Sinclair wafer scale effort in the 1980s was a technical success, but investors killed it when the prices for hard disks, with which it would compete, suddenly dropped after having been stable for a while.
something makes me happy about seeing cerebras go from this bat shit crazy idea to successful company cooperating with big players like HPE to bring their product into all kinds of institutions
more of this please.. in different forms.. i dont think ppl care about cpu's, as much lately... lets adapt with the times! And you bring something very unique to the table.
The comment about VLIW is interesting, can we get video on current market situation of differerent architectures, e.g. market situation of VLIW vs. super scalar processors?
Год назад+3
I so enjoy this coupling , i´m very happy for this and your channel.
@@TechTechPotato I should end my day at this point too. Excited to watch the next episodes as soon as they come out. Maybe there is some chips in there that make it to consumer products. the only option I found for running like a 16B language model locally is 80GB A100 PCIe card. and that price tag is a little out there for something that will essentially sit idle for 98% of the day.
Hey Ian your comment section is seriously broken (or you really did delete my comment this time). Now my previous comment has disappeared, and yours with it. I had just left a response to you apologising and pointing out some other issues. Also as well as those issus Look at this comment section? RUclips says there's two comments, there's only 5 visible, and their upvote ratios don't make sense for there only being five. Here was my reply: @UC1r0DG-KEPyqOeW6o79PByw (edit: bahah I didn't write that, I wrote @ your channel name and YT changed it to I presume account ID)Sorry about the accusation! It looks like the comment section of the previous video is broken. This comment section was being weird when I initially left the above comment. E.g. the comment number at the top was stuck on 0 (and that normally seems to update in real-time). Also I've had the disappearing comments thing happen to me before, just not in a few years - sorry for jumping to conclusions. I think maybe the spam filter was broken on your previous video. Because you should know you have a huge crypto/investment comment chain still up on that video? Go to the comments and look for the comment by "Martinez Byttt" with +10 upvotes and 14 replies. All the replies are telling your users to go to this investor, it's disgusting. I'd suggest you go delete it, not that I think anyone in your audience is likely to fall for it. And yeah I know people can Google it. It's just it feels disrespectful to me when the main host (fairly) pushes their merch store, their Patreon, etc etc. And the co-host who is in every episode doesn't get a mention. I wouldn't expect them to get their Patreon or anything just social media links, where they work, and that they're the co-host. Maybe I'm overreacting. It's just if I were the main co-host with someone I would not be happy if I weren't mentioned in the description. Well I wouldn't really care. But if I were someone whose livelihood revolves around making content online and increasing the visibility of that content, then I would be. I actually think it's less about people being able to easily Google them - and more about just respect. Similar to how someone who stars in a film should have their name in the credits. Or someone who contributed to a scientific paper should have their name among the first few authors. I think that's what bugs me. And I checked and other podcasters and collab videos I watch from other people - virtually all of them mention in detail the hosts or who they did a collab with.
lol I couldn't leave this alone wondering if I was being unreasonable. So I went to have a look at other channels and here's some examples. E.g. Adam Savage's Tested mentions all the hosts, it doesn't link to each host - but then I think that's fair as it doesn't link to any of their profiles not even Adam's, it only links to the Tested channel and social media's, which are heavily decoupled from a single person, whereas this channel is essentially you. Behind the Bastards does the same as Tested, except this time they put the cohosts and co-hosts names in hashtags. The WAN show doesn't - but those are employees who come on. If Sally were your employee I not only wouldn't be bothered, I actually wouldn't expect you to put here in the description. When LTT does a video with someone else they're always featured heavily in the description. If there was a WAN show with a non-employee (excluding Luke) as the co-host, I suspect LTT would add them, although maybe not with how disorganised the WAN show already is lol. Many podcasts like the Ezra Klein Show go above and beyond and add in people who aren't on-screen. Funhaus podcast links to the Twitter of all hosts/cohosts/guests. TheThoughtEmporium's pseudo-podcasts link to guests socials. Just a random sample I could think up off the top of my head, and yeah it convinces me I'm not being unreasonable that it bothered me she is not listed in the descriptions. I think the same should also apply to colabs you do, e.g. if Patrik from STH is in a 10 min ideo and you two talk for 5 mins in it - you should also include a link to him and the STH channel in the description - that's how most other channels function and it's what's fair. Hope this has come across as me trying to help. I love your channel because your videos contain a lot of technical information that the larger channels gloss over, and you also have a really unique sense of humour and personality that comes out great in videos (partly why I am not as much of a fan as the heavily scripted show part of this, although this weeks seemed better (I'm guessing just because you felt more relaxed and into it - I'm guessing not feedback as they seem all prerecorded of course).
When I see the AI show pop up in my feed I get excited that soon we will have a after show. Love the content.
Sinclair wafer scale effort in the 1980s was a technical success, but investors killed it when the prices for hard disks, with which it would compete, suddenly dropped after having been stable for a while.
I always at least realized that those cerebrus chips/wafers were nuts but now you really got me thinking about it. What an accomplishment!
something makes me happy about seeing cerebras go from this bat shit crazy idea to successful company cooperating with big players like HPE to bring their product into all kinds of institutions
more of this please.. in different forms.. i dont think ppl care about cpu's, as much lately... lets adapt with the times! And you bring something very unique to the table.
