Despite being a Doncastrian, and growing up just two miles from Gresley's office, hearing the Plant works former air raid siren signalling lunch time for the staff, i couldn't help being drawn to the clean lines and powerful looks of this GWR family of engines. Simple from the outside, ingenious and beautifully engineered inside they have a masterful stately prescence about them. Thank you for a wonderful description of this fabulous machine.
My son met Anthony at locomotion last week. His passion for the project was clearly on show and loves that people are watching these videos and then being inspired to visit all their sites. Highly recommend anyone who hasnt been, to visit all their museum sites and see these engines in person AND maybe stumble across all the hosts of these videos and share your appreciation for them in person!
Churchward's Saint Class was described by OS Nock as the "keystone in the arch" and was arguably the most important engine built in Britain as it was such a huge leap forward in loco development. Churchward was interested in "balance" and the avoidance of "hammer blow" to avoid track damage that a two cylinder engine like the Saint might cause and that was also why he was interested in those four cylinder French locos that were bought. Churchward's engines were considered ugly when introduced and they were beautified by Holcroft- with the curves instead of the previous drop ends and these curves debuted on the Star. Both the Saint and the Star had the same boiler which had very high pressure and very high degree of ( for the time) superheating- and that was revolutionary in Britain back then. Arguably, the Star was complicated and maybe developing the Saint further would have made sense. Clearly, the Star was the start of a family of successful engines that also extended to the LMS when Stanier left the GWR for that railway. During World War One the brass beading was removed from the splashers and for some reason this was not replaced when the engine was restored for display- although the later "elbow" steam pipes were removed as they were a later addition. The Saint really was the engine that brought the Great Western into the 20th century- not the Star and Stanier's Black 5 class- a very close but mixed traffic derivative of the Saint hauled Britain's last steam train in August 1968 which sums up the reality of the importance of the Saint class.
And 2999 ‘Lady of Legend’ is a working reproduction of the Saint design, which has appeared on several heritage railways recently, and is based at Didcot.
@@johnkeepin7527 "W.A. Tuplin commented; "No other locomotive design, except perhaps Stephenson's 'Rocket', has represented such a long leap in the right direction as GWR No. 98." Number 98 was the second prototype Saint and had the new taper boiler. The last Saint in service- Saint David was subject to a preservation attempt. I have seen a letter sent from the British Transport Commission- of which BR was a part, with words to the effect that " the engine represents a national asset and we cannot wait to realise its value". Pretty stupid as there were probably dozens of engines awaiting scrapping at Swindon at that time and one engine not being dismantled in haste would hardly be a major cash flow problem for BR. Just an example of idiotic officialdom at work.
@@NickRatnieks So sad. Do read A Brush with Steam by David Shepherd who had many dealings with various bodys which is quite amusing. Best from a Signed copy of course Lovely man. David and Lily Reading Builder of many projects in 5 inch gauge.
@@steamsearcher Back in 1996, I was on the 25th Anniversary Special of the 1971 "Return To Steam" by No 6000- the special was hauled by 6024 and David Shepherd was on board and I got to meet him- I don't know if Peter Prior was on the train but it was a great experience. I did go to Longmoor Military Railway in 1968 and worked on Clan Line- when David Shepherd's own engines were there his locos were there and once again in 1969 for cadet training- not long before the railway was closed and the future for the railway afterwards was ended by local opposition.
I was initially raised in Kingskerswell between Newton Abbot and Torquay alongside the Torbay line. I loved the GWR house style. Imagine my shock when we moved to Poole when I was 10 years old and was confronted by the mess of loco styles that defined the Southern!
Anthony, I'm a relative newcomer to this series but the work that you and your colleagues do in putting together the videos is superb. Educative and hugely watchable, there can scarcely be a better combination. Sincere thanks.
Another fantastic video that is incredibly well presented. I know road steam isn’t what the national rail museum is about but it would be interesting to see the difference between the relative simplicity of say a Burrell traction engine and the complex rail locos done in the curator with a camera series.
The GWR French compounds were built in 1903 and 1905, not 1906. 1906 was the year that the first Star, North Star, was built, using some of the ideas embodied in the compounds. The LNWR 4-6-0 that could be built cheaper than a Star wasn't the Claughton class illustrated, but the much simpler 2 cylinder Experiment class. In 1910 a locomotive exchange between the Star and Experiment classes was carried out on the 2 railways, with the Star completely justifying its higher price. The LNWR brought out the 4 cylinder Claughtons in 1913, as an equivalent to the Star, but they had missed out several of the details that made the Stars so good. The Claughton's performance was still inferior to the Star's.
