@Foaad Hisham still lasted ridiculously long without being rereleased is the thing. There have been no new additions to the game series. Unlike elder scrolls where they made elder scrolls online fir example.
it's nice to come full circle on a generation, nearly 7 years ago we were about to get a watered down version of a game that would come back stronger than ever in a year on the next gen, and then PC would take it further. We're a bit further out from RDR2 at this point, but it will be great to see what they deliver for next-gen in terms of "upgrades" or patches for next-gen, not to mention whenever GTAVI comes out, it will have essentially skipped a generation, since GTAV was a previous generation game first.
@@siphobrisloks8133 I‘m saying that it’s not as simple as people think, even when Gta 5 launched people did indeed care about fps, and they always will and have almost always did
I never looked at specs or cared about fps back when the PS3 released. I just assumed this is how games ran and some are better then others. I just played games because I liked playing games. This is the first year I've ever seen any specs for consoles and ever seen them advertised as a selling point. I miss the days were I bought a console for new games and to play with my friends and my brother instead of getting all worked up over which specs are better and if HDMI 2.1 runs at full bandwidth or not and what resolution and refresh rate the console runs games it. I love but also hate knowing and learning about all this technical stuff. Miss the simpler days being oblivious to it all.
All games on Playstation are a cinematic experience. Uncharted, the last of Us, God of War... All the cinematic narrative experience in outstanding 24fps
@wes but with worst performance, Halo 4 is the most demanding Xbox 360 exclusive game and never drops below 28 FPS, even at split screen and multiplayer, and Gears Of War 3 too, while The Last Of Us just some times are at 30 FPS because the game runs more like 27-20 FPS, but with the motion blur looks more like 40-30 FPS, is not unplayable, but is not a big ideal
@@molininicolas Well the ps3 had a harder processor to make games for but technically on paper was better one thing the Xbox 360 had over ps3 was shared ram unlike ps3 having only 256mb for system and 256mb for games, aswell ps3 has bluray unlike the xbox's DVD, so games that were coded mainly for the ps3 like the last of us, etc look better than most xbox 360 games that's because they have mastered how to use the hardware, unlike other developers who had a harder time, but ps3 has faster loading times on a lot of games compared to 360, but both consoles are good, the 360 is impressive for what it did
@@obamascock2169 technically, the xbox 360 also had a faster gpu than the ps3, but the ps3 had a faster processor so basically one was better for graphics while the other was better for processing
You know..? Bad as these seem on paper with their really low framerates, I actually found the experience quite enjoyable on Xbox 360 at the time. The game being third person definitely helped though. Only weird thing I noticed was that occasionally, the entire game would just hang up for a second or two, then go back to normal. Probably some kind of VRAM issue on the old consoles. Either way, they did a great job getting them to even function on 360/PS3.
@@TrashWoodBand OH I get what you mean now. No, I didn't install it if I remember correctly. Just the install disc. It was really weird because I remember none of my friends having that problem at the time and it didn't happen in any other games. I dunno, weird.
@@XtremeConditions I wonder if the problem is a bad hard drive? I have a similar stutter on my PC. The physical RAM starts to fill up, so GTA V uses the hard drive to store virtual RAM. Then I think the game stutters, because it is trying to load its content and store virtual RAM at the same time. I can see the HDD indicator lit solid. My PC is older, but i don't think it would cause stutter. I wonder if your Xbox 360 has a bad hard drive that can't handle GTA V.
@@torkicks2670I've been playing on 360 for a while now and gta 5 runs perfectly I dont get why framerate is so important, it isnt even noticable, if runs smooth
The input lag becomes more unoticeable when using a Joystick like PS3's. But when you specifically use a mouse, your brain expects action to occur as fast as you move the mouse, turning you more aware of the FPS limit.
I remember playing this and I never thought or cared about the framerate. Same with GTA 4, I used to think it was just lag and that it’ll fix itself. Crazy how bad they ran.
Ps3 gamers played this game and they were happy... xbox 360 gamers did the same and they were happy... so who the fuck cares about which one is better? And pc gamers... wtf are you doing here? It's just a frame rate comparison between ps3 and xbox 360! WE ALL KNOW that pc has the best framerate, graphic, resolution, ecc. but please, STOP IT!
Tantum Gladis 'Sides, this so-called "master race" joke is immature and outright condescending anyway. There's good-natured banter, and then there's this.
Tantum Gladis I'm here to compare them. I mean I'm a PC gamer but I used to own it on the PS3 and like to see which one holds up compared to the other. I've played with some crazy intense moments online where the frame rate gets probably as low as 10. But that's with players and cops everywhere inside giant fire fights. I've never played the 360 version personally so I need to know which one holds up better! That's why I'm here.
Wow I didn't realize it was like this back then, I loved the 360 version. I just barely got the PC version and it's amazing how modern it still is. Very impressive it ran on that old hardware even in the state it did.
@@El-Duderino-His-Dudeness I was perfectly fine with it at the time. I also want to reiterate my previous comment. You have to understand that was hardware released in 05!
@@El-Duderino-His-Dudeness Actually it's very playable, you just need a short time to get used to it then you could basically play the whole game in 24fps and be fine. Not ideal at all (I run my games at 100+fps now lol), but just barely good enough.
@@El-Duderino-His-DudenessPC masterrace 60 FPS gamers should tone down when it comes to consoles. Look at shitty Switch hardware struggles to run BOTW and TOTK and see how general public perceived it. For many casuals, 25 FPS and above is already playable as long as it could maintain frame pacing.
Yeah, This was relatively stable compared to CP77. There's a huge difference with having a FPS that's stable (27-30 FPS range) compared to CP77's (15-30 FPS).
Yeah I came here actually to remind myself that gtav did run like shit on its launch consoles before reminding people about that without facts. Gtav had committed development for 2 consoles, and it runs like shit. It’s a demanding game for those consoles. Cyberpunk wasn’t committed to just 2 consoles, but 9 versions, and it runs like shit on 2 of them. Mainly because they didn’t put enough care into those base console versions and launched too early.
Till this day, I’m still incredibly impressed by the fact that GTA V was able to run in those machines. I was blown away when I first played it, seeing how much Rockstar was able to squeeze out from the machines that has so little power compared to PCs and even the Wii U. It was a massive leap from GTA IV and even Red Dead Redemption, and while it looks poor when compared to the PC version and the Xbox One/PS4 version, it’s still one of the best looking games to ever run on the 360 and PS3.
Wii U, actually in raw gpu power it was a bit weaker than the 360... perhaps a little stronger than the PS3. What the Wii U had over them was a LOT more ram. If you want to know where Nintendo goes shopping, look at the gpu bin e-waste at a recycling centre, where you can buy 10 year old tech for pennies on the dollar. Even with the Switch Nvidia was almost giving it away as Tegra was a giant flop elsewhere.
