The transition from Yang talking about the millions of jobs about to disappear and the question about the hat is like something out of the Hunger Games.
It clearly was. I would say inconsiderate is an even more accurate word. However I agree with Noa that it also wasn't worth using as a question on Overtime.
I never considered Yang as a legitimate candidate before. But I'm slowly changing my mind on that. I think he is thoughtful, well spoken and thinks things through before he speaks.. and that's just a few of the many things I am liking about him. I think he should run again.
Back in the run up to 2020, what excluded him from legitimacy in your perception? Certainly you were not alone in that. Also, did you have candidates at the time besides the guy who won who did appear legitimate? What were the factors that informed your perception?
@@brockmiller574 I'm curious on this as well. I was a big Yang supporter and it's always interesting to hear how ppl outside of my bubble perceived him
Hmm, so what happened? Decided to take off your ideological blinders and decided to listen for a change? Gross. Maybe don't vote until you decide to start listening 100% of the time? Thanks in advance!
I like Andrew Yang. He studies a topic before he speaks of it. In my opinion he would be a good senator. I would vote for him and I'm a registered Republican.
It will be when the elections come up. Then it will be "Biden's fault" for not stopping AI from advancing or some shit. People always find the way to blame the president, even though it's the corporations that obviously run the show.
Everytime I see Yang come back to the public spotlight, he is still consistently addressing the actual REAL issues in America. He was right about everything and points out we're wasting time everyday fighting battles between extreme Democrats and Republicans and getting further divided and further from solving our problems more effectively. Someone please get this awesome man in office! 🙌
As lil Andy yang ATTACKS " get rid of Trump" yet Yang is eatin up with abscessed TDS...Attacking and creating the great divide towards HONEST AMERICANS that support the finest POTUS ever in the history of the USA. T R U M P ..as an independent I voted for Hillary and Obama... HUGEE mistake.. someday perhaps you will see the light ..Go WOKE Go Broke !
@@noire.blackheart Where did he gaslight anyone? CS jobs will be the first to fall. I got laid off from a CS job last year. We got replaced by a chat bot.
Because he's a rich guy who would benefit from automation. I doubt anyone in his immediate family will lose a job to a machine so of course he's ok with it.
Shame that ChatGPT got glossed over. AI is a HUGE threat and also an extremely important tool we’ll want to develop and Yang could have directly connected it to UBI which we all will probably need.
As a programmer these discussions about "AI" are killing me - ChatGPT and other LLM's are not even remotely close to AGI, we need to be clearer about what we're discussing because otherwise it's prone to misinterpretation or exploitation. If you start off the discussion talking about "AI" I just instantly assume you have no idea what you're talking about.
@@hew195050 What most people are now calling "AI" is really just an extremely large language model which performs inference calculations. It's just extremely fine-tuned by humans to produce what we would expect. It's actually kind of scary how well some of this has worked, like a lot of us don't really understand why training it on certain datasets has worked so well.
Most people think of a strong AI when talking about AIs, however, any system that can use pattern recognition in order to generate new, topic relevant content, can be considered an AI. Moreover, defining AI aside, chatGPT has a major influence on the Junior developer job market. Sadly it is a problem, and as these technology and others like it continue to develop, it will effect more and more people.
The problem we have with the job market and the labor force is that we have a ton of open jobs that pay crap and treat workers like garbage, but companies are unwilling to change so they just claim "nobody wants to work" Then we have many open jobs for skilled workers, but there's a shortage of those workers because nobody has those skills. We can blame the education system, but we also need to blame companies because they won't train or groom anyone. They expect someone to walk in and have little to no onboarding and just get right to it. Then finally, we have lots of jobs out there open, people could do them, they pay well, but companies have these horrendously broken recruiting systems that drag things out forever and ever to actually finally hire somebody, and then they come in to a toxic workplace and want to leave very quickly. The reality is that too many companies had it too good when we had an overabundance of people and a shortage of jobs. It's sad even that some companies want to go back to that. The writing was on the wall after the pandemic, but companies are just living in denial and still claiming that "culture" and "in-person collaboration" are the big things, when they are not. They also still won't pay a living wage that somebody in those vicinities can live on. That, or they won't let these people be remote and go live someplace where they can afford to live on that salary. So now they want to bring in AI and just replace more people. What's going to happen when now you have a plethora of population unable to afford to buy anything? I guarantee those same companies are then going to be lobbying the government to set up socialist programs and pay these companies taxpayer money to basically give out their goods or services.
Pro life is a religious belief. Prove to me that it’s not a violation of separation of church (beliefs) and state! Forcing a religious belief on the country is a flat out violation of the separation of church and state!
“Caring about human life is a religious belief. How dare you make murder illegal!” I get that it’s not that simple, but everything about how we treat people comes back to our fundamental beliefs about the world (whether religious or humanist or whatever other term that gets at the basic philosophy you live your life based on). There are atheists that oppose abortion. My opposition of third-trimester and hesitancy about second-trimester abortion comes from my psychology classes where we talked about how fetuses do encode memory in the womb (the closest standard we have to personhood, unless you are going to claim that the average baby does not achieve personhood until 2 years of age and some people with various disabilities never reach personhood, both ideas that I reject, largely because of my religion).
@@marvinmartin4692 extreme by what measure? Roman father's could kill their underaged kids. That was only 1500 years ago. Our government is in part based on Rome. What determines ethics? If culture promotes an ideal how is it wrong?
People decided that manual labor job opportunities are many times more physically demanding and people decided after the covid lock downs those positions though many times pay well don't have overall benefits including insurance and retirement programs that support the amount of physically associated ailments that obviously come with manual labor job opportunities and so many people fell for the myth that it's better to stay home than work
@@sharonhamilton3439 People won't be king makers anymore when they only get peanuts. The Corps need labor more than laborers need jobs. We hold the power, but are just too self-interested to ever get collectively organized. UNIONS! People fell for the "right to work" myth 35 years ago.
@@brasshouse-og That's not how it worked. The VP was the first loser (came in second) of the EC vote. So wolf is correct. Under the ORIGINAL way the VP was chosen, trump would be VP right now.
True, but he's learned to hold back, submissively agree to a certain point, as a result of what all he's dealt with and dealing with since he entered politics. In the end that's a mentally unstable enforced way to keep getting the completely insane way. I thought that he would have made a great mayor of New York City, in every way, all of his innovative ideas, including his good management to be able to carry them out, and look what have gotten instead, the whole state of New York. Shameless dunces, corrupted to the core. That's what pleases Oligarchy Globalists psychopaths. If successful, he could have set a precedent for other important cities to follow in The USA, especially blue cities in most dire and drastic systemic need of change.
@@anaibarangan4908 I learned how deeply corrupted the NYC political system is by following Yang's mayoral run. It's crazy the amount of manipulation and favor trading that happened during that election. There is a lot of interest in keeping NYC corrupt. It's easier to buy out career politicians.
LOVE Elissa's comment about how (ironically) right here on RUclips, coders have absolutely designed algorithms that monetize/maximize profits based on provocative content including hate speech. They are currently not liable for their behavior.
If Dems actually cared about abortion rights the way they say they do, why didn't they pass federal legislation any of the times in the last 50 years that they had control of the executive and legislative?
