Megalopolis - Movie Review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 июн 2024
- TWITTER:
/ expert_oscar
/ withbrotherbro
LETTERBOXD:
letterboxd.com/theoscarexpert/
letterboxd.com/brotherbro/
DISCORD:
/ discord
Award Expert App:
IOS: apps.apple.com/us/app/award-e...
ANDROID: play.google.com/store/apps/de... 
Развлечения
Brother Bro solo video debut 🫡
and that for one of the most anticipated and discussed movies of all time
🫡
Everyone wanted n needed that!!!!
@@palemoonlight96yeah, gotta say this movie is def not that.
I feel a little sad whenever a movie flops these days, especially movies trying something different, because the entire business of making films for theaters is teetering on an edge of profitability right now and I want it to continue as long as possible.
are theaters actually teetering on profitability after barbenheimer? after top gun maverick? eeaao? poor things did very well at the box office too, and i’m pretty sure films like american fiction and past lives made back their budgets too. it’s mostly the big $300 million blockbusters and the art house foreign films (anatomy of a fall, zone of interest, etc.) that seem to be struggling financially. i could be wrong, but we’ve been saying theaters are struggling, but right as we start saying it again, another film comes out and breaks box office records or breaks out into the mainstream on an indie budget. idk, i could still be wrong 🤷♂️🤷♂️
@@BROJANGSTER There are a handful of exceptions, but the global box office for 2023 adjusted for inflation was about half the global box office of the average from 2017 to 2019. And 2024 so far is looking worse than 2023. You look back just a couple of years and almost all movies were profitable. Now it seems most are not profitable, with just a handful of "you need to see it in theaters" success stories. Very few people go to the movies just to go to movies anymore.
@@BROJANGSTER Cinemas don’t keep most of the box office revenue, it goes to the studios, especially at the start of a film’s theatrical run when most people will see a film. Cinemas get a bigger slice of the box office in the latter stages of a film’s theatrical window, however by then fewer people will be buying tickets.
Cinemas rely heavily on the concessions stand for their income and in some cases that might even be the majority of their revenue.
@@BROJANGSTER Art movies often get financing from other sources like grants and public funding at least outside the US and often don't cost too much to make so I don't think those are struggling as much. The ones that have really struggled are mid-tier movies in the US. Some have done well like Civil War but that's more the exception.
@@ssssssstssssssss ok, didn't know that. but still, movies like past lives, american fiction, and civil war are doing well at the box office. i already mentioned eeaao, and now challengers is the latest mid budget film to at least make back its budget and marketing costs (if $50+ million counts as "mid budget"). bottom line, people still wanna go to the movies, you just gotta make good movies (*cough* *cough* disney *COUGH*)
Ngl this movie having such a disastrous reputation only makes me want to see it more.
Ngl urgay
@@nikkingmanNo he's not from Uruguay.
And it made me want to see it less. Don’t waste my time with shit
Yep, already this is gonna be a 'cult' movie.
Oscar Expert by himself in a video I'm used to. Brother Bro by himself on the other hand...
Enough to make a grown man go into heat
Is also great!
Which one is who?
In other words, Coppola seems to have been high for the last 40 years.
Justin did a really good job going solo this video!
Im hearbroken. I think what happened is that studios have told him to be as safe as possible his howle career so he decided to make a 180. But Hollywood let alone our culture does not see things on a individual basis which if Megapolis fails all future original auter films with blockbuster budgets that aren't Nolan will go down with it.
Im still going to see this opening night in IMAX knowing that it will be messy.
Wait hold up. Brother Bro is now in charge?
I think he went to canne pretending to be the Oscar expert
He went to Cannes this year and the Oscar Expert did not.
@@gabrielcastaneda9700 lol who could tell
Always been
They said previously that only he could go to Cannes this year, so he's recording the reactions.
What I’m reminded of, hearing various things about this, is Terry Gilliam’s The Man Who Killed Don Quixote. Like Coppola, Gilliam had tried getting that film off the ground for MANY years, with multiple different actors in the lead roles. There’s even a documentary that was made about the attempts to make the film. And then he finally got the film made (also starring Adam Driver, ironically enough), and the film was… decent. It’s not up to par with any of Gilliam’s previous masterpieces during his prime, but you can tell where the heart and passion was, and why Gilliam wanted to make it. So at least that film had that. This… I have so many questions, with all that I’m hearing about it.
