Kinda surprised that you didn't discuss Denver. In addition to being a cold winter city with a no-roof, very traditional stadium that people like, we also have the misfortune of being a mile above sea level, meaning it'll be nosebleeds galore for anyone from sea level coming here for the game.
Really the title should be renamed to. Cities that are very cold in February with horrible winter weather must know that there is no way that you’ll get a Super Bowl
@@mawile2468 the Vikings could still get another one after they built a new shiny dome, which they did host the one the year it opened. U.S. Bank Stadium is nice
Actually, at one point Kansas City was voting whether to put up a moving roof over Arrowhead and Kauffman. But voters said no. I think we would have gotten a Super Bowl by now had we gotten the roof. And the design plan for it look very cool. You could host a Super Bowl and no longer have postponed baseball games due to rain.
The dome idea was considered twice (once in 1985 and again when the Arrowhead renovation was put on the local ballots) but failed to get much traction either time. Honestly, I think it's for the best the dome never came to be. It wouldn't be Arrowhead with one.
As a kansas citian, it would have looked cool but it would've changed the feel of arrowhead. The main reason it didn't get traction is the kansas city taxpayers would have been responsible for more than half of the cost.
With the season lengthening, bye weeks, and expanded playoffs, Super Bowl in April may happen in our lifetimes, reopening a lot of possibilities. Remember when it was a January thing?
I remember early January Superbowl s. The Conference Championships were held the weekend between Christmas and New years .The Superbowl was in early to mid January and it was also an afternoon game. Superbowl 11 was played on January 9,1977 and the kickoff was 12:30 pm Pacific time. 3:30 pm Eastern.
You're in a warm weather winter state of course they will. It's more about the weather and willingness to fork out money. Plus Jacksonville has alot of clubs lol
I’m a Bills fan who has long accepted the fact that the super bowl is never coming to Buffalo. It’s literally the worst possible option: awful weather, tiny market, old stadium and one other thing you didn’t mention is that the NFL doesn’t want cities that would attend the game themselves. If ever they played the super bowl in Green Bay or Chicago or Buffalo or New England or Pittsburgh or Kansas City or Philadelphia and that team qualified, it would essentially be a home game for that team. The NFL is being proven right because the Buccaneers barely felt like a home game in part due to the pandemic and I bet the Rams will not feel like much of a home game either.
It’s very unlikely that Green Bay will ever host a Super Bowl. But I do think there is a very small chance they will because of how historic the team and the stadium are
The Bills really need a new stadium. As a Dolphins fan, I don’t wanna loose the Bills to San Antonio. I really don’t hope the Bills end up leaving. The team is to good to leave.
I wish Cleveland would build a retractible roof stadium. It's an amazing city. People are always surprised at how much they love the city when they visit. Plus it would be nice to have people in the front office build a team that doesn't focus so much on the run. The winter weather is why the Browns have been built as a running team lately.
The game is meant to play in the elements. The NFL Championship before 1967 was always played in the stadium of the team with the better record. The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Chicago Cardinals 7-0 in a blizzard in 1948. In Philadelphia.
Only time we will see cold weather SB's besides New York will be Detroit, Indy, or Minneapolis, as they have bustling cities and of course domed stadiums.
As a arizonan that lives 10min away from state farm stadium the super bowl has always been fun here mainly with the new resort they are opening next year
NY ( or actually North Jersey) broke the mold & got a Super Bowl in a cold weather city without a domed stadium......only because the NFL was trying to reach out to an area struggling to recover after 9/11. The weather for that made the NFL nervous to the point that they haven't really mentioned going that route again.
It was 13 -14 years after 9/11, they had a brand new stadium very nice expensive which is hone to 2 teams as he said they offered it to all owners who would build a new stadium
If the NFL doesn't want a team to have a home field advantage in the super bowl. Then they should host it in Lincoln Memorial Stadium in Lincoln Nebraska because there wouldn't be any home field advantage.
The NFL really could take a re-look at Cincinnati. Sadly our winters are fairly mild and there isn’t a guarantee of warm weather. If the NFL was to keep track of what the Farmers Almanac said, they could very well see Cincinnati as a good spot
Pretty much it comes to these factors who gets a superbowl. Outdoor stadium must be in warm climate, cold climate must have dome. Be near the city. Have a newer(ish) stadium.
