Chainlink LINK Vs Quant Network QNT
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- Welcome back ! Today we will be looking at chainlink LINK and Quant network side by side. Both of these crypto project are trying to corelate and make the crypto space easy to use by offering interoperatbility solutions that spam the entire blockchain ecosystem
Join the Patreon and get exclusive access to our private Discord community which includes:
- Weekly Meetings With Me
- My Portfolio
- Altcoin Watch List
- Early Access To Interviews And Videos
- Courses
THE PATREON LINK ------- patreon.com/Al... !!!!
My Twitter - / realallincrypto
Our Cardano Stake Pool Name: ALLIN
PLEASE LIKE COMMENT AND SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE CONTENT
THANKS FOR WATCHING
DISCLAIMER: I am not a financial adviser and this video is not financial advise this video is here for entertainment and educational use only
#quant #qnt #chainlink #link #bitcoin #btc #crypto #altcoins
Quality wise both are outstanding and I have a bag of each but QNT because of it's supply and lower market cap will give you more bang for the buck in my humble opinion.
bitconnect was too as they said
@@kdjsgkhjhmrzazhguROFL not even, bit connect was a legit scam from day 1 that shit only attracted morons who couldn’t do actual research.
For you to sit there and try to even remotely compare quant to bit connect is hysterical.
Quant Network holds patents, started ISO/TC307 blockchain & DLT standards and is part of IETF building the Secure Asset Transfer Protocol SATP together with, a.o., MIT. Quant Network is not trying but has solved interoperability amongst other practical functions. Quant was in the BIS Rosalind Project, results published in 2023, DYOR. Quant Network partners include Oracle. Lightyears ahead ... forget the rest.
bitconnect was too as they said
@@kdjsgkhjhmrzazhgu We have a parrott.🦜
@@kdjsgkhjhmrzazhguComparing bitconnect to Quant. Good one 👎
Keep telling yourself that while everyone else gets rich. QNT bulls are some of the very few that are losing money during a bull run lol
I hold both. My bigest bag is QNT
smart
bitconnect was too as they said
I like QNT more. But LINK is good as well.
biiiiiiiitconnect
Link is used to make quick gains the cash out to buy qnt lol chain link is a joke
@@samjames2388 quant said they will be at sibos this year ? where they where ? making jokes about fake projects ? or stupid people ?
@@samjames2388keep telling yourself that while link holders make money and QNT holders continue losing money
Quant all day everyday .. tokenomics it matters … and Gilbert verdian , don’t need to say anymore !!!!
No brainer investment!
bitconnect was too as they said
@@kdjsgkhjhmrzazhguautism?
Keep telling yourself that while everyone but you gets rich.
We're well into the bull run and QNT has gone nowhere and QNT will continue going nowhere as long as so little adoption is achieved. To be this far into a bull run only for QNT to have gone nowhere is a perfect example of why tokenomics don't mean anything without adoption.
I hold large bags of both of these amazing projects
How big is large?
@@b-rad3013it's bigly.. a HUGH!! large.
In the future a bag of 5 qnt will be qualified as big.
bitconnect was too as they said
Quant!
After 3 months of studying and analysing different data and insights based on Investment as well as finance foundations. Quant has the strongest probability to become the largest cap. Token in the Crypto Markent and fastest growing in compared to the stock market as well
I've got a large bag of QNT. Huge believer. LINK is also amazing TECH, which reminds me to go get some !
bitconnect was too as they said
This is like comparing Windows Server 2030($QNT) and Windows 98($LINK)
It’s a philosophical question. Open source decentralized vs. closed source centralized
bitconnect was too as they said @@arifbaba5482
Its like compare vapor token to vapor token... What is more vapor. Projects yes have value for investors that invested money in project token no its just no real value vapor.
QNT will change lives…DCA each month and wait for the next two years to
swing by🥶🥶👍🏼👍🏼
Quant of course.
They want to stay in the background and just get in with, overledger interoperability to join the whole world.
bitconnect was too as they said
Just follow the big boys (companies). They put their money in brevets as hedera and quant and not in open source projects. So for future, in my opinion, we have to follow them.
bitconnect was too as they said
Quant all day long!
By Tokenomics alone QNT is a far better investment. Let alone the established connections QNT has already developed.
