Adidas have actually mentioned this to big retailers in product training calls, when telling us about Predator Accuracy and changes to the Adidas X. The change comes from feedback from professionals saying it wasn’t as comfortable, so they just changed from the carbitex. Still just as light tho
I love Adidas, but when i saw pictures of the whiteout (which was white in the sole) i thought it was a fake colorway because the soleplate was missing the carbitex insert I am a leather boot guy, so was not interested in these, but i do have prototype Ghosteds and have to say, the boots only saving grace is that carbon fiber plate. Adidas needs to come out with a press release on this matter
I stand by that it's the best soleplate of all time. Didn't particularly enjoy how uncomfortable the upper was but man the soleplate made me feel absolutely rapid.
@@DecoDoesYT it is very unique! Nothing feels like it! Myself, i am more partial to the TRX plates on the Pred Pulse-Adipower, but i thoroughly enjoyed the Ghosted/Speedflow plate
@@Akshai-wn7ji takes the exact shape of your foot, custom fit, so ultimate comfort. Great soft touch that no synthetic can replicate. Stays cool in heat and keeps you warmer in cold. But really the best thing is the comfort from the perfect fit and softness of the material
@@nikolamaslarevic918 crazy concept: people don’t like giving money to companies and being tricked/led a stray. it doesn’t matter whether it makes a difference or not it’s shady business tactics that’s my point, not respectable at all by adidas.
It's honestly always been strange to me that adidas contracted Carbitex to make the carbon soleplates when they make a perfectly good (great even, according to some reviewers) carbon soleplate for their top-end marathon racing shoes. I imagine the 2 plates probably would have different designs/engineering, but I mean, come on adidas....
Bubbles is a strange word for this, and I know exactly what you mean. To me, it seems this is might be a result of the production process of the plates.
Although it is crazy that Adidas is doing this, the product description of the new colours does sort of indicate the lack of the Carbitex inserts. In the description of the older colours, it mentions the Carbitex insert, however, in the new colours it doesn't. So Adidas isn't as much lying or tricking consumers about this but instead not informing them about the removal. I just want to make myself clear: I still think this is crazy and shameful for Adidas and I am not supporting this, just thought it would be important to mention this.
Of course! They’re not hiding the change. It’s clear to see in product images, but not a actively making an attempt to let consumers know that they’ve taken away one of the boot’s flagship technologies is shady. It’s effectively a downgrade that many will unknowingly purchase. They’re not hiding the change, but they’re certainly not making an effort to inform people of it.
I’m adidas threw and threw but this feels like a kick in the teeth from them. Honest and open review hence why this is the best boot review channel going. Well played mate
Hot take: Adidas carbon fiber sole looked like fake carbon fiber when i checked it out in person, the CF had wrinkles too if that even means anything. Definitely didn't compare to the carbon fiber sole i saw on the mercurial superfly 4's, which had fantastic carbon soles (that didn't last long). P.S. superfly 4's imo are better than the superfly 9's.
The wrinkles appear to be a manufacturing defect on all copies, but it is genuine carbon fiber, if u ever deltoid with carbon is cars, or other items, they are identical. Also the nike carbon fiber had a different checkered weave, while the adidas is the more common carbon weave.
My son has the new ones and the old ones. Without the cf they are a little more flexible unfortunately. But if you want the fresh new colors what are you gonna do. My son prefers these over any other top cost kids boots so idgaf😂
Carbon Fiber is supposed to be better for energy return. It isn't just stiffer. The marketing on it was that its light stiff and the spring back is better. Other companies have tried to incorporate carbon fiber into the sole plate. It is expensive and they weren't very durable. I snapped my old superflys that had a carbon fiber sole plate. So if it costs more and is less durable its a double loss for the company. So yeah...long story short this is kind of messed up by adidas. Especially to not at least drop the price by a small amount.
Not the first time they scapegoat the "Pros" in order to excuse controversial changes. They could have just made it like 5 dollars cheaper and people would have been ok with it.
