Hey guys, if you enjoyed this video, please consider supporting me and my channel by liking and subscribing. If you want to contribute to help me continue to make more videos and improve the quality of my content, You can send a donation via: ➡paypal.me/syfetalk
@namakubento9276, you are a devil 😈 Allah ( swbt) speak with sound and letters and if Allah( swbt) didn't speak with sound and letters then how did Gabriel angel hear the quran....
2ndary evidences like the bibIe or other kalam will have mix of truth & faIsehood and has to agree with Quran to be valid and relevant to be used properly. This is why ppl should study Islam first. Ibn Kathir shows a proper example of this is his tafsir which is the likely the most popular tafsir in the world of how to use ilmul kalam properly. I think it was for ayat Quran 23.91. --- What contradicts Quran & sunna is rejected. These are the 1st 2 evidences in Islam. The 3rd is ijm3 or consensus of the scholars starting with the sahabas. These 3 are binding & used in Aqida or creed belief which even **the avg. Muslim SHOULD know.** Proof for this is hadith where Muawiya got mad & struk his sIave and then felt bad. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessing be upon him was told & also feIt bad. He asked her where is Allah & who am I? She said Fi Sam3 or above the Heavens & you are His Rasul. Prophet Muhammad peace & blessing be on him said free her she is a believer. In another hadith it said she was mute & and pointed up & did other signals. The 4th evidence is qiyas or analogy based on how much an imam studied the text - This is more for fiq or physical worship. as long as it doesn't contradict the first 3 evidences it can be valid. Because different imams study different hadiths after Quran at times their qiyas differs. The laymen usually just follow one scholar in this as Quran 21.7 says. When they study more they can choose between imams - Quran 4.59. Fiq has two 2 types fatwas and hukm. Fatwas are usually rulings for pure ibada or worship for Allah alone. This is usually based on the 5 pillars of Islam. Hukm are rulings between ppl, which can become worship with the right intentions & sometimes in the end may involve ppl's customs based on verses in Sura Nisa. That was for some context. As for what's at hand. Alot of ppl don't know the distinction of following terms. They mix up mantiq or logic which is sometimes used in qiyas with kalam which is a logic mixed with personal bias* over Quran & sunna - very wrong thing to do, esp. In Aqida or things dealing with 6 pillars iman. This makes the laymen of many sects view the attributes of Allah as deficient or limited violating Quran 16.60, which ties Allah's high description with believe in afterIife as we will see Allah in the hereafter, Quran 75.22. This would contradict many ayat. Quran 5.3 - Islam is a complete religion. Quran 5.48 - Islam is a criteria/judge of other religions. Quran 4.82 - Anything from other than Allah will contradict. Thus not only is incorrect but will lead to further division.
2ndary evidences like the bibIe or other kalam will have mix of truth & faIsehood and has to agree with Quran to be valid and relevant to be used properly. This is why ppl should study Islam first. Ibn Kathir shows a proper example of this is his tafsir which is the likely the most popular tafsir in the world of how to use ilmul kalam properly. I think it was for ayat Quran 23.91. --- What contradicts Quran & sunna is rejected. These are the 1st 2 evidences in Islam. The 3rd is ijm3 or consensus of the scholars starting with the sahabas. These 3 are binding & used in Aqida or creed belief which even **the avg. Muslim SHOULD know.** Proof for this is hadith where Muawiya got mad & struk his sIave and then felt bad. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessing be upon him was told & also feIt bad. He asked her where is Allah & who am I? She said Fi Sam3 or above the Heavens & you are His Rasul. Prophet Muhammad peace & blessing be on him said free her she is a believer. In another hadith it said she was mute & and pointed up & did other signals. The 4th evidence is qiyas or analogy based on how much an imam studied the text - This is more for fiq or physical worship. as long as it doesn't contradict the first 3 evidences it can be valid. Because different imams study different hadiths after Quran at times their qiyas differs. The laymen usually just follow one scholar in this as Quran 21.7 says. When they study more they can choose between imams - Quran 4.59. Fiq has two 2 types fatwas and hukm. Fatwas are usually rulings for pure ibada or worship for Allah alone. This is usually based on the 5 pillars of Islam. Hukm are rulings between ppl, which can become worship with the right intentions & sometimes in the end may involve ppl's customs based on verses in Sura Nisa. That was for some context. As for what's at hand.
For people who try to understand remember this 'Nothing like Him' & 'Don't imagine' He lives but not like us He see but not like us He hear but not like us He speak but not like us
I absolutely love getting on youtube and seeing content from you Brother Syfe ! May Allah Azzawajal protect and bless you always! , Please pray for me as i am trying to become a better muslim ! Peace be upon you brother .
JazakAllahu khairan for your kind words and support. It truly means a lot to me. May Allah guide you, strengthen your Imaan, and make your journey to becoming a better Muslim easy and full of blessings. I pray that Allah SWT protects us and continues to grow our faith.
@ Anytime i am able to see your videos and comment i will Inshallah ; The quran & your videos is what i use to prove non believers or christians who believe Isa was "Crucified" or the "Trinity" , I struggle to honestly direct my attention to Allah and learn the arabic language as i was raised speaking english and i have many sins but i always Pray and Tell Allah to give me time and protect me until i do become a better practicing muslim .... Muslims like you give me hope and confidence though i dont fully know the Quran or teachings these type of videos comfirm what i have always felt was true ... Maybe it is because God placed inside of me the spirit of Faith! stay blessed brother and continue to do what you are doing!
@@syfetalk the story of Abraham can be used against your argument, because Pagans believed that their Gods spoke with Sounds, read the Egyptian, Greek and Roman divine Myths, so, Abraham was Intentionally exposing their lies. My question is: how does Allah form the Sound, is that Sound already formed in him, does the sound leaves his being/is detached from his being when spoken, like the sound of our voice leaves us and enters other people`s minds, and then you have a part of my knowledge in you? does the sound of Allah enter our Minds in the same way, and is that sound created, and distinct from the eternal essence of Allah, can we say that we have some quality of Gods essence in us when we read the Quran?
Thank you for making videos, the research, and evidence you provide in them helped me accept Islam may Allah Azzawajal bless you in this life, and the next.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
I always turn on my pc at the morning, excited to watch your videos. Thank you brother for all the information about our religion! May Allah SWT reward you immensely for your hard work :)
No it isn't. You are still a muslim if you don't believe in any of the 3 three aqeedas. Stop making aqeeda mainstream islam when it isn't, you are doing Bidah.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
But what was the 'aqeedah' of the prophet salalahu alayhi wa salaam and the Sahaba may Allah be pleased with them. Because many of these indepth strange and philosophical issue weren't discussed in this way. Nor was anthropomorphic notions affirmed like they are by some .
He speaks. That's all that matters. Sounds like we understand or not, what matter is it? Are we going to be asked on judgement day or will we be understanding his speech?
Funny you should say that Because we're going to hear his voice on DOJ as has been explicitly stated: يقولُ اللَّهُ: يا آدَمُ، فيَقولُ: لَبَّيْكَ وسَعْدَيْكَ، فيُنادَى بصَوْتٍ إنَّ اللَّهَ يَأْمُرُكَ أنْ تُخْرِجَ مِن ذُرِّيَّتِكَ بَعْثًا إلى النَّارِ. الراوي : أبو سعيد الخدري | المحدث : البخاري | المصدر : صحيح البخاري | الصفحة أو الرقم : 7483 | خلاصة حكم المحدث : [صحيح] | التخريج : أخرجه مسلم
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
@@infoage265 Tahaawi is athari Bayhaqi isn't ashari like you Nawawi and ibn Hajr are, sorry to say, irrelevant here because we have the salaf. Now were we to look at the salaf we'd find them denouncing ashari creed indirectly and praising and advocating for athari creed
@@Ibrahim.l20 Stop lying bro, and don’t do Tadlees again😁. The word ينادى is مجهول which means the doer/فاعل is unknown, meaning it is/will be announced, therefore your insinuation of ALLAH being the announcer بصوت isn't proved. What you wrongly manipulated the meaning to be is ينادي with (ي) which is the معروف version means He announced. Anyone who studies hadith will know that every word is important to know.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Summary of the understanding of Allah's speech in accordance to Ahlul hadith: 1. It is uncreated 2. Allah speaks with letters and sounds 3. Has a beginning and an end (temporal) aka Allah can speak whenever he wants by his will and his power 4. Allah speaks as an action (verb)
@@syfetalk salam sorry first my uncle passed away and 2nd alhamdullilah hs a muslim and may allah guide christians take care allahhafiz and also May Allah bless you and all muslims ameen
إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون May Allah have mercy on your uncle, forgive his sins, and grant him Jannah. May Allah also give you and your family patience and ease during this difficult time. Remember him in your du'as, and consider offering acts of charity in his name.
May Palestine be Liberated from the Zionists may Syria be Liberated from the Nusayri ! And may The Ummah be Liberated from those regimes that conspire and collude with the two.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
بارك الله فيك اخي سيف. مجهودك عظيم في الرد على شبهات كل اعداء الإسلام مم الملاحدة والنصارى، والرد على اهل البدع من الصوفية والمتكلمة وغيرهم، ما شاء الله. أسأل الله ان يسكنك جنة الفردوس الأعلى بلا حساب ولا سابق عذاب، ويجعل لك ذرية صالحة مصلحة يدعون لك. نحبك في الله، اخوك نواف من السعودية.
Brothere and sisters, our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
I'll have to disagree with Syfe on this one. If I use morse code to communicate with someone, I am also using Sound to communicate, and the person I'm communicating with only knows the Sound of the morse code, they don't know the Sound that's inside me (My own Sound). So I don't see how there's a contradiction. The Quran tells us that Allah spoke directly with Moses, yes, but there's no explanation how the "speaking directly" happened. Our first instinct should not be that Allah spoke directly with moses like how we humans speak directly with each other as Allah is unique and There is nothing like him. Humans understand Sound because of the brain, The brain interprets it, Allah can speak directly by easily creating sound that a person's brain can interpret. The contradiction happens from what you're suggesting, If Allah did indeed 'DIRECTLY' speak with Moses by 'HIS OWN VOICE', then Moses knows 'What's inside Allah'. Because 'What's inside Allah is his own voice'. We must remember that when Moses Asked to see Allah, Allah told him that "You cannot see me (Allah's majesty)". Then it's safe to assume that Moses cannot hear Allah either as His Voice would be included in His Majesty.
i get what you’re saying but this doesn’t exactly disagree with brother syfe. Allah ﷻ has attributes like 2 right hands, a foot, a shin, a face etc, just because we as humans have also been blessed with the limited version of these attributes does not mean that our attributes are the same as allah wal iyathubillah. he is uniquely one. he has gifted us with these attributes as the hadith goes, he made adam with his own hand in accordance to his own image, in a limited fashion. as humans, despite having attributes like seeing and hearing, allah is all seeing, we are not. he’s all hearing, we are not. the believers will see allah in heaven and will hear him on the day of judgement…..does this now mean we know what’s in allah? no, however it does mean that we can see and recognize his attributes, his face, his speech etc because he’s choosing to show us and reveal it to us
I think you should add english subtitles in your videos as they can help those with hearing issues watch your videos. Love your work, btw. Keep it up brother.
I turned on the subtitles, and it said arabic, but it was showing english when he was speaking english, and it was showing arabic when he ewas speaking arabic
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
These aqida debates are stupid as hell. SO WHAT?! SALAHUDDIN WAS FROM THE ASHA'IRA. YOU GONNA SAY HE WAS A KAFIR WHO DIDNT DESERVE TO RULE OVER THE MUSLIMS????