Excellent tutorial, Doctor Coulls. As a slight aside, the engineer Harold Holcroft was the man responsible for the GWR 'house' style. He later went on to work with Sir Nigel Gresley in developing the valve gear for locomotives, such as Flying Scotsman & Mallard.
Holcroft actually went to the SR and worked under Richard Maunsell. He came up with a 3-cylinder conjugated layout that gave Gresley some ideas (there was a lot of knowledge sharing between the SR, LMS and LNER - GWR was more insular). However, Holcroft's layout wasn't successful and the SR Schools Class ended up having three sets of valve gear.
I'd never realised what the condenser in the cab roof did for the displacement lubricator. I'd made a wild guess that it was for heating - which made zero sense with the firebox in front! Thank you for that..
@@paulredding5864 Dunno about better looking but their main line engines, at least, were certainly extraordinarily handsome machines. This was brought home to me recently on seeing footage of the newly returned 'Blue Peter' - simply stunning. And that's coming from a dyed-in-the-wool Western man!
I don't know why the narrator uses G.J. Churchward's name as though he was in the dock, accused of a crime. If you see the nameplate of the 4073 class named after him, it is as I have used it here. The Directors and everyone else on the GWR referred to him as Mr. Churchward. They do the same with Brunel and if you look at the Tamar Bridge with his name on it, it is I.K. Brunel.
It's how I refer to him conversationally, that's all. In the presentation it didn't feel right to simply say George Churchward, or GJ Churchward. Doesn't take any admiration away from him. I'd personally say Isambard Kingdom Brunel as well. Each to their own and neither of us is wrong.
Will we be getting a video on the Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway Class 5? That’s one of my favourite locos at York, and I love seeing it when I the NRM. Lode Star is ok too, but I’m more partial to other pre-grouping locos, like what they have in the station hall (any idea when that will be reopening?).
Depending on when these episodes were filmed, the L&YR Class 5 has currently been moved to the Bury Transport Museum at the ELR to be with LMS 2500 From what I know, the station hall should be reopening late 2024 - early 2025
An excellent and informative video of my favourite NRM locomotive. Would love to see an additional video on the exhaust steam injector and maybe a GWR Churchward combined vacuum, ejector and steam brake (City of Truro might have one as Lode Star has a separate vacuum brake and ejector with no steam brake) but understand they’d be omitted for being very technical for general viewing!
To be fair, those are great suggestions, we can look at them when we do those locos, I try not to repeat endless regulator and reverser facts and have started cross-referencing films. Will see what we can do!
@@anthonycoulls7301 Thank you for your response and for your tremendous efforts in bringing new, educational and engaging content to the internet. I loved manning loco cabs as an events volunteer at the NRM and it was always nice to add new knowledge from explainer and volunteer insights. The GWR combination brake is of particular interest as I did a footplate ride on 4555 last month and just couldn’t quite understand how it functioned as a steam brake as well as an ejector.
@@mcollier4566 having worked Truro and 5972 with it, challenge accepted. We're looking for more cab access volunteers at York now if you could be tempted back 😁
@@anthonycoulls7301 I’ve only had a go on 4270 and Erlestoke Manor to date, both of which have a separate ejector. Everything makes sense with the combination brake up to the point where you disconnect the vac bags and can use it as a steam brake! I’d love to come back and help out, albeit on a fairly infrequent basis as I now live and work in the Midlands. Henry Oakley was my last regular steed and despite knowing very little about diesels I always found the Deltic very interesting. Always hoped for Lode Star. Maybe one day!
Imagine if the chronology had been slightly different....if Churchward had taken charge slightly later. Suppose that he had got the GWR to buy deGlehn / du Bousquet 4-6-0s instead of Atlantics. Compounds that could climb Dainton with a decent load. Could have totally changed the direction of British locomotive development.
It's a handsome thing isn't it? Even more so in person. Must admit i never really used to 'get' the GWR thing - felf a bit like tbe railway hipsters liking the 'real' engines rather than those mainstream ones, but with more appreciation of the engineering and hisfory they were very important trendsetters.
@@Train_Tok_Man Just curious about your interest. Have you seen images of 'The Agenoria'. It did do thirty years work, which is clear in the wear of the wheel tyres. Made by Foster Rastrick & Co 1829 as was 'Stourbridge Lion'. 'Stourbridge Lion' deserved a better opportunity to shine after it's arrival in the USA. But it needed an iron railroad.
I wonder why Swindon didn't re-fit brass beadings to the splashers when preparing it for display in 1962? They removed the outside steam pipes and fitted a tall safety valve casing to present a pre WW1 appearance.