Vinyl sticker? What are you talking about? Have you had these in hand? It simply is no sticker (which would have been 'removed' in countless videos I am sure). There’s nothing to 'think' about what the insert was. It was a Carbitex insert-it is a very simple and obvious fact.
@@pulsefg True, silly comment on my end. Same with the weighted metal element on the predator edge, it was removed and weighed. The X-Ray on the Speedflow tooling carbitex insert was a clearer for all to see. I wonder what the reason for removing the insert was..
Hey Josh did you see the kicker for the Chiefs scored the game winning field goal with a Mercurial on the right and some Adizero cleat on the other? Random but as a football boot fan thought it was pretty interesting. He was wearing grip socks too 😅
The carbon fiber plates made my feet sore for weeks on end. Never putting those on my feet again. It could have been the cut of the boot, but I really don't think any boot should be that stiff at the bottom like that. Even the new copa pures were a little stiff out of box but those wore down and are extremely flexible from the sole plate being a normal plastic, which I prefer. I get the idea of carbon fiber acting as a spring but you should leave that job to your calves and sprinting technique. The perfect boot should match your foot shape as close as possible and allow your feet to live up to their full potential. Toes should be able to spread/ rest evenly and not be crunched so you can have full power in sprinting (yes a boot should be a tad snug but if your toes cant rest like they do on flat ground then you are going to be damaging your foot potentially). I think that's what Adidas was trying to get at with this boot. The toe box is massive and I was on my toes 24/7, especially due to the raised nature of the front of the boot. While they are nice to sprint in, just walking and jogging across the field grew uncomfortable and the soreness would just not stop. If this boot had a little more flex and fit my foot shape better then I'd totally continue to rock them. I love the material and the touch on them is absolutely absurd, but I just cant do it with the current model. Had to go for the copa pures and I love them!
I would like to think they had some sort of problem with the company that makes the carbon fiber plate. Doesn't justify it but it would at least be a reason for it
Im sorry Josh, but if you know Carbon fiber that doesnt look anything like the real deal. Plus the CF foil even lifts up on the sides of the insert of the green colorway. With the car you own this should be apparent to you too.
The plates have always been carbon. The top layer, like many carbon products, is effectively just a cosmetic layer to show a perfect carbon weave. The quality of that finishing clearly got worse with the Speedportal, but again, the actual plate is actually carbon.
hey , what does your statement "true to size" means? Does it means that the fit of that articular 10.5 cleat will be like a typical 10.5 cleat or does it mean that it would also be like a 10.5 sneaker? This is my first buying according to us sizes and before that i was wearing sneaker in india with size 9 which is according to UK size but when i came to canada i saw that us sizes differ. So , now my sneakers from india has a us 10 mentioned on it and i tried Air force in 10.5 which fit me good and i bought NIKE PHANTOM GX ACADEMY in 10.5 and they were tight my fingers were pushed to the very front of the shoe. Now i returned it and it will take 13 days for processing which is alot. So i donot want to do it again. And also should i go for mercurial dream speed 6 CR7 academy the new one which just dropped today in elites but i want the academy which will come soon or should i go for phantom gx academy in a bigger size and please guide me on size and True to size meaning in detail beacuse i do not want any confusion again. Thanks
It means that you should get your usual size. Saying that a shoe fits “true to size” means that if you wear size 10 in other shoes, you should also buy that shoe in size 10. US and UK shoe sizes are different, so you gotta compare your country's size system vs. US or UK, depending on where are you buying the shoe.
Wouldn’t have hurt a single their own ego have they just inform about the removal of carbitex and the way they try to say it’s a because of a “pro feedback” is comical.
Hey Josh, I'm looking for a new pair of boots. I'm currently playing as a wing/full back. I stumbled upon the phantom gt2 for about 170$, I know that you are not a big fan of them. Would you suggest me to buy them, or do you got other advices ?