Imagine raising the rank of someone who is not from the salaf, and take from him as if he is Infallible, no one from the salaf was an ashari, or maturidi, these 2 starts started appearing after the third hijri century, and you will follow such thing that never existed in Prophet's ﷺ and the salaf time? It makes sense why those asharis believe these stuff, and it's because they don't return back to the quran and the sunnah and what the salaf (correct opinions and sayings).
@@Ash-Shura Most Muslim fatihs and leaders and scholars are Asha’ari, Maturidi, Muffawidh. We’re all of them misguided? Was the Ummah for 1000 years ruled and believed in misguidance?!
@@Al-Azdi it seems you ignored the sahaba and tabi'in and their followers, were they asharis or maturidis or mufawwid? No, so you won't follow them just because what they followed doesn't make sense? Will you do the same that shias do? Just like how they ignored the sahaba and the salaf?
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah explained: "Allah's speech involves letters and sound, but it is unlike the speech of creation, just as His essence and other attributes are not like that of creation." The letters and sound of Allah's speech are unlike any created speech. Just as His other attributes (e.g., His hand, hearing, or seeing) are affirmed uniquely to Him, His speech is also uniquely divine. Imam Malik’s famous principle applies: "The how of it is unknown, belief in it is obligatory, and asking about it is innovation." affirming letters and sound does not delve into how Allah’s speech operates but rather acknowledges that these are inherent aspects of speech, revealed to us without further explanation. Denying that Allah’s speech involves letters and sound risks falling into ta’til (negation of Allah’s attributes), which the Salaf opposed.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
@@infoage265 ja unfortunately he is not..the things he is saying is wahhabi creed...unfortunately he is brainwashed..Ashari -Maturidi is the ahlus as sunnah..Allah doesnt speak with sound...this is anthropomorphism..this is the wahhabi creed which is literalism and anthropomorphism..also salafi is not this..this is wahhabi or pseudosalafi as the Tamiyah and those...Salaf is what the Sunni muslim is..... which is what the Ashari -Maturidi creed and the 4 madhabs from the 4 imams...All those follow Quran,Sunnah and the 1st 3 generations..He is exposed now for what he is which is a wahhabi or pseudosalafi...
Thats a lie on Imam Malik!! There’s not a single good isnad to him that he says “The how is Unkown”!! The real phrase with Authentic isnad he says “The how is Unreasonable” and “there’s no how to him” "الكيف غير معقول" "كيف عنه مرفوع" Ibn abd Albar mentioned it with the authentic isnad.
This is childish, what a strange interpretation of 5:116? How on earth does this prove Allah speaks like us?? Astaghfirullah. You wahhabis don't know what your talking about. Imam Tahawi was not referring to this when he referred to kalam. He was a Sunni scholar, not a khwarij / zahiri. Allah doesn't
Allah speaks. He spoke to Rasool Allah sallal lahu alaihi wa sallam. He spoke to Moosa alaihi sallam. But how, in what language we don't go into that. Allah knows best.
@@phantom_sy In your dreams. Imam Ahmed was not a takfiri anthropormophist. He loved the awliya og people of tasawwuf/tazkiya. His immediate followers who established his madhab, were not anti-Ashari, nor did they call them heretics. Only petro-dollars do.
You hate for the sake of your traditions which you have been handed down. No doubt their are some who call themselves salafi, but like the y3h0d they have affirmed the taghut. But you follow the assumptions, traditions and opinions of your scholars rather than the book of Allah Subhanu wa Ta'ala. And so you too are like the y3h0d
The example of Zachriah Aley Selam is a false comparison. Since we can’t compare the speech of man and silence of men to Allah swt. Allah swt says in the Quran surah Mulk Whether you speak secretly or openly-He surely knows best what is ˹hidden˺ in the heart. 67-13
According to Google dictionary sound define as "vibrations that travel through the air or another medium and can be heard when they reach a person's or animal's ear" it is clear that no one will apply this definition to the Creator.
the guy in the video literally applies it that way, he believes that vibrations entered the ear of Musa AS and that's how he heard the speech (that he believes is sounds and letters) of Allah SWT.
**Reassessing Syfe's Position on Tauhid Aqidah: Missteps, Lack of Historical Clarity, and Failure of Divine Comprehension** The critique of Syfe's *bullshittology* approach to Tauhid Aqidah unveils a critical misunderstanding rooted in reliance on post-enforcement opinions-those developed after the definitive rulings on Tauhid were sealed by the great imams, Imam Al-Ash'ari and Imam Al-Maturidi (at the end of the first 300 years of the Islamic Era, known as the Salafi Era and the enforcement of Aqidah Ahlussunnah Waljamaah). These rulings of both imams were originally oral tradition of Muslim Quraishy community, specifically crafted to guide *mukallaf* (accountable individuals) from both non-Qurayshi Arabs and non-Arabs. In parallel with expansion of earlier Islamic state, they were easily transferable and translatable into other Arabic dialects and non-Arabic languages, for both illiterate and literate *mukallaf* and at the end of first 300 years the whole oral teaching of tauhid were put in writing in details & sealed without dispute as Kitab *Syarah* Tauhid by both Imams, (Imam Asy'ari & Imam Maturidi).... These imams of Tauhid provided a framework to ensure the worship and veneration of the Creator remained free from anthropomorphism ( *tajsim* ) or polytheism ( *shirk* ), both outward ( *zahir* ) and inward ( *batin* ). Their rulings emphasized an unshakable principle: the Creator is fundamentally distinct from creation in every internal and external perspective. --- **The Era of Caliphate Enforcement** The enforcement of this sealed doctrine of both imams began during the era of the caliphates, each contributing to its preservation and propagation: - **Rashidun Caliphate (632-661 CE / 11-41 AH)** The golden era of foundational Islamic governance, laying the groundwork for theology. - **Umayyad Caliphate (661-750 CE / 41-132 AH)** A period of extensive territorial expansion where uniform theological frameworks were critical to unity. - **Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258 CE / 132-656 AH)** A golden age of Islamic scholarship, where the rulings of Imam Al-Ash'ari and Imam Al-Maturidi were widely codified and enforced. - **Ottoman Caliphate (1299-1924 CE / 699-1342 AH)** Continued strict adherence to classical theology, ensuring no deviation in the understanding of Tauhid. Each caliphate, in its era, punished those who introduced distortions and falsehoods about Allah, securing the legacy of these rulings. This strict enforcement remains valid until today and will continue until the end of time. No abrogation or cancellation of those punishment has ever been substantiated, making its permanence indisputable. So be careful when talking about Allah SWT... *Hoping Syfe gets a clear message!* --- **The Role of Opinions in Islam** Islamic opinions ( *ra'y* ) must never be conflated with creed ( *i'tiqad* ). To take opinions as creed risks disbelief ( *kufr* ). Opinions are merely tools for academic discourse in Islamic studies, not for mass public, never doctrines to be followed blindly. It is just like learning other religions in Islamic disciplinary study of high learning, purely for comparative religious study-not for belief ( *i'tiqad* ). The ruling for purposely ignoring or disputing these instructions is *Kufr* . Thus, believing in opinions is *Kufr* as well. Syfe’s reliance on opinions is thus a grave error, one that misleads by undermining consensus and going astray. --- *Syfe’s Misguided Reliance on Language* Syfe’s shallow grasp of Arabic further compounds his error. Mastery of the Arabic language does not equate to mastery of Qur'anic Arabic-this requires profound scholarship. Merely being an Arab does not guarantee an understanding of the divine language of the Quran, the language of noble Arabs, the Quraysh. *This mistake is glaringly exemplified in Syfe’s position.* ----------------- **The Consensus on QawnuHu Mutakalliman (قَوْنُهُ مُتَكَلِّمًا)** The consensus on *QawnuHu Mutakalliman* -affirming Allah as "The One Who Speaks"-has stood unchallenged for over 1,000 years. This case was closed definitively by the end of the third century AH, during the time of Imam Al-Ash'ari and Imam Al-Maturidi. The divine speech of Allah is unlike human speech or the speech of other creatures, such as organisms, animals, angels, or jinns, as it does not depend on organs, air, or other created elements. --- **The Burning Bush: A Unique Communication** Allah’s conversation with Musa (Moses, peace be upon him) stands as a testament to divine communication. It was not a vocalized sound generated by natural means but a direct, unmediated understanding placed into Musa’s mind. The burning bush provided an external phenomenon, but the essence of the communication was purely divine. Musa, upon seeing the fire on Mount Tursina, informed his wife of his intent to seek guidance there. What followed was a sacred invitation from Allah, where Musa engaged in a dialogue that transcended ordinary speech. The audible sounds of burning bushes associated with the event were not Allah’s voice but served to signify the sacredness of the encounter. Allah SWT *directed* comprehension directly into Musa’s consciousness, allowing a profound and unparalleled experience of divine connection. --- *Conclusion: Listen and Obey* The rulings of Tauhid as articulated by Imam Al-Ash'ari and Imam Al-Maturidi, enforced across caliphates and preserved in Islamic tradition, are timeless and NON-negotiable. Syfe’s position lacks consensus, depth, and comprehension of both Arabic and theological precision. *The case for Tauhid Aqidah is closed* : our duty is to listen, obey, and ensure the purity of belief remains untainted by misguidance or distortion. --- Case closed. This corrected version retains the original ideas, making them clearer and more cohesive while preserving the intended tone. ------------ *The Truth About Allah SWT and the Misleading Claims of Greek Influence* It is crucial to emphasize that Allah SWT is strictly not to be equated with any *Sky-god* or *Sky-residing* celestial deity conceived by pagan cultures. Allah SWT is the One, True Creator, beyond all anthropomorphic concepts or limited imaginings. The notion of attributing Allah SWT to any regional or mythical constructs of deities is not only inaccurate but profoundly disrespectful to the sanctity of Tawhid (Islamic monotheism). The *accusation* that the Aqidah of the Asya’irah (an ex-mu'tazili) and Maturidiyyah is a result of Greek philosophical influence is a glaring example of misinformation. *In truth* , these schools of thought arose from a sincere commitment to uphold the methodology of Islamic theology, balancing rational inquiry ( *‘Aql* ) with divine revelation ( *Naql* ). It is Allah SWT Himself who commands human beings to use their intellect, as stated in the Quran: * *Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of the night and the day are signs for those of understanding." (Quran 3:190)* This demonstrates that engaging the intellect is not an innovation but a divine mandate. *Greek Influence in Arab Culture? Let's Address This* The argument about supposed *Greek influence* in Arabic culture often relies on superficial associations. For instance, the claim that the Arabic script originates from the Greek alphabet (e.g., Alpha, Beta mirroring Alif, Ba) ignores the deep linguistic roots shared among Semitic languages. These similarities are likely coincidences or the result of shared phonetic heritage rather than direct borrowing. Arabic has its own unique lineage that predates any significant Greek interaction. *What About Greek Gods in Pre-Islamic Arabia?* It is true that Pre-Islamic Arabs worshipped various deities, some of which may have had loose associations with broader Hellenistic influences. Pagan Arabs had a pantheon of gods, with idols such as Lat, Uzza, and Manat (mentioned in Quran 53:19-20). However, these deities were distinctly Arab and deeply rooted in local traditions, not direct imports from Greek mythology. That said, some indirect Hellenistic cultural exchanges may have occurred via trade and regional interaction. For example: *Dionysus* , the Greek god of wine, may have influenced some rituals involving intoxication or celebration. *Aphrodite* , the Greek goddess of love, was possibly syncretized with Al-Uzza, given her association with fertility and beauty. These connections were, however, minimal and peripheral to the core practices of Arabian paganism.
