I was at Total Wine last week and watched a couple of young women buy TWO CASES (12 bottles!!!) of SirDavis. I admit it is a good looking bottle, but I could get 2 bottles of superior rye for the same cost of one SirDavis. You do you, boo.
My theory is that it does not qualify as a straight rye whiskey because they are aging in USED barrels even in the first round of aging. The website and every press release says, "SirDavis goes through two rounds of aging. First, in American oak barrels, followed by a second maturation in Pedro Ximénez sherry casks." Conspicuously missing is the normal phrase "New charred-oak barrels". My theory is that they are aging in USED rye MGP barrels (esp since I believe these are cheap compared to new barrels or used bourbon barrels). I think this also explains the "whisky" spelling, because they are aging in all used barrels more like Scotch and Japanese whisky vs bourbon and rye traditions.
It is possible to use a new charred barrel without saying so. If the label says it's a straight rye, by definition it aged in a new charred barrel even if the label doesn't say so, because the law requires it.
The whiskey / whisky spelling is always interesting. Makers drops the E and so does old forester. Plus compare a black cap Early times BIB with a blue cap…. Saz put the E back.
great video. one thing you did leave out is the mash bill is 51 rye 49 malt which I have never tried before. don't think ill be trying this one but thought id throw that out to everyone
I was going to mention this as well - thanks. The nearly even split between rye and barley kinda threw me. I won’t be buying a bottle but will be glad to try a pour if I see it somewhere.
Fair & balanced review. I speculate there might be another reason to register under category 142 instead of 102... additives are permitted under 142. Given the young age, I wouldn't be too surprised to see some additives and coloring agents (eg E150a which is commonly used in Scotch).
I think you could be right. The whiskey does taste like they used sherry casks to mask youth. I wouldn't doubt the whiskey has coloring. It's got a nice color in the bottle. I really wish no coloring was allowed in any spirit. It's false advertising if you ask me.
I did some more digging and their website states: Does SirDavis contain any additives? SirDavis is crafted using no additives or coloring including E15OA. The only explanation is the age theory (that I can think of).
I asked Lindsey to record with me last night, but she was too busy. I explained that we didn't release a review last week and we couldn't miss two weeks, so I was going to do it myself. I was up stairs for a couple of hours and I went down to get her ipad (for the teleprompter) and she was like, what were you doing up there for all this time if you were not recording? I said "writing the greatest podcast script I have every created" 🤣. I was pretty excited about what I found!
@@BourbonRealTalk I love it. A history nerd and I love all the research and details. Still setting to wrap my head around the age statement stuff and your theory
Taylor Fladgate Ports are amongst the best in the industry. Their vintage Port can age for 5+ decades and continue to improve. I'd agree their Ruby Port is forgettable, but is fine for mixing cocktails.
This is a very interesting breakdown of the behind the scenes. I love it Randy, thanks for the insight on everything that has been talked about in the whiskEy community
Sounds like B put some new lyrics in a song..."If you wanted me to like it shoulda put some age on it." Imma steer well clear of this one but as always, appreciate the in depth review...always learn something here!
Great sleuthing! You have mentioned in the past that your palate is sensitive to sulfur notes of the sort I would expect to accompany PX sherry cask finishing. When you assess such a whiskey, how do you adjust for that factor?
I say drink what you like. Was at a raffle the other night. Guaranteed a bottle as there were more bottles than people. The third guy drawn passed up all kinds of stuff, including Russell's 15 and EHT SiB rye, for an EHT small batch because it's his favorite bottle and hard to find. People like what they like.
@@iowabassman4701not only that, but some people can’t afford to drop $250 on a single bottle (Russel’s 15), even if they do win the opportunity to purchase it.