That because the explosion thing and all around texture is work with the strong processor Cell processor on ps3 is really powerfull than xbox 360 But when comes to graphical power xbox 360 win
@@ansem383 yeah my pc run gta v at 10 fps because im poor and i live in ecuador jeje xd hablo español y soy tercermundista y peleo con gringos en los comentarios de youtube
I remember when this came out lol. I was a broke college kid and the day of launch i literally stuffed my backpack with about 10-15 of my games on my 360 and walked to gamestop about a mile from my school on lunch break. I had maybe 10 bucks in my wallet and I traded in what I had to to make the difference. Zero regrets.
I bought it on 2013 and played until 2015. Fps was too low man, it was hard to play. It's just your nostalgia who speak. I remember fps was so low that i thought my console was broken.
Dyms roro Dude i'm on ps4 and even i can't deny how terrible these sony ponies are go on any gaming vid about consoles and the comments will be asshat sony fanboys talking crap about xbox.
9 лет назад+2
Christian Jordan you forgot apple fanboys(not gaming fanboys, but fanboys anyway) they are the worst kind of fanboys
Super impressive work by Rockstar on PS3 here, especially after how terrible GTA IV ran on the console. And streaming half the content from the BluRay disc and half from the HDD to double the transfer rate... just great engineering.
@@untildePoor optimisation with terrible port. Although dxvk helps it a lot and with Riva tuner FPS cap to 60, game is very smooth and to be fair... I like it's look more then GTA 5. Not to mention the story.
First time tried running GTA IV on my laptop it got loud and hot so fast, all the while running like crap. I was legit worried about the heat in particular. I play GTAV regularly and it's night and day. To this day I haven't been able get an hour into IV.
Yeah I remember trying it on PC, had to reduce the quality a lot at the time. I wonder what happened to the engine in GTA IV vs other versions? Seems like they dropped the ball.@@Light-Rock97
Its shocking to think that GTA V ran on these 2005/2007 machines. Those were simpler times, were just happy playing GTA at 20fps, crazy, were getting old buddies
i just watched this and fifa 14 and they are the same thing. hilarious they even make comparisons between xbox 360 and ps3. These consoles were made to play games both equally. No one is better than the other. A real comparison would be ps3 vs ps4 and xbox 360 vs xbox one.
I see what you're getting at. When you're getting a sub 30 FPS experience, the 2-4 FPS difference, even if it hits 30 for a millisecond doesn't make a damn difference in the world. Graphics don't matter if going high speed in a car makes you want to tear out yer fucken eyeballs. :P
h7opolo I used to play it on xbox 360 it would stutter but it was pretty playable they do something with consoles that makes shitty framrates fun an playable. But yeah I played it on pc and would get like 80 on high pretty tight. I got this laptop for college and it's pretty cheap but it's got a 960m and ok other specs
There's nothing wrong with console. Its cheap and in middle or high school its all anyone has so yeah and the graphics aren't that bad and its playable but I guess I like how smooth the pc version is
I hate how people in the "Console wars" base it off of their own personal prejudices...Seriously...same ass gameplay, very very minute ass differences...doesn't matter...Its all about your preferences...Do you have a lot of money, or a little? Are you going to be using your device for reasons other than gaming, or not? Is it just you who games in your home, or do multiple people game...asking yourself these questions will determine which one is right for you, but to make petty ass fights for no reason (like children) truly baffles me... (But thats just my opinion)
Yeah lol seems like games that are released for base gen consoles while next gen is already out or releasing really didn't run that great. However gta v didn't have as many bugs as cyberpunk currently has. But it is also hard to say which bugs are caused by the deficiencies of the hardware or just by bad programming.
@@g3rdus12 It has to be bad programming honestly. The crashing and bugs aren’t consistent to console or PC. Some people can crash all the time on Xbox One or PS4, while others barely, if ever, crash at all on the same consoles. Even PS5/Xbox Series X have crashes, but random people crash more than others, or run into more bugs than others
PS3 is clearly the better console. Like seriously! Free internet service, Games are on ONE disc, games are on Blu-ray, better library of exclusives, better graphics on exclusives, shit even GTA V is better on PS3. The Xbox 360 version had the intallation problem while PS3 players were just chillin. And I have both consoles. I stopped paying for my Xbox Live membership cuz of next gen but I don't have to worry about not being able to continue playing online on my PS3. The otherday I saw GTA V on redbox for the 360 and you have to rent both discs or it won't work! And you can only play single player on some titles while the PS3 versions you can rent the full game no problem. Don't even get me started on RROD! Xbox fans are so close minded it's depressing.
WiFiPr0 And I bet it's only for multiplayer and PSN. Netflix and other services will still be free. PS plus also gives you free games which kinda makes up for paying.
You were too busy being distracted by how impressive it was at the time. It still amazes me this was even remotely playable on PS3 hardware, best looking game of that generation.
And today everyone whines when a game drops from 60fps to 56fps for two seconds. Back then it was normal to play games at 25fps and everyone was fine with it.
I agree with you, before I owned a PC I didn't have a strong opinion over 30 or 60fps. I knew that 60fps was better and understood that is why games like Forza and GT run at 60fps but I didn't realise just how much of a difference to the gameplay it makes until I played the same game back to back, once at 30fps and again at 60fps. I would always turn graphics settings down to hit 60fps as I believe a game shouldn't look better than it controls
Just checking back on this after getting the game on the Xbox Series X, a bit sad to see we can't properly run GTA V on 4k 60fps yet on the new generation of systems. (Performance and RT Performance are upscaled)
00:42 se vc olhar para o prédio a frete vc pode ver que o objeto saiu de cima do prédio, no ps3 ele continuo ps3 parece ter mais força em questão de objetos mantidos
Played it on both. Xbox 360 in 2015. Playing it on PS3 now. A few points: -Xbox 360 has better antialiasing, better textures, less pop in. -PS3 has better lighting and is better at handling combat with many enemies on screen. The combat mechanics are also more smooth. PS3 looks better at dusk/dawn/night. PS3 cutscenes are also better visually. -Looking at this video, the PS3 handles Trevor's mission at 2:25 like cake! That's really impressive that it runs a whole 10+ frames better than Xbox 360. Trevor's mission at 2:25 demonstrates how well the PS3 handles chaos and numerous explosions (which is why people play GTA 5). When there is a lot of chaos on screen, I would assume Rockstar utilized the SPU's to their advantage which is why it runs so smooth. Xbox 360 runs smooth. But the PS3 version is more impressive in my opinion.
You are right but at 3:21 Xbox 360 went to 36 fames per second which was incredible for a console . I watched the whole video but most of the time Xbox was giving higher framerates because it has more ram than PS3 . Not only GTA V but Xbox runs almost every game better than PS3 . I know you are a PlayStation fan but Xbox was the clear winner.
I cant help wanting a Switch version that will hopefully run at a more stable 30 FPS, drops are to be expected, but maybe they can go for a higher resolution (900p).
Joe Mckay Just face the fact that these two pieces of hardware are great! I don't hate on pc. It is only the people who try to bash consoles that get really annoying.
It's nothing less than stunning that this game runs on 7th gen consoles. It's nothing less than a smack in the face that it's still being sold at full price on 9th gen consoles.