That’s a very average deal on a boot that’s honestly not that good. You can get much better deals and better boots for less money. $175 for GTs is not worth it. Don’t waste your money. Plus.. you can get them for way cheaper anyways if you really want them, $175 is not a deal lol
Football boot conspiracy here... What if Adidas are trying to recuperate the costs from their split with Ye over the Yeezy line of products??? It is estimated Adidas will loose out on almost half of a billion dollars in revenue from the split and they are finding small ways to get some of that money back
I'm not quite sure if the carbon fiber was replaced, but I'm sure that what we can see in the green color way from the outside it's a sticker pretending to be where the piece of the carbon fiber is, the piece is inside
@Thomas I have, and I also see in reviews and stores to check out the theory, and it's a sticker... check out more videos and take off the insole, and you'll notice the piece in the inside
@@efrainvalenciacamacho235 It’s not ;) Of course, the piece is inside - where else should it be? Parts of it, with some protective finish, are visible from the outside. Carbitex is not some kind of magic, it’s a flexible composite material. These plates are not that ugly that adidas must use something to cover them.
Damn i see the video first now. I love adidas very much. I play With f50 4year i play with 17.1 and 18.1 all of them was very Nice. But i buy adidas x speedportal this is a very bad, dont buy this shoes. I Will return them back to unisport. The material is not the same like f50 and 17.1 18.1
The idea of passing the assumed savings to customers is simply crazy. What company would do such a thing? I honestly think us customers should not feel entitled to anything.
So take away one the flagship technologies of the top end model and charge the same price? They’re one step closer to the takedown version which retails for significantly less. I wouldn’t call that entitlement, that’s being tricked.
@@Soccerreviewsforyou Fair point! Especially since many online retailers won’t change the product description when putting the new colors on their site. In the long term, though, this carbon composite would have gone away anyway at some point-and probably not for the worse.
@@Soccerreviewsforyou Having thought more about this: I think the problem is the use of the term 'technology'. A sole plate is a sole plate is a sole plate … And the one on the top end model is still better than the one on the takedowns, just like with any other silo that does not use carbon in 2023. The Speedportal did not cost 300 dollars because of the Carbitex insert.
@@pulsefg Expecting something you pay a premium price for is not entitlement. When you buy a top end model, you expect to receive the best of what that company has to offer at the time and what they’re advertising. Adidas has advertised the speedportal for its upper and carbon plated soleplate for speed and responsiveness. Them randomly switching things up and not really making customers aware is shady and sneaky. A company doesn’t have to pass on its cost cutting decisions on to its customers, but they should make them aware of the change. That’s just normal business practice.
football boots can’t make you play better but they can definitely make you play worse
1000x agree. I think it’s mental more so than anything else
Just like haaland in X speedportal in community shield
Football Boots can actually make you play better.
actually football boots prevent you from falling on the field because they have spikes under them so think before you comment
@@Cr7_g0at1 lil bro really thought he did something there
Adidas have actually mentioned this to big retailers in product training calls, when telling us about Predator Accuracy and changes to the Adidas X. The change comes from feedback from professionals saying it wasn’t as comfortable, so they just changed from the carbitex. Still just as light tho
just because short of supply of the carbitex ,the pro edition still have it
Yeah right. I don't believe them
The big Companys doing everything to make more profit 🤒
I love Adidas, but when i saw pictures of the whiteout (which was white in the sole) i thought it was a fake colorway because the soleplate was missing the carbitex insert
I am a leather boot guy, so was not interested in these, but i do have prototype Ghosteds and have to say, the boots only saving grace is that carbon fiber plate.
Adidas needs to come out with a press release on this matter
I stand by that it's the best soleplate of all time. Didn't particularly enjoy how uncomfortable the upper was but man the soleplate made me feel absolutely rapid.
@@DecoDoesYT it is very unique! Nothing feels like it! Myself, i am more partial to the TRX plates on the Pred Pulse-Adipower, but i thoroughly enjoyed the Ghosted/Speedflow plate
Can u pls tell me what is special about leather boots....i have never used them.