6:07 if you really care about representing hadith correctly please read this. The word ينادى is مجهول which means the doer/فاعل is unknown, meaning it is/will be announced, therefore your insinuation of ALLAH being the announcer بصوت isn't proved. What you wrongly manipulated the meaning to be is ينادي which is the معروف version means He announced. Anyone who studies hadith will know that every word is important to know.
عندما قال الأشعري "الحشوية" تذكرت قول ابن القيم في نونيته: يا شاتم الحشوي حشو الـ ... ـدين والقرآن والآثار والإيمان أهلا بهم حشو الهدى وسواهم ... حشو الضلال فما هما سيان أهلا بهم حشو اليقين وغيرهم ... حشو الشكوك فما هما صنوان أهلا بهم حشو المساجد والسوى ... حشو الكنيف فما هما عدلان أهلا بهم حشو الجنان وغيرهم ... حشو الجحيم أيستوي الحشوان
You're going to have to clarify what is meant by "sound". That is something that is "heard" and not something that utilizes sound waves and requires atoms to travel, as his speech is unlike any of his creation. Otherwise Allah SWT would be unable to communicate in space. So this is a silly terminological difference not a theological one. Because the people in the video you mentioned simply are not applying the linguistic definition of sound i.e via limited sound waves, they acknowledge that Allah speaks but they do not acknowledge that his voice needs a medium to travel through which is by definition what the layman means when he says "sound". I'm in agreement with you, however, your explanation does more harm than good, as now you will have layman leaving this video believing that Allah communicates via sound waves LIKE his creation. The correct position is to affirm that Allah speaks, and that speech is heard. How? No one knows.
@abdulrehman_2410 Habibi in every way. The way they look at Hadith, the way they look at how people have understood Hadith and Fiqh and different opinions to there own even if it was practiced for more than 1000 years by Muslims. Salafiyah is not good for the Ummah. And I pray for this speaker aswell. Plus the way they support Saudis. Salafiyah is also Saudism
Allah also speaks to angels, إذ قلنا للملائكة.. creates with the WORD "BE" يقول له "كن" In a dictionary قول كل لفظ قال به اللسان Every spoken word pronounced by the tongue Also in Quran & Sunnah the word نادى النِّداء صوت المنادي المرتفع The loud voice of the caller
They dont deny Allah speaks. This is the thing that salafis get wrong about Ash'aris. Ash'aris are not mu'tazilah. Their errors are in fiqh not aqeedah. They affirm Allah's names and attributes like speech. Theu deny through ta'weel and tafweedh anything that likens Allah to his creation and because sound isna created thing they would(using the language of the mu'tazilah) deny that. Because there is nothing like unto Allah. They dont deny Allah speaks.
The Aqeedah is there for us to act upon it, not to become Aristotle or Plato or to follow the Greeks in their philosophical debates. Will I be held accountable for my actions ? Yes. As such I turn to my obligations, and act using the halal and haram as my yardsyick. Palestine is matter of life and death. Bait al-Maqdis is from the matters of creed. Liberation and protection an obligation.
People REALLY need to be careful when they talk about Allah SWT it could enter you into hellfire. I really hope they reflect on the stuff they say. It's clear in the Quran that Allah speaks to Mosa AS, Isa and others.etc This is serious misguidance....
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Alhamdullilah Allah didnt create us to understand his divine attributes just to affirm them and come to the logical conclusion that there is no god but Allah and subsequently worship and be grateful to Allah in accordance to the Quran and sunnah.
Surah Ash-Shura (42:51): “It is not for any human that Allah should speak to him except by revelation, or from behind a veil, or that He sends a messenger to reveal by His permission what He wills. Indeed, He is Most High and Wise.” This verse highlights that God's communication with humanity is through revelation or messengers, and not in a direct, personal manner as later Christian theology describes with Jesus.❤☝️
6:07 if you really care about hadith please take this into consideration, The word ينادى is مجهول, that's why it's translated as 'it will be announced' with sound بصوت, مجهول means that the doer/فاعل is unknown not translated as ينادي which is معروف and means He will announce, which you wrongly insinuate from it. If you studied hadith you would know that the wording is very important and has reasons behind it.
@yourfellowsister Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
@@TheHaqqRemains Abu Khadeejah ʿAbdul-Wāhid Imām al-Barbahārī (rahimahullāh, died 329 AH) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today.”[1]
جزاكم الله خيراً ، اخي يوسف افضح هؤلاء الصوفيّة لأنهم من شرور الناس في ابعاد المسلمين عن العقيدة الصحيحية ، وابدأ بكبرائهم واستند لنصوص القرآن والسنّة الصحاح حتى لا يقولون أنك وهابي او تيمي كما يقولون لكل شخص يتبع منهج السلف الصالح ، وحبذا تعمل حلقة للمسلمين الجدد ماذا يقرأون من كتب العقيدة حتى لا يقعون في فخ المنحرفين والمهرطقين والمبتدعين ككتاب التوحيد لمحمد عبدالوهاب وكتاب العقيدة الواسطية والحموية والتدمريّة واخيراً الطحاويّة .
Madkhalis when someone says something bad about rabee al madkhali Your this you're a mubtadi These people will continue to slander the scholars even when they're dead when they should make dua
@keeperkeeper1510 Ah so you mean people who take from awlan? Turaifi? who else? Qardawi? Sayyid qutb?.. Sheikh Rabee isn't infallible, i agree. But he reached out a milestone for destroying Sururiyyah.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
@@infoage265 As salaamu alaikum, I'm far from the perfect mumin astaughfirallah, but question .. are u just copying & pasting this under everyone's comments? If so why? What's the end game fam? .. May u & your loved ones be well & preserved
Yeah, it's nice to have a ABC-ilm of islam, so that tabloid theology can be made. A bunch of young najdi wahabis thinking they know better than the majority of scholars for 1400 years. What a joke.
It’s quite simple, there are three forms of speech and God possesses all forms of speech. One form of speech is thought or psychic, and another form of speech uses sound, and another form of speech is in writing. God possesses the power and the attributes of both the uncreated and the created.
I looked his claims up on a ashari channel, here is what i found as a refutation: the claim of the ashari is not that Allah swt cannot communicate because communication is not only in sound. Allah swt will communicate to us not on sound but else than it. I.e., his voice is not the sound of the humans rather his voice is different. Hence, we should not classify the sound of his voice as sound at all as it is different from it. Now, here is one observation i found which conviced me saif is wrong. This is that sound is a worldly thing and is just reverberations that travel through a medium which is created. To say Allah swt needs sound to talk is to say he depends on what is created. This is an error because Allah swt does not depend on his creation. His voice is not the sound we define as sound but else than it and by using basic definitions it is not right to call it sound at all. And understanding that bit helps to understand it. Wa allahu a3alam. Also, if you are reading this I don't want to hate or dunk on you I want to see your response to these assertions. As this was what I did to seek knowledge. I want to know what the salafi variant of the Athari aqidah says on this because as far as I sure the else acknowledges the attributes but leaves the definition to Allah swt rather than trying to define it.
Be careful my brothers and sisters in Islam, we are living in the end times and like Rasulullah S.A.W said, in the end times, to take care one iman will be like holding on a burning hot coal, so be careful who you are listening to learn your deen, just because someone wearing like a Muslim man and have long beard does not mean he is the one we should learn our knowledge from because he is famous or have some followers, do not fall into trick of shaitan, always ask your rabbal alamin to clean your heart and seek true guidance from him, Insya allah, he will guide you to listen from right person, May Allah SWT Guide us all to the straight path, amin..
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
❗❗SEND SALWAT ON THE PROPHET ﷺ RIGHT NOW ❗❗ SAY "Allaahumma salli wa sallim 'alaa Nabiyyinaa Muhammadin" Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever sends blessings upon me once, Allah will send blessings upon him ten times.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 408 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Muslim
Wallahi Brother you are a 10000% right! I dont understand where they get these ideas from? Are they conflating it with how we as Humans are guided vs the Prophets of Allah? Audhubillah! We as Humans ask Allah for guidence and we understand that Allah guides us in certain ways we cant understand but Allah knows best... But the Prophets of Allah SWT, they are special People and chosen by Allah SWT personally so the communication is gonna be much different. What these 2 are saying are a 100000% wrong! And then when they said, lets keep it confined to our class rooms. Ya Rabb, trying to misguide in secret! Audhubillah, who is feeding them this Insanity!? May Allah SWT Guide Us All!!! 🤲☝
Mashallah tabarakallah. Keep uniting the muslims on the path of the salaf. Too much aql over the naql with some of these guys. May Allah ﷻ guide them and us!
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Question When the prophet Muhammad ascended to the 7th heaven, the prophet Muhammad met Allah and Allah gave the command to pray 50 times to the prophet Muhammad for his people, including the prophet Muhammad himself. When he was in the 6th heaven, he met the prophet Moses and the prophet Moses said "what did Allah command you?" the prophet Muhammad replied: I was ordered to pray 50 times. Then the prophet Moses said: your people will not be able to do it, because I used to order the children of Israel to do it but they left it. And then the prophet Moses told the prophet Muhammad to ask for a waiver and then the prophet Muhammad met Allah again to ask for a waiver with the reason that the prophet Moses said until the round trip 40 then down to 10 until 5. And the prophet Moses said: your people will not be able to do it Because I used to order the children of Israel to do something less important but they left it and the prophet Moses said: ask Allah for a waiver, then the prophet Muhammad said: I feel ashamed because I protested to Allah against his order. And finally the prophet Moses said: well then, come down in the name of Allah The question 1. if the prophet Muhammad accepted the command of Allah and then continued to go to earth, or the prophet Muhammad did not want to follow the command of Allah SWT or Allah SWT did not grant the request of the prophet Moses, can we still do it? 2. Does Allah SWT know that the earth has 24 hours? How do we want to find sustenance, livelihood and others, play, sleep, work, rest and others? If we want to sleep, is it only for a short time? If we want to sleep after work, is it not enough? If 50 ÷ 24, is it only a few hours? Time is not enough. How does Allah SWT want to divide time so that it is not complicated? 3. Does Allah know the ability of humans to do that? 4. Does the prophet Moses know the ability of humans better than Allah? 5. If the Israelites were not able to do all that, does that mean that Allah is wrong? Or what is the real problem? 6. If God knows the capabilities of humans, why does he order to pray 50 times a day 7. If God is all-loving, all-knowing, why does he order us to pray 50 times a day? Does he know and love his creatures? 7. If Allah is all-loving, all- knowing, why does he tell us to pray 50 times? Does he know and love his creatures? 8. If he knew people would be burdened or unable to do it, why did he tell his servant to do that (50 prayer times)? 9. Why did Prophet Moses (peace be upon him) say that your people would not be able to do it? Isn't this as if he had denied the nature of Allah SWT who is all-knowing? Or what? 10. If Allah SWT knew that humans were not able to pray 50 times, why did he order Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to his people? Why did Allah SWT ask the devil "why don't you want to prostrate?" He could have kept mentioning the reason why the devil didn't want to prostrate. 11. If Allah SWT knew that it would eventually be 5 times and knew that Moses would say so and Prophet Muhammad would obey him, why didn't he keep mentioning 5 times? Why does it have to be like going back and forth like that? 12. How can old people like grandmothers and grandfathers want to perform 50 times a day prayers? And how can we who fast for 40 days want to perform 50 times a day prayers? 13. Is the event already planned by Allah SWT or how? 14. If Allah SWT knew that Prophet Muhammad met Prophet Moses, Prophet Moses asked for less and later it would be five, why did he make 50? why not five straight? 15. if Prophet Moses asked for relief because the previous people abandoned him and intended for mankind to obey Allah SWT, it means that Prophet Moses has made a solution so that the people of Prophet Muhammad obey Allah SWT or Prophet Moses knows better than Allah SWT about how to make mankind obey Allah swt 16. What did the prophet Muhammad do to Allah SWT is bargaining or begging? 17. Why does Allah SWT negotiate and bargain with Prophet Muhammad? ask for a discount, ask for a discount, like haggling at the market or what? 18. What is the difference between bargaining and begging? Pls, please answer, this is a question from a person who says she is Muslim but is secular and influenced a lot by Atheist books, I am confused. 🙏🏻 And if you can, make a video 🙏🏻 you can read hadits Bukhari 6963
People, when it comes to aqeedah / matters to do with creed/ ‘the what exactly we believe’, it has to be explained and or described clearly from Allah and His messenger as that. Even more so when it comes to things about Allah. There is no need nor room to expound any further using philosophical tools leading to speculating about the unseen in this case The Creator, Himself. If there is a question, and there is no clear answer to it then we don’t come up with an answer rather the answer is Allah knows best. And if we have a clear answer then we refer to it and don’t go beyond it.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
I don’t know, but I feel like I agree with them more than with you. Allah's attributes aren’t like ours. For example, we can see, but Allah is All-Seeing. He isn’t confined or limited by physical elements such as two eyes, light, electromagnetism, the brain, or other biochemical phenomena. To claim otherwise would be kufr, as Allah is pure and free from His creation. So, why wouldn’t His speech be different as well? Allah’s speech wouldn’t be limited or confined by physical phenomena such as sound, atmosphere, etc., nor would it be restricted by biochemical processes like the tongue, brain, or teeth required to form speech. Again, Allah is free from all limitations. I could be wrong, but I don’t see how Allah’s attributes need to be limited by these physical or biochemical phenomena. For instance, we know Allah has a hand, but we don’t know why or how.
