At the time I was a FX3/FX30 shooter, and when Gerald Undone said that statement it really made me upset (not for myself) cause there could be a percentage of the audience out there that Micro 4/3 could only be the budget they could afford (NOT everyone is so fortunate enough to make RUclips money or go out and get a $2500 Sony camera). So fast forward to today and I no longer use Full Frame equipment but instead use a rigged out GH5s and it's the most fun I've had while filming real paid events (I come from a background of Manual Focusing so I don't mind the lost of Auto Focus). With all due Respect, I stopped watching Geralds videos cause he should have known better to make such a statement as that one. Especially now that we have a G9 ii with Phase Detect Autofocus, it's going to haunt him
The gh5s image looks so good, the camera is so light, understructable, amazing battery life… and so versatile ! From barebones with a tiny m43 prime on a ronin SC shooting beautiful natural colors no post production needed, to a full kit metabones + big EF fast lenses, ninja V shooting ProRes raw…
I have the money to buy any camera in the market, but I use GH5 and GH6. I really felt in love with LUMIX and now I am shooting with anamorphic lens and open gate mode is fantastic
I shoot all my RUclips videos still with a GH5 man and the channel is growing fast. No matter if full frame or M43 what matters is the end result! Nice video bro thank you. It's cool to know you'll be around more often in 2024 but don't rush. Love your content. cheers
I'm actually going to start using my GH5 for social content. I love these cameras. My S5 II X is nice for sure, but the GH6 is just a beast of a camera. Keep using that GH5 man. If you haven't, pair it with an Atomos Ninja V and watch how much better it is
@@jeremypope-levison721 thank you bro for the tip! I even use the Panasonic Image app a lot. I didn't know you also own an S5ii and still recommend a m43. You're great dude 😃👍 You know of what you're talking about. Thank you to be real..! looking forward to your next videos! :))
@kenslyder yeah I picked up an s5 ii x for the photo side of things and I use it when PDAF is necessary, but I still love my GH6/GH5 cameras. Even my Pocket 4ks
*Hi Jeremy 😃 I appreciate your comments on Micro-Four-Thirds technology. Thank you for making this video. Your video convinced me to subscribe to your channel Sir 👍. Just because Gerald Undone says micro 4/3rds is dead brings me to one of my major complaints about the whole Internet-Social Media "Influencer" movement, which is one I think needs to go away ASAP ! Gerald, a fellow Canadian, is indeed very knowledgeable about mirrorless camera technology, but I don't always agree with everything he says. I also shoot some material with a $1,000.00 CAD ZCAM E2C Micro 4/3rds mount camera, and I can also attest to the quality I can obtain with the format - especially when I shoot in 12 Bit ProRes RAW HQ output to my Atomos Ninja V 👌. Although some folks in our independent, freelance shooter industry complain that RAW shooting is somewhat overrated, there's certainly nothing overrated by the results which can be obtained from these cameras when you go from 10 Bit 4:2:0 to 12 Bit 4:2:2. The results from RAW shoots with micro four thirds cameras is a difference your eye can plainly see, and what your clients also can see, IMHO. I think the GH6 is a beast. I also think the S1H is a beast, albeit with a full frame sensor. The Lumix GH series of cameras are truly excellent.*
3:47 I simply call bullsh- on this one. The dynamic range limit is not because of the micro 4/3 sensor, it's because of the noise. If you had looked at the chart you'd have seen the camera can detect 14 stops of dynamic range, indicating the sensor is being read out at 13 bits. 14 bit readout sensors can detect up to 14.9 stops, hence why all the other cameras reach that ballpark. The GH5 was also capped heavily with it's VLOG-L and would only encode LOG at 9bit instead of 10bit severily limiting it's dynamic range, so it's something panasonic is known for doing. This is also the reason why SIGMA FP is capped at 12 stops since it only reads out in 12bits. If the GH6 had one more bit (14bits total), even if it couldn't take advantage of it and simply read it as noise, it would help the noise reduction algorithm by a f- ton thus allowing you to lift the shadows more to reveal information there. With good noise reduction this camera should do 12 stops easily. So don't put it down for for it's sensor size since it can easily make up for it with good post work
Great video man. As someone who has both the FX3 and GH6, the GH6 holds it own in most of the same situations and is way better for handheld work. Well done man, nice video.
Thanks man! As someone who has an s5 ii x, there are definitely times when I go to that over the GH6, but then there are times we're I go to a GH6 over the S5 II X. It's using the right tool for the right job. Also, THANK YOU for watching the video! I've been loving yours, so it's cool to see you watch mine!
At the size and price point compared to the wild range of codecs and frame rates available, I still feel my GH6 packs a punch. I was almost inclined to buy a 2nd one for interview stuff and B cam role. But GH5S colours are so similar that it does the job pretty well.
Jeremy, although i do not shoot M4/3 any more (gone full frame) agreed of course it is not. done, not even close. Black Magic, Panasonic, Olympus (you know their new name), are all still in the game. I love, love, love my GH5 just not low light, self filming and auto focus that has all improved I understand.
Great video and great content. I haven’t upgraded to the GH6 from my GH5 yet, but kind of waiting to see it they release a GH6s type camera. Something like the GH5s. Lower megapixel count for better low light performance , oversized multi-aspect m43 sensor for a slightly wider field of view, shallower depth of field, etc.. Also, from one creator to another, just a little advice. I know it takes a bit more time, but I think it’s a good idea to edit out your breathing sounds. It can be a little distracting. I have the same habit of talking then taking a deep breath, and it’s really comes out in the audio. Anyways, great video and I agree with all your points.