At one time, superbowl games were held exclusivily in southern states including, Texas, California, and Arizona, and that was due to retractable roof and domed stadiums not being invented yet.
I am a life-long Philadelphia Eagles fan. When the new stadium was built( almost 20 years ago) there was talk of a dome for Super Bowl consideration . Philly had everything else the NFL wanted. Butter dome would be very $, &;since it was considered an advantage to be a team that was cold weather tough, ....... the idea was dropped.
I really feel like Charlotte and Bank of America Stadium could host a Super Bowl. The stadium is cared about and seems to get updates every two ish maybe three years. That could become even more frequent with the new MLS team Charlotte FC. Plus the Charlotte market is very rapidly growing along with the city of Rock Hill just down I-77. Plus the Panthers are building an all new practice and many other facilities there in Rock Hill. So the market is certainly there, TV and otherwise. The weather there in Charlotte is also pretty decent 9 times out of 10 so more than likely wouldn’t be too bad on the weather factor. Plus as a Panthers this would make me so happy and proud! #KEEP POUNDING!
The league needs 1 massive super stadium to host every super bowl a stadium that isn’t a home to any team but more like a home for all sports but can also have a nfl game every Sunday but any matchup from any nfl teams. Location should be canton Ohio a stadium named HOF Super stadium a massive indoor stadium.
Seattle will NEVER see a Super Bowl with their open air stadium. Too much rain and a slight chance of snow. Geographically, it's the most distant NFL city from another market. The stadium is only 20 years old and there is zero talk of a new dome stadium.
seattle is likely to never host the super bowl. They have a massive homelessness crisis going on, i mean i visited there a few times and outside of the stadium are all these homeless camps. even if you clean those up they're still all over the place. so from a business standpoint, its likely not to generate that much money.
They had the Kingdome for 25 years and never hosted it. They had an NCAA final 4 there in 1995 but no Super Bowl. As a kid growing up the the 90s I always thought why didn’t they get a Super Bowi?
Actually, the Power & LIght district in KC would be a great place to have Super Bowl week. I lived there for a year and loved it. Winter time did suck though, lol!
Here in Missouri, we joke any winter day can be a snowy hell or feel like spring day... getting a Super Bowl in KC isn't going to happen unfortunately due to the luck factor of weather events
See to me, I think we should stop playing the Super Bowl in warm weather. I think we should play the super bowl in the rain and snow and Cold. It would make it more fun. Football is an outdoor sport. I would love to see the Super Bowl in Green Bay, Chicago, Buffalo, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh.
I'm surprised how Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington and Boston have never hosted a Super Bowl, despite them being 4 of the top 10 media markets in the US. Each of those 4 cities really need to host a Super Bowl.
KC was actually awarded Super Bowl XLIX, of we renovated arrowhead to a climate controlled stadium. But we failed to pass the bond issue for a rolling roof, that would move between Arrowhead and Kauffman. So KC obviously withdrew its bid to host.
I’m from Rhode Island and gets really cold here February I can promise you that and not only that football is one of our favorite sports next to basketball down here the Dunkin Donut center gets loud when it comes to basketball games held in there
I was born and raised in Pittsburgh. This city probably falls short of the on the infrastructure part too, at least as far as the handling 100,000 additional people part. Especially in the winter, if it snows.
@@dcasper8514 that too, I agree. If you included the airport and surrounding areas, maybe. That's where you'd definitely run into the poor road system.
Boston does not have the infrastructure for an influx of tourists that large. lodging yes, but i don’t want to imagine how much worse that would make traffic
Unfortunately I agree with Buffalo. I have been there, and it is my favorite place to go. The fans are amazing. The stadium feel like its away from the rest of the craziness. While the stadium itself isn't the best, there really are no bad seats there. Just a lot of fun. Been to Pitt, Cle, Philly, and Chi too. Buffalo is by far my favorite.
Pittsburgh is another city that will never host the Superbowl. It is a big market but the stadium only holds roughly 64,000. Also the infrastructure or lack there of not many ways in or out of the city and stadium. Also weather sucks in February
You can have a super bowl in a cold weather state only if they play in a dome just like they did when the super bowl was play in Minnesota and Detroit one time. Plus also if you realize they always have the super bowl in warm weather states and cites that are big market cuz it brings more business and gives people something to do and bring the city money etc.
