The Strange Mystery of Quantum Time
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- An exploration of various ways of looking at time and how General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics views it differently and the ultimately question, what exactly is time?
My Patreon Page:
/ johnmichaelgodier
My Event Horizon Channel:
/ eventhorizonshow
Papers:
"Magnetic clock for a harmonic oscillator", Coppo et al, 2024
journals.aps.o...
Music:
Dark Fog by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommon...
Source: incompetech.com...
Intermission in D by Miguel Johnson
migueljohnson....
quantum time is defined as the amount of time between me seeing and me clicking a new Godier video
U mean Planck time? Xd
Shut up
@@Fermi_Consistencyhahah, dang. I knew someone smarter than me was going to beat me to it! 😂
@@Fermi_Consistency It takes me 5 pico-plancks to click on the video, I am weak but I am improving
Okay then what is an amount of time?
It's scary to think about the "end" of everything. From our current understanding, there will be a point where the entire universe is dark and full of black holes. Even those will eventually die out. I wonder what will happen after all that takes place. A new start? Eternal darkness?
We have barely scratched the surface of our understanding of the universe. I hope I am around for some big breakthroughs.
There is a very strong argument that "nothing" is still an array of quanta that can change - vacuum state fluctuations. On absolutely incomprehensible timescales that extend beyond every black hole evaporating, there will be some arrangement of states described by these quanta that, in a sense, form the spark to cohere into a universe.
The Boltzmann brain is hard to statistically disprove as well. This same state of fluctuations could, as arbitrarily as making a new universe, could make a full brain, complete with thoughts.
I am not an expert in this field, but I highly enjoy the concept that nothingness commands the existence of something by virtue of sheer 'patience' or rather chaos.
That the question that's been in my mind since I learned it
At that point there is no time as nothing will be there to mark its passing.
It's probably darkness for a googlplex and then...darkness for another after that. Perhaps as entropy increases our very ideas of what the universe is will change as well.
@BriarLeaf00 there will be no concept of time so it will be instantaneous
One of these videos, JMG is going to take a breath in the middle of the last word. XP
"... this amazing universe in which we liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii *breath* iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive."
All of time led to me clicking this video…
ALL of it!
13.8 billion years of cosmic expansion, of which 3.7 billion years of evolution of life, all led to this one moment. And history will forget it.
Kinda sad, isn't it?
@@EvenTheDogAgreesI too agree
Very weird and true😮
Oh, JMG. How I've longed for your soothing voice to educate me about this crazy universe in which we liiivvvveeeee ❤
We’re sleeping good with this one 🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🎙️
It’s about time someone did this!
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." -- Douglas Adams
Those spooky sounds in the background....
It couldn't possibly be any more entangled than the computer cords in my office.
I had to listen to this video three times and I still am not sure I fully understand it but I'm trying, which is sad because I have a strong science and math background. It sounds incredibly fascinating, this could unlock a lot of things that we have been struggling to understand. Though I suppose the "Why" will always elude us.
That was a fun one. Thanks!
This guy is amazing! Thanks for making these videos!
Now I can sleep ty jmg you are the man
If you can observe anything, time has not stopped for you.
In the first 11 minutes since posting this video it got 540 views and 98 likes.
Ok.👍
Are you John's accountant? 🤣
@iLikeMyOwnPosts 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Trippy video and deep audio topic.
Thank you John.
I love these videos so much and gives me a strange kind of hope when you explain about time dilation and i think of all the people saying "well yeah isnt that obvious?". I imagine the things we as a species will see as "obvious" in the future. ❤
thinking about how the universe could of been static until time was thrown around it like a rope is a wild and awesome thought. Im imagining a prehistoric earth with dinosaurs and water "frozen" until time hit it and pressed play. Sounds like how a child might think but when theres so many might of's, and could be's, and unknown variables its fun to think this way.
This is my third listen to this one and I'm still unwrapping political in my head. I love the awe inspiring, mind blowing content!
Another amazing video!