My gh5ii is still so good I haven't found a worthy upgrade, especially when I'm behind the camera. Talking head content is also beautiful from this camera
Ive never shot a gh body but i have the s5ii and an oly em5ii. I think there's a few issues - one Panasonic gets a bad rap in general. Your average newbie wanting a camera is deciding between a canon or sony because those are the popular brands. People are automatically distrustful of brands that are less popular. This is unfortunate, because they offer the best price/performance ratio on the market. Another issue is that consumers dont necessarily know what they want. They want a "pro" camera but don't put any thought into what a pro actually uses. Case in point - whens the last time youve sat down in a theater and watched a movie shot at f/1.4 with af locked on a character as they walk around and blurring out everything else in the scene for the whole movie? Yet that's what people think they need to make a cinematic video. Or whats the last professional movie you've seen shot at night with available light? But that's what they want their camera to do to be "pro." I got an s5ii because im not a working pro and wanted something with AF that could keep up with my toddler for home videos and use for my personal ethnography projects and also use for my photography. The gh6 produces excellent video in the right hands. The a7siii produces horrible footage in the wrong hands. Better to get a gh6 and invest the rest of your budget in audio and lighting than to think you need a high end sony to be a pro.
That's just a narrative that we need to fix as content creators. RUclips has spewed a narrative of what is "cinematic," so people think that's what they need to do. This creates people who just do the same thing over and over again. All I can do is make videos like this that try to change that narrative.
I purchased this camera for the same reason $1000 its too good to pass up, too many people get caught up in MFT and bad autofocus. Neither are a real problem. Even in low light ive just purchased the fastest lenses possible and added a speed booster to some EF glass. Glad you made the video
The AF isn't even that bad. It hunts sometimes for sure, but with the right lenses it can be usable. But yeah, I agree. I use EF lenses as well and it's such a beast
Totally agree with you. I just did not want to add an extra piece with a speed booster, I know sigma (18 - something lens), canon, Olympus and Lumix have great lenses. Honest truth the auto focus I nailed 50% of the times & was auto shooting just wanted it to work more consistently so I moved on. I know you can tweet it and make it work probably every time. I just was not that patient after using my beloved GH5 for 3+ years. Still have it with an 7-14 lens with is a killer.
@@garfieldmtify i shoot mostly manual so it did not bother me much, yeah that 18-35 is gets some nice images, there ways around the speed booster for cheap
Hey Jeremy. I recommend looking closely at any streaking issues and the red line of death (in slow mo). “The DP Journey” and Glenn Fricker reported these issues respectively.
I haven't had any of these issues. I've pushed this camera to it's limits too and I've only dealt with noise but otherwise no straking or red line of death. And I have two of them
And then there is the BGH1, something of an oddball. But a fun little box of a cam. You have to have an external monitor, but since I like to record ProRes on a Ninja, adding one as for monitoring was a natural. Takes some getting used to the menus and the function buttons. A great little package, even when fully built out with mattbox + monitor + external battery to power everything. As you say, as long as you are adding light anyway - which in most cases you should be - the dynamic range is more than adequate.
I've definitely been interested in those box style panasonic cinema cameras. I am tempted to rent the new z-cam MFT global shutter camera though. That thing looks insane
I'm a OM1 user, I can say m43 will die if they don't innovate newer ideas to separate itself from the competition. Another thing that would help is to doing something about those prices. It's on the higher side, closer to some high end APC sensor cameras will better capabilities.
I definitely agree about the pricing. The G9 II is almost the same price as an S5 II X with similar specs. What innovations are you thinking they should do?
Internal NDs ou like Olympus; multi aspect sensor like gh5s; falsd color; SDI; internal Raw; create a more film color (like bm) in a update for all cameras.
I fricken love my GH5 set up and would LOVE to get the GH6 - it looks to be the ultimate camera to shoot sports as well. The only thing that makes me nervous with MFT is low light. That's why I bought a GH5s. I think the GH6s will be very popular with filmmakers.
GH6 is probably my favourite run and gun camera in my kit. I own two of them and they are easily the ones I reach for if I need to do any travel shoot where flight is involved. A two camera kit, all accessories, sound, and batteries to power it can fit in my carry on backpack. I run with the native glass and have the option to shoot from 24-200FF equivalent on lenses that weigh less than a single FF lens. Plus with a 1TB card in the GH6, I can run all day without worrying about media. And a simple V Mount battery and a clip that lets it sit on my pocket and I’m powered for all day as well. There’s not much that comes close. I Panasonic releases a GH7 with nearly identical specs but with better autofocus and (fingers crossed) an internal ND system I 100% am long term bullish on M4/3
100% agree. Such a great camera for run and gun. The IBIS paired with the 12-35 and 35-100 is killer. I hope they add dual native ISO and pdaf to a gh7. NDs would be a plus
@@jeremypope-levison721 If they add Dual Native ISO and PDAF I'm day one buying. They add ND and its my dream run and gun camera. It's almost close to perfect already.
Let me make it simple for you. MFT is good for: 1. Very good internal stabilization (small sensor - easier to stab) 2. Cheap lenses (because of the smaller sensor size mft lenses are less complicated and can cost twice as less than full frame). The downside? Less resolution (yes lenses have their own resolution and shooting 6k on a lens that barely supports 4k is a waste of drive space). Aperture. MFT will never allow to blur the bg like FF. So choice is basically between convenience and beauty.
I agree with your sentiments. I often film corporate events with the GH6 and all interviews with S1H or S5mk2. When the GH7 arrives with PDAF I’ll upgrade. Only thought for you is to listen to your video before publishing, you clearly had a cold when you filmed. I’ve uploaded vids too with mistakes in a bunch of times myself BTW😉
Nice to see someone still making videos about how great the GH6 is. I bought it as my first real camera when it was relatively new, so it holds a special place in my heart and it's nice to see people still advocating for it for a variety of work! Subbed, and hope to see more awesome content from you in my feed!