This is a good/bad comparison in te same time, since The Man Who Killed Don Quixote is not an original idea, it is very much based on the literary classic, but with a twist.
Also, no one cared for The Man Who Killed Don Quixote, it has only 22K votes on IMDB and a box office of $2.4 million, Megalopolis will be much more widely seen, at least, among cinephiles.
The worst thing ahout don quioxte was how generic it was especially structurally, it doesn't feel like it's taking any risks..i hope megalopolis does
@@manantial773 I guess I can see your point. You could say TMWKDQ is more well known for the efforts to get the movie made (including the Lost In La Mancha documentary) than the actual movie itself. With this, I’m not sure how many times Coppola tried making this movie, if he tried with other actors and so on, but I don’t know if there’ll be a making-of documentary with this one.
I read something that might explain this film.
It's a movie about making a movie. Is that at all possible?
@@fruitsy_ It's Coppola, it will certainly take risks. Did you see Youth without Youth? Another later and the best among his later films. The issue with Megalopolis seems to be that it lacks substance, not that it lacks risks.
Thanks for the Shout Out Brother 🫡
You're welcome, bro.
...love you
Time for me to drop everything, Oscar expert has come out with a new video
W.
I'm checking Brother Bro's twitter a couple of times a day, just to see what's up. Doing a very good job with the updates. I hope you and Oscar Expert can both go Cannes next year. I've heard it's a very good time over there. Exciting time of the year.
I'm really excited to see Megalopolis.
Shame on film twitter nerds who haven't even seen it doxxing and attacking the critics at Cannes who gave negative thoughts. We have to stop this mindset over there that everything has to "rock" or "rule". You don't have to pretend to like everything.
We love this brother bro keep it up! Love to see it
"But you should go see it because... you know, what the hell"
Hoping Oscar Expert does his review on this fall. 🤣💯
At what point does Brother Bro get promoted to co-Oscar Expert and the channel becomes The Oscar Experts
No. The Brother Bro Expert.
It's always felt like The Oscar Experts (plural) to me, ever since I discovered this channel years ago. Never understood why the channel is called The Oscar Expert, in singular, but it's hosted by two people, only one of whom is the oscar expert in question (so the name of a two-person channel is the pseudonym of just one of the two persons), while the other one is just "Brother Bro", despite the fact that both of them appear to have similar movie and Oscars knowledge (from what I've seen). That was a long-winded sentence, sorry lol
@@Robalexe I think that in the beginning Justin wasn't in the video. He just helped film them.
@@kassiogomes8498 At this point adding an s at the end of the channel's name feels more appropriate though
I’ve been curious about this film going back to when I first heard about it as a kid in the early 90s! I remember when John Cusack was his choice to front the film. It’s crazy & exciting to see that Coppola finally got his white whale… but sweet baby Gebus the reaction to it has not been good. It’s sad considering everything it took to make and everything he’s gone through personally (his wife’s passing). Regardless of quality or using it’s 100million dollar budget well I am so curious just to watch the thing. Bat shit crazy Neil Breen esque epic was never what I expected from Coppola but that’s piqued my interest even more!? That’s insane!
Do you think it could be edited into a better film? Like either go total trippy or totally linear narrative? It sounds like the tone is two different, or three different films needing to be separated.
Ever since watching challengers, I can’t help but think yall look like mike faist. My friends who watched challengers with me said they fancy brother bro
I mean, my hopes for this movie weren't strong, but comparing it to The Room was not at all what I was expecting
I’m so looking forward to see this - and that the reviews are so divergent only makes it more interesting.
Megaflopolis confirmed?
No, Half-Billion Dollar Club.
@@Wired4Life2 wouldn't that be something
MegaHITopolis
Never thought we'd get solo Brother Bro
Other than similarities in name alone - "Megalopolis", "Metropolis" - do you think there are any comparisons to this film and the 1927 classic? From the look of it, it seems that it has the aesthetic of "Babylon" and story of "Metropolis".
So it’s if Ayn Rand made a movie? She was never questioned by her inner circle, surrounding herself with yes people, and shunning anyone that would give logical reasoning against her philosophy.
Are you a socialist angry about Rand dismantling it?
@@actualityfilms nah, I’m a realist that knows that any power vacuum will be filled and in that regard the powerful men argument of history and social dynamics crumbles.