QNT has zero tokenomics. The token doesn't even need to exist. Centralized services are paid for in fiat to a centrtalized entity, Quant. Why is there a token?
bitconnect was too as they said
Low supply doesn't increase ROI. This is a common misconception. A single $100 coin isn't more valuable than ten $10 coins. That's so supply decides. The % increase isn't affected
It's the circulating supply, not low or high supply... It's harder to get dumped on with QNT because circulating supply is closer to total supply. With link, only about half total supply is circulating... which means you can be DUMPED on...@@sterlingcampbell2116
In fact it is.. It's a core supply and demand economic law. Check "shock supply". We talking the moment we see some demand the low supply will pump even further the price cause of the low supply sth won't happen with Link as there is a lot out there in circulation. Still Link is a major important project but from a ROI long term perspective Quant is the one. ✌️
I own a bag of Link but you can’t deny the tokenomics of QNT…
It has literally zero tokenomics. What are you talking about? The token doesn't even need to exist. Quant, the company, is paid fiat behind closed doors to provide centralized services. The transaction can literally end right there.
QNT is used to buy the licences for the Overledger network and also for transaction fees.The price of the licence fee is a fixed price in fiat but this is converted to the current price of QNT and anyone using the overledger network must own QNT. @@Zzodar578
bitconnect was too as they said
@@Zzodar578no
Simply, this competition reminds me of the cable companies touting their cutting edge tech in the 1980's and connecting households and businesses by digging up roads but it was geographically limited, then global satellites became a thing and boom connects every corner of the Globe, imho CCIP is the beast! and pivots ChainLink to another level.
bitconnect was too as they said
@@kdjsgkhjhmrzazhgu you r obsessed by bitconnect man
Why not both?
QNT 🙌
Sold my link for qnt! 🎉
Smart❤
It's NUTS to think that the Blockchain Community will be Dependent on a CLOSED SOURCE, CENTRALIZED, DirectionLess project 🚮
Ouch!!
@soshicryp8978 We here to make money not to marry are bags or worry about whether its centralised or decentralised. We have bitcoin for thaf
BIG mistake. You lost out on HUGE gains!
arguably Quant has bigger projects and partnerships in the works. Also, they both work in the interoperability space however you should take a peek into how they are constructed. Link can’t bridge legacy infrastructure while Quant can. Also, Link’s bridges are exposed and can therefore be hacked more easily while Quant’s bridges are on the Overledger system and protected behind API gateways (better protection). Lastly, Link doesn’t have the capability to create multi blockchain applications while the Overledger system has a concierge program in place to help develop them for you at a cheap price and in record time. Institutional adoption will follow the teams with the most relationships and the teams which offer the most competitive advantages.
In addition, look at the token issuance for LINK, this is a concern. This is one of the reasons why LINKs price was suppressed in the 2021 bull run.
Lol no they don’t. Link has already won.
@orangemanbad LINK has won nothing only proof of concepts. QNT is working with real partners albeit it kept privately. If you really understood the Quant Network you would know LINK is secondary.
Quant ADA and XRP ✅
Tokenomics: Quant wins easily
Security: Chainlink is the safer bet thanks to integration everywhere as an oracle
I think I need both. 😊
Respectfully I disagree. Quant is far more secure for numerous reasons.
Thank
Made more money w quant last bull, but CCIP is bigger and I just don't see governments and banks using overledger to deploy tokens and individual bridges to every single chain when you can just plug in legacy systems and chains into CCIP or even make a fully customized ledger themselves in which they have full control over and just plug it in. It even says on quant's mission that they hope to mainly service businesses. You really think US or Chinese govt is going to use overledger to deploy a cbdcs?
Quant only has 18 million, that's less than bitcoin, gotta have at least 5 IMO
QNT is actually 14.5 million but not to rule out Bitcoin 7 million BTC lost from deaths and lost keys per *Into the Block* bringing BTC to right around 14 million.
@@xiinomadia4923 I stand corrected that's even better 😂😂
Uh, they only have 14.8 million and basically all are in circulation
@@lvericvon Coinmarketcap has 14.88M with a circulating supply of 12.07M so saying all in circulation would be incorrect here but! Coingecko which is a lot more accurate has a Max supply of 14.6M with a circulating supply of 14.5M in this case we both would be kinda of right ✅
@@lvericvon 81% in circulation
This is not a race for the swift but for the resilient.
I often never put my money on a new horse charging out ahead in the beginning full of hope, but in the old veteran racer who always comes from behind and takes the title - You all already counting chips without factoring the biggest horse in the race ain't even got warmed up yet. XRP Interledger Protocol is that one ring to rule them all.
XRP is such an old story. The only ones pushing it are the ones that have been holding old bags for years … better choose wisely. QNT all the way, no questions. Put LINK and QNT chart together and your answer should be very easy!
@@wonderz3217 Spoken like a true bags holder where reason rarely resides. So I will not try to argue with the less inclined as they will only scowl at the wisdom of my words. This was only my observation as I own none of the above. Looking at all three from an outsiders perspective - XRP has the better tech, more skin in the game. Beat the SEC feverishly and has a massive die hard community. Of course you're going to back your bags so I don't expect you to agree here.
Great great topic!!