Detroit has actually hosted twice and so had Minneapolis. Detroit played the 1982,Super Bowl at the Silverdome & 2006 at Ford Field. Minneapolis hosted in 1992 at their old dome and in 2018. Hell it gets cold in Indianapolis & they hosted in 2012. I think all 3 could host again.
Chicago bears has bought land just outside of chicago where the old Arlington park race track was and will build a dome and then will get a super bowl probably multiple ones as the city has a lot to offer to traveling fans
I always say why not just use the stadium in St. Louis that the Rams played in as a spot to host the Superbowl, it's just sitting there and could be renovated easily
If the Edward Jones Dome hosted the Superbowl it would have made the substandard tier on the video called every stadium that hosted the Superbowl. If Candlestick Park managed to host Superbowl 37 instead of Qualcomm Stadium. It would have made the How On Earth Did They Host tier. The stadium category tier list. If the Astrodome hosted the Superbowl it too along with the Edward Jones Dome would have made the Substandard tier. 1. Top Level 2. Above Average 3. Good For it's Era 4. Average 5. Substandard 6. How on earth did they host? Once Superbowls 56 and 58 both happen. SoFi Stadium and Allegiance Stadium will both be in the Top Level Category.
Denver is kind of the obvious one left out of this video. Our winter climate is milder than most people think, we have the infrastructure to support a large influx of visitors on Super Bowl week. However, the climate and an open air stadium isn’t enough to convince the NFL to host a Super Bowl here. On top of that, Denver isn’t going to build a domed stadium anytime soon. Our stadium, whatever it’s name happens to be this week, is only about 20 years old.
TPS can you answer my question please, Is that a probability that the Super Bowl can come to Baltimore in the M&T BANK STADIUM of the Baltimore Ravens?
I just never understand why all the NFL teams have a Football Dome that way no games can be delayed do to Heavy Snow or Thunderstorms I get maybe it’s a culture thing for most franchises but look at the NBA they don’t do outdoors every NBA team has an Arena for their fans to be all warmed up I think the NFL should step in and Force all NFL Teams to have a Dome so that Every NFL Teams can a least host a Super Bowl
I wonder if NFL raised the stakes for NFL Pro Bowl the Winner of NFL Pro Bowl game NFC or AFC including hosting a Super Bowl for AFC championship or NFC championship a home game and new rule change that Super Bowl Champions received the 1 draft pick and 32 the draft pick order the NFL runner up received 2 the draft pick order and 31 the draft pick order and all the NFL Playoffs team's would get higher draft picks number then the NFL teams with worst record would have lower draft picks number another rule change the NFL have no preseason games NFL the Hall Of Fame game starts 20 game regular the NFL including no more NFL ties there must be a winner would be adding college football Sutton death rule if both teams received ball on 25 yard line and both teams score a touchdown and extra point or 2 point conversion the next over time their no time limit their be a winner , another rule change their be three bye weeks in case NFL was infected from COVID 19
I'm surprised Baltimore wasn't listed with it's fellow AFC North cites there's no way in heck Baltimore would host before Chicago and Philadelphia and even those are impossible
@@nexuseagles6279 because good ol' Danny boy never really invested in FedEx field despite steadily increasing the prices on quite literally everything.
@@nexuseagles6279 In Chicago, KC, and GB the stadiums are a part of the city's history and identity. They are cared for and maintained. Renovations when needed are easy to finance. FedEx was never that good of a stadium and it struggles to get the sorely needed renovations as no one likes the stadium and would rather have a new one built, but the owner won't do it
@@yujirohanma5199 Well I can't name anything Dan has done right especially with the lastest stunt. The Washington commanders....commies. I honestly feel horrible for Washington due to synder and am an Eagles fan.
@@themandalorian400 My QB and some of our fans nearly got hurt because of a falling rail this year at FedEx. I get it but it only 25 years olds and it's a Lawsuit waiting to happen with the safely and heath concerns. I understand some owners are awful and have no clue how to run a team but they at least keep their stadiums serviceable. Synder like every thing else he's given manages to screw that up.