@@josefonseca6144 In either case I can tell that Coppola's film sucks. He has a huge ego but lack discipline.Ingmar Bergman didn't make gaudy and incoherent junky films when he was an old man.
Brother bro is going to love kinds of kindness. I’m predicting it.
He does not get Lanthimos, neither of them does.
@@manantial773 why do you say that?
I love you Mike Faist ❤
Thank you for this review. It sounds like there were no test screenings? I plan to be there opening weekend when it opens in the U.S. because I'm a Coppola fan.
Coppola and test screenings?! Hahaha.
You slammed dunk this review. Very helpful. Thank you.
Good point, FFC is factor that pique my intellectual curiosity for the film. LOL, that said, if Neil Breen made a movie with the same cast and scale it would pique my morbid curiosity just as much.
Someone called this Coppola’s “Chi-Raq.”
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Very insightful review
Brother bro with the strongest debut since Celine Song
I hope it still gets a theatrical run. Coppola once described the movie as "a beautiful girl you cannot have". It sounds like the film is too heavy with its themes and collapses under its own weight.
Still really looking forward to it. The comparisons drawn in these reactions are crazy. Everything from Wachiowski to Tommy Wiseau to Neil Breen!!! Insane
BROTHER BRO!!!!!!
I've heard this film called a piece of art on a par with Picasso's Guernica and a flop on a par with The Room.🤷♂️
Justin, you are the man!!
needed to see u alone to realize you look like Mike Faist
There is no need to be confused, as some are here, about whether Brother Bro wants the film to be a box-office hit. His take is more nuanced than that. As he describes it, the movie is an honest interesting failure - made by one of the great visionary artists of our times. An epic failure worth talking about and figuring out what went wrong. Why wouldn't you want your friends to go see such a fascinating oddity? In the end, the movie doesn't seem to work even on its own terms, and not everyone will be interested in something like that, obviously, but great artists are entitled to their mistakes and follies. We owe them everything. That's the thing that will draw people to the theater - certainly not enough of them to turn the movie into a financial success (and from everything we know, it's shaping up to be a huge box-office flop). But Francis Ford Coppola doesn't care about the money - that's why he invested his own fortune, he was savvy and cleare-eyed enough about its commercial prospects to know that no studio would give him the money to make it - and he himself sounds remarkably blase about actually getting a return on his investments when all is said and done. He's made peace with that. You've got to honor that. It's called artistic integrity (which few people talk about these days and may well be the source of people's confusion). Let's talk about THAT, and put aside the issue of whether the film will make a killing at the box office. In order for the film to "do well" at the box office, it would have be one of the biggest blockbusters of all time. As far as I can tell, no one ever thought that was going to happen; certainly not Coppola - but clearly he was never banking on it to begin with.
Are we going to get other reviews?
Does anyone knows when it will be released internationally ?
Brother bro solo debut fuck yes!
Which of the two of you appear in the movie Challengers ¿
Bo Is NOT Afraid. He's doing well.
Anybody know the movie quote that goes something like “when things are good we feel them way up here but when they’re bad we feel them way down here” not exact quote but it’s driving me crazy
im a avid watcher of the fantasy filmball yt channel, very amazing stuff!
Good job Brother Bro! Enjoy France :)
Great job bro bro
I’ve been waiting to hear about this…
I really like your comparison to The Room, because I’ve been getting that kinda vibe this whole time. also… did they really show 9/11 in it?
The last time Coppola made a film that was anywhere near Oscar nominations was "John Grisham's The Rainmaker" (1997), which garnered buzz for both Danny DeVito and Jon Voight in supporting roles but ultimately failed to make it to Oscar.
