in almost all aspects, so I wanted to point out and make it more clear.
Also by the way, selfie on Pro does not have autofocus. I usually make first impressions, and than try to make in depth photo/video battle. And after that I make long term final review
@@svenmuchow-tiktokads That 1 hour video is just first impressions after 1 day of use, I made it almost overnight. Next third video will be in-depth, it will be called "Star Phones Episode 3"
@@AlienTechnologies33 yoyo my guy! any estimate to when the Star Phones Ep. 3 is coming out? really looking forward to it
@patttt8679 have some earthling deals to finish. 3-4 days. But will try to do it faster
hi mate. i follow your reviews with pleasure. i use x100 ultra. i updated it to originOS 5 beta. after the updates, x100 ultra now takes artificial shots like x200 pro. while it used to make 10x digital shots like optical, now artificial sharpness and watercolour effect dominate in 10x shots. Did you have originOS 4 on the x100 ultra while you were doing these tests? or did you update the device? what are your impressions?
Hello my friend, Origin OS4. Thats why i am not so shure about updating to OS5. Try to remove sharpness slider all the way down. To tell the truth i enjoy dedicated Night Mode and Astro mode, i really wish they just made an Astro button, so phone knows that i want to shoot stars
@AlienTechnologies33 I hope they fix this problem. I sent dozens of emails to Vivo.
@yusufer41 can you please test 1x or 2x, doest it affect texture of the skin, natural look, I still do not have firmware available
@@AlienTechnologies33 There are no problems with skin tones. The real problem is the fake sharpness at 10x and 20x, unnatural images, and focusing problems in macro mode.
main camera on the x200 U will be the same as x200 Pro but bigger focal length and aperture correct ?
Then the other improvement that x200 U will offer is the ultra wide camera.
So if the main focus is photography would the main camera of X100 U with the 1 inch sensor still be better?
Or can bigger focal lengths and apertures compensate for the smaller sensor in the upcoming x200 U ?
@@jamesfitzes5771 Right now we have only the rumors. X100 Ultra was released not so long ago
@@jamesfitzes5771 sensor size is really impactful. I want to see better sensor technology, like "Back Side Illumination", "Stacking of layers", may be physical shutter. 0.2 aperture increase won't change anything
@@AlienTechnologies33 It would be nice if the X200 U keeps the same 1 inch sensor and further improves it... I highly doubt they will unfortunately and will go with the LYT 818
@@AlienTechnologies33 Yes, Vivo is going to use the Lyt 818, but with a 35mm optical focal length, which is technically much better than the Lyt 900 cropped to 35mm. It's like comparing 1/1.28 (Lyt 818) to 1/1.5 (Lyt 900).
The 23mm focal length is not practical for real-time usage; it's too wide for the main lens and too narrow for the ultra-wide lens. It’s essentially a compromised focal length designed for smartphones due to size constraints.
Additionally, they will be using two Lyt 818 sensors for the main and ultra-wide lenses, which could allow for some interesting fusion effects as well.
First! Really cool! But I already have the XU14 :)
@@skyunn Leica Authentic ❤️🔥
Hi, could you help me test the X200Pro's performance in night scenes at ISO 204800? I feel there is too much noise at that setting. When I used the X100Pro in astro mode for extreme night scenes, the noise was much cleaner compared to the X200Pro.
@@ImYellow95 Hey, Orange. 🍊 Yes, I have already made couple of tests, can confirm, extreme low light, dark room, handheld, x200 pro does this gazillion ISO, vs x100 Ultra 65.000, and in some small small parts, on Pro we have very very vague and almost unnoticeable more defined textures, but with dirty image everywhere, black textured noisy patches across all image
Excellent review as always..... you nail all the points that matter in real world scenario...