The GH6 is a fantastic camera that really outperforms its price tag. It punches way above its weight. The only real issue is the autofocus, which isn't great in scenes with a lot of fast movement. But apart from that, I have no major complaints about this camera.
Yeah the AF is an issue, but it's still somewhat usable. I still prefer to manual focus a lot of stuff, but event work I like the AF of the S5 II X. In the end, each job requires different tools
Bro the gh6 hangs in my lineup for sure. I have it as a standalone body and use it with a speed booster or native mft glass and it’s dope. I’ve been happy with lowlight shots and have rigged it out and PRR in 4:3 is awesome! These days my main cameras are the eva1 & s1h. Gh6 is my social media camera for the open gate shooting. Also the photos it takes are dope. The grain just makes it look so good. No complaints with the gh6 and it will hangout with me in my camera trio lineup. Great video bro!
Thanks man! It's definitely a beast. Obviously there are benefits to other cameras, but the GH6 still is alive and well! But yeah the opengate feature is clutch man
I agree that the gh6 is an amazing camera. And that micro four thirds is NOT dead. But Gerald said if you want the “best” image, then micro four thirds is dead. And in that, I agree also. That doesn’t mean it’s a bad image, or a low quality image. Rather, full frame and aps-c has finally caught up, and our offering a “better” image quality then micro four thirds. In either case, micro four thirds is an amazing format, especially for video.
I think "best" is subjective though. Because there's a lot to compare. My whole thing is the recording options and resolution the GH6 offers, competes directly with full frame cameras
The fact that so few people speak about the AFC out of focus "bug" when using frame rates below 48fps (24/25/30) in 4K/C4K/5,7K shows the cameras doesn't sell well. Panasonic never corrected this bug and they don't care. Between all my lenses (10-25mm, 25-50mm, 12-60mm etc) only my 25mm f1.4II works well with low frame rates. Even in Open Gate 5.8K, the AF pulses much more than on the GH5. Also, the fine details are worse than on the GH5 in 4K/C4K because of the digital moiré filter, details look rougher when cropping. In 5,7K details are as good as on the GH5 4K but the IBIS takes a hit, and again almost no influencer speaks about the slight crop and worse IBIS in 5,7K ... It's a shame because the colors are fantastic, much better than my GH5 in my opinion, even better than my G9II and S5II.
I am a M43 user. I do not do much video. Mostly do short 30” clips. I do street photography so I’m photography centric. I love the small size and lightweight characteristics of the GX bodies and primes. The zooms are also relatively small and light. M43 is more than adequate for my needs. Yes, the video features are rich. The GH6 doesn’t interest me. Olympus may be struggling. Panasonic M43 seems to be alive and well. Mask On Nurse Marty (Ret)
The GH6 is an incredible camera and more than enough for most people. However it did have quite a few major issues out of the box like streaking, lower DR at low ISO values and of course the lack of reliable AF. What is exciting is the G9II pretty much fixed all of these issues. DR at base ISO is now better than most APSC cameras (barring XH2s, C70 and some other cameras) and even Canon FF cameras. It is only half a stop behind the top of the line FF cameras. The streaking also seems to have been completely fixed and the AF is competitive with the very best. I think Panasonic did a terrible job marketing it as what it is, a hybrid beast and instead leaned into the photography crowd, which there aren't many in the Panasonic camp.
If definitely been interested in the G9 II. I've heard the AF isn't as reliable as the S5 II X. But I've been tempted to pick on up as a b cam for photo
@@jeremypope-levison721 it is actually way more reliable than the S5iiX since it launched later and the sensor reads out much faster, meaning it can scan the sensor more frequently to confirm focus.
@Animalinfotainment and how is it also in low light? For example I shot an event recently for video at 4000 ISO? I'm genuinely curious about the g9 ii. I've got a lot of mft glass that would be nice to use with it
@@Wildridefilms I will say that is one reason I love the s5 ii x. Having the dual native ISO is amazing. Shot an event on Saturday at 4000 ISO and it's super clean
Do you do freelance work in DFW? Our channel is based out of DFW and I’m running GH6s. They hold up in direct sun 110 degree Texas summer while our GoPros will be shutting off due to heat. If you do freelance work would like to keep you in mind for some of our bigger video shoots where we need help.
if this camera will decrease to the price same of the gh5. i will definetely get one. but to be honest we can find s5ii is below 2k$ in the market. a little more money you can have one.
GH5s are pretty static around $500. The s5 ii you can, but you have to pay extra for the RAW recording or higher than 1080p prores which makes it the X version
Still enjoy using my GH5 (bought 2nd hand dirt cheap - just about $500 last year) which indeed tick all boxes in my checklist. Even its said lousy AF is still good enough for my work, thus nothing much left to complain about. Even though MFT is really going to be a dead format in the future that wouldn't matter AT ALL to me. By that time I would have used my GH5 to death (therefore worth every dime spent). And I'll let me in the future decide which direction to go then... In the end it's only about the RIGHT TOOL for the RIGHT JOB, and that's it.😃
Couldn't agree more. Lots of people jump to the latest and greatest camera, but you can still do crazy things with a GH5. That camera itself is a beast. But M43 isn't dead yet!
