I think you've mentioned in a few videos that - 23 LUFS is broadcast standard but - 16 LUFS is often preferred for online distribution. Any chance you could expand upon this in a future video?
Curtis I appreciate this. Here are some things I like (in no particular order) 1.) The notes at the beginning. Specifically the timing of them, like you understand that I can pause it if I need to which is great. 2.) Colors, I watch these at night sometimes and you keep the colors....gentle on my eyes 3.) You're cadence and voice. It's accurate, paced properly, clear, concise, relevant, and human. 4.) The info. You give us exactly what we need to know. 5.) Kindness. I see you pop up on other channels to comment sometimes and it's always kind, supportive, and makes me happy. 6.) Honesty honesty honesty. You tell it like it is. 7.) Have a great day man. Thanks for doing what you do. We random humans are ACTUAL humans that ACTUALLY appreciate you! Haha be well.
On 32 bit Float…I don’t know about anyone else, but I never thought I’d see the day when you could record something with clipping or really low and still be able to adjust to make it sound good. Blows my mind.
im having trouble using this as an interface for Cubase. I see all the channels in the input selection but when I hit record, there's no signal. may you please explain?
There are many reasons why yours is an excellent review but let me comment on one aspect. The lighting and product presentation is the best in the business. The colorful background, controlled depth of field combined with high res image and sharp focus make a very engaging video.
I have a bunch of recorders, but the X8 is probably the one I would keep if ai had to part all but one. It is a very good concept and gives you the most versaitility. A variety of inputs, a lot of ways you can attach mics to the recorder body. You also get a lot of functionality: it is a mixing board, a DSP processor, a mobile podcast studio. It can record 24 and 32 bit simultaneously. It has control apps for both iOS and Android. As audio interface it works both 24 or 32 bit now. Very- very close to perfect for my needs. And I am happy with the audio quality as well. Having said that I also have an F3 and an F8n Pro, and a few more. The X8 stacks up nicely. There are a few things in the software that could be improved on, but recording quality is on par. The only thing I find misleading is the headphone amplifier which is quity noisy. I thought it was preamp noise, but no, the recording is clean, just there is too much hiss in the headphones.
Just got the X8 and really enjoying it thus far. Coming from a mixpre 6-ii, the large touchscreen and easy to navigate UI is a godsend. As Curtis points out, the flexibility/versatility is probably what is the best thing about the X8.
I've had the DR100 MK3 for a couple years now and have not been disappointed. It has worked well even under fairly rough conditions, including heavy costal moisture in the air.
Your review is by far the best and most elaborated with detailed explanation. Now waiting for your Zoom F8n Pro review and workflow because i am gonna have one next month :D
As of September 2022, one advantage being seen in the touchscreen interface is the ability to revise and enhance the feature set offered. In the last year it gained solo monitoring of inputs and channels, Bluetooth timecode support, and ability to store and retrieve configurations for input dynamics as well as three customized configurations created in the manual mode or other app modes. Supposedly other stability fixes were also made in the firmware, and on release it clearly needed some. But unlike devices whose operation is heavily defined by physical control elements, the touchscreen UI allowed them to push the device out and later revise and enhance its feature set. At first it wasn't clear how much they'd do that, and perhaps they're done now, but they probably don't have to finished as room for more improvements remain.
@@curtisjuddReally appreciate your reviews, they're kinda the go-to trusted source for me and others.. So thought this might be best place to post update. Not so related to the touchscreen interface, but it also gained the ability to serve a 32 bit interface to the computer... And the price currently has a $100 (20%) discount from the $500 release price. I'm suspecting that will stick, as it seems like where this quality level product should have been from the start... Just as your reaction to the initial price reflected. My guess is they rushed it out unpolished at a high asking price to grab the opportunity. ...The launcher wheel in the UI always had those three empty spots that were begging for a future function, Now there are three user system configs that drop into those spots on the launcher.
For sound designers, the X8's ultrasonic noise spikes in 192K mode are definitely significant! Take a recording, drop it a few octaves, and that noise will become a high-pitched audible tone. Whether you could work around that without spoiling the sample would depend on the application.
Nice review thanks. I'm torn between the X8 and the Zoom F6 for recording rehearsals of classical music ensembles. 32 bit float is going to be a life saver so I'm sure either will be a big upgrade on a zoom h1!
Hi Curtis, great review! (as always). I’m in the same situation - recording classical music (classical guitar specifically); is your preference for the Zoom F6 due to the quality of the preamps? Many Thanks.
I had a traumatic experience where I was filming an EDM festival for my first time, using the X8 to capture audio off the DJ mixer. Because I enabled pre-record for my first time, when I hit record and saw the border of the screen illuminate red and heard the inputs through my headphones I assumed it was good to go. When I went to listen back to the recording after filming all night long (New Years in Miami is wild), there was no audio captured. People need to know, this recorder must have the record button pressed twice to actually record.
I am very glad I watched this video before purchasing. The 192khz 32 bit is not really necessary for what I do and the other pitfalls were really deal killers for me, and I went with the Zoom H8 instead for its capsules and versatility.
Thank you for mentioning the hum above 20kHz in the higher sample rate recordings. I was so excited about this recorder but going off the reviews it's just got too many issues to make me confident in buying it.
Yes, I wouldn't have noticed it since I do not usually record at 192kHz so we have to credit several audiophiles for pointing that out. I'm not sure why hum above 20kHz is a practical concern, but thought it should be mentioned.
@@curtisjudd the concern is more for sound design purposes. When you record in the ultrasonic range you need to re-pitch those sounds to bring them into the human hearing range. So the hum on the X8 at 25kHz (even dropped by one octave) would become about 12.5kHz, well within human hearing.
feels like its in a weird spot with the F6 a little above with better pre amps, more xlr inputs ect and the F3 below if you just need 2 channels of 32bit float but I don't see what tascam could do here.
great video thanks! I've just bought the X8 and have a shoot coming up where they plan to use Tentacle Sync and send me audio timecode to sync up later in post. How do I mute the timecode monitor channel so I don't have it coming through the headphones?
Very much appreciate you taking a look at this. Some of your comments make me think that they only used a single A/D converter instead of using 2 to get a wider dynamic range. Of course, with previous Tascam recorders, the safety track option extends the dynamic range by 12dB, which can be handy in situations where this is needed. Personally, I'm most disappointed by the battery life. If you got about 4 hours with lithium batteries, that would suggest NiMH batteries would only get about 2 to 2.5 hours. This makes it a no-go for me, as I tend to use these types of recorders out in nature to get ambient recordings. My money would be better spent on a set of dedicated stereo mics to go with either my Tascam DR-44wl or DR-680mkII. (Something I have been considering, although not as convenient. Handling noise is another area of disappointment, especially since these devices are supposedly made to be held while recording.
Indeed exactly as i am thinking. Their stated Dynamic Range is only 112 dB ( Left completely out of public view for specifications and had to get through email contact with the engineering department ) For Reference these two other 32 Bit Float Recorders Zoom F6 has 132 dB Dynamic Range Sound Devices Mix Pre 3 ii Series Dynamic Range is 142 dB. So at 20 dB Dynamic Range Headroom Missing compared to a Zoom F6 and 30 dB ! vs Sound Devices Mix Pre ii... That's a whole LOT of missing Headroom! So where and how did Tascam Engineers Fail at this and huge amount of missing Dynamic Range especially for 32Bit Float
Thanks Alan. The safety track recording feature increases headroom but not overall dynamic range. I believe that they used multiple converters per input, but the relatively lower dynamic range of this device vs. the Sound Devices MixPre II series is likely due to poorer quality analogue preamplifiers.