As for steaming certain locomotives again there are some that are out of the question now. Even though they did get revived after the end of BR steam in 1968. The GNR 'Single', the Midland 'Compound'. You can add 'Green Arrow' and Lode Star too. The GNR loco has a very poor firebox & the driving wheel tyre is at scrapping thickness,. 'Green Arrow' still has its original cylinder block, which is now badly cracked. Lode Star looks to have very thin tyres all round & who knows about the state of the boiler? I don't suppose it has been surveyed. As for 'Evening Star'... I rode behind it on the Scarborough Spa Express which was many years ago. The locomotive is the 3rd newest steam locomotive in Britain & was never thrashed on freight trains, which was what it was designed for. On the modern railway a speed limit may apply on account of it having smaller driving wheels, but it definitely has the low-down grunt.
Evening Star is never going out on the mainline again (or any other 9F for that matter) as the flangeless centre driving wheels are incompatible with the raised checkrails on some modern points. Risk of the wheel riding up on the checkrail and derailing the loco.
@richardharrold9736 Being the only locomotive in preservation outshopped by Swindon, it will never be considered for steaming, that has always been the line of the museum.
@richardharrold9736 just because you don't like the answer doesn't make it nonsense, the T3 was in poor mechanical condition totally different, but now made possible by technology advancements. There's only is one ex works Swindon loco remaining, and after over 60 years, while no longer pristine, it still is original, and will be remaining so for as long as it can be left. not everything in the collection should steam again, and there's already plenty for the brasso fans to enjoy.
I'm glad I never had to work on one but its a beautiful machine. Elegant as were all its followers. Nice explanations .:I believe lode' is an old Norse word meaning 'the north' or 'Pole' star. ?-)
Lode Star's trailing pair of driving wheels are of a different (later) pattern to the leading and middle pair. The trailing wheels are from the "Castle" class with webbing reinforcement and the crankpin is between the spokes, whereas the other four driving wheels have the crankpin in line with the spoke and have no webbing. It's likely the trailing pair were swapped in when Lode Star was being cosmetically restored following withdrawal. Closer examination of the number stampings on the wheel hubs should show which engine previously had the trailing pair.
A worthwhile enhancment would be to replace corks with a proper closure with a hinged cap with projecting lug which could be opened with the spout of the oil can. This is a standard fitment on Swedish steam locos.
The cork had the advantage that, if it fell out, it would cause no damage to the motion. The reed was actually unnecessary - other railways used corks and found there was no problem with oil flow.
Oh, so this has an inverse Gresley conjugated valve gear! Also question I’ve had for a long time, why do most brake handles have the drilled holes in them?
Very well made video as per usual , now Cheltenham is back please keep her in as last ran BR green ,also any chance one day of seeing Mallard in as last ran BR green even if for a year only
The directors asked Churchward why his locomotive cost twice as much as those of one of their competitors. His retort was that one of his would pull two of theirs backwards.
@@TheSudrianTerrier653while seeing the Star work again is a tantalising idea, she is simply too good to steam. The restoration to museum (as built - they went above and beyond!) condition was carried out at Swindon works by artisans who serviced her in regular service - this can never be repeated as the works are no more, those people gone, remaining tools scrapped or dispersed. Returning the Star to steam would require strip down and servicing, new parts etc and after being used for 10years would require another strip down for continued operation/ restoring to museum condition. This would erase the efforts by those at Swindon. There are plenty of Star derivatives (Castles) which still go and let the Star be enjoyed and looked after in the NRM
There was a list of National Collection engines that had steamed at one time or other, whilst others had never steamed, but were now considered too old or unviable to risk steaming - for example, the Compound, the GNR Single, the D-class, the J17, J69, Aerolite, the Dean Goods and 9400. That also includes Mallard, Evening Star and Green Arrow. Likewise Lode Star which I understood to have flaws in one or more of the cylinder castings.
It’s very unlikely to steam again, as prior to its preservation it was cosmetically (at least, but that’s another story) overhauled at Swindon and still carries the same paint job, and as a way to preserve/honour their work it’s how it will remain as any attempts to overhaul it mechanically will require a new paint job at the end.
LMS did that but it didn't fit the GWR aesthetic. GWR only used outside valve gear on the 1500 class pannier rank, I think - and that was just before nationalisation.
Good suggestion, get the model railway people displaying, , wealth of scale history, stations, and stimulate the young more there size, history need new converts,
Why were some railways right- hand drive and others left-hand drive ... why not standardize driver position like they standardized the track gauge? Any advantages to left-hand verse right-hand positions?