Thank you my friend ✨🌌🕯️
Thanks again for the comparison! If you do decide to update your x100ultra to Origin OS5, could you perhaps take a few 10x and 20x photos on Origin 4, and after the update to origin 5 the same 10x and 20x shots ? I am curious to see if the rumours of degraded camera performance of the x100ultra on origin OS5 are true
@@stickmennoeller some people say that it has more aggressive drawing. I can see that in x200 Pro, may be they tried to hide main sensor flaws by that, but on x200 pro 10x and above are more aggressive, even if you turn off new "telephoto enhancements", which I used to show the difference in next video, but do not recommend, image becomes more like second tele on Oppo
@AlienTechnologies33 thanks for the reply! Yes I am definitely not a fan of the super artificial drawing, that's why I hope that the x100 ultra doesn't have it on origin OS 5, like some people are saying
@@stickmennoeller Just thought I would chime in as well, I have an X100 Ultra, and I have OS5 Beta, igs has a couple of updates now. I would say the zoom images at 10x and above still look as they did.
First of all, thank you very much for these wonderful reviews. When I first saw your channel a few months ago, I was very happy saying "this is the channel I was looking for" and subscribed immediately.
I appreciate your efforts, reviews and comments and I watch you with pleasure.
Now I have a question for you, or rather I need your advice. I would be very happy if you could help. I am very interested in smartphones and technology, but despite this, I am not someone who changes phones very often. My current phone is a 7-year-old Android phone with a lot of problems. Therefore, it is high time to change my phone. I want to buy a very good phone since I plan to use it for a long time. The thing I expect the most from a smartphone is that its camera and performance are good. I like Vivo's camera performance or shots more than any other phone. It appeals to me more, especially street photography is my area of interest. I saw this in the x100 Ultra and was amazed, and now there is the x200 Pro model. I am torn between these two phones. I am also thinking about whether I should wait for the x200 Ultra. By the way, if I understood correctly, you said that the x200 Pro was behind the x100 Utra in street photography or that it did not have an HDR feature. However, when I watched other review videos, I saw some who said that there was not much difference between the shots of the two devices and showed their shots. This is exactly the issue that made me think with your comment and review and I became pessimistic. Do you have any advice for me on what I should do about this? Your comments are important to me.
Sorry, it was a bit long.
Thank you in advance. 🌌
Friend if you want to keep your new phone 5-7 years buy Samsung , or pixel phone ,only them have 5+ years of support for update , vivo and the others have 3 years tops I think
Thank you for watching my friend. I am in the process of making large photo comparsion. I did not watch any reviewers about x200bpro, but from what I can see even without zooming photos, that there is a difference, and when I zoom in to look closely in some areas I see huge difference. Even on video, I thought that noise problem won't be that big, but after couple of tests I can say, that I just cant use x200 pro for video the same way as I use x100 Ultra. Any way. I will make this new video and will return to your comment.
@@jojopolnareff370 Hello, nice to see you my friend 🕯️✨🌌
I can agree, but also want to mention, that I used my previous phones without updating them purposely, and had no problems. Also, if they promise 5+ years, does not mean that they will do it regularly, for example they can do it not very often, with small and not very useful updates. For example, in lots of areas Samsung and Pixel are already outdated to the point, that no firmware update can fix it even in 5 years. So it depends.
@@Ubrmnch After next "Star Phones Episode 3" I will make Final review video of each phone individually, will say what they have and what they lack. This is the last big video this year for smartphones, I want summ it up and switch to some other tech
@@AlienTechnologies33 🎉🎉🎉🎉👑👑👑👑 that's is true , with your video my hopes are down a lot with 200pro , I hope 200 ultra will follow the step of 100uktra in terms of photo/video software and feeling in the hand etc with the best sensors
Complimenti bellissimo video..Qui in Italia i recensori fanno recensioni " bonificate" a Samsung e Apple..Ho iniziato con Xiaomi 13 ultra,e 14 Ultra dove hanno file Raw eccezionali, ma nel punta e scatta " Jpeg " sbagliava" in modalita Leica Autentico su Xiaomi 14 ultra troppo contrasto,sbagliava spesso esposizione...Con questo Vivo X100 Ultra ho trovato versatilità e coerenza. CONSIDERAZIONI PERSONALI
@@eddybushido6687 Grazie per aver guardato amico. ecco perché, dopo tutti i telefoni, ho scelto Vivo. Un risultato versatile, prevedibile e di alta qualità.
giorni spaziali, per te amico ✨🛸🌌
D'accordissimo con te. Sul punta e scatta, Vivo non si batte. Penso che siamo tra i pochissimi italiani a possedere il Vivo X 100 Ultra, e onestamente gli altri non sanno che si perdono!
