A Glorious Accident (4 of 7) Stephen Toulmin: Descartes, Descartes
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 авг 2016
- An interview with the British philosopher Stephen Toulmin. The scientist is known for his work about moral reasoning. Wim Kayzer questions Toulmin about his theories, his book Cosmopolis, Descartes and he is surprisingly candid about his private life. In the Dutch television show A Glorious Accident (1993) six scientists talk about their visions on their work and the world. Journalist Wim Kayzer asks them: how far did you come in your understanding of our thoughts an actions? What did science really bring us at the end of the 20th century: knowledge or also understanding? Order the dvd-box of A Glorious Accident here: winkel.vpro.nl/een-schitterend...
It doesn't seem possible, but Toulmin was underrated as a philosopher. I cried when I found out that he died.
@@mikekane2492 He was, but I think he should be up there close to Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and co.
@@buddhabillybob 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 tf pp pppòooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooòoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooòoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooòoooooooooooooooooòoooooòoooooòòooòoòoòòooòòooooooòoooòoooòòòòooòoooòòòòò9ooooooòòòoooooooòòooooooòoooooooooooooooopòpòopòopòpòooopooopooooooooooooòoooò
Absolutely! I think he was often more profound than Wittgenstein, but his writings were too easy to understand. You could disagree with him because you knew what he said!
@@daniellagaviria2786 Are you crying? I feel like I'm reading Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations all over again!
Great Toulmin, one of the rhetorical turners in philosophy.
In almost every interview the interviewee says Wim Kayzer he's being far too dramatic about something.
magnificent. a man among men.
@HanCock What on Earth are you trying to say - or for that matter, spell? Better to delete that comment than try to explain it.
1:10:45 - "I think what I'm doing *is* philosophy. It's what would have been called philosophy for much of the history of philosophy. I do really regard this digression that began with Descartes as the pathology, as the pathological phase."
2020/2020, has logic and relevance
profound favs: 36:00-53:00 your mind is not your own but grown by your society.
1:07:07-1:24:24 human v animal, mind v principled acts.
1:24:24-1:28:14 why are humans so nasty? the world will yet be saved.
That cut at 51:00 or wherever was epic.... “spelen van te openbaar!”
Hellow donde puedo encontrar mas videos de el en conferencias
Climate change is the great metaphor of our lives. We’re on a great sea, in the midst of a storm of storms, and the best we can do is be the best sailors we can be.
Please, active the automatic subtitles.
What does he mean by the "music" and Schumann? The world will yet be saved?
1:24:25
1:09:00
50:49 phonixe quote
it is all in pieces, all coherence gone all just supply and all relation
prince subject father son, tis all forgot and everyman alone hath thinks he has got to be a phoenix and there can be none of that kind of which he is but he. - john dunne
ok @ 11:57 he describes the childhood dinner table and the intellectual father that forces his children to converse about intellectual topics as they pertain to history. is it any surprise that Stephen was able to "shut-up, understand and obey" as the male child rather than a daughter forced to endure the same history? I never had children chiefly because our dum-dum reality cannot be explained to a thinking daughter. men like Stephen assume women will be all about love but we do not serve fools... and we are not obligated to love the males we aren't bonded to.
The sack of rats is now opened