I really liked Tetro, though it didn't garner any Oscar noms. I also know alotta people didn't like Tetro at all, so it's not considered a masterpiece or anything like that. Definitely the best Coppola flick of the last few decades tho, imo
So would you like this film to do well at the box office or not? Because you said it's a 3/10 but you also said people should go and see it and bring friends too 😂 I'm confused 😅
No need to be confused. As he describes it, the movie is an honest interesting failure - made by one of the great visionary artists of our times. An epic failure worth talking about and figuring out what went wrong. Why wouldn't you want your friends to go see such a fascinating oddity? Not everyone will be interested in something like that, obviously, but great artists are entitled to their mistakes and follies. That's the thing that will draw people to the theater - certainly not enough of them to turn the movie into a financial success (and from everything we know, it looks to be a huge box-office flop). But Francis Ford Coppola doesn't care about the money - that's why he invested his own fortune, he was savvy and cleare-eyed enough about its commercial prospects to know that no studio would give him the money to make it - and he himself sounds remarkably blase about actually getting a return on his investments. He's made peace with that. You've got to honor that. It's called artistic integrity (which few people talk about these days and may well be the source of your confusion). Let's talk about THAT, and put aside the issue of whether the film will make a killing at the box office. In order for the film to "do well" at the box office, it would have be one of the biggest blockbusters of all time. No one ever thought that was going to happen; certainly not Coppola - but clearly he was never banking on it to begin with.
@@ralphsepulveda5335 still, life is too short to intentionally watch bad movies. That's my view.
You must be 12, nothing confusing in his review. The movie will do TERRIBLE at the box office.
@@manantial773 And that's why my question was whether he'd like it to do well, not whether it'll do well. A distinction that even a 12 year old can make.
People did not like Apocalypse Now when it was released, the critics gave it terrible reviews just like Megalopolis is getting. Today Apocalypse Now is one of his best films.
This sounds like it would have been a better animated film. IF you are going to make an art film you may as well use the medium of paint or drawing, or art. Then at least, it would satisfy that need.
Did you see Kinds of kindness ?
The actor said they were just sitting around a lot and they weren't really sure what was going to happen because Coppola was writing the movie as they went along. It'd be sitting in his trailer waiting for inspiration and they'd have to just sit there and entertain themselves waiting for him to come up with some great idea. It's really a stupid way of doing things and it almost destroyed him in his career on Apocalypse now. In the end everyone loved apocalypse now including me. But you know what's wrong with starting with a script?
This is the first time I prejudged a movie by deciding I’m going to love it before I’ve watched the movie.
Looking forward to the film. (Giving me vibes of southland tales, titus, cloud atlas and chi-raq- all films I adore)
Ambition goes a loooong way for me.
I could never financially support this film though due to the casting of von voight. Voight is as vile a creature as they come.
"Megalopolis". More like Mega...Lop...i'm gay.
Thanks for sharing your reaction
Brother Bro just coooked Coppola 🤣👏🏼 love it
Bumper sticker is brilliant
I cant wait to see it, but Francis Ford Coppla’s best movies are the godfather and 1992’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula
Coppola's golden age vanished in this modern age of movie industry. He should kept in his shelf
I wish Babylon had this much hype :(
Babylon was so amazing
Is it a " So bad it's good," movie?
I know a lot of people r disappointed in the reviews but I’m just as excited as I was before, I never expected a masterpiece, I just wanted to c Coppola explore his final passion project & it sounds like we got that, the only disappointing part of this review to me was the bumper sticker comparison with the themes, as long as it feels unique I think I’ll be happy with it tho
Maybe Francis should have gone ahead with his idea of filming Ain Rand's The Fountainhead...
Copolla does not make good films anymore for a couple decades now. I would love, LOVE, for that to be untrue, and that I am wrong....but he's just not doing good work anymore. Proof of that is his director's cut, re-releases of his classic movies. He's ruined The Outsiders and Apocalypse with his recuts.
Haven't seen it but it sounds like it is destined to be a Cult Film. Such films are rarely successful, on first release, but thay play for decades and have a following and end up being a subject taught about in film and art schools.
Also, I am reminded of when Coppola was doing Apocalypse Now and was over budget and MIA on location and the studio couldn't find him. Not unlike Marlon Brando's character in the plot.
I like your analogy that Driver's Character was mirroring Coppola, in a way. Driver's Character was trying to create something big and great while trying to convince people of his vision and the politics around all that.
I was a Philosophy student in college and I understand much of this film was based on Greek literature and Philosophy. So, I would probably get some references that many people wouldn't.
I already know this film will be studied for decades in film schools. Either for being ahead of it's time or what NOT to do in making a film.
Sounds like Coppola was letting actors do what they wanted to do.
Justin's like : move over cole, this is my time to shine now!!!!
Deservedly so, i would say!!!!!
“Failed” films by good directors often become cults. John Boorman’s “Zardoz” (1974) is a personal favorite. That Could also happen with this one. Besides, anyone can be a critic.