This is, first and foremost, a marketing job. If I see it at a bar, I'll probably try it out of curiosity. I would expect it to be exactly as described in this video. It comes from a good source, and I'm sure it is made well for what it is trying to be, which is a casual-friendly, cocktail-friendly whisky. There is a decent chance that I would buy it if the price was reasonable, as this sort of whisky can be a good warm-up pour before moving on to the firewater. Unfortunately, celebrity branding and a fancy bottle naturally result in a price that is way too high. Somewhere, I heard that this is a high malt mash bill, so it might not be quite the same as the usual MGP rye. I've recently found a few high malt ryes that aren't costly. Johnnie Walker High Rye is a high malt rye that works fine as a simple warm-up pour or cocktail mixer. It is 45% ABV, which is surprising since inexpensive blended Scotch is almost always 40%. It's nothing fancy, and the bottle isn't as eye catching as the SirDavis, but the price is right for what it delivers. Save your money and buy this instead. And if you want some stronger Sherry flavor, just buy a bottle of Pedro Ximenez Sherry and mix a little of it into the whisky.
@@eafarrar I'll keep an eye out for that. I'm finding that I like a nearly half-and-half rye and barley mix. They should bottle a cask strength version of SirDavis. I'm sure they would charge too much for it, but it would be a tasty pour.
Thanks for this video. The majority of what I enjoyed was the educational info that you shared that explained the legality of this industry. I certainly don’t plan on buying this or almost any celebrity whiskey. They tend to be under-proofed and overpriced.
Why does the brand spell whisky without an "E" while made in America? (Per their site Lol) "At SirDavis, we're not always conventional when it comes to whisky norms, starting with our unique spelling of 'whisky'. Our signature mash bill and its uniquely high barley content with a sherry cash finish draws inspiration from global whisky styles such as Japanese and Scottish whiskies, both known for omitting the 'e' in whisky. Our mission is to invite the next generation of luxury whisky drinkers into the category, transcending traditional American whisky norms to embrace global tastes, and inspire consumers to reimagine whisky."
Im under the impression that a rye or bourbon does not have to have any age statement. But when you add the "Straight" moniker is when it must be at least 4years old unless you state that it is younger. But may be no lower than 2 years regardless of the age statement. Thought?
You are correct. 0-2 Bourbon 2-4 Straight Bourbon with age statement 4+ Straight Bourbon no age statement required Same with all the other mash bill whiskey's including rye.
The website says: Does SirDavis contain any additives? SirDavis is crafted using no additives or coloring including E15OA. I think given the darkness of PX sherry finishing you wouldn't need coloring.
Yes, but they explain that when they were launching they wanted the public to know their whiskey was a good as scotch. No explanation for an American whiskey made by a person who was born in raised in the USA is suspect.
The fundamental difference between a straight rye and a rye is the ability to blend in additives. When bourbon was made a distinct spirit of the United States you could no longer add flavors or non alcohol blenders to any bourbon, straight or other wise. That is not the case for rye. A rye without the straight designation can have 1.99% added flavors created in a laboratory and no more than 2.5% non alcohol blenders. So it’s most likely older than 4 years old but has flavors and caramel coloring added.
From the website: Does SirDavis contain any additives? SirDavis is crafted using no additives or coloring including E15OA. It is legal nuance, but they could not call it a straight and leave the age statement off unless it was 4 years when they dumped to go into the finishing barrel, but if they hit 4 in the finishing barrel they can drop the age but also have to drop the straight.
Regarding the regulations on age statements ... If a rye were to be aged 3 years in the first barrel and then finished for 1 year in a sherry barrel, are they allowed to put the age statement "4 Years" on the label?
Yes, they are allowed. The TTB now allows you to add secondary aging time to your total age statement (they didn't allow it in the past). In this case, rather than disclosing I believe they used the total 4 year age statement to avoid on all together.
Yes, and they tell you why. MM and Dickel both say it is because their whiskey is as good as scotch, and they wanted consumers to know it. The Brown family was from Scotland. It is odd that a person raised in Houston Tx would leave off the "e" with no explanation unless it was a decision from branding people who are used to dealing with scotch brands.