Chainlink is not a blockchain. Chainlink is a decentralized oracle network that allows smart contracts on various blockchains to securely connect with external data sources, APIs, and payment systems. It acts as a bridge between blockchains and the outside world, ensuring that smart contracts have access to real-world data in a secure and decentralized manner. While Chainlink operates on top of blockchains like Ethereum, it itself is not a blockchain.
bitconnect was too as they said
Neither is Qnt a Blockchain. It's Overledger Interoperability will join everything together. Qnt Link work together.
they work so together that they say it's shit @@Suve35967 , they formqted you to find what you want to hear not reality it's a ponzi noob
Chainlink is winning in this race. I’ll take my chances with LINK
@@BitcoinLiferwhy?
Thanks for this. Really interesting
Quant is Smoke and Mirrors 🌬
does swift affect XRP?
I still can’t figure out what your number one holding is
Cardano ofcourse. He used to make daily video's about it
SO HOLDING BOTH QUANT AND CHAINLINK IS YOUR BEST OPTION, BUT THE "LOVE STORY" BETWEEN "CHAINLINK" AND SWIFT, WILL BE OUT OF THIS WORLD.😂😂😂😂❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉😊😊😊😊 I LOVE "CHAINLINK"... ❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉😊😊😊😂😂😂
❤❤😂😂😂 THEY WILL BOTH DO GREAT, BUT THE "LOVE STORY" IS BETWEEN "CHAINLINK" AND "SWIFT" ❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊😊😊😊😂😂😂😂
Comparing chainlink to qnt is like comparing Michael Jordan to smush Parker
Its like Visa v Mastercard..Both will play a big part in the future ..I like the Quant tokenomics better but Chainlink is a blockchain...I call it a draw with both set for a 20X
New mic?
Are there any blockchains using QNT?
Major blockchains like the top 10-20 but mostly enterprises … haven’t u seen the map?
Does the chainlink guy have any other shirts...probably wears shoes without socks too. 1st impression is key.
Isn't crosschain < what Quant does?
chainlink does better it better with CCIP
$Twoge
People buy quant because they like the logo
People buy Qnt because they're researched the company.
Also will buy qnt because of a low supply.
Qnt🚀
1) you could at least spell Chainlink correctly in the vid, not Chainlin
2) this was an absolute anticlimax, no direct comparisons of pros and cons, or of tokenomics
Disappointing but thanks for the effort
Go somewhere else mate and save us both the time
@@realallincrypto you could've learned from the reply. You could've taken more about sloppy spelling, you could've agreed to include useful tokenomics in future but instead chose to be a dickhead, well done. If you can't take honest criticism on social media you haven't got a chance
three letters B I S
LINK will win because it's already integrated with every project of consequence through price feeds. They already won
I had the same thoughts as I was a link bull last cycle. Bbbbbut why is it always in the toilet? I know now…. That’s why QNT is going to be my 3rd largest bag next to the big 2. I’d even sell my big 2 for QNT when the bull comes back.
It’s about making money so I hold both
CHAINLINK 🚀🚀🚀🚀
Sorry. Not even close
@@lvericvonlol… obviously they haven’t done enough research. They making SWIFT like new news… it’s a year old news which never moved the price….hmmmm I know why!
Injective trumps link & QNT
Injective is a poor investment, the top 5 wallets hold 80% of the supply, dump dump dump.
LINK!
I’m sorry. I have to comment once more. There is nothing even close to a competition here, and actually chainlink can benefit from integrating the overledger. It’s not even close. And actually they don’t compete, except in the minds of the less informed, who don’t realize the truth.
Your welcome to comment as much as you want. The video is a comparison, I would also add that they will compete for market share and one of these project will be more popular then the other in regard to compositing the blockchain space also why would overledger use links ccip??
Quant!
Qnt is king
CCIP dont need Link, Open Ledger Does need Qnt 'Mic Drop'.
ccip uses $link for transaction fees
@@zeiter94 CAN USE!, but other tokens are also allowed unlike Qnt which is either bought with $ and converted to Qnt or use Qnt itself for Sub to OpenLedger"On each source chain, CCIP maintains a cache of destination gas prices, denominated in each feeToken. To prevent staleness, these prices are routinely updated by either piggybacking user messages or timeouts. CCIP supports fee payments in LINK and in alternative assets, which currently includes blockchain-native gas tokens and their ERC20 wrapped versions. The payment model for CCIP is designed to significantly reduce friction for users and quickly scale CCIP to more blockchains by supporting fee payments that originate across a multitude of chains over time."
bitconnect was too as they said
@@zeiter94Everything will run through Qnt. Interoperability. Link has a job too.
this didn't age well lol
Not sure if it's your mic or the software you're using , but you sound a lot clearer 👍
Because you stopped drinking 😂
bitconnect was too as they said
I own both, but QNT is 4x lager than my Link bag. Just look at Market cap & Tokenomics to understand why QNT will outperform LINK, IMO. I do like them both, and they honestly could become long term plays.