Thank you for sharing this video it was very interesting and fascinating. ❤
This is sorta off topic but it was brought up in the video and I wanted to convey my thoughts on the subject. Now I've played in my head over the years what quantum entanglement is and how it could be useful to us. Now I barely understand what it is so I think more on its practical use than it's overall mechanics of it.
I do 100% believe that information cannot be passed along two quantum particles and using it as a way of communication that way is impossible.
However in the Game Mass effect specifically in the sequel one of the game's antagonists, a corporation develops a quantum entanglement communication device. Back then it was already known this was impossible, but they put it in the game without much in the way of explanation.
That got me thinking, "what if we stumbled upon an advanced civilization that had such a technology, "how did they figure out a workaround?" plauged my thoughts.
Through that question alone I think I figured out a way, but let me preface here that I'm just a lowly dolt with an interest in the cosmos and I could be misconstruing my feeble understanding.
Again I do believe that communication between a pair of entangled particles is impossible. However there could be a workaround of sorts. Now my feeble understanding of quantum entanglement is that whenever you change the spin direct of one particle end the other particle follows suit.
This alone cannot convey information but say you made two boxes and made a billion quantum entangled particles and placed one set in one box and their entangled partners in the other box.
Then you set these particles up into rows and set a value that left spin equals "0" and right spin equals "1". Well, my friends is binary code and the very thing all computers (which is our primary device of communication) need to function properly.
All you'd have to do is change the spin of a few particles to get a binary sequence and a computer to interpret that on both sides of the paired boxes.
Now again I don't claim I have extra knowledge and I could be dead wrong about my assumptions and I'm probably not the first to think of this idea. But I've never seen such arguments and I wanted to share them regardless and to maybe spark debate on this topic since it was brought up by John.
John when will you post your intergalactic chili recipe?
I don't have an intergalactic one, or at least its not yet intergalactic, but I do have a solid chili recipe. Old one from Texas, pre-1930.
Thanks RUclips, I'd almost forgotten about this.
Also only 17k views in 2024? Feels like a classic, how have so few been scarred by this thing
This is wild.
cant keep entangled particles going long due to the universal tick rate.
get refreshed due to the diffuse and temporary nature of the fractal noise. 😄
wonder if we shot them one after the other and one past the other and had one affect the next before it flaked out and the force they were carrying was gravitational could we propel ourselves using gravity? like a ladder pulling on one rung after the next.
Force creates a mark in time, or in space or in a particle; the Event Horizon, the curvature of space due to gravity, and momentum of a mass in motion.
The causal sequence of the events, measured by the rapid clock, seems to flow slow and measured by the slow clock, seems to flow fast.
The speed of clock is done by the frequency of ticks:
m.c^2/htrans, [s^-1]
Related to the reference base (e.g. the reference elementary particle [electromagnetic] pulse).
See "World of the rings", at ResearchGate
For the gigantic mass of the black hole (the kind of an "elementary particle") is the speed of clock so rapid, that the "flow of time", measured by such a clock, seems to be close to "frozen" !
We don't know of any particles with backwards time arrows, AFAIK. If anti-matter and matter were both produced in the big bang, then perhaps we also got anti-time particles, in other words, particles with the opposite time arrow. Some went forward in time, the others went backwards in time. We don't see them because they don't exist yet and never will from a temporal perspective. This seems untestable, and thus unscientific, but still fun to think about.
Envisioned temporally, we've got 2 cones intersecting at their pointy ends, that intersection being the singularity of the big bang. But envisioned in terms of classical 3d space, the singularity more resembles the center of an expanding sphere. The anti-time particles would exist within the same 3d space, leaving open the possibility of strange interractions. Dark matter? Dark energy? Inflation?
I love your videos but I wish the music was a tad quieter, so I could focus more on your voice
Interesting video, thanks. 0:50 "The rate at which time ticks changes with acceleration"
I hope that you with that mean "physical time, as a rate of change in atoms in for example in an atom clock, only changes in accelerating PHASES of an object". Not that acceleration causes velocity through space, which as such causes change of physical time. Because here's the thing, matematically in the Lorentz/Einstein time dilation concerning motion:
It is a mathematical fact in the Lorentz factor, used in the Special Relativity (SR) time dilation equation, that the squared velocity variable there is equal to: 2 • acceleration • distance. Which is an equation originally derived by Torricelli (v squared = 2 • acceleration • distance, assuming initial velocity = 0), later incorporated among Newtons equations of motion.
