For some reason Packet Tracer was requiring that I add a space in the interface IDs when configuring the static routes. E.g. I had to write "g 0/0" instead of "g0/0" like normal. Hope that helps if anyone was having trouble.
I did this on my own. I was sturggling in my first try as ? / context sensitive help was not helpful. I was first just specifying next hop ip add, it was giving error, and when i only specified it's exit interface g0/0 pings were unsuccesfull. I restarted the whole lab, and this time I put exit interface g0/0 and then the next hop ip address, and it worked. I then came to this video, and found out I did it correctly. Thank you so much for making this lab
Thanks Jeremy. I am following the lab sequence. In this lab I decided to check IPv4 pings PC - PC first, it didn't work, was debugging it for a while, then realized that both PCs had .1 address instead of .2 :) IPv6 went easier.
While Jeremy suffered captivity in Vietnam, his jailer once pulled out a gun then placed a router and a switch side by side on the ground. Jeremy was forced to choose. Please don't ever ask him about his choice, please.
Thanks for these great study materials, they are really helpful! When I tried the lab before watching the video, the pings didn't go through at first. After a bit of troubleshooting I noticed I misconfigured the routes by only specifying the outgoing interface but not the next-hop address as well. Apparantly, that doesn't work. I fixed the issue and the pings worked. Now I know and I will remember how to configure IPv6 routes properly. Thanks a lot, Jeremy! You're doing something great with this course!
I was struggling to understand why #ipv6 route 2001:db8:0:1::/64 FE80::201:63FF:FEB0:B801 or #ipv6 route 2001:db8:0:1::/64 g0/0 weren't working. :-D Thanks Jeremy for all your efforts. Keep up the good work!
My pings simply do not work. I re did the entire lab for about 6-7 times trying to figure out what's wrong. In the end I finally decided I will do everything exactly as you did in the video and follow along, but still my pings are failing by "request timed out". I spent hours trying to do the lab, but guess I'll just move on considering it has to be a packet tracer bug.. note: I am able to ping both the default gateway
Is anyone else have this lab broken for them? Double checked the configs three times and IpV6 pings not coming in. Ipv4 is working alight Edit nevermind. I think it was because of not Issuing the ipv6 unicast-routing on R2. I will go to sleep now
Hi Jeremy, long time no see :) first, thank you for this informative video. second, on minute 16:45, the int range command is available only on switches not on routers.
@@JeremysITLab Yeah, I was busy preparing for my CCNP Security exam that's why I wasn't able to watch some of your more recent videos (which I enjoy a lot :) ). You are right, I tried it on 2811 and 2911 routers on packet tracer and also on IOSv router on gns3 and the command syntax does exist. Funny, I am almost sure I tried it before somewhere and it didn't work. Maybe it was also on Boson NetSIM :)
You you still doing this course? I’ve finished it a while back but haven’t taken the exam yet as I’ve had no money. I’m down to review with you and possibly answer any questions but I doubt you’ll have any with how good the instruction is!
Not sure why. I have no errors with any of the other labs, but when opening this one I am told it's not compatible with this version of Packet Tracer, running version 8.0.1.0064. Following along by video, and greatly appreciate all of your content.
Hi sir, can we get your ppt you are referring, so that we can take a print of that and study simultaneously? It would make the things more easier to refer the past topics covered by you.
Hi Jeremy, about the link-local addresses, when do you usually need to manually configure link-local addresses? From a udemy tutorial, I know that you configure it when the auto-generated addresses are complicated.
You never 'need' to configure the manually unless two devices have the same MAC address and therefore generate the same link-local address (which shouldn't happen). You can configure them if you want to make them something simpler like FE80::1, FE80::2, etc
I might be mistaken, but it appears that cisco ios doesnt allow the use of interface range when it comes to serial connections. Correct me if i'm wrong.
Couple of things that threwme off here. as always I tried completing the lab without watching the video. when I got the error message when setting the ipv6 route command I then re did the command only using the interface as the next hop on both routers, that didnt work. watched the video re entered the command and pings were only getting through 75% of the time. I forgot to no commanad my original routes. I am sure I will learn in the next video I am guessing it didnt work as we are using link-local addresses on the ppp network and not unique local addresses.
I do not know why, but when I am trying to open this lab file I get an error - "The file .... is not compatible with this version of Packet Tracer." Other files works fine. The version of Packet Tracer is 8.0.0.0212. Thank you in advance for your help!