@@curtisjudd It's possible I misunderstood your comments regarding the dynamic range available, so I guess I'll watch for a comparison between this and another Tascam device to see if there's any advantage here in that regard. Regarding combining tracks to increase dynamic range, this requires special post processing and setting levels to put the louder portions of the track into the safety track (thus reducing the headroom normally reserved as a safety), but it can be done.
@@alantuttphotography Yes, understood. Note that with the safety track recording, it is potentially a bit of a compromise because on the track recorded at -12dB, the noise floor is potentially closer to the sound source, or at best, the noise floor is different and so the job of blending that can be somewhat complex. It really depends on how they implement the safety track recording feature. If they're just using a pad, it may not sound the same as if they actually used a second preamplifier with 12 dB less gain applied (like on the ZOOM F series recorders).
I purchased this recorder to replace the Zoom H8 because of the following reasons: 1. The Zoom H8 has a micro-USB connector which is irritating. The X8 has a USB-C connector which is MUCH more convenient. 2. The Tascam X8 has 32 bit float recording. 3. The X8's touchscreen is far superior to the H8's touchscreen - it's not even close. 4. The X8 is far more intuitive to use. 5. Recording music on the X8 with effects like reverb is easier and it is well laid out in the app. For amateurs like me, recording my original songs on the Tascam X8 is FAR easier than the Zoom H8. With the Zoom H8, often it would not start recording when I hit the record button twice, and it was hard to see on the touchscreen to monitor what was going on. On the X8, this has not been a problem. The entire record process for music using music app or recording without the app is streamlined and laid out far better with the Tascam X8. For people new to audio recording, this is extremely helpful. 6. The recording quality of the X8 appears to be at least equal to the H8. The Tascam X8 recordings of my original songs generally sound better than those I made on the Zoom H8. I am a skilled musician and songwriter and I CAN hear the difference. I am not sure why they sound better, but they do. Without effects, the difference is not world shaking, but with effects, it is night and day. The Tascam allows amateurs to easily add effects in the music app. 7. You can control every function of the X8 from an android phone remotely via the Bluetooth dongle. On the Zoom H8, you cannot control every function and their remote dongle only works with IOS (Apple) phones or tablets. The remote function on the H8 only lets you monitor the recordings and you cannot adjust the settings remotely. Every review of the Bluetooth remote control of the X8 has said it works very well with no delay. 8. I don't have a need to record in 192 kHz. Plus to do so would require expensive microphones. One professional reviewer mentioned that not many mics have the ability to record in that high sample rate range. I will take their word for it. Having said that, the 192 kHz feature is available on the X8, but the H8 does not have this feature at all. 9. The cost is fairly equal. The X8 is about a $100.00 more. Thanks for your thorough review - it was excellent. I have two questions. Do you think there is a hearable difference between the Zoom F6 or other higher level recorder (from any manufacturer) and the Tascam X8 for music and song recording, when recorded at 44 kHz, 48 kHz and 96 kHz? If there would be a difference that is audible, what prosumer audio recorder would you recommend in the price range up to $2,000.00? Thanks, Frank Long
Thanks for sharing, Frank. I haven't found sample rates to make a big difference unless you are doing sound design work and plan to slow the sound down for sound effects. However, the 32-bit float can make a practical difference if you happen to set your gain incorrectly. So the difference between the Zoom F6 and the X8 is largely going to be dynamic range in 32-bit float mode. If you're recording REALLY loud music and you have a high quality microphone which can handle high SPLs (e.g., >130dB SPL) then the 32-bit float on the F6 is going to be a safer bet. But if you set your gain appropriately, you can make fine recordings with the X8.
@@curtisjudd Thanks, your advice is very helpful. I feel a little bit like I am in a dark room and I am trying to "feel" my way through to the light when it comes to sound recording. There is a big learning curve to understanding both audio and video recording.
Thanks for this review, Curtis. I wonder, is 32 bit float available if you record a podcast with 3 or 4 people? I ask, because I read somewhere, that 32 bit float is not available in the Podcast settings.
I've heard the same thing. I was wondering if recording in manual mode would be the solution for instead of the default "podcast" settings. Plus I suppose Curtis would say it shouldn't be a sweat since its just talking heads that would be recorded.
Podcast recording app disappoints on this: It's 24bit 48khz recording exclusively. Much worse... If you have recording settings at 32bit float, and open up the podcast app, it bumps the device setup into 24b/48k, affecting all subsequent recording. So you need to go back into the devices record settings and reset them after opening the podcast app. Exploring the device after getting it...I was puzzled about how things kept getting reset. A thorough read of the manual told me the podcast app was exclusively 24b/48k, and examination showed it was undoing previous settings across all recording.
Good job as usual. Seems to me that 32 bit is best as a single operator tool when you cannot mind the camera and and lighting and worry about things like Make up and what the talent is warning and the set and constantly monitor audio levels at the same time.
Thank you for a great review! You mention other recorders you have tested with lower self noise than the X8. Can't stretch to Sound Devices prices right now but if you have any thoughts on low self noise portable field recorders that would be really appreciated. I am considering a Zoom F3 to replace my H4N.
I've been looking at the Zoom H recorders for a few years now and couldn't get my head around the fact that they still don't use USB C. So bought this immediately (can't use your links for EU), but did subscribe :-)
Great review and demo but I think I'll stick with my Zoom H6, F8N and H3VR. I also use a Tascam 680 & 680 mk2, a DR-60D mkII, a DR-70D and a HDP2 so am familiar with both Zoom and Teac-Tascam units and have found both positives and negatives over time with both companies products. Lately I have found that the Zoom products seem just slightly better for my needs but I respect and use devices from both. Your reviews have helped me come to purchase decisions and kept me informed of the new products as they come available.
I have a number of both Tascam and Zoom recorders in my studio and remote equipment collection and I recently added the Zoom H8 to my larder. What tipped the scales in it's favour was it's ability to record 10 XLR microphone sources at the same time (with the 4 mic adaptor). Nothing against Tascam as I have loved their equipment over the years (especially the 680 series) but currently Zoom has generally been a few steps ahead of Tascam in sound quality (I prefer the Zoom sound over the current Tascam sound) and function while bringing upgrades to market at a reasonable price. My favourite Zoom is still my F8N but the H8 is a great portable handheld option especially with the extra microphone inputs. The H8 also has the advantage of allowing me to use all the adaptors that I purchased for my H6 thus saving me money for the specialty adaptors already owned. The H6 is a great backup for remotes when I don't need the extra microphones or when I need to record the same audio from multiple perspectives beyond ten microphones. An example being recording fireworks from two locations without wanting to run extended cabling from one recording to distant wired microphones. Although another option was to run wireless microphones and receive at a single recorder.
Thank you for the review.. Now waiting for Zoom H6-II with 32 bit float, USB-C connection and faster bootup. For now, the Zoom H5 continues to be budget convenience king (along with F4 for more 'pro' work)
Agree, I got the XLR-module for my H5. I can use it for lavs that do not require phantom power. With backup recording it will protect from clipping in most situations. The XLR inputs I use for boom mics. In a dialogue or interview setup it will give you three recordings of the same source, plenty to work with. The signal from the boom mic needs to be pretty hot, like Rode NTG5. Using the optional remote, removes handling noises. Adjusting gain is out with the remote but you can start, stop the recording and playback. In addition, the H5 takes full size SD cards. microSDs are more fragile. Mini USBs are sturdier than micro, also a feature of H5. Why Zoom chose microUSB for H8 is beyond reason.
