170+ LSAT Logical Reasoning Strategy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 14

  • @jisungjung4883
    @jisungjung4883 5 лет назад +17

    these are some of the best videos on lsat i've seen thus far, thanks!

    • @UnpluggedPrep
      @UnpluggedPrep  5 лет назад +1

      That's so nice of you to say, Jisung - I appreciate it!

  • @maryaffee354
    @maryaffee354 3 года назад +4

    amazing-super helpful! THANK YOU

  • @IsabellaLouis414
    @IsabellaLouis414 4 года назад +5

    These are so helpful!!! Thank u!

  • @theodorerosenbear
    @theodorerosenbear 3 года назад +1

    Love the videos. Very thankful for them!

  • @hyojinlee
    @hyojinlee 4 года назад +2

    Thank you so much for this video!

  • @chrisstavrulakis3215
    @chrisstavrulakis3215 2 года назад +10

    Honestly, this video was pretty confusing. I didn't take much from it.

  • @allysanhelgracerebolanan2387
    @allysanhelgracerebolanan2387 3 года назад +2

    THANK YOU SO MUCH!!

  • @jameszelaznysr5179
    @jameszelaznysr5179 4 года назад +4

    The best logical reasoning is just tell the damn truth. On whatever subject.☺

  • @jonathanvega5604
    @jonathanvega5604 5 лет назад +2

    GREATNESS!

  • @chenesaimoyo8983
    @chenesaimoyo8983 5 лет назад +2

    Wowww

  • @tobysmith2081
    @tobysmith2081 2 года назад

    "However, we should not eat there"
    A) "Yelp is bias"
    You see how your answer choice doesn't explain why we should exclude the restaurant, as stated in the stimulus? It explains why the we shouldnt use Yelp, but that's only 1/2 of the necessary answer. What if it's the only restaurant in the city? I don't think this would pass as an LSAT answer

  • @jeremiahc5176
    @jeremiahc5176 3 года назад +13

    I feel as though you're doing to much in your explanations in terms of trying too hard with big terms which ultimately makes your assessments / explanations confusing for many. Be more simplistic in your articulations next time.

    • @t.morgan9244
      @t.morgan9244 3 года назад +3

      Agreed. The use of the word negate. Why, when you can easily say abolish, or strike down. The test is already convoluted, the instructions on how to take the test should not be. Plain English matters. Contra positive is another offender! Not mentioned, but the term should be a crime! The LSAT is learnable, but not with convoluted instructions. With consistent practice, it actually becomes so obvious!