What that means is that the SR time dilation equation is not valid (can not be used) for calculating time dilation for time intervals where acceleration does not take place. Which means that the so called Clock hypothesis is false, which assumes that acceleration as such has no effect on time dilation. Instead, it is ONLY accelerated motion (but not gravitational acceleration with free fall) which creates physical time dilation.
So:
- The Clock hypothesis can be debunked in this simple way above.
- Equations in Special relativity, containing the v^2 variable can not be used for inertial (non-accelerated) motions, they are only mathematically valid for accelerated motions. This seems to be a very common mistake by many physicists (on university level as well) in calculation examples.
- The twin "paradox" can then be fully explained/understood, intuitively, logically, mathematically and physically. Physical processes in atoms slow down when a rocket is accelerated. Only one twin is accelerated and it does not matter how far he/she travels back and forth with a non-accelerated coasting motion, the physical time dilation will be the same. The so called distance proof, that velocity as such, in inertial or non-inertial motion, is the source of time dilation is false. It is an invalid use (interpretation) of the time dilation equation, which then produces different time dilations for different travelled total distances for the travelling twin.
Just got a cooker of a migraine trying to understand this . Time to listen to KC and the Sunshine band .
My number one question still remains
1.) If you could enter a black hole and somehow escape; would you emerge in the distant past of your original timeframe?
Well if we ever discover negative mass and/or negative energy then it should be possible to go back in time, but that's just beyond anyone's comperhension.
Entanglement CAN be used for communications. It DOES require that the entanglement be established with the quantum entities to be entangled together INITIALLY but once that has been doen they can be separated by eons and still remain entangled.
No, it can't. You can only measure if it's up or down spin, and the other side will measure the same. But that's a coin toss, you have no control over the outcome. And once measured, that entangled particle has been exhausted and can no longer be used.
Love your videos sir ❤😎
Space/Time exists separately from the 3 quantum forces. This is the resolution that I'm sticking with. I would need some proof such as the discovery of a Graviton particle to believe otherwise.
Time is likely the expansion of the three dimensions of space. Gravity slowing the expansion would explain relativity and since space is expanding, that would explain the arrow of time.
So, my operating theory has been, for a bit more than a decade, now, that entanglement drives all macroscopic phenomena. The obvious and natural consequence of this is that systems will have a tendency to smear into coherent states unless maintained by an exchange of information - energy - that is the propagation of entangled states.
An example of this would be like the location of atoms in a planet observed around a distant star. It would be accurate to question whether or not the atoms exist in a meaningful manner or if those atoms exist within the system until some operation requiring one to have existed crops up.
The interesting consequence of this is that the universe exists along a gradient, perhaps quantized in ways that are not necessarily correlated to distance, of properties in a state of temporary decoherence into a defined state we are familiar with. To put it in exaggerated terms, things aren't there until we look at them.
This creates a bit of a problem in determining what initiated the entangled states or what the coherent states consist of.
It does, however, allow for fun interpretations of history. For example, we would expect to see quantum computation across systems capable of doing so - the nearly ideal and incomprehensibly efficient evolution of DNA, for example, can occur in a coherent state. Our ancient ancestors can be seen as either not existing or as having existed as a sort of superposition if possible states across which all factors could be operated on to produce, in as few cycles as necessary, the current result.
.... Though why the current result is what it is or how that would apply to a sufficiently isolated system to be rejoined with our own at a later time is something for a Twilight Zone episode.
we experience our lives one planck moment at a time - like a movie with an insane high fps...
find out what happens between each sliver of experience...that might be the path to time travel...
Time is as much a dimension as fruit loops are a dimension. There is a measurable maximum data rate on mutating quantum fields that instantaneously collapse into discreteness and then become a quantum field again until observed again.