@@jeremypope-levison721 Just realized that I forgot the word "if" (MFT is going to be a dead format) in my original post, oops.😆 IMHO this format had deviated from its original direction - the compact & lightweight system with a lot of punch. Considering that today's flagship MFT cameras are about the same size & weight (and price) as FF counterparts simply negate its own format's advantage. Why pay as much for something less? Bring back moderately - sized MFT camera with bell & whistles, and compact ones with lots of functions packed in. This is what I'm expecting for!😃
Great Video! The footage looks great, a little bit too much noise for my taste - but otherwise it looks top tier👌🏻 The thing is that today you can get an apsc camera for around the same price, thats gonna have prob better low light performance and better dynamic range, and many of the features of the GH6. For a few hundred bucks more you can get the Fuji xs20 new and that has basically the same video specs as the XH2s with 6.2k open gate recording. But I am sure it lacks some features of the GH6, so to each and their own. Cameras are just tools and we all value different things for ourselves🤘🏻
How is the autofocus on g6 as you didnt mention much about that? I have a gh5s and find it good in low light, never us the autofocus though as its terrible. Im considering buying the g6 but would really love an improvement in the gh5s AF if you could comment on that and did you say the low light isnt good?
The fact that the gh6 is 1,000 dollars used proves Gerald's point. Im sure if Panasonic actually sold it closer to tbe resale value, the line would literally have to be killed off. And its only a good deal in that unsustainable context (let alone how screwed over the seller must feel for losing 60% value in a year or less). Good vid but that resale value tells me its dead.
I almost bought this camera recently because I found an incredible deal on eBay, but I was looking for a second camera to pair with my S5, and at the end of the day, low light capability is really important for the way I work, and so I just wound up buying a second S5 for even less money. But I’m sure the GH6 is incredible. And like the original s5, not to be overlooked.
I get that. For me that's why I have my s5 ii x but I also work a lot in controlled lighting scenarios so it's not a huge issue for me. But any lumix camera shouldn't be overlooked
@@jeremypope-levison721 I totally agree. I’m about to buy a used S1 H, because my S5 brings me moire every once in a while, which is incredibly annoying. But I love all of these Lumix cameras. Great creative tools. All of them.
I cut my teeth on the GH4/5/5s. Used a combination of M4/3 lenses and adapting canon EF glass. These cameras are tools and you can get incredible footage. I think due to the accessibility of full frame cameras now it ends up being a bad spot for the M4/3 system to be in. You can but a cheap used FF Canon, Sony, and even LUMIX for less than the GH6 used. And novices hear “full frame” without even knowing what it means and lose their minds. Ultimately these are all tools. Me personally I don’t think I’ll go back to anything M4/3 mostly because it doesn’t suit my needs and isn’t the look I prefer in my footage.
The gh6 if you,are behind the camera its a beast, but if you want to use it alone for other type of video for RUclips like vlog or something like that is not so good because of the autofocus, but with the new g9ii that has phase detect autofocus then mft is more than alive.
I think people hate on the AF a bit too much. Paired with the right lens, the AF actually holds pretty well and with the AF limiter, it's even better. But it's definitely not as good as a G9 II
m43 is not dead, but manufacturers tries hard to kill own business: - pany was focused on filmmakers cameras (quite small market) and recently released g9II that is nice camera, but 6 years people waited for an update! And most of us wish to see it in compact body, like GX. - om all in for a wildlife (that is also quite small market), recent om announce is very disappointing. - where is new compact but feature packed and powerful cameras we like m43 for? There is nothing. - even from entry filmmakers position, where is vlogers / youtube content creators cameras? Nothing again. GH or even G9 is overkill, it should be compact and weather sealed.
I think manufacturers hear the wrong things and try to make a camera for everything and it ends up being good for one thing. It's never a given what's going to sell well. I hope they come out with an updated GH6 soon.
Do you have videos on GH6 rigs with monitors recorded to SSD? Also, what setting would you recommend for the internet distribution of a dramatic narrative film?
I just got the video assist myself! Looking to test it out soon. I'm stoked to see how it works. So far the s5 ii x is better with the video assist image wise so I can't wait to see the GH6
To an external monitor. Either Atomos Ninja V with ProRes RAW, or the blackmagic video assist with BRAW. But you can shoot prores 422 through USB to SSD.
M43 is dead to me. The OM-1 was so disappointing and the OM-1 1/2 has been discounted so quickly that I predict we won't have any new products released in 2025. Everyone thought 4/3 format would last forever, remember?
All time Lumix User here and totally with you! The GH6 and especially MFT don't deserve all the hate.
Great video 🙏🏽🙏🏽
It really doesn't! Such a capable camera. Appreciate the love!
At the time I was a FX3/FX30 shooter, and when Gerald Undone said that statement it really made me upset (not for myself) cause there could be a percentage of the audience out there that Micro 4/3 could only be the budget they could afford (NOT everyone is so fortunate enough to make RUclips money or go out and get a $2500 Sony camera). So fast forward to today and I no longer use Full Frame equipment but instead use a rigged out GH5s and it's the most fun I've had while filming real paid events (I come from a background of Manual Focusing so I don't mind the lost of Auto Focus). With all due Respect, I stopped watching Geralds videos cause he should have known better to make such a statement as that one. Especially now that we have a G9 ii with Phase Detect Autofocus, it's going to haunt him
The gh5s image looks so good, the camera is so light, understructable, amazing battery life… and so versatile ! From barebones with a tiny m43 prime on a ronin SC shooting beautiful natural colors no post production needed, to a full kit metabones + big EF fast lenses, ninja V shooting ProRes raw…
I have the money to buy any camera in the market, but I use GH5 and GH6. I really felt in love with LUMIX and now I am shooting with anamorphic lens and open gate mode is fantastic
As a fellow Texas, a new content creator, I am thrilled to find someone here in Texas to listen too.
Thank you! Fellow texas creatives unite!
I shoot all my RUclips videos still with a GH5 man and the channel is growing fast. No matter if full frame or M43 what matters is the end result! Nice video bro thank you. It's cool to know you'll be around more often in 2024 but don't rush. Love your content. cheers
I'm actually going to start using my GH5 for social content. I love these cameras. My S5 II X is nice for sure, but the GH6 is just a beast of a camera.