Would you say that the TASCAM DR-701D's preamps are better than the X8's? And how do you rate the DR-701D preamps compared to the Zoom F6? I compared the quality of the DR-701D preamps to the Mixpre 3 and I have to say I like the DR-701D better. They sound warmer, more natural. The Mixpre 3 has a certain digital hardness in the sound. Or not?
I've been waiting/hoping you would do a review of this as there are not that many quality reviews out there for this recorder. I've been seriously considering getting this unit since it was announced but there seemed to be a a lot of minor bugs with it and I couldn't decide between this and the Sony PCM-D10. The Sony interface isn't as fancy as the Tascam but Sonys just seem to work. Thanks for the review.
Thank you so much for the excellent review; I've been waiting for your take on this unit. The X8 looks really interesting for many use cases, but I'm left wishing Tascam put the R&D into different areas. Personally, I'd rather have something like a Zoom H5 (smaller, more physical controls) but with improved preamps and headphone amp rather than 32bit recording and a big screen with lots of presets. The X8 looks like it might be a super versatile and popular device after a few minor revisions to fix it's early issues, but I'm left wondering if a Centrance Mixerface (top of my budget :-) might be a better option for my uses. Or maybe Zoom will upgrade the H5 with improved preamps :-) hope springs eternal! Anyway, thank you again so much for your excellent channel and review.
My ideal recorder at this form factor would be the H6 but with locking xlr inputs, locking faders, better preamps, better headphone amp and a quieter stereo mic. That's a lot I know but competitors offer all of that. What I like about the H6 is actually it's interface. Easy to control faders on the fly. Easy to arm/solo any track in the click of a button. The essentials are right in front of you and don't require a screen and menu to navigate.
part of me thinks it's interesting that it has basically an android phone built in... but a bigger part of me wishes these things were just hard knobs and switches. I cant stand dealing with touch screen in the field.
Dear Patrick, I think we could all benefit from more analogue controls. And we could all benefit from some of the food you photograph as well. I hope some day to share a meal with you. 🙏
I was waiting for your review. I ordered it anyway for the 32bit and UI has great options. I say it's real weakness is it's main selling factor is the screen breaking also expensive. I don't have a high quality audio solution I had the DR 60 that I loved but this device covers alot of ground fast with presets. Thanks
Having a really hard time attempting to use the X8 as an interface with Audition (in multi track), no matter what settings on the computer or tascam, no audio is displayed when the track is armed and record is pressed. Perhaps a video demonstrating exactly how to make it happen is useful since no one has one.
Thanks, Curtis. This helps. I’m having a little analysis paralysis and can’t decide which way to go. I really only need 4 inputs for mics. How does this stack up to Zoom’s offerings in August 2023?
Hi Curtis...thanks for your unbiased videos. You channel is real gold. If I may ask you. Does the 32bit float allow more agreesive post processing? I am wondering if I could think about it like recording 12 bit raw video which handle way more editing that other compressed format?? Thanks
Nice Video! Does Tascam plan to add more of the apps on the recorder? Or are the preinstalled the final ones? Any plans to try the AK-BT1 bluetooth remote control dongle too?
Curtis congrats in another piece of review! One question I’m between F6 and X8, I’ve noticed you told somebody in the comments that you prefer F6. Anything in particular for this advice? The preamps? Build quality? Form factor? Sound? I’m very interested in the float 32 recording.
Thank you for a comprehensive review Curtis. Not exactly related to the content, but will you please share the identity of the mounting plate you used, seen at about 15:13 in the video? Looks like a nice, large, accessible 1/4-20 thumb wheel within a frame that might also include additional attachment points for a battery tray or other useful accessories. Thanks again, - James Audial Delta LLC Manassas, VA
Curtis , you are our audio King , thank you so much for explaining everything so thoroughly to us mere mortals!! I can’t make a single audio related purchase without checking out your opinions first! Let me ask you one thing my friend… I do a lot of video work with doctors, dentists and etc for social media… been using lavalier mics but wanted to step up my game , so I picked up a mkh 416 this week… would you say that this tascam would be a good combination with it?? I would use mostly for spoken word… Thank you so much my friend
Hi Curtis! Great video as always. Do I understand correctly at 13:54 that the Zoom F3 does have better pre-amps than this Tascam? (and therefore will get more out of the 32bit float with decent microphones). This Portacapture has a lot more features, the nice screen, the included mics etc, but I think I'd do with the bare bones F3. It's also cheaper, and if it does sound better I think that would make the F3 a no-brainer for me.
Hi Roger, no, I haven't tested the F3 yet, still waiting for my copy to arrive. However, if they use the same preamps as the F6, then yes, they'll surely have more dynamic range than the X8. I wouldn't say that they sound better, just to be precise.
I like how you included a bit of musical use for this recorder Curtis. I won't be a buyer for this new Tascam recorder but it's a good trend to see 32 bit float recording now available in these consumer type recorders with onboard mic capsules. I use and love the Zoom F6 these days and have the H6 in my bag as backup when I'm recording my concerts. Thanks for the great video again!
Announced today: “With the introduction of the V1.30 firmware update, the Portacapture X8 now has the capability to use 32-bit float point resolution when using the unit as a USB audio interface to a DAW (Digital Audio Workstation). This facilitates wider dynamic range, higher resolution, and greater audio quality for better overall record quality. The 32-bit float technology enables audio to be dynamically controlled and edited virtually without limitations. Clipped audio segments can easily be corrected and, similarly, low level audio passages can be adjusted to a higher dB level. Paul Youngblood, Director of Product Marketing at TASCAM, commented on the new features offered by the V1.30 firmware update, “The Portacapture X8 has proven itself to be a full-featured, powerful handheld recorder both on its own or when used in tandem with a computer. As a company, we strive to listen carefully to our users, as this enables us to learn first-hand how our equipment gets used in a wide range of applications-and the V1.30 update is a perfect example of this. We’ve taken the most requested capabilities and turned those into new features that make the Portacapture X8 even more versatile and useful.”
@@curtisjudd “The USB MIX MINUS function can now be used in the PODCAST app. This can suppress the occurrence of echoes in audio from remote participants when capturing podcasts.”
Hi Curtis, your content is incredibly helpful, and I appreciate your detailed and thoughtful approach. I’m currently setting up for ASMR recordings and facing challenges. I use two NT1 5th gen mics with my MBP, but they’re picking up too much external noise. After watching your videos and reading your responses, I’m considering switching to a Zoom F3 with two Rode NT5 mics. What are your thoughts on this setup? Also, I’m realising that my old house, despite being on a quiet street, might not be ideal for these recordings. I’m following your editing tips and using RX, but any additional advice on improving my recording space or setup would be invaluable. Thank you so much!
As usual a very nice thoroughly explained video. But one question. if I'm recording multi track. or doing live streaming. can I send FX (like reverb) only to one specific channel? channel 1 mic, channel 2 guitar, channel 3 bass I only want to send it to the mic. is that possible?
I did not test this specifically, but I believe the answer is yes. In Manual mode, you can toggle reverb on in each channel menu. I would recommend you confirm with Tascam support to be certain.
