Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, TikTok and Twitter, etc... (Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public 😅). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve future contents. A big thank you from all of us.
The easiest way to understand QM is by thinking of PC game analogy. Wave function as equal to rendering algorithm compiles into game code. It consist of many option & outcome directly embedded in it. The option will only materialize, either into pixel, image on screen or even different storyline, once the player come and make a decision to go that way. Otherwise, it will keep as a code. Yes, we live in the matrix
Ah so pretty much like as if we all live and are the mcs of our own storyline rpg or whatever and based on our choices that’s what life will take us to? but if we don’t make certain choices they end up as ideas ?
Unfortunately this video doesn’t explain much on an already extremely complex subject, the images we also see have nothing to do with the script at times. I don’t mean to discourage you, I know the work it takes. Hope to watch better videos from you. Good luck
This is a topic I love very much. I wish to study it one day! You're explanation is very good! One little detail I like to add is. That physicists at the beginning of the 20th century thought we almost knew it all. They where very wrong with that conclusion.
You describe light particle-like action as tennis ball is fine for me, but marking it landing spot is easily confusing, people may assume scientists have to mark the landing spot of single photon, leads to the full capability of tracing light motion
None of these analogies are correct. We teach the correct facts in high school when we define "Photons are small amounts of energy.". Nobody seems to be paying any attention to what we are teaching in high school, though. ;-)
I'm a freshman in highschool and I bet my friend I can understand anything so if I can write a 5 page essay on quantum mechanics he would pay my 50 dollars
Great video…thanks for sharing! Perhaps I am an oddity but I never really understood why folks think the macro world is so different than the quantum. I agree that our physical interpretation of wave/particle duality and such is a bit unique. However the macroscopic world seems every bit as probabilistic as the quantum. This is why almost everything in the world can be wagered on in casinos, why different “risks” are associated with investments, and why weather reports always designate a probability to the predictions. I dare say we wouldn’t even understand the report if it didn’t come with a probability. Frankly the chance that a person will even make it home from work seems morbidly probabilistic. Hopefully a high probability…but would be remiss to not acknowledge there are in fact a lot of ways to die…or get sidetracked. Lol
I agree with you... Light may do seemingly crazy things on a subatomic level, but on a macro level, WHERE WE ALL LIVE, light always does the same thing... Illuminate or not... Travel at 186,000 miles per second or is not visibly present, etc...
Okay so this is what I’ve understood: Particles behave differently when observed. When not observed they behave like balls, when observed they behave like waves, what could this mean? Since everything is made from particles, everything we see, could behave differently when we are not observing it, for rxample, If I left a hairbrush on my table and left rhe room, whats to say it’s behavior could not change? For example it could be another color, it could take another shape etc. Idk how close to understanding this is but this is what I’ve caught from doing some researxh on the topic lol
There are no particles in nature. There are only quanta of energy. Quanta always behave like small amounts of energy. The problem here is not physics. The problem here is your mind which can't let go of the stupid "particle" meme.
1801-ൽ തോമസ് യങ് നടത്തിയ ഏറ്റവും ലളിതമായ ഡബിൾ സ്ലിറ്റ് പരീക്ഷണം മുതൽ ജോൺ വീലറുടെ ഡിലേഡ് ചോയ്‌സ് ക്വാണ്ടം ഇറേസർ പരീക്ഷണം വരെയും തുടർന്ന് നോബൽ സമ്മാന ജേതാക്കളായ അലൈൻ ആസ്പെക്‌ട്, ജോൺ ക്ലോസർ, ആന്റൺ സെല്ലിംഗർ എന്നിവരുടെയും അത്യാധുനിക പരീക്ഷണങ്ങൾ വരെ മനുഷ്യരാശിക്ക് ക്വാണ്ടം മെക്കാനിക്‌സ് എന്ന നിഗൂഢ വിചിത്രമായ പ്രതിഭാസത്തിന്റെ കാര്യകാരണത്വം നൽകാൻ ഇതുവരെ കഴിഞ്ഞിട്ടില്ല. നിങ്ങൾ അത് കൂടുതൽ കൂടുതൽ അന്വേഷിക്കുന്തോറും അത് കൂടുതൽ കൂടുതൽ നിഗൂഢതകൾ നിറഞ്ഞിരിക്കുന്ന നിഗൂഢതകളാണെന്ന് നിങ്ങൾ കണ്ടെത്തും. നിഗൂഢതകൾക്ക് മേൽ നിഗൂഢതകൾ കുന്നുകൂടിയതുപോലെ... 😭
How many lives will quantum scientist risk Nd kill creating a falsecearthvand a fake god with human microchip implants before you all abort using a falsecsince of reality
Why only show pictures of Einstein, when he isn't even known for any contribution to quantum physics? Why not Planck, Schrödinger, Heisenberg, Pauli, etc?