Be careful without realizing it You likened Allah SWT to his creation by saying we humans, our voice is created and limited by physical elements, and you limited Allah SWT to our same limitations, and then you rejected your false description of the attribute. You said it correctly: we know Allah SWT has a hand, but we don’t know how. And this is the same rule we use for the speech of Allah SWT So we affirm the attribute of Allah; we affirm it's meaning but we refrain from trying to explain the How Inshaallah, please remember, we should affirm what Allah SWT affirmed about himself in the Quran and the Sunnah without تأويل (misinterpretation) or تمثيل (likening Allah to His creation) and without any تحريف (distortion of the meaning) or تعطيل (denying the names and attributes).
We do not liken to his creation thats the thing, we accept what Allah has affirmed for himself and we do not go to the howness, nor we add a meaning to it which has not been reported from the salaf, quran or sunnah.
Your last statement of not knowing why Allah has a hand or how He has a hand, should be the same approach you should have with His speech. Why do you insist on applying physics that applies to the creation upon the Creator? Perhaps the imagination that you adopt or anyone else for that matter when speaking about these attributes is wrong? When Allah says there is nothing like Him, then that's sufficient to know, whatever the mind imagines is automatically wrong, whether it is philosophy or tajseem and Tashbih.
☦️No, you are not wrong, so stop apologizing & capitulating to those hateful Salafi fools who embarrass Muslims. Asharis are right, while they believe in a Zeus like 'god'.
To deny that Allah speaks with sound is indirectly saying Allah doesn’t possess the ability of speech is he so wishes to communicate that way….this video was an excellent refutation ❤
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
If people know that they're going to see Allah, as clear as they see the Moon, then what is the difficulty in understanding hearing Allah? I just don't get it.
6:44 when it says كتاب الله، it is مضاف مضاف اليه 1) Do you say this means كلام الله, which usool do you use to say it's مجاز 2) Do you say this كتاب الله is a part of ALLAH's dhaat? Or a separate book?
I must be honest, your argument sounded like a straw man : by saying because Allah spoke to Musa Directly and some say without sounds and letters doesn’t mean Musa knew what was in the Nafs of Allah swt. The Nahl (bee) and the mother of Musa who also got a particular type of inspiration from Allah did not hear a voice telling her to toss Musa AS in the river, nor letters or sounds. So Allah is obviously not bound to speak with sound and letters, although, he can choose to. If the goal was to call them misguided because Allah has different modes of speech, then may Allah unite and and guide us. Please don’t be so quick to misunderstand your brothers. If we can’t use حسن الظن for our brothers especially inside ahle As-Sunnah then please don’t use internet. It def wasn’t present in the time of sahabah. But we won’t call you a mubtadi’ so please don’t be so quick to do so with your brothers. Salaam.
1. The fact that’s all you had to say is laughable to the relevant topic. 2. I picked this picture over a decade ago and just never really used this channel. 3. You just dry snitched on yourself that you watched it unless you’re assuming it’s p4p haram without having seen it which is just dumb for a Muslim to accuse another for something he himself hasn’t watched so I’ll excuse your comment in sha Allah. May Allah unite the hearts.
Brother you dont have enough credentials to talk about these topics These people you’re trying to correct are way out of your league You’re a good RUclipsr and your knowledge extends to correcting Sam Shamoun and its best you stay away from topics that are above your pay grade If u watch Yasin hanafi series from 10 years ago then you will see why you’re salafi aqeeda is mujasima aqeeda Stay away from these masa’l and leave it to the ulama
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
also he is lying..the ijma has agreed upon that Allah doesnt speak with letters or sounds but with different ways that people cant understand..and the huge majority of ijma was always and still is Ashari-Maturidi..so he lies
Hey guys, if you enjoyed this video, please consider supporting me and my channel by liking and subscribing.
If you want to contribute to help me continue to make more videos and improve the quality of my content,
You can send a donation via:
➡paypal.me/syfetalk
Assalamualaikum warahmatullah... When are you going to conclude to all the "100 reasons why islam is false" video. I will be waiting inshallah
If Allah speak with sound, then why none can hear it today?
Arent Allah's attributes eternal?
Then why His speech with its sound gone?
@namakubento9276, you are a devil 😈 Allah ( swbt) speak with sound and letters and if Allah( swbt) didn't speak with sound and letters then how did Gabriel angel hear the quran....
2ndary evidences like the bibIe or other kalam will have mix of truth & faIsehood and has to agree with Quran to be valid and relevant to be used properly. This is why ppl should study Islam first.
Ibn Kathir shows a proper example of this is his tafsir which is the likely the most popular tafsir in the world of how to use ilmul kalam properly.
I think it was for ayat Quran 23.91.
---
What contradicts Quran & sunna is rejected.
These are the 1st 2 evidences in Islam.
The 3rd is ijm3 or consensus of the scholars starting with the sahabas.
These 3 are binding & used in Aqida or creed belief which even **the avg. Muslim SHOULD know.**
Proof for this is hadith where Muawiya got mad & struk his sIave and then felt bad.
Prophet Muhammad peace and blessing be upon him was told & also feIt bad.
He asked her where is Allah & who am I?
She said Fi Sam3 or above the Heavens & you are His Rasul.
Prophet Muhammad peace & blessing be on him said free her she is a believer.
In another hadith it said she was mute & and pointed up & did other signals.
The 4th evidence is qiyas or analogy based on how much an imam studied the text -
This is more for fiq or physical worship.
as long as it doesn't contradict the first 3 evidences it can be valid.
Because different imams study different hadiths after Quran at times their qiyas differs.
The laymen usually just follow one scholar in this as Quran 21.7 says.
When they study more they can choose between imams - Quran 4.59.
Fiq has two 2 types fatwas and hukm.
Fatwas are usually rulings for pure ibada or worship for Allah alone.
This is usually based on the 5 pillars of Islam.
Hukm are rulings between ppl, which can become worship with the right intentions & sometimes in the end may involve ppl's customs based on verses in Sura Nisa.
That was for some context.
As for what's at hand.
Alot of ppl don't know the distinction of following terms.
They mix up mantiq or logic which is sometimes used in qiyas with kalam which is a logic mixed with personal bias* over Quran & sunna - very wrong thing to do, esp. In Aqida or things dealing with 6 pillars iman. This makes the laymen of many sects view the attributes of Allah as deficient or limited violating Quran 16.60, which ties Allah's high description with believe in afterIife as we will see Allah in the hereafter, Quran 75.22.
This would contradict many ayat.
Quran 5.3 - Islam is a complete religion.
Quran 5.48 - Islam is a criteria/judge of other religions.
Quran 4.82 - Anything from other than Allah will contradict.
Thus not only is incorrect but will lead to further division.
2ndary evidences like the bibIe or other kalam will have mix of truth & faIsehood and has to agree with Quran to be valid and relevant to be used properly. This is why ppl should study Islam first.
Ibn Kathir shows a proper example of this is his tafsir which is the likely the most popular tafsir in the world of how to use ilmul kalam properly.
I think it was for ayat Quran 23.91.
---
What contradicts Quran & sunna is rejected.
These are the 1st 2 evidences in Islam.
The 3rd is ijm3 or consensus of the scholars starting with the sahabas.
These 3 are binding & used in Aqida or creed belief which even **the avg. Muslim SHOULD know.**
Proof for this is hadith where Muawiya got mad & struk his sIave and then felt bad.
Prophet Muhammad peace and blessing be upon him was told & also feIt bad.
He asked her where is Allah & who am I?
She said Fi Sam3 or above the Heavens & you are His Rasul.
Prophet Muhammad peace & blessing be on him said free her she is a believer.
In another hadith it said she was mute & and pointed up & did other signals.
The 4th evidence is qiyas or analogy based on how much an imam studied the text -
This is more for fiq or physical worship.
as long as it doesn't contradict the first 3 evidences it can be valid.
Because different imams study different hadiths after Quran at times their qiyas differs.
The laymen usually just follow one scholar in this as Quran 21.7 says.
When they study more they can choose between imams - Quran 4.59.
Fiq has two 2 types fatwas and hukm.
Fatwas are usually rulings for pure ibada or worship for Allah alone.
This is usually based on the 5 pillars of Islam.
Hukm are rulings between ppl, which can become worship with the right intentions & sometimes in the end may involve ppl's customs based on verses in Sura Nisa.
That was for some context.
As for what's at hand.
Jazakallahu khairun for sharing this knowledge with us. May Allah continue to make this channel a success, Ameen.
For people who try to understand remember this 'Nothing like Him' & 'Don't imagine'
He lives but not like us
He see but not like us
He hear but not like us
He speak but not like us
I absolutely love getting on youtube and seeing content from you Brother Syfe ! May Allah Azzawajal protect and bless you always! , Please pray for me as i am trying to become a better muslim ! Peace be upon you brother .
JazakAllahu khairan for your kind words and support. It truly means a lot to me. May Allah guide you, strengthen your Imaan, and make your journey to becoming a better Muslim easy and full of blessings. I pray that Allah SWT protects us and continues to grow our faith.
@ Anytime i am able to see your videos and comment i will Inshallah ; The quran & your videos is what i use to prove non believers or christians who believe Isa was "Crucified" or the "Trinity" , I struggle to honestly direct my attention to Allah and learn the arabic language as i was raised speaking english and i have many sins but i always Pray and Tell Allah to give me time and protect me until i do become a better practicing muslim .... Muslims like you give me hope and confidence though i dont fully know the Quran or teachings these type of videos comfirm what i have always felt was true ... Maybe it is because God placed inside of me the spirit of Faith! stay blessed brother and continue to do what you are doing!