The whiskey isn't bad. It's definitely not a $90-$100. It's definitely not any better than the other MGP rye's out there. It tastes like they tried to finish a whiskey to cover up youth. Don't take my word for it. Try a shot...like I did. It'll save you a lot of money.
@@Mykkus I think you're right. Unfortunately, I think the whiskey in this bottle has been colored as well. Classifying it under 142 allows for coloring. I bet the real color of it looks a lot like dirty water.
10:32 Is it a legal requirement that the label say that a straight whisky is a straight whisky? If so, then the scenario you hypothesize is the only thing that makes sense to me. But if you don't have to put "straight" on the label even when a whisky qualifies for the designation, then it's possible - though it seems to me unlikely - that they just chose to omit it. Whether that's possible depends on whether the law requires the "straight" designation on the label. As to the spelling, I much prefer the Scottish version - whisky. But then I have Scottish ancestors. And I've heard that the Irish started putting the E into the word back in the 19th century in order to differentiate their stuff from Scotch. 🙂
There is a requirement that you have to put the information that most accurately describes the whiskey in the bottle, but if the whiskey was 3 years old when dumped to put in the PX sherry barrels, and it aged for 1 year in the second barrel, then they would have the option of calling it a straight with an age statement, or calling it just a rye without an age statement. I think it was the later.
Not sure why you started talking about bourbon in the middle of the video. Also, I thought straight whiskey only had to be 2 years old, but if it was under four it must be age stated. I guess I was wrong on that.
No, you're right. Straight whisky must be at least two years old, and if it's younger than four years it must have an age statement. And of course it has to follow all the other rules for that kind of whiskey - rye, bourbon, corn whisky, whatever. 🙂
All the rules are the same for mash bill whiskey like bourbon, rye, wheat whiskey, except that rye that isn't straight is allowed to have 2.5% adulteration (although they clearly state they do not use additives or coloring). 0-2 Bourbon 2-4 Straight Bourbon with age statement 4+ Straight Bourbon no age statement required I may have mistakenly switched to talking about bourbon, but given the above all the information applies.
I actually didn't know the mash bill when I wrote the script, but I was aware of the two standard MGP rye mash bills and knew it could have been either or both.
@@BourbonRealTalk didn’t know that was a standard? Interesting!!That’s the only thing that made it quasi interesting to me. If I get a chance to try a pour I may. But buying a bottle heck no 😂 Thanks for another great vid!
You mean all these videos I’ve seen of influencers from other, non bourbon fanatic channels were nothing more than targeted marketing though social media?
I take no exception to individuals who avoid my brand The Prideful Goat because it is an NDP. I try to provide a solid product at a solid price, but I understand when people see more value elsewhere. Cheers!
Lol @ the description when it has awards beating out other brands when submitted under a different name. I'd be shocked if any of you could be unbias unless it was a blind test.
You are obviously a Beyonce fan, and not an experienced whiskey drinker. That is OK. It is OK for you to love it, and it is OK for me to use my tremendous amount of whiskey experience and insider information to evaluate it for what it really is. Either side pretending like the other side is stupid for holding their opinion is just biased silliness.
@BourbonRealTalk the awards speak for themselves and others during blind testing. You don't want to give credit where credit is due likely because it's Beyoncé's product and you need to sell grief to the bottom feeding mouth breathers and create a safe space for them to be ugly. Bunch of "experts" with no expertise are gathered here.
@BourbonRealTalk you don't have any insiders that would speak to you about this brand in particular. They don't know what they're talking about and have fed you lies. Or you are probably lying about having inside info. Either way I doubt it. Bye now.
@@rem2799 I made space for you. Be happy with that. To anyone who knows whiskey, you sound foolish. I liked the whiskey just fine. I didn't say it tasted bad. It is just over priced for what it is. I am in a position to know. It does not mean it is bad. It doesn't mean people should not buy it. Also, people who hate the whiskey because they have a bad opinion of Beyonce are also entitled to that opinion. It does not make them "bottom feeding mouth breathers". Chill out. Don't speak as an authority on things you know nothing about. Make space for your fellow man. Give people the benefit of the doubt. Life is better that way.