Assolutamente d'accordo da possessore di Vivo X100 Ultra non saprei con cosa cambiarlo è strepitoso su tutto, io faccio foto di natura, insetti e fiori ed è imbattibile! Grazie del video sei sempre speciale!
@marcellosalvarani3315 Grazie, amico. buona giornata. Cosmos luminoso, per te 🤳 ✨🌌
@marcellosalvarani3315 è un dispositivo che ha molte qualità importanti, tra cui la batteria /ore di schermo "in un giorno arrivo a sera al 30-35%,dopo aver fatto tante foto /video /visto RUclips, girando per la città" quindi tanti cambi cella"cioè ne provo/cambio tanti di Telefoni*mia malattia da Neuro 🤣
Let's hope they can release global ultra versions.
Whould be nice ✨
Ultra version of Vivo is intended for China only. Go and get the Oppo Find X8 pro its the new king of camera, it demolished the Vivo x200 pro, samsung s24 ultra, iphone 16 pro max and Oneplus 13 pro. Imagine if the Oppo find X8 Ultra will be release, it also comes with a 1 inch lens sensor and it is a global version.
@@gee620 I have lots of videos with Oppo. Hasselblad Magic, 1 true king, Game of Phones, Infinity Phones.
Love Oppo, portrait king 👑
@@gee620 but I have Zero problems with CN Vivo Ultra on Origin OS. For my use it is zero difference over something like samsung
@@gee620 oppo x8 pro does not destroy the x200 pro stop spreading trash dude.
The Comparison Master is Back 🔥
Some Vivo fanboys probably won't like this video... I like it because you speak and show people the truth. Congratulations!
Thank you my friend ✨ Phones are just a tools, and they'd better be a good ones, for the money they ask.
Want to see what will be in a 5 years from now 🛸
I'm sure you are not talking about Johnny Manuel, but about some other people)
Very good comparison. ❤️ I have a X200P and I agree on most things. I bought it for the telephoto, because that's what I use the most. The main sensor is "good enough" for my usage, but yes, it is a downgrade from the Ultra.
@@LordAngelus Thank you for watching my friend. x200 Pro is nice phone. And I agree, telephoto is the most interesting here, and on that front everything is more than good 🦾
If you shoot sRaw situation on main lens will be better.
Despite photography shenanigans, x200 Pro has lots of strong points, and I find results among other devices in the same category more than good enough ✨
Great video. My first impressions on the X200 Pro were the same. 1 inch sensor missing is a downgrade for the 2x zoom especially.
Thank you my friend. I am testing Raw right now, situation is slightly better, but still, 1 inch is stronger, when phone is stacking multiple photos together, this slightly becomes noticeable, and on purerly auto mode difference is huge. Ultra can easily replace apsc for me, but on Pro I am not so shure.
Oooh i was really shocked that the X200 Pro doesnt have the astro and supermoon mode!
Btw, currently the X100s Pro cost is now $675 usd, while the X200 Pro cost $900 in my place. Which is better between the two? Im kinda leaning towards the X100s Pro as it has its own astro+supermoon mode which I always use for star gazing photograhy, and its much more cheaper as well.
@@PhoenyxuzPrimax New landscape mode has it all built in, it gives potential for new angles and lenses, for example moon and stars with buildings or clouds in the background. But I really wish we still had this buttons, so phone 100% knows that we want to shoot stars or/and moon. More buttons and agency over device is far superior than relying on scene detections.
To tell the truth I have not tested 100s pro, but HP9 telephoto is very strong on x200 pro, but main sensor is noticeable downgrade in photography. I bought x200 pro for 900$ but it has maximum ram and storage, and it feels little bit too expensive for what it is, not everyone will agree, but I'd rather buy old Ultra or wait for new one, or saved money on x100s Pro (but again I have not tested it, take it with skepticism), because x200 Pro has downgrade on main sensor, 15mm ultrawide is tight for me, selfie camera has no autofocus, HP9 tele for macro has longer focus distance, speakers are noticeably worse at least 3 stars vs 4 stars out 5, and new wide screen design is not so comfortable for 1 hand use.