@@syfetalk
Amin.
@@syfetalk the story of Abraham can be used against your argument, because Pagans believed that their Gods spoke with Sounds, read the Egyptian, Greek and Roman divine Myths, so, Abraham was Intentionally exposing their lies.
My question is: how does Allah form the Sound, is that Sound already formed in him, does the sound leaves his being/is detached from his being when spoken, like the sound of our voice leaves us and enters other people`s minds, and then you have a part of my knowledge in you?
does the sound of Allah enter our Minds in the same way, and is that sound created, and distinct from the eternal essence of Allah, can we say that we have some quality of Gods essence in us when we read the Quran?
@@syfetalk
Youre Mujassam
Youre ascribe created attributes to Allah
Thank you for making videos, the research, and evidence you provide in them helped me accept Islam may Allah Azzawajal bless you in this life, and the next.
Muhammad, police be upon him!
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
If there isn't a sound how can we hear allah? That is still ridiculous respectfully
@@keeperkeeper1510 Allah imaginary god only talks to those mega phones
I always turn on my pc at the morning, excited to watch your videos. Thank you brother for all the information about our religion! May Allah SWT reward you immensely for your hard work :)
Aqeedah is the most important knowledge, and it's more important in our times where everyone is learned and can read.
No it isn't. You are still a muslim if you don't believe in any of the 3 three aqeedas. Stop making aqeeda mainstream islam when it isn't, you are doing Bidah.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
@@infoage265yapper
then why Allah didn't speak a single time about the "most important knowledge" use yr brain !!!!
But what was the 'aqeedah' of the prophet salalahu alayhi wa salaam and the Sahaba may Allah be pleased with them. Because many of these indepth strange and philosophical issue weren't discussed in this way. Nor was anthropomorphic notions affirmed like they are by some .
He speaks. That's all that matters. Sounds like we understand or not, what matter is it? Are we going to be asked on judgement day or will we be understanding his speech?
Funny you should say that
Because we're going to hear his voice on DOJ as has been explicitly stated:
يقولُ اللَّهُ: يا آدَمُ، فيَقولُ: لَبَّيْكَ وسَعْدَيْكَ، فيُنادَى بصَوْتٍ إنَّ اللَّهَ يَأْمُرُكَ أنْ تُخْرِجَ مِن ذُرِّيَّتِكَ بَعْثًا إلى النَّارِ.
الراوي : أبو سعيد الخدري | المحدث : البخاري | المصدر : صحيح البخاري | الصفحة أو الرقم : 7483 | خلاصة حكم المحدث : [صحيح] | التخريج : أخرجه مسلم
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Exactly, brother these aqeedah arguments are silly.
@@infoage265 Tahaawi is athari
Bayhaqi isn't ashari like you
Nawawi and ibn Hajr are, sorry to say, irrelevant here because we have the salaf. Now were we to look at the salaf we'd find them denouncing ashari creed indirectly and praising and advocating for athari creed
@@Ibrahim.l20
Stop lying bro, and don’t do Tadlees again😁.
The word ينادى is مجهول which means the doer/فاعل is unknown, meaning it is/will be announced, therefore your insinuation of ALLAH being the announcer بصوت isn't proved.
What you wrongly manipulated the meaning to be is ينادي with (ي) which is the معروف version means He announced.
Anyone who studies hadith will know that every word is important to know.
May Allah reward you plentifuly for your contribution to this ummah akhi!
Ameen. Jazakallah Khair
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
ameen
Every human can mistakes and the scholars you mentioned mistaken in the names and attributes of Allah@@infoage265
Summary of the understanding of Allah's speech in accordance to Ahlul hadith:
1. It is uncreated
2. Allah speaks with letters and sounds
3. Has a beginning and an end (temporal) aka Allah can speak whenever he wants by his will and his power
4. Allah speaks as an action (verb)
Well explained Akhi
So Allah's ﷻ kalam is not eternal if He stops speaking... Subhan'allah
@@HalalHarun the kalam of Allah is not created, because Allah is not created. What a stupid argument did you brought.
@@HalalHarunallahs attribute of speech is eternal but the individual words have a beginning in time since god has free will to speak as he wishes
@@HalalHarunOh wow 🤯
salam i am first i watch ur every video pls give heart and pls pray for my beloved uncle may allah swt guide them back
@@syfetalk salam sorry first my uncle passed away and 2nd alhamdullilah hs a muslim and may allah guide christians take care allahhafiz and also May Allah bless you and all muslims ameen
إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون
May Allah have mercy on your uncle, forgive his sins, and grant him Jannah. May Allah also give you and your family patience and ease during this difficult time. Remember him in your du'as, and consider offering acts of charity in his name.
اللَّهُمَّ اغْفِرْ لَهُ ، وَارْفَعْ دَرَجَتَهُ فِي الْمَهْدِيِّينَ ، وَاخْلُفْهُ فِي عَقِبِهِ فِي الْغَابِرِينَ ، وَاغْفِرْ لَنَا وَلَهُ يَا رَبَّ الْعَالَمِينَ ، وَافْسَحْ لَهُ فِي قَبْرِهِ ، وَنَوِّرْ لَهُ فِيهِ
@@syfetalk Muhammad, police be upon him!
@@syfetalk thank you brother
May Palestine be Liberated from the Zionists may Syria be Liberated from the Nusayri !
And may The Ummah be Liberated from those regimes that conspire and collude with the two.
Ameen.
Ameen
May Allah bless you brother Syfe
Ameen. Jazakallah Khair
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
بارك الله فيك اخي سيف. مجهودك عظيم في الرد على شبهات كل اعداء الإسلام مم الملاحدة والنصارى، والرد على اهل البدع من الصوفية والمتكلمة وغيرهم، ما شاء الله. أسأل الله ان يسكنك جنة الفردوس الأعلى بلا حساب ولا سابق عذاب، ويجعل لك ذرية صالحة مصلحة يدعون لك. نحبك في الله، اخوك نواف من السعودية.
Ameen, may Allah keep the muslims of saudi firm upon tawhid and Islam.
آمين يا رب
@@spawnnpwn4166 آمين جزاك الله خير
jazaka allahu khair syfe
Wa iyyak
Brothere and sisters, our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Alhamdulillah, jazakAllahu khair. May Allah put down the falsehood
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Elhamdulilah that you are preaching the true Aqidah my brother. The Ummah need this. May Allah reward you.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
The guy on the right, believes that invoking angels is Sunnah. He is saying that Rasulullah ﷺ was on the same religion as Abu Jahl.
@@infoage265
Where's the proof that nawawi and Ibn hajar held these beliefs?
@@infoage265
Asharis are from the mutazillah.
The proof being the mutazillah and asharis belief the Qur'an is created.
أنت كافر قذر ومن شك في كفرك فهو كافر أنت من نسل داود الجرجيس@@infoage265
I'll have to disagree with Syfe on this one.
If I use morse code to communicate with someone, I am also using Sound to communicate, and the person I'm communicating with only knows the Sound of the morse code, they don't know the Sound that's inside me (My own Sound). So I don't see how there's a contradiction. The Quran tells us that Allah spoke directly with Moses, yes, but there's no explanation how the "speaking directly" happened. Our first instinct should not be that Allah spoke directly with moses like how we humans speak directly with each other as Allah is unique and There is nothing like him.
Humans understand Sound because of the brain, The brain interprets it, Allah can speak directly by easily creating sound that a person's brain can interpret.
The contradiction happens from what you're suggesting, If Allah did indeed 'DIRECTLY' speak with Moses by 'HIS OWN VOICE', then Moses knows 'What's inside Allah'. Because 'What's inside Allah is his own voice'.
We must remember that when Moses Asked to see Allah, Allah told him that "You cannot see me (Allah's majesty)". Then it's safe to assume that Moses cannot hear Allah either as His Voice would be included in His Majesty.
MashAllah great explanation brother
We hear and we obey. That's ahlus Sunnah aqidah.
We understand the Quran based upon the language of the Arabs. Nobody said what you’re saying
I agree
i get what you’re saying but this doesn’t exactly disagree with brother syfe. Allah ﷻ has attributes like 2 right hands, a foot, a shin, a face etc, just because we as humans have also been blessed with the limited version of these attributes does not mean that our attributes are the same as allah wal iyathubillah. he is uniquely one.
he has gifted us with these attributes as the hadith goes, he made adam with his own hand in accordance to his own image, in a limited fashion.
as humans, despite having attributes like seeing and hearing, allah is all seeing, we are not. he’s all hearing, we are not.
the believers will see allah in heaven and will hear him on the day of judgement…..does this now mean we know what’s in allah? no, however it does mean that we can see and recognize his attributes, his face, his speech etc because he’s choosing to show us and reveal it to us
Jazakallah Khair. Your channel is a Gem
May Allah bless you and guide all our muslim brothers and sisters upon truth and tawheed
I think you should add english subtitles in your videos as they can help those with hearing issues watch your videos. Love your work, btw. Keep it up brother.
I turned on the subtitles, and it said arabic, but it was showing english when he was speaking english, and it was showing arabic when he ewas speaking arabic
This costs time + money
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
These aqida debates are stupid as hell.
SO WHAT?!
SALAHUDDIN WAS FROM THE ASHA'IRA.
YOU GONNA SAY HE WAS A KAFIR WHO DIDNT DESERVE TO RULE OVER THE MUSLIMS????
I don't believe Ashaira are kuffar. In the title of this video, i wrote: THESE MUSLIMS
Imagine raising the rank of someone who is not from the salaf, and take from him as if he is Infallible, no one from the salaf was an ashari, or maturidi, these 2 starts started appearing after the third hijri century, and you will follow such thing that never existed in Prophet's ﷺ and the salaf time? It makes sense why those asharis believe these stuff, and it's because they don't return back to the quran and the sunnah and what the salaf (correct opinions and sayings).
@@Ash-Shura
Most Muslim fatihs and leaders and scholars are Asha’ari, Maturidi, Muffawidh.
We’re all of them misguided? Was the Ummah for 1000 years ruled and believed in misguidance?!
@@Al-Azdi it seems you ignored the sahaba and tabi'in and their followers, were they asharis or maturidis or mufawwid? No, so you won't follow them just because what they followed doesn't make sense? Will you do the same that shias do? Just like how they ignored the sahaba and the salaf?
Alhamdulillah for Islam ❤
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah explained: "Allah's speech involves letters and sound, but it is unlike the speech of creation, just as His essence and other attributes are not like that of creation."
The letters and sound of Allah's speech are unlike any created speech. Just as His other attributes (e.g., His hand, hearing, or seeing) are affirmed uniquely to Him, His speech is also uniquely divine.
Imam Malik’s famous principle applies: "The how of it is unknown, belief in it is obligatory, and asking about it is innovation."
affirming letters and sound does not delve into how Allah’s speech operates but rather acknowledges that these are inherent aspects of speech, revealed to us without further explanation.
Denying that Allah’s speech involves letters and sound risks falling into ta’til (negation of Allah’s attributes), which the Salaf opposed.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
@@infoage265 ja unfortunately he is not..the things he is saying is wahhabi creed...unfortunately he is brainwashed..Ashari -Maturidi is the ahlus as sunnah..Allah doesnt speak with sound...this is anthropomorphism..this is the wahhabi creed which is literalism and anthropomorphism..also salafi is not this..this is wahhabi or pseudosalafi as the Tamiyah and those...Salaf is what the Sunni muslim is..... which is what the Ashari -Maturidi creed and the 4 madhabs from the 4 imams...All those follow Quran,Sunnah and the 1st 3 generations..He is exposed now for what he is which is a wahhabi or pseudosalafi...