Could light travelling along gravitational waves throw out the redshift values of distant galaxies? Could you ask Isaac Arthur about this?
When it’s said that a second entangled particle instantaneously reacts when the first is changed, what is meant by “instantaneously”? Time cannot be synchronised over galactic distances, surely?
In the interst of the basic energy that we are a collective of that can not be created or destroyed time does not matter.
Time...does it have a "speed" limit? If we speed up tonlight speed, would light look like a particle? It appears to slow down from the outside observer....just thinking outloud
I love you John
Whether thinking of it as 'something' (IE quantifiable/verifiable phenomenon/affect), or illusion (a la observation input bias), it appears most scientists pidgeonhole their thoughts about the fundamentals of time: that it is 1) uniform in rate, 2) that IF it has a force-mediator, that it would be singular, not composite. (IE 1 croniton, not a family of them).
IF Time is dimensional (IE part of N-space, where 3Spatial+1Time), regardless of whether spacetime is as GR/Einstein n co. envisioned it; or whether it is a separate set of fields, but we don't naturally discern individual time properties (in the same way M-theory would say we aren't able to naturally sense a 4th spatial dimension, because we evolved in a way that it was irrelevant to survival maybe), one would argue that it should be a Scalar.
Entropy is poorly explained currently, because it is clear things like Thermodynamic Equillibrium are not wholly responsible for what we observe on cosmic scale:
If it were merely that (where BB Singularity was discrete, whether finite or infinite in size, 2 possible outcomes in a 1-universe scenario would have occurred:
1) IF there were 'something' outside the BB singularity right at beginning (just before the event), or before it: then ONLY ONE thing could be certain, that this medium outside the singularity was close to, but not the same temperature and mass/density as the BB Singularity.
Should the external medium have been higher temp or mass/density, (assuming 4 current forces still existed), the BB event should have never occurred, or at least never expanded at rate it did (IE Inflationary Theory/Reionization). An exponentially higher difference would have prevent the BB singularity from 'expanding', and should have collapsed it further until some exotic degenerate matter existed or something akin to a SMBH formed (albeit universe-massive)
Should the external medium have been a significantly lower temp or mass/density, then the BB Singularity should have cooled in a manner (probably similar to current post-stellar remnants, where they are very hot/energetic, but will cool (a la white dwarf --> black dwarf). Exponentially lower and Inflation/Reionization should never have happened; it should have had a much greater entropic affect and supercooled everyting, skipping the current 'stellariferous' era, No significant stellar objects (mediated by fusion/degeneracy pressure vs gravity)...It should have skipped straight into a Degeneracy Era (with at best gravitational singularities like SMHs)
Observing that neither is the case:
-- The BB Singularity may not have been discrete (and there isn't anything 'beyond' it, that this universe meaningfully interacts with on cosmic scales)
OR
- Our theories about Thermodynamics are flawed, and entropic phenomenon are naturally reversible
OR
- The known universe is composite (whether result of 'collisions' between >=2 universes, or confirmation of White Holes 'exploding' from a different universe into this one)...And the explanation isn't based in a singular set of forces/fields, but instead several discrete sets of them (that may or not interact on any level).
I thought quantum entanglement was a correlation - the two are linked but do not have a relation.
Later, when the state is measured, you now know the state of both.
But there was no causal relation between the two.
Measuring one didn’t affect the other.
I do wonder if there is an underlying ‘framerate’ to the universe where a single quantised state of energy ( like a string or an even smaller theoretical object) can be in a certain position in space, and it serves as information for that place in space. If the energy levels are quantised and have whole integer values then you could argue that everything that will ever happen is already decided, because it there is a integer clock that ticks at discrete values then every single calculation that will be made, will be made and there is suddenly no probability, only certainty. If you know all the positions of all the quantised energy values in the entire universe at one point of time, then you can calculate the past and the future exactly. The path of the stars, the formation and death of galaxies, the neurons firing in the brains of every human, every decision we think is a conscious thought is really the quantum inevitably and free will is simply an illusion of false consciousness.