Individual railways generally had a standardized side for driving, so would have all their engines manufactured that way. However there are always exceptions. In Victoria, Australia the government railway, Victorian Railways, drove on the left side on the Broad Gauge. The narrow gauge line due to the first engines being imported from America were right hand drive as were all the locally made copies. When two additional engines were bought from Beyer Peacock, Garratt engines G41 & G42 they were also right hand drive. Does it really make a difference. Maybe. But with a tank engine when half the time you are going bunker first, you are then on the opposite side of the cab. If you have a second person in the cab they are also responsible for looking for signals and collecting and delivering safe working tokens as required. The biggest obstacle is sight lines due to boiler or tender or hoods.
RHD is easier for most firemen when it comes to accurately placing the coal onto the grate but means they have to help look out for signals, which are almost always on the left. The other big three railways settled on LHD, with many locos being converted from RHD - like Flying Scotsman - but the GWR always did its own thing.
@@terrier_productions Yes that is part of it, more so for express or high speed running. On "branch lines" probably not as important, nor where turning facilities were not available.
I must disagree completely. 3ft 6" is not a 'very narrow gauge', and was carefully considered and ultimately the ideal choice, given the nature of our terrain and the economics concerned. It was a wise choice, not a 'bad' one.
Why is it looking so dirty and scruffy?. I was lucky enough to being allowed to stand on the footplate, 40 years ago on a quiet morning in the old Swindon museum. I also had a photo of my father and his father(who was a GW driver) standing next to the cab of Lode Star at about 1930 when they were on their way to Portsmouth, on holiday. but my father, who was 11 at the time didnt know where the photo was taken.
The varnish on the paint is failing and that results in the loss of gloss finish. Nice to hear your family connections and experience of the old Swindon Museum, much as I remember it around the same time.
@@anthonycoulls7301 Hi, Yes i called in there a few times back in those days, and remember the old chap who used to look after it, he was a nice guy, he let me have a good loo around it as i was building a 4mm model of it at the time
@@anthonycoulls7301 Oh! you said on one of the Q&A videos you grew up on GWR territory. you said it when I asked if city of turo that's in steam in swindon could be looked at
Despite being a Doncastrian, and growing up just two miles from Gresley's office, hearing the Plant works former air raid siren signalling lunch time for the staff, i couldn't help being drawn to the clean lines and powerful looks of this GWR family of engines. Simple from the outside, ingenious and beautifully engineered inside they have a masterful stately prescence about them. Thank you for a wonderful description of this fabulous machine.
My son met Anthony at locomotion last week. His passion for the project was clearly on show and loves that people are watching these videos and then being inspired to visit all their sites. Highly recommend anyone who hasnt been, to visit all their museum sites and see these engines in person AND maybe stumble across all the hosts of these videos and share your appreciation for them in person!
Poor Lode is the only preserved GWR 4-6-0 that’s never run in preservation, and i would absolutely love to see it overhauled and run at some point
Steam locos are so fascinatingly complicated to operate, and vary so much.
The GWR 4-6-0's from Stars to Castles and Kings were arguably the MGM of British locomotives.
Churchward's Saint Class was described by OS Nock as the "keystone in the arch" and was arguably the most important engine built in Britain as it was such a huge leap forward in loco development. Churchward was interested in "balance" and the avoidance of "hammer blow" to avoid track damage that a two cylinder engine like the Saint might cause and that was also why he was interested in those four cylinder French locos that were bought. Churchward's engines were considered ugly when introduced and they were beautified by Holcroft- with the curves instead of the previous drop ends and these curves debuted on the Star. Both the Saint and the Star had the same boiler which had very high pressure and very high degree of ( for the time) superheating- and that was revolutionary in Britain back then. Arguably, the Star was complicated and maybe developing the Saint further would have made sense. Clearly, the Star was the start of a family of successful engines that also extended to the LMS when Stanier left the GWR for that railway. During World War One the brass beading was removed from the splashers and for some reason this was not replaced when the engine was restored for display- although the later "elbow" steam pipes were removed as they were a later addition. The Saint really was the engine that brought the Great Western into the 20th century- not the Star and Stanier's Black 5 class- a very close but mixed traffic derivative of the Saint hauled Britain's last steam train in August 1968 which sums up the reality of the importance of the Saint class.
And 2999 ‘Lady of Legend’ is a working reproduction of the Saint design, which has appeared on several heritage railways recently, and is based at Didcot.
@@johnkeepin7527 "W.A. Tuplin commented; "No other locomotive design, except perhaps Stephenson's 'Rocket', has represented such a long leap in the right direction as GWR No. 98." Number 98 was the second prototype Saint and had the new taper boiler. The last Saint in service- Saint David was subject to a preservation attempt. I have seen a letter sent from the British Transport Commission- of which BR was a part, with words to the effect that " the engine represents a national asset and we cannot wait to realise its value". Pretty stupid as there were probably dozens of engines awaiting scrapping at Swindon at that time and one engine not being dismantled in haste would hardly be a major cash flow problem for BR. Just an example of idiotic officialdom at work.
