Some time ago, a bloke suggested a less “pretty” turbines of this type of generator installed along the side of main roads. The wind created by passing vehicles drive the turbines.
Great to see your acknowledgment of just a few of the problems of the monstrous mobiles. Hope these ideas work but I foresee possible shake rattle and hum harmonics issues
@@ev1558 I actually came up with a design myself a few days ago. Which will allow you to scale either only horizontally or vertically. In small increments. Of course you can scale either way in either configuration. But incremental scaling won't be very appealing in an uncooperative one. Hopefully I can learn cad to design it. By the way. I wasn't very clear in my last comment. Turbines' power output has a very significant change with increase in size. Going from a 2 metre radius turbine to a 4m.. wouldn't double the power output. Rather it may increase power output by much much more than just double. Altitude kinda works the same. Equation for measuring power output changes for each are different.
when combined with underground green hydrogen generators they can produce green hydrogen at filling stations. this would eliminate transport of green hydrogen fuel from plant manufacturers to filling stations. more green hydrogen installations at filling stations reduces cost of green hydrogen at filling stations. everyone wins except the oil industry and that's a great and progressive thing.
The average house needs about 2kW generated continuously to be self sufficient. This energy stored in batteries helps you over the peaks. Add a few more batteries for when the wind stops and you are golden. Having quite wind turbines is key .
These small turbines can only produce small power ,very small power. This is a law of physics based on the size of the surface area of the blade that can capture the available wind. Just like you can put a small sail on a sail boat small wind is not economical as there is no economy of scale by adding more of them. Also vertical access looks good but can not compare to large turbines. Another thing that is uncommon sense is the power of the wind needs to be at the site you install it. The prevailing wind is at heights of 100 feet, not on the ground.
The prevailing wind is a reference to wind direction. Whilst wind is stronger the higher you go there is always wind even at ground level , it’s just not as strong.
@@skidaddledude1997 yes and that is why a turbine installed at a low elevation with a small blade surface area is not cost effective. This is lawn art.
@@GWAYGWAY1 I'm joining the question. Furthermore - don't forget it takes much less space than traditional turbine, so more can be constructed in one place, plus it's much which is also an important factor.
Toys with very little potential. Will make money for those who promote them and sell them but no money for the suckers who buy them. How many to replace a 12MW horizontal axis turbine? 50,000? 250,000 ? Sorry but they are rubbish.
Up to now I saw these kind who where tri-phase 220V or 24-48-96V how to connect to the public network ? ( I have already 4 solarpanels with 2 invertors to 220V )
dont expect too much..lol...it need super military grade quality turbines which huge cost make their products unmarketable. I would say, their quality still stand at "toy grade" i.e. to charge e-bike, your gadgets and small electric tools.
This style has been tried and tested for over 2 decades. They simply aren't efficient enough. They would need to be nearly weightless and high up to even pay for themselves in 10 years.
Wouldn’t the airfoil design be yet more efficient if they were directional; turning into the wind no matter what direction it was coming from? In that fixed position, it looks (to my untrained eye) as if it’s going to miss out on potential energy if it’s coming from behind or to the side!
Yes it suffers from no directional control, they relie on wind coming up the walls and into the aerofoils but it only creates suction to pull air up through a tiny little piece of crap fan, weak at best😢
as usual, any great news about green energy posted in youtube or IG or other socmed, is nothing but a company marketing effort only. Why? Because there is no information at all about the effectiveness and durability of those turbines. Like, how many watts per hours they can generate, how slow the wind speed can be captured, can it really replace fossil fueled electricity, can it withstand for 10-20 years, how much cost for its rotor maintenance, etc.... They seemed to hide those, expecting their products to win the governmental project with large budget.
VAWTs are heavy ( i.e. lots of material to drive up cost ), have a swept area that's small and are generally inherently unbalanced which means theyll destroy themselves quickly. And people like to install them in poor wind conditions. Consequently efficiency and yield are poor to damn poor.
*Nonsense! All practical tests show that small wind turbines hardly generate any electricity,* because hardly any wind blows close to the ground.* Moreover, the wind is extremely gusty, which almost always greatly reduces the service life. Only those who MUST be off grid in winter should install a large wind turbine on a high tower. Otherwise: Forget wind power! *Solar systems, on the other hand, reliably generate over 25 -30 years electricity at approx. 3 to 8 cents/kWh.* Reliable and extremely low-maintenance.
