Absolutely ! Next question would be if this is some sort of a one-timer ... Well, in the airline indusry the multi-eye-principal has proven to be a center piece for safety. Hopefully there are no or a few underreportings ...
Interesting. This summary seems to show some lack of concern over the missing tool. This is why there are so many layers to procedures and checks (though in this case, they didn't seem to work). Some good lessons to be learned here. Edit: The link it the ATSB report is NOT in the video description, nor could I find it in the linked article on the website.
Even the best procedures and verifications only work when they are followed. Just like a cashier passing on a till, the location of every items should be accounted for during the handover.
Qantas or the company they got to do the aircraft maintenance (assuming different company). As the plane owner they take the word that the work was completed and all checks were signed off on.
Not really, all kinds of stuff happens with Boeing that doesn't even make mainstream news anymore...simply cause due to their own chaotic stories the standard for shocking headlines is so high now. This is a aviation focussed channel...ofcourse they reported on this. As did everyone else earlier this year
The fact that plane was put back into service with the tool still unaccounted for is insane
It is obvious there will be a lot of aircraft maintenance positions newly available at LAX.
No, it really isn't. Look up "just safety culture".
I ran a small automotive shop and the mechanics always checked their tool for missing tools before letting a car go...but an aricraft!!
In aviation, maintenance error have occurred in the past and i think this recent case is mind-blowing.
Absolutely ! Next question would be if this is some sort of a one-timer ... Well, in the airline indusry the multi-eye-principal has proven to be a center piece for safety. Hopefully there are no or a few underreportings ...
Interesting. This summary seems to show some lack of concern over the missing tool. This is why there are so many layers to procedures and checks (though in this case, they didn't seem to work). Some good lessons to be learned here.
Edit: The link it the ATSB report is NOT in the video description, nor could I find it in the linked article on the website.
www.atsb.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/AO-2024-006%20Final.pdf
Even the best procedures and verifications only work when they are followed.
Just like a cashier passing on a till, the location of every items should be accounted for during the handover.
That could have been bad.
Can't blame one person.. total breakdown of protocol on quanta's part.,
Qantas or the company they got to do the aircraft maintenance (assuming different company). As the plane owner they take the word that the work was completed and all checks were signed off on.
I'm not surprised I never heard about this
I’m actually impressed that A380 can fly with forgotten tools in their engines and no accident happened.
Honestly insane how i never heard of this, pretty scary story if you think about it
it is insane you have never heard of guru daily mail and their reluctance to report anything non boeing
@AbdullahNajib-b9z :/
Waiting for the video on the new Alaska Trans-Pacific flights to drop
Don't forget, the A380 also flew with a tool on the flight-deck!
If it was a boeing,coverage would be astronomical
The coverage was extensive when this happened.
Stop with the conspiracies…
Not really, all kinds of stuff happens with Boeing that doesn't even make mainstream news anymore...simply cause due to their own chaotic stories the standard for shocking headlines is so high now. This is a aviation focussed channel...ofcourse they reported on this. As did everyone else earlier this year
Someone is riding in his bathyscaphe again, at least flight level -1000.
😂
If it was a Boeing,it would have fallen from the sky like a mango
@@simondahl5437 what?there was no coverage at all from your hero daily mail!
No big deal tbh
Pretty LAME video...
😂😂