That's only acceptable way this ever could be done. 1) Roe v Wade was bullshit and deserved to be struck. 2) The people want legal abortion. 3) Then write and pass a goddamn law, this is a democracy! If you can't pass the law, then you can't pass the law. That's how our system works and that's exactly how it should work.
Everyone here is complementing Yang, but he abandoned UBI. He’s not going after big corporate money in politics that causes the corruption and status quos he supposedly started the Forward Party for.
Shouldn't he get to win the next presidency simply by standing up and saying he was right about everything. Like he literally predicted the last 3 years on the campaign trail
What was he right about? He predicted that automation would cause mass unemployment, and he really thought that half of the people who lost their job because of the pandemic wouldn't get it back because of automation. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate is 3% and labor force participation is as high as it's ever been. Andrew Yang is as wrong as it is possible to be.
I worked in a call center taking inbound calls from angry customers. Bing Chat could do 99% of the calls, and abuse, I was paid to handle, based on what Ive seen it do already, given different prompts. Yang was right... its automatable today and I guarantee someones already out there working on it because right now every industry is asking themselves "how could AI save money for my business?"
Back in the late 70s at high school here in the UK I remember our teacher talking about computers. She said when we were at work we would see a revolution. Paperless offices, machines doing all the heavy hard physical work, machines and computers would mean we would all have lots more free time and would have better lifestyles and more money than any previous generation. It hasn’t worked out that way for many. We work longer hours just to pay our credit bills and live. In the next 15 years manual jobs such as working in warehouses, factories and driving heavy loads will all disappear as jobs. For many who don’t have a higher education the decent paid jobs will be out of reach meaning poverty and misery for many families. This is an issue that has been ignored by too many in the past and even now. We are heading for disaster if we don’t try and find a solution. As for the paperless office most seem to have more paper than ever in them 😔
Right now many intellectual jobs will start being replaced, more education isn't the answer. I work in a trade and I find myself surprised that my type of work is probably among the safest from robots. And in the long run we probably will be better off. JD Rockefeller was, inflation adjusted, probably the richest person to ever live and he never had so many of the luxuries that we take for granted today, let alone such innovations as antibiotics.
That's because the solution is UBI (which I'm surprised Yang didn't push here). If everyone has just enough money to live even without needing to work, then the idea is they can then use the extra time to do things that are more meaningful rather than just work to live. Machines and automation is supposed to be the answer. There are plenty of rich elites born into wealth that never had to do physical labor in their life, but not all of them are lazy slobs. Humans generally will be able to find things they want to do if they have time for it.
@@MinhVu-fl4nn The thing is such ideas as UBI, ( paid family leave, free health care, etc.) will require a MASSIVE shift in our political landscape as it stands today. Right now I just don't see that happening.
I had the same experience in high school except my teacher included a flying car. But none that l have heard included the greed of capitalism in the equation. We will have to embrace a more socialist out look if humanity is to survive. Other wise the gun nuts will have had the right idea all along and that's a future which is truly terrifying.
You're absolutely wrong - trade jobs are more important than ever right now. Skilled manual laborers are disappearing when we need them the most. Try finding a good carpenter, electrician, etc. it's hard and they charge a shit ton. These kind of jobs are not going away any time soon, they're just going out of fashion.
"If I'm a conservative, God, heal me of my thoughts that liberals are the problem. If I'm a liberal, God, heal me of my thoughts that conservatives are the problem." -Marianne Williamson
“IT’S YOUR FUCKING FAULT I’M 5 MINUTES LATE!!! I THOUGHT YOU WERE MORE COMPETENT THAN A SLOW THIRD-GRADER. . FUUUUCK!!!!” - also Marianne Williamson. Allegedly.
People will continue to have this endless discussion on poverty and unaffordability of housing and services but will never, EVER mention that wages have stagnated for multiple decades. Somehow that never gets mentioned, let's just ignore the fact that that corporations make ever more profit but do not reinvest any of it into their workforce
Customer Service is a huge issue with Chatbots. They still do not outperform a real person. I don't know what the stats say but I call when all options are exhausted. The last thing I want to hear is a automated voice. By the time I reach a human I'm peeved.
Most customer support workers are just automated humans anyway. They follow a rather strict step-by-step checklist based on the client's issue. People just _feel_ better talking to a real human being. But soon you'll be talking to a machine thinking it's an actual human without being able to tell the difference.
@@Raphael11001 Yes, many of us know they are scripted, but we can get past that false wall because they are human. The scripts aren't considering the reality of the issues. When you need a human, you need to solve a larger issue and the chatbots are unable to solve those unique circumstances. They may handle the no brainers but humans do a better job with the larger issues. Just watch the SNL sketches. Comedy mimics truth. The jury is out.
I'm not an Andrew yang fan but he ran circles around rep slotkin the entire episode, she sounded so vapid and generic compared to him, it was sad frankly.
Would be curious to hear what others think of the "no one wants to work" idea. I have been applying to tons of jobs, and every job I apply to has like 70 to 120 applicants. Serious competition. Also, for more info.....I am applying to skilled jobs, and I feel like unskilled labor that pays poorly might be hard to fill?
It is a dichotomy. There are jobs where, like you say, have too many applicants vying for one or two spots, while others are always in shortage. There are different reasons for different jobs. For instance, in jobs I have had, the problem is the applicant pool (and HR standards minimums about who we should expect to do the job). In other places, no one wants to do hard honest work. Sometimes it is because how people get treated at both kinds of jobs!
Slotkin... people should absolutely have the freedom to monetize "extremism" or "hate." What a dangerous slippery slope. Who gets to define what is extreme or hateful? Scary stuff
No, anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism! Some members of a religion can decide they're entitled to a country of their own - others disagreeing with that notion has nothing to do with the religion itself.
Jews are an ethnic group, it’s why Atheist Jews are not an oxymoron. And of course the worst genocide of Jews - and they’ve been through more than one - was racially, not religiously based. A baptized Weinstein did not escape the gas chambers. Regardless, if this were 1917 or even 1947, I could concede the point. But after the right of the Jewish People to self-determination like other ethno-national groups have been recognized by the international community, and well established for close to a century, to declare that only they must today be removed of that right is antisemitic. Unless of course you are of the opinion that other countries like Turkey, Pakistan, etc. ought to also not exist. But if the one country to which you apply this moral logic happens to be the only one where Jews are a majority, it is fair to question if there is an ulterior motive.
I think Andrew Yang and Bernie Sanders should form their own third party , with Yang being President and Sanders his Vice President, wouldn't that be something?
would have been something in 2020 and too late for 2024 but Bernie is stuck on his federal jobs guarantee and cant see past it, Yang will benefit most in the future from someone with very strong foreign policy experience
The ancient Hebrew word for "soul" literally is interchangeable with "breath", because life, according to the Bible, begins with the first breath of air.
A brief reminder that South Africa, a country with the highest unemployment rate in the world currency (29.2%) still has billionaires. So to comments of people I see laughing thinking that no way that the ultra wealthy would allow the US employment to tank because "there still needs to be people to buy things" forgets that we live in a global market and these billionaires don't care if the entire country is impoverished due to automation from AI or outsourcing. They'll always find another market somewhere else in the world. They will have us living as serfs cleaning their palaces, feeding us scraps before the end of the day. Tax them at 70, 80%. If they offshore their money, tell any country that harbors their funds they will be sanctioned by the US government for harboring funds for financial criminals evading taxation.