Strong unbearable noice? A ridiculous claim. I live not far from one that produces lots of clean energy and the constant exaggerated claims I hear of ”strong unbearable noice” irritates me.
Big turbines make almost no noise - We have a bunch in a high wind zone, just down the road. I go stand under them and wonder how anyone could complain. Cars and motorcycles are louder.
Devices like these need to be up and away from vandals. They can't be anywhere someone can kick them or deform them. Young people don't respect this stuff, and don't make them out of metal. Metal scrap thieves will rip them down. If they can be spray painted, they must be well out of reach.
Wind energy generated near the ground or on roof tops is a dumb idea, if you must use wind, you want to go for the tallest towers and largest blades you can build. If you are in the USA, your per capita primary energy use is 300GJ/yr, see Wikipedia or LLNL Energy flow graph. Each solar panel of 250W 1.5sq m produces about 1.1GJe/yr in the US NE, and a bit more in the SW. So every US citizen needs about 300 solar panels per person to offset all fossil fuels or the equiv in wind since solar and wind have similar energy output per land area. intermittent
No matter the type of turbine used, if it can be reached by humans, there will be IDIOTS that will vandalised the turbine units by these mindless humans.
Do you even read your scripts? First you say that the Aeromine doesn't have blades. Then you explain that it does have blades, but they're hidden. Make up your mind! Of course it has blades. It wouldn't be a wind turbine if it didn't. Hire someone with brains to write for you.
They are to small. Wind has low power density. To actually produce usefull power levels the turbine must be big and the wind has to blow hard. Otherwise money wasted, no matter the design. Physics. Get solar.
These will be squeaky landfill fodder in the first 5 years of use. There's nothing that says "robust" about these units. Also, they say nothing about who owns/maintains these little monsters. Are they suggesting you own these independently from the grid? The video was all marketing and no real substance. As with all things in life, never buy version 1.0.
What do I think of when seeing wind turbines? I think of bird, insect and bat killers. 25 year working life max. Inefficiency. Expensive. Blight on the landscape. Impossible to rely on. That's just a few key points that came to mind within 10 seconds.
Some time ago, a bloke suggested a less “pretty” turbines of this type of generator installed along the side of main roads. The wind created by passing vehicles drive the turbines.
Yes Alpha 311 doing trials of turbines mounted on street lights to capture moving air from vehicles 🚗 in England
I had the same idea.
I want to put one on the highway in front of my land.
The Right of Way set back is 20 feet or so.
Yes, total nonsense and it will produce virtually no energy. It's pretty however, and we call it kinetic art.
That is inefficient. You're just increasing the drag on those cars and converting their gas into electricity.
I'd love to see the future of our cities!!!
They look a lot safer than what we have now. Good story and thanks.
Great to see your acknowledgment of just a few of the problems of the monstrous mobiles. Hope these ideas work but I foresee possible shake rattle and hum harmonics issues
I am looking to learn about wind power and want to create beautiful wind turbines like this.
What material are they made of ? Where can normal people buy one for their house / cabin ?
I often wonder why smaller turbines are not more widely used? I can only imagine the risk/reward would only be better as popularity grows.
They would also be much more easily repaired and recycled.
As the turbine gets bigger.
Its power production increases by magnitudes.
@@yasirrakhurrafat1142 Agreed, but it seems like there is opportunity for mass small turbines.
@@ev1558 I actually came up with a design myself a few days ago.
Which will allow you to scale either only horizontally or vertically.
In small increments.
Of course you can scale either way in either configuration.
But incremental scaling won't be very appealing in an uncooperative one.
Hopefully I can learn cad to design it.
By the way.
I wasn't very clear in my last comment.
Turbines' power output has a very significant change with increase in size.
Going from a 2 metre radius turbine to a 4m.. wouldn't double the power output. Rather it may increase power output by much much more than just double.
Altitude kinda works the same.
Equation for measuring power output changes for each are different.
Looks like good stuff!
how durable are these turbines?
Vertical-axis turbines are the worst kind of crap. Anyone who understands the laws of physics will agree with me.
OK so which is more efficient Aeromime or the tulip ? Ididn't get it,..
When can I purchase one for my flat roof, how much, will the state give me a rebate, and can I use it with net metering?
Yeah but how much power do they produce.....?
Where is available, what is cost of the unit. 5kw unit how much cost in India. If possible please let me know about this it is available in Bangalore.