Prideful Goat is the only Celebrity whiskey I’ll ever buy! 🥃
I appreciate it, but for the record I do not identify as a celebrity 🤣
I was at Total Wine last week and watched a couple of young women buy TWO CASES (12 bottles!!!) of SirDavis. I admit it is a good looking bottle, but I could get 2 bottles of superior rye for the same cost of one SirDavis. You do you, boo.
So interesting when it comes to filing paperwork and alcohol in the US. I feel like I learned a lot in this episode.
Glad it was informative!
My theory is that it does not qualify as a straight rye whiskey because they are aging in USED barrels even in the first round of aging. The website and every press release says, "SirDavis goes through two rounds of aging. First, in American oak barrels, followed by a second maturation in Pedro Ximénez sherry casks." Conspicuously missing is the normal phrase "New charred-oak barrels". My theory is that they are aging in USED rye MGP barrels (esp since I believe these are cheap compared to new barrels or used bourbon barrels). I think this also explains the "whisky" spelling, because they are aging in all used barrels more like Scotch and Japanese whisky vs bourbon and rye traditions.
It is possible to use a new charred barrel without saying so. If the label says it's a straight rye, by definition it aged in a new charred barrel even if the label doesn't say so, because the law requires it.
Class 142 requires new charred oak containers just like class 102, so this theory can not be right.
The whiskey / whisky spelling is always interesting. Makers drops the E and so does old forester. Plus compare a black cap Early times BIB with a blue cap…. Saz put the E back.
great video. one thing you did leave out is the mash bill is 51 rye 49 malt which I have never tried before. don't think ill be trying this one but thought id throw that out to everyone
I was aware that MGP had that mash bill, but I didn't know that was the one that was used.
I was going to mention this as well - thanks. The nearly even split between rye and barley kinda threw me. I won’t be buying a bottle but will be glad to try a pour if I see it somewhere.
Randy, so well done...appreciate you being so open about brands, and the geeky information is awesome
Glad you enjoyed it!
Fair & balanced review. I speculate there might be another reason to register under category 142 instead of 102... additives are permitted under 142. Given the young age, I wouldn't be too surprised to see some additives and coloring agents (eg E150a which is commonly used in Scotch).
I had not considered the 2.5% additive carve out for 142 rye. I suspect they use PX finish to give the young rye some color when proofed down.
I think you could be right. The whiskey does taste like they used sherry casks to mask youth. I wouldn't doubt the whiskey has coloring. It's got a nice color in the bottle. I really wish no coloring was allowed in any spirit. It's false advertising if you ask me.
I did some more digging and their website states:
Does SirDavis contain any additives?
SirDavis is crafted using no additives or coloring including E15OA.
The only explanation is the age theory (that I can think of).
Great review as always! Really appreciate your honesty and indepth reviews.
I really appreciate all the work you put into your videos to get the best facts that you can find.
I’m continuing to be blown away by your knowledge and research that you do to make these videos great
I asked Lindsey to record with me last night, but she was too busy. I explained that we didn't release a review last week and we couldn't miss two weeks, so I was going to do it myself. I was up stairs for a couple of hours and I went down to get her ipad (for the teleprompter) and she was like, what were you doing up there for all this time if you were not recording? I said "writing the greatest podcast script I have every created" 🤣. I was pretty excited about what I found!
@@BourbonRealTalk I love it. A history nerd and I love all the research and details. Still setting to wrap my head around the age statement stuff and your theory
I like the breakdown on all aspects of Sir Davis. Keep up the great videos. 👍
Love when you do these deep dive videos Randy, thank you!
The crowd buying Sir Davis is the same crowd that chased Taylor Port after it was "marketed" on TikTok. SMH
Taylor Fladgate Ports are amongst the best in the industry. Their vintage Port can age for 5+ decades and continue to improve. I'd agree their Ruby Port is forgettable, but is fine for mixing cocktails.