Fan of Yang, didn't care for Slotkin much. Watches the whole show and both dodged parts of the tougher questions but something about her I don't like. Can't quite tell what it is yet.
yang dodged questions because he wants to be productive, slotkin dodged questions because she doesn't want to face the uncomfortable truth that the democratic party side of society has series issues.
As I understand that it’s a mischaracterization to say that people are “ staying home“ and not filling these jobs that businesses are offering. Instead, people aren’t taking jobs that are terrible, or don’t pay enough. Unemployment is at a national low to my understanding. So while it could end up being a natural result, that some of these jobs that people hate doing will be taken over by something like chat GPT, I’m disappointed to hear two American political figures rattling off that people aren’t working. That is not the case. what’s happening is that people don’t want to do work for too little money to make ends meet, or for companies that have no respect for them. When I hear how companies treat people in a lot of these jobs that are minimum or close to minimum wage, it’s no wonder that they try to find any other solution to their employment problem.
@@Kinikia95 I have no doubt that they have the ability to understand it, what’s more I’m pretty sure that they actually do. I realize that they are just speaking off the cuff here, but I found it telling that they were parodying the same things that very conservative people are saying. And if they really do know this, then why are they saying that people aren’t willing to work. that’s a very different sentiment from saying people aren’t willing to do that work, or that companies aren’t paying enough to get them to do work that they don’t want to do. It’s an important distinction, and I expect more from folks who say that they are on the side of workers.
I'm definitely NOT anti Israel, but, I'm definitely not pro Israel, but not in any way for anti-Semitic reasons and I'll just leave at that. However, Noa Tshby is stunningly beautiful.
Why Is Bill Promoting Elissa Slotkin? She is often on the show - just to promote her Senate run? Have NEVER heard her often a fresh perspective on anything.
@@hew195050 How do you feel about non-profit organizations that bring in millions of dollars each year? Should they lose their status to or do you just hold that opinion against institutions you dislike?
On the abortion issue: I'm boycotting Walgreen's. Boycotts work. I'll boycott any pharmacy that says they won't distribute legally-prescribed abortion pills. That's one thing we can all do on this issue right now.
There's an assumption you're making that seems evidently false that Jewish people can't exist outside the state of Israel. I would like an explanation as to why anti-Zionism is antisemitic. It seems like a very arbitrary but convenient boundary that the commentator set. Or perhaps it reveals a weakness in the argument for the creation of the state of Israel: let's just call those that have a contrary idea prejudiced. With that said, I think it's a huge stretch to argue that today the state of Israel shouldn't exist.
@@cutinhas I am protestant from Germany with specific knowledge of european and german history and I know for a fact, although Jewish people can exist outside the state of Israel, they are sadly NEVER as safe and accepted as regular citizens as in Israel, due to permanent vulgar antisemitism and long time systemic anti-semitism. Recently the german institutions celebrated 1700 years of jewish life in the borders of todays Germany. And although they have contributed so much to the country and it's culture for centuries they have been purposely treated badly since then. And I mean besides the uncounted progroms and the years between 1933-1945: In medieaval times hey have been "under protection" of the King of the Holy Roman Empire as personal belongings (THINGS!!! not humans) in order to get squeezed out with extraordinary taxes. The complete city-wall of cologne was built with extra tax-payments only of the jewish population. Martin Luther wrote wide-spread rants against all jews after they refused to convert to Lutherism and wanted them to burn. Guilds, clubs, parties: "No jews allowed!". Kaiser Wilhelm ranted against jews: "I think the best would be gas." Walter Rathenau was one of the most important politicians of the Weimar Republic and killed by right-extremist antisemites. Please look up, what happened in Halle 2019. Theodor Herzl was right.
@@AugaAuf By that logic denying the State of Palestine to exists is also anti-Semitic. Seeing as Arabs are also Semitic, that's is if you actually use the definition of Semitic to the T.
Thank you for being up the seriousness of the abortion issue in our country. Glad the Michigan representative told the story of her constituents saying “I’m pro-life but I don’t want to tell other women what to do”. I hear this so often. My issue and response is “but you ARE telling woman what to do with their bodies when you vote for pro-life candidates.” Pick a legal side! Your religious opinion is irrelevant. We are talking about laws that control women’s bodies. You can’t play both sides. Grown a spine and fight for women’s rights to OWN their bodies.
I love Andrew yang, he's got my vote. He's 100% right. He was a killer on the show Friday. 44% of Americans don't vote. -46% of the people who don't vote because they don't like either candidate, don't feel represented, or feel like their vote won't make a difference. - The female Democrat HAS to defend her party and the system bc if she didn't she would be shooting herself and her chances in the foot. -Andrew Yang during the last election phase was the only candidate to speak out about important issues. +UBI (universal base income) + Ai and how AI will effect the the job sector VERY shortly. + All the whole he never seemed off base, flighty, redirected, + He will never be a primary candidate because he actually makes sense, talks about important issues, and wants to get things done.
"I think he (Trump) is going to arrive on all these (social media) platforms and we'll all be collectively dumber for it." Andrew Yang for the obvious score!
Being anti-Israel in government, policy, or Netanyahu, is not being anti-Semite. Thank you, Rep. Elissa Slotkin, for saying that. I am anti-abortion but pro-choice. It's up to the pregnant female whether she wants to abort a pregnancy or not.
Not exactly sure of your point. The next election cycle is 2024 - you know these things are every 2 years, right? The case is being heard in the current SC term. And they decide what cases they hear. So, according to you, any case they hear would be "right before the next election cycle". How or when should they hear them to meet your standards of not being in an election cycle?
"Nobody starves in America. The problem is the opposite. There are places that they can always go to get food... and they don't starve." That's really ignorant, Bill. You have a big platform, and you should better educate yourself. #hungercliff
Anti-Zionism is NOT anti-Semitism. I am a pro-Semite with a great respect for the Jewish religion, people and history. I am also an anti-Zionist. I care about the treatment of the Palestinian people, and the state of Israel is both territorially aggressive and an apartheid government which denies equal rights to non-Jewish citizens.
You can be a zionist and still care about the treatment of Palestinians. And non Jewish citizens have the exact same rights as Jewish citizens in Israel. In fact the previous government that unseated Netanyahu included an Arab/Palestinian, Islamic party.
Yoga Chick that is an unbelievably stupid comment . Ignorant too. Anti Zionism means you think we don't desrve a home, that we should continue to be attacked by others. Arabs living within the SOI have the same rights as Jews which sadly is not the same for Jews and other minorities that have the misfortune to live in Arab countries. Like the Copts in Egypt, Yazidis in Iran, Zoroastrians.
I wonder how the anti-Zionist test would hold up if applied analogously to the conflict in Kashmir. Which religion gets first dibs? Which religion gets higher status when the conflict is about territory? Does finders keepers really basically become the answer? Or can you interrupt that with a higher claim? I don't really know the answer.
It actually is. Until the first breath, the fetus is a parasite, requiring the host to breathe, eat and remove waste for it. The first breath is the beginning of being an actual unique being. I assume you never took university level biology.
Was this audience given whippets before taping? Between the shrill laughter and the stupid questions it’s clear they’re on something. Also, to the Israeli lady giving her opinion about how the US should run its elections: why not worry about your own country first?