Thank you Curtis, great review, for multitrack, can you record a guitar in the XLR and simultaneously record using the condenser mics ? Say for recording an acoustic duo with some aditional control over the guitars in post. Thanks
Dear Curtis, may I ask why did you used -23 LUFS for this test? Is it because european standar or because the device? Why not -19 LUFS? Could you make deeper video about this X8, please? I bought it last month, but still configuring all features and how I could use them properly according to the situation. i really like this tascam. Thank u
Hi Herman. Good question. I normalized the audio to -23 LUFS because I could do that without applying a limiter or compressor or any other processing to the file to reach that loudness target. That just happens to be the same target used for TV broadcast in Europe.
Hey Curtis lovely review as usual. I have always wanted to capture ambient sound for my videos in my rides. This fits the bill. And please re edit your pros you have repeated removable XY mic twice (unless I want to put it back on and remove it again to see it’s pros 😅)
I was looking to upgrade from my H4N Pro and I love the user interface of the X8 but the preamps seem no better for double the money so it's looking like the F6.
thank you for this video.. I've got a h4n and a babyface pro.. i'm thinking of trading it all in for this or the F6.. what would you recommend ? Seems like the F6 is a better device ( I have xlr mics ), but having built in mics seems to add a lot of portability...
Love the review, as usual it is simple and accurate. My take on the WS-11 “Dead Cat” is that it wasn’t very good really (much better than nothing though). Bubblebee do one which is significantly better.
It’s a tad bit disappointing that the X8 has so many issues from what I’ve seen, especially for $500. Luckily for me, I found a Mixpre 3 II for $500 and returned this unit. Hoping that Tascam learns from their mistakes.
The review did not list a lot of issues, neither have other professional reviews. I am not sure what you are referring to. Also, Sound Devices recorders are one of the best, no doubt, but they cost a lot more than this device and they are nowhere near as easy to use.
@@curtisjudd Ah ok, so there are no actual problems with the device, everything is working as intended... It just depends on the scenario if it's the right tool to use? Because the comment sounded like there are actual mistakes and issues...
Thanks Curtis! Would you recommend this portacapture over the Zoom F4 for field recording work? Does the 32 bit float offer any substantial upgrades in that department?
Hi Curtis, I'm on the market for a new field recorder. Do you think this one would be the best? My Zoom H6 packed in and I'm having trouble getting it repaired. Super vid here as always. I kinda knew the build of this would be a bit plastic.
super useful review, would u recommend it based on sound quality preamps over the dr60 and the dr70 along to my deity smic 2s, just cause they're quite old recorders they seem to be more professional product idk
Not really, the preamps are not going to make things sound substantially better unless you are in a lot of situations where your audio clips and distorts. Then it would be worthwhile.
This video is normalized to -23 LUFS so that I didn't have to do any post processing and so you can hear how it sounds directly out of the recorder.
Is it possible to apply internal effects such as compressors and preset effects to the audio that has been recorded on this recorder?
@@OMTEKNO While it is recording, yes.
I think you've mentioned in a few videos that - 23 LUFS is broadcast standard but - 16 LUFS is often preferred for online distribution. Any chance you could expand upon this in a future video?
@@DanielSRosehill Yes, here: ruclips.net/video/nOzZKEWJ5wk/видео.html
Which one has better preamps, the Tascam DR100 MKIII or the Portacapture X8?
Great coverage, Curtis! Thanks.
Thanks Gerald!
Curtis I appreciate this. Here are some things I like (in no particular order)
1.) The notes at the beginning. Specifically the timing of them, like you understand that I can pause it if I need to which is great.
2.) Colors, I watch these at night sometimes and you keep the colors....gentle on my eyes
3.) You're cadence and voice. It's accurate, paced properly, clear, concise, relevant, and human.
4.) The info. You give us exactly what we need to know.
5.) Kindness. I see you pop up on other channels to comment sometimes and it's always kind, supportive, and makes me happy.
6.) Honesty honesty honesty. You tell it like it is.
7.) Have a great day man. Thanks for doing what you do. We random humans are ACTUAL humans that ACTUALLY appreciate you! Haha be well.
Thanks Geodesic Interpolation!
PS - Do you so some sort of cartography or Geosciences work? Curious based on the name...
Man! Did you have to say it all? You stole all of my thoughts. I've been learning from Curtis since 2018. Much love Sir, you've helped me greatly.
On 32 bit Float…I don’t know about anyone else, but I never thought I’d see the day when you could record something with clipping or really low and still be able to adjust to make it sound good. Blows my mind.
👍
Bought a Tascam Portacapture X8 on the strength of this clear and comprehensive review! Thanks, Curtis.
Happy recording!
Easily the best review I've seen for this product (and similar). Thanks so much!
👍
I brought it two weeks ago. I was waiting for this review. I like the interface and ease of use. It's a great piece of kit.
👍 Glad it works well for you!
im having trouble using this as an interface for Cubase. I see all the channels in the input selection but when I hit record, there's no signal. may you please explain?
@@AlternativeKava Probably best to contact Tascam support for help. Best wishes!
There are many reasons why yours is an excellent review but let me comment on one aspect. The lighting and product presentation is the best in the business. The colorful background, controlled depth of field combined with high res image and sharp focus make a very engaging video.
Thanks Allen.
I have a bunch of recorders, but the X8 is probably the one I would keep if ai had to part all but one. It is a very good concept and gives you the most versaitility. A variety of inputs, a lot of ways you can attach mics to the recorder body. You also get a lot of functionality: it is a mixing board, a DSP processor, a mobile podcast studio. It can record 24 and 32 bit simultaneously. It has control apps for both iOS and Android. As audio interface it works both 24 or 32 bit now. Very- very close to perfect for my needs. And I am happy with the audio quality as well. Having said that I also have an F3 and an F8n Pro, and a few more. The X8 stacks up nicely. There are a few things in the software that could be improved on, but recording quality is on par. The only thing I find misleading is the headphone amplifier which is quity noisy. I thought it was preamp noise, but no, the recording is clean, just there is too much hiss in the headphones.
Glad it works well for you!
Always love a new Curtis Judd video! Thanks for making these videos, really helps to find what gear to get and just fun getting knowledge on things
Thanks Kyle.
Nice! I love it! I'm addicted to taking high quality audio samples of more than just speech. I really like this channel! Subscribed. Great video!
Thanks Luke and happy recording!
Just got the X8 and really enjoying it thus far. Coming from a mixpre 6-ii, the large touchscreen and easy to navigate UI is a godsend. As Curtis points out, the flexibility/versatility is probably what is the best thing about the X8.
👍
Does it sound as good as mixpre though there preamps are amazing
I've had the DR100 MK3 for a couple years now and have not been disappointed. It has worked well even under fairly rough conditions, including heavy costal moisture in the air.
Thanks for sharing, Ernie!
Your review is by far the best and most elaborated with detailed explanation. Now waiting for your Zoom F8n Pro review and workflow because i am gonna have one next month :D
I have the F8n on pre-order so hoping to do that review soon.
As of September 2022, one advantage being seen in the touchscreen interface is the ability to revise and enhance the feature set offered. In the last year it gained solo monitoring of inputs and channels, Bluetooth timecode support, and ability to store and retrieve configurations for input dynamics as well as three customized configurations created in the manual mode or other app modes. Supposedly other stability fixes were also made in the firmware, and on release it clearly needed some. But unlike devices whose operation is heavily defined by physical control elements, the touchscreen UI allowed them to push the device out and later revise and enhance its feature set. At first it wasn't clear how much they'd do that, and perhaps they're done now, but they probably don't have to finished as room for more improvements remain.
Thanks for the update.
@@curtisjuddReally appreciate your reviews, they're kinda the go-to trusted source for me and others..
So thought this might be best place to post update.