Keep using that GH5 man. If you haven't, pair it with an Atomos Ninja V and watch how much better it is
@@jeremypope-levison721 thank you bro for the tip! I even use the Panasonic Image app a lot. I didn't know you also own an S5ii and still recommend a m43. You're great dude 😃👍 You know of what you're talking about. Thank you to be real..! looking forward to your next videos! :))
@kenslyder yeah I picked up an s5 ii x for the photo side of things and I use it when PDAF is necessary, but I still love my GH6/GH5 cameras. Even my Pocket 4ks
@@jeremypope-levison721 by the way.. The opening scene of your video is awesome😄
@@kenslyder thank you! Gotta catch people's attention
*Hi Jeremy 😃 I appreciate your comments on Micro-Four-Thirds technology. Thank you for making this video. Your video convinced me to subscribe to your channel Sir 👍. Just because Gerald Undone says micro 4/3rds is dead brings me to one of my major complaints about the whole Internet-Social Media "Influencer" movement, which is one I think needs to go away ASAP ! Gerald, a fellow Canadian, is indeed very knowledgeable about mirrorless camera technology, but I don't always agree with everything he says. I also shoot some material with a $1,000.00 CAD ZCAM E2C Micro 4/3rds mount camera, and I can also attest to the quality I can obtain with the format - especially when I shoot in 12 Bit ProRes RAW HQ output to my Atomos Ninja V 👌. Although some folks in our independent, freelance shooter industry complain that RAW shooting is somewhat overrated, there's certainly nothing overrated by the results which can be obtained from these cameras when you go from 10 Bit 4:2:0 to 12 Bit 4:2:2. The results from RAW shoots with micro four thirds cameras is a difference your eye can plainly see, and what your clients also can see, IMHO. I think the GH6 is a beast. I also think the S1H is a beast, albeit with a full frame sensor. The Lumix GH series of cameras are truly excellent.*
3:47 I simply call bullsh- on this one. The dynamic range limit is not because of the micro 4/3 sensor, it's because of the noise. If you had looked at the chart you'd have seen the camera can detect 14 stops of dynamic range, indicating the sensor is being read out at 13 bits. 14 bit readout sensors can detect up to 14.9 stops, hence why all the other cameras reach that ballpark. The GH5 was also capped heavily with it's VLOG-L and would only encode LOG at 9bit instead of 10bit severily limiting it's dynamic range, so it's something panasonic is known for doing. This is also the reason why SIGMA FP is capped at 12 stops since it only reads out in 12bits.
If the GH6 had one more bit (14bits total), even if it couldn't take advantage of it and simply read it as noise, it would help the noise reduction algorithm by a f- ton thus allowing you to lift the shadows more to reveal information there.
With good noise reduction this camera should do 12 stops easily.
So don't put it down for for it's sensor size since it can easily make up for it with good post work
Great video man. As someone who has both the FX3 and GH6, the GH6 holds it own in most of the same situations and is way better for handheld work. Well done man, nice video.
Thanks man! As someone who has an s5 ii x, there are definitely times when I go to that over the GH6, but then there are times we're I go to a GH6 over the S5 II X. It's using the right tool for the right job.
Also, THANK YOU for watching the video! I've been loving yours, so it's cool to see you watch mine!
@@jeremypope-levison721What scenarios do you switch cameras for?
At the size and price point compared to the wild range of codecs and frame rates available, I still feel my GH6 packs a punch. I was almost inclined to buy a 2nd one for interview stuff and B cam role. But GH5S colours are so similar that it does the job pretty well.
I 100% agree. I have two that I use and I absolutely love them both
Jeremy, although i do not shoot M4/3 any more (gone full frame) agreed of course it is not. done, not even close. Black Magic, Panasonic, Olympus (you know their new name), are all still in the game. I love, love, love my GH5 just not low light, self filming and auto focus that has all improved I understand.
Agreed! I've moved to full frame as one of my cameras, but I love my GH6s still
Great video and great content. I haven’t upgraded to the GH6 from my GH5 yet, but kind of waiting to see it they release a GH6s type camera. Something like the GH5s. Lower megapixel count for better low light performance , oversized multi-aspect m43 sensor for a slightly wider field of view, shallower depth of field, etc..
Also, from one creator to another, just a little advice. I know it takes a bit more time, but I think it’s a good idea to edit out your breathing sounds. It can be a little distracting. I have the same habit of talking then taking a deep breath, and it’s really comes out in the audio.
Anyways, great video and I agree with all your points.
Editing would take too long. He’s over compressing / limiting the signal too hard.
Ahhh... You are in the DFdub. Great to hear.
Yessir! Hit me up on insta. Let's connect
My gh5ii is still so good I haven't found a worthy upgrade, especially when I'm behind the camera. Talking head content is also beautiful from this camera
Yeah it's a great camera. I almost got it over a gh6, but decided on the gh6.
Ive never shot a gh body but i have the s5ii and an oly em5ii. I think there's a few issues - one Panasonic gets a bad rap in general. Your average newbie wanting a camera is deciding between a canon or sony because those are the popular brands. People are automatically distrustful of brands that are less popular. This is unfortunate, because they offer the best price/performance ratio on the market. Another issue is that consumers dont necessarily know what they want. They want a "pro" camera but don't put any thought into what a pro actually uses. Case in point - whens the last time youve sat down in a theater and watched a movie shot at f/1.4 with af locked on a character as they walk around and blurring out everything else in the scene for the whole movie? Yet that's what people think they need to make a cinematic video. Or whats the last professional movie you've seen shot at night with available light? But that's what they want their camera to do to be "pro." I got an s5ii because im not a working pro and wanted something with AF that could keep up with my toddler for home videos and use for my personal ethnography projects and also use for my photography. The gh6 produces excellent video in the right hands. The a7siii produces horrible footage in the wrong hands. Better to get a gh6 and invest the rest of your budget in audio and lighting than to think you need a high end sony to be a pro.