This is a very interesting breakdown of the behind the scenes. I love it Randy, thanks for the insight on everything that has been talked about in the whiskEy community
Glad you enjoyed it!
Excellent "knowledge-share!" Thank you!
If I were on LVMH’s list, I would hope for an Ardbeg or Glenmorangie before sir Davis
WOW! BRT Intelligence Agency on the case! Sagamore PX Sherry and Prideful Goat are two of my favorites! PASS for me. Great video!!
Sounds like B put some new lyrics in a song..."If you wanted me to like it shoulda put some age on it." Imma steer well clear of this one but as always, appreciate the in depth review...always learn something here!
Great sleuthing!
You have mentioned in the past that your palate is sensitive to sulfur notes of the sort I would expect to accompany PX sherry cask finishing. When you assess such a whiskey, how do you adjust for that factor?
I do, but I didn't get it on this whiskey.
A friend of mine bought a bottle and he likes it. He’s a Basil Hayden fan too:)
I say drink what you like. Was at a raffle the other night. Guaranteed a bottle as there were more bottles than people. The third guy drawn passed up all kinds of stuff, including Russell's 15 and EHT SiB rye, for an EHT small batch because it's his favorite bottle and hard to find. People like what they like.
@@iowabassman4701not only that, but some people can’t afford to drop $250 on a single bottle (Russel’s 15), even if they do win the opportunity to purchase it.
You are awesome. I am here for all of the nerdy whiskey talk and all of your investigations that you’ve done thank you thank you so much fun.
Thanks for being here!
This is, first and foremost, a marketing job. If I see it at a bar, I'll probably try it out of curiosity. I would expect it to be exactly as described in this video. It comes from a good source, and I'm sure it is made well for what it is trying to be, which is a casual-friendly, cocktail-friendly whisky. There is a decent chance that I would buy it if the price was reasonable, as this sort of whisky can be a good warm-up pour before moving on to the firewater. Unfortunately, celebrity branding and a fancy bottle naturally result in a price that is way too high.
Somewhere, I heard that this is a high malt mash bill, so it might not be quite the same as the usual MGP rye. I've recently found a few high malt ryes that aren't costly. Johnnie Walker High Rye is a high malt rye that works fine as a simple warm-up pour or cocktail mixer. It is 45% ABV, which is surprising since inexpensive blended Scotch is almost always 40%. It's nothing fancy, and the bottle isn't as eye catching as the SirDavis, but the price is right for what it delivers. Save your money and buy this instead. And if you want some stronger Sherry flavor, just buy a bottle of Pedro Ximenez Sherry and mix a little of it into the whisky.
Smoke Wagon bottles the same 51/49 rye at cask strength and older for less money.
@@eafarrar I'll keep an eye out for that. I'm finding that I like a nearly half-and-half rye and barley mix. They should bottle a cask strength version of SirDavis. I'm sure they would charge too much for it, but it would be a tasty pour.
@@heatherharrison264 I think they label it "Straight Rye Malted Barley" with the green medallion.
Thanks for this video. The majority of what I enjoyed was the educational info that you shared that explained the legality of this industry. I certainly don’t plan on buying this or almost any celebrity whiskey. They tend to be under-proofed and overpriced.
Beyoncé drinks whiskey as much as I drink wine coolers. Never
Weird comment since you don’t know her
Why does the brand spell whisky without an "E" while made in America? (Per their site Lol)
"At SirDavis, we're not always conventional when it comes to whisky norms, starting with our unique spelling of 'whisky'. Our signature mash bill and its uniquely high barley content with a sherry cash finish draws inspiration from global whisky styles such as Japanese and Scottish whiskies, both known for omitting the 'e' in whisky. Our mission is to invite the next generation of luxury whisky drinkers into the category, transcending traditional American whisky norms to embrace global tastes, and inspire consumers to reimagine whisky."
Im under the impression that a rye or bourbon does not have to have any age statement. But when you add the "Straight" moniker is when it must be at least 4years old unless you state that it is younger. But may be no lower than 2 years regardless of the age statement. Thought?