Well that because they have been milking the online mode to death rather than developing a new GTA game. Nobody in 2013 would have throught that the game would been released for third time in 2022
2013 : gta 5 ps3 and xbox 360 gameplay comparaison 2014 : gta 5 ps4 and xbox one gameplay comparaison 2021 : gta 5 ps5 and xbox series x gameplay comparaison 2100 : gta 5 ps14 and xbox series X10 gameplay comparaison Rockstar are you serious
I'm being recommended this, and it makes me feel like if Cyberpunk 2077 ran like this, the backlash wouldn't be as bad. Because even if the performance is subpar, it looks decent enough and is actually playable
@@geraltkos of course it does Ps4 is shit. You need a ps4 pro for a decent experience. A ps4 is A Gtx 1050 and Intel celeron equivalent it wont run cyberpunk well.
Golden Dog connect your computer to your tv with an hdmi cable (cuz wireless has a too much delay), get a wireless kb and mouse so you can control all the other programs, plug in a usb controller/get a wireless dongle, and play the game. lol
Absolutely insane how far games have come in general, INCLUDING this one in particular, LOL. I seriously can’t believe I played it originally at 15-30fps and it was still one of the best games ever, hands down. I *seriously* didn’t even notice the framerate on my Xbox360 lol.
@@wallysmart2432 except in rare occasions…I’ve been *happily* playing elden ring at 30fps on my steam deck. Just gotta CRANK that motion blur. Not ideal, but definitely still playable! I could personally *never* go back to 30 fps in a game like gta V at this point, though. 60fps+ really does spoil us.
PS3 has a little bit more graphics, but xbox has better frame rate. I prefer ps3, and i have one, but nothing will stop my pc... i think that for less 3 or 4 fps and a little bit more graphics is worth it! (especially because xbox needs 2 cds, cmon xbox!)
It depends if u want cross chat party choose xbox if u want free ps online then get ps3 if you want more dowloadables choose xbox if you want a good d pad choose ps3 if u want a really good controller choose xbox so its ur choice ok dont make people decide for u and i recomed u get a ps3 for free multiplayer since ur poor
People forget that these consoles were extremely powerful for their time. When the cell processor was properly used it produced graphics similar to the next gen consoles . Just look at the last of us
0:43 here you can see that theres less details in the xbox 360 version at the top right the name of the building disappears so thats why theres a but more frames on xbox 360 and PlayStation likes more details in their games, same thing with next gen xbox one has way less details that ps4
Couldn't agree more. A true technical marvel considering how little they had to work with. I actually think they took it too far. I revisited this on my 360 earlier this week, and the ground shadows both the playable and NPCs cast are very high res, and EVERY NPC in the game has a face detailed enough to be featured in a cutscene. Plus heavy post processing, including DoF and volumetric lighting and godrays through the smog of Los Santos. I feel like if they dialed back the visuals a tad, they'd still have a great game, but it wouldn't turn into a PowerPoint presentation as often.
a true technical achievement, aside from making this run on this consoles, is the Half life 2 port for the OG 2001 xbox. The console only had 1/3 of the minimum specs and they still managed to make a working port for it
Yeah I keep hearing people saying how gta v ran great on base generation consoles back then lol. Might have had fewer bugs (which are probably related to hardware deficiencies in the case of cyberpunk) but still ran like shit.
It's kinda crazy how Digital Foundry reporting raised expectations on framerate in console games. On PS360 consoles unstable framerate in 20-30 usually with V-sync off for latency reduction in sub 720p resolution (Farcry 3) was kinda common. Go to 2024 where is expected for AAAs to run at 1440-4K res at stable 60 and we have tricks in form of upscalers, frame generation and VRR. Literary night and day from there to now in the last 10 years.
@@ritik2028 I played it when I was 6 or 5 years old the day it came out so at the time it didn't look bad. but as a teenager now who replayed the game several times on the xbox one and now on PC, the 360 version has so many jaggies and I also noticed that the shadows had a ton of issues. GTA 5 uses some sort of checkerboard rendering and it renders everything in front of the player at a lower resolution. last gen consoles played the game at 720p so objects were being rendered up to around 360p or maybe even lower. plus, the only form of AA was shitty FXAA that barely killed the jaggies. on PC at 1080p and current gen consoles, the same applies but there's a lot less due to the 1080p. on new gen consoles, assuming they're going to play at 4k with distance scaling at max and extended distance scaling bumped up there should be next to no jaggies. I do wish GTA 5 used some sort of TAA like red dead 2 does.
@@OutlawedPoet i think you are just focusing TOO much on graphics over gameplay or story, I mean people can like what they like but cmon poor anti-aliasing is what makes it look bad? I play pc too and have played gta v on it, it looks great on higher graphics settings even in 2020. but I don’t really care for graphics or shit anti-aliasing since I was born and grew up in the early 2000s with 240-480p textures like elder scrolls iv: oblivion that came out in 2006. But at the same time I guess bad graphics could turn a new person off from an older or newer game.
I know people complain about re releases but could you imagine if this was the only way to play it on console? I doubt I'd be able to put up with it for very long
Well that because PS4 and XB1 were hardly next-gen. Come on PS4 and XB1 couldn't run VGX E3 2013 version of Witcher 3, let alone Cyberpunk 2077 from teaser trailer But well you can´t blame Sony and Microsoft for making PS4 and XB1 underpowered, as the PS3 and Xbox 360 were very powerful when they came out but they were unprofitable for both Sony and Microsoft
GTA SA was poorly optimized in PC A NVIDIA GeForce 2 MX 400 GPU, with a single core AMD Athlon XP 1700+ CPU. Can actually run Half Life 2 better than GTA SA
The fact that they got this thing to run on PS3/Xbox hardware is an amazing technical achievement on the order of what Asobo did with MS Flight Simulator!
So interesting to watch this all these years later
yash buddha I have been for 5 years lol
your verified??
Am I verified?
@Sr Anonimos eres mi ídolo xD
@@logannaslund1057 No
This game lasted so long you’ll be able to do a ps3 vs ps5 comparison
@Foaad Hisham still lasted ridiculously long without being rereleased is the thing. There have been no new additions to the game series. Unlike elder scrolls where they made elder scrolls online fir example.
@Foaad Hisham its insane how people have been playing the same game for 7 years
@@HaroldTheWizardCat i mean, i only got to play it this year cause i got a decent pc, i had bever played it before
@@HaroldTheWizardCat there's GTA online and people still play GTA SA and 4 too so it's not that surprising GTA V is still popular.
Hey i got news for ya buddy... uh yeah
No one:
RUclips recommendations in 2020: Yo man, wanna see GTA 5 Xbox 360 vs PS3 comparison?
I arrived using the RUclips search engine
I type in XBOX X-SERIES and got this in search results, lol
i searched for this video
it's nice to come full circle on a generation, nearly 7 years ago we were about to get a watered down version of a game that would come back stronger than ever in a year on the next gen, and then PC would take it further. We're a bit further out from RDR2 at this point, but it will be great to see what they deliver for next-gen in terms of "upgrades" or patches for next-gen, not to mention whenever GTAVI comes out, it will have essentially skipped a generation, since GTAV was a previous generation game first.