That's just a narrative that we need to fix as content creators. RUclips has spewed a narrative of what is "cinematic," so people think that's what they need to do. This creates people who just do the same thing over and over again. All I can do is make videos like this that try to change that narrative.
I purchased this camera for the same reason $1000 its too good to pass up, too many people get caught up in MFT and bad autofocus. Neither are a real problem. Even in low light ive just purchased the fastest lenses possible and added a speed booster to some EF glass. Glad you made the video
The AF isn't even that bad. It hunts sometimes for sure, but with the right lenses it can be usable.
But yeah, I agree. I use EF lenses as well and it's such a beast
Totally agree with you. I just did not want to add an extra piece with a speed booster, I know sigma (18 - something lens), canon, Olympus and Lumix have great lenses. Honest truth the auto focus I nailed 50% of the times & was auto shooting just wanted it to work more consistently so I moved on. I know you can tweet it and make it work probably every time. I just was not that patient after using my beloved GH5 for 3+ years. Still have it with an 7-14 lens with is a killer.
@@garfieldmtify i shoot mostly manual so it did not bother me much, yeah that 18-35 is gets some nice images, there ways around the speed booster for cheap
@@garfieldmtify Wait, are you saying that the AF on your GH5 is better than the AF on GH6? I see the opposite on mine.
Hey Jeremy. I recommend looking closely at any streaking issues and the red line of death (in slow mo). “The DP Journey” and Glenn Fricker reported these issues respectively.
I haven't had any of these issues. I've pushed this camera to it's limits too and I've only dealt with noise but otherwise no straking or red line of death. And I have two of them
And then there is the BGH1, something of an oddball. But a fun little box of a cam. You have to have an external monitor, but since I like to record ProRes on a Ninja, adding one as for monitoring was a natural. Takes some getting used to the menus and the function buttons. A great little package, even when fully built out with mattbox + monitor + external battery to power everything. As you say, as long as you are adding light anyway - which in most cases you should be - the dynamic range is more than adequate.
I've definitely been interested in those box style panasonic cinema cameras. I am tempted to rent the new z-cam MFT global shutter camera though. That thing looks insane
@@jeremypope-levison721 BGH1 is Netflix approved though
I'm a OM1 user, I can say m43 will die if they don't innovate newer ideas to separate itself from the competition. Another thing that would help is to doing something about those prices. It's on the higher side, closer to some high end APC sensor cameras will better capabilities.
I definitely agree about the pricing. The G9 II is almost the same price as an S5 II X with similar specs.
What innovations are you thinking they should do?
Internal NDs ou like Olympus; multi aspect sensor like gh5s; falsd color; SDI; internal Raw; create a more film color (like bm) in a update for all cameras.
I fricken love my GH5 set up and would LOVE to get the GH6 - it looks to be the ultimate camera to shoot sports as well. The only thing that makes me nervous with MFT is low light. That's why I bought a GH5s. I think the GH6s will be very popular with filmmakers.
Just bought an s1h but I literally used a gh5 for 6 years…. With the right lenses and a speed booster, you can get some really good looking shots.
GH6 is probably my favourite run and gun camera in my kit. I own two of them and they are easily the ones I reach for if I need to do any travel shoot where flight is involved. A two camera kit, all accessories, sound, and batteries to power it can fit in my carry on backpack. I run with the native glass and have the option to shoot from 24-200FF equivalent on lenses that weigh less than a single FF lens. Plus with a 1TB card in the GH6, I can run all day without worrying about media. And a simple V Mount battery and a clip that lets it sit on my pocket and I’m powered for all day as well. There’s not much that comes close.
I Panasonic releases a GH7 with nearly identical specs but with better autofocus and (fingers crossed) an internal ND system I 100% am long term bullish on M4/3
100% agree. Such a great camera for run and gun. The IBIS paired with the 12-35 and 35-100 is killer.
I hope they add dual native ISO and pdaf to a gh7. NDs would be a plus
@@jeremypope-levison721 If they add Dual Native ISO and PDAF I'm day one buying. They add ND and its my dream run and gun camera. It's almost close to perfect already.
Dreaming of a GH7 with internal eVND, improved algorithms with PDAF, along with open gate 6k 120P ….
Let me make it simple for you.
MFT is good for:
1. Very good internal stabilization (small sensor - easier to stab)
2. Cheap lenses (because of the smaller sensor size mft lenses are less complicated and can cost twice as less than full frame).
The downside?
Less resolution (yes lenses have their own resolution and shooting 6k on a lens that barely supports 4k is a waste of drive space).
Aperture. MFT will never allow to blur the bg like FF.
So choice is basically between convenience and beauty.
I agree with your sentiments. I often film corporate events with the GH6 and all interviews with S1H or S5mk2. When the GH7 arrives with PDAF I’ll upgrade.
Only thought for you is to listen to your video before publishing, you clearly had a cold when you filmed. I’ve uploaded vids too with mistakes in a bunch of times myself BTW😉
Nice to see someone still making videos about how great the GH6 is. I bought it as my first real camera when it was relatively new, so it holds a special place in my heart and it's nice to see people still advocating for it for a variety of work! Subbed, and hope to see more awesome content from you in my feed!
The GH6 is a fantastic camera that really outperforms its price tag. It punches way above its weight. The only real issue is the autofocus, which isn't great in scenes with a lot of fast movement. But apart from that, I have no major complaints about this camera.