So many good things about this show, but the overtimes are often unbalanced like this one. There one was a TV satirical skit in Germany called, Two Chairs (Guests), One Opinion. It made fun of TV discussions where the participants all held the same or similar beliefs, and no one offered counterarguments.
Proud Michigander, proud of Slotkin for all that she said, proud of MI for passing Prop 3 last November to keep our reproductive rights, and proud to have worked on the campaign!
Call centres whose staff will answer your concerns about a product or service? Keep them and make more. I HATE automated help lines. Call centres whose staff are paid to call you during dinner to sell you crypto or timeshares? I hope they all implode and the owners go to debtor's jail.
As long as the company stays private. The st Louis zoo is free. Used to just walk in but with covid you have to register online. So now citizens need a phone to go to the zoo their taxes pay for? If I need RUclips for example to access a presidential debate in the future what happens if I banned from their platform? I am banned from the Democratic process.
The 1st amendment says the government shall not write any law that abridges free speech. Any government banning books is a direct violation of the 1st amendment. Don't like you can't post hateful incorrect nonsense on RUclips then go to a platform that allows it.
@@JellyBean-lo4sl And who decides what is hateful?........or incorrect since it seems people think their opinions are truth nowadays........Nonsense can be a matter of interpretation depending on intention. Much of what is considered comedy can by others be considered nonsense. You really need to spend some time thinking about your willingness to shut others down based on your feelings. The core of the issue is that U-Tube, like many other platforms, is a venue for public discourse. As a private company they can certainly make policies on what is allowed. Those decisions need to be applied uniformly though and individuals with differences of opinion must be allowed their speech equally if it does not violate fairly applied policies. Anything else is a violation of rights under the constitution.
@@Zaekyr - sweetie, I'm not the one banning books because they hurt my racist, homophobic, xenophobic, scared of everyone who doesn't look like me feelings. Come out of the basement and stop smelling your own farts already.
Bill's comment about I just read the question just like talk to somebody home Depot I just work here I don't know anyting I'm not involved I just work here
The transition from Yang talking about the millions of jobs about to disappear and the question about the hat is like something out of the Hunger Games.
Andrew is great. He has always great comments.
No one is willing to say plainly that it was obviously rude for that lady to wear that big dress at the Oscars.
Yeah thats totally gross. That lady knew that she was going to block others view. It shows that she just only thinks about herself.
Sure, but to be mocked across the world. Might be a bit much.
@@mokilokenot enough you mean
Slotkin's idea was the best: make the stupid hat collapsible.
It clearly was. I would say inconsiderate is an even more accurate word. However I agree with Noa that it also wasn't worth using as a question on Overtime.
I never considered Yang as a legitimate candidate before. But I'm slowly changing my mind on that. I think he is thoughtful, well spoken and thinks things through before he speaks.. and that's just a few of the many things I am liking about him. I think he should run again.
Yeah you're right, he's very intelligible and cares of the people
Back in the run up to 2020, what excluded him from legitimacy in your perception? Certainly you were not alone in that. Also, did you have candidates at the time besides the guy who won who did appear legitimate? What were the factors that informed your perception?
@@brockmiller574 I'm curious on this as well. I was a big Yang supporter and it's always interesting to hear how ppl outside of my bubble perceived him
I agree.he is very intelligent and he is able to see more than one side of an issue.
Hmm, so what happened? Decided to take off your ideological blinders and decided to listen for a change? Gross. Maybe don't vote until you decide to start listening 100% of the time? Thanks in advance!
I like Andrew Yang. He studies a topic before he speaks of it. In my opinion he would be a good senator. I would vote for him and I'm a registered Republican.
Even for ubi?
@@joetatoesniff9525 UBI is a net benefit for the economy.
@JoetatoeSniff because corporate bailouts and subsidies are so much different right? 🙄
Universal income is socialism
lol.. not voting for pro censorship, sorry
Thanks for having Yang on the show, Bill.
I think Yang is a great guy, eloquent speaker, highly educated and caring person!
He also shoots whipped cream inside mouths of men.
i'd rather have yin.
He's a waste of everyone's time. Just hot air searching for an intelligent thought.
#YangGang
Why so afraid for them to say the actress was rude and self centre? Yes more important things to discuss but this could have been simply.
That Noah Tishby lady is the self centered Hollywood elite that people always talk about.
Overtime is too short. Needs 15mins
Indeed. Too bad their corporate daddy said no.
@@divinedemonj It was this short before CNN started airing it.
Sheeiit, it needs to be a full hour! Get deeper in to the topics.
@@dwaynehendricks7842
sometimes the initial interview segment needs to be one hour.
Some companies laying of 40% of their workforce is pretty crazy. I’m surprised that’s not a bigger talking point.
It will be when the elections come up. Then it will be "Biden's fault" for not stopping AI from advancing or some shit. People always find the way to blame the president, even though it's the corporations that obviously run the show.
Everytime I see Yang come back to the public spotlight, he is still consistently addressing the actual REAL issues in America. He was right about everything and points out we're wasting time everyday fighting battles between extreme Democrats and Republicans and getting further divided and further from solving our problems more effectively. Someone please get this awesome man in office! 🙌
As lil Andy yang ATTACKS " get rid of Trump" yet Yang is eatin up with abscessed TDS...Attacking and creating the great divide towards HONEST AMERICANS that support the finest POTUS ever in the history of the USA. T R U M P ..as an independent I voted for Hillary and Obama... HUGEE mistake.. someday perhaps you will see the light ..Go WOKE Go Broke !
Yang understands what’s really happening.
Not really. He's just gaslighting everyone for grift as per his usual tactic. He's no genius.
@@noire.blackheart He does not rely on demonization, and gets into some practical world detail. Also he doesn't cater to the lowest impulses.
@@benjamingruder4875what do you mean? He just catered to the lowest impulses of the audience in this video.
@@vinegarpisser2992 He did not target a group to hate. That would have been catering the lowest impulses.
@@noire.blackheart Where did he gaslight anyone? CS jobs will be the first to fall. I got laid off from a CS job last year. We got replaced by a chat bot.
Great comments on all issues. I love how Andrew Yang is always looking forward to the consequences of technology advances.
Yang has been warning us for years.
You’re a simple man.
Yang is an inspiration. Would love to see him have some political power. Yang gang.
@@mokiloke yangs wangs
Because he's a rich guy who would benefit from automation. I doubt anyone in his immediate family will lose a job to a machine so of course he's ok with it.
Andrew Yang is very reasonable.
Wow it’s like you shouldn’t be commenting or voting
Yeah I thought he had some ideas before, now he just sounds crazy
His panel wasn't my favorite people
I like him a lot! I actually supported him in the Iowa Caucasus this previous election
Totally 💯
Shame that ChatGPT got glossed over. AI is a HUGE threat and also an extremely important tool we’ll want to develop and Yang could have directly connected it to UBI which we all will probably need.
Andrew yang is great - very bright bloke
As a programmer these discussions about "AI" are killing me - ChatGPT and other LLM's are not even remotely close to AGI, we need to be clearer about what we're discussing because otherwise it's prone to misinterpretation or exploitation. If you start off the discussion talking about "AI" I just instantly assume you have no idea what you're talking about.