Hey Jeremy, so I don't know if an update to Packet Tracer might have changed things, but when trying to configure the static routes I keep getting this. R2(config)#ipv6 route 2001:db8::/64 g0/0 FE80::230:F2FF:FE36:4501 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. It's indicating that the interface is an invalid input, but if I don't put it there it says that I need to include the interface like so. R2(config)#ipv6 route 2001:db8::/64 FE80::230:F2FF:FE36:4501 % Interface has to be specified for a link-local nexthop Any idea what might be causing this? I enabled ipv6 unicast-routing on both routers as well. Thanks for any feedback!
Hey Jeremy thanks for yet another amazing video. I have a couple of questions: why is ipv6 enable command unavailable in Boson unlike in packet tracer and how is that command different from ipv6 unicast routing? Also in Boson I’m getting a non-12-hex value for MAC address on interfaces for the same lab, it’s showing something else when I run show ipv6 interfaces brief. Thank you for your time and lectures which are gold.
Hi John, if you have technical questions about Boson NetSim I recommend asking Boson. In NetSim you can go to Help > Support > Submit Support Ticket, or go here: www.boson.com/contact-us
Q: For the static route from R1 to PC2. Both has g0/0 and i am confuse which one you are referring to . Is it: #R1:ipv6 route [x.x.x.x/64, R1 INT PORT ,FE80] OR #R1:ipv6 route [x.x.x.x/64, R2 INT PORT, FE80]. Please help
When configuring the routers G0/1 interfaces ipv6 address, why didn't you specify the ipv6 address as ::1 as indicated on the topology? Or have I missed something here?
hmm, after completing this LAB my ping stats are only %50 from either PC. Seems like every other time I send it, the Routers forget the link-local addresses and need to initiate NDP again which drops the frame. Any ideas?
Hi Jeremy, if multiple nodes have IPv6 addresses with identical last 6 hex digits within a network, will they have identical solicited-node multicast address? Won't it cause problem for NDR within the network?
DAD (duplicate address detection, I mention it in Day 33), which is also sent to the solicited-node multicast address, should detect any problems like that beforehand
@@JeremysITLab Sorry I did not ask clearly. I meant when interface ids are different while the last 6 hex digits are same. They are not duplicate IP but will have same last 6 hex digits. My apology that I posted this question on the wrong session. I meant to post it on day 33 but my mistake.
i can't understand why i have thos error message this is my conf : R1(config)#ipv6 route 2001:db8:0:1::/64 g0/0 FE80::201:63FF:FEB0:B801 % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Hi Jeremy, instead of using the link-local as the next hop, i configured the static route just using the exit interface. On R1: ipv6 route 2001:DB8:0:1::/64 GigabitEthernet0/0 On R2: ipv6 route 2001:DB8::/64 GigabitEthernet0/0 This does not work. Am I doing anything wrong? Both PC1 and PC2 are able to ping the default gateway without any issues?
I had the same issue. I also typed his ipv6 route command word for word including the g0/0 interface before the next-hop address and it didn't recognize it as a command for some reason.
@@Dennis-n6u He explains it in the next lecture, i believe. IPv6 static routes have to be configured fully specificied. Please confirm though. It's been a while since I have thought about IPv6.
Hi and thank you for a great course! Planning on taking the exam during this month. I tried configuring the static routes with interfaces instead of link-local address, but didn't work for me. Packet Tracer issue?
Good luck on the exam! In IPv6, you can't specify only the interface, you'll need to specify the next-hop IP also (or specify just the next-hop IP). I mention this in the next video, Day 33 (IPv6 part 3).
Jeremy, When u configured the static route on R1 you specified g0/0 before the link local next hop address. Is that the R1s g0/0 interface or R2s g0/0 interface ?
If i enter eui 64 command without entering the command ipv6 unicast-routing and i enter it later,do the configuration still valid? Does the ping will work?
@@JeremysITLab Ok, 1-I first did all configurations but didn't enter the ipv6 unicast-routing command and tried to ping from pc1 to pc2 and i had no reply. 2-Then i entered just the command ipv6 unicast-r and tried again and i had a reply from the default gateway of pc2 (R2 g0/1) : ''destination host unreachable''. 3- so i re-entered eui-64 command on g0/1 R1-R2 interfaces and tried to ping on more time and this time, finally, worked! but why did i receive answer from the default gateway on the second attempt?..thanks so much!
I have passed my ccna exam today with 924/1000 score, had no IT experience prior, thank you Jeremy!