Windmills of this type can supplement other renewable sources used by cities like solar panels.
when combined with underground green hydrogen generators they can produce green hydrogen at filling stations. this would eliminate transport of green hydrogen fuel from plant manufacturers to filling stations. more green hydrogen installations at filling stations reduces cost of green hydrogen at filling stations. everyone wins except the oil industry and that's a great and progressive thing.
The average house needs about 2kW generated continuously to be self sufficient. This energy stored in batteries helps you over the peaks. Add a few more batteries for when the wind stops and you are golden.
Having quite wind turbines is key .
new technology. small is good.
These small turbines can only produce small power ,very small power. This is a law of physics based on the size of the surface area of the blade that can capture the available wind. Just like you can put a small sail on a sail boat small wind is not economical as there is no economy of scale by adding more of them. Also vertical access looks good but can not compare to large turbines. Another thing that is uncommon sense is the power of the wind needs to be at the site you install it. The prevailing wind is at heights of 100 feet, not on the ground.
The prevailing wind is a reference to wind direction. Whilst wind is stronger the higher you go there is always wind even at ground level , it’s just not as strong.
@@skidaddledude1997 yes and that is why a turbine installed at a low elevation with a small blade surface area is not cost effective. This is lawn art.
Nice come to bharat County
Can you share a technical data sheet?
Why didn't you mention the company at 4:42? A company that combines wind turbines and solar panels.
It’s called PowerNest by Ibis Power
Where Can I get more information on this type of Turbine
Imagine the bird poop that those collet when the wind isn't going
How efficient is it compare to the traditional wind blade turbines?
Very poor, I'm afraid... That's why nobody uses them. :/
@@MiniBuster2 Why is efficiency very poor, when they begin to rotate at lower wind speeds?
@@GWAYGWAY1 I'm joining the question. Furthermore - don't forget it takes much less space than traditional turbine, so more can be constructed in one place, plus it's much which is also an important factor.
@@GWAYGWAY1mechanically unreliable, resource intensive, small swept area ( read power
Toys with very little potential. Will make money for those who promote them and sell them but no money for the suckers who buy them. How many to replace a 12MW horizontal axis turbine? 50,000? 250,000 ? Sorry but they are rubbish.
Up to now I saw these kind who where tri-phase 220V or 24-48-96V how to connect to the public network ? ( I have already 4 solarpanels with 2 invertors to 220V )
spin flywheels with the wavts, axle down to ground for simplicity, like a oil drill tower
you mean an inverted bladeless turbine, huh
add some magnetic gear systems
stop being a burden to others, by our/your demands, diy, as trade exchange is not a living, its slavery
50% really, so wind must blow always!
Could your noiseless turbines withstand, in general, the entire force of super typhoons (e.g. Alert Level 5) here in the Philippines? 🤔
dont expect too much..lol...it need super military grade quality turbines which huge cost make their products unmarketable. I would say, their quality still stand at "toy grade" i.e. to charge e-bike, your gadgets and small electric tools.
Can your home withstand it or a landslide
more importantly - can your house - if your infrastructure/house are leveled with the ground what do you need the turbine for👀👀
Super dupa question what do you think genius
The aeromine require placement in areas that have a consistent wind direction
Can you please share email address of this company? We want to reach out to them.
This style has been tried and tested for over 2 decades. They simply aren't efficient enough. They would need to be nearly weightless and high up to even pay for themselves in 10 years.
Well it seems to me that the flower turbines could form sails on these large towers in the Ocean and on land... choosing windy areas of course??
Wouldn’t the airfoil design be yet more efficient if they were directional; turning into the wind no matter what direction it was coming from? In that fixed position, it looks (to my untrained eye) as if it’s going to miss out on potential energy if it’s coming from behind or to the side!
Yes it suffers from no directional control, they relie on wind coming up the walls and into the aerofoils but it only creates suction to pull air up through a tiny little piece of crap fan, weak at best😢
How to order them
Kindly tell these availability
How can one get to buy the flower wind turbine? Please let me know
New idea, wind turbines that are made out of solar panels
2 KV wind turbine cost how much?
as usual, any great news about green energy posted in youtube or IG or other socmed, is nothing but a company marketing effort only. Why? Because there is no information at all about the effectiveness and durability of those turbines. Like, how many watts per hours they can generate, how slow the wind speed can be captured, can it really replace fossil fueled electricity, can it withstand for 10-20 years, how much cost for its rotor maintenance, etc.... They seemed to hide those, expecting their products to win the governmental project with large budget.