@@augustd8492 There is no paradox in the EPR paper. Einstein's main contribution to quantum mechanics was the explanation of the photoelectric effect, for which he got the Nobel prize. The EPR paper is mostly a scientific curiosity as three relativists failed to notice that the structure of quantum mechanics is caused by... drum roll... relativity. ;-)
No, it's not. Quantum mechanics is the theory of microscopic energy transfer. In the lab it's the behavior of systems that make "click...click.click....click" like a Geiger-Mueller counter. Mathematically quantum mechanics is simply a multi-dimensional partition of unity. That partition just happens to have amazingly complex properties that one would not expect intuitively. At least I would not.
About the double slit experiment as performed within the three dimensional space of a laboratory: For the pinhole, circular, slit, and otherwise shaped, either single, double or multiple, I have not yet seen the corresponding Hamiltonian energy operators with their eigenvalues and eigenfunctions calculated. It is not clear then how quantum mechanics “predicts” the outcomes. Think of guessing the eigenfunctions of the hydrogen atom just by goodwill. The lobes, symmetries, sizes and other traits of the eigenfunctions, could be guessed? In fact for the hydrogen atom the Schrödinger self adjoint energy operator H is the mathematical ingredient of Quantum Wave Mechanics that actually works. The Schrödinger time dependent equation (STDE) is postulated as the quantum law of movement for wave functions. But the STDE is completely wrong. The STDE is so useless in predicting the actual behavior of physical electrons that special “quantum axioms” had to be postulated, namely: 1.- preference for eigenstates; and 2.- sudden, causeless jumps of an intrinsically random nature; followed by 2.- the uncertainty principle; topped by 4.- the probabilistic interpretation of wave functions. These four axioms become unnecessary if and when the correct law of movement is used. Thus, dismiss the STDE and use instead an appropriate Hamiltonian non-linear quadratic deterministic time dependent equation (DTDE). The DTDE simultaneously establishes the law of movement for both the bound electron and the bound photon. To encompass photon absorption and emission adequately enlarge the non-linear system to account for deterministic interactions with free photons. Daniel Crespin
Wave functions don't have a straightforward opposing linear relationship with mass. Instead, they describe the probability distribution of a particle's position and momentum, influenced by the particle's mass, but not in a directly opposing linear way.
Why do you have to confuse the issue of QM by talking about the "color" of cats? What can't you just talk about momentum/angular momentum/position states that a particle can occupy? At last that way, somebody might get the impression that quantum states have to do with the building blocks of "laws of motion". Why are you confusing people with the color of cats? Do you think people are just confused?
Quantum mechanics explains the behavior of quantum particles. -- Cause and effect. Cause and effect is omnipresent in our everyday lives, as well as in quantum mechanics. And if in modern philosophy this concept (cause and effect) causes controversy, then this is due to a misunderstanding of the essence of quantum mechanics. ---- ''If you are not completely confused by quantum mechanics, you do not understand it'' / John Wheeler / ''Quantum mechanics makes absolutely no sense'' /Roger Penrose/ "Nobody understands quantum mechanics and that's a problem". /Sean Carroll/ ----- It is quite possibly that "cause and effect" in quantum physics is subject to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle -------.