That's correct.
You are correct.
0-2 Bourbon
2-4 Straight Bourbon with age statement
4+ Straight Bourbon no age statement required
Same with all the other mash bill whiskey's including rye.
I've had a couple of other celebrity whiskeys and I found them underwhelming for it's price. It's just not taylored to us.
Great video
I’m always leery of celebrity whiskey..
I do not give two shits about celebrity brands or endorsements.
Agreed!
This could be like Templeton Rye. Not a straight rye because they added sugar or other flavorings
For what its worth, the website does claim there are no additives or coloring.
The website says:
Does SirDavis contain any additives?
SirDavis is crafted using no additives or coloring including E15OA.
I think given the darkness of PX sherry finishing you wouldn't need coloring.
Will her friend Diddy be releasing a prison wine made from of toilet water?
Maker’s Mark also left the ‘E’ off whiskey too. Weirdos lol
Yes, but they explain that when they were launching they wanted the public to know their whiskey was a good as scotch. No explanation for an American whiskey made by a person who was born in raised in the USA is suspect.
The fundamental difference between a straight rye and a rye is the ability to blend in additives. When bourbon was made a distinct spirit of the United States you could no longer add flavors or non alcohol blenders to any bourbon, straight or other wise. That is not the case for rye. A rye without the straight designation can have 1.99% added flavors created in a laboratory and no more than 2.5% non alcohol blenders. So it’s most likely older than 4 years old but has flavors and caramel coloring added.
From the website:
Does SirDavis contain any additives?
SirDavis is crafted using no additives or coloring including E15OA.
It is legal nuance, but they could not call it a straight and leave the age statement off unless it was 4 years when they dumped to go into the finishing barrel, but if they hit 4 in the finishing barrel they can drop the age but also have to drop the straight.
Regarding the regulations on age statements ...
If a rye were to be aged 3 years in the first barrel and then finished for 1 year in a sherry barrel, are they allowed to put the age statement "4 Years" on the label?
I think that why he brought up the 102 class and 142 class
Yes, they are allowed. The TTB now allows you to add secondary aging time to your total age statement (they didn't allow it in the past). In this case, rather than disclosing I believe they used the total 4 year age statement to avoid on all together.
Marketing cringe and sub par whiskEy at a premium....no thanks. It definitely tasted super young.
Love the video, but look… Makers Mark, Old Forester, and George Dickel all leave the E out of whisky… idk if that point is relevant.
Yes, and they tell you why. MM and Dickel both say it is because their whiskey is as good as scotch, and they wanted consumers to know it. The Brown family was from Scotland. It is odd that a person raised in Houston Tx would leave off the "e" with no explanation unless it was a decision from branding people who are used to dealing with scotch brands.
The whiskey isn't bad. It's definitely not a $90-$100. It's definitely not any better than the other MGP rye's out there. It tastes like they tried to finish a whiskey to cover up youth. Don't take my word for it. Try a shot...like I did. It'll save you a lot of money.
I think a lot of brands are finishing to cover the youth.
@@Mykkus I think you're right. Unfortunately, I think the whiskey in this bottle has been colored as well. Classifying it under 142 allows for coloring. I bet the real color of it looks a lot like dirty water.
Makers Mark calls itself Whisky in honor of their scottish/Irish heritage.
Yes, and I accept that as normal because they explain that.
10:32 Is it a legal requirement that the label say that a straight whisky is a straight whisky? If so, then the scenario you hypothesize is the only thing that makes sense to me. But if you don't have to put "straight" on the label even when a whisky qualifies for the designation, then it's possible - though it seems to me unlikely - that they just chose to omit it. Whether that's possible depends on whether the law requires the "straight" designation on the label.