ChatGPT sucks. It literally did basic addition wrong and passed it off like there wasnt any error. Dumb af
Please explain more. I'm a novice and I'm interested in what you're saying.
@@hew195050 What most people are now calling "AI" is really just an extremely large language model which performs inference calculations. It's just extremely fine-tuned by humans to produce what we would expect. It's actually kind of scary how well some of this has worked, like a lot of us don't really understand why training it on certain datasets has worked so well.
Totally, it’s the cringiest thing listening to an noob talk about GPT
Most people think of a strong AI when talking about AIs, however, any system that can use pattern recognition in order to generate new, topic relevant content, can be considered an AI.
Moreover, defining AI aside, chatGPT has a major influence on the Junior developer job market. Sadly it is a problem, and as these technology and others like it continue to develop, it will effect more and more people.
The problem we have with the job market and the labor force is that we have a ton of open jobs that pay crap and treat workers like garbage, but companies are unwilling to change so they just claim "nobody wants to work"
Then we have many open jobs for skilled workers, but there's a shortage of those workers because nobody has those skills. We can blame the education system, but we also need to blame companies because they won't train or groom anyone. They expect someone to walk in and have little to no onboarding and just get right to it.
Then finally, we have lots of jobs out there open, people could do them, they pay well, but companies have these horrendously broken recruiting systems that drag things out forever and ever to actually finally hire somebody, and then they come in to a toxic workplace and want to leave very quickly.
The reality is that too many companies had it too good when we had an overabundance of people and a shortage of jobs. It's sad even that some companies want to go back to that. The writing was on the wall after the pandemic, but companies are just living in denial and still claiming that "culture" and "in-person collaboration" are the big things, when they are not. They also still won't pay a living wage that somebody in those vicinities can live on. That, or they won't let these people be remote and go live someplace where they can afford to live on that salary.
So now they want to bring in AI and just replace more people. What's going to happen when now you have a plethora of population unable to afford to buy anything?
I guarantee those same companies are then going to be lobbying the government to set up socialist programs and pay these companies taxpayer money to basically give out their goods or services.
well said mr alex !! now if only our 'leaders' (besides bernie) will understand that and find ways to make it better ..
@@MrVandj1 but they do get it !! large 'donation's' to stay in power come on a regular basis ..
Spot on!
👏👏👏👏
@@direwolf6234 I'm so sick of Bernie sanders supporters I could puke.
Not everyone believes in Jesus Christ, nor do we feel " less than" because we don't kneel and pray to a statue....
Okay?
Pro life is a religious belief. Prove to me that it’s not a violation of separation of church (beliefs) and state! Forcing a religious belief on the country is a flat out violation of the separation of church and state!
yes .. don't force your stuff on me ....
“Caring about human life is a religious belief. How dare you make murder illegal!” I get that it’s not that simple, but everything about how we treat people comes back to our fundamental beliefs about the world (whether religious or humanist or whatever other term that gets at the basic philosophy you live your life based on). There are atheists that oppose abortion. My opposition of third-trimester and hesitancy about second-trimester abortion comes from my psychology classes where we talked about how fetuses do encode memory in the womb (the closest standard we have to personhood, unless you are going to claim that the average baby does not achieve personhood until 2 years of age and some people with various disabilities never reach personhood, both ideas that I reject, largely because of my religion).
So parents can kill their children? Why not? They aren't adults yet. Without using morals, explain.
Wow talk about going over the cliff with extreme conclusions! Wow!
@@marvinmartin4692 extreme by what measure? Roman father's could kill their underaged kids. That was only 1500 years ago. Our government is in part based on Rome. What determines ethics? If culture promotes an ideal how is it wrong?
#YangGang 🤟🏻
It wasn’t right for her to block their view. She should have taken it off. Just out of good manners. I thought it was rude.
Slotkin is ignoring the fact that most of the jobs that aren't getting filled is bc the jobs suck and the pay is worse.
People decided that manual labor job opportunities are many times more physically demanding and people decided after the covid lock downs those positions though many times pay well don't have overall benefits including insurance and retirement programs that support the amount of physically associated ailments that obviously come with manual labor job opportunities and so many people fell for the myth that it's better to stay home than work
@@sharonhamilton3439 People won't be king makers anymore when they only get peanuts. The Corps need labor more than laborers need jobs. We hold the power, but are just too self-interested to ever get collectively organized. UNIONS! People fell for the "right to work" myth 35 years ago.
It would actually be a good idea to make the runner up be VP.
what runner up ?? then trump would be VP ??
@@direwolf6234 no, the leading democrat behind Biden. I believe that would have been Bernie.
@@brasshouse-og ok got it ... however few would run knowing they's be VP .. might as well stay as a senator or governor
@@brasshouse-og That's not how it worked. The VP was the first loser (came in second) of the EC vote. So wolf is correct. Under the ORIGINAL way the VP was chosen, trump would be VP right now.
@@direwolf6234 Brass gave you incorrect information. Whatever you "got" from him, I hope a shot of penicillin clears it up.
Yang is on a different level than these airheads.
Sexist. Why call the women airheads? Yang talks in bumper stickers.
True, but he's learned to hold back, submissively agree to a certain point, as a result of what all he's dealt with and dealing with since he entered politics. In the end that's a mentally unstable enforced way to keep getting the completely insane way. I thought that he would have made a great mayor of New York City, in every way, all of his innovative ideas, including his good management to be able to carry them out, and look what have gotten instead, the whole state of New York. Shameless dunces, corrupted to the core. That's what pleases Oligarchy Globalists psychopaths. If successful, he could have set a precedent for other important cities to follow in The USA, especially blue cities in most dire and drastic systemic need of change.
@@anaibarangan4908 I learned how deeply corrupted the NYC political system is by following Yang's mayoral run. It's crazy the amount of manipulation and favor trading that happened during that election. There is a lot of interest in keeping NYC corrupt. It's easier to buy out career politicians.
Your guest from Israel is pretty.
LOVE Elissa's comment about how (ironically) right here on RUclips, coders have absolutely designed algorithms that monetize/maximize profits based on provocative content including hate speech. They are currently not liable for their behavior.
Yeah that’s the thread to pull on for the right and left to find common ground. Big tech needs accountability, not protection.
Yang should be president
Of every country!!!
in a perfect world. people are too stupid to vote for him.
If Dems actually cared about abortion rights the way they say they do, why didn't they pass federal legislation any of the times in the last 50 years that they had control of the executive and legislative?
They obviously don't care like republicans don't care about Obamacare.
That's only acceptable way this ever could be done.
1) Roe v Wade was bullshit and deserved to be struck.
2) The people want legal abortion.
3) Then write and pass a goddamn law, this is a democracy!
If you can't pass the law, then you can't pass the law. That's how our system works and that's exactly how it should work.
At the 9-minute mark Slotkin sounds like she is against the 1st Amendment. Very troubling.
Because she is.
Democrats are pro censorship by using government agencies colluding with social media platforms to suppress free speech
Very troubling and she just lost my vote. I was kind of sick of her anyway.
Everyone here is complementing Yang, but he abandoned UBI. He’s not going after big corporate money in politics that causes the corruption and status quos he supposedly started the Forward Party for.