It’s not hypocrisy at all - scientific experiment has verified quantum mechanics to a high degree of accuracy over 100+ years. There have been zero scientific experiments that have verified any supernatural phenomena or ability, to any degree of accuracy for as long as the scientific method has been in use. Many scientific experiments have been agreed upon between those that claim to possess supernatural abilities, and scientists - to allow the claimant to demonstrate their supposed abilities in a controlled environment which all participants agree upon beforehand - and every single one of those has failed to demonstrate the supernatural - for example that so-called ‘psychics’ do any better than ‘non-psychics’ (i.e. by chance alone) at predicting future events. Now, this isn’t to say that these kinds of things definitely do not exist - but the burden of proof for any claim is on the person making the claim (i.e. the psychic) to demonstrate their claim is true. The default position for any proposition is to withhold belief until the claim has been sufficiently proven, and the more extraordinary the claim, the more extraordinary the evidence needs to be to support that claim. (E.g. If I told you that I had a red Ford in my garage, you might accept that with no further evidence - as the claim is not extraordinary; People have cars, many are Fords, many cars are red, many people have garages, many people store their cars in their garages. However, if you did require further evidence, when we could devise some scientific experiments to increase the likelihood that my claim is true - such as observing the contents of my garage. But, if I said I had a red Ford in my garage that ran on water alone, and could fly - then you’d require substantially more evidence of that - as that’s an extraordinary claim.) If you are genuinely interested in the experiments that have been devised and conducted to test supernatural claims, James Randi did a series of experiments, with people who claimed all sorts of supernatural abilities, and offered $1,000,000 to anyone who could demonstrate any supernatural abilities of any kind, in any experiment that both parties agreed was fair. Between 1964 and 2015, there were over 1,000 people that took up this wager, and not one of them was successful. Many of these tests are on RUclips, if you search for James Randi you’ll be able to find them. If any of these abilities do turn out to be true, and sufficient evidence is presented and corroborated, through the scientific method, then the scientific community would of course change their ‘beliefs’ - but until such time, we can ignore these as nonsense.
Do not taking into equation the rotation of the Earth the rotation in which it is falling through space I think they know what's up with the pretend not to know
What do Quantum Mechanics and Religion have in common? They are both based on faith that YOU as a person can see but others around you cannot...Unless experienced by them.
Waveform particles/photons are a mathematical construct why are you showing particles, that travel straight, as waves? Delete this video, it is not educating people in Quantum Physics.
Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, TikTok and Twitter, etc... (Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public 😅). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve future contents. A big thank you from all of us.
The easiest way to understand QM is by thinking of PC game analogy.
Wave function as equal to rendering algorithm compiles into game code. It consist of many option & outcome directly embedded in it. The option will only materialize, either into pixel, image on screen or even different storyline, once the player come and make a decision to go that way. Otherwise, it will keep as a code.
Yes, we live in the matrix
Ah so pretty much like as if we all live and are the mcs of our own storyline rpg or whatever and based on our choices that’s what life will take us to? but if we don’t make certain choices they end up as ideas ?
@@aaronbreton662you should read a book called The Travelers Gift. Your last line made me think of it.
Krishna said our birth and destiny is already written and fixed but we ourselves have the control over making choices … something like your comment
Unfortunately this video doesn’t explain much on an already extremely complex subject, the images we also see have nothing to do with the script at times. I don’t mean to discourage you, I know the work it takes. Hope to watch better videos from you. Good luck
⁰⁰⁰d /
It is a bunch of BS. It starts with a "simple" equation and goes downhill from there.
@@noahway13so its bs because it's to complex for you to understand
I think so .. just spending my expensive time..... 😢😢
He didn't even clearly say the principle portion of it.
At 3.42 : "Physicians" ??!! Do you mean "Physicists" perhaps ?
Thanks Insane Curiosity.I'll be learning about Quantum Mechanics at 11 years old.
Bro from 37k (that's when I subbed) to now 246k, what a progression u have made. I am very proud of you. Banger of a video 👍👍
This is a topic I love very much. I wish to study it one day! You're explanation is very good!
One little detail I like to add is. That physicists at the beginning of the 20th century thought we almost knew it all. They where very wrong with that conclusion.
✔ 😉
Learning quantum mechanics is adventurous
Why not start by the definition of quantum mechanics instead of starting equations.
You describe light particle-like action as tennis ball is fine for me, but marking it landing spot is easily confusing, people may assume scientists have to mark the landing spot of single photon, leads to the full capability of tracing light motion
None of these analogies are correct. We teach the correct facts in high school when we define "Photons are small amounts of energy.". Nobody seems to be paying any attention to what we are teaching in high school, though. ;-)
I'm a freshman in highschool and I bet my friend I can understand anything so if I can write a 5 page essay on quantum mechanics he would pay my 50 dollars
#teamfiend
Interesting subject matter that I don’t fully understand, but I love the sciences and your channel 👍.