Would a warp drive act as a time machine? I understood that the 'warp' part gave a loophole to relativity?
nice one
This entire subject is wholly bizarre no matter what type of fence you are sitting on. Below I outlined GR events and Warp Drive. Up here I'll quack about the QM issues. So on the Entanglement side of Data Transfer being supposedly improbable, on that I have to say that is purely a condition of current technology at our disposal. The moment that we can entangle like actual ,molecules rather than just photons or bosons or leptons is the moment that we can start solving that problem of data transfer. Currently the most impressive experiment was bouncing entangled particles off of a receiver on the Moon. We can read and target the Entangled particles, but that is all outer observation rather than reading data directly from the Entangled particles themselves.
Pardon if my language is clumsy while talking QM, but it is not my strongest field of discussion. The one incredible thing to note though was I personally did want an experiment involving Entangle and using the Moon, and you have no idea how elated I was when they made that announcement. My prediction was whether there was going to be a Time Delay between two Entangled particles because the Moon sits just a tiny bit over 1 light second in distance away. So if you were going to catch a time delay on Entagled particles then the Mood had a good distance environment to test for the delay of speed between the 2 particles based on speed of causation. I was absolutely stunned that there was no time delay at the 1.3 Light Second distance to the Moon.
Now in my opinion that doesn't mean we won't find a time delay down the road though. Like the next distance that needs testing is around the 1 Light Hour distance, and then just keep pushing it further until we find an actual delay. And the reason why I feel this is important is because Entanglement suffers the same logic as the Single-Electron Universe hypothesis that was originally demolished by John Wheeler. So why would Entanglement survive scrutiny but the single Electron version of that premise got obliterated? The answer is Either something I haven't found yet in reading , or that this premise hasn't be completely satisfied yet. And in the same breath, does an Entangled Electron become less useful when applied directly to an electrical circuit? Unfortunately I think those questions are just slightly ahead of their time, but frankly I thought Entangled Moon distance particle wasn't going to happen as fast as it actually did either.
Wow what? I actually have to contradict something on here for once?
On the Warp Drive and Time Dilation, the speed of moving faster with the Warp Drive, type 4 Alcubierre style, will not result in backwards time travel at all because the ship itself is not moving at a relativist speed inside of the warp bubble. The warp bubble itself is is moving faster than light, and theoretically that is not the same thing as the speed of causation or speed of light at all. The current predictions about space expansion via dark energy is already saying that the expansion itself not only moves faster than light, but it has doing that for billions of years. The current estimated speed of Expansion is somewhere between 4x and 6x the speed of light. So the speed of time inside of the warp bubble is completely related only to the mass of the ship and everything in it provided that warp bubble can be designed as closely to the current models of it.
We already know for fact that location and relativity are linked directly with each other using planes with atomic clocks and even the one last cool experiment using only a tall building. Our position on Earth for time progression is more tied to where in specific 3D space we are located on Earth rather than the sole factor being the ambiguous that we are on earth. Both are correct in general sense, but we can directly affect our personal time progression by simply driving and flying very fast on earth, and that progression can measured accurate with the tools necessary to take the measurement.
So in the sense of the Warp Bubble, the ship in the center of the bubble will have time progression different than the actual bubble itself, and that very premise is the same premise that already works on the GPS satellites.
Isn't arrow of time consequence of 2nd law of thermodynamics?
What if there was a super slow particle that was emitted when some other particle is emitted that is entangled with that particle. (Maybe not particle, idk. Armchair scientist) So say a photon is emitted with this entangled (slow)photon. Maybe it's slow enough that it stays in the local area, possibly increasing the "mass" of the emitting system(dark matter, maybe it's moving too slow to detect somehow? idk). As those particles increased in distance apart, they would keep that "time" between them. But I've heard that from the photons point of view, it's both emitted and absorbed at the same time. There might be some quantum effect that allows "information" to be relayed back to the emitting system that violates our understanding of time. idk, I'm drunk. I hope it at least makes some sense.
Why can't it be the other way around: things are moving, atoms are decaying therefore we say there is time?