@@NickRatnieks So sad.
Do read A Brush with Steam by David Shepherd who had many dealings with various bodys which is quite amusing. Best from a Signed copy of course Lovely man.
David and Lily Reading Builder of many projects in 5 inch gauge.
@@steamsearcher Back in 1996, I was on the 25th Anniversary Special of the 1971 "Return To Steam" by No 6000- the special was hauled by 6024 and David Shepherd was on board and I got to meet him- I don't know if Peter Prior was on the train but it was a great experience. I did go to Longmoor Military Railway in 1968 and worked on Clan Line- when David Shepherd's own engines were there his locos were there and once again in 1969 for cadet training- not long before the railway was closed and the future for the railway afterwards was ended by local opposition.
Beautiful engineering. Truly beautiful to behold.
I was initially raised in Kingskerswell between Newton Abbot and Torquay alongside the Torbay line. I loved the GWR house style. Imagine my shock when we moved to Poole when I was 10 years old and was confronted by the mess of loco styles that defined the Southern!
I visited the museum in April with my family, a really good day out and i do remember Load Star,
Many thanks , Sisaket Thailand.
That should be LODE star, after the North star
It would be great to see a view of the running gear from an inspection pit!
If you visit STEAM in Swindon, you can walk under Caerphilly Castle. It's pretty much the same.
@@rogercantwell3622
Thank you
We will
Anthony, I'm a relative newcomer to this series but the work that you and your colleagues do in putting together the videos is superb. Educative and hugely watchable, there can scarcely be a better combination. Sincere thanks.
Another fantastic video that is incredibly well presented. I know road steam isn’t what the national rail museum is about but it would be interesting to see the difference between the relative simplicity of say a Burrell traction engine and the complex rail locos done in the curator with a camera series.
As a road engine man when not at work, that's a fascinating concept, cheers Myke
The GWR French compounds were built in 1903 and 1905, not 1906.
1906 was the year that the first Star, North Star, was built, using some of the ideas embodied in the compounds.
The LNWR 4-6-0 that could be built cheaper than a Star wasn't the Claughton class illustrated, but the much simpler 2 cylinder Experiment class. In 1910 a locomotive exchange between the Star and Experiment classes was carried out on the 2 railways, with the Star completely justifying its higher price. The LNWR brought out the 4 cylinder Claughtons in 1913, as an equivalent to the Star, but they had missed out several of the details that made the Stars so good. The Claughton's performance was still inferior to the Star's.
The layout of the cab is so clean and organized -- unlike many that you have shown in the past. Anthony is the best curator BTW, more of him
I really appreciate this top drawer tour of the Star class. Thanks so very much.
Excellent tutorial, Doctor Coulls. As a slight aside, the engineer Harold Holcroft was the man responsible for the GWR 'house' style. He later went on to work with Sir Nigel Gresley in developing the valve gear for locomotives, such as Flying Scotsman & Mallard.
Holcroft actually went to the SR and worked under Richard Maunsell. He came up with a 3-cylinder conjugated layout that gave Gresley some ideas (there was a lot of knowledge sharing between the SR, LMS and LNER - GWR was more insular). However, Holcroft's layout wasn't successful and the SR Schools Class ended up having three sets of valve gear.
@@rogercantwell3622 Yes, that's how I understand it.
Afraid I'm not a Doctor, but thanks for the compliment!
@@anthonycoulls7301 Apologies Mr Coulls. However, the tutorial still stands, which is very good.
A wonderful engine and video , well done team
Thanks Anthony for another great video
Fascinating! Thankyou!
Great video! Could we get a crab episode?
I’d be up for one. It just depends how long the station hall renovations take (which shouldn’t be too long now).
Great insight into a great engine.Thank you for these videos.
Fascinating! Thank you very much!
I'd never realised what the condenser in the cab roof did for the displacement lubricator. I'd made a wild guess that it was for heating - which made zero sense with the firebox in front! Thank you for that..
It’s interesting to see the differences between a GWR and LNER/LMS locomotive, great video
Yup...just confirms how much better looking LNER locos were...😉
@@paulredding5864 Dunno about better looking but their main line engines, at least, were certainly extraordinarily handsome machines. This was brought home to me recently on seeing footage of the newly returned 'Blue Peter' - simply stunning. And that's coming from a dyed-in-the-wool Western man!
I don't know why the narrator uses G.J. Churchward's name as though he was in the dock, accused of a crime. If you see the nameplate of the 4073 class named after him, it is as I have used it here. The Directors and everyone else on the GWR referred to him as Mr. Churchward. They do the same with Brunel and if you look at the Tamar Bridge with his name on it, it is I.K. Brunel.
