PGW Calibration to Labour Market Needs What is the purpose? To align PGWP eligibility with labour market needs while reducing the overall volume of PGWP holders, and increasing the likelihood that international students have labour market outcomes commensurate with their education and training. What is the NOC-CIP Mapping? ESDC and IRCC mapped NOC occupational codes to programs of study using the Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) system. This shows the programs of study that correspond to the educational requirements of occupations in long-term shortage (i.e. projections cover the 2022-2031 period) and occupations included in Express Entry's category-based selection. For example, the 'carpenter' NOC is mapped to any of the following three programs of study: construction trades, carpentry, woodworking/general. Key Questions 1. If PGW eligibility were restricted based solely on occupations in shortage, and corresponding programs of study, which occupations should be included based on the needs in your area? Please indicate if there are any occupations in shortage that should have been reflected in the mapping document along with your rationale. 2. What, if any, cohorts should be exempted from these changes, such as francophone students or graduate degree programs or others? Please indicate the rationale. 3. Should international students be required to demonstrate proof of a job offer aligned with the occupational shortage list in order to hold a PGWP beyond one year? 4. Should any other eligibility criteria (language, provincial support, etc.), apart from a job offer, be applied to PGWP holders seeking to extend their permit past one year. 5. What is your view of applying these labour market-based changes to PGWP eligibility to all graduates upon announcement this year, rather than grandfathering students who are already studying in Canada at the time of implementation? 6. How often should the occupational shortage list be revised, and at what point thereafter should it be applied to students whose study is underway? 7. Do changes to the PGWP being explored align with the profile of candidates you'd like to remain working in your jurisdictions in the long term? 8. Is your PNP positioned to offer a viable pathway to permanent residence for international graduates with job offers in these key sectors? Are there any gaps between the labour market needs you have identified and your PNP's existing streams? Will any PNP stream amendments be required to ensure they remain responsive to graduates and PGWP holders in specific occupations (e.g. regulated occupations)?
PGW Calibration to Labour Market Needs
What is the purpose?
To align PGWP eligibility with labour market needs while reducing the overall volume of PGWP holders, and increasing the likelihood that international students have labour market outcomes commensurate with their education and training.
What is the NOC-CIP Mapping?
ESDC and IRCC mapped NOC occupational codes to programs of study using the Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) system. This shows the programs of study that correspond to the educational requirements of occupations in long-term shortage (i.e. projections cover the 2022-2031 period) and occupations included in Express Entry's category-based selection. For example, the 'carpenter' NOC is mapped to any of the following three programs of study: construction trades, carpentry, woodworking/general.
Key Questions
1. If PGW eligibility were restricted based solely on occupations in shortage, and corresponding programs of study, which occupations should be included based on the needs in your area? Please indicate if there are any occupations in shortage that should have been reflected in the mapping document along with your rationale.
2. What, if any, cohorts should be exempted from these changes, such as francophone students or graduate degree programs or others? Please indicate the rationale.
3. Should international students be required to demonstrate proof of a job offer aligned with the occupational shortage list in order to hold a PGWP beyond one year?
4. Should any other eligibility criteria (language, provincial support, etc.), apart from a job offer, be applied to PGWP holders seeking to extend their permit past one year.
5. What is your view of applying these labour market-based changes to PGWP eligibility to all graduates upon announcement this year, rather than grandfathering students who are already studying in Canada at the time of implementation?
6. How often should the occupational shortage list be revised, and at what point thereafter should it be applied to students whose study is underway?
7. Do changes to the PGWP being explored align with the profile of candidates you'd like to remain working in your jurisdictions in the long term?
8. Is your PNP positioned to offer a viable pathway to permanent residence for international graduates with job offers in these key sectors? Are there any gaps between the labour market needs you have identified and your PNP's existing streams?
Will any PNP stream amendments be required to ensure they remain responsive to graduates and PGWP holders in specific occupations (e.g. regulated occupations)?
好节目
很多人听中介的话，读紧缺职业清单上的本科专业，比如IT，5-6万一年学费，的确毕业后就蒙蔽了，找不到工作，中介开出的找工作价格惊人。相反3万纽币一年的最让人看不起的商科管理硕士万金油专业的操作空间可大多了。我目前观察南亚同事大多是读私立便宜商科毕业，在大公司的超市仓库这种低端岗位工作N年后，基本公司都帮他们办了身份。而且，反过来也奇葩，他们居然能在公司干那么多年，不知道人事部门是不是有套算法能看出什么样的人会长期在这里工作。
不需要算法，印度人背着债务出来的，没有中国人那种房产财富可以转移过来。他们不会随便跳槽的，因为没有足够的积蓄
移民意向是可以变的啊，两年之内可以发生很多事，何况是一个人的定居意向？申请入学的时候没有想法，不代表以后吧？
学美国直接改成抽签就好。🤭机会人人有就看你的运气了😏
再说了留学时 就说了不能有移民倾向
所以现在在闹腾的留学生只能说明他们当时在申请留学签证的时候就在骗人隐藏了自己的移民倾向。
过去一年批的学签，没有这个要求
我今年二月份拒签就是移民倾向理由。
于理应该要祖父条款，于情，希望越多人离开越好，加拿大承担不起越来越多的人，住房医疗物价都崩溃了。
不是加拿大的公民和永久居民的人没有发言权也没有决策权。这是政策而不是签署的条约，自然可以说改就改。
属于历史文件
疫情之后百废待兴。一个留学生出很多钱的。还不是政府为了钱放进来的。后面经济压力太大。又是留学生的锅。加拿大就是庞氏骗局。阳谋。第三世界的人不得不钻
移民逐渐变成富裕人士的专有活动了
工签给多久都没撒，专业也随意，就是毕业只能在某些专业工作，工作十年给pr就可以了
对，不管你找什么工作只要有雇主愿意顾你，你能缴满10年税就给你PR。
这就看出来咱们某些华人的嘴脸了，上车之后把门焊死。自己拿PR希望越快越好，拿到后希望别人10年煎熬之后再拿PR
@@alexwoo6480 你要怪就怪加拿大的政客，本来一点点加移民挺好非要民怨沸腾。再怪就某国zf，造就了这么多想出来的人！
@@alexwoo6480 就算要焊也是加拿大的政府焊管我们屁事。在获得PR后的华人的利益是在加拿大这一边的凭啥要管那些想移民的人？为什么要去管一帮外国人？
@@jackstom7184 搞不懂为什么要怪印度政府？ 愿闻其详
就加拿大目前的通胀、物价、房价，确实也需要对移民政策，尤其对读书移民这条路径的政策导向进行调整了。
沒事, 咱繼續每個月收一萬難民爸爸