Shouldn't he get to win the next presidency simply by standing up and saying he was right about everything. Like he literally predicted the last 3 years on the campaign trail
We are too glazed over to ever vote for someone honest who really wants thing to get better.
Who is he?
@@svscared yang.
What was he right about? He predicted that automation would cause mass unemployment, and he really thought that half of the people who lost their job because of the pandemic wouldn't get it back because of automation. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate is 3% and labor force participation is as high as it's ever been. Andrew Yang is as wrong as it is possible to be.
Sorry but even putting bots in control of responses when customers are pissed abt a sky high bill is not going to work.
but it will, people will be yelling at bots, bots will get hurt feelings and endlife on earth....pretty much what's happening here on YT.
I worked in a call center taking inbound calls from angry customers. Bing Chat could do 99% of the calls, and abuse, I was paid to handle, based on what Ive seen it do already, given different prompts. Yang was right... its automatable today and I guarantee someones already out there working on it because right now every industry is asking themselves "how could AI save money for my business?"
If the businesses can save money, they'll do it. They don't care about their customers
Putting a fat psychological and emotional basket case on that call to promptly have a nervous breakdown is a better option?
@@julessaviour5931 Other way around. If the customers can save money, they'll do it. They don't care about the workers.
Vice President is often not who the president thinks is the best option it's political negotiations behind the scenes.
Like Obama really thought Biden was the best choice. He needed an old white man.
Excellent conversation!
Back in the late 70s at high school here in the UK I remember our teacher talking about computers.
She said when we were at work we would see a revolution.
Paperless offices, machines doing all the heavy hard physical work, machines and computers would mean we would all have lots more free time and would have better lifestyles and more money than any previous generation.
It hasn’t worked out that way for many.
We work longer hours just to pay our credit bills and live.
In the next 15 years manual jobs such as working in warehouses, factories and driving heavy loads will all disappear as jobs.
For many who don’t have a higher education the decent paid jobs will be out of reach meaning poverty and misery for many families.
This is an issue that has been ignored by too many in the past and even now.
We are heading for disaster if we don’t try and find a solution.
As for the paperless office most seem to have more paper than ever in them 😔
Right now many intellectual jobs will start being replaced, more education isn't the answer. I work in a trade and I find myself surprised that my type of work is probably among the safest from robots.
And in the long run we probably will be better off. JD Rockefeller was, inflation adjusted, probably the richest person to ever live and he never had so many of the luxuries that we take for granted today, let alone such innovations as antibiotics.
That's because the solution is UBI (which I'm surprised Yang didn't push here). If everyone has just enough money to live even without needing to work, then the idea is they can then use the extra time to do things that are more meaningful rather than just work to live. Machines and automation is supposed to be the answer. There are plenty of rich elites born into wealth that never had to do physical labor in their life, but not all of them are lazy slobs. Humans generally will be able to find things they want to do if they have time for it.
@@MinhVu-fl4nn The thing is such ideas as UBI, ( paid family leave, free health care, etc.) will require a MASSIVE shift in our political landscape as it stands today. Right now I just don't see that happening.
I had the same experience in high school except my teacher included a flying car. But none that l have heard included the greed of capitalism in the equation. We will have to embrace a more socialist out look if humanity is to survive. Other wise the gun nuts will have had the right idea all along and that's a future which is truly terrifying.
You're absolutely wrong - trade jobs are more important than ever right now. Skilled manual laborers are disappearing when we need them the most. Try finding a good carpenter, electrician, etc. it's hard and they charge a shit ton. These kind of jobs are not going away any time soon, they're just going out of fashion.
"If I'm a conservative, God,
heal me of my thoughts
that liberals are the problem.
If I'm a liberal, God, heal me
of my thoughts that
conservatives are the problem."
-Marianne Williamson
“IT’S YOUR FUCKING FAULT I’M 5 MINUTES LATE!!! I THOUGHT YOU WERE MORE COMPETENT THAN A SLOW THIRD-GRADER. . FUUUUCK!!!!”
- also Marianne Williamson. Allegedly.
Andrew Yang hits on every point👏🏾😎🤙🏾
What Slotkin’s “pro-life” constituent said about abortion, is the definition of pro-choice.
Which is why republican messaging is pro-life vs pro-abortion.
Democrats need to frame pro-life as anti-choice.
What we need is an organization called D.R.A.G. - Disciples Reading Apostolic Gospel. This way it’s literally Drag Story Hour.
People will continue to have this endless discussion on poverty and unaffordability of housing and services but will never, EVER mention that wages have stagnated for multiple decades. Somehow that never gets mentioned, let's just ignore the fact that that corporations make ever more profit but do not reinvest any of it into their workforce
Our Supreme Court resembles something out of the 18th Century
Good because the idea is a really from the ancient world. Glad we made it look young and hip.
Yes, because of all the Jews, women, blacks and Latins on the 18th Century Supreme Court.
@@silencemeviolateme6076 wait until there are religious police like in Iran. Ass-backwards the USA
Customer Service is a huge issue with Chatbots. They still do not outperform a real person. I don't know what the stats say but I call when all options are exhausted. The last thing I want to hear is a automated voice. By the time I reach a human I'm peeved.
Customer service is disgusting now. Verizon is a nightmare. I'm sure they hope people give up.
Most customer support workers are just automated humans anyway. They follow a rather strict step-by-step checklist based on the client's issue. People just _feel_ better talking to a real human being. But soon you'll be talking to a machine thinking it's an actual human without being able to tell the difference.
@@Raphael11001 Yes, many of us know they are scripted, but we can get past that false wall because they are human. The scripts aren't considering the reality of the issues. When you need a human, you need to solve a larger issue and the chatbots are unable to solve those unique circumstances. They may handle the no brainers but humans do a better job with the larger issues. Just watch the SNL sketches. Comedy mimics truth. The jury is out.
You tell ‘‘em Andrew Yang!! I’m a Republican who believes in you!!!
Who remembers Oliver Stone’s movie advert where he held up the smart phone and said this will be the end of us?
The jobs she is speaking about are 10/hr with bad schedules . People don’t want to have that job.
I'm not an Andrew yang fan but he ran circles around rep slotkin the entire episode, she sounded so vapid and generic compared to him, it was sad frankly.
I know. I've seen him do this multiple times in the past -- it's always brilliant to watch
Perfect summation.
I thought they both did well. I'm never a fan of having to tear someone down in order to build someone else up.
Would be curious to hear what others think of the "no one wants to work" idea. I have been applying to tons of jobs, and every job I apply to has like 70 to 120 applicants. Serious competition.
Also, for more info.....I am applying to skilled jobs, and I feel like unskilled labor that pays poorly might be hard to fill?
It is a dichotomy. There are jobs where, like you say, have too many applicants vying for one or two spots, while others are always in shortage. There are different reasons for different jobs. For instance, in jobs I have had, the problem is the applicant pool (and HR standards minimums about who we should expect to do the job). In other places, no one wants to do hard honest work. Sometimes it is because how people get treated at both kinds of jobs!
Andrew Yang should run again with the slogan "I told you so"
A party that doesn't know what a woman is can't be taken seriously.
It's past the time to vote out the Uniparty/Duopoly
Slotkin... people should absolutely have the freedom to monetize "extremism" or "hate." What a dangerous slippery slope. Who gets to define what is extreme or hateful? Scary stuff
Noa Tishby did an excellent job here.