![State of Play | September 24, 2024 [ENGLISH]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fVs0suPHAX8/mqdefault.jpg)
Kinda surprised that you didn't discuss Denver. In addition to being a cold winter city with a no-roof, very traditional stadium that people like, we also have the misfortune of being a mile above sea level, meaning it'll be nosebleeds galore for anyone from sea level coming here for the game.
right
My thoughts exactly
I wouldn’t last in Denver. It would be my worse nightmare. But to the brave souls that call the city home best of luck.
Also, mile high stadium doesn't have as many seats as many other stadiums.
@@Cottonmouth-tn1mi Actually it has more than most. I believe it’s top 7 in the NFL. Around 77,000.
Really the title should be renamed to. Cities that are very cold in February with horrible winter weather must know that there is no way that you’ll get a Super Bowl
Yeah basically if the stadium is not indoors or does not have nice weather it is never getting a Super Bowl
@@oscarlemus8153 Aka Whoever isn't the Saints, Raiders, 49ers, Cardinals, Chargers, Rams, Cowboys, Texans, Dolphins, Falcons, and Buccaneers
So true tho
@@mawile2468 the Vikings could still get another one after they built a new shiny dome, which they did host the one the year it opened. U.S. Bank Stadium is nice
Funny, New York City rings all those bells but they hosted the super bowl
Actually, at one point Kansas City was voting whether to put up a moving roof over Arrowhead and Kauffman. But voters said no. I think we would have gotten a Super Bowl by now had we gotten the roof. And the design plan for it look very cool. You could host a Super Bowl and no longer have postponed baseball games due to rain.
The dome idea was considered twice (once in 1985 and again when the Arrowhead renovation was put on the local ballots) but failed to get much traction either time. Honestly, I think it's for the best the dome never came to be. It wouldn't be Arrowhead with one.
So true
As a kansas citian, it would have looked cool but it would've changed the feel of arrowhead. The main reason it didn't get traction is the kansas city taxpayers would have been responsible for more than half of the cost.
The NFL had actually already given us the Super Bowl. But once the roof proposal failed, they moved the game.
You don’t needa done SuperBowl 48 was in MetLife remember
With the season lengthening, bye weeks, and expanded playoffs, Super Bowl in April may happen in our lifetimes, reopening a lot of possibilities. Remember when it was a January thing?
The ravens won there first superbowl on my first birthday party which funny enough was in January
I remember early January Superbowl s. The Conference Championships were held the weekend between Christmas and New years .The Superbowl was in early to mid January and it was also an afternoon game. Superbowl 11 was played on January 9,1977 and the kickoff was 12:30 pm Pacific time. 3:30 pm Eastern.
I live in Jacksonville and I can’t believe we’ve hosted a Super Bowl
You're in a warm weather winter state of course they will. It's more about the weather and willingness to fork out money. Plus Jacksonville has alot of clubs lol
I’m a Bills fan who has long accepted the fact that the super bowl is never coming to Buffalo. It’s literally the worst possible option: awful weather, tiny market, old stadium and one other thing you didn’t mention is that the NFL doesn’t want cities that would attend the game themselves. If ever they played the super bowl in Green Bay or Chicago or Buffalo or New England or Pittsburgh or Kansas City or Philadelphia and that team qualified, it would essentially be a home game for that team. The NFL is being proven right because the Buccaneers barely felt like a home game in part due to the pandemic and I bet the Rams will not feel like much of a home game either.
Baltimore qualifies as a city that will never host as well
No one wants to get robbed or shot😭. I hate to say that about us but its true, but I wouldn’t mind it
Yet Detroit had no problem hosting an SB.
It’s very unlikely that Green Bay will ever host a Super Bowl. But I do think there is a very small chance they will because of how historic the team and the stadium are
Seattle would probably not be a good choice, nor would Denver.
The Bills really need a new stadium. As a Dolphins fan, I don’t wanna loose the Bills to San Antonio. I really don’t hope the Bills end up leaving. The team is to good to leave.
Don’t worry they’re not going anywhere
If they do move, Jan 6 will look like a picnic
They aren't going anywhere lmfao 😂
@@Dmoney2690 More then likely no, but with their owners and just getting absolutely screwed out of a new stadium year after year concerns me.