@@Sinbad1999 me too
That’s crazy on how we used to play at 24fps and didn’t care at the time, we just liked the game
Many people cared. It’s not like no one ever cared about fps "back then"
@@maaax1173 still fun who cares it isn't competitive it's a gta LoL
@@siphobrisloks8133 I‘m saying that it’s not as simple as people think, even when Gta 5 launched people did indeed care about fps, and they always will and have almost always did
I never looked at specs or cared about fps back when the PS3 released. I just assumed this is how games ran and some are better then others. I just played games because I liked playing games. This is the first year I've ever seen any specs for consoles and ever seen them advertised as a selling point. I miss the days were I bought a console for new games and to play with my friends and my brother instead of getting all worked up over which specs are better and if HDMI 2.1 runs at full bandwidth or not and what resolution and refresh rate the console runs games it. I love but also hate knowing and learning about all this technical stuff. Miss the simpler days being oblivious to it all.
@@nathanpickering6742 fr
24 fps on Ps3, a real cinematic experience....
22 on 360
All games on Playstation are a cinematic experience. Uncharted, the last of Us, God of War... All the cinematic narrative experience in outstanding 24fps
@@Xenom1994 no
@@hugo-garcia The Last Of Us drops to 20 FPS on PS3
@wes but with worst performance, Halo 4 is the most demanding Xbox 360 exclusive game and never drops below 28 FPS, even at split screen and multiplayer, and Gears Of War 3 too, while The Last Of Us just some times are at 30 FPS because the game runs more like 27-20 FPS, but with the motion blur looks more like 40-30 FPS, is not unplayable, but is not a big ideal
This game is still an amazing technical achievement on the previous gen consoles
actually pretty good for a 2005 console.
2006-07
@@herrboritooriginal9670 360 launched in 2005, and runs better than ps3
@@molininicolas Well the ps3 had a harder processor to make games for but technically on paper was better one thing the Xbox 360 had over ps3 was shared ram unlike ps3 having only 256mb for system and 256mb for games, aswell ps3 has bluray unlike the xbox's DVD, so games that were coded mainly for the ps3 like the last of us, etc look better than most xbox 360 games that's because they have mastered how to use the hardware, unlike other developers who had a harder time, but ps3 has faster loading times on a lot of games compared to 360, but both consoles are good, the 360 is impressive for what it did
@@obamascock2169 The most impressive game that i played on that generation was the Halo 4, and i think it's better than TLOU graphically speaking.
@@obamascock2169 technically, the xbox 360 also had a faster gpu than the ps3, but the ps3 had a faster processor so basically one was better for graphics while the other was better for processing
I remeber playing this on the PS3 for the first time. Good times!
Good times on the worst version get outta here
Ansem this was a year old comment bruh
@@ansem383 sorry he had a ps3
If you love Xbox you don't need to insult people for it
@@rezonan3520 yea he's salty
Ansem PS3 Was far more powerful, frame rate improved on PS3 years later
You know..? Bad as these seem on paper with their really low framerates, I actually found the experience quite enjoyable on Xbox 360 at the time. The game being third person definitely helped though. Only weird thing I noticed was that occasionally, the entire game would just hang up for a second or two, then go back to normal. Probably some kind of VRAM issue on the old consoles. Either way, they did a great job getting them to even function on 360/PS3.
@Kuma Were you not supposed to? Or maybe it was optional at the time? I forget.
@@TrashWoodBand OH I get what you mean now. No, I didn't install it if I remember correctly. Just the install disc. It was really weird because I remember none of my friends having that problem at the time and it didn't happen in any other games. I dunno, weird.
@@XtremeConditions I wonder if the problem is a bad hard drive? I have a similar stutter on my PC. The physical RAM starts to fill up, so GTA V uses the hard drive to store virtual RAM. Then I think the game stutters, because it is trying to load its content and store virtual RAM at the same time. I can see the HDD indicator lit solid. My PC is older, but i don't think it would cause stutter.
I wonder if your Xbox 360 has a bad hard drive that can't handle GTA V.
defenitely a ram issue, thats why you always saw the lods glitchign while driving fast xD
Everyone then:
impressed by GTA V on 7th-gen consoles
Everyone now:
"impressed" by GTA V on 9th-gen consoles
Was that, like, confirmed? I haven't seen it anywhere...
@@MultiTelan PS5 Reveal
Apparently there is going to be an "enhanced" version of the game for the next gen consoles and upgrades to the PC version.
@TheLegend In Online it constantly drops below 30 LMAO
According to Wikipedia, they're not confirmed to be 9th gen yet
@@matthewmangan5161 They confirmed it on the ps5 reveal.
It's crazy how good this game looked at the time. It really had no right running on a PS3/360.
Yes, especially for a complete open world experience.
the framerate is so bad it's disgusting they even released it on those consoles
@@torkicks2670no it's not, they got better after some patches at stables 30fps
@@torkicks2670I've been playing on 360 for a while now and gta 5 runs perfectly
I dont get why framerate is so important, it isnt even noticable, if runs smooth
@@torkicks2670it isn't different from PS2 era. GTA San Andreas runs on PS2 with constant frame dips.
Still can't believe this is running on hardware released in 2005!
ayo psivewri what you doin here
for a second the 360 went to 36fps
3:21
and 16 too
+adrian adrian lol
Xbox 360 is better
+Themanettedeps4danslachateatamèrelapute 78 no PS3 is better
I'm impressed it runs so well on such old hardware. on another note, 30 fps on the ps3 feels far smoother than 30 fps on my computer for some reason.
The input lag becomes more unoticeable when using a Joystick like PS3's. But when you specifically use a mouse, your brain expects action to occur as fast as you move the mouse, turning you more aware of the FPS limit.
GZ Broadcast even with a controller, just visually it looks more choppy. Some voodoos going on
Robin Rai Lol, or maybe your TV Smoothes out low FPS, mine does.
Probably frame-pacing issues.
bro :o
I remember playing this and I never thought or cared about the framerate. Same with GTA 4, I used to think it was just lag and that it’ll fix itself. Crazy how bad they ran.
H. E. M. Yeah looking back now, the performance was below subpar for sure. But the experience was worth it.
Yea H.E.M. so shut the fuck up
i swear it was like 4k 240fps RTX on
Relatable
I guess that was then
Ps3 gamers played this game and they were happy... xbox 360 gamers did the same and they were happy... so who the fuck cares about which one is better? And pc gamers... wtf are you doing here? It's just a frame rate comparison between ps3 and xbox 360! WE ALL KNOW that pc has the best framerate, graphic, resolution, ecc. but please, STOP IT!
True what ever you say is true
Tantum Gladis 'Sides, this so-called "master race" joke is immature and outright condescending anyway. There's good-natured banter, and then there's this.
