I tend to side with Anthony. Like Russell Wilson in Denver, they will stick with Jones and bench him later in the season, if at all. They will coach to try and win and end up around the same draft position as last year. So New England, Jacksonville, New Orleans, Carolina, Cleveland, and Vegas (three of them will take quarterbacks; Carolina might) will be ahead in the draft. So, a Jaxson Dart will be the best the draft will have to offer when the Giants are on the clock. So what could they do? Try to convince who's ahead that won't take a quarterback to trade down? Joe Schoen better pray that 1, 2, and 3 are not quarterback-needy teams. Even then are Sanders, Ward, or Ewers their guy? Is it worth trading away assets for those guys? It would be out of desperation if not.
Agree with Baddog - if we lose and want to bench DJ, its best to justify it as trying to shake things up and avoid the insanity of doing the same thing over and over again. EVERYONE will know the real reason is the injury guarantee, but Daboll could sell it this way. Of course, win/loss is not the only issue. DJ could throw for 5 TDs and run for a 6th, but we lose 45-42 because the defense plays horribly. Then it would MUCH tougher to bench DJ. Or, conversely, we win 3 - 0. DJ throws 4 picks. We'd still want to bench him after only scoring 3 points in a horrible showing, but do we do that after a victory? Yes, of course! It sucks because DJ really does have talent. But his deficiencies and inconsistency just aren't improving.
If we win we give daniel jones hope on staying on the team.
I tend to side with Anthony. Like Russell Wilson in Denver, they will stick with Jones and bench him later in the season, if at all.
They will coach to try and win and end up around the same draft position as last year. So New England, Jacksonville, New Orleans, Carolina, Cleveland, and Vegas (three of them will take quarterbacks; Carolina might) will be ahead in the draft. So, a Jaxson Dart will be the best the draft will have to offer when the Giants are on the clock.
So what could they do? Try to convince who's ahead that won't take a quarterback to trade down? Joe Schoen better pray that 1, 2, and 3 are not quarterback-needy teams.
Even then are Sanders, Ward, or Ewers their guy? Is it worth trading away assets for those guys? It would be out of desperation if not.
Agree with Baddog - if we lose and want to bench DJ, its best to justify it as trying to shake things up and avoid the insanity of doing the same thing over and over again. EVERYONE will know the real reason is the injury guarantee, but Daboll could sell it this way.
Of course, win/loss is not the only issue. DJ could throw for 5 TDs and run for a 6th, but we lose 45-42 because the defense plays horribly. Then it would MUCH tougher to bench DJ. Or, conversely, we win 3 - 0. DJ throws 4 picks. We'd still want to bench him after only scoring 3 points in a horrible showing, but do we do that after a victory? Yes, of course!
It sucks because DJ really does have talent. But his deficiencies and inconsistency just aren't improving.
It would take jones 3 games to get 45 points.
No it doesn’t suck ad he had very limited talent and needs to go
Can any of you tell me 3 games that DJ LOST?
I disagree. Jones is not the problem.