In the same way we don't claim temperature is fundamental and makes things hitting each other.
Faster than light travel is theoretically possible via the warping of spacetime, thus time travel into the past is possible.
I like the voice, great resonance. It is a great Bot or .... a real human......hummmm.
If you fall into a black hole at higher speed than light, you're not there yet
Veritasium has a recent video about what it would be like if you were to fall close to a black hole singularity.
It is interesting to think what happens in a singularity of infinite density. Einsteins theory falls apart. Not that it's wrong, but just incomplete 😅
If gravity warps space and time, what would time be like in something that dense?
It’s so intricate and connected. There must be a God.
More physics heavy videos?
If einstein lived now... He would use Linux.
9:35 But...Can more than one thing exist without entanglement?
It seems to me that time seems to point in a single direction because our perceptions are recorded in thar direction. 20 minutes ago I wasn't even thinking about time. Now I am... If that makes any sense.
Interstellar had so much potential as a movie but they could not help themselves and messed it up.
It is always now….always.
The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion.
Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton.
Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles.
*RUclips presentation of above arguments: ruclips.net/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/видео.html
*More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145
*Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1
Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997
Time slowing as you approach the speed of light is an observer bias theory. If you are in a ship moving at the speed of light, looking through a window at something moving at subsonic speed. From your perspective, everything out has stopped because you can observe the changes. Will inside the ship, everything will be normal. The reason being, your ability to make observations is limited by the speed of light.
To prove the theory correct, we would need to make a craft capable of relativistic travel from and back to earth. Most likely carrying a radioactive isotope. When it returns, you compare expected decay to actual decay. Theory proven or shot dead.
Entangled to what? Big world to the quantum world? Or something unknown like a mirror universe , and maybe this could be the dark matter…
The fact is 100 years later we still don't understand Einstein's theories and how space-time works. Nobody has taken his theories and expanded on them or completed them. A lot of people just ignore space-time and create new theories or do trial and error. We haven't gotten anywhere because people don't even understand 100 year old theories and how to apply them. Quite frankly, humanity is evolving in the wrong direction.
Who said no one has taken Einstein's theories and expanded on them? There are at the very least 100 solutions to Einstein's field equations that came out after his theory was published. There are also now a ton of proofs of General Relativity.
Deep
once upon a time black hole were considered to be completely invisible
Man, thank you! These videos make my day/night. Usually takes me a few nights to rewatch & get it all but almost every video are things that run through my head in those few peaceful moments when I occasionally get to daydream!
I pooped hard
That's great, except that it's basically all pointless.
In which we liiiiiive
You gotta get this in as a first comment to get it to the top of the list, if there's already 9-10 comments ahead of you it's too hard to build the momentum. I know, cause I've got the top comment with this on a few. I am telling you this cause I hope you get one to the top, too. I used to use that same profile pic, so... obviously you and I are not that different lol. Good luck and see you at the top!
In which we diiiiiiiiiiiiiiie.
Liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive!
i still dont get the joke or why he says it like that. Love the show, jmg, event horizon etc just dont get this one. Maybe its kinda like Anton petrovs "hi wonderful person"
I always enjoy a regular in depth exploration into the interesting and unknown aspects of this amazing universe in which we liiiiiive.
There's a kid somewhere watching this video right now.....and a spark is forming in the back of their mind.....many years from now while giving their Nobel Prize speech.....they mention inspiration from JMG videos.
I’d like to thank JMG videos for inspiring me to win the Nobel Prize.
- Jonathan Alpart, Nobel Prize winner
Actually knowledge has limits and we've reached it
@@deathbydeviceableyes, we know eveything about Earth, we already got mapped all the oceans floors to the milimeter
We know everything about all the planets, asteroids, and we are totally sure even black holes spins in just one axis
And we are sure dark matter is real, and dar energy too, we know everything
Like the cure for cancer, or aids, or hunger, or aging
You are right, after thinking some seconds about it, you are so damn right. We solved everything and we know everything!