Tantum Gladis I'm here to compare them. I mean I'm a PC gamer but I used to own it on the PS3 and like to see which one holds up compared to the other. I've played with some crazy intense moments online where the frame rate gets probably as low as 10. But that's with players and cops everywhere inside giant fire fights. I've never played the 360 version personally so I need to know which one holds up better! That's why I'm here.
Andrew Huss true do u have Ps3
Stratos Kozpanis i do
its a miracle that rockstar even managed to get this running at a playable framerate.thre isnt much difference between the two
you don't have a lot of details in the 7th gen platforms that you have in other platforms.
This game was made in both consoles so there would be no trouble like GTA IV
I’m here after seeing Cyberpunk performance deciding if it’s worth it or not, I remember I got used to GTA v after a while back in the day.
I was thinking then same thing but playing an fps at 25 fps or an third person shooter is a very different thing imo.
@@ChrisBa303 lol except it's not 25 more like 16 fps
Frame pacing makes all the difference too, a locked 30 fps game feels waaaay smoother than a game that swings between 45 and 60
@@NullPointer Oh yeah good ol Bloodborne is what comes to mind.
@@Dr_Adamo Indeed!
Conclusion : There are both better than my PC.
Florentin same
SAME... xddd
MAYBE YOUR PC IS BETTER THAN MY PC
Soviet_Kirby420.69 not me I get 60 FPS :(
same
it's weird but on consoles anything below 30 fps is still quite smooth but on PC...😅...it feels like someone clicked the pause button..
optimization perharps?
wtf under 30 fps feels like shit on all platforms.
but it seems so smooth in the video
If you play with a controller on PC it's the same
If you play with a controller on PC it's the same
I love how they didn't change anything like they did for GTA IV.
By a appearance, no, but by the way the game is rendered and coded, it's very different.
lafincow12 It doesn't matter, just to work normal on both.
xXSilentAgent47Xx conclusion: gta 5 ps 3 edition has better graphics but gta 5 xbox360 edition has a faster FPS speed
Mythoclast but if you look at the numbers the fps is bad on both
@myth "faster ffs speed" lmao what does that even mean?
Wow I didn't realize it was like this back then, I loved the 360 version. I just barely got the PC version and it's amazing how modern it still is. Very impressive it ran on that old hardware even in the state it did.
I'll always say this - it was a technological miracle it ran as well as it did on 360/PS3!
@@TKIvanov Not really that miraculous when it's borderline unplayable.
@@El-Duderino-His-Dudeness I was perfectly fine with it at the time. I also want to reiterate my previous comment. You have to understand that was hardware released in 05!
@@El-Duderino-His-Dudeness Actually it's very playable, you just need a short time to get used to it then you could basically play the whole game in 24fps and be fine. Not ideal at all (I run my games at 100+fps now lol), but just barely good enough.
@@El-Duderino-His-DudenessPC masterrace 60 FPS gamers should tone down when it comes to consoles. Look at shitty Switch hardware struggles to run BOTW and TOTK and see how general public perceived it. For many casuals, 25 FPS and above is already playable as long as it could maintain frame pacing.
if you run towards the police cars as trevor in the snowy shootout that was shown it just cuts to the cutscene instantly.
Someone here after the Cyberpunk release?
I wish I was 15 again like when this launched and it bothered me way less :(
@@Dr_Adamo The thing is , this runs way better than CP2077
Yeah, This was relatively stable compared to CP77. There's a huge difference with having a FPS that's stable (27-30 FPS range) compared to CP77's (15-30 FPS).
@@TheLifesach33z 27-30? hahaha gta v is 17-30
Yeah I came here actually to remind myself that gtav did run like shit on its launch consoles before reminding people about that without facts. Gtav had committed development for 2 consoles, and it runs like shit. It’s a demanding game for those consoles. Cyberpunk wasn’t committed to just 2 consoles, but 9 versions, and it runs like shit on 2 of them. Mainly because they didn’t put enough care into those base console versions and launched too early.
It's amazing GTA 5 on PS3 running smoothly despite having 256mb ram
Till this day, I’m still incredibly impressed by the fact that GTA V was able to run in those machines. I was blown away when I first played it, seeing how much Rockstar was able to squeeze out from the machines that has so little power compared to PCs and even the Wii U.
It was a massive leap from GTA IV and even Red Dead Redemption, and while it looks poor when compared to the PC version and the Xbox One/PS4 version, it’s still one of the best looking games to ever run on the 360 and PS3.
Wii U, actually in raw gpu power it was a bit weaker than the 360... perhaps a little stronger than the PS3. What the Wii U had over them was a LOT more ram. If you want to know where Nintendo goes shopping, look at the gpu bin e-waste at a recycling centre, where you can buy 10 year old tech for pennies on the dollar.
Even with the Switch Nvidia was almost giving it away as Tegra was a giant flop elsewhere.
It's funny how this was reccomended to me after watching countless cyberpunk 2077 PS4 performance videos.
Crazy how it runs much worse than 24 fps during fight scenes hopefully it gets better
@@brauliodeans9437 now runs 30fps, and what abaut gta on ps3 and xbox after "8years of patching"?
2:43 seems that the 360 cant handle many movements and explosion at a time
Sahil King if you rewind the video the same thing happens to the ps3
That because the explosion thing and all around texture is work with the strong processor
Cell processor on ps3 is really powerfull than xbox 360
But when comes to graphical power xbox 360 win
Dont worry you will be able to play gta 5 on both consoles at 30fps at all times here the fps is lowered beacuse he is recording
@@namanaggarwal8009 are u sure?
@@siphobrisloks8133 he's doing sarcasm . Don't be serious
The fps never really bothered me somehow
That’s cuz you never tried it on pc
@@ansem383 yeah for pc gamer fps number one but gameplay second thing
@@ansem383 yeah my pc run gta v at 10 fps because im poor and i live in ecuador jeje xd hablo español y soy tercermundista y peleo con gringos en los comentarios de youtube
Idc about fps. I could barley notice it
I remember when this came out lol. I was a broke college kid and the day of launch i literally stuffed my backpack with about 10-15 of my games on my 360 and walked to gamestop about a mile from my school on lunch break. I had maybe 10 bucks in my wallet and I traded in what I had to to make the difference. Zero regrets.
I once took 12 games to GameStop and got 3 dollars and a hot pocket
This was 120 frames per second for us back then
Speak for yourself. I quit a few hours in and just waited for the PC release.
@@Phil_529 he's talking about console kids back then, not about the guys that played it on pc.
I bought it on 2013 and played until 2015. Fps was too low man, it was hard to play. It's just your nostalgia who speak.
I remember fps was so low that i thought my console was broken.
Xbox 360 > PS3
PS4 > Xbox One
PC > All
sry Sony is always the best, no fanboy
Call me when you get 4k 60fps
You're wrong about 360>PS3
MattPlays call me when atleast 10% of the people will play on 4k :)
Bartosz Dmochowski in 10 years
Top 5 worst fanboys
1.Pc Fanboys
2.Sony Fanboys
3.Microsoft Fanboys
4. Nintendo Fanboys
5. Portable gaming fanboys (phones) (handheld gaming) etc....
Fanboy
HAHA
you ar right
I think you are right. But I think Microsoft fanboy are worst than Sony. But I agreed with PC fanboys are the worst , and I am a PC gamer.