Noa Tisby is 🔥! Damn.❤❤❤❤
andrew young is highly intelligent
Yes to bad he was not on the panel instead of Yang. Even at 91 he would run circles around those two airheads on the panel last night.
As is Elissa...
So is Andrew Yang
No, anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism! Some members of a religion can decide they're entitled to a country of their own - others disagreeing with that notion has nothing to do with the religion itself.
So are you advocating for the destruction of the state of Israel ?
Jews are an ethnic group, it’s why Atheist Jews are not an oxymoron. And of course the worst genocide of Jews - and they’ve been through more than one - was racially, not religiously based. A baptized Weinstein did not escape the gas chambers.
Regardless, if this were 1917 or even 1947, I could concede the point. But after the right of the Jewish People to self-determination like other ethno-national groups have been recognized by the international community, and well established for close to a century, to declare that only they must today be removed of that right is antisemitic. Unless of course you are of the opinion that other countries like Turkey, Pakistan, etc. ought to also not exist. But if the one country to which you apply this moral logic happens to be the only one where Jews are a majority, it is fair to question if there is an ulterior motive.
Finally, I was searching for this comment. Quite disappointed I've been scrolling for like 5 minutes to get to it. I thought that was bs as well.
I think Andrew Yang and Bernie Sanders should form their own third party , with Yang being President and Sanders his Vice President, wouldn't that be something?
would have been something in 2020 and too late for 2024 but Bernie is stuck on his federal jobs guarantee and cant see past it, Yang will benefit most in the future from someone with very strong foreign policy experience
Free soup for everyone!
The ancient Hebrew word for "soul" literally is interchangeable with "breath", because life, according to the Bible, begins with the first breath of air.
Tems and anyone wearing view obstructing outfits must swap seats with someone in the back row.
tell that to the macho guys with large cowboy hats .. they are clueless
Seat them behind a pillar with instructed view.
Andrew Yang is brilliant
Abortion debate has to be a first sign of a society collapsing.
A brief reminder that South Africa, a country with the highest unemployment rate in the world currency (29.2%) still has billionaires.
So to comments of people I see laughing thinking that no way that the ultra wealthy would allow the US employment to tank because "there still needs to be people to buy things" forgets that we live in a global market and these billionaires don't care if the entire country is impoverished due to automation from AI or outsourcing. They'll always find another market somewhere else in the world. They will have us living as serfs cleaning their palaces, feeding us scraps before the end of the day.
Tax them at 70, 80%. If they offshore their money, tell any country that harbors their funds they will be sanctioned by the US government for harboring funds for financial criminals evading taxation.
Amen to this!
Fan of Yang, didn't care for Slotkin much. Watches the whole show and both dodged parts of the tougher questions but something about her I don't like. Can't quite tell what it is yet.
yang dodged questions because he wants to be productive, slotkin dodged questions because she doesn't want to face the uncomfortable truth that the democratic party side of society has series issues.
Same
As I understand that it’s a mischaracterization to say that people are “ staying home“ and not filling these jobs that businesses are offering. Instead, people aren’t taking jobs that are terrible, or don’t pay enough. Unemployment is at a national low to my understanding. So while it could end up being a natural result, that some of these jobs that people hate doing will be taken over by something like chat GPT, I’m disappointed to hear two American political figures rattling off that people aren’t working. That is not the case. what’s happening is that people don’t want to do work for too little money to make ends meet, or for companies that have no respect for them.
When I hear how companies treat people in a lot of these jobs that are minimum or close to minimum wage, it’s no wonder that they try to find any other solution to their employment problem.
amen
These people can understand that.
@@Kinikia95 I have no doubt that they have the ability to understand it, what’s more I’m pretty sure that they actually do. I realize that they are just speaking off the cuff here, but I found it telling that they were parodying the same things that very conservative people are saying.
And if they really do know this, then why are they saying that people aren’t willing to work. that’s a very different sentiment from saying people aren’t willing to do that work, or that companies aren’t paying enough to get them to do work that they don’t want to do. It’s an important distinction, and I expect more from folks who say that they are on the side of workers.
I'm definitely NOT anti Israel, but, I'm definitely not pro Israel, but not in any way for anti-Semitic reasons and I'll just leave at that. However, Noa Tshby is stunningly beautiful.
Andrew Yang
🤙🤙🤙
😂😂😂
❤️❤️❤️
Look who is singing a different tune now that she is running statewide
The answer to the Oscar question, who actually watches the Oscar/award shows.
to Congressman Slotkin
no one is automatically harmed by extreme content
so it shouldn't be illegal or illegal to make money from it
She's just another moronic Democrat dramatizing and making sh** up as usual.
Why Is Bill Promoting Elissa Slotkin? She is often on the show - just to promote her Senate run? Have NEVER heard her often a fresh perspective on anything.
I wish all Dems were as smart as Andrew Yang.
You mean the Major of New York.
Yeah because the woman sitting next to him might as well be infant in her stupidity she’s spewing
How about all people? Most cons i know just repeat what their brand of propaganda says like parrots.
Boyyy! Stop.
AOC is a genius. She figured out of to use a garbage disposal.
We should make the church pay taxes.
What church?
If I could click 100 thumbs up I would.. It's a money making business!!!
@@hew195050 How do you feel about non-profit organizations that bring in millions of dollars each year? Should they lose their status to or do you just hold that opinion against institutions you dislike?
@@timducote5713 I know t lie young Turks , planed parenthood , open society worldwide would disagree.
@@timducote5713 All of them
On the abortion issue: I'm boycotting Walgreen's. Boycotts work. I'll boycott any pharmacy that says they won't distribute legally-prescribed abortion pills. That's one thing we can all do on this issue right now.
Elissa Slotkin makes a lot of sense, I’m getting moderate Democrat vibes and I’m all for it.
Antizionism is not Anti-Semitism. The fact that this person just lays that out in such a matter of fact statement is amazing.
Denying the state of Israel and therefore it’s People the right to exist is nothing but antisemitic.
There's an assumption you're making that seems evidently false that Jewish people can't exist outside the state of Israel. I would like an explanation as to why anti-Zionism is antisemitic. It seems like a very arbitrary but convenient boundary that the commentator set. Or perhaps it reveals a weakness in the argument for the creation of the state of Israel: let's just call those that have a contrary idea prejudiced. With that said, I think it's a huge stretch to argue that today the state of Israel shouldn't exist.
@@cutinhas I am protestant from Germany with specific knowledge of european and german history and I know for a fact, although Jewish people can exist outside the state of Israel, they are sadly NEVER as safe and accepted as regular citizens as in Israel, due to permanent vulgar antisemitism and long time systemic anti-semitism. Recently the german institutions celebrated 1700 years of jewish life in the borders of todays Germany. And although they have contributed so much to the country and it's culture for centuries they have been purposely treated badly since then. And I mean besides the uncounted progroms and the years between 1933-1945: In medieaval times hey have been "under protection" of the King of the Holy Roman Empire as personal belongings (THINGS!!! not humans) in order to get squeezed out with extraordinary taxes. The complete city-wall of cologne was built with extra tax-payments only of the jewish population. Martin Luther wrote wide-spread rants against all jews after they refused to convert to Lutherism and wanted them to burn. Guilds, clubs, parties: "No jews allowed!". Kaiser Wilhelm ranted against jews: "I think the best would be gas." Walter Rathenau was one of the most important politicians of the Weimar Republic and killed by right-extremist antisemites. Please look up, what happened in Halle 2019. Theodor Herzl was right.