Hard to really give any recommendations, but here are my thoughts. I do not think that you will regret any phone, x100s pro, x200 pro, x100 ultra, you will get nice photo/video experience.
@@PhoenyxuzPrimax if you use sRaw photos on x200 pro on main sensor, gap will be slightly closer, texture on the skin will be better, but still compared to ultra it is a downgrade even in sRaw and Raw. May be they can fix it with firmware, but I press "X" to doubt.
@@PhoenyxuzPrimax but on video we see noticable boost, to tell the truth it feels like just a software gatekeeping, no way my old Mi9 did 4k 60 fps in log, but snapdragon 8 gen 3 can't.
But x200 pro has built in log on 60 fps with all lenses, and vivo log is kinda nice, but not the basic LUT, I used my custom made, may be will post it on "buy me a coffee" for free when I am not lazy and in a good mood
Thank you for your review Sir! I want to buy a camera phone and I still can pick one between the Xiaomi 14 ultra, the vivo x100 ultra and the x200 pro. I want to buy one for mobile photography and vlog. I want to create content online. Between these 3 flagships, which one will be the most efficient for a beginner?
@@julmistefilsnoel527 For video I suggest to look at the dji osmo pocket 3.
If you absolutely need a video on a phone, all of them can do a job, may be x200 Pro will be better for video, it has Log, it has better night video.
But for Photography I defenetly suggest Xiaomi 14 Ultra and Vivo x100 Ultra, x200 Pro in my opinion is not there, not bad, but not top performer, if you are alright with Raw editing, x200 Pro can be done, but again in my opinion is not on the same level as Xiaomi or Vivo Ultra.
I agree with you on pure photography. But if you want all android features and avoid many workarounds, the global x200 pro is the best option. I used an x fold 3 pro Chinese version for 5 months and i sold it because I got tired of having to tweak everything for it to work.
Yes my friend, agree. Thats why i said that for average smartphone user it will be better to buy Pro model, new features, better battery, for less money. Right now i am using Ultra, had to initially config, but i can use Galaxy Watch on wear os, i have calls and notifications no problem, NFC with cards, etc. Of course i wish it had all the features, like BlueLM Copilot, Jovi Assistant with different languages etc.
What is yours avg. Sot on x100u and x200 pro?
If you do not care about pixel peeps, x200 pro will be better, you can occasionally use HP9 telephoto for more natural portraits. Video will be better on Pro.
Speakers will be worse on Pro.
But I won't switch to Pro, will wait to Ultra or may be another brand that can beat it. Or triple foldable from Vivo with equal cameras.
@@AlienTechnologies33 but what is your screen on time on both phones?
@Lax241PL Need to do more real world tests on Pro. It depends on what I do, anything from 6 to 9 hours on Ultra. After day photo/video tests difference was 6% at roughly 80% battery
@@AlienTechnologies33 and probably 7-10h on Pro?
does the faster shutter speed in the x200 pro makes any significant difference in the quality of moving objects pictures?
@@patkluivert4110 we can see less or even no interpolation lines right now on Pro, which is good, but the same image quality degradation as on normal portraits with main sensor. In this video there is one example, running girl, face is more artificial, and texture on the hat has mushiness, stitches and fabric are very distorted.
Тесты проводились с актуальными обновлениями? 🙀
Да, всё самое новое. Около 4 гб за всё время. Но на Ultra Origin OS4
@@AlienTechnologies33на Ультре вышла Origin OS5 стабильная в пробной обнове.
What about X100 Pro? Is it the same story with the 1inch sensor in X100 Pro?
@@NS-cd7jn Do not know for sure, but it should be close. To tell the truth for portraits I love this new telephoto, it gives very cool faces and textures of skin. So I kinda still can recommend x200 pro in this regard. But Ultra is so good, may be you can find a good deal, right now it is possible to find Ultra for the price of x200 Pro.