Dyms roro Dude i'm on ps4 and even i can't deny how terrible these sony ponies are go on any gaming vid about consoles and the comments will be asshat sony fanboys talking crap about xbox.
Christian Jordan you forgot apple fanboys(not gaming fanboys, but fanboys anyway) they are the worst kind of fanboys
Super impressive work by Rockstar on PS3 here, especially after how terrible GTA IV ran on the console. And streaming half the content from the BluRay disc and half from the HDD to double the transfer rate... just great engineering.
the hdd+dvd/flash drive method was also suggested on xbox 360 by rockstar.
GTA IV runs terrible everywhere, unfortunately. It's even worse on PC, even with today's gear.
@@untildePoor optimisation with terrible port. Although dxvk helps it a lot and with Riva tuner FPS cap to 60, game is very smooth and to be fair... I like it's look more then GTA 5. Not to mention the story.
First time tried running GTA IV on my laptop it got loud and hot so fast, all the while running like crap. I was legit worried about the heat in particular. I play GTAV regularly and it's night and day. To this day I haven't been able get an hour into IV.
Yeah I remember trying it on PC, had to reduce the quality a lot at the time. I wonder what happened to the engine in GTA IV vs other versions? Seems like they dropped the ball.@@Light-Rock97
Its shocking to think that GTA V ran on these 2005/2007 machines.
Those were simpler times, were just happy playing GTA at 20fps, crazy, were getting old buddies
i just watched this and fifa 14 and they are the same thing. hilarious they even make comparisons between xbox 360 and ps3. These consoles were made to play games both equally. No one is better than the other. A real comparison would be ps3 vs ps4 and xbox 360 vs xbox one.
retarded comment. Go read the written review the link is in the description.
I see what you're getting at. When you're getting a sub 30 FPS experience, the 2-4 FPS difference, even if it hits 30 for a millisecond doesn't make a damn difference in the world. Graphics don't matter if going high speed in a car makes you want to tear out yer fucken eyeballs. :P
It still felt very smooth compared to MGS V. On the latter I got headaches from extended play. Both amazing games though.
Thanks for recommending this to me in 2020. So relevant.
And I watched it anyway. I have no life.
Today: Under 30fps unplayable. For 7 Years: Under 30fps its runs great. Times changes.
Nobody said that ever wtf.
Frame rates have been criticized since the NES era, and probably even before that.
@@OscarLopezCe Then you live in a bubble when you not hearing that.
@@Sanzzes-city Hell no. I meant that, 7 years ago, people weren't saying "iT rUns GrEaT" to shit framerates.
Under 70 is unplayable for me
@@K3Vz0 In 4k is 60 Unplayable 4me
holy shit I used to play this game on such shitty settings and with such a shitty framerate
what do you mean by "used to"? Did you upgrade to a newer game console or pc? If pc, what specs?
h7opolo I used to play it on xbox 360 it would stutter but it was pretty playable they do something with consoles that makes shitty framrates fun an playable. But yeah I played it on pc and would get like 80 on high pretty tight. I got this laptop for college and it's pretty cheap but it's got a 960m and ok other specs
Sam Ferguson Calm your pc elitist bitch ass down
There's nothing wrong with console. Its cheap and in middle or high school its all anyone has so yeah and the graphics aren't that bad and its playable but I guess I like how smooth the pc version is
Console pleb is plebbing lol
I hate how people in the "Console wars" base it off of their own personal prejudices...Seriously...same ass gameplay, very very minute ass differences...doesn't matter...Its all about your preferences...Do you have a lot of money, or a little? Are you going to be using your device for reasons other than gaming, or not? Is it just you who games in your home, or do multiple people game...asking yourself these questions will determine which one is right for you, but to make petty ass fights for no reason (like children) truly baffles me...
(But thats just my opinion)
ezekiel medrano u forgetting that ps3 has v synch and 360 doesnt
who else come here after playing cyberpunk 2077 on base/slim ps4
Yeah lol seems like games that are released for base gen consoles while next gen is already out or releasing really didn't run that great. However gta v didn't have as many bugs as cyberpunk currently has. But it is also hard to say which bugs are caused by the deficiencies of the hardware or just by bad programming.
@@g3rdus12 It has to be bad programming honestly. The crashing and bugs aren’t consistent to console or PC. Some people can crash all the time on Xbox One or PS4, while others barely, if ever, crash at all on the same consoles. Even PS5/Xbox Series X have crashes, but random people crash more than others, or run into more bugs than others
Somehow it felt quite smooth when I was playing it back then
Because you didn't know any better
The fact that we're going to have this same exact test, on the same game, on consoles two generations ahead of this, is crazy lol
PS3 is clearly the better console. Like seriously! Free internet service, Games are on ONE disc, games are on Blu-ray, better library of exclusives, better graphics on exclusives, shit even GTA V is better on PS3. The Xbox 360 version had the intallation problem while PS3 players were just chillin. And I have both consoles. I stopped paying for my Xbox Live membership cuz of next gen but I don't have to worry about not being able to continue playing online on my PS3. The otherday I saw GTA V on redbox for the 360 and you have to rent both discs or it won't work! And you can only play single player on some titles while the PS3 versions you can rent the full game no problem. Don't even get me started on RROD! Xbox fans are so close minded it's depressing.
Kiss that free online for PSN once next gen consoles are out..
PlayStation+ is gonna cost ya.
WiFiPr0 And I bet it's only for multiplayer and PSN. Netflix and other services will still be free. PS plus also gives you free games which kinda makes up for paying.
WiFiPr0 Yeah but you can still play online for free on the PS3 :p
the ps4 you have to pay for internet with playstation plus
Timmy Tran Yeah, OR you could keep the PS3 and play online for free.
I played it on ps3 when it came out. Didnt remember this bad framerate
Maybe cuz u had a better version (Slim and ultra slim)
It doesn’t stutter at all I was impressed, but gta4 was horrible for it
On 360 this happens on skyrim but it runs gta5 very nicely
You were too busy being distracted by how impressive it was at the time. It still amazes me this was even remotely playable on PS3 hardware, best looking game of that generation.
Updates fixed all those
And today everyone whines when a game drops from 60fps to 56fps for two seconds. Back then it was normal to play games at 25fps and everyone was fine with it.
I agree with you, before I owned a PC I didn't have a strong opinion over 30 or 60fps. I knew that 60fps was better and understood that is why games like Forza and GT run at 60fps but I didn't realise just how much of a difference to the gameplay it makes until I played the same game back to back, once at 30fps and again at 60fps.