As to the spelling, I much prefer the Scottish version - whisky. But then I have Scottish ancestors. And I've heard that the Irish started putting the E into the word back in the 19th century in order to differentiate their stuff from Scotch. 🙂
There is a requirement that you have to put the information that most accurately describes the whiskey in the bottle, but if the whiskey was 3 years old when dumped to put in the PX sherry barrels, and it aged for 1 year in the second barrel, then they would have the option of calling it a straight with an age statement, or calling it just a rye without an age statement. I think it was the later.
Not sure why you started talking about bourbon in the middle of the video. Also, I thought straight whiskey only had to be 2 years old, but if it was under four it must be age stated. I guess I was wrong on that.
No, you're right. Straight whisky must be at least two years old, and if it's younger than four years it must have an age statement. And of course it has to follow all the other rules for that kind of whiskey - rye, bourbon, corn whisky, whatever. 🙂
All the rules are the same for mash bill whiskey like bourbon, rye, wheat whiskey, except that rye that isn't straight is allowed to have 2.5% adulteration (although they clearly state they do not use additives or coloring).
0-2 Bourbon
2-4 Straight Bourbon with age statement
4+ Straight Bourbon no age statement required
I may have mistakenly switched to talking about bourbon, but given the above all the information applies.
Different mashbill though… 49% malt. It’s not the standard 95/5
I actually didn't know the mash bill when I wrote the script, but I was aware of the two standard MGP rye mash bills and knew it could have been either or both.
@@BourbonRealTalk didn’t know that was a standard? Interesting!!That’s the only thing that made it quasi interesting to me. If I get a chance to try a pour I may. But buying a bottle heck no 😂
Thanks for another great vid!
I want nothing to do with Beyonce or T Swift. The 👹 will come calling for them soon
He’s never tried anything like this before because it’s horrible 😂
You mean all these videos I’ve seen of influencers from other, non bourbon fanatic channels were nothing more than targeted marketing though social media?
I don't watch the other channels. Are the other channels saying it is a good buy?
The bottle is nice as a decanter for better whiskys.
Strong pass? More like a hard no on what I think is a pure money grab.
Love the ignorance of the comments and loads of bottom feeders.
I love Sir Davis, it is DELICIOUS! I love sipping it!!!
I would avoid sir Davis and prideful goat both. Stick with longstanding NDP’s and those who have been in the business’s long time.
I take no exception to individuals who avoid my brand The Prideful Goat because it is an NDP. I try to provide a solid product at a solid price, but I understand when people see more value elsewhere. Cheers!
Lol @ the description when it has awards beating out other brands when submitted under a different name. I'd be shocked if any of you could be unbias unless it was a blind test.
You are obviously a Beyonce fan, and not an experienced whiskey drinker. That is OK. It is OK for you to love it, and it is OK for me to use my tremendous amount of whiskey experience and insider information to evaluate it for what it really is. Either side pretending like the other side is stupid for holding their opinion is just biased silliness.
@BourbonRealTalk the awards speak for themselves and others during blind testing. You don't want to give credit where credit is due likely because it's Beyoncé's product and you need to sell grief to the bottom feeding mouth breathers and create a safe space for them to be ugly. Bunch of "experts" with no expertise are gathered here.
@BourbonRealTalk you don't have any insiders that would speak to you about this brand in particular. They don't know what they're talking about and have fed you lies. Or you are probably lying about having inside info. Either way I doubt it. Bye now.
@@rem2799 I made space for you. Be happy with that. To anyone who knows whiskey, you sound foolish. I liked the whiskey just fine. I didn't say it tasted bad. It is just over priced for what it is. I am in a position to know. It does not mean it is bad. It doesn't mean people should not buy it. Also, people who hate the whiskey because they have a bad opinion of Beyonce are also entitled to that opinion. It does not make them "bottom feeding mouth breathers". Chill out. Don't speak as an authority on things you know nothing about. Make space for your fellow man. Give people the benefit of the doubt. Life is better that way.
❤
Bottom line more celebrity garbage….
This is a huge PASS for me!
🤣😂🤣
13👍
If Beyonce involved, skip it
beyonce is going to jail for far worse then wiskey