@@AugaAuf By that logic denying the State of Palestine to exists is also anti-Semitic. Seeing as Arabs are also Semitic, that's is if you actually use the definition of Semitic to the T.
I concur that it was bullcrap.
Thank you for being up the seriousness of the abortion issue in our country. Glad the Michigan representative told the story of her constituents saying “I’m pro-life but I don’t want to tell other women what to do”. I hear this so often. My issue and response is “but you ARE telling woman what to do with their bodies when you vote for pro-life candidates.”
Pick a legal side! Your religious opinion is irrelevant. We are talking about laws that control women’s bodies. You can’t play both sides. Grown a spine and fight for women’s rights to OWN their bodies.
I love Andrew yang, he's got my vote.
He's 100% right. He was a killer on the show Friday.
44% of Americans don't vote.
-46% of the people who don't vote because they don't like either candidate, don't feel represented, or feel like their vote won't make a difference.
- The female Democrat HAS to defend her party and the system bc if she didn't she would be shooting herself and her chances in the foot.
-Andrew Yang during the last election phase was the only candidate to speak out about important issues.
+UBI (universal base income)
+ Ai and how AI will effect the the job sector VERY shortly.
+ All the whole he never seemed off base, flighty, redirected,
+ He will never be a primary candidate because he actually makes sense, talks about important issues, and wants to get things done.
Andrew all the labor lost during covid is not at home. Some of it's in the grave and it's not coming back.
Yeah, a ton of 80 year olds were active in the work force.
@@mikestevenson576 you need better facts, mate
@@lorettanericcio-bohlman567 That was so convincing.
Great panel! Loved comments by Elissa Slotkin!
I found her to be absolutely horrible. I would never vote for a person like her.
Who gets to define what is extreme? lol.
I actually like the idea of second place being vice president
Yang silencing the idiots on the incoming doom of a.i
Actually he said it’s going to take people’s jobs..
"I think he (Trump) is going to arrive on all these (social media) platforms and we'll all be collectively dumber for it." Andrew Yang for the obvious score!
Andrew Yang is the perfect person to speak about dumbing down the electorate since he is an integral part of the process.
Important content❤
I wish we had heard of the twitter files committee, why was it not all over the news? could it be getting suppressed.
I remember how excited Yang was when Kamala was appointed VP. 🤮
Being anti-Israel in government, policy, or Netanyahu, is not being anti-Semite. Thank you, Rep. Elissa Slotkin, for saying that. I am anti-abortion but pro-choice. It's up to the pregnant female whether she wants to abort a pregnancy or not.
Funny that there's a supreme court case about social media content right before the next election cycle...
Not exactly sure of your point. The next election cycle is 2024 - you know these things are every 2 years, right? The case is being heard in the current SC term. And they decide what cases they hear. So, according to you, any case they hear would be "right before the next election cycle". How or when should they hear them to meet your standards of not being in an election cycle?
Math guy should Nominee for president candidate ❤
"Nobody starves in America. The problem is the opposite. There are places that they can always go to get food... and they don't starve." That's really ignorant, Bill. You have a big platform, and you should better educate yourself. #hungercliff
Anti-Zionism is NOT anti-Semitism. I am a pro-Semite with a great respect for the Jewish religion, people and history. I am also an anti-Zionist. I care about the treatment of the Palestinian people, and the state of Israel is both territorially aggressive and an apartheid government which denies equal rights to non-Jewish citizens.
You can be a zionist and still care about the treatment of Palestinians.
And non Jewish citizens have the exact same rights as Jewish citizens in Israel. In fact the previous government that unseated Netanyahu included an Arab/Palestinian, Islamic party.
Yoga Chick that is an unbelievably stupid comment . Ignorant too. Anti Zionism means you think we don't desrve a home, that we should continue to be attacked by others. Arabs living within the SOI have the same rights as Jews which sadly is not the same for Jews and other minorities that have the misfortune to live in Arab countries. Like the Copts in Egypt, Yazidis in Iran, Zoroastrians.
I wonder how the anti-Zionist test would hold up if applied analogously to the conflict in Kashmir. Which religion gets first dibs? Which religion gets higher status when the conflict is about territory? Does finders keepers really basically become the answer? Or can you interrupt that with a higher claim? I don't really know the answer.
Trump is yelling fire in a theater all the time . Information should be faced with consequences.
Life begins at first breath. What a scientific argument.
So the baby inside a woman’s womb isn’t a living thing?
It actually is. Until the first breath, the fetus is a parasite, requiring the host to breathe, eat and remove waste for it. The first breath is the beginning of being an actual unique being. I assume you never took university level biology.
Was this audience given whippets before taping? Between the shrill laughter and the stupid questions it’s clear they’re on something. Also, to the Israeli lady giving her opinion about how the US should run its elections: why not worry about your own country first?
So many good things about this show, but the overtimes are often unbalanced like this one. There one was a TV satirical skit in Germany called, Two Chairs (Guests), One Opinion. It made fun of TV discussions where the participants all held the same or similar beliefs, and no one offered counterarguments.
Reality is sobering. Get ready.
Reality is an illusion. Get praying.
Proud Michigander, proud of Slotkin for all that she said, proud of MI for passing Prop 3 last November to keep our reproductive rights, and proud to have worked on the campaign!
Call centres whose staff will answer your concerns about a product or service? Keep them and make more. I HATE automated help lines.
Call centres whose staff are paid to call you during dinner to sell you crypto or timeshares? I hope they all implode and the owners go to debtor's jail.
The 1st amendment applies to the government not private companies making rules.
No it applies to citizens regardless of venue or position. Any other interpretation is censorship. We have had too much censorship throughout history.
As long as the company stays private. The st Louis zoo is free. Used to just walk in but with covid you have to register online. So now citizens need a phone to go to the zoo their taxes pay for? If I need RUclips for example to access a presidential debate in the future what happens if I banned from their platform? I am banned from the Democratic process.
The 1st amendment says the government shall not write any law that abridges free speech. Any government banning books is a direct violation of the 1st amendment. Don't like you can't post hateful incorrect nonsense on RUclips then go to a platform that allows it.
@@JellyBean-lo4sl And who decides what is hateful?........or incorrect since it seems people think their opinions are truth nowadays........Nonsense can be a matter of interpretation depending on intention. Much of what is considered comedy can by others be considered nonsense. You really need to spend some time thinking about your willingness to shut others down based on your feelings. The core of the issue is that U-Tube, like many other platforms, is a venue for public discourse. As a private company they can certainly make policies on what is allowed. Those decisions need to be applied uniformly though and individuals with differences of opinion must be allowed their speech equally if it does not violate fairly applied policies. Anything else is a violation of rights under the constitution.
@@Zaekyr - sweetie, I'm not the one banning books because they hurt my racist, homophobic, xenophobic, scared of everyone who doesn't look like me feelings. Come out of the basement and stop smelling your own farts already.
Bill's comment about I just read the question just like talk to somebody home Depot I just work here I don't know anyting I'm not involved I just work here
doesn't stop him from butting in and making some lame comments ...