@AlienTechnologies33 Not available in my region. But you mentioned soft skin textures and lack of details in people's faces because of the smaller sensor? Is that right?
x100 pro or x200 pro main Sensor better?
On Ultra is better, but it depends on how it is being used by a software. x100 Ultra will be better for skin, face, real textures, while x200 Pro can potentially give better videos. It all depends on app, software implementation.
Please compare sony xperia 1v vs xiaomi 14 ultra max and vivo x100 ultra bec im thinking of buying between one of these.
@@Abhinav.3290 I have a video vs Xperia 1 VI, its called "Infinity Phones"
Here is Link: ruclips.net/video/ItoDkhOIIy4/видео.html
When we see the work that you provide, the tests that you carry out with unparalleled attention to detail in the photographic approach, then yes I agree with you in your conclusion. The x200Pro is an excellent device in all respects but the x100U is much more subtle in its management of cameras and which is close to a DSLR rendering as the 14U does too. I'm waiting to see what the brands will offer us in 2025 with their Ultra and my choice will come. Greetings 👽
@@christianf9844 Hello my friend. Agree, X14U was great in lots of aspects, video as well 🦾✨
Awesome, looking forward to the complete video! I've seen people rave about the Oppo Find X8 Pro, which is making it even harder to pick a phone now, but mostly I think Vivo has me hooked.
@@frikkenI23 To tell the truth I do not think that difference will be that drastic. Until we get something completly new, like large sensor on ultra wide, big sensor on selfie that slides moves up and down from under the screen, or even larger sensor size on other lenses, or stacked bsi that can have continuous computation raw in a buffer. Until than I think results will be +- the same
@@AlienTechnologies33 yeah, I guess the X100 Ultra might be the best around until something like that comes along. I saw you showcase the X200's nighttime video and stuff, people seemed to like it and give the point to the 200, but to be honest I take dark footage of dark enviorments over blue brigtened footage any day of the week as long as photos still turn out good, so I really think there's nothing pointing me towards the X200 unless the Ultra gets a global release. That's an upside with the Oppo, it's global, but it doesn't have the color science as on-point as Vivo, and the stuff like tuning sharpening, which seems awesome to have on the Vivo.
@@frikkenI23 sometimes when I am bored, I play around with settings, tweak sharpness, brightness, contrast, saturation, now I like to play around with "textured" color profile. This feature along gives fresh feelings to stale smartphone market. That's why I like it. That I have different options. If I want to give a smile and interest on the face of friends and family, I turn on face retouching portraits, they every time ask to look, start to zoom and ask to send them photo. Love all this options. I think that first of all smartphone should give fun and emotions. I loved Oppo also, but always wish it gave me ability to play with settings. It is not only a "serious" tool, but also a toy to bring emotions.
@@AlienTechnologies33 I totally agree, a phone-camera needs to have some soul to it. It's a bit of a bummer that no one has made a comparison of the Oppo and the X100 Ultra yet though, people make ones with the X200 Pro, but Vivo's best, no-compromise camera seems to absolutely be the X100 Ultra, so I think they should compare with that as well. do you agree?
@@AlienTechnologies33 oh man, there's been a development! Someone in my area is selling a Find X7 Ultra with 100% battery health for 580 USD. for comparison, the Vivo with the same amount of storage would cost me 1050 USD, and the new Oppo Pro, which is really only tempting because it's global, is tipped to cost about 1100 USD. You're the expert, what do you think I should do?
I hope Vivo X200 Ultra will have the possibility to pilot remote flash (Godox)
Ask Vivo to be a beta tester
Need to buy that flash already 📸
the video I was waiting for
@@Gabyx Soon will be more. Raw photography can help little bit, doing all this tests while weather is good
X200 pro ночью намного интереснее будет, особенно в видео. За счёт более мощного процессора в связке с более качественной обработкой и более светосильной матрицей.
