I host my own email, and have been complying with those rules since forever. Its not that hard to do, and it makes perfect sense in todays world. I actually have highly similar requirements in place for anyone wanting to send mail to one of my domains because they are effective.
The things they are putting in place really help with spam and phishing. I think it is a good thing for the long run to make sure email stays safe and secure for users.
for some companies they don't know. I do have a question. If dkim and dmarc is not setup will some inbound get a bounce back? i know dkim and dmarc effects outbound, but can it cause some senders to get bounce backs? all the bounce backs we get was pointing to dkim and dmarc.
I guess that's then tough luck for all the poor people that keep using those crap services instead of a real e-mail provider. They are the ones that will be missing out important messages or not be able to stay in contacts with friends and families. If customers lose out important mails or lose contact to people they care about, maybe they will wake up and finally move somewhere else.
It significantly reduces spam, makes it much harder to fake sender addresses, and hence also significantly reduces scam and phishing related mails. If you can't use a somewhat capable mail provider, you have no business trying to send me mail. And no, I don't use any of those 'free' services, been running my personal mail server since before dialup internet became common, actually, since before the www existed, and still do. Those requirements simply make perfect sense, it is not 1990 anymore.
I host my own email, and have been complying with those rules since forever. Its not that hard to do, and it makes perfect sense in todays world. I actually have highly similar requirements in place for anyone wanting to send mail to one of my domains because they are effective.
The things they are putting in place really help with spam and phishing. I think it is a good thing for the long run to make sure email stays safe and secure for users.
All of this is known for 15 years or more.
True! But did you know it is illegal to feed pigeons on the sidewalks of San Francisco :)
for some companies they don't know. I do have a question. If dkim and dmarc is not setup will some inbound get a bounce back? i know dkim and dmarc effects outbound, but can it cause some senders to get bounce backs? all the bounce backs we get was pointing to dkim and dmarc.
@@chris-kf3hj I know from experience that google will NOT accept mail that does not comply to DKIM and DMARK. SPF can still be done though.
I guess that's then tough luck for all the poor people that keep using those crap services instead of a real e-mail provider. They are the ones that will be missing out important messages or not be able to stay in contacts with friends and families. If customers lose out important mails or lose contact to people they care about, maybe they will wake up and finally move somewhere else.
It significantly reduces spam, makes it much harder to fake sender addresses, and hence also significantly reduces scam and phishing related mails.
If you can't use a somewhat capable mail provider, you have no business trying to send me mail. And no, I don't use any of those 'free' services, been running my personal mail server since before dialup internet became common, actually, since before the www existed, and still do. Those requirements simply make perfect sense, it is not 1990 anymore.
Maybe people should stop using 'free' spyware and actually pay for email?
Well “free” is always an enticing option. My account in gmail is just for spam anyways.
So... Proton?