AWESOME score! Congrats, you must have studied very hard. Best of luck with your next step!
So cool to hear!
congrats, what resources do u use other than jeremy.
Hi Milo. What did you use to pass it? Just this playlist?
Can you provide some study tips?
For some reason Packet Tracer was requiring that I add a space in the interface IDs when configuring the static routes. E.g. I had to write "g 0/0" instead of "g0/0" like normal. Hope that helps if anyone was having trouble.
the best feeling is troubleshooting for the longest and getting the ping back. THANKS JEREMY!
I did this on my own. I was sturggling in my first try as ? / context sensitive help was not helpful. I was first just specifying next hop ip add, it was giving error, and when i only specified it's exit interface g0/0 pings were unsuccesfull. I restarted the whole lab, and this time I put exit interface g0/0 and then the next hop ip address, and it worked. I then came to this video, and found out I did it correctly. Thank you so much for making this lab
Thanks Jeremy. I am following the lab sequence.
In this lab I decided to check IPv4 pings PC - PC first, it didn't work, was debugging it for a while, then realized that both PCs had .1 address instead of .2 :)
IPv6 went easier.
Oops! Seems I was focused on IPv6 and got careless with IPv4. I'll fix it later and re-upload the file! Thanks for pointing it out :)
It is hard to find words to express my gratitude, I'll forever be grateful .
Thank you Jeremy 🙏🙏🙏
Thanks Muhaned :)
While Jeremy suffered captivity in Vietnam, his jailer once pulled out a gun then placed a router and a switch side by side on the ground. Jeremy was forced to choose. Please don't ever ask him about his choice, please.
Thanks for these great study materials, they are really helpful! When I tried the lab before watching the video, the pings didn't go through at first. After a bit of troubleshooting I noticed I misconfigured the routes by only specifying the outgoing interface but not the next-hop address as well. Apparantly, that doesn't work. I fixed the issue and the pings worked. Now I know and I will remember how to configure IPv6 routes properly. Thanks a lot, Jeremy! You're doing something great with this course!
The best study material for the ccna
Really the greatest course on the youtube , thank you Jeremy
Thanks for watching :)
We must atleast like and subscriber to thank Jeremy for the intelligent and hardwork he has done
Another lab completed... Thanks so much Jeremy.
Thanks Jeremy. You are doing best. Great course on RUclips.
Thanks Sandip!
Thank you Jeremy this CCNA course is really helpful
Thank you :)
very good lab, very helpful to understand ipv6
i'm doing all of those labs and enjoying it plenty. thank you
Thanks for the effort you put into this
Thank you sir!!.
Thanks for watching :)
Thanks Jeremy!
Awsome..loved it, thank you!
Glad you liked it :)
Thanks!
Thanks so much for the tip! Sorry for the late reply, just noticed this. I appreciate your support :)
the best of the best>>> thank you so much
Thank you, Omar :)
@@JeremysITLab I hope I can do more than "thanking you"
Thanks
thank you very much ,
always the best
Thank you :)
Excellent ... well done ...
I was struggling to understand why #ipv6 route 2001:db8:0:1::/64 FE80::201:63FF:FEB0:B801 or #ipv6 route 2001:db8:0:1::/64 g0/0 weren't working. :-D Thanks Jeremy for all your efforts. Keep up the good work!
Glad to clear that up for you ;)
I have the same situation, can you help me?
@@tomatordia8448 Follow all the instruction Jeremy gave you in the video, you can't be wrong. You are mistaking something, the first time can happen!
After 1 hour of debugging, I found, i put 201, instead of 2001. It's time to sleep now. Goodnight.
Thanks, buddy. What is the cause of this? Thanks to you, i've spent only couple of minutes
Thank you Sir 🙏🙏🙏
Thanks for watching :)
My pings simply do not work. I re did the entire lab for about 6-7 times trying to figure out what's wrong. In the end I finally decided I will do everything exactly as you did in the video and follow along, but still my pings are failing by "request timed out". I spent hours trying to do the lab, but guess I'll just move on considering it has to be a packet tracer bug..
note: I am able to ping both the default gateway
Thank you very much !!!
Thanks for watching :)
Is anyone else have this lab broken for them? Double checked the configs three times and IpV6 pings not coming in. Ipv4 is working alight
Edit nevermind. I think it was because of not Issuing the ipv6 unicast-routing on R2. I will go to sleep now
Hi Jeremy, long time no see :)
first, thank you for this informative video.
second, on minute 16:45, the int range command is available only on switches not on routers.
