Great explanations. The secret here is "unless you have a cmm that will just figure it out for you". Now a days I feel like the cmm has to figure out the programmer. 😁
Great quote! I forgot I said that, wasn’t in my notes for sure. It’s probably a little glib, because it does take serious skill reason with a CMM machine as you mention. Thanks for watching and commenting.
Hello Dean, Thank you for the valuable video lesson. I just wanted a clarification on Profile Position Combines (8:47) topic. Here, for the slot, profile value is larger than the position tolerance (internal feature). For external feature (shaft) is it allowed to give higher value in position than the profile ? I wanted to control the size with the Profile value (0.25) and the boundary with the position at mmc (1.0m). Please advice. Thank you
This is all good info. Thanks for sharing. I do have a question. Do you have any videos explaining position / true position of a feature in relationship to a datum that have Profile callout attached to it. ** Example: on a Nose Tip Fairing type of part, Datum A (flat plane bottom of part) Profile .020 | Datum B (is flange that follows the contour of part 3D feature) no callout attached to it. | Datum C (flat inner wall that is perpendicular to datum A) no callout attached to it. and have a .58x 125 +/-.02 hole with a true position .030 to |A|B|C| with no MMC.** Lets say the holes are too high from datum a about .005 out of tolerance. Can the inspector bestfit the holes and datum a profile to bring them within tolerance ? - CMM / Portable CMM Tech here.
Hi Dean, If i was trying to control rectangular position of 4 slot widths as a pattern to no datums (just eachother), I could just type 4" x" by the FCF to make them a pattern, however if one of the slot widths was a different width, would it be acceptable to still just type "4x" since the FCF would be attached to a dimension line that didn't fit with the odd slot? or would I have to have 2 FCF - one "3x" and one dimensioned off the other slot width and somehow note a "sim req" to show they are a pattern?
Nice explanation, mr. Odell! Thank you very much
Thanks for the comment!
This is gold. Thanks for the explanation.
Great explanations. The secret here is "unless you have a cmm that will just figure it out for you". Now a days I feel like the cmm has to figure out the programmer. 😁
Great quote! I forgot I said that, wasn’t in my notes for sure. It’s probably a little glib, because it does take serious skill reason with a CMM machine as you mention.
Thanks for watching and commenting.
Thank you for what you do here. Btw. nice sound in background. ;) Greetings from Poland.
Thanks so much! Also, I’m glad someone likes the music.
As usual, I learned a lot along your sharing, thank you sir!
Great to hear! Thanks for letting me know.
Hello Dean, Thank you for the valuable video lesson.
I just wanted a clarification on Profile Position Combines (8:47) topic. Here, for the slot, profile value is larger than the position tolerance (internal feature).
For external feature (shaft) is it allowed to give higher value in position than the profile ?
I wanted to control the size with the Profile value (0.25) and the boundary with the position at mmc (1.0m). Please advice.
Thank you
This is all good info. Thanks for sharing. I do have a question. Do you have any videos explaining position / true position of a feature in relationship to a datum that have Profile callout attached to it. ** Example: on a Nose Tip Fairing type of part, Datum A (flat plane bottom of part) Profile .020 | Datum B (is flange that follows the contour of part 3D feature) no callout attached to it. | Datum C (flat inner wall that is perpendicular to datum A) no callout attached to it. and have a .58x 125 +/-.02 hole with a true position .030 to |A|B|C| with no MMC.** Lets say the holes are too high from datum a about .005 out of tolerance. Can the inspector bestfit the holes and datum a profile to bring them within tolerance ? - CMM / Portable CMM Tech here.
Hi Dean, If i was trying to control rectangular position of 4 slot widths as a pattern to no datums (just eachother), I could just type 4" x" by the FCF to make them a pattern, however if one of the slot widths was a different width, would it be acceptable to still just type "4x" since the FCF would be attached to a dimension line that didn't fit with the odd slot? or would I have to have 2 FCF - one "3x" and one dimensioned off the other slot width and somehow note a "sim req" to show they are a pattern?
Do you need to remove datum reference C from the .06 tolerance and remove datum reference B on the .02 tolerance on the first example?
Thank you!👍🏻
You are welcome! Thanks for watching.