It's how I refer to him conversationally, that's all. In the presentation it didn't feel right to simply say George Churchward, or GJ Churchward. Doesn't take any admiration away from him. I'd personally say Isambard Kingdom Brunel as well. Each to their own and neither of us is wrong.
Will we be getting a video on the Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway Class 5? That’s one of my favourite locos at York, and I love seeing it when I the NRM.
Lode Star is ok too, but I’m more partial to other pre-grouping locos, like what they have in the station hall (any idea when that will be reopening?).
Depending on when these episodes were filmed, the L&YR Class 5 has currently been moved to the Bury Transport Museum at the ELR to be with LMS 2500
From what I know, the station hall should be reopening late 2024 - early 2025
Nice to see LNTN get a mention!
My home town. Had to be done!
Proper engineering.
An excellent and informative video of my favourite NRM locomotive. Would love to see an additional video on the exhaust steam injector and maybe a GWR Churchward combined vacuum, ejector and steam brake (City of Truro might have one as Lode Star has a separate vacuum brake and ejector with no steam brake) but understand they’d be omitted for being very technical for general viewing!
To be fair, those are great suggestions, we can look at them when we do those locos, I try not to repeat endless regulator and reverser facts and have started cross-referencing films. Will see what we can do!
@@anthonycoulls7301 Thank you for your response and for your tremendous efforts in bringing new, educational and engaging content to the internet. I loved manning loco cabs as an events volunteer at the NRM and it was always nice to add new knowledge from explainer and volunteer insights. The GWR combination brake is of particular interest as I did a footplate ride on 4555 last month and just couldn’t quite understand how it functioned as a steam brake as well as an ejector.
@@mcollier4566 having worked Truro and 5972 with it, challenge accepted. We're looking for more cab access volunteers at York now if you could be tempted back 😁
@@anthonycoulls7301 I’ve only had a go on 4270 and Erlestoke Manor to date, both of which have a separate ejector. Everything makes sense with the combination brake up to the point where you disconnect the vac bags and can use it as a steam brake! I’d love to come back and help out, albeit on a fairly infrequent basis as I now live and work in the Midlands. Henry Oakley was my last regular steed and despite knowing very little about diesels I always found the Deltic very interesting. Always hoped for Lode Star. Maybe one day!
Imagine if the chronology had been slightly different....if Churchward had taken charge slightly later. Suppose that he had got the GWR to buy deGlehn / du Bousquet 4-6-0s instead of Atlantics. Compounds that could climb Dainton with a decent load. Could have totally changed the direction of British locomotive development.
I cannot now unhear “lubs per squinch”
It's a handsome thing isn't it? Even more so in person. Must admit i never really used to 'get' the GWR thing - felf a bit like tbe railway hipsters liking the 'real' engines rather than those mainstream ones, but with more appreciation of the engineering and hisfory they were very important trendsetters.
Excellent❤
As an American who may never visit the UK due to a fear of flying, I love this series. Could y’all review the Chinese 4-8-4 sometime?
The Chinese 4-6-4 is a British Export that came back home, which is why it is here
@@NJPurling I’m aware.
@@Train_Tok_Man Just curious about your interest. Have you seen images of 'The Agenoria'. It did do thirty years work, which is clear in the wear of the wheel tyres. Made by Foster Rastrick & Co 1829 as was 'Stourbridge Lion'.
'Stourbridge Lion' deserved a better opportunity to shine after it's arrival in the USA. But it needed an iron railroad.
@@NJPurling Pretty sure all that’s left of that engine is just its boiler sadly. But there is a replica on display somewhere I believe.
The Queen Mary 2 still sails from New York to Southampton multiple times a year.
I wonder why Swindon didn't re-fit brass beadings to the splashers when preparing it for display in 1962? They removed the outside steam pipes and fitted a tall safety valve casing to present a pre WW1 appearance.
As for steaming certain locomotives again there are some that are out of the question now. Even though they did get revived after the end of BR steam in 1968.
The GNR 'Single', the Midland 'Compound'. You can add 'Green Arrow' and Lode Star too.
The GNR loco has a very poor firebox & the driving wheel tyre is at scrapping thickness,. 'Green Arrow' still has its original cylinder block, which is now badly cracked. Lode Star looks to have very thin tyres all round & who knows about the state of the boiler? I don't suppose it has been surveyed.
As for 'Evening Star'... I rode behind it on the Scarborough Spa Express which was many years ago. The locomotive is the 3rd newest steam locomotive in Britain & was never thrashed on freight trains, which was what it was designed for. On the modern railway a speed limit may apply on account of it having smaller driving wheels, but it definitely has the low-down grunt.