Not so related to the touchscreen interface, but it also gained the ability to serve a 32 bit interface to the computer...
And the price currently has a $100 (20%) discount from the $500 release price.
I'm suspecting that will stick, as it seems like where this quality level product should have been from the start... Just as your reaction to the initial price reflected.
My guess is they rushed it out unpolished at a high asking price to grab the opportunity. ...The launcher wheel in the UI always had those three empty spots that were begging for a future function, Now there are three user system configs that drop into those spots on the launcher.
For sound designers, the X8's ultrasonic noise spikes in 192K mode are definitely significant! Take a recording, drop it a few octaves, and that noise will become a high-pitched audible tone. Whether you could work around that without spoiling the sample would depend on the application.
Thanks for sharing. 👍
This problem has not been fixed in the new firmwares ?
Is there an alternative product that you prefer?
20:24 You are amazing. That question was literally in my head and I was about to write that question in the comments. Great efforts, well appreciated.
🙏
Very detailed review - nice work Curtis!
Thanks David.
Does the Portacapture have Mix Minus for USB or phone inputs?
No, not that I saw in the menus. But for USB, most of the call or podcast services automatically take care of that these days.
im really waiting for this video. I have heard a lot of problems of the Portacapture X8 and I was waiting for your review to make a good decision.
I hope it was helpful.
Thanks Curtis for this review. Definitely not wasting my time or money on this device. Nice review.
Thanks Johnny.
Wow! What a great review as always. Thanks so very much!!! :D
Thanks so much!
Nice review thanks. I'm torn between the X8 and the Zoom F6 for recording rehearsals of classical music ensembles. 32 bit float is going to be a life saver so I'm sure either will be a big upgrade on a zoom h1!
I’d opt for the F6.
Hi Curtis, great review! (as always). I’m in the same situation - recording classical music (classical guitar specifically); is your preference for the Zoom F6 due to the quality of the preamps? Many Thanks.
Thanks for another great review, Mr Judd.
Thanks Nik.
You're great reviewer.... Thank you for sharing your thoughts and experiences... It's appreciated
My pleasure! Thanks!
I had a traumatic experience where I was filming an EDM festival for my first time, using the X8 to capture audio off the DJ mixer. Because I enabled pre-record for my first time, when I hit record and saw the border of the screen illuminate red and heard the inputs through my headphones I assumed it was good to go. When I went to listen back to the recording after filming all night long (New Years in Miami is wild), there was no audio captured. People need to know, this recorder must have the record button pressed twice to actually record.
👍
hahah, I love the expression when discussing the price. Thanks for another great review.
🙃
I am very glad I watched this video before purchasing. The 192khz 32 bit is not really necessary for what I do and the other pitfalls were really deal killers for me, and I went with the Zoom H8 instead for its capsules and versatility.
Happy recording!
I can't wait until you do a review of the Zoom F3. Also the F8n Pro.
Both on preorder. 👍
Do you know is the preamps in X8 and new Tascam AV-FR2 the same?
I don't know for sure. But they're pretty similar.
@@curtisjudd tnx... You are nr. 1 👍♥️
well, at the rist of making these comments seem repetitive, thank you for the wonderful video Curtis! An amazing review of a pretty unique product!
Thanks Isaac.
Excellent review, thanks for the attention to detail.
👍
14:02 dang it! i really want the 32 bit for recording my synths!
That'd be neat.
Thank you for mentioning the hum above 20kHz in the higher sample rate recordings. I was so excited about this recorder but going off the reviews it's just got too many issues to make me confident in buying it.
Yes, I wouldn't have noticed it since I do not usually record at 192kHz so we have to credit several audiophiles for pointing that out. I'm not sure why hum above 20kHz is a practical concern, but thought it should be mentioned.
@@curtisjudd the concern is more for sound design purposes. When you record in the ultrasonic range you need to re-pitch those sounds to bring them into the human hearing range. So the hum on the X8 at 25kHz (even dropped by one octave) would become about 12.5kHz, well within human hearing.
@@WilliamMorrisMusic fair point and I stand - happily - corrected. Thank you.
@@curtisjudd you're very welcome good sir. It is probably one of the more niche uses for the recorder, for a lot of users it won't be an issue at all.
Nice in depth review as always! Side note, love the edit at 18:03 😆
🙏🙃
feels like its in a weird spot with the F6 a little above with better pre amps, more xlr inputs ect and the F3 below if you just need 2 channels of 32bit float
but I don't see what tascam could do here.
I'd suggest they find a way to make better preamps for this unit with wider dynamic range. That'd make it a lot more compelling.
great video thanks! I've just bought the X8 and have a shoot coming up where they plan to use Tentacle Sync and send me audio timecode to sync up later in post. How do I mute the timecode monitor channel so I don't have it coming through the headphones?
Very much appreciate you taking a look at this. Some of your comments make me think that they only used a single A/D converter instead of using 2 to get a wider dynamic range. Of course, with previous Tascam recorders, the safety track option extends the dynamic range by 12dB, which can be handy in situations where this is needed. Personally, I'm most disappointed by the battery life. If you got about 4 hours with lithium batteries, that would suggest NiMH batteries would only get about 2 to 2.5 hours. This makes it a no-go for me, as I tend to use these types of recorders out in nature to get ambient recordings. My money would be better spent on a set of dedicated stereo mics to go with either my Tascam DR-44wl or DR-680mkII. (Something I have been considering, although not as convenient. Handling noise is another area of disappointment, especially since these devices are supposedly made to be held while recording.
Indeed exactly as i am thinking. Their stated Dynamic Range is only 112 dB ( Left completely out of public view for specifications and had to get through email contact with the engineering department )
For Reference these two other 32 Bit Float Recorders Zoom F6 has 132 dB Dynamic Range
Sound Devices Mix Pre 3 ii Series Dynamic Range is 142 dB.
So at 20 dB Dynamic Range Headroom Missing compared to a Zoom F6 and 30 dB ! vs Sound Devices Mix Pre ii... That's a whole LOT of missing Headroom!
So where and how did Tascam Engineers Fail at this and huge amount of missing Dynamic Range especially for 32Bit Float
@@BushMasterThermal likely in the analogue preamps.
Thanks Alan. The safety track recording feature increases headroom but not overall dynamic range. I believe that they used multiple converters per input, but the relatively lower dynamic range of this device vs. the Sound Devices MixPre II series is likely due to poorer quality analogue preamplifiers.
@@curtisjudd It's possible I misunderstood your comments regarding the dynamic range available, so I guess I'll watch for a comparison between this and another Tascam device to see if there's any advantage here in that regard. Regarding combining tracks to increase dynamic range, this requires special post processing and setting levels to put the louder portions of the track into the safety track (thus reducing the headroom normally reserved as a safety), but it can be done.
@@alantuttphotography Yes, understood. Note that with the safety track recording, it is potentially a bit of a compromise because on the track recorded at -12dB, the noise floor is potentially closer to the sound source, or at best, the noise floor is different and so the job of blending that can be somewhat complex. It really depends on how they implement the safety track recording feature. If they're just using a pad, it may not sound the same as if they actually used a second preamplifier with 12 dB less gain applied (like on the ZOOM F series recorders).
I purchased this recorder to replace the Zoom H8 because of the following reasons:
1. The Zoom H8 has a micro-USB connector which is irritating. The X8 has a USB-C connector which is MUCH more convenient.