@@thylacine519 agreed - Buffalo would burn to the ground if the Bills were moved
I wish Cleveland would build a retractible roof stadium. It's an amazing city. People are always surprised at how much they love the city when they visit. Plus it would be nice to have people in the front office build a team that doesn't focus so much on the run. The winter weather is why the Browns have been built as a running team lately.
Ohio starium
Funny cuz some of the NFL's most iconic games were in outdoor bad weather cities.
The game is meant to play in the elements. The NFL Championship before 1967 was always played in the stadium of the team with the better record. The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Chicago Cardinals 7-0 in a blizzard in 1948. In Philadelphia.
I still say that every NFL city regardless of weather should host the Superbowl
Only time we will see cold weather SB's besides New York will be Detroit, Indy, or Minneapolis, as they have bustling cities and of course domed stadiums.
As a arizonan that lives 10min away from state farm stadium the super bowl has always been fun here mainly with the new resort they are opening next year
NY ( or actually North Jersey) broke the mold & got a Super Bowl in a cold weather city without a domed stadium......only because the NFL was trying to reach out to an area struggling to recover after 9/11. The weather for that made the NFL nervous to the point that they haven't really mentioned going that route again.
It was 13 -14 years after 9/11, they had a brand new stadium very nice expensive which is hone to 2 teams as he said they offered it to all owners who would build a new stadium
Awesome video!
Can you do a top 10 cities that could have an nfl team?
If DC and Chicago get Domed or Retractable Roof Stadiums I think they would have a Chance
Chicago Bears just bought land NW of the city to do just that.
I don't think Seattle will ever get it either....outside stadium and dreary weather....
Or Charlotte.
If the NFL doesn't want a team to have a home field advantage in the super bowl.
Then they should host it in Lincoln Memorial Stadium in Lincoln Nebraska because there wouldn't be any home field advantage.
Nashville is not the warmest place to host the Super Bowl but you saw how fans turned out for the draft a few years ago. It would def be a party!
The NFL really could take a re-look at Cincinnati. Sadly our winters are fairly mild and there isn’t a guarantee of warm weather. If the NFL was to keep track of what the Farmers Almanac said, they could very well see Cincinnati as a good spot
there's nothing to do in ohio 💀
Pretty much it comes to these factors who gets a superbowl. Outdoor stadium must be in warm climate, cold climate must have dome. Be near the city. Have a newer(ish) stadium.
At one time, superbowl games were held exclusivily in southern states including, Texas, California, and Arizona, and that was due to retractable roof and domed stadiums not being invented yet.
Also Florida.
Louisiana
I am a life-long Philadelphia Eagles fan. When the new stadium was built( almost 20 years ago) there was talk of a dome for Super Bowl consideration . Philly had everything else the NFL wanted.
Butter dome would be very $, &;since it was considered an advantage to be a team that was cold weather tough, ....... the idea was dropped.
And the Fans act like retards, Hell No Philly will never get a Super Bowl
I really feel like Charlotte and Bank of America Stadium could host a Super Bowl. The stadium is cared about and seems to get updates every two ish maybe three years. That could become even more frequent with the new MLS team Charlotte FC. Plus the Charlotte market is very rapidly growing along with the city of Rock Hill just down I-77. Plus the Panthers are building an all new practice and many other facilities there in Rock Hill. So the market is certainly there, TV and otherwise. The weather there in Charlotte is also pretty decent 9 times out of 10 so more than likely wouldn’t be too bad on the weather factor. Plus as a Panthers this would make me so happy and proud! #KEEP POUNDING!
The BoA stadium is too small. It resembles a middle range college field.
Who’s up for a Top 10 Expansion Teams list that deserved to exist
Me
Why not
How about top 10 teams that should not be in the NFL
San Antonio
ruclips.net/video/Od-3oxpFWB0/видео.html
Paul Brown stadium's gonna need some huge renovations
The league needs 1 massive super stadium to host every super bowl a stadium that isn’t a home to any team but more like a home for all sports but can also have a nfl game every Sunday but any matchup from any nfl teams. Location should be canton Ohio a stadium named HOF Super stadium a massive indoor stadium.