@@deathbydeviceable said by people in the 1500's 1600's 1700's 1800's 1900's and now the 2000's
We will be extinct in 20 years
Just in time for bed in Scotland 🏴 love you JMG!!
Same here brother glasgow ❤🙏
Quantum Time? Don't know about quantum, but I always got time for your vids
Time is an illusion?
"Lunch time, doubly so." -Ford Prefect
I always run at full speed so I appear slower to all of you
Just in time for sleep. Thanks for all that you do, massively appreciated ❤
Spooky action at a distance still remains my biggest “um what”
It can be explained using the Holographic Principle. Every particle in our observable universe is thought to be smeared, or more aptly, holographically encoded across the entire cosmic event horizon. So the cosmic event horizon is about 15BLY away and everything we see in feee space is actually encoded onto that surface. So imagine you have two electrons in an otherwise empty universe, both electrons would be smeared across that entire event horizon some 15BLY away in every direction.
So, here is how it works. When you entangle a particle pair you turn one particle into two particles and because of conservation of angular momentum means that answers, on spin mean they will have opposite directions. But at first spin is in a superposition. Now when you prepare an entangled pair you haven’t constrained the spin degree of freedom yet. All you have done is constrain that whatever answer you get from measuring spin, the other observer will see the opposite. So basically a degree of freedom has been constrained when creating a particle pair, that you don’t know each spin yet, but they must be opposite. Now when you measure the spin of one particle and say you found it was soon Up, then you know automatically the other particle must be soon down when you collapse its wave function.
Since every particle is smeared across the same distant cosmic event horizon, that means even distant locales are on the holographic so rage , literally right next to each other.
So, when the particle’s spin is measured, an ER=EPR wormhole opens up and transmits that qubit through the wormhole so that distant pro writes become local. Since every particle is smeared across the same horizon that means when a wormhole opens up to share the information, even particles 13 billion light years distant are literally next to each other in the holographic horizon. This is why entangled information translates at the same speed no matter if your particle pair is a nanometer apart or 12BLY apart, the actual distance between every particle is virtually zero on a holographic horizon. This last part is somewhat speculative, and assumes ER=EPR is true which the table top wormhole experiment by Maria Spiropula seems to indicate ER=EPR, that entanglement equals wormholes. John Preskill and Lenny Susskind seems to think that experiment might have shown ER=EPR. Check out Quanta Magazine’s video on the table top wormhole.
@@thompaine5942UM WHAT? You could have just said an example is quantum entanglement.
I bought a happy meal for myself and one for my friend. He ordered a hot dog and I ordered a hamburger. I dropped off his meal to him and went back to my work office to eat mine. When I opened my happy meal it contained a hot dog. I immediately knew his happy meal contained a hamburger, since the receipt showed I bought one of each kind. Yet by then we were nearly 3 miles apart. I suppose all happy meals are quantum entangled.
Find videos about hidden variables, the EPR paper and Bell’s inequality theorem
You can get hot dogs in a happy meal where you are?! Jealous
Entropy- it’s not what it used to be.
Schroedingers happy meal.
Until you opened it, it was both a hotdog and a hamburger!
.... Hotdog in a happy meal?
I am so happy for a new JMG video ❤
So the big unfolding isn't a question of "how can something come from nothing?", but "how can the dynamic come from the static?"...
Or nothing is truly static, “static” is just some concept that emerges from our brains in the classical world - but the quantum world that under pins classical physics, dynamic processes are all that is and ever really was.
Im not sure if it was Mckenna or Watts but i love the quote "how could something come from nothing? Well where else would you expect something to happen?" Not exactly scientific but i love it all the same
@@jamesculverhouse4657 I came back from the nothingness. I don't know how it's possible, but it is. So i agree with this statement. ^^
In a black hole, static lasts billions of years ( according to Hawking)
gravity eventually wears down the state of singularity. When time and the fx of gravity go pass a certain point, equilibrium kicks in and the black hole erupts a new universe...
I think that is how it is... please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks in advance.
The Special Will - acts and brooks no contradiction.
When - the Divine works - it is automatic.