Thats a lie on Imam Malik!!
There’s not a single good isnad to him that he says “The how is Unkown”!!
The real phrase with Authentic isnad he says “The how is Unreasonable” and “there’s no how to him”
"الكيف غير معقول"
"كيف عنه مرفوع"
Ibn abd Albar mentioned it with the authentic isnad.
@@Al-Azdi thats what they always do..lying
@@Al-Azdi shut up and study some Greek philosophy.
I love this channel 💜💜💜
May Allah SWT bless you 🤲🏾
بارك الله فيك, الفيديو جميل جدا ونافع للمسلمين, الله يضع جهودك في ميزانك الحسنات
MAY ALLAH PROTECT MUSLIM FROM WAHABIYA SAITAN !!!!
This is childish, what a strange interpretation of 5:116? How on earth does this prove Allah speaks like us?? Astaghfirullah.
You wahhabis don't know what your talking about. Imam Tahawi was not referring to this when he referred to kalam. He was a Sunni scholar, not a khwarij / zahiri.
Allah doesn't
The first 3 generations after the Prophet ﷺ would say otherwise 😆
Imam Ahmed himself is a thorn to the hearts of the Asha'ira and Maturidiyya.
Allah speaks. He spoke to Rasool Allah sallal lahu alaihi wa sallam. He spoke to Moosa alaihi sallam. But how, in what language we don't go into that. Allah knows best.
You're completely right brother, a very bizarre interpretation of that verse. Notice how he completely ignores the context of the verse.
@@phantom_sy In your dreams. Imam Ahmed was not a takfiri anthropormophist. He loved the awliya og people of tasawwuf/tazkiya. His immediate followers who established his madhab, were not anti-Ashari, nor did they call them heretics. Only petro-dollars do.
You hate for the sake of your traditions which you have been handed down.
No doubt their are some who call themselves salafi, but like the y3h0d they have affirmed the taghut.
But you follow the assumptions, traditions and opinions of your scholars rather than the book of Allah Subhanu wa Ta'ala. And so you too are like the y3h0d
May Allah guide this salafees if guidance is destined for him.
The example of Zachriah Aley Selam is a false comparison. Since we can’t compare the speech of man and silence of men to Allah swt.
Allah swt says in the Quran surah Mulk
Whether you speak secretly or openly-He surely knows best what is ˹hidden˺ in the heart.
67-13
According to Google dictionary sound define as "vibrations that travel through the air or another medium and can be heard when they reach a person's or animal's ear" it is clear that no one will apply this definition to the Creator.
the guy in the video literally applies it that way, he believes that vibrations entered the ear of Musa AS and that's how he heard the speech (that he believes is sounds and letters) of Allah SWT.
Wa assalamualikum wa rahmatullahi wabarakatuh.
I see everyone give salam in the comment section but none replies to brother Syfe's Salam ❤ 😂
**Reassessing Syfe's Position on Tauhid Aqidah: Missteps, Lack of Historical Clarity, and Failure of Divine Comprehension**
The critique of Syfe's *bullshittology* approach to Tauhid Aqidah unveils a critical misunderstanding rooted in reliance on post-enforcement opinions-those developed after the definitive rulings on Tauhid were sealed by the great imams, Imam Al-Ash'ari and Imam Al-Maturidi (at the end of the first 300 years of the Islamic Era, known as the Salafi Era and the enforcement of Aqidah Ahlussunnah Waljamaah).
These rulings of both imams were originally oral tradition of Muslim Quraishy community, specifically crafted to guide *mukallaf* (accountable individuals) from both non-Qurayshi Arabs and non-Arabs.
In parallel with expansion of earlier Islamic state, they were easily transferable and translatable into other Arabic dialects and non-Arabic languages, for both illiterate and literate *mukallaf* and at the end of first 300 years the whole oral teaching of tauhid were put in writing in details & sealed without dispute as Kitab *Syarah* Tauhid by both Imams, (Imam Asy'ari & Imam Maturidi)....
These imams of Tauhid provided a framework to ensure the worship and veneration of the Creator remained free from anthropomorphism ( *tajsim* ) or polytheism ( *shirk* ), both outward ( *zahir* ) and inward ( *batin* ). Their rulings emphasized an unshakable principle: the Creator is fundamentally distinct from creation in every internal and external perspective.
---
**The Era of Caliphate Enforcement**
The enforcement of this sealed doctrine of both imams began during the era of the caliphates, each contributing to its preservation and propagation:
- **Rashidun Caliphate (632-661 CE / 11-41 AH)**
The golden era of foundational Islamic governance, laying the groundwork for theology.
- **Umayyad Caliphate (661-750 CE / 41-132 AH)**
A period of extensive territorial expansion where uniform theological frameworks were critical to unity.
- **Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258 CE / 132-656 AH)**
A golden age of Islamic scholarship, where the rulings of Imam Al-Ash'ari and Imam Al-Maturidi were widely codified and enforced.
- **Ottoman Caliphate (1299-1924 CE / 699-1342 AH)**
Continued strict adherence to classical theology, ensuring no deviation in the understanding of Tauhid.
Each caliphate, in its era, punished those who introduced distortions and falsehoods about Allah, securing the legacy of these rulings.
This strict enforcement remains valid until today and will continue until the end of time.
No abrogation or cancellation of those punishment has ever been substantiated, making its permanence indisputable.
So be careful when talking about Allah SWT...
*Hoping Syfe gets a clear message!*
---
**The Role of Opinions in Islam**
Islamic opinions ( *ra'y* ) must never be conflated with creed ( *i'tiqad* ). To take opinions as creed risks disbelief ( *kufr* ).
Opinions are merely tools for academic discourse in Islamic studies, not for mass public, never doctrines to be followed blindly.
It is just like learning other religions in Islamic disciplinary study of high learning, purely for comparative religious study-not for belief ( *i'tiqad* ). The ruling for purposely ignoring or disputing these instructions is *Kufr* . Thus, believing in opinions is *Kufr* as well.
Syfe’s reliance on opinions is thus a grave error, one that misleads by undermining consensus and going astray.
---
*Syfe’s Misguided Reliance on Language*
Syfe’s shallow grasp of Arabic further compounds his error.
Mastery of the Arabic language does not equate to mastery of Qur'anic Arabic-this requires profound scholarship.
Merely being an Arab does not guarantee an understanding of the divine language of the Quran, the language of noble Arabs, the Quraysh.
*This mistake is glaringly exemplified in Syfe’s position.*
-----------------
**The Consensus on QawnuHu Mutakalliman (قَوْنُهُ مُتَكَلِّمًا)**
The consensus on *QawnuHu Mutakalliman*
-affirming Allah as "The One Who Speaks"-has stood unchallenged for over 1,000 years.
This case was closed definitively by the end of the third century AH, during the time of Imam Al-Ash'ari and Imam Al-Maturidi.
The divine speech of Allah is unlike human speech or the speech of other creatures, such as organisms, animals, angels, or jinns, as it does not depend on organs, air, or other created elements.
---
**The Burning Bush: A Unique Communication**
Allah’s conversation with Musa (Moses, peace be upon him) stands as a testament to divine communication. It was not a vocalized sound generated by natural means but a direct, unmediated understanding placed into Musa’s mind.
The burning bush provided an external phenomenon, but the essence of the communication was purely divine.
Musa, upon seeing the fire on Mount Tursina, informed his wife of his intent to seek guidance there. What followed was a sacred invitation from Allah, where Musa engaged in a dialogue that transcended ordinary speech.
The audible sounds of burning bushes associated with the event were not Allah’s voice but served to signify the sacredness of the encounter.
Allah SWT *directed* comprehension directly into Musa’s consciousness, allowing a profound and unparalleled experience of divine connection.
---
*Conclusion: Listen and Obey*
The rulings of Tauhid as articulated by Imam Al-Ash'ari and Imam Al-Maturidi, enforced across caliphates and preserved in Islamic tradition, are timeless and NON-negotiable.
Syfe’s position lacks consensus, depth, and comprehension of both Arabic and theological precision.
*The case for Tauhid Aqidah is closed* : our duty is to listen, obey, and ensure the purity of belief remains untainted by misguidance or distortion.
--- Case closed.
This corrected version retains the original ideas, making them clearer and more cohesive while preserving the intended tone.
------------
*The Truth About Allah SWT and the Misleading Claims of Greek Influence*
It is crucial to emphasize that Allah SWT is strictly not to be equated with any *Sky-god* or *Sky-residing* celestial deity conceived by pagan cultures.
Allah SWT is the One, True Creator, beyond all anthropomorphic concepts or limited imaginings.
The notion of attributing Allah SWT to any regional or mythical constructs of deities is not only inaccurate but profoundly disrespectful to the sanctity of Tawhid (Islamic monotheism).
The *accusation* that the Aqidah of the Asya’irah (an ex-mu'tazili) and Maturidiyyah is a result of Greek philosophical influence is a glaring example of misinformation.
*In truth* , these schools of thought arose from a sincere commitment to uphold the methodology of Islamic theology, balancing rational inquiry ( *‘Aql* ) with divine revelation ( *Naql* ).
It is Allah SWT Himself who commands human beings to use their intellect, as stated in the Quran:
* *Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of the night and the day are signs for those of understanding." (Quran 3:190)*
This demonstrates that engaging the intellect is not an innovation but a divine mandate.
*Greek Influence in Arab Culture? Let's Address This*
The argument about supposed *Greek influence* in Arabic culture often relies on superficial associations. For instance, the claim that the Arabic script originates from the Greek alphabet (e.g., Alpha, Beta mirroring Alif, Ba) ignores the deep linguistic roots shared among Semitic languages. These similarities are likely coincidences or the result of shared phonetic heritage rather than direct borrowing. Arabic has its own unique lineage that predates any significant Greek interaction.
*What About Greek Gods in Pre-Islamic Arabia?*
It is true that Pre-Islamic Arabs worshipped various deities, some of which may have had loose associations with broader Hellenistic influences.
Pagan Arabs had a pantheon of gods, with idols such as Lat, Uzza, and Manat (mentioned in Quran 53:19-20).
However, these deities were distinctly Arab and deeply rooted in local traditions, not direct imports from Greek mythology.
That said, some indirect Hellenistic cultural exchanges may have occurred via trade and regional interaction. For example:
*Dionysus* , the Greek god of wine, may have influenced some rituals involving intoxication or celebration.
*Aphrodite* , the Greek goddess of love, was possibly syncretized with Al-Uzza, given her association with fertility and beauty.
These connections were, however, minimal and peripheral to the core practices of Arabian paganism.
Does Allah hear those who are mute (can't make sounds), Do deaf people hear Allah?
BarakAllaahu fiikum, jazakumullaahu khoir. Alhamdulillah.
6:07 if you really care about representing hadith correctly please read this.
The word ينادى is مجهول which means the doer/فاعل is unknown, meaning it is/will be announced, therefore your insinuation of ALLAH being the announcer بصوت isn't proved.
What you wrongly manipulated the meaning to be is ينادي which is the معروف version means He announced.
Anyone who studies hadith will know that every word is important to know.
You're right, he tried to make it seem that Allah was the doer in that situation when that's not the case.
@@unknown-808delete those boss fights
He’s a diaspora Moroccan, an Arab toddler understands Arabic better than them .