XMOS is an evolution of the Inmos Transputer, so if you are familiar with that it helps to understand the XMOS ideas a little better.
eye contact and smiles. I love it
I'd really like to learn more about the system cerebrus is using to power, cool, and connect their waferscale engine. That's right up my alley.
@@SallyWF thanks!
90 days is still WAY faster than ordering a new mainframe from IBM :)
Enjoying this a lot
Hi back atcha, Sally and Ian!
I'm expecting Cerebras CS-3D will be a 3D Wafer of molten silicone core and will double as a thermal storage unit.
Love these, keep it up!
Thanks for the video!
waiting for more talk episodes 🍿🍿🍿
looking forward for more!
The comment about VLIW is interesting, can we get video on current market situation of differerent architectures, e.g. market situation of VLIW vs. super scalar processors?
I so enjoy this coupling , i´m very happy for this and your channel.
push push push engagement engagement engagement!!
been binge watching them all day, but there is no 4th episode and this one is two weeks old. So hasn't been "next monday".
Check my twitter, I've been on the road the last couple of weeks and other items have got in the way.
@@TechTechPotato I should end my day at this point too.
Excited to watch the next episodes as soon as they come out. Maybe there is some chips in there that make it to consumer products. the only option I found for running like a 16B language model locally is 80GB A100 PCIe card. and that price tag is a little out there for something that will essentially sit idle for 98% of the day.
Why have you been marinating this for half a year+?
This episode of the podcast after show is only 2 minutes on Google Podcasts.
Oh weird, let me change that
Please give us cheap 24-32GB consumer accelerators!
Hope you make other content in additon to IBM sponsered content
TechTechPotato over Ethernet 😆😆😆
tenstorrent and Jim Keller
Hey Ian your comment section is seriously broken (or you really did delete my comment this time). Now my previous comment has disappeared, and yours with it. I had just left a response to you apologising and pointing out some other issues. Also as well as those issus Look at this comment section? RUclips says there's two comments, there's only 5 visible, and their upvote ratios don't make sense for there only being five. Here was my reply:
@UC1r0DG-KEPyqOeW6o79PByw (edit: bahah I didn't write that, I wrote @ your channel name and YT changed it to I presume account ID)Sorry about the accusation! It looks like the comment section of the previous video is broken.
This comment section was being weird when I initially left the above comment. E.g. the comment number at the top was stuck on 0 (and that normally seems to update in real-time). Also I've had the disappearing comments thing happen to me before, just not in a few years - sorry for jumping to conclusions.
I think maybe the spam filter was broken on your previous video. Because you should know you have a huge crypto/investment comment chain still up on that video? Go to the comments and look for the comment by "Martinez Byttt" with +10 upvotes and 14 replies. All the replies are telling your users to go to this investor, it's disgusting. I'd suggest you go delete it, not that I think anyone in your audience is likely to fall for it.
And yeah I know people can Google it. It's just it feels disrespectful to me when the main host (fairly) pushes their merch store, their Patreon, etc etc. And the co-host who is in every episode doesn't get a mention. I wouldn't expect them to get their Patreon or anything just social media links, where they work, and that they're the co-host.
Maybe I'm overreacting. It's just if I were the main co-host with someone I would not be happy if I weren't mentioned in the description. Well I wouldn't really care. But if I were someone whose livelihood revolves around making content online and increasing the visibility of that content, then I would be.
I actually think it's less about people being able to easily Google them - and more about just respect. Similar to how someone who stars in a film should have their name in the credits. Or someone who contributed to a scientific paper should have their name among the first few authors. I think that's what bugs me.
And I checked and other podcasters and collab videos I watch from other people - virtually all of them mention in detail the hosts or who they did a collab with.
lol I couldn't leave this alone wondering if I was being unreasonable. So I went to have a look at other channels and here's some examples. E.g. Adam Savage's Tested mentions all the hosts, it doesn't link to each host - but then I think that's fair as it doesn't link to any of their profiles not even Adam's, it only links to the Tested channel and social media's, which are heavily decoupled from a single person, whereas this channel is essentially you.
Behind the Bastards does the same as Tested, except this time they put the cohosts and co-hosts names in hashtags.
The WAN show doesn't - but those are employees who come on. If Sally were your employee I not only wouldn't be bothered, I actually wouldn't expect you to put here in the description. When LTT does a video with someone else they're always featured heavily in the description. If there was a WAN show with a non-employee (excluding Luke) as the co-host, I suspect LTT would add them, although maybe not with how disorganised the WAN show already is lol.
Many podcasts like the Ezra Klein Show go above and beyond and add in people who aren't on-screen.
Funhaus podcast links to the Twitter of all hosts/cohosts/guests.
TheThoughtEmporium's pseudo-podcasts link to guests socials.
Just a random sample I could think up off the top of my head, and yeah it convinces me I'm not being unreasonable that it bothered me she is not listed in the descriptions. I think the same should also apply to colabs you do, e.g. if Patrik from STH is in a 10 min ideo and you two talk for 5 mins in it - you should also include a link to him and the STH channel in the description - that's how most other channels function and it's what's fair.
Hope this has come across as me trying to help. I love your channel because your videos contain a lot of technical information that the larger channels gloss over, and you also have a really unique sense of humour and personality that comes out great in videos (partly why I am not as much of a fan as the heavily scripted show part of this, although this weeks seemed better (I'm guessing just because you felt more relaxed and into it - I'm guessing not feedback as they seem all prerecorded of course).
First 😊