Seattle will NEVER see a Super Bowl with their open air stadium. Too much rain and a slight chance of snow. Geographically, it's the most distant NFL city from another market. The stadium is only 20 years old and there is zero talk of a new dome stadium.
So basically, northern cities with outdoor stadiums. Did you really need to spend 12 minutes to say that?
I know it doesn’t take that much nonsense to get a point across
yeah i live near buffalo i have been in orchard park once it was the coldest place ive ever been in
Seattle should have been on this list
seattle is likely to never host the super bowl. They have a massive homelessness crisis going on, i mean i visited there a few times and outside of the stadium are all these homeless camps. even if you clean those up they're still all over the place. so from a business standpoint, its likely not to generate that much money.
@@loremaster77 I fucking live in Washington you don’t need to tell me this I know how big of a shit hole Seattle is
They had the Kingdome for 25 years and never hosted it. They had an NCAA final 4 there in 1995 but no Super Bowl. As a kid growing up the the 90s I always thought why didn’t they get a Super Bowi?
Recently moved to Green Bay and it gets really cold I’m from texas and I’m not used to the cold
Actually, the Power & LIght district in KC would be a great place to have Super Bowl week. I lived there for a year and loved it. Winter time did suck though, lol!
Here in Missouri, we joke any winter day can be a snowy hell or feel like spring day... getting a Super Bowl in KC isn't going to happen unfortunately due to the luck factor of weather events
Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, NC (home to my Carolina Panthers) should host the Super Bowl
I think that is the one remaining city that has never hosted one that could. Maybe Nashville as well.
@@dvferyance How ironic, my two favorite NFL teams/favorite cities I've been visited have never hosted the Super Bowl lol
It would genuinely be entertaining to watch a Super Bowl that has cold weather with possible snow
Love your video man
See to me, I think we should stop playing the Super Bowl in warm weather. I think we should play the super bowl in the rain and snow and Cold. It would make it more fun. Football is an outdoor sport. I would love to see the Super Bowl in Green Bay, Chicago, Buffalo, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh.
Nothing like to White Christmas
Baltimore, Charlotte (Carolina), Denver, Seattle, Nashville (Tennessee)
can do more content for the other 3 amercian sports and not just nfl
Wait there are other sports
this video was posted on my birthday
Did you guys forget Minnesota hosted the Super bowl in 1992? Yes it was domed stadium but it snowed
Yeah they didn’t mention that Detroit hosted twice or that Indy has hosted it too!
That’s just another thing to hate about the NFL. EVERY NFL city should be given the opportunity to host a Super Bowl!
Some team stadiums just aren’t big enough
@@honcho2469. That’s due only to NFL dictates. Those dictates ensure more bucks to the NFL and the grossly overpaid Commissioner and minions.
I'm surprised how Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington and Boston have never hosted a Super Bowl, despite them being 4 of the top 10 media markets in the US. Each of those 4 cities really need to host a Super Bowl.
Denver, St Louis, Caroline, n and South
Charlotte North Carolina won't host a SuperBowl either. They don't have enough hotels to host the SuperBowl
KC was actually awarded Super Bowl XLIX, of we renovated arrowhead to a climate controlled stadium. But we failed to pass the bond issue for a rolling roof, that would move between Arrowhead and Kauffman. So KC obviously withdrew its bid to host.
How different would the Super Bowl be if it was just a championship game played at either team's home stadium, without all the hype, shows and events?
If the NFL decided to hold a super bowl at FedEx field Roger Goodell wouldn't be breathing
I’m from Rhode Island and gets really cold here February I can promise you that and not only that football is one of our favorite sports next to basketball down here the Dunkin Donut center gets loud when it comes to basketball games held in there
A Superbowl at Lambeau Field would be epic in every way possible
Cleveland super bowl would be lit if it wasn’t so cold
10° rn where i live would be heaven we’ve hit -50 3 times in 2022
Another great video as always TPS
I was born and raised in Pittsburgh. This city probably falls short of the on the infrastructure part too, at least as far as the handling 100,000 additional people part. Especially in the winter, if it snows.
Nick Gangone...Pittsburgh has insufficient accommodations. Not enough hotels.