Okay Mr Curiosity l think you're just showing off now! 🤩
Great video…thanks for sharing!
Perhaps I am an oddity but I never really understood why folks think the macro world is so different than the quantum. I agree that our physical interpretation of wave/particle duality and such is a bit unique. However the macroscopic world seems every bit as probabilistic as the quantum. This is why almost everything in the world can be wagered on in casinos, why different “risks” are associated with investments, and why weather reports always designate a probability to the predictions. I dare say we wouldn’t even understand the report if it didn’t come with a probability.
Frankly the chance that a person will even make it home from work seems morbidly probabilistic. Hopefully a high probability…but would be remiss to not acknowledge there are in fact a lot of ways to die…or get sidetracked. Lol
I agree with you... Light may do seemingly crazy things on a subatomic level, but on a macro level, WHERE WE ALL LIVE, light always does the same thing... Illuminate or not... Travel at 186,000 miles per second or is not visibly present, etc...
Okay so this is what I’ve understood: Particles behave differently when observed. When not observed they behave like balls, when observed they behave like waves, what could this mean? Since everything is made from particles, everything we see, could behave differently when we are not observing it, for rxample, If I left a hairbrush on my table and left rhe room, whats to say it’s behavior could not change? For example it could be another color, it could take another shape etc. Idk how close to understanding this is but this is what I’ve caught from doing some researxh on the topic lol
This is the law of quantum entanglement . Not quantum physics in whole just a part of it
There are no particles in nature. There are only quanta of energy. Quanta always behave like small amounts of energy. The problem here is not physics. The problem here is your mind which can't let go of the stupid "particle" meme.
Thanks alot. I learned physics only in o level but i really love physics
1801-ൽ തോമസ് യങ് നടത്തിയ ഏറ്റവും ലളിതമായ ഡബിൾ സ്ലിറ്റ് പരീക്ഷണം മുതൽ ജോൺ വീലറുടെ ഡിലേഡ് ചോയ്‌സ് ക്വാണ്ടം ഇറേസർ പരീക്ഷണം വരെയും തുടർന്ന് നോബൽ സമ്മാന ജേതാക്കളായ അലൈൻ ആസ്പെക്‌ട്, ജോൺ ക്ലോസർ, ആന്റൺ സെല്ലിംഗർ എന്നിവരുടെയും അത്യാധുനിക പരീക്ഷണങ്ങൾ വരെ മനുഷ്യരാശിക്ക് ക്വാണ്ടം മെക്കാനിക്‌സ് എന്ന നിഗൂഢ വിചിത്രമായ പ്രതിഭാസത്തിന്റെ കാര്യകാരണത്വം നൽകാൻ ഇതുവരെ കഴിഞ്ഞിട്ടില്ല.
നിങ്ങൾ അത് കൂടുതൽ കൂടുതൽ അന്വേഷിക്കുന്തോറും അത് കൂടുതൽ കൂടുതൽ നിഗൂഢതകൾ നിറഞ്ഞിരിക്കുന്ന നിഗൂഢതകളാണെന്ന് നിങ്ങൾ കണ്ടെത്തും.
നിഗൂഢതകൾക്ക് മേൽ നിഗൂഢതകൾ കുന്നുകൂടിയതുപോലെ... 😭
Doing great, never give up
Excellent enjoyed ❤
Thanks ...
(What about "EVOLUTION OF COSMIC INTELLIGENCE " do you have video explaining in. Simple terms?)
Quantum Mechanics is still confusing to me but that's the same with bitcoin. Qh woe is me. 🙃
How many lives will quantum scientist risk Nd kill creating a falsecearthvand a fake god with human microchip implants before you all abort using a falsecsince of reality
Why only show pictures of Einstein, when he isn't even known for any contribution to quantum physics? Why not Planck, Schrödinger, Heisenberg, Pauli, etc?
He funnily forgets to say who introduced quantum mechanics. He mentions Schrödinger. But not Planck.
Great video!! Thank you!!