2. The Tascam X8 has 32 bit float recording.
3. The X8's touchscreen is far superior to the H8's touchscreen - it's not even close.
4. The X8 is far more intuitive to use.
5. Recording music on the X8 with effects like reverb is easier and it is well laid out in the app. For amateurs like me, recording my original songs on the Tascam X8 is FAR easier than the Zoom H8. With the Zoom H8, often it would not start recording when I hit the record button twice, and it was hard to see on the touchscreen to monitor what was going on. On the X8, this has not been a problem. The entire record process for music using music app or recording without the app is streamlined and laid out far better with the Tascam X8. For people new to audio recording, this is extremely helpful.
6. The recording quality of the X8 appears to be at least equal to the H8. The Tascam X8 recordings of my original songs generally sound better than those I made on the Zoom H8. I am a skilled musician and songwriter and I CAN hear the difference. I am not sure why they sound better, but they do. Without effects, the difference is not world shaking, but with effects, it is night and day. The Tascam allows amateurs to easily add effects in the music app.
7. You can control every function of the X8 from an android phone remotely via the Bluetooth dongle. On the Zoom H8, you cannot control every function and their remote dongle only works with IOS (Apple) phones or tablets. The remote function on the H8 only lets you monitor the recordings and you cannot adjust the settings remotely. Every review of the Bluetooth remote control of the X8 has said it works very well with no delay.
8. I don't have a need to record in 192 kHz. Plus to do so would require expensive microphones. One professional reviewer mentioned that not many mics have the ability to record in that high sample rate range. I will take their word for it. Having said that, the 192 kHz feature is available on the X8, but the H8 does not have this feature at all.
9. The cost is fairly equal. The X8 is about a $100.00 more.
Thanks for your thorough review - it was excellent.
I have two questions. Do you think there is a hearable difference between the Zoom F6 or other higher level recorder (from any manufacturer) and the Tascam X8 for music and song recording, when recorded at 44 kHz, 48 kHz and 96 kHz? If there would be a difference that is audible, what prosumer audio recorder would you recommend in the price range up to $2,000.00?
Thanks,
Frank Long
Thanks for sharing, Frank. I haven't found sample rates to make a big difference unless you are doing sound design work and plan to slow the sound down for sound effects. However, the 32-bit float can make a practical difference if you happen to set your gain incorrectly. So the difference between the Zoom F6 and the X8 is largely going to be dynamic range in 32-bit float mode. If you're recording REALLY loud music and you have a high quality microphone which can handle high SPLs (e.g., >130dB SPL) then the 32-bit float on the F6 is going to be a safer bet. But if you set your gain appropriately, you can make fine recordings with the X8.
@@curtisjudd Thanks, your advice is very helpful. I feel a little bit like I am in a dark room and I am trying to "feel" my way through to the light when it comes to sound recording. There is a big learning curve to understanding both audio and video recording.
This was very helpful, thank you Curtis
👍
Would love to see a comparison against the zoom fx3 when avail.
I'll definitely review the F3 once I receive my copy. We'll talk about how it compares to various other 32-bit float capable recorders.
Thanks for this review, Curtis. I wonder, is 32 bit float available if you record a podcast with 3 or 4 people? I ask, because I read somewhere, that 32 bit float is not available in the Podcast settings.
I've heard the same thing. I was wondering if recording in manual mode would be the solution for instead of the default "podcast" settings.
Plus I suppose Curtis would say it shouldn't be a sweat since its just talking heads that would be recorded.
I'm not positive as I didn't test this specific scenario. Probably best to contact TASCAM support to confirm.
Podcast recording app disappoints on this: It's 24bit 48khz recording exclusively.
Much worse...
If you have recording settings at 32bit float, and open up the podcast app, it bumps the device setup into 24b/48k, affecting all subsequent recording.
So you need to go back into the devices record settings and reset them after opening the podcast app.
Exploring the device after getting it...I was puzzled about how things kept getting reset. A thorough read of the manual told me the podcast app was exclusively 24b/48k, and examination showed it was undoing previous settings across all recording.
Great video, clear and concise, thanks and just subscribed 👍
👍
Awesome. Now Tascam and Zoom are on the same pace 😍. I really like the design of TASCAM Portacapture X8. The UI is absolutely simple yet futuristic.
I do like the UI quite a bit more on the X8 vs. the ZOOM H8 and H6.
Formating the disk is VERY IMPORTANT - Thanks
Indeed.
Good job as usual. Seems to me that 32 bit is best as a single operator tool when you cannot mind the camera and and lighting and worry about things like Make up and what the talent is warning and the set and constantly monitor audio levels at the same time.
Yes, or when recording extremely dynamic sound effects.
Thank you for a great review! You mention other recorders you have tested with lower self noise than the X8. Can't stretch to Sound Devices prices right now but if you have any thoughts on low self noise portable field recorders that would be really appreciated. I am considering a Zoom F3 to replace my H4N.
The ZOOM F3 would be a fantastic choice overall and definitely with lower self-noise.
Was that Irish music at the start Curtis? Great video as always!
Yes! Out on the Ocean.
I've been looking at the Zoom H recorders for a few years now and couldn't get my head around the fact that they still don't use USB C. So bought this immediately (can't use your links for EU), but did subscribe :-)
Happy recording!
Great review and demo but I think I'll stick with my Zoom H6, F8N and H3VR. I also use a Tascam 680 & 680 mk2, a DR-60D mkII, a DR-70D and a HDP2 so am familiar with both Zoom and Teac-Tascam units and have found both positives and negatives over time with both companies products. Lately I have found that the Zoom products seem just slightly better for my needs but I respect and use devices from both. Your reviews have helped me come to purchase decisions and kept me informed of the new products as they come available.
Thanks Chris. Happy recording!
I just bought the zoom H6. its ooooooold tech and very limiting as a multitrack, returning it asap, unfortunately. nice as a simple mic though.
Very interesting video. Thanks. Will you be doing a review (and comparison) of the Zoom F3??
Yes, definitely planning to review the F3 once I get my copy.
Excellent review and tips. Mine just came so I can record quality audio and use in tracks later on.
👍 Happy recording!
I have a number of both Tascam and Zoom recorders in my studio and remote equipment collection and I recently added the Zoom H8 to my larder. What tipped the scales in it's favour was it's ability to record 10 XLR microphone sources at the same time (with the 4 mic adaptor). Nothing against Tascam as I have loved their equipment over the years (especially the 680 series) but currently Zoom has generally been a few steps ahead of Tascam in sound quality (I prefer the Zoom sound over the current Tascam sound) and function while bringing upgrades to market at a reasonable price. My favourite Zoom is still my F8N but the H8 is a great portable handheld option especially with the extra microphone inputs. The H8 also has the advantage of allowing me to use all the adaptors that I purchased for my H6 thus saving me money for the specialty adaptors already owned. The H6 is a great backup for remotes when I don't need the extra microphones or when I need to record the same audio from multiple perspectives beyond ten microphones. An example being recording fireworks from two locations without wanting to run extended cabling from one recording to distant wired microphones. Although another option was to run wireless microphones and receive at a single recorder.
👍
Thank you for the review.. Now waiting for Zoom H6-II with 32 bit float, USB-C connection and faster bootup. For now, the Zoom H5 continues to be budget convenience king (along with F4 for more 'pro' work)
You're welcome. Happy recording!
Agree, I got the XLR-module for my H5. I can use it for lavs that do not require phantom power. With backup recording it will protect from clipping in most situations. The XLR inputs I use for boom mics. In a dialogue or interview setup it will give you three recordings of the same source, plenty to work with. The signal from the boom mic needs to be pretty hot, like Rode NTG5. Using the optional remote, removes handling noises. Adjusting gain is out with the remote but you can start, stop the recording and playback.
