I can imagine this being used for Business Jet Airlines or for a premium heavy cabin from legacy carriers. Did a transatlantic flight in Economy with the company and its wasn't my most comfortable flight. Though, I blame the person that truly stunk out the toilet about 25% into the flight.
If you ditched the plane on land with a full tank and no undercarriage, the fuel would be left behind the aircraft as it ripped its belly off, meaning that the passengers were safely ahead of the ensuing fireball. Er, probably. 😁
Such a beautiful aircraft
That AOA is insane, wow!
Beautiful.
Dude, you spilled my orange juice...🤭
I can imagine this being used for Business Jet Airlines or for a premium heavy cabin from legacy carriers. Did a transatlantic flight in Economy with the company and its wasn't my most comfortable flight. Though, I blame the person that truly stunk out the toilet about 25% into the flight.
So by placing extra fuel tank below passengers seat is a new standard in aircraft design?
Indeed , and it is safe by the FAI
@@emmanuelmeysman820 very good design!
If you ditched the plane on land with a full tank and no undercarriage, the fuel would be left behind the aircraft as it ripped its belly off, meaning that the passengers were safely ahead of the ensuing fireball. Er, probably. 😁
And the doors stay on too.
Basically a flying gas tank
A321xlr = 8,700 usg; B757-200 = 11,276 usg. So 77% of a 757 tank
Wow, that is impressive then.