VAWTs are heavy ( i.e. lots of material to drive up cost ), have a swept area that's small and are generally inherently unbalanced which means theyll destroy themselves quickly.
And people like to install them in poor wind conditions.
Consequently efficiency and yield are poor to damn poor.
*Nonsense! All practical tests show that small wind turbines hardly generate any electricity,* because hardly any wind blows close to the ground.*
Moreover, the wind is extremely gusty, which almost always greatly reduces the service life.
Only those who MUST be off grid in winter should install a large wind turbine on a high tower. Otherwise: Forget wind power!
*Solar systems, on the other hand, reliably generate over 25 -30 years electricity at approx. 3 to 8 cents/kWh.* Reliable and extremely low-maintenance.
I would rather have co2 scrubbers on roofs than wind turbines, where i live unless a storm is baring down we have zero wind .
Strong unbearable noice? A ridiculous claim. I live not far from one that produces lots of clean energy and the constant exaggerated claims I hear of ”strong unbearable noice” irritates me.
What if the wind doesn't blow? That sucks
Price
Life
Installation
Maintenance etc
Small Modular Reactor - Always On - Zero CO2 - Extremely Safe.
Where can I buy this :) please respond
The standard horizontal axis wind turbine is more efficient.
Apparently you never lived near train tracks 😮😅
Talk about noise pollution 😢
Big turbines make almost no noise - We have a bunch in a high wind zone, just down the road. I go stand under them and wonder how anyone could complain. Cars and motorcycles are louder.
The only real problem is cost per Watt. Some figures would be useful.
Have delt with companies promoting this type of thing for years and have never been able to get a buisness case fro any of them! Snake oil?
Devices like these need to be up and away from vandals. They can't be anywhere someone can kick them or deform them. Young people don't respect this stuff, and don't make them out of metal. Metal scrap thieves will rip them down. If they can be spray painted, they must be well out of reach.
Is there any reason they could not make 30+ metre turbines?
need a much stronger way to anchor it, expensive, also bigger means 1 failure has big impact.
These wind Turbines kill Fish
Wind energy generated near the ground or on roof tops is a dumb idea, if you must use wind, you want to go for the tallest towers and largest blades you can build.
If you are in the USA, your per capita primary energy use is 300GJ/yr, see Wikipedia or LLNL Energy flow graph.
Each solar panel of 250W 1.5sq m produces about 1.1GJe/yr in the US NE, and a bit more in the SW.
So every US citizen needs about 300 solar panels per person to offset all fossil fuels or the equiv in wind since solar and wind have similar energy output per land area.
intermittent
but where do you store all energy if the wind doesn't blow?
No matter the type of turbine used, if it can be reached by humans, there will be IDIOTS that will vandalised the turbine units by these mindless humans.
Sorry but vertical windmills are iver 1000yrs old🎉🎉🎉😂
Do you even read your scripts? First you say that the Aeromine doesn't have blades. Then you explain that it does have blades, but they're hidden. Make up your mind! Of course it has blades. It wouldn't be a wind turbine if it didn't. Hire someone with brains to write for you.
He means visible blades outside all are in the inside. Try to understand him with a big heart!
Calm down little Matty.
I read where due to high energy costs in Europe, BASF is considering moving to Asia.
How easy is it to recycle these? The blades on the large windmills are going to be the next environmental disaster as they barely recyclable.
They are to small. Wind has low power density. To actually produce usefull power levels the turbine must be big and the wind has to blow hard. Otherwise money wasted, no matter the design. Physics. Get solar.
Very poor writing.
These will be squeaky landfill fodder in the first 5 years of use. There's nothing that says "robust" about these units. Also, they say nothing about who owns/maintains these little monsters. Are they suggesting you own these independently from the grid? The video was all marketing and no real substance. As with all things in life, never buy version 1.0.
What a joke, Nuclear power is the answer. Wind power is pathetic
looks even more disgusting
What do I think of when seeing wind turbines?
I think of bird, insect and bat killers.
25 year working life max.
Inefficiency.
Expensive.
Blight on the landscape.
Impossible to rely on.
That's just a few key points that came to mind within 10 seconds.
Scam.
AI generated crap.
I find them ugly - just personal taste
JR
How many needed c
To create 15 to 20000 watts