May Allah save us from the deviancy of mubtadia
Ameen
Ameen
Ameen
ameen
May Allah bless and protect you, brother Syfe
عندما قال الأشعري "الحشوية" تذكرت قول ابن القيم في نونيته:
يا شاتم الحشوي حشو الـ ... ـدين والقرآن والآثار والإيمان
أهلا بهم حشو الهدى وسواهم ... حشو الضلال فما هما سيان
أهلا بهم حشو اليقين وغيرهم ... حشو الشكوك فما هما صنوان
أهلا بهم حشو المساجد والسوى ... حشو الكنيف فما هما عدلان
أهلا بهم حشو الجنان وغيرهم ... حشو الجحيم أيستوي الحشوان
Allahumma barik Syfe
You're going to have to clarify what is meant by "sound". That is something that is "heard" and not something that utilizes sound waves and requires atoms to travel, as his speech is unlike any of his creation. Otherwise Allah SWT would be unable to communicate in space. So this is a silly terminological difference not a theological one. Because the people in the video you mentioned simply are not applying the linguistic definition of sound i.e via limited sound waves, they acknowledge that Allah speaks but they do not acknowledge that his voice needs a medium to travel through which is by definition what the layman means when he says "sound". I'm in agreement with you, however, your explanation does more harm than good, as now you will have layman leaving this video believing that Allah communicates via sound waves LIKE his creation. The correct position is to affirm that Allah speaks, and that speech is heard. How? No one knows.
Salafism is too extreme. May Allah guide all of you. Ameen
In what way Akhi? Ameen and you as well
@abdulrehman_2410
Habibi in every way. The way they look at Hadith, the way they look at how people have understood Hadith and Fiqh and different opinions to there own even if it was practiced for more than 1000 years by Muslims. Salafiyah is not good for the Ummah. And I pray for this speaker aswell. Plus the way they support Saudis. Salafiyah is also Saudism
Allah also speaks to angels, إذ قلنا للملائكة.. creates with the WORD "BE"
يقول له "كن"
In a dictionary
قول
كل لفظ قال به اللسان
Every spoken word pronounced by the tongue
Also in Quran & Sunnah the word نادى
النِّداء
صوت المنادي المرتفع
The loud voice of the caller
They dont deny Allah speaks. This is the thing that salafis get wrong about Ash'aris. Ash'aris are not mu'tazilah. Their errors are in fiqh not aqeedah. They affirm Allah's names and attributes like speech. Theu deny through ta'weel and tafweedh anything that likens Allah to his creation and because sound isna created thing they would(using the language of the mu'tazilah) deny that. Because there is nothing like unto Allah. They dont deny Allah speaks.
Ashari is not a fiqh madhab...
The Aqeedah is there for us to act upon it, not to become Aristotle or Plato or to follow the Greeks in their philosophical debates.
Will I be held accountable for my actions ? Yes. As such I turn to my obligations, and act using the halal and haram as my yardsyick.
Palestine is matter of life and death. Bait al-Maqdis is from the matters of creed. Liberation and protection an obligation.
People REALLY need to be careful when they talk about Allah SWT it could enter you into hellfire. I really hope they reflect on the stuff they say. It's clear in the Quran that Allah speaks to Mosa AS, Isa and others.etc
This is serious misguidance....
Even surat Al-Ikhlas,Falaq,An-nas and kafirun were revealed from Allah directly to the prophet Muhammed sallallahu Alieyhi salaam .
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
جزاك الله خيراً
Allah speaks in a way that befits His majesty.
Allah will question U on the day of judgement. How could you say, Allah doesn't speak?
Salam aylakum syfe love you for the sake of Allah
Love from Morocco 🇲🇦
Wa Alaikumu Salam Wa Rahmatu Allahi Wa Barakatuhu. Let's go 💪🏾 representing Morocco ❤️
Alhamdullilah Allah didnt create us to understand his divine attributes just to affirm them and come to the logical conclusion that there is no god but Allah and subsequently worship and be grateful to Allah in accordance to the Quran and sunnah.
Surah Ash-Shura (42:51): “It is not for any human that Allah should speak to him except by revelation, or from behind a veil, or that He sends a messenger to reveal by His permission what He wills. Indeed, He is Most High and Wise.”
This verse highlights that God's communication with humanity is through revelation or messengers, and not in a direct, personal manner as later Christian theology describes with Jesus.❤☝️
Yes that's excatly what the brother in the video says. Allah spoke to Musa directly, who is a messenger.
6:07 if you really care about hadith please take this into consideration,
The word ينادى is مجهول, that's why it's translated as 'it will be announced' with sound بصوت, مجهول means that the doer/فاعل is unknown
not translated as ينادي which is معروف and means He will announce, which you wrongly insinuate from it.
If you studied hadith you would know that the wording is very important and has reasons behind it.
@@ZagiEscobar what about the rest of the statements?
The “behind a veil” part is the one that fit how He ﷻ directly talked to Musa alayhi salam, as no one in this dunya can see Allah ﷻ
@yourfellowsister Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Someone said 'Aqidah isn't important and that Salafis make people liberal with their 'Aqidah classes.🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
May Allah guide him and us all
Haqiqatjou is getting out of hand😅
@@Bane..0_o Well it's not compulsory in order to be a Muslim but more like extra knowledge that one can use to strengthen the Deen.
@@BeHumbleAndLessArrogant aqeedah is compulsory
@@TheHaqqRemains Evidence?
@@TheHaqqRemains Abu Khadeejah ʿAbdul-Wāhid
Imām al-Barbahārī (rahimahullāh, died 329 AH) stated: “Know that Allah’s Messenger (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one, and that is the Jamā’ah.” It was said, “And who are they, O Allah’s Messenger?” He (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) responded, “That which I and my Companions are upon today.”[1]
I agree with most of his videos but this one I majorly disagree with and reject it entirely
جزاكم الله خيراً ، اخي يوسف افضح هؤلاء الصوفيّة لأنهم من شرور الناس في ابعاد المسلمين عن العقيدة الصحيحية ، وابدأ بكبرائهم واستند لنصوص القرآن والسنّة الصحاح حتى لا يقولون أنك وهابي او تيمي كما يقولون لكل شخص يتبع منهج السلف الصالح ، وحبذا تعمل حلقة للمسلمين الجدد ماذا يقرأون من كتب العقيدة حتى لا يقعون في فخ المنحرفين والمهرطقين والمبتدعين ككتاب التوحيد لمحمد عبدالوهاب وكتاب العقيدة الواسطية والحموية والتدمريّة واخيراً الطحاويّة .
تَعالى (أي الله) عَنِ الْحُدُودِ وَالْغَاياتِ والأَرْكَانِ والأعْضَاءِ والأَدَواتِ لا تَحْويِهِ الْجِهَاتُ السِّتُّ كَسَائِرِ الْمُبْتَدَعَاتِ .
May Allah be pleased with you
Barakallahu feekum, please make a Video for people who say "Madkhali", even tho it doesn't exist.
@@SoulsLikeMe madkhali 🤬🤬🤬😡😠😠😮💨😤😾😾😾🙄🙄😱😱😱🗣️🗣️
Yaeh, what is this madkali stuff. It's just like a made up words
Madkhalis when someone says something bad about rabee al madkhali
Your this you're a mubtadi
These people will continue to slander the scholars even when they're dead when they should make dua
@keeperkeeper1510 Ah so you mean people who take from awlan? Turaifi? who else? Qardawi? Sayyid qutb?.. Sheikh Rabee isn't infallible, i agree. But he reached out a milestone for destroying Sururiyyah.
@@keeperkeeper1510 Rabe al madkhali can prove his aqeedah from the quran and the sunnah,
Jazakallahu khairan
"Allahs speech is an act of his creation"
-imam Ali
because how can something occur in him which he him self made it to occur
Athari is so simple. Easy to undersstand where ashari/maturidi is confusing and filled with philosophical mambo jambo.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
@@infoage265 As salaamu alaikum, I'm far from the perfect mumin astaughfirallah, but question .. are u just copying & pasting this under everyone's comments?
If so why? What's the end game fam? .. May u & your loved ones be well & preserved
@@heezyhines2209 he is sick
Yeah, it's nice to have a ABC-ilm of islam, so that tabloid theology can be made. A bunch of young najdi wahabis thinking they know better than the majority of scholars for 1400 years. What a joke.
no...u ar every wrong..its literalism and anthropomorfism..there is not athari creed...this is the wahhabi creed
Wa alay kum salaam waragmahtuALLAAH hi wabarakahtu akhee Sayf and to everyone else
ITs incredibly simple not to fall into this by refer back to who we are supposed to.
It’s quite simple, there are three forms of speech and God possesses all forms of speech. One form of speech is thought or psychic, and another form of speech uses sound, and another form of speech is in writing. God possesses the power and the attributes of both the uncreated and the created.
BaarakAllaahu feek Akhi.
I looked his claims up on a ashari channel, here is what i found as a refutation: the claim of the ashari is not that Allah swt cannot communicate because communication is not only in sound. Allah swt will communicate to us not on sound but else than it. I.e., his voice is not the sound of the humans rather his voice is different. Hence, we should not classify the sound of his voice as sound at all as it is different from it.
Now, here is one observation i found which conviced me saif is wrong. This is that sound is a worldly thing and is just reverberations that travel through a medium which is created. To say Allah swt needs sound to talk is to say he depends on what is created. This is an error because Allah swt does not depend on his creation. His voice is not the sound we define as sound but else than it and by using basic definitions it is not right to call it sound at all. And understanding that bit helps to understand it.
Wa allahu a3alam.
Also, if you are reading this I don't want to hate or dunk on you I want to see your response to these assertions. As this was what I did to seek knowledge. I want to know what the salafi variant of the Athari aqidah says on this because as far as I sure the else acknowledges the attributes but leaves the definition to Allah swt rather than trying to define it.
الحمد للله جزاك الله خيرا
Be careful my brothers and sisters in Islam, we are living in the end times and like Rasulullah S.A.W said, in the end times, to take care one iman will be like holding on a burning hot coal, so be careful who you are listening to learn your deen, just because someone wearing like a Muslim man and have long beard does not mean he is the one we should learn our knowledge from because he is famous or have some followers, do not fall into trick of shaitan, always ask your rabbal alamin to clean your heart and seek true guidance from him, Insya allah, he will guide you to listen from right person, May Allah SWT Guide us all to the straight path, amin..
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
You’re wrong. The speech of Allah is not composed with sound. Allahs speech is heard and is eternal without sound
You know better than Bukhari when he spoke about the sound of Allah
@@syfetalkBukhari never said Allah speaks with sounds and letters lol!
Infact he weakend a hadith the suggests that, so he mostly reject that stance
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
❗❗SEND SALWAT ON THE PROPHET ﷺ RIGHT NOW ❗❗ SAY "Allaahumma salli wa sallim 'alaa Nabiyyinaa Muhammadin"
Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever sends blessings upon me once, Allah will send blessings upon him ten times.”
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 408
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Muslim
Wallahi Brother you are a 10000% right! I dont understand where they get these ideas from? Are they conflating it with how we as Humans are guided vs the Prophets of Allah? Audhubillah! We as Humans ask Allah for guidence and we understand that Allah guides us in certain ways we cant understand but Allah knows best... But the Prophets of Allah SWT, they are special People and chosen by Allah SWT personally so the communication is gonna be much different. What these 2 are saying are a 100000% wrong! And then when they said, lets keep it confined to our class rooms. Ya Rabb, trying to misguide in secret! Audhubillah, who is feeding them this Insanity!? May Allah SWT Guide Us All!!! 🤲☝
Thoughts
Intelligence
And then when the movie plays in my head
I hear a narrator with a firm voice
Don't care wat u lot Wana believe
Mashallah tabarakallah. Keep uniting the muslims on the path of the salaf. Too much aql over the naql with some of these guys.