Единственный минус, очень заметный, x200 Pro не даёт такую настоящую фотографию в 1х и 2х, кожа и детали теряются и подрисовываются, делая лицо более пластиковым, теряется вся магия. Можно использовать Raw и sRaw, но Ultra всё равно будет лучше, с большим количеством деталей и в более трудных условиях съёмки
Thanks
📸
This what real review is , nice video 👌
☄️🪐🌌
X200 Pro has better HDR both in photos and in videos and I think it's an important point you haven't reported. Let me also add that X100 Ultra got more updates than X200 Pro, which will be released worldwide and will receive much more updates and tweaks in the future than X200 Ultra. Maybe you should make a new comparison in 6 months, when X200 Pro will be as mature as X100 Ultra.
@@maxel7723 I have reported in a previous video, but this hdr difference is minor and I will take old hdr performance over performance of faces on x200 Pro
@@maxel7723 if magic happens I will make a new video. But right now after more than 4 gigs of updates, the gap is too big for me. I do not think that something can be done here. I hope they do not include this sensor in x200 Ultra
will there be a vivo 200 ultra? 🤔
@@simmysharma6845 I think in the middle-end of the year
We want a detailed camera comparison between these two.....can you please?😅
@@vicky8657 already in the process 🦾
This is only the trailer for sure😂
I'm waiting to see if the x200 ultra is going to have a global release before I purchase
They should consider. 100 series was so strong 🛸
What's the point of keeping the dinner plate sized camera bump if the cameras are downgraded. The ultra version better have a 1" type of sensor, but I doubt it and it probably won't even go global.
@@wangflop To grab on it 👐🤳 I always grab it by fingers and slightly support with corner of palm 👾
Guess I'm gonna wait for the Xiaomi 15 Ultra to launch in India then, X200 pro seemed to good to be true without that 1 inch main sensor, I was willing to take the ultra wide and front camera downgrades too if the new smaller sensor indeed performed as well as the 1 inch one, but alas, and with rumours indicating that the X200 Ultra too will have the same primary as the X200 pro really does make Xiaomi suddenly pop to the top of my next smartphone contenders list.
May be magic happens with firmware updates, but I highly doubt it. X200 pro is very nice device, but defenetly, there is a threshold for image quality on sensor size I guess.
Yes, I also read the news that the sensor will be smaller in the x200 ultra, but there are also news that they will use 2 telephoto cameras, which means more detailed and crazy sharp photos when zoomed in.
@@yusufer41 hope they use better 1 inch, may be stacked and BSI, if there is any, instead of going lower size
Vivox100pro vs Vivo x200 pro which best
@@vaibhavisunildattmore hard question, depends on what you want to achieve and what price and deal you can get. I feel like x200 will be better overall
@AlienTechnologies33 Thank uhh so much sir 😍
Damn, I didn’t knew they got rid of all the dedicated astro, moon mode for automatic scene detection, such a big let down. That was the reason i hated pixels, iphones, shame vivo is just blindly following them.
I am making more tests right now, looks like this Landscape mode works, but i really wish it had dedicated button, so i know for sure that it doing what i want it to do. Also it has night/tripod button, it only appears on the screen if phone detects low light or no motion, yesterday i tried to shoot stars with small wind on a clumsy tripod and this tripod button was constantly appearing and disappearing, had to wait till wind stops or tried to click the button as soon as it appeared. It is still better than on most of the phones, but i wish everything was manual. Some people do not even know that Ultra has nigh video mode, because button appears only in low light when scene is detected.
@ oh i see, but what about light painting modes like traffic trails, star trails, are those still present?
@saurav4180 Yes, all the same, only "Supermoon" and "Astro default" now is built in to scene detection, potentially it can give new options and angles, but I still think that there should be buttons.
they downgraded the ultra after launch the pro?
@@FFJ04 No, looks the same.
Nice comparison
Thank you kindly 🕯️
hope origin OS5 will not change the Camara App on the x100ultra like it is on x200pro.Loosing manuel control😑 i will wait with updating till somebody has testet it
@@sebw3964 I will sacrifice my Ultra for greater good 🤖
@@AlienTechnologies33😅 No dont risk a Camera App downgrade.