@@Akshai-wn7ji takes the exact shape of your foot, custom fit, so ultimate comfort. Great soft touch that no synthetic can replicate. Stays cool in heat and keeps you warmer in cold. But really the best thing is the comfort from the perfect fit and softness of the material
@@JonathanRodriguez-nz9nw how about the durability...do they last longer ??
thats honestly so scummy tbh, cmon adidas yall need to do better :(. thank you for spreading awareness about this josh.
ur acting like it makes a difference lol
@@nikolamaslarevic918 crazy concept: people don’t like giving money to companies and being tricked/led a stray. it doesn’t matter whether it makes a difference or not it’s shady business tactics that’s my point, not respectable at all by adidas.
Really love the content. Thank you for everything Josh , big hug from 🇲🇽😘
Viva Mexico cabrones
Vamos México
It's honestly always been strange to me that adidas contracted Carbitex to make the carbon soleplates when they make a perfectly good (great even, according to some reviewers) carbon soleplate for their top-end marathon racing shoes.
I imagine the 2 plates probably would have different designs/engineering, but I mean, come on adidas....
Has anyone ever seen the carbotex insert that they were using because every pair of these boots I've ever seen has bubbles and it looks like a sticker
Yes! I had noticed that also. Looks like there may be more to this than meets the eye. Very shady indeed.
Bubbles is a strange word for this, and I know exactly what you mean. To me, it seems this is might be a result of the production process of the plates.
Yup it look like the foil peeled from the sides on the ones I've seen too
@@Deehydrate Foil? On the bottom of football boots?
I thought the topic was going to be about the AG stud pattern not being that different. Big surprise here!
Although it is crazy that Adidas is doing this, the product description of the new colours does sort of indicate the lack of the Carbitex inserts. In the description of the older colours, it mentions the Carbitex insert, however, in the new colours it doesn't. So Adidas isn't as much lying or tricking consumers about this but instead not informing them about the removal. I just want to make myself clear: I still think this is crazy and shameful for Adidas and I am not supporting this, just thought it would be important to mention this.
Of course! They’re not hiding the change. It’s clear to see in product images, but not a actively making an attempt to let consumers know that they’ve taken away one of the boot’s flagship technologies is shady. It’s effectively a downgrade that many will unknowingly purchase. They’re not hiding the change, but they’re certainly not making an effort to inform people of it.
it was not important to mention this. its all the same
@@diegochu7594 It was even less important for you to reply
@@hugolamarche712 so you do know
Very suspicious it would happen mid life cycle of the product. If it's the preference of endorsed players why not list that as a feature.
W review. Your goated bro , because this is truly information one needs to know !
I’m adidas threw and threw but this feels like a kick in the teeth from them. Honest and open review hence why this is the best boot review channel going. Well played mate
what are you throwing?
Hot take: Adidas carbon fiber sole looked like fake carbon fiber when i checked it out in person, the CF had wrinkles too if that even means anything.
Definitely didn't compare to the carbon fiber sole i saw on the mercurial superfly 4's, which had fantastic carbon soles (that didn't last long). P.S. superfly 4's imo are better than the superfly 9's.
The wrinkles appear to be a manufacturing defect on all copies, but it is genuine carbon fiber, if u ever deltoid with carbon is cars, or other items, they are identical. Also the nike carbon fiber had a different checkered weave, while the adidas is the more common carbon weave.
I honestly prefer the plastic. The carbon fiber was too stiff imo
The pastic inserts are statically better i heard for running and snap back on the sole plate of the shoe
I am swapping to nike, been with adidas for 18 years other than 1 pair of hypervenoms. Shameless stuff recently.
We want Joma, Lotto and Munich futsal shoes reviews
That would be nice
There all shit, hope that helps
@@rikkishields2352 you don't know what you are talking about. That's what pro futsal players play with
They sell 10s of pairs in North America.
@@sdot5389 ?
