I learned this more than twenty years ago, and it still mostly confuses the hell out of me. But if you plug the correct time functions into the convolution formula and follow the rules of integration, you can get the right answer. And, you can always check it with Laplace/inverse- Laplace transforms. Having a clear intuitive understanding of what is going on, that is a whole different level of effort. These straight-forward worked examples, will help, especially if you are new to convolution.
@squarepusher303 No, the relationship is the same. In my experience, about half the textbooks use just omega, and half use jw. It is up to you (or your instructor or other authority figure) what you use.
dear sir thanx for such an easy explaination of this difficult topic. but i am facing problem in finding the limit of integration and graphing . please take complicated problems of sinusoidal and sinc function.
In my book the Fourier relation is given as H(w)=Y(w)/X(w) i.e. without the j attached to the w (omega). Is that relationship in any way different from what you've described in this video?
I wish this could have been explained this well when I took linear system analysis course, i would have probably got an A! damnit, I see it wasn't all my fault, these profesors don't explain well!
Really you don't know how thankful i'm for you Professor Morrell.
I learned this more than twenty years ago, and it still mostly confuses the hell out of me.
But if you plug the correct time functions into the convolution formula and follow the rules of integration, you can get the right answer. And, you can always check it with Laplace/inverse- Laplace transforms.
Having a clear intuitive understanding of what is going on, that is a whole different level of effort.
These straight-forward worked examples, will help, especially if you are new to convolution.
If the output is the same as the input (y = x), then the system impulse response is a delta function and the system transfer function is 1.
A million of thanks from Sydney
Great videos ! Made me understand this subject a tad more than I previously did. Thanks !
Great work Professor Morrell! I wish you were my circuits teacher.
And to think I looked stupid in class because of this. Thanks a great deal.
This taught me as much as my 60 minute lecture on the same topic...
thanks for the video. Not many engineering video out there
Very good vides Mr. Morrell, thanks a lot for posting that.
omg this is such a clear video thanks a lot
hard topic, nice explanation
@squarepusher303 No, the relationship is the same. In my experience, about half the textbooks use just omega, and half use jw. It is up to you (or your instructor or other authority figure) what you use.
Well done, Darry! Thanks a lot.
Thank you, this clarifies their relation.
Thank you
UNIQUE LECTURE
Thank you for this videos.
awesome...sir...
Thanx from Melbourne :)
dear sir thanx for such an easy explaination of this difficult topic. but i am facing problem in finding the limit of integration and graphing . please take complicated problems of sinusoidal and sinc function.
So the impulse response is just the behaviour of an ouput when the input is given a big impulse?
In my book the Fourier relation is given as H(w)=Y(w)/X(w) i.e. without the j attached to the w (omega). Is that relationship in any way different from what you've described in this video?
Fantastic lecture, thank you for your time. Minor comment: you are pronouncing asterisk as asterix!
may I know..how to calculate two system that connected in parallel..what is the formula?..is it same as cascade?..
I think you are Left handed ? is it correct ?
Heyy,, if i have linear graphic x=y, how to make it transfer function in laplace?
@DarrylMorrell Thanks!
We've done this before at my uni but they never even mentioned the term 'LTI system'
Coollllllllllllllllllllllll😎
I wish this could have been explained this well when I took linear system analysis course, i would have probably got an A! damnit, I see it wasn't all my fault, these profesors don't explain well!
In short: 11:28
just look the subtitles..........its funny............calling h(t) as 850..........and others too.
7:38 lol
awesome...sir...