No ,dont risk a downgrade 😅
@@AlienTechnologies33Seems like Origin OS5 did not downgraded anything in the Camera App👍🏼 The Zoom is smoother now.Allready got a second little Update on Origin OS5.
x100 ultra night mode photos are far inferior, the model they use to define the shapes and objects is outdated, yes on daylight is slighly better, but still I think nothing beats the x200 pro on night photography as for video, there is no shakiness like the x100 ultra, so x200 pro is more usable, unless you used third party applications but none of them have mic noise isolation
@@pontiacgtx4801 For photos actually I am making tests, and do not find right now night mode better on Pro, especially in extreme conditions.
As for video, I agree that Pro is better, software gatekeeping etc, but to tell the truth, for anything more than social media, messaging, I will use Pocket 1 or 3, and for tripod I like mirorless. But of course having good video is always better than having bad one.
@@pontiacgtx4801 As for the night portraits, x200 pro completly flops, you need to use raw to get something even remotely close to Ultra
@@pontiacgtx4801x200 Pro on 1x, 2x skin gets muddy and mushy, with plastic textures
But of course it is just edgy photographers thing, in a vacuum both this phones can be a great daily tools
Waiting to get the x200 pro ❤
@@bleakoned I am trying to convince my wife to take it over honor m6 👾
Hope so they don't take away 1 inch sensor from ultra 200x
From news leaks x200 ultra will get 1/1,3 inch 35mm main camera. But on the other hand there will be also 1/1,3 inch ulta wide.
@@SidheeqV-w4o may be we can collectively make a feedback. I see a trend with more processing over natural image. But 35 mm sounds fun. I heard that Nubia z70 will have 1 inch with 35mm also.
@@AlienTechnologies33 nubia z70 ultra has 1/1,56 sensor with 35mm 1,4f-4,0f apareture.
@@glutworkout9774 eehh, rumors were wrong. But imagine 1inch 35mm ❤️🔥
@@AlienTechnologies33 I would love to see that, but real focal lenght is over 13mm, so it won't happen soon. At the moment I'm pleased with x100 ultra camera performance.
Please compare with Huawei pura 70 ultra!
Whatever you say is final. X100 ultra still outshines x200 pro. Let's see what upgrades we get with X200 ultra.
If people do not care about zooming at the photo, may be it can be okay, x200 Pro can still use HP9 telephoto for more natural portraits. Video will be better.
But having this two phones side by side, my honest thoughts, that I will still keep using Ultra. Hope to see improvement in x200 Ultra 🛸 preferably triple foldable 🦾
it does not on video, if you realize there will be an annoying micro jump of the sensor when recording that is fixed on the x200 pro and wont be fixed on the x100 ultra
For anything more serious than WhatsApp message I won't use a phone, especially in low light for video
They could theoretically fix it, but the more you buy, the more you save, I guess waiting for x200 Ultra
The x200 ultra MUST have a big upgrade from these two otherwise the whole line up is a waste
@@Wizard-c3i Agree, want to see sensor size encrease. X100 Pro was a good jump vs x90 pro plus, and Ultra brought it to a new levels.
The 200 does not impress me I love my ultra and even want to get a second one
@@young2125 For photography ultra is so strong. On x200 pro I need to use raw to try and get something similar on main sensor.
I want Ultra cameras in triple foldable body 🛸
По-моему динамики звучат скорее как 3 и 3.5 из 5, а не 2 и 4
As for me, speakers sound more like 3 and 3.5 out of 5, not 2 and 4, not so big difference
difference is huge in person, even on this video when i listen in the headphones or on laptop it is so obvious, like defined strings and bells vs almost nothing
Ultra can fight on the lines vs all other flagships and is better than my iphone Pro version, while x200 Pro is too mushy, too unclean
Если слушать современные шедевры, возможно разница не будет велика
На 5 звучит Honor Magic 6 Ultimate, очень хороший звук, даже жаль его продавать из-за этого взамен на x200 Pro, но фотографирует он конечно не так как звучит...
the ultra looks better lol
I think x200 pro is just an upgrade of x100 pro but not x100 ultra
Hope they keep sensor size in the future 🔮
honor magic 7 pro pleaseeeee
are you so poor to buy lights for your video
So original
In its nonsense