Just checked the New X.1 on the UK site and it actually costs £20 MORE than the older WC Pack colourway still available 🥴🥴🥴
Actually, I think the carbon insert is inside the boot beneath the insert. That carbon looking strip in the bottom is just a sticker.
To me, the amazing thing is that they removed the plate a few months after making the window bigger.
I knew you will do this video. Love that
Please make a review on Charly pfx cleats .. Gignacs sponsor 0:39 ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
if you’re gonna take out the carbitex, at least lower the price and tell people
Are you planning to review UnoZero boots at some point? I would like to hear your thoughts on them.
Josh can y make a review on imotana boots? i cant find any review on em but the idea of customizable sizing seems kinda cool
My son has the new ones and the old ones. Without the cf they are a little more flexible unfortunately. But if you want the fresh new colors what are you gonna do. My son prefers these over any other top cost kids boots so idgaf😂
Can you please do a review on the academy Vapor 15 and superfly 9?
ruclips.net/video/e_xXFjmttWU/видео.html
Carbon Fiber is supposed to be better for energy return. It isn't just stiffer. The marketing on it was that its light stiff and the spring back is better. Other companies have tried to incorporate carbon fiber into the sole plate. It is expensive and they weren't very durable. I snapped my old superflys that had a carbon fiber sole plate. So if it costs more and is less durable its a double loss for the company. So yeah...long story short this is kind of messed up by adidas. Especially to not at least drop the price by a small amount.
I mean y’all really thought it was carbon fiber? To me it looked like it was just a sticker.
Went to a soccer shop and tried on vapors and these and the speed portals were just so uncomfortable smh they needa do sum different
Mizuno alpha elite review coming soon? 👀
Nike did the same thing with ACC years ago 😂
Adidas needs to recall the old ones, they’re so uncomfortable 🤷🏽♂️
They actually took away the only tech that made sense.
The new color way in the XSpeedportal are worth and expensive for less technologies.
They took a great boot in the Speedflow +, and basically ruined it.
cut open an old pair to see if they even used carbon before :D many people say its possible that they didnt use it.
Not the first time they scapegoat the "Pros" in order to excuse controversial changes.
They could have just made it like 5 dollars cheaper and people would have been ok with it.
Could you be the first to review the new Iniesta brand football boots called Capitten?
They seem great at the first sight and at acceptable prices
I don’t think it was Carbon Fibre in the first place, you can see the vinyl sticker coming apart even when brand new..
Vinyl sticker? What are you talking about? Have you had these in hand? It simply is no sticker (which would have been 'removed' in countless videos I am sure). There’s nothing to 'think' about what the insert was. It was a Carbitex insert-it is a very simple and obvious fact.
@@pulsefg True, silly comment on my end. Same with the weighted metal element on the predator edge, it was removed and weighed. The X-Ray on the Speedflow tooling carbitex insert was a clearer for all to see. I wonder what the reason for removing the insert was..
So Mizuno morelia neo II, III & Beta still worth it & comfortable boots until now??
What you think about speedportal+ or phantom gx? What’s better you think?
Does this apply to the Al rihla pack as well? I just got a pair a couple days ago
Jimothy are you going to review the brand new Diadora Veloce SL?
Can those boots be worn on Ag and Fg?
Hey Josh did you see the kicker for the Chiefs scored the game winning field goal with a Mercurial on the right and some Adizero cleat on the other? Random but as a football boot fan thought it was pretty interesting. He was wearing grip socks too 😅
Thanks for the video to the best boot reviewer on youtube
Love the color but just not worth the price.