Evening Star is never going out on the mainline again (or any other 9F for that matter) as the flangeless centre driving wheels are incompatible with the raised checkrails on some modern points. Risk of the wheel riding up on the checkrail and derailing the loco.
@richardharrold9736 Being the only locomotive in preservation outshopped by Swindon, it will never be considered for steaming, that has always been the line of the museum.
@richardharrold9736 just because you don't like the answer doesn't make it nonsense, the T3 was in poor mechanical condition totally different, but now made possible by technology advancements. There's only is one ex works Swindon loco remaining, and after over 60 years, while no longer pristine, it still is original, and will be remaining so for as long as it can be left. not everything in the collection should steam again, and there's already plenty for the brasso fans to enjoy.
One of the class members is 4002 “Evening Star” the locomotive built before Lode Star
10:44 Hang on, isn’t that duke of Gloucester cab on the ground?
does seem to be the right number to be that loco yes.
Yes, it is. A mock up made in the early 1950s
It looks like a saint locomotive
Great video, I was wondering how the inner cylinders were connected to the drive wheels?
I'm glad I never had to work on one but its a beautiful machine. Elegant as were all its followers. Nice explanations .:I believe lode' is an old Norse word meaning 'the north' or 'Pole' star. ?-)
I honestly never understood why these locomotives had such a short cab, in a country well known for its bad weather
Lode Star's trailing pair of driving wheels are of a different (later) pattern to the leading and middle pair. The trailing wheels are from the "Castle" class with webbing reinforcement and the crankpin is between the spokes, whereas the other four driving wheels have the crankpin in line with the spoke and have no webbing. It's likely the trailing pair were swapped in when Lode Star was being cosmetically restored following withdrawal.
Closer examination of the number stampings on the wheel hubs should show which engine previously had the trailing pair.
Great Western engines: *aren’t fitted with domes*
Gordon The Big Engine: “and I took that personally!”
There appears to be a tap on the lower left smokebox front... what might it used for...?
It's a steam take off and cock for a steam lance, could be used for cleaning using steam
Tea.
It's a steam lance cock.
It's a steam valve, locomotive cleaners used to connect a steam Lance to it, this was used to clean out the boiler tubes
@@stuarteasthope3048 Thx for the info!
A worthwhile enhancment would be to replace corks with a proper closure with a hinged cap with projecting lug which could be opened with the spout of the oil can. This is a standard fitment on Swedish steam locos.
More modern engines used hinged caps, this engine pre dates that though and has no plans to be steamed again
The cork had the advantage that, if it fell out, it would cause no damage to the motion. The reed was actually unnecessary - other railways used corks and found there was no problem with oil flow.
Pleaee cover Cheltenham, we already miss her at the watercress
That'll be one for my colleague Thomas to do, he's a Southern devotee 😊
Oh, so this has an inverse Gresley conjugated valve gear!
Also question I’ve had for a long time, why do most brake handles have the drilled holes in them?
Very well made video as per usual , now Cheltenham is back please keep her in as last ran BR green ,also any chance one day of seeing Mallard in as last ran BR green even if for a year only
Can we see a video on the beautiful Livingston Thompson. To represent the Narrow Gauge audience??
Are the drives for the engines on each side diametrically opposed, or quartered?
Any chance of this loco steaming again?
What was the first steam locomotive in Britain to go from the form of Rocket to the grandeur of such locomotives as Lode Star?
For the next Curator with a camera can you please do GNR (Great northern railway sterling single no1
The directors asked Churchward why his locomotive cost twice as much as those of one of their competitors. His retort was that one of his would pull two of theirs backwards.
As I noted in the film
Where is the brass splasher beading??
What's above the pit now that lode star has moved?
Is all that gleaming steel chromium alloy? What kept these parts from rusting?
Nice to know about Lode Star wonder if she will ever steam again
Although It'd be nice, it's Unlikely, as the Engine already owns Several Operational Engines, Cheltenham, Sir Lamiel, Flying Scotsman, etc
@@TheSudrianTerrier653while seeing the Star work again is a tantalising idea, she is simply too good to steam. The restoration to museum (as built - they went above and beyond!) condition was carried out at Swindon works by artisans who serviced her in regular service - this can never be repeated as the works are no more, those people gone, remaining tools scrapped or dispersed. Returning the Star to steam would require strip down and servicing, new parts etc and after being used for 10years would require another strip down for continued operation/ restoring to museum condition. This would erase the efforts by those at Swindon. There are plenty of Star derivatives (Castles) which still go and let the Star be enjoyed and looked after in the NRM
There was a list of National Collection engines that had steamed at one time or other, whilst others had never steamed, but were now considered too old or unviable to risk steaming - for example, the Compound, the GNR Single, the D-class, the J17, J69, Aerolite, the Dean Goods and 9400. That also includes Mallard, Evening Star and Green Arrow. Likewise Lode Star which I understood to have flaws in one or more of the cylinder castings.