In addition, the H5 takes full size SD cards. microSDs are more fragile. Mini USBs are sturdier than micro, also a feature of H5. Why Zoom chose microUSB for H8 is beyond reason.
Would you say that the TASCAM DR-701D's preamps are better than the X8's? And how do you rate the DR-701D preamps compared to the Zoom F6? I compared the quality of the DR-701D preamps to the Mixpre 3 and I have to say I like the DR-701D better. They sound warmer, more natural. The Mixpre 3 has a certain digital hardness in the sound. Or not?
Trust your ears. 👍 I don’t have a 701D on hand to do an A/B test.
Could not wait for your review... I'm upgrading from the DR-100MK iii
It's sad they didn't include an INTERNAL LITHIUM BATTERY like the old version...
Oh, yes, I completely forgot about that. The DR-100mkII also had that.
Buying one. Decision point 13:04 the recovery abilities are amazing.
👍
@@curtisjudd are use the affiliate link on the video. Very excited to get this. It will be replacing an old Tascam DR60D MKII.
@@GaryStockton 👍 Affiliate links are all up to date. Happy recording!
I've been waiting/hoping you would do a review of this as there are not that many quality reviews out there for this recorder. I've been seriously considering getting this unit since it was announced but there seemed to be a a lot of minor bugs with it and I couldn't decide between this and the Sony PCM-D10. The Sony interface isn't as fancy as the Tascam but Sonys just seem to work. Thanks for the review.
You're welcome and happy recording to you!
Thank you so much for the excellent review; I've been waiting for your take on this unit. The X8 looks really interesting for many use cases, but I'm left wishing Tascam put the R&D into different areas. Personally, I'd rather have something like a Zoom H5 (smaller, more physical controls) but with improved preamps and headphone amp rather than 32bit recording and a big screen with lots of presets. The X8 looks like it might be a super versatile and popular device after a few minor revisions to fix it's early issues, but I'm left wondering if a Centrance Mixerface (top of my budget :-) might be a better option for my uses. Or maybe Zoom will upgrade the H5 with improved preamps :-) hope springs eternal! Anyway, thank you again so much for your excellent channel and review.
Thanks Don. I think it largely depends on what you record. 32-bit float on the Tascam for spoken word recording is quite good.
My ideal recorder at this form factor would be the H6 but with locking xlr inputs, locking faders, better preamps, better headphone amp and a quieter stereo mic. That's a lot I know but competitors offer all of that. What I like about the H6 is actually it's interface. Easy to control faders on the fly. Easy to arm/solo any track in the click of a button. The essentials are right in front of you and don't require a screen and menu to navigate.
part of me thinks it's interesting that it has basically an android phone built in... but a bigger part of me wishes these things were just hard knobs and switches. I cant stand dealing with touch screen in the field.
Dear Patrick, I think we could all benefit from more analogue controls. And we could all benefit from some of the food you photograph as well. I hope some day to share a meal with you. 🙏
@@curtisjudd yes! 🍝
I was waiting for your review. I ordered it anyway for the 32bit and UI has great options. I say it's real weakness is it's main selling factor is the screen breaking also expensive. I don't have a high quality audio solution I had the DR 60 that I loved but this device covers alot of ground fast with presets. Thanks
Happy recording!
Having a really hard time attempting to use the X8 as an interface with Audition (in multi track), no matter what settings on the computer or tascam, no audio is displayed when the track is armed and record is pressed.
Perhaps a video demonstrating exactly how to make it happen is useful since no one has one.
I'd like to do that, but I had this on loan for a month to make the review and I no longer have it.
Thanks, Curtis. This helps. I’m having a little analysis paralysis and can’t decide which way to go. I really only need 4 inputs for mics. How does this stack up to Zoom’s offerings in August 2023?
If battery life is top priority, I’d go ZOOM. Otherwise, I’d go with the X8.
@@curtisjudd Thank you. Do you recommend the MicTrak?
@@schumcreative Haven't used it, unfortunately.
Hi Curtis...thanks for your unbiased videos. You channel is real gold.
If I may ask you. Does the 32bit float allow more agreesive post processing? I am wondering if I could think about it like recording 12 bit raw video which handle way more editing that other compressed format?? Thanks
Potentially, yes. You end up with potentially more dynamic range.
@@curtisjudd thanks 😊
The reverb on the Tascam is still #1
Nice for musicians.
@@curtisjudd Very nice - plus 2 condenser microphones - set apart to create a stereo delay - very amazing
is this the best field recorder in terms of internal mics for ambient noise?
Not sure whether it is the best, but it is pretty good.
Nice Video! Does Tascam plan to add more of the apps on the recorder? Or are the preinstalled the final ones? Any plans to try the AK-BT1 bluetooth remote control dongle too?
I don't know what Tascam plans to add. I am only borrowing this unit so I have not plans to add the bluetooth module.
Curtis congrats in another piece of review! One question I’m between F6 and X8, I’ve noticed you told somebody in the comments that you prefer F6. Anything in particular for this advice? The preamps? Build quality? Form factor? Sound? I’m very interested in the float 32 recording.
Yes, build quality and preamp quality.
@@curtisjudd excellent, got it. Stay with the F6 for buying. Thanks again Curtis!😀🙌
Thank you for a comprehensive review Curtis. Not exactly related to the content, but will you please share the identity of the mounting plate you used, seen at about 15:13 in the video? Looks like a nice, large, accessible 1/4-20 thumb wheel within a frame that might also include additional attachment points for a battery tray or other useful accessories.
Thanks again,
- James
Audial Delta LLC
Manassas, VA
Hi James, yes, that's the Sound Devices Pix-base stand and I put a link for it in the description.
Curtis , you are our audio King , thank you so much for explaining everything so thoroughly to us mere mortals!! I can’t make a single audio related purchase without checking out your opinions first!
Let me ask you one thing my friend… I do a lot of video work with doctors, dentists and etc for social media… been using lavalier mics but wanted to step up my game , so I picked up a mkh 416 this week… would you say that this tascam would be a good combination with it?? I would use mostly for spoken word…
Thank you so much my friend
Yes, that should work nicely.
Hi Curtis! Great video as always. Do I understand correctly at 13:54 that the Zoom F3 does have better pre-amps than this Tascam? (and therefore will get more out of the 32bit float with decent microphones). This Portacapture has a lot more features, the nice screen, the included mics etc, but I think I'd do with the bare bones F3. It's also cheaper, and if it does sound better I think that would make the F3 a no-brainer for me.
Hi Roger, no, I haven't tested the F3 yet, still waiting for my copy to arrive. However, if they use the same preamps as the F6, then yes, they'll surely have more dynamic range than the X8. I wouldn't say that they sound better, just to be precise.
@@curtisjudd fair enough, and thanks for the answer!
I like how you included a bit of musical use for this recorder Curtis. I won't be a buyer for this new Tascam recorder but it's a good trend to see 32 bit float recording now available in these consumer type recorders with onboard mic capsules. I use and love the Zoom F6 these days and have the H6 in my bag as backup when I'm recording my concerts. Thanks for the great video again!