The carbon fiber plates made my feet sore for weeks on end. Never putting those on my feet again. It could have been the cut of the boot, but I really don't think any boot should be that stiff at the bottom like that. Even the new copa pures were a little stiff out of box but those wore down and are extremely flexible from the sole plate being a normal plastic, which I prefer. I get the idea of carbon fiber acting as a spring but you should leave that job to your calves and sprinting technique. The perfect boot should match your foot shape as close as possible and allow your feet to live up to their full potential. Toes should be able to spread/ rest evenly and not be crunched so you can have full power in sprinting (yes a boot should be a tad snug but if your toes cant rest like they do on flat ground then you are going to be damaging your foot potentially). I think that's what Adidas was trying to get at with this boot. The toe box is massive and I was on my toes 24/7, especially due to the raised nature of the front of the boot. While they are nice to sprint in, just walking and jogging across the field grew uncomfortable and the soreness would just not stop. If this boot had a little more flex and fit my foot shape better then I'd totally continue to rock them. I love the material and the touch on them is absolutely absurd, but I just cant do it with the current model. Had to go for the copa pures and I love them!
In Adidas's defense, the insert is not listed as tech for this boot on their site currently...🤷
Should have told people, and price should have dropped
What the hell? This is ridiculous!
Can you imagine how much money they get without the need to pay for carbitex??
best turfsssss pls... still waiting :(
it’s more comfy the carbon fiber hurts my foot😂
Another reason I just don't buy adidas
Well it’s better than Nike 😂
Bought these and they felt so bad. Instant refund.
I would like to think they had some sort of problem with the company that makes the carbon fiber plate. Doesn't justify it but it would at least be a reason for it
Wow adidas is a SCAMMM 😢
they said that it would change tho
Im sorry Josh, but if you know Carbon fiber that doesnt look anything like the real deal. Plus the CF foil even lifts up on the sides of the insert of the green colorway. With the car you own this should be apparent to you too.
The plates have always been carbon. The top layer, like many carbon products, is effectively just a cosmetic layer to show a perfect carbon weave. The quality of that finishing clearly got worse with the Speedportal, but again, the actual plate is actually carbon.
hey , what does your statement "true to size" means? Does it means that the fit of that articular 10.5 cleat will be like a typical 10.5 cleat or does it mean that it would also be like a 10.5 sneaker? This is my first buying according to us sizes and before that i was wearing sneaker in india with size 9 which is according to UK size but when i came to canada i saw that us sizes differ. So , now my sneakers from india has a us 10 mentioned on it and i tried Air force in 10.5 which fit me good and i bought NIKE PHANTOM GX ACADEMY in 10.5 and they were tight my fingers were pushed to the very front of the shoe. Now i returned it and it will take 13 days for processing which is alot. So i donot want to do it again. And also should i go for mercurial dream speed 6 CR7 academy the new one which just dropped today in elites but i want the academy which will come soon or should i go for phantom gx academy in a bigger size and please guide me on size and True to size meaning in detail beacuse i do not want any confusion again. Thanks
It means that you should get your usual size.
Saying that a shoe fits “true to size” means that if you wear size 10 in other shoes, you should also buy that shoe in size 10.
US and UK shoe sizes are different, so you gotta compare your country's size system vs. US or UK, depending on where are you buying the shoe.
tiempo legend 9 academy or mercurial vapor 15 academy
Wouldn’t have hurt a single their own ego have they just inform about the removal of carbitex and the way they try to say it’s a because of a “pro feedback” is comical.
I guess it’s now time to try out decent speeds boots. Thanks adidas for helping make my decision easier and save some more money
damn I was about to order these too
Yea , nah bruh they stiff asl and even more narrow and u gotta chnage ur size it’s just not worth it at all
@@koltzsevere1047 size bigger or smaller?
What do you think about the predator accuracy .2? Does ir even compete with other takedowns models like the tiempos pro or even puma future 2.4?
Hey Josh, I'm looking for a new pair of boots. I'm currently playing as a wing/full back. I stumbled upon the phantom gt2 for about 170$, I know that you are not a big fan of them. Would you suggest me to buy them, or do you got other advices ?
Josh: If it’s elite model,from value for money perspective, definitely go for it.