U misspelled chainlink in ur preview picture
You misspelled your.
@@m0nkey13 lol
QUANT FOR THE WIN!
Qnt is bigger than Link
QNT 👌
QNT is also 20022 compliant
Chainlink will overpower Qnt
biiiiitconect
Quant has a number of other aces up their sleeves with big financial institutions and their limited 14.8m max supply probably give them a significant edge. I'm sure Link will have other ammo in the bag but QNT will prevail.
I wouldn't worry too much about SWIFT as it's purely a messaging protocol but effectively it will leverage both QNT and Link.
bitconnect was too as they said
LINK is far better
46
I see which way you lean. I think we ought to be more careful to make a distinction between "collaboration" and "partnership." The Bank of England and the BIS has never mentioned Quant as something they intend to use. SWIFT, Bank of America, CITI, etc has explicitly mentioned Chainlink by name and are running tests on its network. That's a big difference. I currently hold more QNT than LINK, but it's close and I'm currently more bullish on LINK.
"Never mentiones" WTF Think you have to do better research both you mentioned QNT partners and their management & directors have talked about using Overledger and collaberate with Quant.
bitconnect was too as they said
bitconnect was too as they said @@QuamfyMarc
Good luck holding Link! It doesn’t hold its price up. Ask me, I was a link bull last bull cycle… it’s F’n frustrating holding that token…I have no patience for that, sorry.
@@wonderz3217 biiiiitconnect
I thought chain link just sent messages information and quant sent the actual value or money am i wrong?
stupid question but does South America not have the ability to transfer funds from person to person?
Chainlink has first to market advantage, although I love the Quant name it is lagging.
Whos uses Netscape these days.?
@@MrNewrossman yes, true. First to market does not always work out, but it is a huge advantage. Is Quants tech leagues ahead? Would Swift put all their work with Linknin the bin and start with Quant? I have no idea to be honest, but balls deep in Link.
@@Deplorable_Me_UK Well best of luck but is swift needed once blockchain transfers fully implement? Kinda same old tech with new 'Hip' wording and still dont need Link to pay fee's for the CCIP to run and with news in next few weeks ye might reconsider, but will let the youtubers do the research as I did and hint WHO needs blockchain passports ? So maybe not Netscape more AOL ;)
bitconnect was too as they said
@@Deplorable_Me_UK Yes. Everything will go through Qnt they have solved interoperability.
Chainlink & Cardano 💙
bitconnect was too as they said
Knew the answer when I seen the comparison 😑
Gimmick coin
Flare….😅😊😊😊
Chainlink
I like both but Chainlink has already been chosen by the WEF and most major banks.
Good luck to u! Do you know who’s above SWIFT, even the WEF? It’s BIS… the central bank of central bank! Why do u think LINK has linked itself with QNT? Because it can’t be complete without QNT… so will other block chains. But ssshhh, I’m still loading!
No Bank of England, Barclays..etc deal with Qnt.
@@Suve35967 Swift, BNY Mellon, DTCC, are Chainlink
The Bank of England does not work with QNT.@@Suve35967
Only Quant because chainlink is not on coinbase
Wrong. Link has always been on CB
Stay away from erc 20 tokens, they are all trash. Only erc 20 is fine are meme coins. Rest won’t ever make top 10
Idiotic comment. And completely untrue.
That's my worry too. ERC-20 and Ethereum is too slow.
So ignorant on what Quant is. They are agnostic and can move to another chain at any time.
Link
Link!
Chainlink is not a blockchain friend
It's not?
Your welcome to delete this comment after looking it up
Then what block is it currently on? Its blockchain agnostic. @@realallincrypto
@@realallincrypto Did you seriously look up whether Chainlink was a blockchain, briefly glance at the Wikipedia's title and assume it was a blockchain? The wiki article itself, in the first line says: 'Chainlink is a decentralized blockchain oracle network built on Ethereum'. The blockchain it's referring to here, is Ethereum... Chainlink offers various services on different blockchains, you even talked about VRF and CCIP in this video? It's like information is going in one ear, not getting processed, and goes out the other!
Also this video itself was ass, no actual comparison as one of the other comments said. No actual research done (as is evident from the blockchain comment). Quant is a literal scam btw, the founder got scammed by a CEX when trying to list the token lmao. The token isn't needed to use Quant's network. You could in theory use dollars simply for payment. Whereas with LINK, one needs to stake the LINK for the network to be secured (you cannot rely on other tokens for your own protocol's security because now you would also be relying on another protocol's security (it's token))
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chainlink_(blockchain)
Neither is Qnt.