I would always turn graphics settings down to hit 60fps as I believe a game shouldn't look better than it controls
gta 5 is a technical masterpiece at the time, rockstart have alot of wizards to produce something like gta 5 in ps3 & 360
Just checking back on this after getting the game on the Xbox Series X, a bit sad to see we can't properly run GTA V on 4k 60fps yet on the new generation of systems. (Performance and RT Performance are upscaled)
00:42 se vc olhar para o prédio a frete vc pode ver que o objeto saiu de cima do prédio, no ps3 ele continuo ps3 parece ter mais força em questão de objetos mantidos
Wow, indeed! Good eyes!
Played it on both. Xbox 360 in 2015. Playing it on PS3 now. A few points:
-Xbox 360 has better antialiasing, better textures, less pop in.
-PS3 has better lighting and is better at handling combat with many enemies on screen. The combat mechanics are also more smooth. PS3 looks better at dusk/dawn/night. PS3 cutscenes are also better visually.
-Looking at this video, the PS3 handles Trevor's mission at 2:25 like cake! That's really impressive that it runs a whole 10+ frames better than Xbox 360.
Trevor's mission at 2:25 demonstrates how well the PS3 handles chaos and numerous explosions (which is why people play GTA 5). When there is a lot of chaos on screen, I would assume Rockstar utilized the SPU's to their advantage which is why it runs so smooth.
Xbox 360 runs smooth. But the PS3 version is more impressive in my opinion.
You are right but at 3:21 Xbox 360 went to 36 fames per second which was incredible for a console . I watched the whole video but most of the time Xbox was giving higher framerates because it has more ram than PS3 .
Not only GTA V but Xbox runs almost every game better than PS3 . I know you are a PlayStation fan but Xbox was the clear winner.
I cant help wanting a Switch version that will hopefully run at a more stable 30 FPS, drops are to be expected, but maybe they can go for a higher resolution (900p).
should be more than 30 fps on a switch in docked mode
I'm very sure the switch can handle gta v at 900P at a stable 30FPS with NO fps drops.
Switch can run GTA V without any problem, there may be crashes, but it is fully playable.
There it is, everyone. The next-gen consoles are out and these videos are in our feed again.
XDDDD
Wtf I can't believe we really played that shit on 22-30 fps with an average of like 25 fps
I remember playing this thinking this was 60fps on my xbox LOOOOL
Same
@otaku ze preguiça o cara vai falar em inglês e manda um kkkk
Me too hahahaha
@@firedstand1862 br e comedia
28 fps? No wonder these piece of shit consoles are only worth $100 nowadays :p
pretty sure its because they're 7-8 years old. try that on a pc thats 7-8 years old in specs.
arnaldo vargas it would easily run it a lot better lol
Joe Mckay lol that a really nice joke.. but no it wont..
Well these 2 consoles are like 8 years old. Consoles are meant for gaming. No need to swap graphic card and other stuff.
Joe Mckay Just face the fact that these two pieces of hardware are great! I don't hate on pc. It is only the people who try to bash consoles that get really annoying.
Its always interesting to watch next gen games on last gen consoles, like cyberpunk running on the Xbox one s is the same story with GTA 5 on the 360.
Is it stupid if i say 24FPS on consoles looks 1000x better than 24FPS on PC. Probably because more consistent frametimes.
That's Because you're playing with controller
Mean while on pc when you move the mouse you start you feel the slow downs
GTA5: Oh boy, I can't wait for people to compare me when I finally launch at PS5!
This is how GTA6 is going to run on base PS5
If they could run GTA 5 on a PS3/XBOX 360, why the hell can't they run remasters of a 20 year old game on the Switch??
It's nothing less than stunning that this game runs on 7th gen consoles. It's nothing less than a smack in the face that it's still being sold at full price on 9th gen consoles.
Well that because they have been milking the online mode to death rather than developing a new GTA game.
Nobody in 2013 would have throught that the game would been released for third time in 2022
Can Somebody help me out here I need this software or hardware use in this video to test frame rates please.
2013 : gta 5 ps3 and xbox 360 gameplay comparaison
2014 : gta 5 ps4 and xbox one gameplay comparaison
2021 : gta 5 ps5 and xbox series x gameplay comparaison
2100 : gta 5 ps14 and xbox series X10 gameplay comparaison
Rockstar are you serious
Lol
Lol (2)
I found a 360 copy in June 2020! am excited to experience the game on this very old hardware :)
Funda-se q ele é antigo ele roda melhor q teu PC batata
@@batata8279 داشی ما که نفهمیدیم چی میگی، ساغیت خوبه؟ انقدر خز نباش
Rockstar could never figured out The Cell CPU in any of their games.
Many 3rd Party Devs couldn't
LA Noire was the exception imo
Yeah, because the Cell CPU sucked.
@AleksSDF Someone gets it. IIRC cell was really got for particle effects and the like
I'm being recommended this, and it makes me feel like if Cyberpunk 2077 ran like this, the backlash wouldn't be as bad. Because even if the performance is subpar, it looks decent enough and is actually playable
The thing is that it runs like that on ps4 after patch 1.04 but people are still butthurt for their 2 days of not playing a game
@@shuttzi9878 cyberpunk looks worse
@@geraltkos no it doesn't yall just tripping but if u want the best experience on last gen consoles then buy a CRT
@@geraltkos of course it does Ps4 is shit. You need a ps4 pro for a decent experience. A ps4 is A Gtx 1050 and Intel celeron equivalent it wont run cyberpunk well.
@@shuttzi9878 In online. Story mode is pretty stable on ps4
Played the ps3 version for 300h and for me it was 100% smooth.
Now, after my mainplatform is the pc with 60fps in every game, it is unplayable
Harman I did it. I can still play on console.
it wasn't 100% smooth. you were just use to trashs so u didnt notice
@Harman Try CRT GTA V 2048*1536 with Zero Motion Blur
Who's here after Cyberpunk 2077?
Knew I wasn't the only one.
Watching this really makes you appreciate how good it looks in 4K on a PC today
Buy an expensive PC. Connect to your tv. Plug in xbox control.
Life.
+John Fransson Amen to that.
+John Fransson ikr. best way to game. i'm also writing this comment while sittning on my bed with a mini keyboard on my gaming pc.
+BangarangHUN wow you are so cool
Golden Dog You... just play? With a controller you know?
Golden Dog connect your computer to your tv with an hdmi cable (cuz wireless has a too much delay), get a wireless kb and mouse so you can control all the other programs, plug in a usb controller/get a wireless dongle, and play the game. lol
Thanks for the vid. I was also wondering if you would pick up extra frames by switching down to 720p.
No because it natively runs at 720p as is. The 360's upscaling to 1080p is done by hardware separate from the gpu so it doesnt effect performance.
This is in 720 bro... xbox 360 and ps3 only run up to 720p and sometimes even lower.
Absolutely insane how far games have come in general, INCLUDING this one in particular, LOL.
I seriously can’t believe I played it originally at 15-30fps and it was still one of the best games ever, hands down.
I *seriously* didn’t even notice the framerate on my Xbox360 lol.
WELL ONCE YOU GO 60FPS U CAN NEVER GO BACK.
@@wallysmart2432 except in rare occasions…I’ve been *happily* playing elden ring at 30fps on my steam deck. Just gotta CRANK that motion blur. Not ideal, but definitely still playable!