Yeah the AF is an issue, but it's still somewhat usable. I still prefer to manual focus a lot of stuff, but event work I like the AF of the S5 II X. In the end, each job requires different tools
Bro the gh6 hangs in my lineup for sure. I have it as a standalone body and use it with a speed booster or native mft glass and it’s dope. I’ve been happy with lowlight shots and have rigged it out and PRR in 4:3 is awesome! These days my main cameras are the eva1 & s1h. Gh6 is my social media camera for the open gate shooting. Also the photos it takes are dope. The grain just makes it look so good. No complaints with the gh6 and it will hangout with me in my camera trio lineup. Great video bro!
Thanks man! It's definitely a beast. Obviously there are benefits to other cameras, but the GH6 still is alive and well!
But yeah the opengate feature is clutch man
I agree that the gh6 is an amazing camera. And that micro four thirds is NOT dead. But Gerald said if you want the “best” image, then micro four thirds is dead. And in that, I agree also. That doesn’t mean it’s a bad image, or a low quality image. Rather, full frame and aps-c has finally caught up, and our offering a “better” image quality then micro four thirds. In either case, micro four thirds is an amazing format, especially for video.
I think "best" is subjective though. Because there's a lot to compare. My whole thing is the recording options and resolution the GH6 offers, competes directly with full frame cameras
The fact that so few people speak about the AFC out of focus "bug" when using frame rates below 48fps (24/25/30) in 4K/C4K/5,7K shows the cameras doesn't sell well.
Panasonic never corrected this bug and they don't care. Between all my lenses (10-25mm, 25-50mm, 12-60mm etc) only my 25mm f1.4II works well with low frame rates.
Even in Open Gate 5.8K, the AF pulses much more than on the GH5. Also, the fine details are worse than on the GH5 in 4K/C4K because of the digital moiré filter, details look rougher when cropping. In 5,7K details are as good as on the GH5 4K but the IBIS takes a hit, and again almost no influencer speaks about the slight crop and worse IBIS in 5,7K ...
It's a shame because the colors are fantastic, much better than my GH5 in my opinion, even better than my G9II and S5II.
I am a M43 user.
I do not do much video. Mostly do short 30” clips. I do street photography so I’m photography centric. I love the small size and lightweight characteristics of the GX bodies and primes. The zooms are also relatively small and light.
M43 is more than adequate for my needs. Yes, the video features are rich. The GH6 doesn’t interest me. Olympus may be struggling. Panasonic M43 seems to be alive and well.
Mask On Nurse Marty (Ret)
Thanks for the reply! Good information to have!
The GH6 is an incredible camera and more than enough for most people. However it did have quite a few major issues out of the box like streaking, lower DR at low ISO values and of course the lack of reliable AF. What is exciting is the G9II pretty much fixed all of these issues. DR at base ISO is now better than most APSC cameras (barring XH2s, C70 and some other cameras) and even Canon FF cameras.
It is only half a stop behind the top of the line FF cameras. The streaking also seems to have been completely fixed and the AF is competitive with the very best.
I think Panasonic did a terrible job marketing it as what it is, a hybrid beast and instead leaned into the photography crowd, which there aren't many in the Panasonic camp.
If definitely been interested in the G9 II. I've heard the AF isn't as reliable as the S5 II X. But I've been tempted to pick on up as a b cam for photo
@@jeremypope-levison721 it is actually way more reliable than the S5iiX since it launched later and the sensor reads out much faster, meaning it can scan the sensor more frequently to confirm focus.
@Animalinfotainment and how is it also in low light? For example I shot an event recently for video at 4000 ISO?
I'm genuinely curious about the g9 ii. I've got a lot of mft glass that would be nice to use with it
@@jeremypope-levison721 it's on par with the GH6 in low light
@@Wildridefilms I will say that is one reason I love the s5 ii x. Having the dual native ISO is amazing. Shot an event on Saturday at 4000 ISO and it's super clean
Do you do freelance work in DFW? Our channel is based out of DFW and I’m running GH6s. They hold up in direct sun 110 degree Texas summer while our GoPros will be shutting off due to heat. If you do freelance work would like to keep you in mind for some of our bigger video shoots where we need help.
if this camera will decrease to the price same of the gh5. i will definetely get one. but to be honest we can find s5ii is below 2k$ in the market. a little more money you can have one.
GH5s are pretty static around $500. The s5 ii you can, but you have to pay extra for the RAW recording or higher than 1080p prores which makes it the X version
Still enjoy using my GH5 (bought 2nd hand dirt cheap - just about $500 last year) which indeed tick all boxes in my checklist. Even its said lousy AF is still good enough for my work, thus nothing much left to complain about. Even though MFT is really going to be a dead format in the future that wouldn't matter AT ALL to me. By that time I would have used my GH5 to death (therefore worth every dime spent). And I'll let me in the future decide which direction to go then...
In the end it's only about the RIGHT TOOL for the RIGHT JOB, and that's it.😃
Couldn't agree more. Lots of people jump to the latest and greatest camera, but you can still do crazy things with a GH5. That camera itself is a beast. But M43 isn't dead yet!
@@jeremypope-levison721 Just realized that I forgot the word "if" (MFT is going to be a dead format) in my original post, oops.😆
IMHO this format had deviated from its original direction - the compact & lightweight system with a lot of punch. Considering that today's flagship MFT cameras are about the same size & weight (and price) as FF counterparts simply negate its own format's advantage. Why pay as much for something less?