@@smhorseIt has had the outside steam pipes removed but still has the new post 1949 cylinders
It’s very unlikely to steam again, as prior to its preservation it was cosmetically (at least, but that’s another story) overhauled at Swindon and still carries the same paint job, and as a way to preserve/honour their work it’s how it will remain as any attempts to overhaul it mechanically will require a new paint job at the end.
What’s her boiler like?
It’s kinda surprising they didn’t put the valve gear on the outside , with bell cranks driving the inside cylinders, reversing the layout.
LMS did that but it didn't fit the GWR aesthetic. GWR only used outside valve gear on the 1500 class pannier rank, I think - and that was just before nationalisation.
@@rogercantwell3622 They also used outside gear on the three 2-foot gauge 2-6-2 tanks they built for the Vale of Rheidol railway in 1923/4.
But will it ever run again?
These days someone will probably build a new one . .
@@chrisburton9645
Possibly using the chassis of Castle 7027 which has lost its boiler to construct a replica 4700 class.
Never trust Domeless engines said a voice.
If there was no dome, how did they get steam out without risk of water coming out too ?
I think the tapered boiler overcame that problem.
@@northstar1950 thanks
Why would it float
I take it the "king" class was developed from this ?
Eventually . . .
It was put through the Swindon Works photocopier.
Castles first, then Kings.
Good suggestion, get the model railway people displaying, , wealth of scale history, stations, and stimulate the young more there size, history need new converts,
George Jackson Churchward not Churchwood
Is that an issue in the subtitles? We can check that out if so
Why were some railways right- hand drive and others left-hand drive ... why not standardize driver position like they standardized the track gauge? Any advantages to left-hand verse right-hand positions?
Individual railways generally had a standardized side for driving, so would have all their engines manufactured that way. However there are always exceptions.
In Victoria, Australia the government railway, Victorian Railways, drove on the left side on the Broad Gauge. The narrow gauge line due to the first engines being imported from America were right hand drive as were all the locally made copies. When two additional engines were bought from Beyer Peacock, Garratt engines G41 & G42 they were also right hand drive.
Does it really make a difference. Maybe. But with a tank engine when half the time you are going bunker first, you are then on the opposite side of the cab. If you have a second person in the cab they are also responsible for looking for signals and collecting and delivering safe working tokens as required. The biggest obstacle is sight lines due to boiler or tender or hoods.
I think it was to do with what side the signals and signs were on but I could be wrong
@@Kevin-go2dw thank you
RHD is easier for most firemen when it comes to accurately placing the coal onto the grate but means they have to help look out for signals, which are almost always on the left. The other big three railways settled on LHD, with many locos being converted from RHD - like Flying Scotsman - but the GWR always did its own thing.
@@terrier_productions Yes that is part of it, more so for express or high speed running. On "branch lines" probably not as important, nor where turning facilities were not available.
One loco that should be restored to steam.
Ditching Brussels gauge was a mistake but not as bad as new Zealand going for a very narrow gauge.
I must disagree completely. 3ft 6" is not a 'very narrow gauge', and was carefully considered and ultimately the ideal choice, given the nature of our terrain and the economics concerned. It was a wise choice, not a 'bad' one.
@@shaunbolton4662 Same in South Africa - a once huge 3ft 6in network, with fast heavy trains worked by the massive 15F and 25C/NC locos.
Why is it looking so dirty and scruffy?. I was lucky enough to being allowed to stand on the footplate, 40 years ago on a quiet morning in the old Swindon museum. I also had a photo of my father and his father(who was a GW driver) standing next to the cab of Lode Star at about 1930 when they were on their way to Portsmouth, on holiday. but my father, who was 11 at the time didnt know where the photo was taken.
The varnish on the paint is failing and that results in the loss of gloss finish. Nice to hear your family connections and experience of the old Swindon Museum, much as I remember it around the same time.
@@anthonycoulls7301 Hi, Yes i called in there a few times back in those days, and remember the old chap who used to look after it, he was a nice guy, he let me have a good loo around it as i was building a 4mm model of it at the time
Difficult to hear the speaker through the - really annoying - music.
Wooo GWR by the dude who grew up on GWR grounds.
GWR and LNWR joint to be accurate 😁
@@anthonycoulls7301 Oh! you said on one of the Q&A videos you grew up on GWR territory. you said it when I asked if city of turo that's in steam in swindon could be looked at