Long time no see!
It's available on some routers (the ones I use when making my lecture videos). Depends on the model or version I guess.
@@JeremysITLab
Yeah, I was busy preparing for my CCNP Security exam that's why I wasn't able to watch some of your more recent videos (which I enjoy a lot :) ).
You are right, I tried it on 2811 and 2911 routers on packet tracer and also on IOSv router on gns3 and the command syntax does exist. Funny, I am almost sure I tried it before somewhere and it didn't work. Maybe it was also on Boson NetSIM :)
I hate Jeremy's IT Lab so much because he does such a great job that I don't get to hear his voice anymore unless I do the CCNP.
You you still doing this course? I’ve finished it a while back but haven’t taken the exam yet as I’ve had no money. I’m down to review with you and possibly answer any questions but I doubt you’ll have any with how good the instruction is!
@@0wad im literally doing the exam in an hour lmao
@@moocows111111 good luck let me know how it goes!
@@0wad i passed :)
@@moocows111111 LETS GO! Would you mind sharing what resources you used and how long you’ve studied for? How difficult was the exam?
Not sure why. I have no errors with any of the other labs, but when opening this one I am told it's not compatible with this version of Packet Tracer, running version 8.0.1.0064.
Following along by video, and greatly appreciate all of your content.
Hi sir, can we get your ppt you are referring, so that we can take a print of that and study simultaneously? It would make the things more easier to refer the past topics covered by you.
Sorry, I don't offer the slides.
Yaayy!! ❤️🛰️
Thanks for watching :)
tysm
Hi Jeremy, about the link-local addresses, when do you usually need to manually configure link-local addresses? From a udemy tutorial, I know that you configure it when the auto-generated addresses are complicated.
You never 'need' to configure the manually unless two devices have the same MAC address and therefore generate the same link-local address (which shouldn't happen). You can configure them if you want to make them something simpler like FE80::1, FE80::2, etc
I might be mistaken, but it appears that cisco ios doesnt allow the use of interface range when it comes to serial connections. Correct me if i'm wrong.
Try it!
Couple of things that threwme off here. as always I tried completing the lab without watching the video.
when I got the error message when setting the ipv6 route command I then re did the command only using the interface as the next hop on both routers, that didnt work. watched the video re entered the command and pings were only getting through 75% of the time. I forgot to no commanad my original routes.
I am sure I will learn in the next video I am guessing it didnt work as we are using link-local addresses on the ppp network and not unique local addresses.
In boson Exim CCNA 200-301 practice exam how many attempts I can take practice exam and how long I get access to boson Exim
Unlimited!
oh god it was just a space (g 0/0 instead of g0/0)
I do not know why, but when I am trying to open this lab file I get an error - "The file .... is not compatible with this version of Packet Tracer."
Other files works fine. The version of Packet Tracer is 8.0.0.0212. Thank you in advance for your help!
Hey Jeremy, so I don't know if an update to Packet Tracer might have changed things, but when trying to configure the static routes I keep getting this.
R2(config)#ipv6 route 2001:db8::/64 g0/0 FE80::230:F2FF:FE36:4501
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
It's indicating that the interface is an invalid input, but if I don't put it there it says that I need to include the interface like so.
R2(config)#ipv6 route 2001:db8::/64 FE80::230:F2FF:FE36:4501
% Interface has to be specified for a link-local nexthop
Any idea what might be causing this? I enabled ipv6 unicast-routing on both routers as well. Thanks for any feedback!
Try putting a space between the g and the 0
@@robertfisher7701 THanks! That worked.
@@robertfisher7701 Thanks bro!
@@robertfisher7701 i love you
Sir, Please try to put two videos per week
I don't have enough time to make two videos per week.
Hey Jeremy thanks for yet another amazing video. I have a couple of questions: why is ipv6 enable command unavailable in Boson unlike in packet tracer and how is that command different from ipv6 unicast routing? Also in Boson I’m getting a non-12-hex value for MAC address on interfaces for the same lab, it’s showing something else when I run show ipv6 interfaces brief. Thank you for your time and lectures which are gold.