I am looking forward to nia dacosta Hedda
The Brother Bro Expert
I'm going to watch it, regardless. I suspect from everything I've heard and read. Coppola stubbornly held on to this project for so long. He took a minimalist approach to direction and allowed the actors to self-direct. Editing will be the winning or losing stroke for this film. In your judgement, it clearly lost. Hopefully, I can make sense of it.
A 2, a 4, and a 6 at the same time. Damn lol
ahhhh so that what A24 is an an abbreviation to.
Well, maybe you're right, we'll know for sure in about 20 years!
Lol
I've also heard that this movie was a mess, but I've heard critics describe it more as a brilliant phenomenal mess though! 😂 So I still want to see it out of curiosity and judge for myself. After all, I owe it to the legendary Francis Ford Coppola.
5:22 “ideated in a slightly altered state” yeah the altered state is francis being old
Francis is a known heavy cannabis user lol.
I would love to see a 100 million dollar Neil Bren movie!
They should definitely give Neil Breen a $100 million to make a movie. That would be amazing on so many levels.
These decades in the making passion projects never turn out well, no matter who's project it is.
Like Boyhood. That was horrible.
Passion projects mostly turns out terrible.....
You're just edgy
Self financed = RED FLAG
Just look at Avatar
@GTAxpertPlay overhyped garbage that only rips off better movies. It does appeal to the brainless sheep tho.
A fair swap. I would want to go to Cannes if I was Brother Bro.
So sad to see Coppola (the great Coppola) saying goodbye to the Cinema making with this "Turkey" but I haven't seen the film yet. But let's face.. It looks "The Turkey" of the year. 🏆
Great review, wild neck vein
Coppola is a rich, old, self indulgent hack at this point. There are so many master directors who made great films in old age that are coherent, interesting and profound.
It has always been his nature, but he is now demonstrating it in a manner that is devoid of any semblance of regret. Kindly accept this reality.
@@jagmeetjhajj Accept that Coppola is more nakedly self indulgent and inept? I can see even ihe trailers that his own decadence is the main feature of the film. Coppola is a pot head and from what I've hear is also a porn addict.
Even if it’s a commercial failure, I’m still extremely happy it got made and his way
"Dump to myself about this"? What? lol
Can we get Adam Driver in a great movie again please
This movie is gonna be like the man who killed Don Quixote or Crimes of the future. Old filmmaker, massive budget, white protagonist guy who talks about philosophy
Love dystopian science fiction hope ill like it!
Everyone here should see "The Man Who Killed Don Quixote." Borderline masterpiece.
It sounds like a twisted "The Fountainhead with Ayn Rand, Howard Roark, Guy Francon, Dominique Francon and Peter Keating all on acid.
I'd love that movie, unfortunately this looks more hunger games than fountain head
he said that he thought perhaps Coppola has a mind set that says only powerful people shape society. As well he said this is how we are taught history. I believe that IS how society worked before the enlightenment and the founding of the USA. So perhaps Coppola did this to reflect the way Rome worked and perhaps he was Trying to tell a story in a way romans would tell a story. This is a fat perhaps, I have not seen the movie so maybe Coppola did it just because that’s the way he believes the world should work. Even if he did it, not because it was personal ideology, but because it works with the story, he was trying to tell. His ideology probably still aligns with it somewhat. Otherwise he probably wouldn’t have told that story.
Bro justified weed consumption dang dang 🤕
People tend to project thier ideas in movie. And return dissapointed. Just like u have craze before u get something and once u get it you tend to loose intrest.
I knew it!
This is sad I really love Francis Ford Coppola I'm still going to see it if I can
Exactly……what I expected from the trailers. Not sure why, but yeah.
I sense this movie will need multiple viewings
Nope, it sounds empty and shallow.
@@manantial773 Bad take
I got the vibe it’s a bootleg Ayn Rand film. Is this accurate?
Slightly ayn rand, but not bootleg
It sounds like Youth Without Youth to me. Ambitious on paper, seems like it should be really interesting, but...is forgettable. I do remember Coppola's last movie, Twixt, which reminded me of bad student films I made in school. Not what I was expecting from the auteur of the Godfather. Have to admit that, when Tarantino talks about directors aging poorly, he has to mean Coppola....