🙏
Good choice! I have the same two recorders (and the F8n but will soon upgrade to F8n pro)
Great channel! Keep it goin please 🙏🏼🙏🏼
👍
Announced today: “With the introduction of the V1.30 firmware update, the Portacapture X8 now has the capability to use 32-bit float point resolution when using the unit as a USB audio interface to a DAW (Digital Audio Workstation). This facilitates wider dynamic range, higher resolution, and greater audio quality for better overall record quality. The 32-bit float technology enables audio to be dynamically controlled and edited virtually without limitations. Clipped audio segments can easily be corrected and, similarly, low level audio passages can be adjusted to a higher dB level.
Paul Youngblood, Director of Product Marketing at TASCAM, commented on the new features offered by the V1.30 firmware update, “The Portacapture X8 has proven itself to be a full-featured, powerful handheld recorder both on its own or when used in tandem with a computer. As a company, we strive to listen carefully to our users, as this enables us to learn first-hand how our equipment gets used in a wide range of applications-and the V1.30 update is a perfect example of this. We’ve taken the most requested capabilities and turned those into new features that make the Portacapture X8 even more versatile and useful.”
Very nice, thanks for sharing 👍
@@curtisjudd “The USB MIX MINUS function can now be used in the PODCAST app.
This can suppress the occurrence of echoes in audio from remote participants when capturing podcasts.”
Hi Curtis, Are you planning on doing a video on the new Zoom F8n Pro? Thanks for the the great information! I love your channel.
Yes, definitely.
Hi Curtis, your content is incredibly helpful, and I appreciate your detailed and thoughtful approach. I’m currently setting up for ASMR recordings and facing challenges. I use two NT1 5th gen mics with my MBP, but they’re picking up too much external noise. After watching your videos and reading your responses, I’m considering switching to a Zoom F3 with two Rode NT5 mics. What are your thoughts on this setup?
Also, I’m realising that my old house, despite being on a quiet street, might not be ideal for these recordings. I’m following your editing tips and using RX, but any additional advice on improving my recording space or setup would be invaluable. Thank you so much!
Sound blankets and placing the mic as close as reasonably possible are my two biggest tips.
As usual a very nice thoroughly explained video.
But one question.
if I'm recording multi track. or doing live streaming.
can I send FX (like reverb) only to one specific channel?
channel 1 mic, channel 2 guitar, channel 3 bass
I only want to send it to the mic. is that possible?
I did not test this specifically, but I believe the answer is yes. In Manual mode, you can toggle reverb on in each channel menu. I would recommend you confirm with Tascam support to be certain.
Thank you Curtis, great review, for multitrack, can you record a guitar in the XLR and simultaneously record using the condenser mics ? Say for recording an acoustic duo with some aditional control over the guitars in post. Thanks
Yes
@@curtisjudd Many thanks 👍🏻
Dear Curtis, may I ask why did you used -23 LUFS for this test? Is it because european standar or because the device? Why not -19 LUFS? Could you make deeper video about this X8, please? I bought it last month, but still configuring all features and how I could use them properly according to the situation. i really like this tascam. Thank u
Hi Herman. Good question. I normalized the audio to -23 LUFS because I could do that without applying a limiter or compressor or any other processing to the file to reach that loudness target. That just happens to be the same target used for TV broadcast in Europe.
Hey Curtis! What microphone did you use in the practical noise floor test? A condenser mic? Thanks!
I have the RODE NT1 listed in the description so I think that was the mic. (It’s been a few years)
@@curtisjudd Oh, that would make a lot of sense to use pretty much the lowest self noise condenser mic on the market for a test like that, thanks!
Hey Curtis lovely review as usual. I have always wanted to capture ambient sound for my videos in my rides. This fits the bill. And please re edit your pros you have repeated removable XY mic twice (unless I want to put it back on and remove it again to see it’s pros 😅)
Thanks and happy riding to you!
I,m a acoustic musician,should i go for the tascam x8
or zoom f6.greetings from the Netherlands.
I'd personally opt for the F6.
Great vid! What do you think abt X6 tho? Same thing?
Yes, appears to be the same except fewer inputs and tops out at 96kHz sample rates.
@@curtisjudd thx! Look fwd to ur review, if u plan to do so. I m torn between that and zoom F6.
I really wish that ZOOM could release the new H6n with 32bit/192khz in the same form factor as current H6
Well, they may have more motivation to do that now. 😀
Looks grate. I will think upgrade my XR40 to one of this. :)
Happy recording!
I was looking to upgrade from my H4N Pro and I love the user interface of the X8 but the preamps seem no better for double the money so it's looking like the F6.
👍
The 1/8 plugs on the built in mics appear to have 3 conductors as if stereo. I wonder why? Great review.
Maybe they’re planning some additional microphone capsules?
thank you for this video.. I've got a h4n and a babyface pro.. i'm thinking of trading it all in for this or the F6.. what would you recommend ? Seems like the F6 is a better device ( I have xlr mics ), but having built in mics seems to add a lot of portability...
Personally, I'd opt for the F6. But if you need built-in mics, the X8 is a decent option.
You should do a review of the zoom m4 field recorder! It’s also 32 bit float with 2 xlr inputs
Cool, thanks for the suggestion.
Love the review, as usual it is simple and accurate. My take on the WS-11 “Dead Cat” is that it wasn’t very good really (much better than nothing though). Bubblebee do one which is significantly better.
👍
It’s a tad bit disappointing that the X8 has so many issues from what I’ve seen, especially for $500. Luckily for me, I found a Mixpre 3 II for $500 and returned this unit. Hoping that Tascam learns from their mistakes.
Yes, I do hope so.
The review did not list a lot of issues, neither have other professional reviews. I am not sure what you are referring to. Also, Sound Devices recorders are one of the best, no doubt, but they cost a lot more than this device and they are nowhere near as easy to use.
Same here. I didn't see any issues in this review. What issues are there?
@@lukastemberger I did list some "cons" but whether those are issues depend on the situation in which the recorder is used.
@@curtisjudd Ah ok, so there are no actual problems with the device, everything is working as intended... It just depends on the scenario if it's the right tool to use?
Because the comment sounded like there are actual mistakes and issues...
Thanks Curtis! Would you recommend this portacapture over the Zoom F4 for field recording work? Does the 32 bit float offer any substantial upgrades in that department?
I'd personally opt for the F4.
@@curtisjudd Thank you for helping with this key advice :)
Portacapture X6? Any improvements?
My understanding is that it’s the same with fewer inputs.
There are slight differences in dynamic range and Mic amp EIN in favor of X8
do you think the x8 would work with a rode ntg3? or is the tascam av2 oder zoom f3 better?
Yes, they'd all work well with an NTG3.
did you measure the voltage provided to the built-in electrets? perhaps the capsules could be upgraded with some quieter capsules
I didn't. Sorry about that.
Wondering if the Portacapture X8 will allow me to playback my guitar parts using headphones while also recording vocals on the device.
Not when I tested it, but perhaps they added that since this review.
Hi Curtis, I'm on the market for a new field recorder. Do you think this one would be the best? My Zoom H6 packed in and I'm having trouble getting it repaired. Super vid here as always. I kinda knew the build of this would be a bit plastic.
It’s ok. Battery life isn’t as good as the ZOOM recorders, build isn’t amazing. I’d actually choose the ZOOM F3 or F6 for my work.
Thank you for this review!!
👍
Great review! It’s nice to learn about this device but it’s a little pricey considering it’s limitations. Glad I’ve got the F6!
👍 Happy recording!
super useful review, would u recommend it based on sound quality preamps over the dr60 and the dr70 along to my deity smic 2s, just cause they're quite old recorders they seem to be more professional product idk
Not really, the preamps are not going to make things sound substantially better unless you are in a lot of situations where your audio clips and distorts. Then it would be worthwhile.