That’s a very average deal on a boot that’s honestly not that good. You can get much better deals and better boots for less money. $175 for GTs is not worth it. Don’t waste your money. Plus.. you can get them for way cheaper anyways if you really want them, $175 is not a deal lol
my guess, since adidas is losing hundreds of millions from their split from kanye west, maybe they're cutting corners to make up for their loss
You should cut a pair open or colab with what's inside to see if it was ever really carbon fiber in the first place
Football boot conspiracy here... What if Adidas are trying to recuperate the costs from their split with Ye over the Yeezy line of products??? It is estimated Adidas will loose out on almost half of a billion dollars in revenue from the split and they are finding small ways to get some of that money back
well, Nike doesn't keep any fucking inventory and is high on their limited releases, so what the hell else are we going to buy?!!?!?!?!?!?!
Copa sense 😂
@@abaslzg7338 our brother might as well stop reviewing Nike since they are always out of inventory on their new releases
You got new balance and puma to choose from
Lots of retailers will gladly sell you the Nike releases …
@@pulsefg they can't get them. Nike is making everything limited and they sell out within hours or days
Looks like a carbon fibre look sticker 😂
Are those made in china ?
In the latest white and black x + and .1 stills have the stickers of carbon fiber
No
Adidas is making bad boots last couple years. Love them but nike and other brands are running away in the better direction
The new Copas and Preds are actually amazing!
@@Soccerreviewsforyou I trust you :)
is it me or adidas is going down hill with thier football boots
They need to make the money they are losing cause of the deal with Kanye back somehow
I'm not quite sure if the carbon fiber was replaced, but I'm sure that what we can see in the green color way from the outside it's a sticker pretending to be where the piece of the carbon fiber is, the piece is inside
What makes you think it’s a sticker? Have you looked at actual Carbitex plates?
@Thomas I have, and I also see in reviews and stores to check out the theory, and it's a sticker... check out more videos and take off the insole, and you'll notice the piece in the inside
@@efrainvalenciacamacho235 It’s not ;) Of course, the piece is inside - where else should it be? Parts of it, with some protective finish, are visible from the outside. Carbitex is not some kind of magic, it’s a flexible composite material. These plates are not that ugly that adidas must use something to cover them.
Damn i see the video first now. I love adidas very much. I play With f50 4year i play with 17.1 and 18.1 all of them was very Nice. But i buy adidas x speedportal this is a very bad, dont buy this shoes. I Will return them back to unisport. The material is not the same like f50 and 17.1 18.1
I buy Adidas x speedportal 1. I dont no how the new generation is. Bu speedportal 1 stay away from this shoes its not good.
Goodbye greedy adidas, say hello to Nike, Puma, Mizuno and New Balance.
The idea of passing the assumed savings to customers is simply crazy. What company would do such a thing? I honestly think us customers should not feel entitled to anything.
So take away one the flagship technologies of the top end model and charge the same price? They’re one step closer to the takedown version which retails for significantly less. I wouldn’t call that entitlement, that’s being tricked.
@@Soccerreviewsforyou Fair point! Especially since many online retailers won’t change the product description when putting the new colors on their site. In the long term, though, this carbon composite would have gone away anyway at some point-and probably not for the worse.
Also: long-term (as in: since 2014) viewer here-and fellow fan of the T90 Laser boots!
@@Soccerreviewsforyou Having thought more about this: I think the problem is the use of the term 'technology'. A sole plate is a sole plate is a sole plate … And the one on the top end model is still better than the one on the takedowns, just like with any other silo that does not use carbon in 2023. The Speedportal did not cost 300 dollars because of the Carbitex insert.
@@pulsefg Expecting something you pay a premium price for is not entitlement. When you buy a top end model, you expect to receive the best of what that company has to offer at the time and what they’re advertising. Adidas has advertised the speedportal for its upper and carbon plated soleplate for speed and responsiveness. Them randomly switching things up and not really making customers aware is shady and sneaky.
A company doesn’t have to pass on its cost cutting decisions on to its customers, but they should make them aware of the change. That’s just normal business practice.
First.
second hehe