@3:41 - physicians lol ... and gynecologists study the black holes
Where are the visuals from at 6:16?
Nice explanation ❤, I did something quite different, in my video I start from the origin of Quantum Physics and why it was called Quantum.
Too many ads
What has Einstein to do with quantum mechanics???
A lot.
Oh yes, the 'famous' ERP paradox. @@rossminzy
@@augustd8492 There is no paradox in the EPR paper. Einstein's main contribution to quantum mechanics was the explanation of the photoelectric effect, for which he got the Nobel prize. The EPR paper is mostly a scientific curiosity as three relativists failed to notice that the structure of quantum mechanics is caused by... drum roll... relativity. ;-)
Not the narrator calling physicists “physicians” 💀
This is a great video! Can I use part of the video on my RUclips channel?
hey, thanks for the feedback.The only way we allow to use our material is through a one time fee.
You can email us for this :)
I'm wondering whether its from continuous sampling of probability distribution population that we get the final conclusion?
Oppenheimer?
it might be easy to explain what quantam physics is. But mentally grasping it at a fundamental level is impossible
No, it's not. Quantum mechanics is the theory of microscopic energy transfer. In the lab it's the behavior of systems that make "click...click.click....click" like a Geiger-Mueller counter. Mathematically quantum mechanics is simply a multi-dimensional partition of unity. That partition just happens to have amazingly complex properties that one would not expect intuitively. At least I would not.
While listening to the first part of the video i thought I was listening to William James sir pragmatism
I love quantum mechanics
I love quanntum mechanics
My 9th class brain is getting fried but ts is good
Physicians?
General Relativity is incompatible with Quantum Mechanics
That's an often repeated myth. There must be a quarter million theory papers on quantum mechanics on curved manifolds. ;-)
It's really simple.......😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
These physicians know a lot
John 14:21
About the double slit experiment as performed within the three dimensional space of a laboratory:
For the pinhole, circular, slit, and otherwise shaped, either single, double or multiple, I have not yet seen the corresponding Hamiltonian energy operators with their eigenvalues and eigenfunctions calculated.
It is not clear then how quantum mechanics “predicts” the outcomes.
Think of guessing the eigenfunctions of the hydrogen atom just by goodwill. The lobes, symmetries, sizes and other traits of the eigenfunctions, could be guessed?
In fact for the hydrogen atom the Schrödinger self adjoint energy operator H is the mathematical ingredient of Quantum Wave Mechanics that actually works.
The Schrödinger time dependent equation (STDE) is postulated as the quantum law of movement for wave functions. But the STDE is completely wrong.
The STDE is so useless in predicting the actual behavior of physical electrons that special “quantum axioms” had to be postulated, namely:
1.- preference for eigenstates; and
2.- sudden, causeless jumps of an intrinsically random nature; followed by
2.- the uncertainty principle; topped by
4.- the probabilistic interpretation of wave functions.
These four axioms become unnecessary if and when the correct law of movement is used.
Thus, dismiss the STDE and use instead an appropriate Hamiltonian non-linear quadratic deterministic time dependent equation (DTDE).
The DTDE simultaneously establishes the law of movement for both the bound electron and the bound photon.
To encompass photon absorption and emission adequately enlarge the non-linear system to account for deterministic interactions with free photons.
Daniel Crespin
I like quantum mechanics.👍
What are the basis in creating the operators/algorithm? Isnt like how the machine learning works? Just curious noob questions.. 😊
The basis are physical observations. :-)
Nah, ent got a sleepy voice
The best education is quntam therory
8:03 Оглянись. Восем рублей!
I was good until you introduced the cat theory thing.
Love this channel
❤
What are you talking about , a wave function has an equal and opposing linear relationship proportional to its mass🚬💻
Wave functions don't have a straightforward opposing linear relationship with mass. Instead, they describe the probability distribution of a particle's position and momentum, influenced by the particle's mass, but not in a directly opposing linear way.
these all are described in our indian vedas
Why do you have to confuse the issue of QM by talking about the "color" of cats? What can't you just talk about momentum/angular momentum/position states that a particle can occupy? At last that way, somebody might get the impression that quantum states have to do with the building blocks of "laws of motion".
Why are you confusing people with the color of cats? Do you think people are just confused?