May Allah ﷻ guide them and us!
Alhamdoulilah jake called them out and quoted reliable people
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
بارك الله فيكم لقيامك بالردود على الأشاعرة الجهمية لايت
May Allah guide them to ahlus sunnah
MashAllah 🙏🏼
جزاك اللهُ خيرًا بارك الله فيك أحبك في الله أخي يهديكم الله و يصلح بالكم تقبل الله منا ومنكم بأمان الله آمين يارب العالمين
اللهم بارك ❤❤❤❤❤❤
Question
When the prophet Muhammad ascended to the 7th heaven, the prophet Muhammad met Allah and Allah gave the command to pray 50 times to the prophet Muhammad for his people, including the prophet Muhammad himself. When he was in the 6th heaven, he met the prophet Moses and the prophet Moses said "what did Allah command you?" the prophet Muhammad replied: I was ordered to pray 50 times. Then the prophet Moses said: your people will not be able to do it, because I used to order the children of Israel to do it but they left it. And then the prophet Moses told the prophet Muhammad to ask for a waiver and then the prophet Muhammad met Allah again to ask for a waiver with the reason that the prophet Moses said until the round trip 40 then down to 10 until 5. And the prophet Moses said: your people will not be able to do it Because I used to order the children of Israel to do something less important but they left it and the prophet Moses said: ask Allah for a waiver, then the prophet Muhammad said: I feel ashamed because I protested to Allah against his order. And finally the prophet Moses said: well then, come down in the name of Allah
The question
1. if the prophet Muhammad accepted the command of Allah and then continued to go to earth, or the prophet Muhammad did not want to follow the command of Allah SWT or Allah SWT did not grant the request of the prophet Moses, can we still do it?
2. Does Allah SWT know that the earth has 24 hours? How do we want to find sustenance, livelihood and others, play, sleep, work, rest and others? If we want to sleep, is it only for a short time? If we want to sleep after work, is it not enough? If 50 ÷ 24, is it only a few hours? Time is not enough. How does Allah SWT want to divide time so that it is not complicated?
3. Does Allah know the ability of humans to do that?
4. Does the prophet Moses know the ability of humans better than Allah?
5. If the Israelites were not able to do all that, does that mean that Allah is wrong? Or what is the real problem?
6. If God knows the capabilities of humans, why does he order to pray 50 times a day 7. If God is all-loving, all-knowing, why does he order us to pray 50 times a day? Does he know and love his creatures?
7. If Allah is all-loving, all- knowing, why does he tell us to pray 50 times? Does he know and love his creatures?
8. If he knew people would be burdened or unable to do it, why did he tell his servant to do that (50 prayer times)?
9. Why did Prophet Moses (peace be upon him) say that your people would not be able to do it? Isn't this as if he had denied the nature of Allah SWT who is all-knowing? Or what?
10. If Allah SWT knew that humans were not able to pray 50 times, why did he order Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to his people? Why did Allah SWT ask the devil "why don't you want to prostrate?" He could have kept mentioning the reason why the devil didn't want to prostrate.
11. If Allah SWT knew that it would eventually be 5 times and knew that Moses would say so and Prophet Muhammad would obey him, why didn't he keep mentioning 5 times? Why does it have to be like going back and forth like that?
12. How can old people like grandmothers and grandfathers want to perform 50 times a day prayers? And how can we who fast for 40 days want to perform 50 times a day prayers?
13. Is the event already planned by Allah SWT or how?
14. If Allah SWT knew that Prophet Muhammad met Prophet Moses, Prophet Moses asked for less and later it would be five, why did he make 50? why not five straight?
15. if Prophet Moses asked for relief because the previous people abandoned him and intended for mankind to obey Allah SWT, it means that Prophet Moses has made a solution so that the people of Prophet Muhammad obey Allah SWT or Prophet Moses knows better than Allah SWT about how to make mankind obey Allah swt
16. What did the prophet Muhammad do to Allah SWT is bargaining or begging?
17. Why does Allah SWT negotiate and bargain with Prophet Muhammad? ask for a discount, ask for a discount, like haggling at the market or what?
18. What is the difference between bargaining and begging?
Pls, please answer, this is a question from a person who says she is Muslim but is secular and influenced a lot by Atheist books, I am confused. 🙏🏻 And if you can, make a video 🙏🏻 you can read hadits Bukhari 6963
People, when it comes to aqeedah / matters to do with creed/ ‘the what exactly we believe’, it has to be explained and or described clearly from Allah and His messenger as that. Even more so when it comes to things about Allah. There is no need nor room to expound any further using philosophical tools leading to speculating about the unseen in this case The Creator, Himself. If there is a question, and there is no clear answer to it then we don’t come up with an answer rather the answer is Allah knows best. And if we have a clear answer then we refer to it and don’t go beyond it.
Allah will give “Salam” Peace, how do they not know that?
But without sound
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
@infoage265 how without sounds?
People love that sheikh harry potter guy
I don’t know, but I feel like I agree with them more than with you.
Allah's attributes aren’t like ours. For example, we can see, but Allah is All-Seeing. He isn’t confined or limited by physical elements such as two eyes, light, electromagnetism, the brain, or other biochemical phenomena. To claim otherwise would be kufr, as Allah is pure and free from His creation.
So, why wouldn’t His speech be different as well? Allah’s speech wouldn’t be limited or confined by physical phenomena such as sound, atmosphere, etc., nor would it be restricted by biochemical processes like the tongue, brain, or teeth required to form speech. Again, Allah is free from all limitations.
I could be wrong, but I don’t see how Allah’s attributes need to be limited by these physical or biochemical phenomena.
For instance, we know Allah has a hand, but we don’t know why or how.
Be careful without realizing it You likened Allah SWT to his creation by saying we humans, our voice is created and limited by physical elements, and you limited Allah SWT to our same limitations, and then you rejected your false description of the attribute.
You said it correctly: we know Allah SWT has a hand, but we don’t know how. And this is the same rule we use for the speech of Allah SWT
So we affirm the attribute of Allah; we affirm it's meaning but we refrain from trying to explain the How
Inshaallah, please remember, we should affirm what Allah SWT affirmed about himself in the Quran and the Sunnah without تأويل (misinterpretation) or تمثيل (likening Allah to His creation) and without any تحريف (distortion of the meaning) or تعطيل (denying the names and attributes).
We do not liken to his creation thats the thing, we accept what Allah has affirmed for himself and we do not go to the howness, nor we add a meaning to it which has not been reported from the salaf, quran or sunnah.
Your last statement of not knowing why Allah has a hand or how He has a hand, should be the same approach you should have with His speech.
Why do you insist on applying physics that applies to the creation upon the Creator?
Perhaps the imagination that you adopt or anyone else for that matter when speaking about these attributes is wrong?
When Allah says there is nothing like Him, then that's sufficient to know, whatever the mind imagines is automatically wrong, whether it is philosophy or tajseem and Tashbih.
☦️No, you are not wrong, so stop apologizing & capitulating to those hateful Salafi fools who embarrass Muslims. Asharis are right, while they believe in a Zeus like 'god'.
@@EasternRomanOrthodox. says the polytheist? 😂
With all due respect Saif. Are you a scholar?
Clearly not, this is why the sheikh said this should not be discussed openly.
To deny that Allah speaks with sound is indirectly saying Allah doesn’t possess the ability of speech is he so wishes to communicate that way….this video was an excellent refutation ❤
Define sound
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
If people know that they're going to see Allah, as clear as they see the Moon, then what is the difficulty in understanding hearing Allah? I just don't get it.
May Allah bless you
6:44 when it says كتاب الله، it is مضاف مضاف اليه
1) Do you say this means كلام الله, which usool do you use to say it's مجاز
2) Do you say this كتاب الله is a part of ALLAH's dhaat? Or a separate book?
Allah swt does what he wills ☝️🤓🤗
I must be honest, your argument sounded like a straw man : by saying because Allah spoke to Musa Directly and some say without sounds and letters doesn’t mean Musa knew what was in the Nafs of Allah swt. The Nahl (bee) and the mother of Musa who also got a particular type of inspiration from Allah did not hear a voice telling her to toss Musa AS in the river, nor letters or sounds. So Allah is obviously not bound to speak with sound and letters, although, he can choose to. If the goal was to call them misguided because Allah has different modes of speech, then may Allah unite and and guide us. Please don’t be so quick to misunderstand your brothers. If we can’t use حسن الظن for our brothers especially inside ahle As-Sunnah then please don’t use internet. It def wasn’t present in the time of sahabah. But we won’t call you a mubtadi’ so please don’t be so quick to do so with your brothers. Salaam.
Change your pfp, haram anime
1. The fact that’s all you had to say is laughable to the relevant topic.
2. I picked this picture over a decade ago and just never really used this channel.
3. You just dry snitched on yourself that you watched it unless you’re assuming it’s p4p haram without having seen it which is just dumb for a Muslim to accuse another for something he himself hasn’t watched so I’ll excuse your comment in sha Allah. May Allah unite the hearts.
May Allah bless you & may we meet in Jannah ❤. Inshallah @@VangolaXProdiGee
Great video
Allah spoke to Ibrahim.
Brother you dont have enough credentials to talk about these topics
These people you’re trying to correct are way out of your league
You’re a good RUclipsr and your knowledge extends to correcting Sam Shamoun and its best you stay away from topics that are above your pay grade
If u watch Yasin hanafi series from 10 years ago then you will see why you’re salafi aqeeda is mujasima aqeeda
Stay away from these masa’l and leave it to the ulama
Cope jahmi desi
@TheHaqqRemains
Typing from the Jungles of Nigeria,the dawla of TikTok guys are pityful.
By the way, You literally worship Zeus lol
Subhan Allah
Early finally thanks for the video brother
Wallahi these guys should be in jail for saying about Allah what is nothing but lies, and for misguiding the masses.
Brothere and sisters our brother Syfe is not as knowledgeable as he appears. I wonder if he is willing to refute the likes of Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for they held these beliefs. The likes of Imam Bayhaqi or Imam Tahawi. I'm not saying the asharis are correct. However, I am saying this is an opinion held by reputable scholars of Islam who even the scholars of the salafis take from in matters of fiqh. Syfe is in no place to declare these brothers as misguided for he is not a scholar and is simply regurgitating what he is familiar with. The asharis do not deny Allah speaks. They believe He will speak in a way that is beyond comprehension, and we will hear his speech with our ears, but it will not be with letter or sound. Allah knows best. Nevertheless, the asharis have a long line of scholars that support this opinion, so they aren't pulling this out of thin air or making stuff up. Again, this is not about who is right or wrong but it is about understanding these brothers were orientated upon this with support of scholars. Just like brother Syfe was orientated upon his understanding with the support of scholars. In that sense the two parties are on equal playing fields.
Would you say this about Imam Nawawi. Should he have been in jail too?
@@infoage265 Muhammed Shams Al-Deen has already highlighted some of Imam An-Nawawis potentially kufri beliefs, go check them out.
also he is lying..the ijma has agreed upon that Allah doesnt speak with letters or sounds but with different ways that people cant understand..and the huge majority of ijma was always and still is Ashari-Maturidi..so he lies
Bro those are sufis who invented thier own stuff and following it, instead following the truth.