David Gordon recommends the following book for those interested in discovering the objective moral validity of natural law, on Aristotelian terms. Rasmussen & Den Uyl - Liberty and Nature. It’s very good.
the speaker and audience demonstrate their preference for being in the lecture hall over being at an ice cream parlor by their action of being there without coercion.
What ought -we- I do? Risk analysis obviates moral absolutism. For example, self defense is proof enough that murder is wrong (wrong enough to make a decision). The only time these collective absolutes need to be constructed is in the context of already having made the decision to enslave, or threaten murder of others.
Very interesting talk.
David Gordon recommends the following book for those interested in discovering the objective moral validity of natural law, on Aristotelian terms. Rasmussen & Den Uyl - Liberty and Nature. It’s very good.
the speaker and audience demonstrate their preference for being in the lecture hall over being at an ice cream parlor by their action of being there without coercion.
Praxeology
Good stuff! I love his dorky dad jokes.
listenable at 1.25x
I think he speaks so slowly so that those of us with average intellects can follow. Or at least have a better chance at following.
@@superhoga No, he's speaking at normal speed, but the sheer power of his IQ bends the space-time around his mouth and makes his words sound slower.
David is a natural comedian
Now do Hoppe
What ought -we- I do? Risk analysis obviates moral absolutism. For example, self defense is proof enough that murder is wrong (wrong enough to make a decision). The only time these collective absolutes need to be constructed is in the context of already having made the decision to enslave, or threaten murder of others.
So your decision whether to murder or not murder comes down to whether or not you judge that you can get away with it?
Then I'm in good company with Gee Willickers.
Gordon ist a genius
Brutal. Retire this guy please.