We share - in this Work and learn - to love - for - Love is the Base. (Hint from Raja yoga meditation)
Fare thee well - in life's journey.
What an unexpected treat! So nice to see the JMG gang out in force as well. Amid all life's craziness this habitat we've made for ourselves is the ultimate chillaxment. ❤
I guess it's a lot to ask from an 11 minute video, but I still haven't the slightest clue how entanglement could cause time to emerge.
Our known universe truly does feel like a giant prison simulation, where everything is coded in a way to prevent the "inmates" from finding an escape route.
That’s what religion says .. quantum physics and religion have odd similarities
Cause it's meant for one to see but all to feel 😂
The Demiurge
Death is the only way out.
I wonder how true that quote is, it came from mortal kombat 2, awful but fun film.
To be fair, there is a way out. But it's a bit of a leap of faith...
Hi
Lo
Sup.
Awesome stuff boss
Will neutrons decay?
Yes. In about 10 minutes.
Yes
Free neutrons do decay. Ones with protons seem stable.
Schrodinger neutrons as today
Nobody will ever know. They say you can’t destroy matter, so whatever is the lowest form will probably be forever.
This reminds me of something my forecasting professor said to me in college. Now granted, we are basically trying to predict things with mathematical graphs. He said something about the three dimensions, and I piped up, “don’t you mean four, time?” He said he thought time was a fractal at best. So then I got to thinking. A bunch of amoebas in a liquid no taller than them would only perceive two dimensions. Tilt the table, and the liquid starts flowing. The wood grain on the table may look and feel similar to the amoeba, but it would be unique. A person flips the table and these creatures suddenly get a crash course on a new dimension. Are we just on the table when it comes to time? I don’t have an answer, just tried to imagine how I could try to invalidate Joey’s argument.
Time can be thought of as a dimension but not an axis in space. Space has 3 axes with 6 degrees of freedom, X,Y,Z shift and rotate. There isn’t a time rotation. There is time shift but only in one direction and it’s not a spatial direction. I think time is different than space although they are connected. I think why we only see 3 dimensions is because we exist on a 2-D holographic surface at the cosmic event horizon. Two holographic dimensions can be encoded into appearing to have 3 dimensions in holographically encoded environment.
Hope you've been well Mr. JMG! Great video as always big thanks!
I can't help but think of time is an emergent property of energy which in all its forms is motion
God, 'quantum' is such a great word! Take the Bond movie title, 'Quantum of Solace'. That literally means, "The smallest amount of human comfort." What a great word!
Cool, I was surprised by the size-invariant result!
It makes total sense that if entanglement is instantaneous that understanding time relies on understanding entanglement and vice-versa.
At 4:05, a syntactical quirk in the matrix allows for two meanings, with only one intended. "One of four dimensions" wasn't supposed to mean "only one of four" possible dimensions, right? Rather we have "one universe possessed of four" distinct dimensions.
BTW--I'm grateful for this time together . . . it's a great channel with which to be entangled.
Time moves forward because it's the game moving forward in this SIMULATION which our world really is.
It's actually external energy willing out from the multiverse from every point in our three-dimensional space. Which is actually just one dimensional space folded on itself in every possible direction. Time is simply the result of The velocity of quantum effects and/or quantum uncertainty. And as multiverse heat energy. Interacts at that scale. It creates an energy gradient between itself and the rest of the environment. Causing quantum oscillations. The speed at which those quantum oscillations occur. Is the speed of light. Creating the effect of time. And the speed limit of the universe. Imagine a TV with a display frequency of 186,282 miles per second. You can try and make your TV go faster. But it just doesn't work in this universe. The quantum fluctuation cannot support a velocity faster than it is already going. Because it is the smallest unit of energy. It cannot lose or gain anymore energy. And their accumulation is dark energy.
You’re brilliant but you terrify me. lol. I also hate that you don’t believe in aliens, believe we went to the moon during Apollo 11, don’t believe in Dyson spheres, and don’t believe in UFO’s UAP’s or aliens. I hate it because you’re exponentially smarter than me and you don’t believe those things which means they aren’t real 😞