Hi John, if you have technical questions about Boson NetSim I recommend asking Boson. In NetSim you can go to Help > Support > Submit Support Ticket, or go here: www.boson.com/contact-us
The Lab file isn't working for me, stating that it is not compatible with my current version of packet tracer :(
Q: For the static route from R1 to PC2. Both has g0/0 and i am confuse which one you are referring to . Is it:
#R1:ipv6 route [x.x.x.x/64, R1 INT PORT ,FE80] OR
#R1:ipv6 route [x.x.x.x/64, R2 INT PORT, FE80].
Please help
It 's R1 outgoing interface.
Hello is this video the entire end of the course?
Nope, many more videos to come.
i downloaded your lab but cant find this lab in the list
When configuring the routers G0/1 interfaces ipv6 address, why didn't you specify the ipv6 address as ::1 as indicated on the topology? Or have I missed something here?
The instructions say to use EUI-64
Hello Jeremy the PT Lab is not available on your drive so can't download it :(
Thank you anyways!
Sorry, I fixed it!
@@JeremysITLab awesome! thank you Jeremy ! 💯
👍👍👍
What was your first job?
In IT? Network engineer, my current job.
@@JeremysITLab what about in general? I just finished college, and job hunting sucks 😂
how to ping pc's with out static routing configuration?
You could use dynamic routing protocols like OSPF.
hmm, after completing this LAB my ping stats are only %50 from either PC. Seems like every other time I send it, the Routers forget the link-local addresses and need to initiate NDP again which drops the frame. Any ideas?
not sure what it was, I restarted and ran all the commands again. Now I get %100
Hi Jeremy, if multiple nodes have IPv6 addresses with identical last 6 hex digits within a network, will they have identical solicited-node multicast address? Won't it cause problem for NDR within the network?
DAD (duplicate address detection, I mention it in Day 33), which is also sent to the solicited-node multicast address, should detect any problems like that beforehand
@@JeremysITLab Sorry I did not ask clearly. I meant when interface ids are different while the last 6 hex digits are same. They are not duplicate IP but will have same last 6 hex digits.
My apology that I posted this question on the wrong session. I meant to post it on day 33 but my mistake.
i can't understand why i have thos error message this is my conf :
R1(config)#ipv6 route 2001:db8:0:1::/64 g0/0 FE80::201:63FF:FEB0:B801
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Great lecture 👍
Hi Jeremy, instead of using the link-local as the next hop, i configured the static route just using the exit interface.
On R1: ipv6 route 2001:DB8:0:1::/64 GigabitEthernet0/0
On R2: ipv6 route 2001:DB8::/64 GigabitEthernet0/0
This does not work. Am I doing anything wrong?
Both PC1 and PC2 are able to ping the default gateway without any issues?
I had the same issue. I also typed his ipv6 route command word for word including the g0/0 interface before the next-hop address and it didn't recognize it as a command for some reason.
@@Dennis-n6u He explains it in the next lecture, i believe. IPv6 static routes have to be configured fully specificied. Please confirm though. It's been a while since I have thought about IPv6.
I was beating my head over an hour to figure out on myself how to configure an ipv6 static route :D Thanks Jeremy
Hi and thank you for a great course! Planning on taking the exam during this month.
I tried configuring the static routes with interfaces instead of link-local address, but didn't work for me. Packet Tracer issue?
Good luck on the exam!
In IPv6, you can't specify only the interface, you'll need to specify the next-hop IP also (or specify just the next-hop IP). I mention this in the next video, Day 33 (IPv6 part 3).
Jeremy, When u configured the static route on R1 you specified g0/0 before the link local next hop address. Is that the R1s g0/0 interface or R2s g0/0 interface ?
It's the exit interface, the interface that the packet will be sent out of ;)
@@JeremysITLab Got it, thanks... much love ❤
Channel failed to load is our hero
If i enter eui 64 command without entering the command ipv6 unicast-routing and i enter it later,do the configuration still valid? Does the ping will work?
Try it in the lab! :)
@@JeremysITLab Ok, 1-I first did all configurations but didn't enter the ipv6 unicast-routing command and tried to ping from pc1 to pc2 and i had no reply.
2-Then i entered just the command ipv6 unicast-r and tried again and i had a reply from the default gateway of pc2 (R2 g0/1) : ''destination host unreachable''.
3- so i re-entered eui-64 command on g0/1 R1-R2 interfaces and tried to ping on more time and this time, finally, worked!
but why did i receive answer from the default gateway on the second attempt?..thanks so much!
@@youssefsalama663 It might just be packet tracer behaving strangely, I'm not sure! I can't think of a clear reason why it would be like that
I have the same issue