Simple equation?...lol
👍
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
@@InsaneCuriosity You’re welcome :)
3:42 Physicists, not "physicians." Do some proof-reading of your scripts.
Very big things are made from very small things and that is the problem....!😅
..
3
...aaaaand it's STILL clear as mud. 😬
me at 10th class seeing quatum mechanics XD
good vedio
Is it just me or does the narrator sounds like AI.
Quantum mechanics explains the behavior of quantum particles.
--
Cause and effect.
Cause and effect is omnipresent in our everyday lives, as well as in quantum mechanics.
And if in modern philosophy this concept (cause and effect) causes controversy,
then this is due to a misunderstanding of the essence of quantum mechanics.
----
''If you are not completely confused by quantum mechanics, you do not understand it''
/ John Wheeler /
''Quantum mechanics makes absolutely no sense'' /Roger Penrose/
"Nobody understands quantum mechanics and that's a problem". /Sean Carroll/
-----
It is quite possibly that "cause and effect" in quantum physics is subject to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
-------.
Bizarre that scientists believe in quantum mechanics but deny physic abilities, astrology, tarot etc. Hypocrisy.
It’s not hypocrisy at all - scientific experiment has verified quantum mechanics to a high degree of accuracy over 100+ years.
There have been zero scientific experiments that have verified any supernatural phenomena or ability, to any degree of accuracy for as long as the scientific method has been in use.
Many scientific experiments have been agreed upon between those that claim to possess supernatural abilities, and scientists - to allow the claimant to demonstrate their supposed abilities in a controlled environment which all participants agree upon beforehand - and every single one of those has failed to demonstrate the supernatural - for example that so-called ‘psychics’ do any better than ‘non-psychics’ (i.e. by chance alone) at predicting future events.
Now, this isn’t to say that these kinds of things definitely do not exist - but the burden of proof for any claim is on the person making the claim (i.e. the psychic) to demonstrate their claim is true.
The default position for any proposition is to withhold belief until the claim has been sufficiently proven, and the more extraordinary the claim, the more extraordinary the evidence needs to be to support that claim.
(E.g. If I told you that I had a red Ford in my garage, you might accept that with no further evidence - as the claim is not extraordinary; People have cars, many are Fords, many cars are red, many people have garages, many people store their cars in their garages. However, if you did require further evidence, when we could devise some scientific experiments to increase the likelihood that my claim is true - such as observing the contents of my garage.
But, if I said I had a red Ford in my garage that ran on water alone, and could fly - then you’d require substantially more evidence of that - as that’s an extraordinary claim.)
If you are genuinely interested in the experiments that have been devised and conducted to test supernatural claims, James Randi did a series of experiments, with people who claimed all sorts of supernatural abilities, and offered $1,000,000 to anyone who could demonstrate any supernatural abilities of any kind, in any experiment that both parties agreed was fair.
Between 1964 and 2015, there were over 1,000 people that took up this wager, and not one of them was successful.
Many of these tests are on RUclips, if you search for James Randi you’ll be able to find them.
If any of these abilities do turn out to be true, and sufficient evidence is presented and corroborated, through the scientific method, then the scientific community would of course change their ‘beliefs’ - but until such time, we can ignore these as nonsense.
the cat didnt die cant of been schrodingers
Do not taking into equation the rotation of the Earth the rotation in which it is falling through space I think they know what's up with the pretend not to know
What do Quantum Mechanics and Religion have in common? They are both based on faith that YOU as a person can see but others around you cannot...Unless experienced by them.
Quantum Mechanics help solve
some LGBTQ reform by making
earth more accepting to prob-
able alternatives & variations
of human relationship pacts
Waveform particles/photons are a mathematical construct why are you showing particles, that travel straight, as waves? Delete this video, it is not educating people in Quantum Physics.
@8:48 similar to the electoral college. Fractals
7 16
Hi pran
Hi
What?
Cool 😎
Great video !
the equalization of your voice/microphone is horrendous, unlistenable, its piercing and hurts to hear. lmk if you want me to remaster it for you...
❤
Thanks for watching!
Salve come va
Bad and confusing explanation.
Космос наш
Wtf did I just waste my time watching 🤦♂️
"Physicians" 😂
👎🏼
waste of time
Sorry but u can't explain QM easily!!
Hello