Bring back moderately - sized MFT camera with bell & whistles, and compact ones with lots of functions packed in. This is what I'm expecting for!😃
Great Video! The footage looks great, a little bit too much noise for my taste - but otherwise it looks top tier👌🏻 The thing is that today you can get an apsc camera for around the same price, thats gonna have prob better low light performance and better dynamic range, and many of the features of the GH6. For a few hundred bucks more you can get the Fuji xs20 new and that has basically the same video specs as the XH2s with 6.2k open gate recording. But I am sure it lacks some features of the GH6, so to each and their own. Cameras are just tools and we all value different things for ourselves🤘🏻
That "not" was too small, and I didn't notice it. 🤣
I have the gh6 and the s5ii, I love the gh6 for the 120 4k no crop. Most of the time I use it for B roll, but it is definitely alive
The s5 ii definitely is awesome and has its place. The GH6 is just a different beast
How is the autofocus on g6 as you didnt mention much about that? I have a gh5s and find it good in low light, never us the autofocus though as its terrible. Im considering buying the g6 but would really love an improvement in the gh5s AF if you could comment on that and did you say the low light isnt good?
The fact that the gh6 is 1,000 dollars used proves Gerald's point. Im sure if Panasonic actually sold it closer to tbe resale value, the line would literally have to be killed off. And its only a good deal in that unsustainable context (let alone how screwed over the seller must feel for losing 60% value in a year or less).
Good vid but that resale value tells me its dead.
I Agree with, I take videos with the Lumix gh6 wildlife and it is just perfect, especially in slow motion. Even in the dark!
I almost bought this camera recently because I found an incredible deal on eBay, but I was looking for a second camera to pair with my S5, and at the end of the day, low light capability is really important for the way I work, and so I just wound up buying a second S5 for even less money. But I’m sure the GH6 is incredible. And like the original s5, not to be overlooked.
I get that. For me that's why I have my s5 ii x but I also work a lot in controlled lighting scenarios so it's not a huge issue for me. But any lumix camera shouldn't be overlooked
@@jeremypope-levison721 I totally agree. I’m about to buy a used S1 H, because my S5 brings me moire every once in a while, which is incredibly annoying. But I love all of these Lumix cameras. Great creative tools. All of them.
M43 would be even more amazing on like an 8-12 MP sensor. Holy moly that would be amazing
True!
You mean like the GH5S?
I cut my teeth on the GH4/5/5s. Used a combination of M4/3 lenses and adapting canon EF glass. These cameras are tools and you can get incredible footage.
I think due to the accessibility of full frame cameras now it ends up being a bad spot for the M4/3 system to be in. You can but a cheap used FF Canon, Sony, and even LUMIX for less than the GH6 used.
And novices hear “full frame” without even knowing what it means and lose their minds.
Ultimately these are all tools. Me personally I don’t think I’ll go back to anything M4/3 mostly because it doesn’t suit my needs and isn’t the look I prefer in my footage.
Have you had issue with the streaking? Great video!!
The gh6 if you,are behind the camera its a beast, but if you want to use it alone for other type of video for RUclips like vlog or something like that is not so good because of the autofocus, but with the new g9ii that has phase detect autofocus then mft is more than alive.
I think people hate on the AF a bit too much. Paired with the right lens, the AF actually holds pretty well and with the AF limiter, it's even better. But it's definitely not as good as a G9 II
GH6 for life!
m43 is not dead, but manufacturers tries hard to kill own business:
- pany was focused on filmmakers cameras (quite small market) and recently released g9II that is nice camera, but 6 years people waited for an update! And most of us wish to see it in compact body, like GX.
- om all in for a wildlife (that is also quite small market), recent om announce is very disappointing.
- where is new compact but feature packed and powerful cameras we like m43 for? There is nothing.
- even from entry filmmakers position, where is vlogers / youtube content creators cameras? Nothing again. GH or even G9 is overkill, it should be compact and weather sealed.
I think manufacturers hear the wrong things and try to make a camera for everything and it ends up being good for one thing. It's never a given what's going to sell well. I hope they come out with an updated GH6 soon.
Do you have videos on GH6 rigs with monitors recorded to SSD? Also, what setting would you recommend for the internet distribution of a dramatic narrative film?
Got one and BRAW took it to a next level...no with DJI focus pro makes it a demi god
I just got the video assist myself! Looking to test it out soon. I'm stoked to see how it works. So far the s5 ii x is better with the video assist image wise so I can't wait to see the GH6
dude, set up looks mint!
Thanks bro!
Can you actually shoot raw internally and/or directly to an SSD through USB?
To an external monitor. Either Atomos Ninja V with ProRes RAW, or the blackmagic video assist with BRAW. But you can shoot prores 422 through USB to SSD.
I love my Gh6 rig, get a good cinema lense, good to go.
Yeah man! Working on building up my cinema lens set
A lot of the people that have those absurd opinions on mft aren’t even “filmmakers”
I mean that's true. But the narrative is still out there and younger filmmakers hear that and are deterred
Do you experience any of the streaking issues seen in the GH6?
I have a few times, in very low light, high ISO. But very rarely. I think maybe 3-5 times in 2 years.
Do you experience that with other cameras?@@jeremypope-levison721
Great video, i enjoyed it
Glad you enjoyed it, thanks for the watch!
Great video dude!
Thanks my dude!
Been shooting on a GH7 since covid. Sorry, I'm not splurging for the FFs.
No need in my opinion. The GH6 does a great jon
F gerry...ita an amazing camera..even the gh5s is amazing
100% agree
M43 is dead to me. The OM-1 was so disappointing and the OM-1 1/2 has been discounted so quickly that I predict we won't have any new products released in 2025.
Everyone thought 4/3 format would last forever, remember?
It’s definitely dead. Better sell me all those lenses.
🤣🤣🤣
😂
your monitor is flickering. i think you need to make it 1 step down. hehehe
I have removed the monitor since then but yes I realized that afterwards
@@jeremypope-levison721 cool but nice video by the way
Jerald has opinion, that is not where he gets monies ! Understand he's not in Pro-photography or Movies or Prosound ! He needs business !
🔥💣💥
It is soooooo dead!!!!!
It is and what a waste of money