@@dcasper8514 that too, I agree. If you included the airport and surrounding areas, maybe. That's where you'd definitely run into the poor road system.
You didn't list Seattle and Denver. Due to cold weather and lack of a domed stadium, you can rule them out as well.
Lol I already know Bufallo will be on this list
Unless the new stadium is indoor, it’ll never happen
Nice
Correct
And Green Bay.
One important factor you failed to mention is the NFL has a hotel capacity requirement for a hosting city.
Too cold
Denver truly needs to host a Super Bowl! It’s an almost perfect location for such.
no its too cold
@@ShawnGassinNiggzIf Metlife can host a superbowl, so can Denver.
Missed out on Denver and seattle
Am I the only one that feels like a Super Bowl in the snow would actually be dope?
With all do respect NO!
No
Need a dome or rectacle roof Stadium to host. New York just got lucky didn't snow when hosting
Charlotte, home of the Panthers will never get a Super Bowl. Bank of America Stadium is smaller than even some college venues and is not domed.
Boston does not have the infrastructure for an influx of tourists that large. lodging yes, but i don’t want to imagine how much worse that would make traffic
2:24 19 is nice in upstate New York lol
Also 5 inches isn’t bad considering I live in the snowiest city in the US (Syracuse)
7:39 that's Baltimore not Washington DC
Rt as to say Baltimore is built in help for DC but not even considered
Unfortunately I agree with Buffalo. I have been there, and it is my favorite place to go. The fans are amazing. The stadium feel like its away from the rest of the craziness. While the stadium itself isn't the best, there really are no bad seats there. Just a lot of fun. Been to Pitt, Cle, Philly, and Chi too. Buffalo is by far my favorite.
Seattle and Denver too.
Denver, Seattle,
Nashville and Charlotte will not host a Super Bowl game anytime soon.
7:41 you showed a picture of Baltimore when the teams weren't the ravens.
Would you host a Super Bowl in Baltimore?
Yes... yes I would.
Jacksonville will never host a Superbowl again. It does not have the hotel space.
It's been 60 in Cincinnati in February before. Never say never
Pittsburgh is another city that will never host the Superbowl. It is a big market but the stadium only holds roughly 64,000. Also the infrastructure or lack there of not many ways in or out of the city and stadium. Also weather sucks in February
Denver, Seattle, Baltimore and Washington are missing from this list.
Wasn't D.C. actually ON the list?
@@codycrossman5791 I totally missed that it was lumped in with Philly and Chicago. Thanks for the correction 👍🏻
Seattle, Baltimore, and Denver will also never host a Super Bowl because it's too cold in those three cities.
London too, or any UK city
You can have a super bowl in a cold weather state only if they play in a dome just like they did when the super bowl was play in Minnesota and Detroit one time. Plus also if you realize they always have the super bowl in warm weather states and cites that are big market cuz it brings more business and gives people something to do and bring the city money etc.
Detroit has actually hosted twice and so had Minneapolis. Detroit played the 1982,Super Bowl at the Silverdome & 2006 at Ford Field. Minneapolis hosted in 1992 at their old dome and in 2018. Hell it gets cold in Indianapolis & they hosted in 2012. I think all 3 could host again.
Surprised you didn't include Denver. As a Coloradan and Broncos fan I hope Denver gets a super bowl someday!
Chicago bears has bought land just outside of chicago where the old Arlington park race track was and will build a dome and then will get a super bowl probably multiple ones as the city has a lot to offer to traveling fans
Gotta love TPS, the same few clips and repeating the same thing over and over to make a 12 minute video
I always say why not just use the stadium in St. Louis that the Rams played in as a spot to host the Superbowl, it's just sitting there and could be renovated easily
The area around the stadium is much too cramped. This is also why the stadium never hosted the Super Bowl while the Rams were there.
If the Edward Jones Dome hosted the Superbowl it would have made the substandard tier on the video called every stadium that hosted the Superbowl. If Candlestick Park managed to host Superbowl 37 instead of Qualcomm Stadium. It would have made the How On Earth Did They Host tier. The stadium category tier list. If the Astrodome hosted the Superbowl it too along with the Edward Jones Dome would have made the Substandard tier.