I could personally *never* go back to 30 fps in a game like gta V at this point, though. 60fps+ really does spoil us.
i swear this was like 60 fps when i played now i see how bad it was lmao
PS3 has a little bit more graphics, but xbox has better frame rate. I prefer ps3, and i have one, but nothing will stop my pc... i think that for less 3 or 4 fps and a little bit more graphics is worth it! (especially because xbox needs 2 cds, cmon xbox!)
are you kidding me??? obviously xbox 360 has a better graphics than ps3
***** I have a ps3, and I think the Xbox has better graphics
CRUZifyre no its not man ps3 has better graphics abit
The reason xbox needs 2 CDs is because it's not bluray has nothing to with graphics
Gido Lagerweij are you blind? do not try to deny this, watch the video well
Give me GTA 5 and xbox 360
Give me ps3
Jesse Powell I'm poor
It depends if u want cross chat party choose xbox if u want free ps online then get ps3 if you want more dowloadables choose xbox if you want a good d pad choose ps3 if u want a really good controller choose xbox so its ur choice ok dont make people decide for u and i recomed u get a ps3 for free multiplayer since ur poor
Gabriel Racer Xbox 360 is better.
How about you buy it! lol
People forget that these consoles were extremely powerful for their time. When the cell processor was properly used it produced graphics similar to the next gen consoles . Just look at the last of us
0:43 here you can see that theres less details in the xbox 360 version at the top right the name of the building disappears so thats why theres a but more frames on xbox 360 and PlayStation likes more details in their games, same thing with next gen xbox one has way less details that ps4
Now a handheld APU can play the game at 60 fps. Time flies.
One of the most impressive technical achievements in gaming
Couldn't agree more. A true technical marvel considering how little they had to work with. I actually think they took it too far. I revisited this on my 360 earlier this week, and the ground shadows both the playable and NPCs cast are very high res, and EVERY NPC in the game has a face detailed enough to be featured in a cutscene. Plus heavy post processing, including DoF and volumetric lighting and godrays through the smog of Los Santos. I feel like if they dialed back the visuals a tad, they'd still have a great game, but it wouldn't turn into a PowerPoint presentation as often.
@@qualityesports7802 well just get a pc if you don't want a powerpoint Presentation
a true technical achievement, aside from making this run on this consoles, is the Half life 2 port for the OG 2001 xbox. The console only had 1/3 of the minimum specs and they still managed to make a working port for it
@@smashkommentiert found the pc elitist
@@gta_s555sad just the truth my dude
I apreciate vids like this being suggested in 2020
damn my first build did similar to this.
it was a core 2 quad machine with a gt 730
Show this to people who whine about Cyberpunk's performance on base consoles
Yeah I keep hearing people saying how gta v ran great on base generation consoles back then lol. Might have had fewer bugs (which are probably related to hardware deficiencies in the case of cyberpunk) but still ran like shit.
@@g3rdus12 also have to consider that gta 5 is a much better game though. Better graphics too.
how the heck is the ps3 running on 24fps while it seemed so smooth all these years, console magic i guess
It's kinda crazy how Digital Foundry reporting raised expectations on framerate in console games. On PS360 consoles unstable framerate in 20-30 usually with V-sync off for latency reduction in sub 720p resolution (Farcry 3) was kinda common. Go to 2024 where is expected for AAAs to run at 1440-4K res at stable 60 and we have tricks in form of upscalers, frame generation and VRR. Literary night and day from there to now in the last 10 years.
Same thing happening with the FPS in cyberpunk time flies
The only difference is that cyberpunk crashes compared to this
I 💗 Both game consoles
Omg i cant wait for the Xbox 360 launch!! 😎😎😍🥰🤩🙄 already pre ordered gta 5! looks amazing in graphics!
you preordered a 2013 game for a console came out in 2005, we are looking at some cyberpunk 2077 type of preorder wait lmao
yes omg I love those jagged edges!!! it adds so much to the experience😍🥰😍🥰😍🥰😍🥰🤩🙄🤩🙄
@@OutlawedPoet bruh have u ever played gta 5 on 360 ...it handles it very nicely
@@ritik2028 I played it when I was 6 or 5 years old the day it came out so at the time it didn't look bad. but as a teenager now who replayed the game several times on the xbox one and now on PC, the 360 version has so many jaggies and I also noticed that the shadows had a ton of issues. GTA 5 uses some sort of checkerboard rendering and it renders everything in front of the player at a lower resolution. last gen consoles played the game at 720p so objects were being rendered up to around 360p or maybe even lower. plus, the only form of AA was shitty FXAA that barely killed the jaggies. on PC at 1080p and current gen consoles, the same applies but there's a lot less due to the 1080p. on new gen consoles, assuming they're going to play at 4k with distance scaling at max and extended distance scaling bumped up there should be next to no jaggies. I do wish GTA 5 used some sort of TAA like red dead 2 does.
@@OutlawedPoet i think you are just focusing TOO much on graphics over gameplay or story, I mean people can like what they like but cmon poor anti-aliasing is what makes it look bad? I play pc too and have played gta v on it, it looks great on higher graphics settings even in 2020. but I don’t really care for graphics or shit anti-aliasing since I was born and grew up in the early 2000s with 240-480p textures like elder scrolls iv: oblivion that came out in 2006. But at the same time I guess bad graphics could turn a new person off from an older or newer game.
I know people complain about re releases but could you imagine if this was the only way to play it on console? I doubt I'd be able to put up with it for very long
10 years. Can’t believe that.
ps3 for the win
are you kidding me? I swear this console war will be around for ever.
JumboFPS shut up, PS3 FTW!
ps3 for the WC
what rthe xbox 360 had higher framerate consistency
I hate the gaming community... why? Just look at the comments!
It's called fanboys going on war
Robin The Tactician Same lol 2 years later!
It became even worse... compared to now there was peaceful and civilized discussion 2 years ago.
360 on the explosions went down to 16 frames
I'm really curious on how GTA5 will look like on next gen Console.
Still better than cyberpunk on ps4 and xbox one
Well that because PS4 and XB1 were hardly next-gen.
Come on PS4 and XB1 couldn't run VGX E3 2013 version of Witcher 3, let alone Cyberpunk 2077 from teaser trailer
But well you can´t blame Sony and Microsoft for making PS4 and XB1 underpowered, as the PS3 and Xbox 360 were very powerful when they came out but they were unprofitable for both Sony and Microsoft
It's still amaze me that's it works on PS3 which has 256 MB of RAM (and 256 MB VRAM). GTA San Andreas on PC requires minimum 256 MB of RAM.
GTA SA was poorly optimized in PC
A NVIDIA GeForce 2 MX 400 GPU, with a single core AMD Athlon XP 1700+ CPU. Can actually run Half Life 2 better than GTA SA
oh my god 2020 brought me deep down to a video from 7yrs ago
The fact that they got this thing to run on PS3/Xbox hardware is an amazing technical achievement on the order of what Asobo did with MS Flight Simulator!