1. Top Level
2. Above Average
3. Good For it's Era
4. Average
5. Substandard
6. How on earth did they host?
Once Superbowls 56 and 58 both happen. SoFi Stadium and Allegiance Stadium will both be in the Top Level Category.
Denver is kind of the obvious one left out of this video. Our winter climate is milder than most people think, we have the infrastructure to support a large influx of visitors on Super Bowl week. However, the climate and an open air stadium isn’t enough to convince the NFL to host a Super Bowl here. On top of that, Denver isn’t going to build a domed stadium anytime soon. Our stadium, whatever it’s name happens to be this week, is only about 20 years old.
Didn’t mention Bank of America stadium in Charlotte nc
TPS can you answer my question please, Is that a probability that the Super Bowl can come to Baltimore in the M&T BANK STADIUM of the Baltimore Ravens?
I just never understand why all the NFL teams have a Football Dome that way no games can be delayed do to Heavy Snow or Thunderstorms I get maybe it’s a culture thing for most franchises but look at the NBA they don’t do outdoors every NBA team has an Arena for their fans to be all warmed up I think the NFL should step in and Force all NFL Teams to have a Dome so that Every NFL Teams can a least host a Super Bowl
The team owners would never force that on the other owners who don’t have domed stadiums
So Baltimore’s still got a chance :)
Baltimore i think doesn’t have a chance but id love to go there for the big game just because thats my home team
Seattle wa will never host the super bowl
Too cold.
Seattle hosting an outdoor superbowl would be awesome!
There's another team in the West that was forgotten about; like Denver.
@@JoeVideoed
The video didn't even mention Charlotte or Nashville.
@@shauncameron8390 Didn't Charlotte host at least 1? Also, maybe the host thinks those 2 might be in play in the future.
I wonder if NFL raised the stakes for NFL Pro Bowl the Winner of NFL Pro Bowl game NFC or AFC including hosting a Super Bowl for AFC championship or NFC championship a home game and new rule change that Super Bowl Champions received the 1 draft pick and 32 the draft pick order the NFL runner up received 2 the draft pick order and 31 the draft pick order and all the NFL Playoffs team's would get higher draft picks number then the NFL teams with worst record would have lower draft picks number another rule change the NFL have no preseason games NFL the Hall Of Fame game starts 20 game regular the NFL including no more NFL ties there must be a winner would be adding college football Sutton death rule if both teams received ball on 25 yard line and both teams score a touchdown and extra point or 2 point conversion the next over time their no time limit their be a winner , another rule change their be three bye weeks in case NFL was infected from COVID 19
It could happen 18 game NFL regular season cutting down preseason games two
@@bluelightingwolf85 👍👍👍👍
Tennesse and Philly I think would be great places to host an SB. Nashville would welcome it with open arms and loud music.
Cincinnati should work on building an indoor practice facility before they try to replace that piece of garbage stadium they have.
I'm surprised Baltimore wasn't listed with it's fellow AFC North cites there's no way in heck Baltimore would host before Chicago and Philadelphia and even those are impossible
Number 1: Washington
That trash heap of a stadium is barely standing, thanks to the Worst Owner in the NFL.
Sad thing is it's only 25 years old and it a worse condition that the old stadiums used by some classic teams like Chicago, KC and GB.
@@nexuseagles6279 because good ol' Danny boy never really invested in FedEx field despite steadily increasing the prices on quite literally everything.
@@nexuseagles6279 In Chicago, KC, and GB the stadiums are a part of the city's history and identity. They are cared for and maintained. Renovations when needed are easy to finance. FedEx was never that good of a stadium and it struggles to get the sorely needed renovations as no one likes the stadium and would rather have a new one built, but the owner won't do it
@@yujirohanma5199 Well I can't name anything Dan has done right especially with the lastest stunt. The Washington commanders....commies. I honestly feel horrible for Washington due to synder and am an Eagles fan.
@@themandalorian400 My QB and some of our fans nearly got hurt because of a falling rail this year at FedEx. I get it but it only 25 years olds and it's a Lawsuit waiting to happen with the safely and heath concerns. I understand some owners are awful and have no clue how to run a team but they at least keep their stadiums serviceable. Synder like every thing else he's given manages to screw that up.
Dang was that all outdoor stadiums? Lol